… such is the bizarre reality of George Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara.
Before getting into the substance of this consideration – multiple disclaimers are needed.
It is a sad reality the previous sentence even needs to be advanced, but it has become a necessary consideration. Because discussion of Mark O’Mara is so toxic and divisive, if we don’t quantify the substance of presentation with disclaimers we’ll spend a ridiculous amount of time having to moderate, explain and explain again.
We have approached both opinion and research on Mark O’Mara using the exact same methodology applied to all other parties in this case. People like Benjamin Crump, Natalie Jackson, Daryl Parks, Ryan Julison, Francis Oliver, et al, and even the media people like Daralene Jones, Matt Gutman, Frances Robles, Joy-Ann Reid etc. The exact same critical research approach has been applied.
Some people cannot accept using a critical lens to look at the O’Mara aspect. Many of those people are no longer here because of their inherent constitution not to be open-minded in the same regard.
What sets the Treehouse apart from most all others, is analysis based on research to apply the most logical explanations, Occam’s Razor, to some of the most difficult to understand aspects of any issue. The State of Florida V Zimmerman is one of the most challenging to understand from a perspective of intent and motivation. (more…)
