But he’s got plenty of whine….

Screenshot imagery via WeaselZippers

President Obama’s choice of venue for debate prep is, well, amusing.   Las Vegas, Nevada – Home to Harry Reid and the most extensively corrupt labor union conglomeration.   Amusing and Apropos indeed.

(Via Business Insider) President Barack Obama arrived in Nevada last night to begin three days of debate preparation at the Westin Lake Las Vegas Resort, a luxurious golf community just a few miles from the Las Vegas strip. (more…)

Despite the water-carrying media’s protestations to the contrary, the capacity of the Progs to maintain the guise out in the open is failing.   Free and Fair elections are not condusive to hoisting an agenda on the vast majority.   The minority must maintain a false precept if they are to succeed.   They are losing ground…..

The vast majority of the American Electorate support voter ID laws, yet the progs fear the sunlight.    Russell Simmons is but one prog extremely upset about the prospect of voter accuracy – what he calls suppresion- and he wants everyone to know about it. (more…)

Perhaps this one of the most important discussion threads ever regarding Legacy Media manipulation.   We sincerely hope you will take the time to digest the content, think about the ramifications to what is here, and then share the information with others.

This is not a matter of opinion, the CNN stories are documented, attributed and cited.   They are factual.   Everything is verifiable within the embedded links and citations.

Believe it or not, just creating this discussion thread is risky. We are unable to expand.

Before getting to the CNN Amber Lyon expose’ (which is incredible and troubling) let’s first back up a moment and take you back to a previous video we shared surrounding recent events. (more…)

File this study in the same cabinet as “water being wet” and “forks in your eyes are painful”…… We certainly did not need a progressive university computer identification program to figure this one out…… and the inside is even worse.

(HuffingtonPost via Weasel Zippers) Republican congresswomen appear more “feminine” than their Democrat counterparts, according to a new study by UCLA psychology researchers.

“Female politicians with stereotypically feminine facial features are more likely to be Republican than Democrat, and the correlation increases the more conservative the lawmaker’s voting record,” said study author Colleen M. Carpinella, a UCLA graduate student in psychology, in an article posted to the UCLA Newsroom website.

So what makes a woman “stereotypically feminine?” (more…)

April 2011 Hill article:

A top union and a top liberal blog announced Tuesday that they’ll team up to sponsor polling through the 2012 elections. Daily Kos and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) said they will join forces to conduct issue and campaign polling in key states and races over the next two years…

…The SEIU/Daily Kos poll will use Public Policy Polling (PPP), a Democratic firm that uses automated polling rather than live, over-the-phone survey methods. Moulitsas contracted with PPP in June of 2010 after severing ties with Research 2000, which faced allegations of producing faulty poll results.

We were going to share a post about the electoral danger to the President for an investigation into the Benghazi “coverup”, then we spotted this post from Breitbart, and a link from FDRinHell which highlights and roadmaps respectively:

(Breitbart.com) Don’t be fooled by the supposedly bipartisan effort to investigate the Obama administration’s actions after the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya. Democrats are no more serious about challenging Dear Leader in the White House than they have ever been.

Trying to pass off his actions as part of a bipartisan effort at investigation, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) started circulating a letter that his aides said would be asking for more information. (more…)

How over-the-top can you be when listening to someone speak is now considered racist.  I didn’t think the woman in the video was racist, I thought she was expressing a genuine reason to vote for her choice. Listening to what she has to say does not make the viewer a racist, unless, of course, you are engaged in prog-logic.

Essentially the woman in the video advocates for President Obama because he promises to give her free stuff and she trusts him to deliver on that promise.   She points to his giving her a free cellular telephone as confirmation for her perspective. (more…)

BH e-mailed this question: “Remember when the three big auto companies got beat up for taking a plane [corporate jets] to Washington.  My question is whether or not Obama is obligated to reimburse for all his flights to campaign instead of using our money?   This must be costing us support him or not millions”.

BH, Yup, actually it costs us billions.   Essentially the way it works is so long as their is an offical public duty, or presidential event, at the destination then the entire cost is carried by the taxpayer.   If the event is exclusively for campaigning, then the Obama Campaign must reimburse expenses.

Of course you know what happens is the Administration schedules a policy speech, or an official presidential outreach appearance, in the same geographic vicinity to the campaign stop/fundraiser.   That way they don’t have to pay for it. (more…)

Question:   Um, Where’s the media on this?

Professor Jacobson continues to deconstruct the feeble:  For how long will Warren defenders maintain the charade that she did not practice law in Massachusetts?

[…]  Warren defenders argued that if she only represented non-Massachusetts clients in non-Massachusetts cases which did not involve Massachusetts law, she was not practicing law “in Massachusetts” even if she was practicing law in Cambridge.  Other strawman arguments included that as long as Warren complied with federal court admission requirements, Massachusetts could not require her to be licensed.  For reasons I have explained, those arguments are wrong.  […]

[…]  Yet still, Warren defenders persist in defending on the basis that Warren just wrote a few Briefs for out of state cases and never did anything for a Massachusetts client in Massachusetts, much less on a Massachusetts issue of law. (more…)