The Wall Street Journal has published an article [SEE HERE] essentially trying to smear President Trump by saying they have gained custody of a leather bound book, put together by Ghislaine Maxwell for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. The book reportedly contains a “roasting style” letter sent by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein outlining their sexual prowess.
There are some who have speculated the recent tone and response by President Trump to those who requested release of the “Epstein files” may have been a proactive decision by Trump who knew the WSJ story was being assembled. However, the entire thing seems so over-the-top ridiculous it’s likely fake news or manufactured foolishness; akin to the Chris Steel claims of “tapes” showing President Trump standing on a bed in Moscow peeing on prostitutes (completely untrue and stupid).
President Trump responded: “The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so.
The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn’t want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don’t even exist.
President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a “Disgusting and Filthy Rag” and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant. If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for “TRUMP” to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS! (TS: 18 Jul 00:33 UTC)
If it’s true that Trump wrote it I bet the letter is excellent erotica. Trump excels at everything.
Yes. President Trump sitting at his desk, in his ruffled shirt, as a slight breeze caresseses his golden locks, he stares out into the distance contemplating the next passage to be written with using his feather quill pen. 😏
A tutorial for Stacy Abrams’ own work in such genre. Written with any woman but Stacy Abrams in mind.
A “bodice – ripper”, fer sure!
…and gazing at a big beautiful flagpole with Old Glory gently flowing in the breeze….
Using jasmine scented ink.
what is a Lincoln beard?
The style of beard that President Lincoln wore later in life, it kind of reminds me of an Amish beard.
It looks like it was more likely written by E. Jean Carrol. Or, perhaps by her cat; Vagina T. Fireball.
So this psyop only needs to effect a few.
Are you not entertained?.!
Bindergate morphs from Russiagate 2.0 into Russiagate 3.0.
The Wrap-Up-Smear playbook turns another page.
Fantastic!
This is the greatest news!
I am very glad to read this – thank you, Sundance.
My Mom who will be 97 years old in September reads the WSJ every morning, from front to back – she lets me have the crossword puzzle to help keep my brain in order (I am 73 years old); I do hope that I can be as sharp as my Mother and her mother who nearly made it to 100 in 2003 (shy of three weeks); she was also very sharp and read the paper every day and could hold her own.
I go out to the driveway to pick up the paper every morning and put it on the little table so Mom can see it is there . . . but before I give it to her, I take it to the top of the washing machine and wipe it down with a paper towel to be sure there are no red ants or our sandy desert dust to bother her eyes as she turns the pages. Ya get service around here!
Frequently as I do that morning wipedown, I glance at the headlines and nearly always find something irksome and rather out of touch or as the saying goes, “a day late and a dollar short” – especially with regard to news pertaining to our wonderful President!
My Mom and I had always loved the “Wall Street Journal” for many years, from the late 1960’s and into the 1970’s and it was always a great newspaper and they had plenty of advertising, both display and classified. My Mom has always been a sort of connoisseur of the classified ads in various papers, for homes, cars, furniture, that sort of thing; she would read the ads placed by others but she would put in her own ads, too and had great luck that way from the early days when she and my Dad were as “poor as church mice” and starting out in life together in 1948. Years later, she placed an ad in the “Wall Street Journal” back in the early 1970’s when my brother was returning to Stanford and the ad resulted in a carriage house for $100.00 a month that was part of an old estate in Atherton.
I don’t think it has really been the same paper for many years and if Mr. Murdoch could make a course correction to bring back the “old” WSJ, that would be great but right now he seems to be worried about having lots of color ads and letting it be rather weak in the quality of the reportage. It is no longer the fastidious paper it once was, really. I hope Rupert Murdoch will snap out of it and realize he is ruining a once-great newspaper.
The WSJ is actually becoming a tabloid!
“The WSJ is actually becoming a tabloid!”
Like everything else R. Murdoch touches.
Even better…..
Rupert Murdoch = Fox News!
May they both go down in the dustbin.
👏 👏 👍
If the Murdoch WSJ attack on PDJT _finally_ dissuades PDJT from watching so much Murdoch Fox News, it could be quite the silver lining.
Personally, I’d like to see him return to promoting OAN. It’s a shame what happened with OAN being removed from so many cable providers. I always believed it offered the closest thing to the real truth compared to other networks.
What about RSBN? They seem to be on the good side.
We used to have a subscription in the 70’s, I read it regularly, now it’s a tabloid…sad.
they occasionally have a good opinion piece. occasionally
Like a broen clock……
There are quite a few once serious reliable broadsheets which one could read and be assured of accurate news and political opinion. The Telegraph in Britain was my must read for decades when I lived there. Once in the capable hands of (now Lord) Conrad Black, imprisoned by Obama but pardoned by President Trump, it was where I was first introduced to Mark Steyn. Their crosswords were the bomb! Your mother would have loved them, suejeanne. It, too, has fallen.
So while the only time I’ve run across the National Enquirer was reading their salacious front pages whilst standing in line at the grocery store checkout, I dare say that today they would be considered a more reliable source of news than the WSJ, once the standard bearer for journalistic rectitude but now fit only for bird cage liner.
If that…
A better fire starter.
Paper…for paper training a puppy…
The Wall Street Journal is, and always has been, run by the CIA. Just like the NY Times as well. All despicable rags.
Epoch Times.
I love your story! I bought my elderly mother in law the EPOCH TIMES to replace the woke rag she read.
She loved their crossword and we had great conversations about some of the articles. I suspect it opened her eyes to Fox News a she stopped watching after she realized their reporting was lacking.
I liked it too as I got access on my phone to headlines and health wellness, mind-fullness and games recipes.
Way better than WSJ. Get her Epoch Times. I promise she will love it!!
Look into Epoch Times and who
may be associated with it.
🤷♀️ 🤷♀️
I just recently let my subscription to WSJ expire. 3 reasons:
1). It’s gotten expensive.
2). The “news” side is run by leftists. Daily seems like an edition of the NY Slimes
3). The “chamber of commerce” attitude that makes me detest the GOP Establishment Now permeates almost all opinion. And a lot of the opinion writers have TDS.
The bottom line is that the WSJ has devolved into a NeverTrump rag. The few writers there that I still respect — Kim Strassel, James Freeman, James Taranto —- are smothered by the likes of the rest of the Trump haters and out and out leftists.
Too bad…..
Miss Suejeanne,
If ya’ll like crossword puzzles check out what’s available on Amazon these days.
Type in:
‘wsj crossword puzzle books’
‘nyt crossword puzzle books’
‘boomer crossword puzzle books’
Some of the books are spiral bound, some come in large print, and some come in hardback rather than paperback.
Be sure to read the reviews.
Also, you can get puzzle books in foreign languages- those are fun.
0.o
The letter looks completely fake, it’s not in Trump’s voice at all. Epstein was into humiliation, and this feels like something he and Ghislane constructed with that in mind. Remember, this is a guy who treated his servants like literal pawns, to the point that he had statues of them on a chessboard. Nor should we forget other questionable “art” like that painting of Bill in Monica’s dress, which you can find online. This feels like more of the same stuff, so I don’t believe it for a second.
Aren’t PDJT’s personal notes/letters in written in a sharpie?
Anyway, these days AI can gen up notes, videos, voice recordings. For example, it would be easy to create lots of “evidence” against the Wall St Journal editor. Release such would be unethical and probably illegal.
But one could, in Congress, where they are allowed to say anything (debate clause of the Constitution), put examples on an easel, and point out just how easy it is to smear someone, then proceed to do just that (all to make a point.)
So everybody has to rely on the words of the WSJ byline reporters about what those pictures were like, or just their propogandist inference?
It will be like the E. Jean Nutbag case and several others.
It will NOT MATTER to window-licking nitwits. They will forever claim this to be true regardless of what facts are determined.
Remember the Q Anon crowd!!! 🥴
Window-licking nutwits…. lol
Suspicious cat looks as though he is about to puke on Murdoch’s shoes.
Or looking for the stash of catnip? Sundance, little kitty looks like he might need some…!
Always. A certain feline thanks you for the power of your suggestion, Aggiegirl!
The handling of the Epstein files has left him open to this kind of fake news and speculative smear campaign. Epstein evidence is likely destroyed and new evidence faked but Epstein wasn’t faked. Epstein was a Mossad operation and our intelligence community turned a blind eye or participated. I’m not interested so much in the individuals but in outing the Mossad and the evil that is Israel. Israel is a parasite ! It’s obvious that Trump is compromised by Israel.
Not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.
`But a remnant remains, of the rest, they are of their father, and do his will. The sybagogue of satan.
Not all descended from American are CIA
David
Links. Proof? Documents? Any evidence at all for your blatant hate and vitriol towards Israel?
Reminder…. There are American Jewish citizens who support President Trump who are targeted because of comments like yours.
Wear a Star of David sometime in public and you’ll see what I mean….
star of rinfin
Respectfully, I don’t think President Trump is compromised by anyone. He has the incompetent bureaucracy on the ropes and these smear tactics won’t save them.
R. Murdoch used to be great friends with the dirtbag Tony Blair for many years, until he discovered that Blair was schtupping his wife.
I am gonna say it. I told ya four days ago.
When do we return the audio glitch crap back on the Dems???
I believe that Trump–the man who survived two assassination attempts and evil schemes designed by his enemies to bring him down–would eventually get to the growing Islamist crisis in our homeland. But he stumbled over the Epstein affair and is being harshly judged and condemned by certain ‘former’ supporters (on other social platforms) who act as though they have never stumbled. My point is this: this man who has survived so much to make America great again might not survive back-stabbing condemnatory attacks from his own supporters.
And shame on ALLLLL these supporters for buying into all this. Let you who are without sin, cast the first stone. Jus sayin.
Best thing to do is take these damn “influencers” with a BIG GRAIN OF SALT! They are out there to get as many clicks and views as they can and amass as large an audience as possible so they can also hock their merchandise which seems to be centered around coffee and those hocking GOLD!!! 😑
PDJT directed PB to release grand jury testimony allowed by the court and other information she deems “appropriate.”
No matter what she reveals, I believe nothing will incriminate the President in any wrongdoing, but that will never be enough for the jackals.
The cries of “cover up” will continue endlessly and become louder over time. Moreover, unfounded allegations about non-existent documents and false claims/accusations from spurious sources will provide countless, inflammatory talking points.
This beast will have a long, sweeping, thorny tail, and it will rage until the midterm elections.
We must aggressively and unhesitatingly support the President on his “all in” bet to win what looms as the biggest challenge to the continuing success of his second term.
May God be with him.
Agreed! Let. It. Goooooo.!!!!!!!
Again, with the grand jury information release, Bondi will be the weak point and one has to cringe over how much damage her ineptitude will cause _this_ time. Would that a Stephen Miller were on point for this task.
Yes, “Ineptitude” is the correct word for it which can cause damage in itself. But not to be confused with “evil intent” of the former admin. of the last four years. IMHO.
The Grand Jury testimony has been under seal and cannot have been tainted by the left. The files most probably were adulterated.
It will be fun to watch the democrats reaction.
This may turn out to be the smartest move PJDT has ever made!
Forgot to mention Jeff Childer’s substack daily email “coffee and covid” explains all of this in detail. It’s a great (free) read and here’s the link.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/honeypot-friday-july-18-2025-c-and
I hope this puts them out of business. Thr writer needs to be taken for every dime she has, if possible, and never hired again! Hubris and stupidity don’t mix!
It won’t. But I believe this is a good development for PDJT on many levels. Just a few: It outs the WSJ. The editor has no idea, no awareness, of the mistakes she just made. Maybe more will see the rag it has now become. I noticed even Kudlow is going after the WSJ. Second, validates that the Epstein “list” is a hoax, and it’s helpful to PDJT in that regard. Third, and related to the second, it distracts from the whole Epstein controversy. This controversy is dying a natural death due to the reaction of the left and now the WSJ. Too bad PB handled it so poorly, but that was just a tactical error, which Trump is now cleaning up.
All it takes is one turncoat or disgruntled WSJ Employee to turn on them and suddenly the Court Case becomes a very dangerous thing for them to deal with!!! 🤔
Out of court settlements with many NDA’s.
Back in 2015, Nick Bryant published what is purported to be Epstein’s ‘little black book’. It’s been in the public domain for a decade. You would suspect that if there was anything in that publication that referred negatively to President Trump, this would have been publicized during his run in 2016, and presidency, when the Clinton faction attempted to throw whatever dirt on him they could find.
Behizy relays how Positive steps by PDJT vs Epstein are hush-hushed:
George
@BehizyTweets
If the Wall Street Journal wants to write an Epstein-Trump story, then they could easily write about when Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
They could also write about how Trump was the only one helping Epstein victims with legitimate information.
“The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people… He is the only person who picked up the phone and said, ‘Let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know.'” – Attorney Bradley Edwards.
The Epstein stuff is exhausting. I voted for trump. Twice. I would again if given the chance. I find no importance in this dead pedofile or his cohort in jail. It’s another democrats attempt………(fill in the blank). I pray for my president everyday so I am at peace in my life. Don’t give these people a platform. Let. It. Gooooooo.
On a Christian social platform I was told:
“He promised and campaigned on total transparency. He is not a man of his word and only keeps it if it benefits him.”
To the poster I said: Yes,he stumbled—exactly as all people stumble and break promises, vows, and let other people down.
Despite this, certain supporters hold him to a standard they do not and cannot hold themselves to. Nor do they see the consequences of what they are doing to Trump. Should he lose heart as a result of the attacks, the evil DeepState will smell blood in the water and move to take control once more and then will Trump’s high minded supporters who piled onto him with knives drawn feel satisfied by his demise at such a cost to all of us?
Christ warned that He will judge us according to the standards we judge others.
That person is a snake. Next time say “it’s not working and will never work”
I hope I live long enough to see Fox News on the top of the trash heap of failed businesses.
I’m starting to think “The Epstein Files” are of the same origin as the pee tapes;: a blend of a very little truth topped by imaginative embellishments and designed to control big name/big dollar personalities with threat of release. Remember, FBI in D.C. had only a box worth of Epstein documents when Pam Bondi released he binders. Then she found out of the thousands of documents in the SDNY DA’s office and had them trucked down to D.C.
Pretty sure each was reinspected and checked for credibility and mostly failed the smell test.
Yea the first spin was turning downloaded child porn that Epstein did…..
Into he made thousands of child videos.
This one mistake is what is fueling most sincere maga voters being upset.
It’s natural to go blood thirsty mad at that idea. But it’s false.
Let me see the letter. See? That’s not even a woman. I draw the best women. That’s what they tell me. I’d never draw a woman shaped like that. I don’t draw women, but if I did, they would look much nicer than that. Trust me.
-DJT
Pure diversionary tactical bullshit.
WSJ’s DEI “leader” will regret printing fake news even after being warned.
I certainly hope so
And the next deep state coordinated attack domino falls..
gets um
Amazing how it wasn’t released in all these years by the Democrats. Instead, they had to resort to made up stuff. 😭
The public relations operation will still work in some form.
Commenters here will forever dislike people here that had opposing views on this
Like sharks smelling blood in the water and circling is the liberal crazies. Unlike the shark, however, they won’t find anything of worth. MAGA and its president is rising and those who oppose will sink.
Missed opportunity.
Instead of this Truth post, would have been great if Trump had posted a sketch of Murdock naked with his ass missing.
I noticed the WSJ is not allowing for comments on this article. A little defensive are they? What an own goal they made! And now they will reap the consequences. This is such a good development for PDJT on so many levels, as I said in another comment.
The spiral to irrelevance continues at the WSJ. Its sad how far its fallen. Gray Lady’s sister now. Plus I see they advertise subscriptions on the cheap on Meta.
I’m really tired of about Epstein wither he killed him self or go to hell,
I have better things to focus on in life,
i don’t care,
No matter what I stand for MAGA,
God, MAGA almost got sucked right down this rabbit hole!!! So we now see that what is going on is Russiagate x 2 with the DEMS suddenly demanding transparency even though they had FOUR YEARS TO RELEASE ANY AND ALL FILES (Ro Khanna is a Hindu con artist)! Then when they think they found a chink in the armor here come the all out assaults from MSM AND RINO MEDIA!!! Yup, saw this same show back in 2017!!! 🥴
The WSJ today is no different than the NYT, WP or any of the others of that ilk. They do their level best to turn the most positive news from the Trump administration into a negative.
SO sick and tired of this garbage! Innuendo, lies are the only things these depraved people know to bring down President Trump.
Despicable and shameful…what is this teaching our children?
The most powerful man in Epstein’s orbit was the former president of the United States.
The obsession with connecting Epstein to intelligence agencies foreign and domestic is a very 2025 response to a problem from the Clinton administration. And many people forgot a time when the entire political and media class expended its capital denying that President Bill Clinton was a career sexual predator and that his wife’s political future depended on covering up for him. Those cover-ups involved the FBI, local law enforcement and officials in different states.https://bkdvk-zgpvh.campaign-view.com/ua/viewinbrowser?od=3z2bfeefc6e25f26cf812b76a5b8ac0e30e27282f9efb6946a6fa34a9221491b79&rd=11289f96a6f952fe6&sd=11289f96a6f9516e9&n=124296e03b0ccc&mrd=11289f96a6f9516d5&m=1
Isn’t it about time to move on to the next conspiracy…or maybe back to the UFOs? I did so enjoy that one.
👽 🛸 …
Suspicious cat says it all.
They got the B-day letter from the same publishing house as the National Guard Memo of George the 2nd
Trump is a NOTORIOUS germaphobe, he ain’t going for just any gal.
I cancelled my subscription shortly after Robert Bartley left the WSJ editorial board over 20 years ago.
The rag is unreadable since Murdoch empire took control.
Murdoch= Fox News
He owns Fox News.
May they both go down in the dustbin.
👍 👏 👏 👏
Let the record show (and it does …) that “private citizen Trump” was among the first to – proactively – alert law enforcement (from a distance …) to what Epstein really was. He saw right through him, and therefore would have very wisely avoided him. (He would be, after all, a billion-dollar “juicy target” for such a creep.)
These publications richly deserve to be sued out of existence. They have no morals, but Trump does. (Yet another reason why he’s “so damned rich, and earned it.”)
The problem with this nonsense is Trump’s public comments on Epstein give credibility to these kinds of smear campaigns. His abject denial of the Epstein files and wholehearted support for Bondi has caused millions of people to conclude he’s covering it up, because he’s on the list. Because he’s a pedo like Andrew and Slick Willy.
I know that isn’t true but to the casual poorly informed American, it becomes the only thing that makes sense.
SMH, whoever is advising him and controlling what information gets to him, is a duplicitous traitor
“Juicy rumors” like that one can, of course, go a long way. Especially when you’re rich. Epstein made his (real …) business from that. But, in verifiable fact, citizen Trump was one of the ones who first worked to expose him. Pulling the covers off his false identity: “he’s no ‘financier.'”
As Don Henley said in his song: “Give us ‘dirty laundry.'” People always want that. “Titillating” beats “true,” every time.
Bondi didn’t handle it well. The fact is that you can’t “just dump to the public” all of whatever “files” you may have. Especially when you are the US Department of Justice. You’d be opening yourself up to billions of dollars in libel and defamation lawsuits – and you’d lose every single one of them. By law, a prosecutor can’t even insinuate that someone has committed a crime until they have an unsealed grand jury indictment in-hand.
But, that doesn’t mean Bondi should lose her position. You’re allowed to make errors of judgment when talking to the public. As a seasoned executive, I think that Trump understands that.
Trump/DOJ could appoint a special prosecutor with a security clearance to pore through the materials, looking for possible criminal cases. But it would be expensive and take a long time – I think, with questionable chances for useful results. Epstein, by the nature of his “business,” had every motivation to lie. The bigger, the better. So, is it really worth it? Would any charges, based on any of this stuff, “stick?”
Well if we were looking for something that would make the admin’s behavior make sense, we just got it. Now it makes sense. Epstein was a Democrat Hoax is something I slept on last night and realized this morning we only “know” what we were told. And we only believe it because we want to believe it. That creepy temple building turned out to be a UTILITY type of building painted up and dressed up to look like something cultish. I never let that tidbit escape my mind. So is it POSSIBLE that even the claims of victims are fake? The Prince Andrew thing may be been real but it doesn’t need to mean it was more than a one-off deal. Epstein, by himself, has a reputation for scummy behavior, but there’s nothing objective that looks like it was “an industrialized” operation. We have at least one dead witness — was it an opportunist trying to cash in? And why aren’t we hearing from the living victims?
And part of the reason why my mind shifted in this way was because I saw yet another “AD” for gun control put out by a “Sandy Hook” father. Say what you like about it, but whatever it ACTUALLY was, it was weird, fishy and sketchy. “False Flag” doesn’t mean something horrible didn’t happen. False flags kill innocent people over history. False Flag means “someone else did it” pretending to be someone that fits a narrative.
So… what do we REALLY know? What is OBJECTIVELY provable based on objective informational sources? It’s actually very little. And that “temple” was a prop at the MOST. Who decorated it like that? No one knew about it until AFTER the whole raid/bust thing occurred. And why has that island been unavailable to the public since that time?
I’m also reminded of the pizzagate… someone fired bullets into that place thinking there was something underground there with children in it. Someone who believed something that was created for reasons unknown… unless it was as a way to recruit right-wing people to get arrested for a crime responding to a false government created narrative.
Are these fictions like Q and Pizzagate and so many other things INTENDED to recruit or create right-wing responses?
[… we only “know” what we were told.]
Exactly so, Daniel. That is why I consider Mike Benz the official spokesman for the IC at large.
More “Look- Squirrel!” crap.
The dialogue is too literate for Trump..
Comey’s daughter had control over the Epstein documents.
James Comey is adroit at writing dialogue.
We know James Comey lives and breaths Trump.
This would be the ultimate act of vengeance.
WSJ’s lifeblood is subscriptions. They, like so many others are facing a dumbed down, digitally saturated, ever shrinking pool of potential subscribers.
This decision to “sell the sizzle” is purely driven by the much needed financials it is projected to deliver. Nothing more.
So they shave off another little piece of standards to live another day, and why not? Everyone’s doing it – right?
When you’re rich, you’re a natural target for blackmail. Especially if you like to go to open-bar parties on islands, and your “friend” offers to fly you there. You pose for [just, “party” …] pictures – probably more than a little tipsy by then. (If you are also a child molester, it gets worse …) Anyway: You don’t recognize a “honeypot” when you just walked into one.
Trump, as one of the very-biggest “targets” in all of New York City, did recognize the trap, and did alert authorities to what was really going on. Not only did he not walk in, but he revealed the trapper. It was credible and unsolicited testimony like Trump’s that spelled the beginning of the end for Epstein.
Therefore, no matter what fake drawings or Photoshopped pictures you may come up with, the man’s street smarts and very obvious good moral character tell me that you are lying. Donald Trump was, and is, “much smarter and more worldly than most.” There’s a reason why his net worth begins with a “B.”
Well said.
a “roasting style” letter sent by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein outlining their sexual prowess from 2003?
I certainly would have forgotten about a quick letter that I dashed off one day over 20 years ago. Hopefully, he didn’t. But ‘outlining their sexual prowess,’ who cares? It sounds like more “grab ’em by the p+++y’ man talk, which offends the white females and their effete male partners.
The Wall Street Urinal
A post containing a screenshot of an X/Twitter post showing a female stick figure with breasts… A Ok.
My post containing a GIF of Judge Judy performing her famous eyeroll… In moderation purgatory. 🤷♂️
This is why having a clear plan, devised by and executed by highly competent individuals is so important, and sets apart the administration 45 from 47. Planning not only prevents the three P’s but allows there time to deal with, and create contingencies for, events like the Epstein Op launched, I believe prematurely, by an increasingly desperate DS.
Because not an hour, in the four years in exile, was wasted all that has really happened is a continued, in fact accelerated, schedule of damaging and finally destroying the platforms the DS have routinely have used against opponent’s of their illegal activities.
Trump will probably come out stronger than he did before this erupted, whilst his opponent are definitely going to be weakened, which is certainly something you couldn’t say in the President’s first administration.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/revealed-wsj-reporter-who-wrote-epstein-hit-piece/