According to Fox News, the notoriously disappointing Brett Baier is scheduled to interview Kamala Harris on Wednesday, October 16th.

A traditional political review would indicate that Harris’ campaign must be very concerned about internal polling showing her well behind in the polls, the opposite claim from current corporate media.  However, caution should be applied as the Murdoch interests are diametrically opposed to the interests of President Trump and the America-First movement.

Baier is notorious for NOT asking the right questions.  So much so, that his position as controlled opposition for the Ryan wing of the Republican apparatus has been clearly visible for the past several years.

Some may think that Baier might take this opportunity to re-solidify himself as a honest broker; but that view only affirms the customary battered conservative mindset.  Brett Baier does what his handler(s) tell him to do.  Expect no truthful support from the interview. It is much more likely this is just another UniParty media effort.

(more…)

President Trump appeared with the Nelk Boys for his third appearance on the Full Send podcast. WATCH:

.

Content Schedule:

1:00 – Trump’s Shoutout to the NELK BOYS!
1:53 – Donald Trump on John Kerry
4:35 – Kamala’s Interview Scandal
5:45 – Donald Trump on Elon Musk
8:20 – Trump Believes we are Close to WW3

(more…)

James Clyburn is worried about Michigan and black men not voting for Kamala Harris.  His solution?  Tell them about the enlightened Europeans who have lots of women prime ministers and presidents.

.

Y’all know what Clyburn was up to in Michigan.  Unfortunately for him, lots of ballots have been invalidated.

(more…)

Spreading rapidly on social media, Univision was seemingly captured providing Kamala Harris a teleprompter script for responses during a townhall event.

The controversial snippet is embedded below.  Additionally, after reviewing the entire event, I am providing the full video as broadcast by Univision.

While the script is not used during the entire townhall event; yes, Kamala Harris uses a teleprompter during responses to questions that require policy outlines.  In short, her handlers do not seem to have confidence that Harris can provide succinct responses despite continual rehearsal.  WATCH:

🚨 BREAKING: Univision accidentally broadcast proof that Kamala used a teleprompter at her town hall

Watch them panic when they realized they were showing the prompter live on-air pic.twitter.com/fiUFcfN2Kx

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 11, 2024

.

I’ve looked at the entire broadcast. YES, there is teleprompter script running at specific segments of the event. NO, not all the time.

(more…)

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was asked about a political narrative that media attempted to stir up because he ‘supposedly’ did not take a phone call from Kamala Harris.  Apparently, Harris campaign mgr/operative Brian Fallon thought he could garner some political points by asking his media allies to push the story.

Appearing on CNBC, Ron DeSantis was asked about the issue.  In the mic-drop reply, DeSantis destroys Kamala’s effort.  WATCH:

Ron DeSantis just decimated Kamala Harris this morning on CNBC:

“All the storms I’ve dealt with under this administration, she has never called in Florida or offered any support. She’s trying to inject herself into this because of her political campaign.”pic.twitter.com/Ffu3OFVPx6

— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) October 10, 2024

.

(more…)

It will be very interesting to see how CBS News and 60-Minutes respond to the evidence of their severe manipulation of the Kamala Harris interview.

CBS has been caught with direct evidence of their intentional effort to assist Harris; what comes next will define CBS news in the mind of many Americans who still view MSM as a valid source of information.

(New York Post) – Former President Donald Trump’s campaign insisted Tuesday that CBS News release an “unedited transcript” of Vice President Kamala Harris’ entire “60 Minutes” interview after her “word salad” about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was cut from Monday’s broadcast. 

The dramatic edit was made after “60 Minutes” correspondent Bill Whitaker noted that “it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening.”  

The 59-year-old Democratic nominee’s response in the Monday night show was completely different and far more coherent than her rambling answer showcased in a preview clip released Sunday. (more)

(more…)

I was initially wondering why it took CBS 60-Minutes over 36 hours to upload the full interview to their YouTube account.  Now things make sense.

CBS 60-Minutes not only edited the interview, but they also completely erased parts of the interview and structurally moved answers to questions in an intentional effort to assist the Harris campaign.  In essence, CBS completely changed the interview.

CBS didn’t just shape or modify the interview; they literally moved answers to questions.  A Twitter user named @Mazemore was the first to notice one big substantial edit that completely manufacturers a different question and answer. “The edited version that CBS put on YouTube is a work of art. Mix and match questions and answers.”  This is unreal journalistic manipulation.  WATCH:

Remember Kamala’s word salad answer about Israel on 60 Minutes? It’s gone.

This is what many Americans will now see. pic.twitter.com/H4w7btDv6x

— MAZE (@mazemoore) October 8, 2024

CBS broadcast the edited version of the answer, as well as uploaded this manipulated version to their YouTube account.  Yet this same MSM media outlet decries the use of “deep fakes.”

(more…)

Politico is framing the “lack of vetting” as the reason Kamala Harris is now stuck with Tim Walz as a liability dragging down her campaign.  The VP nominee is essentially outlined as a lying liar who lies, although they use the word “misspeak” frequently.

Strangely, or not, Politico never outlines that Tim Walz was specifically vetted by Eric Holder. As a consequence, if the political left is going to run with the excuse of failed vetting of Walz to explain Harris losing, they are essentially saying Eric Holder sunk Harris.

[Article Here]

Key members of Harris’ circle weren’t aware of some of Walz’s inaccurate statements until they became public, despite the vetting process.

WASHINGTON DC – […] Since being tapped as Kamala Harris’ running mate, the folksy, plain-speaking Minnesota governor has had to explain a growing number of inaccurate statements — and at times embellishments — about his past. They range from comments about his military service to his visit to Hong Kong more than three decades ago to clarifying that his family didn’t specifically use in vitro fertilization.

It’s unclear whether Walz’s verbal errors will undercut his credibility with voters. But the need to continually clean up those claims could politically hurt Walz and Harris, who are locked in a tight race with Donald Trump and JD Vance. And in some cases, key members of Harris’ circle weren’t aware of some of the inaccurate statements until they became public despite the vetting process, according to four people familiar with the conversations who were granted anonymity to discuss the matter. (read more)

Something is askew in the world of the leftists because pointing out the vulnerabilities of a strategically important selection is never usually allowed.

(more…)

The overall prosecution attempt by Jack Smith was fundamentally deconstructed when the Supreme Court ruled mostly in favor of President Trump carrying ‘presidential immunity’ for officials acts while in office.  The ruling meant Smith had to go back to Judge Tanya Chutkan’s court and work through a process of outlining what is and is not an ‘official act’ according to the DOJ.

The result of that approach was made public yesterday, when Judge Chutkan revealed a new 165-page indictment [SEE HERE], essentially a list of evidence the DOJ claims as proof of “unofficial acts” allowing them to jump the hurdle of “official acts.”  However, the reality of Jack Smith’s filing is a story without much legal value. Instead, it is a 165-page Lawfare story created for media promotion.

Many followers have accepted that Jack Smith is not necessarily the person constructing the legal filings. There is a solid argument to be made that Andrew Weissmann, Norm Eisen and Mary McCord are the Lawfare allies tasked with writing the material.  When you read the filing, the manipulation of legalese to shape a narrative story is clear.

As former DOJ Asst AG Jeffrey Clark has noted, the filing attempts to obfuscate the legal requirements of “state of mind” by projecting what President Trump must have thought, as expressed by the opinion of unknown advisors.  Jack Smith says President Trump thought this, without actually providing any evidence of what President Trump thought. Additionally, this Lawfare approach toward including redacted quotes amounts to written testimony, which would never pass muster in any court.

The accused has a right to confront witnesses; however, in written text that questioning becomes impossible.  In essence, Jack Smith violates the principle and stated purpose of the sixth amendment.  This is one of the ways you can tell the filing itself is not intended to outline evidence, but rather to outline a story.  The claimed “evidence” is simply a story the Lawfare team want to deliver in October of an election year.

(more…)

During the Vice-Presidential debate Minnesota Governor Tim Walz was asked about his repeated false statements where he claims to have been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in the spring of 1989.

While it was surprising that an ideologically aligned CBS team including Margaret Brennan actually asked Governor Walz about these lies, his response to the direct question was even more surprising. Within his response Tim Walz essentially reveals he is an impulsive liar, prone to making up fictitious statements about events seemingly only to elevate his own sense of value.

Each of us likely knows a person who holds a similar disposition to Tim Walz; there are many impulsive liars in our modern world; however, to see his publicly broadcast attempt at covering up for his history of repeated lies is really something else. WATCH and decide for yourself:

.

Apparently, Barack Obama, Eric Holder and James Clyburn selected the exact perfect match for Kamala Harris when they choose Tim Walz.  Remember, former AG Eric Holder vetted all of the potential VP candidates, and as a consequence the long history of make believe that surrounds Walz must be known by those who are currently handling and controlling Kamala Harris and her campaign.

The only thing that makes sense, is that those who control Harris consider the flaws of Walz to be a feature or benefit to them.  Both Harris and Walz represent a false front, a Potemkin village manufactured from nothing to present as something very useful.  What Walz makes evident in the captured moment above, is that very dark forces are at work in the background. If there was no dangerous intent, he would never have passed muster.

(more…)