Major big time HatTip to Treeper Froggielegs for digging up the golden nugget we needed to finally prove what we have suspected for a while.   And with the helpful brilliance of Ad rem Puddy capturing the moments, we are finally able to highlight the setup of George Zimmerman and expose the dark underbelly of the Sanford Machinations.

Black Entertainment Television (BET) aired a Trayvon Martin Exclusive hosted by Emmitt Miller on April 20th.     April 20th is the same date of the First Bond Hearing for George Zimmerman and nine days after Mark O’Mara took over as lead defense attorney (4/11).
There are two videos.   Part II is the segment where the ulterior motives of Mark O’Mara surface and things click into place.
Key things to note in video #1:
         
Pam Bondi phone call to Tracy and Sybrina – Listen to what she says – Remember Pam Bondi and Benjamin Crump are personal friends from the Martin Lee Anderson case.   Bondi was the State Prosecutor and Crump was the Anderson family civil lawyer suing the state of Florida and Bay County.  It was Bondi who talked Rick Scott into selecting Angela Corey as the prosecutor of George Zimmerman.  Ugh, ugh, ugh….. It’s a trap.
Also note how Benjamin Crump lawyerly parses his words regarding Trayvon’s school records.  We know Trayvon was excessively tardy, absent 53 days in the current school year, and serving his Third 10-day suspension at the time he was staying in Sanford.

Prior post from The Volokh Conspiracy regarding comments, moderation, and the need for “BANNING / MODERATION” – presentation from January:
Fostering Strong Comment Threads, and the Effort Rule of Comment Moderation – I see Internet comment threads as a new and relatively important kind of online discussion, and I’m very interested in the conditions in which comment threads tend to be useful or just noise. In my view, having a really good comment thread is a terrific asset to a blog: It allows the post to be the beginning of a conversation, with the rest of the conversation carried on it the thread. The interesting and new question is, what are the conditions of helpful comment threads? What kind of comment policies and software leads to the best, most interesting comment threads, and which don’t? (more…)

Omar and Sibilj have provided some good food for thought regarding Mark O’Mara.   But before presenting their articulate comments for expansion I need to clarify a few things.
Some of you might see me use the term “prog” in many of my posts and comments.  Let me identify what I mean and position the backdrop for future understanding.  Truth has no agenda – People Do.
There is a keen, albeit difficult to grasp at times, distinction between advocacy and ideology.
I am open, wide open, to being an advocate for Mark O’Mara, but honesty, intellectual honesty, demands a substantive reason.  I have outlined twenty specific instances when my capacity to grant benefit of doubt, toward altruistic intention, has been stretched.
Simultaneously, by conviction, I must also be open to being more favorable to Trayvon Martin’s family position if presented with substantive, factual, and valid reasoning. (more…)

Question submitted via email to the TreeHouse Tip Line

Question: I’ve been on the side of Zimmerman is Not Guilty etc ever since the evidence started showing up, next to none of it even *remotely* suggesting a crime, and all the circumstantial stuff that people claim make him guilty I know is so easy to explain in light of the facts…except for one.
The lack of GZ’s blood on Trayvon’s hands. I know breaking a nose wouldn’t put any blood there, bashing in his head, etc. I know it’s possible to give one hell of a beating and end up with no bruising or blood on your hands.
But putting your hands over someone’s nose and mouth after the nose is broken and bleeding…has it been answered somewhere how that blood didn’t get on Trayvon’s hands? (A mixed DNA profile on one sleeve *could* explain it but that seems thin). (more…)

Pulled from a comment provided by GZTheCourageous.  I am working my way through the myriad of considerations and doubt I will offer more than just surface response.   Lots to flesh out on this, and before anyone comments please think though the variety of issues, highly consequential issues, the considerations outlined in this email provide.  Our hand was forced because this communication was dropped into a discussion thread, and in a general sense, as presented, it carries no risk. 
It is innocuous enough to allow to stand, and obviously O’Mara thought it “safe” to exist.  But further expansion most certainly would present risk.   I just cannot find the words right now to explain so that everyone would understand.   The last thing O’Mara or Zimmerman need right now is the perception of advice from a “blog” (Please read between the lines on my statement, Thanks)  /Sundance

(Written by GZTheCourageous) Wanted to post this email I received from Mr. O’Mara. Sundance, would you please contact him regarding a chat where we could directly ask him questions, as he suggests? Thanks.

From: Mark M. O’Mara
Subject: RE: Disappointed!
Date: Monday, July 2, 2012, 9:03 AM

I sincerely appreciate the criticism… there are many more nuances to consider  regarding the presentation, and I will respond in more detail… I truly appreciate all the great work done by everyone over there so far, and really take ur comments to heart… rest assured the presentation was metered for very specific purposes, as this is a long-game approach   the bull dog mentality would be premature…. goal for today is to get him out, that’s all…… I will respond better shortly….

Pls pass on, and I would like to c if we could set up a chat session so I could respond directly to q’s.. just need to maintain a level of security over the communications…

M Mark M. O’Mara
O’Mara Law Group
1416 East Concord Street
Orlando, Florida 32803
https://www.markomaralaw.com (more…)

fabulous

Hey all, anyone else noticed Fox has pulled an NBC? Look at this video:

Just room for expansion of discussion on two distinct but semi-related issues:
#1 )  The Sanford Police Department insider leaks (Detective Serino?) of specific information to present the most negative light upon George Zimmerman.   Specific leak of focus the Arrival Video of George Zimmerman to the police station.
#2)   Detective Serino claiming George Zimmerman “could have” avoided the confrontation with Trayvon by just talking to him at “two” opportunities.   (The legacy media currently having a field day with this one.
Regarding the leaked footage to ABC’s Matt Gutman.  I’m working on something deeper in that regard, but I enjoyed DiwataMan2’s, video and thought others might enjoy based on recent events:

If you have Twitter Account – Send Rapid fire questions:
Ask Matt Gutman “Why did Serino Leak – What was his benefit”?
Ask Jeff Weiner:   “Did you know Serino was the SPD leaker – Yes or No “?
Ask Rene Stutzman:  “Did you know Serino was the SPD leaker – Yes or No”?
Ask Ryan Julison:  “Did you know Serino was leaking to Media – Yes or No”?
Ask Natalie Jackson:  “Did you know Detective Serino was leaking info to media – Yes or No”?

Get them on Record Tonight !!

The many inconsistencies from Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s dad, regarding the night Trayvon was shot have been puzzling for many, myself included.   Previous puzzling false claims include:

• What time Trayvon left home  (multiple accounts)
• What time he and Brandi arrived home  (at least 3 different versions)
• Where he/Brandi were on the night Trayvon was shot (2 versions)
• Where he thought Trayvon was, and why he didn’t look for him (2 versions)
• The whole “Trayvon” sitting on the porch story (told twice)
• Telling police during the missing person report that he saw Trayvon at 8:00 to 8:30pm on the night he was shot at 7:27pm
• Brandi Green “Step mom”, then “girl friend”, then just “friend” etc.  Now? nothing ((crickets)) she has vanished.  But she is still listed on Tracy’s facebook page as “in a relationship” with pic.
• Unwilling to give police Trayvon cell phone password until he talked to Ben Crump attorney

See Video: