When I watch this type of debate, I am reminded why I stopped watching Fox News. Islamic Communist Abdul El-Sayed repeatedly claims Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is not needed, because the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) used to handle deportations. He says why do we need ICE when INS used to work just fine.
Big hair Watters could just easily say, because when the INS was in operation, we had less than a million illegal aliens and now we have 50+ million; that’s why. But no, they end up talking in circles about an issue that is a priority of most American citizens.
On each issue, it is very easy to take apart Abdul El-Sayed with policy facts and structural realism. However, that wouldn’t work for the communist cause, so Jesse Watters instead just banters for the audience giving legitimacy to the nonsense. Extremely annoying. Both of these guys are the problem.
.
I watched it and thought it was just a waste of time. I hope Mike Rogers eats Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Syed’s lunch in their debate.
We were driving back from Florida weekend with GKs when the interview came on. Jesse was terrible at presenting a legit answer to the strawmen being bantered about by the DSA candidate. What a wasred opportunity.
I tried to watch it, but couldn’t for the reasons posted here. Abdul is really good at motor mouthing and I believe bested Watters in that respect. It was just lots of noise.