In very simple terms, the Supreme Court ruled today (6-3) that federal judges can only grant relief to the individuals or groups who brought a particular lawsuit and may not extend those decisions to protect other individuals without going through the process of converting a lawsuit into a class action, a type of litigation that requires challengers to clear procedural hurdles. This effectively ends the issue of nationwide injunctions. [SCOTUS Ruling HERE]
The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the end to birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens. However, the Trump administration and DOJ are very happy.
“Today, the Supreme Court instructed district courts to STOP the endless barrage of nationwide injunctions against President Trump,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on Twitter. “This Department of Justice will continue to zealously defend POTUS’s policies and his authority to implement them.”
Good ol ‘ Norm Eiesn already tacking towards filing under “class action lawsuits”.
They never stop! Dammit!
The Judiciary doesn’t have guns…
The Executive {POTUS} has guns…
And bombs…
And “assault type”…
Deadly…
Stealth…
B2 bombers…
Winners do not compromise.
Winners set terms.
WWIII has been officially cancelled.
The global nuclear threat to US has been officially eliminated.
The Islamic Republic {pronouns was/were} has been officially unnuked.
CAPITALISM = FREEDOM
In God We Trust
{All others pay cash}
Trust God
Fear not
It is not easy to get a destination as a class action. There are specific requirements and that question is often litigated extensively.
These rogue judges will do it anyway. I think Boasberg did at the temporary restraining order stage, which is unheard of. Some or all of these cases will end up going back to the Supreme Court on that issue.
The fact that the Supreme Court has ruled in this means that President Trump is under no legal jeopardy to ignore them.
Is that true, though, with class action suits?
That’s what I’d like to understand. Will the Lawfare people be able to pick and chose judges?
Procedurally it is very difficult. There would be a period of discovery, motions practice and would likely fail. The jig is up.
This is a huge ruling. It takes much of the wind out of the sails of the “God wears a black robe” contingent of the judiciary. Next to the corruption of law enforcement and the wholesale graft of the members of the ruling governmental bodies, the move of too many in the judicial branch toward the position that the judiciary is supreme was a big factor hurtling us toward civil conflict. That is stayed, at least for the time being.
Who knows, some of these judges might even have to acquire a pocket Constitution and brush up on what it actually says. Scary, I know, but no one said wearing a black robe was for the faint of heart.
J
Has really nothing to do with the Constitution, rather the law as regards “Courts of Equity” and the British antecedents as well as procedural law — Rule 23 for Civil Procedure as regards “class actions”.
Justice Jackson’s dissent, to take one example. seemed to allege a violation of the Constitution in the EO, and chided the majority’s opinion for giving it full reign.
I think she might find some solace in your opinion that today’s ruling had no Constitutional implications.
J
Typical liberal. All about their “feelings” and no damn substance to the argument. Coming from the woman who doesn’t know what a woman is.
The Constitution does not provide for or establish federal strict courts at all . The Constitution only establishes the Supreme Court.
The federal district courts are a creation of Congress and they can be eliminated just as easily.
Thank you for that information. All of this time I just assumed the constitution gave these political clowns the authority to wreck havoc like they have been doing. Now as for Congress doing something about that…
🤨
Oh no, it doesn’t. The Constitution doesn’t even give the judiciary the authority to review actions of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court just seized that power for itself. The Constitution also doesn’t require impeachment as the only way to remove judges-again, the judiciary just made that up.
Appointed Forever (live)
I would say this song sums up the mindset of the federal district judges assigned to the cases brought against the Trump Administration.
Sadly most will not understand what you are referring to
Well, aren’t we glad he explained that to the rest of us dolts here.
I think that I am correct in noting that Justice Jumanji is the first Appellate judge to be reversed 9-0 by the Supreme Court who then got elevated to it.
The woman wouldn’t recognize the Constitution if it bit her on the ass.
From ASHQ
Supreme Court Ends Abuse of Injunctions: No More ‘Judicial Supremacy’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/06/27/supreme-court-ends-abuse-of-injunctions-no-more-judicial-supremacy/?twclid=26o6n0z6fi7disqhy0rrjtjujn
Kind of. Justice Alito, in his concurrence, brought up an important point that was NOT addressed by the ruling….that of ‘class’. While SCOTUS ruled against the nationwide injunctions, they left open the question of the district courts initiating a ‘class action, which, if I understand it correctly, goes beyond the particular parties that are before the court. The question becomes, how does creating a class that is beyond those particular parties differ from creating an injunction beyond those same parties? By the way, if you have n ot read it, try trawling through Jackson-Brown’s dissent. It si akin to something you might read on X, but well below the expertise one would expect from a Justice of the Supreme Court.
Read FRCP 23. It sets out the criteria that a district court judge must meet before a class can be certified. I expect the Dem judges will “find” the facts that justify certification.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23
But they can be challenged at length and this issue litigated.
Class actions are also extraordinarily expensive to litigate and take years.
I am trying to remember a class action against the US government and can’t remember one. Civil rights litigation under the civil rights act cannot be done by class action. Does the tort claims act permit class actions? I don’t think so but would have to research.
I think all of the J6 attendees who were effected by the federally planned false flag and were arrested, assaulted, imprisoned, or harmed in any other way should be a Class with a huge action for damages against the unseen forces of the government who knew that they were innocent but pursued them anyway.
J6 defendants and their attorneys should be keeping an keen eye on this and how the left moves.
Biden’s DEI choice……
Personally, I feel that it was the AUTOPEN’S DEI choice!
And whoever gave the orders to the person actually holding the AUTOPEN!
They already have the class, it’s called illegal aliens.
Wonder what kind of damage can be done to the american people “defending” the “rights” of the “class” of illegal aliens who are contiually breaking the law, seeking loopholes, following guides who teach them how to take advantage of the goodwill of America, and how to be a “victim”.
I hope and pray, however, that the ultimate result is streamlining and imrovement of the immigration “filter” that determines who gets the privilege of being an American citizen.
The filter has many merits as it is: must learn and appreciate American history, the founding principles and documents, the acknowledgment and submission to God, but freedom from the government telling you how and what you must do with respect to your relationship to God. The Responsibilities of citizenship
Don’t disagree, my point was that they dont ‘need to invent a class for class actions, they already have it, and as you touch on, they won’t hesitate to try and sell illegal aliens as deserving.
I hate those people so much; the politicians and American hating illegals who steal from me, you, and the rest of my fellow countrymen.
I am of the opinion that the Supreme Court was feeling the heat as it was beginning to get intense.
That is why ACB wrote the ruling and was allowed to swing for the fence against Jackson.
SCOTUS worried about an emperor has no clothes situation, i.e. judiciary has no enforcement power (hello, maybe for a reason)
And SCOTUS was also perhaps worried about the FBI looking into the leak of the Dobbs opinion. I have a suspicion Roberts doesn’t want that inquiry.
I think I agree. The issue was becoming too heated, PDJT kept commenting about it, Stephen Miller continued to attack, Senators and the AG were extremely vocal. I wouldn’t be surprised if the CJ was receiving back channel convos about it. There was a lot of chatter about damage to the judicial branch. The optics were poor, the USSC was dealing with one request for stay after another – something had to be done.
Congress was also being squeezed to take action against the courts. It was becoming increasingly clear congress could limit their power or even do away with them.
The Supreme Court jumped out to take the lead on reigning in the lower courts to keep from being dragged.
It was going to happen either way.
It ain’t over
It makes me wonder what was the mechanism of this swing in the pendulum (hopefully more than a trend). Was it specific orders from one of the Justices, or someone or some body of people with blackmail power trying to hold their influence. Or is is internal fears of being exposed by the individual justices?
OR is it what we hope – internal reflection and meditation by each Justice, hopefully in prayer with God — as to the weight of responsibility their position carries — causing a true change of heart and wisdom so that their judgments begin to reflect the wisdom of our Creator.
Barrett put some distance between herself and the 3 harpies so that she is not seen as siding with the “sisterhood” 100% of the time. I am still going to keep a jaundiced eye on Barrett.
A good day, but I still think Wayne Root is right—federal judges should be vetted for possible Cartel ties.
Every single person including their entire family members down to 6th cousins should be.
That would be about right.
This absofreakinglutely should be a thing…unfortunately, nominees tend to be rubber stamped in;.
Then the higher courts will hear about the disgrace the newly appointed judge is bringing to the bench and will try to quietly remove said judge.
Sometimes it goes smoothly, sometimes it doesn’t…all in all, at the end of the day, nothing truly matters anymore regarding politics and the right/wrong we see happening daily.
I think starting with Boasberg’s daughter’s would be interesting.
https://x.com/i/status/1901975614564729068
Her job description sounds like money laundering conspiracy with NGO’s to me.
as a “capacity building associate”. In her position, SHE HELPS COORDINATE AND ADMINISTRATE GRANT ACTIVITIES , ENSURING COMPLIANCE, and supporting the delivery of capacity-building programs to strengthen nonprofit infrastructure.”
And the RICO against the DJT lawfare purveyors and participants.
I would say all elected officials and judges, federal, state, and local should be vetted for Cartel ties. Start in those areas and with those people who are from areas of high Cartel activity.
Would never happen. Politicians with cartel ties would be exposed. Prime example, Arizona and Katie Hobbs
Yeah, they finally read the room and realized they didn’t want to get re-purposed into lamppost ornaments.
Excellent ! Thank God !
Question:
Does this decision vacate all of the nationwide injunctions levied by tne various District Kings….um, Judges…this year?
Or at least limit them to the specific defendants and/or District in which they were brought?
Limits them to the specific plaintiffs named in the complaint who asked for the injunction.
So, who pays for the damages to put the genie back in the box? After all, these plaintiffs are supposed to be depositing monies in case they fail in their lawsuit.
Well done on the “District Kings” reference 😎
ACB finally earned her salary. This was a BIG one and she meticulously followed history, precedent and the Constitution.
Love me a good cat fight! Maybe ACB is waking up to the fact that the “mean girls” are actually just “dumb girls” (aside from Elena Kagan who is definitely a leftist but not a stupid one, IMHO).
She really wanted to be friends with them to prove to herself that she is kind, tolerant, and non-judgmental, which are the MOST important character traits for a AWFL, especially one from Notre Dame!
But maybe she has finally run out of patience and is having to admit that the guys on the court (especially Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito) are in fact, smarter and far better qualified, and she would be doing herself, and her historical reputation a favor, if she started agreeing with them more often!
Kagan was Scalia’s duck hunting partner.
??
AI Overview
Yes, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Elena Kagan did indeed go duck hunting together.
Their hunting outings began as an interesting story during Kagan’s confirmation hearings in 2010. During her Senate visits, many senators asked her about hunting, and she confessed that she was a “Jewish girl who grew up in New York City” and knew nothing about the sport. She promised one senator that if she were confirmed, she would ask Scalia to teach her how to hunt.
After joining the court, Kagan shared this story with Scalia, who found it hilarious. Scalia, an avid hunter, took Kagan to his gun club, taught her gun safety and how to shoot, and the two began taking hunting trips together. They hunted various game, including birds in Virginia, deer in Wyoming (Kagan successfully bagged one), and ducks in Mississippi.
Their hunting trips were a way for the justices to bond outside of their professional roles and develop a warm relationship despite their ideological differences on the bench.
After Cheney shot him !
Was SHE the duck or the DECOY?
Rhino?
No. He just didn’t take differences in judicial positions personally. Scalia and his wife vacationed a few times with RBG and her husband.
I hope so but am doubtful. I think SCOTUS was feeling the heat in this case, and they deliberately didn’t rule on the concerns expressed by Justice Alito.
She’s going to need ice for that burn, that’s for certain.
Is it often that such a personal sounding and personally sounding rebuttal occurs from one Justice to another at the supreme court level?
This is huge.
It is clear the plan for Stopping Trump if the 2024 Cheat was not successful was to use Lawfare like never before seen by turning each Federal Judge into the Arbiter of What Happens across the country.
I wonder what went on behind the scenes to get SCOTUS to apply the Law/Constitution…?
Coney-Barrett: “Everyone from the President on down is bound by the law. That goes for Judges too”
As I understand it, and rightfully so, the majority found that District Judges were not following the law by ruling outside their (Congressionally constrained) jurisdictions.
For over 8 years we’ve been told repeatedly by the Left that “nobody is above the law”. And now, the three Leftist dissenters want to excuse the Judiciary from that rallying cry.
The ends always justify the means for the Left … they are hypocrites.
In the case of the Alien Enemies Act, the federal district court judges’ jurisdiction was limited to those alleged alien enemies “at large” in their assigned districts or apprehended in their assigned districts. No judge could take up the case of an Alleged alien enemy in another judge’s district.
“The Alien Enemies Act of 1798, part of the broader Alien and Sedition Acts, grants the President wartime authority to detain and deport citizens of enemy nations residing in the U.S. Specifically, Section 23, codified as 50 U.S. Code § 23, outlines a process for federal courts to review complaints against alien enemies deemed dangerous to the public peace. This review allows for potential removal, surety for good behavior, or other restraint, as determined by the President’s proclamation or regulations.
Key aspects of Section 23:
Section 23 as written in 1798:
“After any such proclamation has been made, the several courts of the United States, having criminal jurisdiction, and the several justices and judges of the courts of the United States, are authorized and it shall be their duty, upon complaint against any alien enemy resident and at large within such jurisdiction or district, to the danger of the public peace or safety, and contrary to the tenor or intent of such proclamation, or other regulations which the President may have established, to cause such alien to be duly apprehended and conveyed before such court, judge, or justice; and after a full examination and hearing on such complaint, and sufficient cause appearing, to order such alien to be removed out of the territory of the United States, or to give sureties for his good behavior, or to be otherwise restrained, conformably to the proclamation or regulations established as aforesaid, and to imprison, or otherwise secure such alien, until the order which may be so made shall be performed.”
It is not hypocrisy for the lefties, for them it is hierarchy. “Sit down, shut up and do as we tell you to do. We are in charge here.”
SCOTUS had to rule as they did for two reasons:
The nation’s patience was running out with one liberal “shopped” district Judge after another attacking anything President Trump tried to do;
Second, since any minor judge could issue a nationwide injunction it made the Supreme Court look powerless as they had to hear a case, review the evidence and then issue a majority opinion. These injunctions completely undermined the Robert’s Court and challenged judicial legitimacy.
The only court with nationwide jurisdiction is SCOTUS. The district court’s jurisdiction stops at the district’s lines (one or more counties within a state), and the circuit court’s jurisdiction only extends to the states within the circuit’s defined borders.
And, even then(!), their “nationwide jurisdiction” exists only because of judicial “decisions” that they themselves made, such as Marbury v. Madison. The Constitution never contemplated any such powers. Neither did the nascent “Judicial Act” which they now quote. The word, “unconstitutional,” does not appear in the founding document, nor was its appearance ever contemplated.
And they did so in such a devious, underhanded way. The ultimate outcome in Marbury v. Madison favored the executive branch, so there was no challenge to by legislation or by refusing to follow the judgment. It was just unnecessary dicta, yet it’s presented as some weighty, wonderful thing when in actuality it was underhanded and sleazy.
Isn’t that exactly tbe problem we were discussing?? The overreach of minor courts not constrained by an appropriate SCOTUS decision.
Whenever it is a 2A case, the courts always, always make for the most limiting relief possible. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Get wrecked leftoid freaks.
The question arises: What “class” is affected by limiting Federal Judges from issuing nationwide injunctions ?
The class of entitled leftist lunatics
This decision does not go far enough. The class action rules are going to be gamed hard in these same rogue district courts.
And Ketanji Jackson is the Joe Biden of Supreme Court Justices.
That’s exactly what’s going to happen.
Judicial Coup of activist District Court Judges.
Collect the Criminal Intelligence of this Judicial Coup
then Arrest & Prosecute the activist District Court Judges.
–
President Trump must protect Article II Powers and Authority
of the United States Constitution.
The activist District Court Judges are replacing President
Trump’s Agenda with their own political agenda.
Another great day with President Trump
disagree that PDJT was “given” anything law was upheld so this shouldve been the outcome in any scenario. Huge rulings today lots of good news MAGA and thank you
She seems to be very upset 🤣
I wish I was smart enough to understand what she was saying with all of those big words.
To quote Elon Musk, “Go f*ck yourself in the face” you silly woman.
Don’t forget the “step back” as a primary mover of this action.
Her tattoos are vile and disgusting Thats enough for me.
They are just so ignorant where they get their information. This is all about the constitution.
so the question that I think everyone should be asking?
how and why does congress confirm these kinds of judges?
it becomes obvious that the real problem with a lawless judiciary, are the people who conspire to put them in those black robes.
also noting: we got lucky on this one. there are only three unlearned scroundrels. for the time being, we are lucky, the balance of this court does not include two or more additional morons. But that is the point I’m making here. there is nothing that is preventing Congress from continuing to put black robes on very unqualified people….they do so not because they don’t know better, but because they just don’t care about the law. it’s only about power and the ability to USE the courts for personal political leverage.
we just missed the bullet. we got lucky.
what are the solutions in the future when SCOTUS and the judiciary act solely in decisions to advance political owed favors?
revolution, stage 4: transfer of power.
ultimately, the “law” will be tested….and in a non trivial manner!
God Bless America
Schumer already told us about the 250 “progressive judges” who were short circuiting Trump’s policies with the lawsuits. Schumer was relieved that Democrats in the Senate got so many “progressive judges” confirmed so they could screw Trump with the lawsuits.
I believe Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General, recently wrote that Texas received a lot of those 250 judges. He said that unbeknownst to most Texans, about 70% of the judges in Texas are now from that category!
Don’t some judges get reappointed or reconfirmed by the population each year?
Bet there will be some sour faces and distorted explanations on the legacy news this evening. WarRoom is already showing some of them.
I won’t be watching! FAKE NEWS!
So if there is another unlawful Executive Order mandating harmful ineffective experimental injections that are unnecessary, as happened September 2021, we the people will now find it much more difficult – to impossible – to oppose.
Who considers this a “huge win”?
Looks like everything is proceeding as planned, with the synthetic virus Replicon shots and matching engineered virus pathogens staging for deployment.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/attack-of-the-replicons
All this is setting the US axis up for biowarfare democide – not the China axis.
And Trump is part of the setup, as the subject of this CTH article confirms.
Even though I think this is the correct decision, I know that Jeff Childers of the Coffee & Covid Blog made the same point when this case was being argued. The first bright spot in the whole C-19 debacle was when the judges on the 5th Circuit put the breaks on Biden’ illegal jab mandate – I personally know dozens of people whose companies changed their policies and offered personal and religious exemptions because of that decision.
Happy about the decision today but also watching and waiting to see if the Left uses this to their advantage in the future…
Mandates have been permitted by courts under the principle of “compelling State interest” in requiring citizens to do whatever a mandate demands they do. In the tale of the C-19 alleged “vaccines,” it came to the point that people would get the shots and still contract COVID. There was no immunity given by the shots. This couldn’t be hidden anymore as illustrated by Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla’s statement that his injections could provide “limited protection, if any.”
There is no “compelling State interest” in forcing people to take injections that don’t produce what the State wanted produced by the injections—IMMUNITY TO THE DISEASE.
ah, but the definition of a vaccine was modified.
not to cure or to provide immunity….but “protections against”.
it’s sniveling word salad, that really means whatever the pharmas want it to mean…there was no doubts lobby action from lawfare types that influenced the decisions. I believe it was rooted in the aspect that as you stated, mRNA was never going to provide a cure, immunity, or any kind of action that would decrease transmissibility or infection.
Science finally caught up to the grift, and as expected “science” decided to shift the goal posts and redefine the language terms to a vague “protection against”. This would also accomplish two major shifts in “agency decisions making/recommendations”
a. it would advance mRNA “drugs” in other use cases that don’t have to meet the rigors of actual double blind efficacy and safety standards, which has been the basis for a very long time. (what exactly is “protection against” and how does one measure it? see the problem? it’s either preventing infection and transmissiblity in a MEASURABLE WAY, or it isn’t. “protection against” can be defined as just about anything and is empty words that eliminate the proof requiring the vaccine be measured as effective and safe).
b. it also means that a more broad and vague generalization rather than actual hard repeatable science will allow future drugs to be used, in “emergency authorization” circumstances. If you don’t have to measure safety and effectiveness, and only “protections against” is the goal, there is no pressure or requirement of drug manufacturers or regulators of them to actually perform real double blind safety and effectiveness trials….it erodes the very scientific value of a very long arc of stringent scientific method that has been applied to drugs and to make sure they work BETTER THAN NO VACCINE AT ALL AND (a very key point), THAT THEY ARE SAFE.
analogy to make the point clear:
if I tell you that 2 plus 2 = 4 (four), you don’t have to be concerned that I am making up a false answer or that I have made a mistake. And the reason is because you can PROOF the mathematics yourself. And because its reproducible. But most importantly, because we agree that the same mathematical equation and definition is standard. we agree that the sum of two whole numbers is addition. There is no ambiguities, you can repeat the math, and it holds the same answer each and ever time.
however, if I then tell you that we are going to change the rules of math and redefine addition, how can we have reproducibility? how can we come to an agreement with how addition actually works?
the mathematician tells you: the sum of 2 + 2 = 4.000…nothing more, nothing less…exactly and precisely 4.000
the statistician will tell you it might be 3.7 to 4.3 …probably.
the CDC/FDA will tell you…”what do you want it to be?”
and THAT is why the science is bullshit…and why no one should trust a central state to determine health recommendations …no one should trust the government to make recommendations for health care.
the government is not my doctor. it has lost all trust because it fails at even the most basic science and reason and logic.
no to mRNA because the science has been warped to mean whatever the drug makers and jabbers want it to be…
but that isn’t how science and medicine WORK.
science and medicine only work when it can be proven objectively with standard basic math that it does work.
redefining the definition of a vaccine is akin to changing the rules of arithmetic and then also saying it’s still going to produce the same 2+2 math problem
no it does not, and the sniveling word salad and gaslighting that has gone on to hide this agenda and really purpose has revealed at least to me two things:
a. the government is composed of very corrupt people who should be marched off the prison for nuremborg levels of crimes against humanity.
b. people, human beings, by and large are really stupid and have failed at basic science, logic and reason.
at this point, I’m not too sure which of these two are more troubling. But he combination does not bode well for the future societies that seem determined to remain stupid and clueless about general health and fitness.
God Bless America
The fact that several states have ALREADY filed cases asking for Class Action status basically means that the Norm Eisen’s of the world knew that this was the likely outcome, and they were ready.
“Appeared?” . . . 🤡
I think the SC has realized how biased they have appeared the decided they needed to straighten up.
Judge Boasberg vacates the ruling
Class-Action Lawsuits: “Yes, they will immediately do that.” Of course(!) you knew they would. But they will very quickly encounter the obstacles that are intentionally built into that system.
They will quickly discover that you really can’t file a “class action” that is intended to protect “everyone who is left-handed.” Like apparently they thought that you could do with a “nationwide injunction.”
Mike, I will add, that let them try. Why? Because the class they will push will be illegals. I’m sorry, “migrants.” Good luck with that because that route exposes them even more. If they want to get in front of a judge and court and try to rally the millions of illegals to sign onto a “class-action” to say that being here illegally is there right….so be it. I don’t think it goes over well.
I’m not a lawyer, however, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express a few months ago.
This is so HUGE.
Absolutely no surprise who the dissenters are.
Sonya Sotomayor is a total Latina disgrace. And I am a Latino saying it.
I gotta admit, I LOVED Amy Coney Island Barrett calling out InJustice Jackson as DDS (Dumber than Dog Sh*t).
And at lease for now we bid adios, see ya in Gitmo to
Beryl Howell
Amy Vermin Jackson
James Boasberg
Brian Murphy (Hey Judge Dirtbag, in case you need an intrepretation of this ruling YOU LOST!!!).
Lawfare got one of their legs chopped off. Again, DJT had to navigate the Gambino crime family in its prime; during its heyday.
Comey Barret delivered the verdict and scolded Jackson in CAPITALS!
There were several concurring opinions, and a dissent joined by the Court’s three liberal justices, including a separate dissent by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has become the Court’s resident left-wing activist.
Jackson wrote:”The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.” She derided the Court’s cited precedents in common law at the Founding as “inapt comparisons to impotent English tribunals.”
Barrett dismissed Jackson’s dissent sternly: “We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which
is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself.
We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/06/27/supreme-court-ends-abuse-of-injunctions-no-more-judicial-supremacy/
Not to mention the number of times Brown said she didn’t understand things.
What’s up with CJ Roberts? The very same man that made a mandate into a tax (Obamacare), is backing a decision that stops the very thing that RINOs, Neocons, and Communists want. I’m confused.
Well, to be fair, the Cartels money laundering banks are being targeted. Maybe Robert’s knows his money may be cut off or that if the FBI keeps digging the money may lead back to him.
Hi Lisa Monaco
Wanna share with us WHO signed up KBJ with that autopen?
Who knows….maybe it was you
Love the bodyslam of DEI Jackson by ACB. Hopefully they keep pointing out her incompetence in their future rulings, humiliating and ostracizing her into eventually resigning.
A supreme court justice that cannot describe what a woman is has shown that she does not understand anything else either.
My understanding is that now the Dems will file class action suits addressing the EOs.
Can someone with knowledge of how that works explain if it takes a long time to get to a judge in a class action case?
Would a judicial opinion in favor of a class of people (say illegals) cover everyone in the US who falls into that class?
If they can pick the judges, what have we gained?
yes, its a problem more now than ever that judges are selected, not based on objective review of the law and constitution, but of political cause and ideaology. It most certainly is a danger to this nation.
I wrote to this issue, when issuing a “warning”: we dodged a bullet…this time.
what I meant by that is that yes, celebrate this decision because its a good decision. But it’s certainly not the end of ideological and political judges. Far from it.
we dodged a bullet, BECAUSE in its present form, SCOTUS has barely enough black robes who actually know the law, were educated well enough to recognize what article 2 powers really are and the role, limited versus unlimited lower court judges have to stymy or not the powers of the President.
it’s most ironic, and a comedic tragedy, that the likes of Jackson would see an outcome where judges and not the people who elected the President should have a say in how he leads, while decrying some vapid nonsense about a threat to democracy.
she’s not just wrong on the constitution and law, but fails to even consider the problems that would be caused if judges were allowed to make sweeping limits on a duly elected Presidents’ powers to enforce the very laws set forth by Congress, AND whom was properly elected in the very campaign promises that he made transparent, and was in no small way elected to fulfill.
as the old Saturday night live skit would have it: “Jackson, you ignorant slut”
we just got lucky THIS TIME. the left radicals have no plans to fold the tent…they will persist in every possible way imaginable and even some that we might not even consider possible to thwart President Trump. They are married to chaos and anarchy, because they have experienced no consequences for this behavior. I propose that this must change.
while I have zero respect for President Lincoln, with respect to his suspension of habeas corpus, I will remind that there was a period when he did in fact order jail time and detention to hundreds of people, estimated at around 300, mostly journalists. I do not believe in the war that Lincoln sponsored. History would prove his mission was not even close to some moral compass. jailing voices who opposed the war and exposed the corrupt motives were not merely silenced but jailed and punished. Without rights to due process..with no warrant or judge overseeing the protections and rights that would normally be afforded. I disagree about this action, because it is my opinion that what President Lincoln was trying to protect against was the truth about the motives behind the war.
now stepping forward in time, we have the exact opposite problem. lawless judges who are attempting to subvert the powers of the president AS WELL THE PRESS, not based on truth, but on political ideaology. And this time, it IS CREATING A CIVIL WAR OF ANOTHER KIND: the protection of criminal illegal aliens who have no rights and no lawful basis for even being in this country.
think about this. And the differences between Lincoln and Trump…carefully compare the two and what they were trying to protect.
Lincoln – protecting a lie and a corrupt motive in order to create war and transfer power. and did so by ordering the imprisonment of any journalist who dared to speak out against those lies.
Trump – exposing a truth and protecting US citizens against an invasion that also includes a lawless tranche of judges and media giants who are hell bent in protecting the “replacement agenda”.
if there was ever a good reason to lock up lawless judges or at a minimum to force them out by impeachment…it would be now….I would also agree with charging some media organizations with several different kinds of crimes as well….particularly in the instance where its obvious they are manufacturing lies in order to create division and unrest in this country.
the gloves need to come off. soon.
we just got lucky. we don’t need to tempt fate and believe in luck alone.
stage 4, revolution: transfer of power. Yes, judges and media are precisely targeted in this stage. And it is my view, that the timing is right to start rounding up these scofflaws in any way imaginable. Not for President Trump…for us, we the people, this nation, the citizens. for US!
God Bless America
I want a class action suit on behalf of the American people who endured a fake election in 2020, and suffered egregious torture during the Biden administration.