We all knew the system would strike back. There are trillions at stake.
UPDATES AT BOTTOM: A federal trade court based out of New York has just ruled in a three-judge decision that President Trump does not have the authority within the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to initiate emergency trade tariffs. [The Ruling is HERE]
WASHINGTON DC – A federal trade court ruled President Trump didn’t have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs on virtually every nation, voiding the levies that have sparked a global trade war and threatened to upend the world economy.
The decision on Wednesday from the Court of International Trade blocked one of the Trump administration’s most audacious assertions of executive power, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, and sets the stage for a possible appeal by the White House.
“The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder,” a three-judge panel wrote. (link)
“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the court wrote. The court also ordered that the tariffs that the Trump administration has collected so far be “vacated.”
UPDATE #1: I’m tearing through this ruling right now and I can find several structural flaws in the 3-judge panel decision.
[From Page 6, pdf] “…[…] in 1962, Congress delegated to the President the power to take action to adjust imports when the Secretary of Commerce finds that an “article is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security.” Trade Expansion Act of 1962, Pub. L. No. 87-794, § 232(b), 76 Stat. 872, 877 (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. § 1862(c)(1)(A)). This delegation is conditioned upon an investigation and findings by the Secretary of Commerce, and agreement by the President. See id. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, requires that the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) take action, which may include imposing tariffs, where “the rights of the United States under any trade agreement are being denied” or “an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country” is “unjustifiable and burdens or restricts United States commerce.” 19 U.S.C. § 2411(a)(1)(A)–(B). The USTR may impose duties also where the USTR determines that “an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce.” Id. § 2411(b)(1). This power is conditioned on extensive procedural requirements including an investigation that culminates in an affirmative finding that another country imposed unfair trade barriers under § 2411(a)(1)(A) or (B) or § 2411(b), and a public notice and comment period. See id. § 2414(b).”… [source]
I’ve just gotten started, but that citation is just one reason why the ruling can be overturned on appeal.
The Sec 301/302 investigation and process noted above was completed by USTR Jamieson Greer, with extensive citation. USTR Greer published a 397-page investigative outcome detailing the “unreasonable and discriminatory” burdens to United States commerce. [SEE HERE pdf]
The New York trade court literally ignored the 2025 USTR investigation, AND the 2025 Dept of Commerce review and investigation of the same based on the USTR published findings. All of those factual investigative findings underpin the Presidential actions taken pursuant to his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
It looks like the trade court didn’t even review the USTR reports.
The USTR link to review all of the legal and trade details on the Trump tariffs IS HERE.
Is there any pro-America policy these various “courts” will not oppose?
You are kidding, right?
Rouge rogues don’t yet fear the law-abiding.
jump on over to the truth that these courts are activist courts, on top of being anti trump. eff em.
Keyboard clean up in progress.
LOL
The Courts, being the Judiciary, are a part of the Gummint.
That quote about “,..when the Gummint fear the people, ..” comes to mind. The Courts don’t fear the people, they have contempt for us.
They need to fear us.
One way or another
“Is there any pro-America policy these various “courts” will not oppose?”
Sorry, MAGA isn’t the Blob’s mission.
You are now seeing here the USAID (CIA) “Rule of Law” technique which as Mike Benz has pointed out in their definition means lawfare against democratically elected officials, these days primarily populists/nationalists, one of their color revolution tools formerly used in other countries. It was prepositioned by their other Blob tools, especially the last regime, but the RINOs are definitely not exempt, in preparation for any true boat rocker POTUS that might be miraculously elected and actually sworn in.
Prophetic:
“The World is a Corporation” (Network, 1976) (6:18)
“You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations, there are no peoples, there are no third worlds, there is no West…there is no America, there is no democracy, there is only IBM and ITT and AT&T and Dupont, DOW, Union Carbide and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today…We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies.”
Concurrence…
The Supreme Court’s 1936 Curtiss-Wright decision affirmed that the President has vast foreign affairs powers independent of Congress that are only subject to any restrictions contained in the Constitution itself. The decision said the President’s authority over foreign affairs are the “plenary and exclusive power of the President as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations–a power which does not require as a basis for its exercise an act of Congress“. It sounds like the IEEPA should be interpreted much more narrowly than this court did today, and maybe even should be more narrow to the point the IEEPA should not have been enacted in the first place.
The taxing power seems pretty central to the role of Congress in our republic. In fact it requires the House to initiate all taxes. I get that you love these tariffs — does that mean shred the Constitution to get them?
Was busy with random life stuff the past few hours and just now heard about this.
Do these mfers never sleep?
Their ideal POTUS would have no actual power.
Thank you, Sundance, for being the Watcher on the wall.
The last president didn’t. His auto pen ran the country.
Demons don’t sleep.
Until a Dem is back in office, then anything that he does is automatically constitutional, like student loan forgiveness. “Damn the Supreme Court, full speed ahead in trying to bribe graduates to vote for me!”
There is no President of The President. They are “the not president.” How is this not the Alpha and the Omega of the issue?
Perhaps they adjudicate government policy on behalf of some other government?
Who do they work for? Who sent them? Who pays them?
Soros, Soros and Soros! Why does Soros money have power over EVERY political office holder in America?
I notice the IL legislature passes laws in defiance of SC rulings (and their own constitution)…. And the Dem governor signs them. There are no boundaries they won’t cross, it appears.
And IL’s weak SC just says “now now, stop doing that…” but won’t over rule.
The IL legislature and state government is hopelessly dominated by the Chicago contingent led by Pritzker. There ain’t nobody “bigger” than J.B.!
LITERALLY 🤣🤣🤣
Nobody shorter and fatter so far.
Isn’t their verdict an insurrection?
So as a country we can’t set tariffs to protect our economy? All other countries are free to do so? Will appeals take 2 or 4 years?
So you disagree with “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States;”
Tarriffs were always one sided approach, and also the “easy” approach.
It affected imports only… or the demand side, with not a whole lot of policy on the on the home-front side
That is, if the USA as a country wishes to On-Shore critical industries, they need to ensure the country is super attractive and welcoming for those industries by having the RIGHT skilled people willing to do the jobs at a competitive price and little red tape.
As in, where were the policies to stimulate Education, Tax breaks on companies in verticals etc.?
Yes, this home-front approach is a going to be COSTLY (in effort and work and time).
It will be a multi-decade project to turn the US around from being a hyper financialized economy, back into a production economy.
But guess what: It cant be blocked by judiciary, and its going to be helping the US be great in the long term.
In my view it is a better approach than coercing with tarriffs.
This should be what the “big beautiful bill” should be all about. But I havent heard anything on that front.
Not sure who advised Trump Admin to start a trade war with 180 countries at the same time. This were my thoughts on liberation day (“retardation day” as coined by George Gammon) and I still believe it was a bad call
Hey, do some research on Donald Trump; he is doing what he has been preaching for many decades. It’s all out there on YouTube videos. He has not changed. His words are the same.
It’s not a bad call by President Trump; he knows what he is doing and I have no doubt that he expected this globalist fight that we are living through.
You’re either with him and MAGA or against it. There is no half measures. He has to make this happen quickly so it will continue for generations.
Your response was much more measured than my own.
Then again, mine only required two words.
Ankle-biters are the worst, n’est-ce pas?
I have never seen anyone argue against diversification as a business strategy before; also better known as “not putting all your noodles in one single spaghetti dish”.
For diversification, tarriffs would have been perfectly well able to co-exist (for as long as they lasted) with a long term stimulation approach of critical industry verticals
For what its worth I find “You are with us or against us” is an absolutist small minded approach (no matter if its used by Red or Blue team) that in practice does not leave room for options and creative thinking, and is self-limiting.
All I am saying is tarriffs as a singular strategy were a bad idea, and if its the only idea then when it fails we have to live with the consequences of the entirity of the plan falling through and being blocked
Not too late to switch / develop alternatives though
Tariffs aren’t new in Trump’s vocabulary or worldview
Tariffs were THE official trade policy before the globalists grabbed hold of official US trade policy for the third time in 1913
The Fed is going bye-bye, and there’s nothing your team can do about it…SUCK. ON. THAT.
While I don’t disagree or agree with your thoughts on whether tariffs are good or bad that’s not the argument.
The question is does the court have the power over the President and tariffs?
According to the court they do.
According to the constitution they don’t.
Another attempt to lure POTUS to ignore the courts so they can impeach him.
They don’t need a pretext to impeach. They just need the requisite number of warm dem bodies to pull it off, just like last time.
I think too many miss the irony and brilliance of Trump’s approach. It’s not about tariffs. It’s about reciprocity.
Through the lens of the Trump approach, the counterparties have control of what tariffs they will pay. By applying a general doctrine of reciprocity to these complex dynamics, the countries who remove tariffs on the USA also remove our tariffs upon themselves by doing so, unless there is a profound strategic interest to defend. Not all tariffs are the same and many are of shallow purpose, parochial and political; not strategic.
Under the Trump doctrine, only the most essential interests remain protected by tariffs and only when the benefits of reciprocity tariffs outweigh the formidable direct and indirect costs of doing so. Reducing these costs and bureaucratic burdens seem to have disappeared from the public debate.
It puts the counterparties in control of the tariffs they pay and automates the process by fiat of policy… and does so without layers of consultants, agents, bureaucracy and contravening institutional parasitic structures like interloping NGOs serving global government establishment schemes.
It’s a brilliant approach. Replace a complexity-burdened, indolent mechanism with a self-regulating liberating structure that rebalances dynamically. This creates a new species of counterparty contracts and commerce balancing.
We don’t appreciate the massive costs in time, capacity, talent and capital the current global approach to tariffs requires to operate as a system. There will still be agonistic and painful tariffs where commerce interests are most imbalanced and highly valued, but they will be much fewer in number.
Bob Mendez, It’s my understanding this – tariffs – was one three prongs, all three to work together.
Now let’s see how well I listened:
One prong: Extending the 2017 tax breaks and implementing the new ones – to put more money in our pockets to spend – and IMHO to afford likely higher priced goods;
I believe DOGE – waste, fraud, abuse – cuts were the third stool. Sadly once again Congress is not supporting by legislating permanent cuts.
Sadly the big beautiful bill likely has self-canceling provisions, because “there are trillions at stake.”
And while I agree with you that there must be room for disagreement on policy and strategy; I think it’s vital to stand with/support this POTUS even when we disagree because of the nature of the battle. The full corruption of our republic is being exposed as he proceeds.
This leaves as the critical strategy for truly winning the battle, working to ensure reliably Constitutional candidates for local, county, state offices; and reliable and actual elections.
Winning the war requires eternal vigilance. (Just spend a few minutes in the Old Testament to be reminded of how quickly & frequently God’s chosen people forgot who their Source is; and how frequently they were reminded. Thus, the word eternal in that phrase.)
Ankle biters get kicked to the curb!
But they all get to have their say.
To ensure everyone has had their fill and cheers their departure.
Whatever rock you climbed up into this treehouse from misses its resident worm.
For someone posing as an expert, maybe you should learn to spell tariff.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Perhaps you have missed the whole point: this is a multi-pronged strategy.
If you wish to disprupt the Globalist Rules Based Order, you go with broad sweeping actions to disrupt their comfortable, stale positions. Now each nation must consider for itself….a move that weakens the Order and opens the door for new individual options.
The US Economy has been set up to derail this year (or next) by the Globalist Rules Base Order Element within our government. These tariffs have disrupted their comfortable stale positions, opening the door for renegotiations with our debtors (UST Bond Holders) that could destroy Globalists plan for our nation.
IF you want to restore manufacturing in your nation to save the economy and install a system for a viable future, you disrupt the status quo to push new available options on individual nations, weakening the Rules Based Order that is destroying you.
The tariffs are the first element that starts restoration. Internal elements of change cannot occur UNTIL there is external structural change. We are seeing the beginning of the external structural change with announced investments assisting the internal structural change. Shift how the money is generated/flowing and the internal changes will be less severe.
IMO, if these national leaders did not have serious respect for POTUS, NONE of this could be happening. They are taking a risk against the NWO.
Thank you.
There is no way to put a price on substandard goods! How about a simple measurement. Calculate how many new landfills were created once we started outsourceing manufacturing. The “stuff” we buy is JUNK and we have suffered immeasurably due to it. I’m all for the trade wars and bringing business home. There are plenty of people who can and will and want to do these jobs, once the jobs are here. Just travel through any small town in America and look at the devastation wrought by outsourcing everything.
Sundance writes:
“The New York trade court literally ignored the 2025 USTR investigation, AND the 2025 Dept of Commerce review and investigation of the same based on the USTR published findings. All of those factual investigative findings underpin the Presidential actions taken pursuant to his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
It looks like the trade court didn’t even review the USTR reports.
The USTR link to review all of the legal and trade details on the Trump tariffs IS HERE.”
My conclusion is that this 3 judge panel (and I don’t care who appointed them) are either: 1) Lazy
2) Stupid
3) Corrupt
4) Hate President Trump
5) Decided to invoke Lawfare strategy rather than conduct themselves judiciously and perform their tasks honestly.
6) Assume their judiciary powers supersede Presidential powers.
7) All of the above
Sad day for the United States of America.
S&P 500 Futures are soaring.
Despicable.
You forgot Compromised by foreign power dominated intelligence agencies.
Kompromat is the coin of the dark realm of DC.
That falls under #3) Corrupt; just trying to make it easy-peasy Maquis :).
Owned by Derps Domestic and Foreign is another level of control.
Kompromat can be developed with a non-corrupt individual.
Threats can be made quite credible too.
I get your drift, y’ain’t wrong, but, some of the onus must be on those that make puppets out of our people.
We should never lost sight of the necessity to follow the strings, for as you well know, it’s puppets all the way down, and we will get nowhere playing pinata with the closest ones, we need to turn eyes to the genuine corruptors running the Conspiracy.
Is DJT baiting the stock markets of the world? Big fall coming?
Have no idea. I learned decades ago to never underestimate him or his strategy, because just when you think you know what he’s up to, he changes strategies again and wins!
God surely blessed this man for this time.
The markets have been in over-valuation territory for some time….the euphoria phase is in full swing.
Buffet has sold lots of positions and is sitting on mega money awaiting the correction that was coming no matter who won the election.
IMO, POTUS is trying to mitigate that situation with his economic policy.
Look at their, along with their families’, brokerage accounts and see who bought SPY calls.
I always found multiple choice questions fairly easy.
The answer is #7 + despicable + some more =
I decided I needed to remove my equals part. I will let you add your own.
Is incompetence an impeachable offence?
They all hate the USA and it’s citizens. They will do anything to defeat any success to improve the life of everyday Americans. Only non-Americans matter. Never let the US Constitution or any laws get in the way of their marxist takeover.
As with everything with the commie dems the process is the punishment. What will it take to move the GOPe uniparty?
NY is cursed for so many reasons.
Well, I know at least 5 for starters.
The judges of this nation are in full panic mode. The President was elected and THEY WERE NOT !
What is really going on are reactive rulings made in desperate haste without careful consideration.
We are seeing clearly the elites don’t want the American people making choices with which the elites strongly disagree.
We are watching the self-destruction of the American judicial system by panicked jackasses wearing black robes. The Leftists may be cheering at the moment but the American people are going to put a stop to this tyranny as THEY PLAINLY SEE THEIR VOTES DON’T MATTER TO THE UNELECTED TYRANTS.
This is the BIG UGLY on full display.
A hundred arrogant judges cannot stand against a Commander in Chief leading an army 77 million strong.
It’s ugly.
But it ain’t the Big Ugly.
Sundance will let us know when we are actually seeing it, and he has indicated it will be at least in part when the truth of who owns our party, and how, cannot be hidden and silenced any longer.
Where the eff is the Supreme Court? This low level appointed state court over ruling a President and the Supreme Court remains silent? W T F!!!!!!
It’s a ConJob. Barrett.
Well, when you take the following into consideration it all fits into place.
CJ Roberts nominated Boasberg to the DC FISA Court.
Roberts and Boasberg belonged to an elitist invite-only lawyers’ club.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/todays-fun-fact-chief-justice-john-roberts-nominated/
Other members of said elitist group include judges Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown-Jackson. Those names are likely familiar to most Treepers.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/
Bottom line, though the dems scream about this being a “ultra conservative” Supreme Court, nothing could be further from the truth.
We have two reliably conservative Justices and their names are Clarence Thomas and Thomas Alito.
Did you fail to read the post? Congress, under its Constitution power to create “inferior tribunals” created this court as an Article III court with power over all cases in law and equity. In this case the court granted equitable relief. Like any case, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction.
As necessary as Biden’s Admin. and the 2020 Steal was for the American People.
Wow, 4 months and it’s already over.
And bammmo
✊ ✊ ✊
Yeah, that will all happen a year or more from now. Far too late.
To delay is to deny.
This idiotic case moved very quickly. So will the appeal.
@WallStreetMav
A court just claimed Trump lacks authority to set tariffs on trade, claiming it is a power of Congress. However the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 gave the President authority to do exactly that. Crazy courts ignoring laws and other court rulings.
Have millions of illegals pour over the border.
Obligate legal US citizens to pay billions for their upkeep.
No problemooooo.
Said it before and I’ll keep repeating it. If Trump allows these courts to dictate his presidency and goes along with their rulings rather than telling them to piss off, his 4 years will be an abject failure. I can only speak for myself, I voted for him to take a sledgehammer to the entire system not play nice. Enough is freaking enough of these judges seizing power they never should have.
IMO, continue on mission and task John Sauer to deal with the legal stuff. He’s doing a great job so far.
This topic gives PDJT yet another big space of free media attention to continue with his messaging to we the people.
Living behind Communist lines I’m very sensitive to everything, even the slightest noise or movement. Lately, even this past holiday weekend, it’s been very quiet. Very uncharacteristic for a Commie vacation area. A lot of their homes are here, empty.
I think PDJT will do fine. We have his back. Standing by here, training and preparing every day. The mental part is the hardest. It was for my dad too. He prayed a lot. I use his rosary regularly. It served him well in Italy.
I miss those parts, pretty country.
Used to be our weekends not dedicated to working ourselves to death were divided between the coast and the desert.
Can’t do the Commie thing though.
And, I’d like to know WHY he’s doing this!
So if Congress didn’t delegate their power to set tariffs to the President why did they subsequently pass several laws outlining how the President should use the delegated power?
So, this was a simple Board then in 1926 is was renamed Custom Court, then in 1980 renamed what it is today, seems they thought maybe they had to head off Reagan, but never needed to. Congress gave the President this power, and thus it will take a 2/3 vote to take it away. So, how can Congress then in 1980, set up what amounts to a Board who can overrule the President, but set it up with only 51 votes, or even 60, but not the 67 needed? So, can Congress take away the Presidents Authority over the Military by setting up a Military board with 51 votes? If you need 67 votes but set up a board (call it a Court) which needs only 51 votes, imho, that an illegal thwarting of the Presidents authority, granted unto him by Congress. This is more Lawfare, if this was a real authority, they would have ruled against Trump in 2016/17. This is more BS Lawfare.
<1926 is was renamed Custom Court, then in 1980 renamed what it is today
Not “renamed”. It was converted from an administrative law Article I court to an Article III court, having the full power of Article III.
And by the way don’t forget the power of Congress “To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;”
I say the US is a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
It’s getting close.
Time to get vocal with those afflicted with TDS.
You know-in a CIVIL kind of way.
Why do we keep shielding these traitors posing as judges. I would like to see photographs of their faces, where they live and who appointed them. We know that soros is behind many of them. I would like to have a photo collage of all soros backed traitors to put on my dart board! We need more than sunlight, we need a spotlight to illuminate them. Justice Roberts must be compromised to allow this to continue. GOD bless America and GOD bless President Donald J. Trump.
I’m not sure why your post has not yet received multiple “thumbs up.” It makes clear & complete sense; more sunlight! These scrupulous bastards need to be exposed for all freedom-loving Americans to see and verbally berated for acting like the POSs (plural) traitors that they are. Oh! That’s right. My bad. Sorry. The Marxist infiltrated MSM is not going to write, print or do anything that may be harmful to their anti-American movement and providing sunlight upon their filthy agenda would do just that.
Here are the names
Chief Judge Mark A. Barnett – Obama
Judge Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. – Regan
Judge M. Miller Baker – Trump
Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves – Obama
Judge Richard K. Eaton – Clinton
Judge Leo M. Gordon – Bush
Judge Gary S. Katzmann – Obama Ruled against Trump
Judge Claire R. Kelly – Obama
Judge Joseph A. Laroski, Jr. – Biden
Judge Timothy M. Reif – Trump Ruled against Trump
Judge Jane A. Restani – assumed office in 2015 so I assume Obama. Ruled against Trump
Judge Timothy C. Stanceu – Bush
Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden – Nominee Deputy Sec of Ag
Judge Lisa W. Wang – Biden
George
@BehizyTweets
Since the so-called International Trade Court just ruled that Trump doesn’t have the authority to impose tariffs. I have no choice but to make this thread literally pointing out that not only does he have the authority, but it’s VERY BROAD.
Those dumb judges should read this.
Cont reading thread….
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1927890545893924871.html
There is an interesting constitutional issue. All federal Judges “… shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour …” which implies they cannot and do not hold office when not in good Behavior. This further implies no ruling or action shall result from less-than good Behavior and would therefore be void and without lawful effect.
This does not appear to be a simple matter of judicial error. The misconduct and gross negligence demonstrated by these judges seem to be conclusive evidence the court’s judges in this case did not hold their office during good Behavior. This appears to be self-evident. If so, the action is void.
If so, Trump could proceed unburdened by corrupt judicial process.
Wall Street Mav
@WallStreetMav
A court just claimed Trump lacks authority to set tariffs on trade, claiming it is a power of Congress.
However the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 gave the President authority to do exactly that.
Crazy courts ignoring laws and other court rulings.
Cont…
Voice of Sanity
@HouseofElon
Concur; the Judge got this terribly wrong (shocker, I know).
While Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” & to regulate commerce with foreign nations,
Congress has historically delegated some of its tariff authority to POTUS, particularly in situations related to national security or trade disputes.
As examples: Sections 232 & 301 of the Trade Act of 1962, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), authorize POTUS to take certain actions, including imposing tariffs, under specific circumstances. Basically:
Sec. 232 allows POTUS to impose tariffs on imports, if they’re deemed to threaten national security;
Sec. 301 authorizes POTUS to retaliate against unfair trade practices by imposing tariffs on imports from other countries;
And, the IEEPA grants POTUS the power to impose economic sanctions, including tariffs, in response to national emergencies.
Cont….
“It looks like the trade court didn’t even review the USTR reports.”
Dang it. Just when I misplaced my shock face, too.
‘We all knew the system would strike back. There are trillions at stake.’
Pure Marxian BS.
FYI, the people attempting to stop Trump are cultural-Marxists aka Blairites/progressives.
The aim of cultural-Marxism is the complete deconstruction and annihilation of America, the West, Western civilization, Christianity, and ‘whiteness’:
Population-replacement on a biblical scale, the remaining population mass indoctrinated to self-hate, forced to view their whole existence as a nexus of oppression, and systematically encouraged to embrace destructive and degenerate behaviour. White/Western minds saturated with subversion and indoctrination.
White/Western boys and girls systematically encouraged to think of themselves as the opposite sex. In many cases, their sexual organs ripped away like something out of Jack the Ripper.
The new frontline is Ukraine. Cultural-Marxists won’t stop until Eastern Europe and Russia [‘the last bastions of Christianity, conservatism, and whiteness’] are saturated in gender and racial diversity.
The violent coup d’état in 2014 in Ukraine was fully backed and supported by the far-left in the West who are pushing their civilization-destroying agenda right up to the borders of Russia.
Putin stood up to the militant LGBT+ activists in 2013 during the build-up to the Sochi Olympics which was the exact moment when the far-left in the West turned on their old ideological ally. It sent the cultural-Marxists absolutely batsh*t.
Everything has switched:
Before 1990 the West was Christian and conservative.
After 1990 the West became atheist and cultural-Marxist.
Before 1990 Russia was atheist and Marxist.
After 1990 Russia became Christian and conservative.
This is a prescient analysis and will be held to be transformative because they are attempting to utterly destroy Western order by usurping our own discourse and replacing it with a complete negation which is being accomplished in a subterfugal way which is then not understood by almost all of our population. And now everything is suffering an inversion which can only result in disaster for us if we continue to countenance such inverse thinking.
Both you and AntonyG are so correct. And yet, what is so disheartening is the fact that so many people in our country are TOTALLY oblivious of these facts. Totally.
Our education system has been dumbed down to such a point that our schools (indoctrination camps) are graduating students that can’t even read – or write – let alone developing the ability to even comprehend the differences between Marxist/Communism and real freedom provided by our Constitutional Republic.
Yet we must keep fighting, shouting from the rooftops or quietly speaking to a neighbor over the fence or we, as a nation and the last beacon of hope are DONE! And then what? Do I dare say?
I guess we’re a Judicial Republic now.
You’re generous calling it a Republic.
Judicial Oligarchy, IMO.
What would happen if the Executive just ignored what lower courts demanded? Initially, I thought that much of this was a ‘set up’ in order to have Trump held in contempt, by not following a ruling, which would allow impeachment #3 to begin in Congress. We learn about ‘checks and balances’…where is the ‘check’ on rogue inferior courts? If such a court demanded that President Trump wear red socks daily, must he do so as his appeal on this ruling begins? It appears to me that, for some reason, it is far easier to ‘check’ the President, than it is to ‘check’ inferior courts….???
How about a 175 trillion budget. that should make them happy, give everybody and everything 20 billion, they have no problems with that
Obviously going to be overturned
This is a big one and must be set right. Here is what we absolutely cannot lose or we lose the country: the great tariff correction, the house bill, the 2026 mid-terms, and border and immigration control. These are the four pillars of success. Lose one and you lose the rest.
I’d say this is another one of those “inferior” courts that Congress needs to abolish or rein in on subject matter jurisdiction
In this episode of the Charlie Kirk show Bill Federer tells the audience that President Kennedy instituted tariffs. Who knew? https://thecharliekirkshow.com/podcasts/the-charlie-kirk-show/no-debt-goes-forever-unpaid-ft-dr-bill-federer
okay………what’s the workaround?
Any ideas?
Goldman Sachs economists are saying the White House has several options to employ as a workaround to keep tariffs in spite of this court’s ruling.
The below article walks thru these options: Section 122 of U.S. trade law, Section 301 investigations and Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/29/trump-expected-to-find-a-workaround-after-trade-court-blocks-tariffs.html
Perhaps the judicial dopes are roping themselves?
Layers of options remain to whack these moles exposing themselves.
Exposing their Kompromise remains a high hope for me, the Conspiracy must be excised.
Trump should issue his own restriction, by executive order, that the trade court be ignored until they comply with federal law. He needs to do the same with the other activists who violated immigration laws that preclude judicial review. What really needs to happen is for the DOJ to arrest these judges who violate federal law instead of appealing their lawlessness to a higher court. If the courts break the law they need to be immediately held accountable.
The Democrat Resistance continues. Where’s the Roberts court?
Ignore them.
Sundance, you’re a wonder. You mention appeal. Under actual law, I’d rejoice but we can’t even count on the supreme to be fair.
Trump needs to issue an EO stating that this court has “no standing”.
More theater to distract you from the takeover of your state and local governments and courts.
As I read this 3 judges are deciding that we are not in a national emergency. Where do they get that authority?
Tariffs are a critical component foreign policy, which is executed by the President and allowed by law as pointed out. This is nonsense and will be thrown out.
Typical New York anti-Americanism. They’re the heart and soul of globalism on the east coast. I remain confident that this ruling can be overturned on appeal.
Dow futures were up over 500 last night. The whores at CNBC.com posted this headline at the time: “Futures soar over 500 following Trump Tariff decision, Nvidia beat”.
Dow futures are now up about 100 and the whores’ revised headline is: “S&P futures gain as court blocks Trump Tariffs, NASDAQ futures jump after Nvidia’s strong earnings…”
Even Wall Street globalist scumbags see this ruling for what it is – a political stunt heading for extreme reversal.
Ignore and continue. These courts have no standing. Am I doing this right?
Are these guys (the trade court) even lawyers? Ur seems debatable.
Reports, schmreports – the Court is just re-establishing the status quo because reasons. Like Sundance says “there are trillions at stake”. It’s also a ploy to get the Trump administration to just forge ahead and ignore the courts so that the Dems can claim that Trump is “acting like a dictator”, even though it appears his administration has jumped through all of the hoops required to apply the punitive tariffs. The Dems are now in the “we have to ignore the law to uphold the law” phase of their devolution.
Just call the tariffs sanctions, all fixed.
“Presidential sanctions are actions taken by a US president, often through an executive order, to impose economic or other restrictions on a country, individuals, or entities, typically to enforce US foreign policy objectives or address national security concerns.”
I think many of us recognize the truth – if we don’t stop these rogue judges, Trump’s entire agenda dies on the vine.
Crickets from Congress. Crickets from SCOTUS.
They’re hoping Trump defies the courts – they may get their wish.
There will be no relief from Congress unless the Dems wake up one day pledging to not filibuster anything 😎
SCOTUS is a chance…but only if Thomas and Alito threaten Roberts with being exposed unless he finds his spine.
I’m waiting to read the new Constitution, because we the people see that judges, all over the country, are now in charge over the Executive Branch and the Supreme(?) Court. The corporate Democrat Media are their enforcers and promoters. Universities, governors, state legislators, bureaucrats are openly defying President Trump’s Executive Orders, so that they mean nothing, and nothing has been done towards enforcement except threats of withholding funds, which has prompted never ending law suits. Congress could remedy this mess, but they apparently refuse to, like usual. With the Republican’ts in the majority refusing to act, I foresee a big Democrat win at the 2026 mid-term elections.
Someone one said and I paraphrase: The court has ruled, let them enforce it.
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/how-congress-delegates-its-tariff-powers-to-the-president
It is clear that the Judiciary is working against the USA and the Executive Branch. In many cases the Judiciary has issued rulings without time to actually read the case before them and to allow members of the Executive Branch to respond to what they say so the Judiciary is acting as a block.
This will ultimately make people’s view of the Judiciary drop low. Further the Executive Branch controls actions to and from the Judiciary with the Marshalls, Prisons, DOJ, and other groups, which can be used to limit the Judiciary if they wanted to. It is clear that all countries have tariffs on the USA and we did not on other countries.
COVID showed the China produced the virus and Big Pharma vaccines for COVID were produced in China so there was a National Security issue. Industries are gone from the USA due to costs and tariffs will bring them back. Industry is a National Security issue. President Trump realizes this for our country.
What gives a court jurisdiction over foreign trade policies?