Quantcast

CIA Calls Out White House: CIA Station Chief In Libya Reported To Obama Admin Within 24 Hours Of Attack In Benghazi It Was Work Of Terrorists, Not Related To Mohammed Movie…

Americans Died – Obama Lied

WASHINGTON (AP) – The CIA station chief in Libya reported to Washington within 24 hours of last month’s deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate that there was evidence it was carried out by militants, not a spontaneous mob upset about an American-made video ridiculing Islam’s Prophet Muhammad, U.S. officials have told The Associated Press.

It is unclear who, if anyone, saw the cable outside the CIA at that point and how high up in the agency the information went. The Obama administration maintained publicly for a week that the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was a result of the mobs that staged less-deadly protests across the Muslim world around the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks on the U.S. (more…)

Context: “if four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal”…

Many people jumped on this comment snippet as soon as it was tweeted by the media. I sensed something was off with the media lead on the comment itself, so I witheld opinion until I could see and hear the context.   Having said that the term “optimal” was placed into the conversation by Jon Stewart.

However, Jon Stewart was talking about the poor presidential response, and the confusing explanations from the White House, Spokesperson(s), the larger administration per se’, and the President himself.   In essence the “confused messaging” was not optimal.

If President Obama was responding to the poor “messaging” descriptive then any outrage would have been seriously misplaced, because we all agree the confusing messaging was far from optimal. Heck, it was absurdly ridiculous.

BUT…

…. When President Obama responded to Jon Stewart Obama was not talking about the “messaging”, he was talking about the “event”.

So therefore EVERY CINTILLA OF BACKLASH for this horrifically worded response is ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATELY PLACED. (more…)

Report: Benghazi Strike Imminent ? On Ahmed Boukhatala ? Chief of Abu Ubaidah Brigades – a sub-group of the larger Ansar al Shariah militia

We noticed this Update over at TheUlstermanReport from WH Insider.   I think he has the name misspelled, but the right guy the Obama Admin is targeting.   We have outlined before and are familiar with a Benghazi terrorist named “Ahmed Boukhatala“.   First their tip:

(Via Update from White House Insider)  Have a heads up for you.  This comes directly from the Old Man.  Military intelligence may have tracked location of a guy called “Khattalah” who apparently organized the Benghazi attack.  Check media reports for name.  Obama to order drone strikes or possible all out bombing operation.  Says it appears imminent.  Obama will then make claim “perpetrators brought to justice” to squash Benghazi questions and play part of hero.  “Bin Laden Version 2 “  If accurate, this scenario would fit with the earlier rescue operation scenario you had sent me earlier.  That went to sh-t so now they are recalibrating the same general idea with an updated version of it.

I have not heard anything resembling something this specific.  Doing double time trying to confirm.  Nobody in Romney camp aware of this.  Or if they are, not tipping their hand. (more…)

Ulterior Intent – Kerry Ladka Gets The Dmitri Medvedev Treatment

For some unknown reason President Obama continues to say one thing to the face of the public, and quite another privately, or behind closed doors.   Makes you wonder what the character of a person is when they are unwilling, or constitutionally unable, to tell you openly what answers are to serious issues that affect our nation.    This lack of honesty and integrity in public behavior infers ulterior “intention”….   (Flashback-Medvedev)

For the record, I am not comfortable with this ideological skillset in a United States President….. and yes, I am able to see through this “media transparency” from the Washington Post, and I know exactly what their deflective intentions are:

(Washington Post) Kerry Ladka stood before President Obama at last night’s town hall-style debate and asked the question that would touch off an onstage verbal brawl and, later, an intense national discussion.  […]

President Obama, though, wasn’t done with Kerry Ladka. “After the debate, the president came over to me and spent about two minutes with me privately,” says the 61-year-old Ladka, who works at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola, N.Y. According to Ladka, Obama gave him ”more information about why he delayed calling the attack a terorist attack.” (more…)

CNN and The Obama Administration – Weapons of Misdirection

In the history books of wool-over-sheeple-eye-removal this might, just might, go down as one of the most obvious and over-the-top Machiavellian media manuevers ever.

Watching it unfold on live TV it did not seem right. It was awkwardly and comfortably scripted, and too smooth in execution. But watching it on replay the agenda filled manipulation was obvious. It appears Candy Crowley and CNN together with the Obama Administration scripted the Libyan injection into the Presidential Debate.

I’m not just talking about Candy Crowley interjecting on behalf of President Obama, and interrupting Mitt Romney, I mean the whole segment seemed like it was a set up.

So we did a little research:

Candy Crowley told Erin Burnett on CNN’s show Out Front, Monday Night 10/15, that she had collected the questions from the invited and vetted debate audience at Hofstra University and was reviewing them. This was Monday on the 7pm broadcast of Erin Burnett. The Debate was Tuesday.

When the question on Libya was asked by audience member Kerry Ladka, he prefaced the question by saying:

….this question actually comes from my, err, um, a brain trust of my friends at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola, yesterday we were sitting around talking about Libya…

If Candy Crowley already had the audience questions assembled the day before, how could Kerry Ladka and his brain trust friends have been writing one? (more…)

Musical Snares: Wait, huh… wha? Taking Responsibility Is A Good Thing?…. Well, ok then, I’m in charge… I’ve got the buck… she don’t count… I’m bigger. Swear

SNARE: a contrivance often consisting of a noose for entangling birds or mammals (1) : something by which one is entangled, involved in difficulties, or impeded (2) : something deceptively attractive…

WASHINGTON DC – President Obama’s campaign spokeswoman said that he “takes responsibility” for the security of U.S. diplomats, less than a day after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the blame.

“President Obama takes responsibility for the safety and security of all diplomats serving overseas,” said Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki on Fox News today. “Secretary Clinton of course has a great amount of responsibility as Secretary of State.”

Psaki denied that Clinton’s remarks were a “coordinated roll-out” to shelter Obama ahead of the debate, as Fox’s Shepard Smith suggested. (more…)

Fried Rice – Ambassador Reappears After Weeks In Witness Deflection Program..

Lying as a profession must be exhausting…..   Trying to test the water temp on the media pool Cabinet Member, Ambassador Susan Rice, pokes head out.   Briefly.    Yet, doubles down on stupid.

WASHINGTON DC – U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, in her first public comments on Libya since her controversial account days after the attack, blamed intelligence community talking points for the faulty narrative.

What the Flip you looking at me for?…. she [Hillary] already done took the blame”….

The light-on-details explanation Monday came as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took responsibility for any security failures leading up to the consulate attack last month.

But with the accounts coming as both presidential candidates head into a debate Tuesday night that will focus in part on foreign policy, neither appeared to settle mounting questions on the Hill about how the administration got the story so wrong. (more…)

Rudy Giuliani On CNN Panel: “I feel Like I’m Debating The Obama Re-election Campaign”…..

Probably because indeed he is. It is useful to remember this recent post about CNN as it pertains to covering up for the White House Cairo Embassy fiasco. Then watch the video:

Propaganda Panel. The 2012 U.S version of 1938/9 German media.

Hillary Accepts Blame For Libyan Ambassador Security FUBAR…… But That Doesn’t Change Principle Issues….

Before I watched this I was leaning toward giving her benefit of the doubt. But when questioned about the false narrative surrounding the Muhammed Video motive, the snickering sneer just reminded me of all that is horrid with Pantsuits. Actually, how could she answer that question? She stood above the caskets of four dead Americans and lied about what caused their death. Sickening. Watch the giggle.

Regardless of what political swords Hillary chooses to accept vis-a-vis her involvement, or lack thereof, for Libyan security.    None of that changes the primary issue(s).

(CNN)  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday tried to douse a political firestorm over the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she’s responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.

“I take responsibility,” Clinton said during a visit to Peru. “I’m in charge of the State Department’s 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts. The president and the vice president wouldn’t be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals. They’re the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision.”  (article)

Serious questions remain.   What happened?    How was  Sean Smith killed, why couldn’t the security on the ground defend ambassador Stevens, and what was going on within that compound for four plus hours before they retreated to the Annex?

Whose bloody handprints are on the wall?   Whose blood was in the ambassador’s bathroom?    No bad guys shot or killed?   Where are the people who survived?   Why are they not being interviewed and in public? (more…)

Axelrod Obfuscation – Will Not Say “if” President Obama ever met with National Security After Benghazi Attack before heading off to campaign fundraiser in Nevada….

Why?… probably because he didn’t.

Important to remember two points:   #1)  The attack happened at 3:40 pm Washington DC time on 9/11 and lasted til around Midnight DC time.   AND #2)  The Tactical Operations Command officer was in immediate contact with Washington DC, “in real time”.

So Chris Wallace is asking about the following day, on Wednesday 9/12.   Did President Obama meet with Security Council, or National Security and discuss attack?

(more…)