When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.
In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”
The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.
At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents.
After President Trump won the 2016 election, he gave DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz authority to conduct oversight over the DOJ-NSD. IG Horowitz started investigating the FISA application. This is where things get interesting.
The FISA Court (FISC) was exposed by their willful blindness in allowing the Title-1 targeting of Donald Trump.
Justice John Roberts is in charge of the FISC.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts then appointed Judge James Boasberg to the position of presiding judge over the FISA Court (FISC).
Judge Boasberg then selected Mary McCord to be an amicus or advisor to the court as Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application.
Boasberg put the person who was in charge of submitting the false FISA application in a position to filter the results of the Horowitz investigation of that same FISA application.
In essence, think of this as protecting the Judicial Branch. Justice Roberts appointed Boasberg to defend the FISC from scrutiny. Boasberg then moves Mary McCord into position to defend the FISC from scrutiny (McCord also protects herself).
At the time, Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook was working within Justice Robert’s office.
That’s how John Roberts, James Boasberg and Mary McCord all connect. All the motives and intents go back to that original Title-1 FISA application.
Remember, this was a huge scandal all by itself. The FISA Court permitted a full-throated surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The Judicial Branch was intentionally influencing the 2016 election. These are not stupid people; they were not duped, conned or fooled, they knew exactly what they were doing.
After appointing Mary McCord to take up a defensive position for herself and the FISA Court (cover), Judge Boasberg then becomes the presiding judge in the case against the FBI agent who falsified the FISA application, Kevin Clinesmith. Boasberg gives Clinesmith a slap on the wrist and a few months’ probation (more cover).
This is the same Judge Boasberg gave J6 FBI agent provocateur Ray Epps a sentence of probation. This is the same judge who, on his vacation, went to sit in the DC courtroom to observe defendant President Trump who was forced to appear in DC court. This is the same Boasberg who established a horrible precedent by forcing Vice-President Mike Pence to testify before a DC grand jury about his conversations with President Trump (breaking executive privilege).
♦ Now we go back to the John Durham investigation, because Bill Barr had to ask Presiding Judge Boasberg for guidance and direction as the Durham team looked at the FISA application (Title-1 surveillance warrant) against the backdrop of the Obama government targeting Donald Trump.
This is June of 2020, Bill Barr (who was running another cover-up angle) asked Judge Boasberg for guidance on five very specific issues centering around the Carter Page FISA application. Barr asked for legal guidance to assist John Durham in disclosing information in the FISA file & evidence attached to the FISA file.
The five issues all circle around the FBI/DOJ use of the Carter Page FISA application; and, more importantly, the underlying evidence that is attached to the FISA application. [source]
I. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to FOIA demands. FISC gives legal opinion
II. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material due to ongoing and anticipated civil litigation. The FISC gives legal opinion and expands to criminal litigation.
III. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to internal investigative units from the FBI inspectors division (INSD). FISC gives opinion and advice.
IV. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of non-minimized information, and/or, minimized information as part of the ongoing Office of Inspector General oversight. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
V. DOJ requests guidance for distribution of material to John Durham probe, both for criminal prosecution and possible evidence gathering attached to other ongoing investigative needs. FISC gives opinion and guidance.
Now, keep in mind, with hindsight we know the DOJ (Bill Barr) was essentially walking a fine line between uncovering information and trying to protect the DOJ as an institution. John Durham was never approved to investigate the government side of the Trump-Russia collusion nonsense.
At the same time, Judge Boasberg is trying to protect the FISC from their culpability and also protect the FISA Court as an institution. Everyone has an agenda here, and none of them are good.
That leads to Boasberg outlining a cautious approach toward distribution and/or sunlight on what took place. On this issue the court says allowing a target to escape prosecution is part of the penalty upon the DOJ for wrongful assembly; a nice way to cover the issue.
Judge Boasberg does not consider the DOJ is targeting the “assemblers” for their criminal conduct. Rather his response is general toward criminals who were targets of a FISA application assembled with corrupt intent. It seemed a little weird at the time, now notsomuch.
Pages #11 and #12 hit the topic of FOIA production. Boasberg says “some” FOIA requests might warrant document distribution, but not all. However, on the topic of Carter Page getting his FOIA fulfilled, the court supports expansive distribution to Mr. Page alone.
I find the arguments and issues in/around page #14 to be especially noteworthy. In this segment Judge Boasberg is responding to the underlying raw evidence that would normally be used to assemble a “woods file”. The court notes the FBI Sentinel system would contain the minimized outcomes (redacted evidence) and this points to a bigger issue.
In response to this inquiry Judge Boasberg notes FBI investigators would have access to the minimized information within the Sentinel system; however, insofar as there was additional inquiry into the raw and non-minimized intelligence, a review and distribution would be permissible so long as there was a strong filter team in place to ensure statutes surrounding FISA securities (minimization requirements) were not violated.
Overall, Judge Boasberg gives permission and approval for all six aspects Bill Barr requested. However, he does so with several legal qualifiers and distinctions which the DOJ was told to observe. Those qualifiers were intended to protect the interests of both Main Justice and the FISA Court from sunlight upon their prior conduct in 2016.
SUMMARY – Judge Boasberg has been demonstrably political in all his determinations going all the way back to his position on the FISC when the FISA application was approved. Boasberg was then moved into position to protect the FISC from the outcome of their Title-1 search warrant approval.
Boasberg then used his position as Presiding FISC judge to protect the apparatus, while using his position as DC Circuit Court Judge to diminish, obfuscate and cloud the severe ramifications from all of the DC effort, including his rulings on the Kevin Clinesmith (FBI Agent) and Ray Epps (FBI Source) cases.
Judge Boasberg sits at the epicenter of a thoroughly corrupt and compromised DC court system.
I like this approach recommended by Hokkada:
…”It’s important to remind people that the inferior courts do not work for or report to the Supreme Court. CONGRESS creates the inferior courts and as such, Congress can eliminate courts, add courts, and control funding of the courts. Congress also can impeach. And a key element of impeachment is the hearings process.
A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex. Could the end result be impeachment? Certainly.
But it could also lead to something better in the long run: descope of the Federal court system which has grown bloated, corrupt, and arrogant because it answers to nobody.
They’re the 3rd branch of government for a reason – they are not elected by anyone, and therefore hold the least amount of power when it comes to governance. SCOTUS doesn’t even control their own budget. They can’t levy taxes. They can’t declare war. They can’t decide what constitutes citizenship.
The answer to all of this is sunlight. Simply compel Biasberg to testify in open public hearings about his role in Lawfare and his interpretation of the Federal district court’s ability to direct the actions of the Commander in Chief, issue “nationwide injunctions” and so forth. Then let’s get into his direct role in Lawfare.
Roberts wants to pretend impeachment of Biasberg is about a “political disagreement”. But it is not. This is a judicial coup d’etat we are witnessing. And the only way to stop it is to descope the judiciary and limit its ability to issue injunctions.
If crimes are discovered, such as aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, the judges should be removed. Judges can “obstruct justice” too. They are not Jesus in black robes. They are every bit as tempted by corruption – perhaps more so because they are deemed infallible by the Chief Justice – as any politician.”…
If Mary McCord and husband Sheldon Snook haven’t had their security clearances pulled already then no one important is paying attention.
You shall know them by their scrubbed or altered on-line bio.
All roads lead back to Obama and his controllers.
Congress sucks too.
They should be rapidly putting an end to all this corruption, theft, the attack on the Executive by the Judiciary and are they?
I saw the other day that Ted Cruz now has a podcast and he was interviewing Elon Musk.
So Elon is dropping one shocking truth bomb after another on Ted Cruz, and I’m thinking to myself “and what are you going to do about all this Ted?”
What good is sitting on your fat ass gathering information if they don’t do a friggan thing about any of it all?
Sunlight and exposure is great, but if it’s not followed by swift corrective action, then what good is it?
What I see here is a lot of half-assed effort to appease us by making it look like they are doing something in endless Kabuki Theater shows to justify their own existences in the Swamp.
I’m a Texan and very much appreciate your comment.
Posture+Bluster=Cruz
Spit
👊✝️👊
I studied Ted Cruz deeply when he was here in NH running for President.
I find him to be one the the greatest disappointments and losses in congress because Ted Cruz is actually a very intelligent man.
He could be a fierce warrior for us, and yet he chooses to not be one.
Rate him right up there with Crenshaw…
Smarts do not equate to good sense.
Ted was having the time of his life on that podcast..
Cruz is a tool and always has been worthless.
Cruz has had a podcast since the 1st Trump Impeachment.
Shows you how popular it is! I never heard of it until the other day, for good reason!
A medical analogy. There was a popular tv show, House MD several years ago. The show always presented these rare medical cases and then working the patient up to make the rare medical diagnosis. I watched a few episodes but had the same question I have in my practice: “ yeah, and what are you going to do about it?”. I find the medical world is OBSESSED with the diagnosis and once diagnosed they celebrate their victory. My interest is therapeutics; what we then do about these conditions. And knowing that many of these patients fall through the cracks and aren’t helped by many standards of care, we have to look for alternative treatments.
Many congress people love to talk about the problems but few ever offer solutions.
We need to know exactly who Obama’s installers/handlers are.
Here is Born-in-Kenya Obama’s official bio. It was his bio for 17 years. Two months after Senator Obama announced that he was running for the presidency it was still his bio. And then he changed his bio to state that he was born in Hawaii. And his “official” Hawaii birth certificate was a queer as a $3 bill. After a long chain of fraudulent acts, Hawaii’s Director of Health Loretta Fuddy attested to the authenticity of the birth certificate that she gave to Obama. Fuddy was then conveniently Ron Browned. (Dead women who fabricate US birth certificates for Kenyans tell no tales.) Obama’s White House birth certificate had the registrar’s stamp fraud (with the misspelled “TXE” and the happy face in Alvin’s signature) plus numerous forged aspects in the pdf file. Reed Hays, a forensic document expert, found this birth certificate to be “entirely fabricated.” After a long investigation Sheriff Joe Arpaio said, “Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number…. There is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that this President was born in Hawaii, or in the United States for that matter.”
President Trump does have a nuclear option:
Constitutional expert Dr. Edwin Vieira stated this about “Born in Kenya” Obama, who was not a natural born citizen.
“Obama will be nothing but an usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.” And with his oath of office “being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242. Dr. Vieira states, “Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4)…. Just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. ”
I kept waiting for President Trump #45 to annul everything that usurper Obama did–including his Supreme Court appointments of Sotomayor and Kagan, plus over 300 other federal judges. But alas he did not. But it’s not too late. It would be like dropping a nuclear bomb on lawfare.
You’re ignoring the opposite possibility which is at least as likely : that he was indeed born in Hawaii, but concealed the fact in order to reap all the benefits of being a foreign-born, minority student.
Either way he committed a crime in doing so, did he not?.
Doesn’t matter if he was born in Hawaii, or Oklahoma, or Arizona. Usurper Obama is still not an Article 2 Natural Born Citizen because both of his parents were not US citizens. (Kamala Harris has the same Article 2 problem.)
Usurper Obama’s short form birth certificate states that his father was Barack Hussein Obama. The short form birth certificate was fraudulent with a stolen birth certificate number. Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate that he put on the White House website states that his father was Barack Hussein Obama. And no matter who is speculated to be Obama’s biological father, Barack Hussein Obama is his father of record. Obama Sr was a Kenyan and a British Subject. Obama Sr was never a US citizen. Constitutional expert and attorney Mario Apuzzo stated, “Regardless of whether Obama’s biological father is Malcolm X, Obama’s legal father is Barack Obama Sr. and it will stay that way regardless of what Obama might attempt to do to change that. Obama is therefore not a “natural born Citizen” and not eligible to be President.”
And Judge Boasberg would be off the bench and looking for a job.
Like I suggested the other day, since I am physically sidelined from normal work these days and could really use some gainful employment the Administration could pay me to read CTH and walk from office to office in the FedGov and deliver real time intelligence and strongly worded pep talks..
Please someone tag Pam, Kash, Elon and PT with this thread.
Maybe this should be Pam’s first investigation?
Pam’s only investigation so far has been what to wear on Fox News every night.
Her days, as an exposed lightweight running DOJ, are hopefully numbered.
For the country and TRUMP ADM hope you are right and take KASH with her out the door.
Kash is busy doing Che Guevara commercials recruiting for the FBI.
Hopefully numbered – in single digits. What a disappointment she has turned out to be.
You expected something positive from her? Really????
Nope. Not really.
Trump has picked much better people this time around. He learned from his mistakes, but Pam Bondi isn’t one of them.
You wonder if this was a Floridian Susie Wiles pick because she totally blew the Chad Chronister as head of DEA. Chronister was a RINO Florida Sheriff by the way who said this out loud:
“I believe that Biden has won the election,” Chronister said in late November. “I believe Trump should concede. I don’t think anyone has provided any evidence of any fraud.”
Wow! No fraud in the 2020 Election?
Well, Obama and Biden said that too so Chronister must be OK, right, Susie Wiles?
Wiles and Blondi both worked at Ballard Consulting with, James Rubin of the Biden administration.
https://apnews.com/article/things-to-know-pam-bondi-eec1d16075c7debda62223b475e3977d
Pam is tuned into the attacks on Elon’s cars.. she’s said it’s domestic terrorism..
Elon’s cars being vandalized is a drop in the bucket compared to what these ‘Judges’ are doing.
Three plane loads of the worst gang bangers on the planet that a ‘judge’ wanted left here can do far more damage than the thugs going after Elon’s cars.
What’s your priority Pam?
AG Bondi Declares “Swarm Of Violent Attacks” On Tesla As Domestic Terrorism
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/tesla-terrorism-hits-las-vegas-service-center-leftist-lone-wolves-target-american-company
Saying something about it and doing something about it are two very different things.
Her nomination/appointment has boggled my mind from Day One….I feel like I’ve been giving her the chance to prove me wrong…and she might still get there…..being good on tv is useful but its a bit of a waste preaching to the choir on Fox….she needs to sway hearts and minds of the 48% that DIDN’T vote with us….. to SEE and renounce the corruption.
what happened to Mike Davis…..?🤔
CB, Mike Davis has said in interviews that he wants to remain on the outside of the administration, that he feels he has greater latitude and can accomplish more (those are my words, not his exact statement). I think he wants to be a firebrand. Regarding Barbie, are you sure that she is even “good on TV” because often her optics are way off, in my opinion.
Thanks for that…… I hadn’t heard Mike say that….as for Bondi, I haven’t had tv since Trumps 1st term so I only see clips that someone/entity has handpicked….
You’re welcome. He said it on TV LOL! He was doing a lot of interviews at first, some on Newsmax. I haven’t seen him recently, but he frequently posts on X. I’m not on X, but other sites post and I see them there. Definitely what I would call a firebrand.
She’s not even good on TV. She ‘s so fake.
Pam Barr Sessions will never do that. She was confirmed for a reason and she is playing that out . TRUMP better move her out or she will bring down the TRUMP ADM by doing NOTHING.
Funny, I made the argument that at least she was an upgrade over Barr for not outwardly sabotaging him. Maybe she’s Sessions 2.0.
Please keep posting your list of awaiting investigations…perhaps she’ll get that too. 👍
They can’t do much; should go to Jordan and Grassly who should open hearings exactly as was described. Make this guy answer all questions about Everything, in both committees. Then take it from there.
And someone should get to Roberts and tell him he’d better cut Boasberg loose lest he be brought down with him.
I was calling out this Constitutional Crisis for over a month now. The fake media had pre-spun the issue in the usual projection to prevent a harder call out by the base.
It has only gotten worse since, due to a corrupt and weak SCOTUS Chief that refuses to rein it in. They are as guilty as the judicial insurrectionists.
It is this rogue federal judiciary that has broken the rule of law. Intentionally, maliciously, and unconstitutionally.
We are well past the ‘Andrew Jackson’ point now.
Ignore these robed insurrectionists. They are powerless to enforce their rebellion against the Constitution and the Executive.
And lean hard on the Legislature to eliminate them, and on the organs of the Justice Department to thoroughly investigate them.
Most judges are at their core, lazy cowards, who hide behind their appointments to mask their intentional injustices.
Excellent from both Sundance and Hokkoda.
Here is my concern…
Yes, please drag Boasberg in for microscopic questioning….and any other “wannabe president” judge, one right after another, who daily lines up for his or her turn to hamstring the Executive. It is clear that Lawfare war is attempting to kneecap President Trump’s powers and legitimate constitutional actions.
This is a long overdue, necessary “colon cleanse” for that part of the three branch body which is so diseased that left untreated it could turn the nation into a permanent autocracy/oligarchy.
However this procedure is, like every other congressional undertaking, time consuming (months and more), and time is a luxury which President Trump does not have. Four years at best, two years at worst.
This Lawfare war needs to be stopped in its tracks right now. Or the dissolution of America and its Constitution, death by a corrupt judiciary, will continue while the remedy takes effect. Assuming of course we have a cooperative Legislative Branch to assist, itself not a given.
Where are the moral judges who could step in now. Are there any?
I’m scanning the horizon…and the clock is still ticking.
Judicial interference has been the left’s plan to oppose the Trump mandate from day 1. The Judicial branch must be put in its place as the media will never let up if it drags on.
Benjamin Wittes even put it in writing on the lawfare home page that that was the plan.
Absolutely true.
But imagine you’re a district court judge, and a Lawfare case lands on your desk. You know that similar cases have already been brought before the House for impeachment hearings.
Do you wade into that mess and risk facing impeachment charges yourself?
Or—stay with me—do you rule that the issue is outside the court’s jurisdiction?
What does that do to the clock?
That is something I am hoping for, Joe.
Even the corrupt surely have a sense of self preservation.
Go Bet! ❤️👀
👍🏻 😘
Yes.
Where’s The Cavalry, sis?
AWOL,dear brother.
Judicial activist judges go back a ways as a Democommunist Party strategy.
Then you have the Sorass bought and paid for, probably with your money, DA’s and judges.
There is a Wisconsin Supreme Court election, voting opened yesterday, where if the Democrat, openly an activist is elected, the WI Supreme Court will be fully in control of activists.
Not only will they throw out Scott Walker’s Act 10 reforms and make WI extremely expense for tax payers but they plan the following which has MAJOR NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS.
They are going to gerrymander a couple WI Republican congressmen out of existence. This will allow the Democommunists to gain control in Washington, DC.
I’m following this election with great concern. Hoping now that Dems have clearly lost all sense of sanity and are advertising their clear hatred of America and the people who keep her running and shop at Walmart, that those who comprise that demographic in Wisconsin will turn out en masse and overwhelmingly put a stop to the madness.
For that state, its future truly hangs on it.
…and as you say, ours.
There is great deterrent value in the Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader announcing an investigation of the judges themselves. That the plan is to compel testimony and that this testimony will affect pending legislation about the size and scope of the Congressionally-authorized inferior courts.
The plaintiffs should also be subpoenaed to determine their ideological motivations for abusing the Federal court system. Of note, I think Andrew Weissman – of Russia hoax game – represents the criminal killers from El Salvador. Andrew needs to be served a subpoena. Imagine that sunlight.
The best way to put Roberts in his place is to kneecap his buddies.
I’m sure America will enjoy hearing about the Lawfare cast of characters, and who is planted in Roberts’ office…
Thank you, Hokkoda…
It needs to be done, I agree, under the glare of klieg lights…and under oath.
For whatever that is worth given they have aborgated the oaths they took when they were sworn in.
Lights, Camera, Action!!
Let’s roll…😎
(I wonder how amicable to this uncovering John Thune is. Methinks he’d rather avoid it, but it is to be hoped he will not have the option to do so.)
Give it to Grassley/Judiciary and let him have fun with it.
Another Sundance masterpiece in connecting the dots.
Does Congress know it has the power of The Purse?
Asking for a friend.
The purse is important, but the most important message from Hokkada is Congress has the authority to limit what the inferior courts can ajudicate.
Congress can pass a law denying the courts ability to rule on any immigration law, as it should be. Congress can add a clause to most laws, which it never does, denying plaintiffs the ability to challenge the law in the inferior courts. You think a law is unconstitutional? Take it to SCOTUS.
If you think about it, the lower courts are a proxy put in place to undermine the executive by congress. The entire apparatus is unconstitutional, as in separation of powers.
I wonder if Pam truly opens up some investigations is she and Kash not only going to find massive money laundering but also treason/sedition?
I hope PT has gotten all the COMMS from Salt Lake.
Running out the clock.
President Trump being elected shows
us where we need to go in order to put a stop to a WHOLE LOT OF GOVERNMENT OVERREACH. Go straight to Justice Roberts. He has really put his self in the bullseye.
Start there and it will end the rest of the corrupt judges. It isn’t that hard. Roberts has got to go! See ya! Don’t let the door hit you in the ??? on your way out.
These judges think they are so smart. They will ALL be removed before President Trump’s term is over.
Criminal conspiracy.
Swat all three, roberts, McCord and Boasberg, 5 am, FBI, throw them in jail.
Sadly, it was originally felt that the Boasberg case would be the perfect one to appeal up to SCOTUS, as the ruling/injunction by this judge was so beyond the pale that SCOTUS would finally alleviate the judicial harm that ALL of these political ‘decisions’ are doing. However, it appears that this is not the case, considering the ‘relationship’ between Boasberg and Roberts. I know that a House Rep has already attempted to introduce an impeachment process against Boasberg. However, particularly as the Republicans have the majority in the House, this is the perfect time to follow Hokkada’s recommendation. These judges who think they are ‘president’ need to be stopped.
This is a massive political win for the republicans. No one is going to be able to defend not sending criminal gang bangers out of our country. This judge is going to be cooked in public opinion.
Yep, just like defending all the waste DOGE is revealing. They double down on stupidity.
The only thing that is good for is (hopefully) denying him advancement to the appellate court.
Unless congress acts now, to question this guy.
But will the republicans currently in office and/or running for office in 2026 even bring up this “win” narrative?
Chief Justice Roberts is defending it!
How can we get PT to sit down with Sundance for one hour?
Surely someone who reads CTH has connections, right?
Elon are you listening?
The concentric circles of silos around President Trump will never, ever, allow Sundance and therefore real TRUTH to reach him.
The First Lady reads CTH.. she smashes “silos”..
That’s at least hopeful.
How can we get PT to sit down with Sundance for one hour?
I was thinking Sundance needs to sit down with Joe Rogan for 3 hours going over this. Have his white board with timelines and principle characters to show how the same people like Mary McCord get moved into positions to provide the necessary cover etc …
sundance + tucker carlson or alex jones, or steve bannon,or all three !
But Sundance would be fully outting himself if he did that, then he becomes a giant target.
So then we need to wonder if he could continue on doing what he does if he did that..
He could be in silhouette with a modulated voice if need be. Like any whistleblower.
The main point though, is that he would need more than 1 hour to really go through this.
That toadie Mark Levin put Sundance out on Front Street years ago when he wrote something that blew Mark’s malfunctioning brain apart..
Mark Levin bugs me a lot.
He can be brilliant and then other times dumb as a brick.
Bingo.
he probably has.
When it comes to government, sunlight is good, and resisting sunlight is corruption.
While defenders of the district courts invoke Marbury to justify this judicial review, they fail to recognize that Marbury was with regard to SCOTUS.
The district courts exist only because Congress allows them to. If Congress ever had the political will (and the votes), it could “vaporize” them or radically change their jurisdiction. Right now, the only real protection for the district courts is the Senate filibuster. Without it, a simple majority in Congress, combined with a willing president, could reshape or even eliminate the lower federal courts entirely.
I hope and pray that Sundance’s map of intricate and dark inner government workings have gotten to the right people. Just when you think you have a grasp on things…..I have to believe that this is the reason sunlight isn’t being cast as PDJT has to have the right people around him and also seeded throughout the government AND cognizant of this nasty web of deceit and corruption at the highest levels. I must say though that I am ready to enjoy the show. Then perhaps America can really be great again…
X22 Report has referenced Sundance first Roberts/Boasberg article and reads the critical paragraph on air where Sundance provides the background of their relationship word for word.
Now if we can somehow get Sundance in front of PT for an hour or so.
https://rumble.com/v6qupqg-ep-3598b-trump-is-forcing-the-shadow-government-into-the-light-liberation-d.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Go back a bit further… to the farming out (overseas) of 702b spying on US citizens that Obama was doing during his term and leading up to the election to track the Republican opposition.
Admiral Rogers blew the lid off that… and was nearly buried for it. Congress listened, then whitewashed it by filing it in the “Mistakes were made” file. Some people did some things…
And no punishment for those accused at all then queued up an unfettered Spygate on Page, Trump Tower, the evisceration of Flynn, and the rest of the story.
These vermin have to be stopped cold or just as the sun will rise, they will do it again. It’s in their nature… and they now know they can get away with it if:
they add enough layersthey involve everybodyand everybody has something to lose
FOLLOW THE MONEY…………….
And the smell of BleachBit…
There was a Watergate burglar named John McCord, mentioned in the JFK assassination files. Any relation to Mary McCord?
James does not appear to be Mary’s father. Maybe a cousin, can’t tell because her history on the Internet doesn’t start until Georgetown.
“CONGRESS creates the inferior courts and as such, Congress can eliminate courts, add courts, and control funding of the courts. Congress also can impeach.”
The House can impeach with a simple majority vote, but that’s as useful as a sternly worded letter. Removal takes a 2/3 vote of the Senate and DOGE is taking away TENS OF BILLIONS of back-channel funding for the Manchurian Party, so that will NOT happen.
The Republican half of the UniParty only has, by design via methods (selectively ignoring fraud) and for a perpetual need (“We don’t have a sufficient majority”) I’ve previously detailed, a mere three seat majority in the House and one seat in the Senate.
BTW, I won’t go into the methods and reason for this in detail once again and give examples, but doesn’t it seem very odd to you that in a nation of 50 states with a population of 340 million that there are such slim margins of majority in CONgress? Also, consider the statistically unlikely number of incredibly close races you’ve probably seen. Just enough cheating to win, but no more?
“A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex. Could the end result be impeachment?”
Possibly, but just in the House and no one on their side, ESPECIALLY not their easily propagandized useful idiot constituency, will suddenly have an epiphany, care that what they’re doing is a violation of the separation of powers, say “Gosh, we’re sorry!” and stop doing what they’re doing. We’re taking away TENS if not HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS (as Musk says about just the likely amount of entitlement payments going to the ineligible) from their leftist slush funds.
The only way this is going to be forever FIXED is via the SCOTUS, but I suspect they won’t do that now because of this involving John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/18/president-trump-goes-scorched-earth-on-judge-boasberg-chief-justice-john-roberts-defends-boasberg/comment-page-5/#comment-11656114
A lesser alternative suggested by Karl Denninger:
So Where Are The Filings?
8 Mar 2025
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=252937
Trump’s Administration has finally taken notice of Rule 65(c) when it comes to Federal Courts:
(c) Security. The court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. The United States, its officers, and its agencies are not required to give security.
This is not discretionary and the court cannot assess a “de-minimus” security amount either; it must be defensible predicated on the costs and damages that the other party may or will suffer with the evidence of same in the order itself if the injunction or TRO issues until disposition of the case and the posting of said security has to be completed before the TRO or injunction is valid.
[snip]
Thus where is Pam Bondi with immediate emergency filings against all of the existing injunctions already issued demanding that security be posted up and computed in said public filing and, if there is any delay or refusal by the judges involved to do so taking an immediate emergency appeal as far as necessary including to the Supreme Court which, given the actual language in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a slam-dunk and immediate win? No, demanding this only on a forward basis for future filings is not enough — force the movants in all the existing injunctions to either post up security or dissolve the injunctions and TROs.
If our government expects we, the ordinary civilians, to adhere to and comply with the law they had better do so themselves especially when various parts of the government go to war legally with each other.
This is the mechanism! Has anyone posted this to Bondis X account?? Somehow I don’t believe she has any knowledge of it..
Let’s get the judge impeached by Congress and then have the Democrats in the Senate not support the impeachment.
Then we can throw them out at the election because they’re effectively standing up for illegal terrorist and murderers!
There’s certainly some merit in that approach.
These judges took an oath to abide by the Constitution, and they are violating it at every turn. Just sickening.
This will flow downstream to your State judges, and I submit it already has, where they see there are no boundaries to the lawlessness they can perpetrate on a party they don’t like. Jurors will feel emboldened to vote not guilty when there’s evidence of guilt, or vice-versa.
He may be anti Trump, but more importantly , he is compromised!!!
Nothing that some sunlight and a few arrests won’t change.
At some point someone will have to stand up for the people with a shock and awe arrest or we are done.
Or even Roberts didn’t deem her consequential enough to respond to. That may be a mistake though with some of the polling taking place. Hard to believe that after stacking so many losses the party would coalesce around AOC.
Congress is too quiet. Seems to me that Trump needs to head over there and find out when Judiciary is going to start subpoenaing these judges and the various Lawfare lawyers.
Sunlight. Drag these robed autocrats off their thrones and demand answers to why they think they can issue these politically-motivated injunctions against the Executive Branch.
And keep in mind that these are coequal branches. Trump needs his AG to get a clue and start corruption investigations against the judges…
She can’t, she has always been in the system. She’s made all of the same moves as people in the system, so she’s compromised.
I know, I know…it’s sad. In an ideal world we’d have a federal grand jury empaneled and issuing subpoenas to the FISC judges to get to the bottom of how those illegal Trump wiretaps were authorized by the Court.
On the usefulness of CONgressional shows from my comment above:
No one on their side, ESPECIALLY not their easily propagandized useful idiot constituency, will suddenly have an epiphany, care that what they’re doing is a violation of the separation of powers, say “Gosh, we’re sorry!” and stop doing what they’re doing. We’re taking away TENS if not HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS (as Musk says about just the likely amount of entitlement payments going to the ineligible) from their leftist slush funds.
Why are CONgressional shows so useless?
First, note how many times many of the 24 Liberty Score D and F-rated RINOs in the Senate have been reelected.
Then, in this video she points out stupid contradictions on the same ballot seen during manual recounts – voting for both far right and far left candidates on the same ballot.
Meghan Reckling: Most Voters Don’t Follow Politics (1:44)
14 Dec 2024
https://rumble.com/v5z9q5z-meghan-reckling-most-voters-dont-follow-politicsmessaging-and-resources-are.html
Trump won by less that 2% of the popular vote against a well documented as Marxist/Maoist pair of idiots who supported the castration of children, abortion up to birth, release of criminals without bail, open borders, sanctuary cities, etc., etc. Even a few million of those votes being fraudulent wouldn’t have changed that percentage significantly.
You live in an easily propagandized, attention deficit, political idiocracy. Most people aren’t even remotely paying enough attention to important details or even know what to pay attention to. Most, as always, primarily vote their wallets which is why I hope there isn’t an economic downturn prior to the midterms.
This has NOTHING to do with what the public thinks. Getting a Congressional subpoena matters INSIDE the Beltway. Subpoenaing a judge? Possibly unheard of. I’m not aware of it happening often.
Sometimes you do things to remind people who is in charge.
And finally, the goal here is legislation cutting the size, scope, and jurisdiction of the inferior courts.
The part of the public that does pay attention will know why it’s important. Those that don’t won’t lift a finger to stop it.
Question,
Can Supreme Court Justices be subpoenaed by the DOJ or Congress?
Can Kash at the FBI if an investigation is formally opened, can they question a Supreme Court Justices?
If so it might be interesting to get not only Roberts take on things but maybe Clarence Thomas might have some interesting insight if asked under oath or by Kash/Pam
Dear Chief Justice Roberts:
The House of Representatives is considering judicial reform, including reforming the FISA Court. We would request your attendance at both closed and open hearings to hear your views on this matter, and to address some of the members’ concerns.
Thank you for your anticipated coopetation.
Very truly yours,
Michael Johnson
Speaker of the House
Yep. Subtle as a heart attack in DC terms. A letter like that would be a political earthquake.
Roberts has to tread carefully. SCOTUS assumed its role all those centuries ago. But nothing lasts forever, and their absolute power has led to a corrupt judicial system in this country.
Trump’s best response to CJ Roberts yesterday, “How many votes did you and your good friend James Biasberg receive from the American People in your reelection campaigns?”
For DOJ to do it, they’d need a grand jury AND a judge willing to allow it. HARD.
For Congress? Easy. They just need to tie it to pending legislation intended to reform the inferior courts.
An opinion from Ace of Spades commentator I fully agree with and would like to share here:
My response to the judicial insurrection.
1. Accept we’re in a civil war, that this is a tactic of war. Accept that no satisfactory relief will be achieved through the judicial branch, that the Roberts/Barrett court will let rulings stand or offer partial relief that only further insults and attenuates executive authority.
2. Resolve to defy the courts on select cases. Gather your entire legal team to define which cases. Augment the team with as many outside legal scholars as possible (e.g., Turley and Dershowitz).
3. Resolve that this will be a public information campaign as much as a legal challenge; Develop talking points and aggressive, proactive PR strategy.
3. Presidential address. Call it not a Constitutional crisis but a Constitutional correction. Itemize the judicial transgressions on executive branch over the years. Call it a matter not only of Constitutional integrity but national security. Explain you are acting in name of Constitution, conscience and national imperative.
4. Explain to legislative branch that if they find these corrections outside scope of executive authority, they have right and duty to make their case for impeachment. Directly challenge them.
This is the best solution I’ve seen so far.
Let’s roll !
We are at war, we are under attack and yet because there are not tanks rolling down our streets, people don’t seem to get this.
A large part of our problem is not seeing things for what they really are.
Sundance often talks about how we need to be the truth teller and to stop the pretending.
I often wonder of people understand how critical this need is.. we can’t fight off attacks if we don’t even understand what modern warfare is or looks like.
Absolutely bring the Constitution (and the “enumerated” powers) into the public conversation. It has to be there. Left to “opinions”, We lose.
This over-reach of manipulation goes back 40 years or more, this is not a recent occurrence. And it will not be excised without a lot of ugly circumstances.
I think it may be too late to save the country.
That is very possible. And when the people who just wanted to be left alone on their walk through life get involved, it will certainly be too late.
Me too.
I read Hokadda’s post yesterday & am glad you highlighted it. As I suffer from battered Conservative Syndrome, I’m not holding my breath that Congress will follow this advice (or do anything meaningful for that matter), but hope they will.
Right…..? The only kind of redress to what I’m perceiving……is REALLY going on…..Makes ME think I’m a far right anarchist……( like my soy fed low T neighbors likely do…..)
A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex.
Unfortunately, this would require Congressional Republicans to ask the right questions; including follow up after Boasberg responds with his prepared gibberish.
Democrats on the committee will turn it onto a media circus.
Speaker Johnson would have to form a committee the way Pelosi formed the j6 committee where he gets to pick Republicans and the 2 Democrats.
LMAO, “No Johnson” Johnson is a eunuch. He couldn’t get this done if he wanted to.
And even if he tried, Jeffries wouldn’t roll over and wet himself when Johnson says he gets to select the Democrats.
President Trump has thrown down the gauntlet. It is time to educate and inflame the public through conservative media about the courts criminal abuse of power. Get us good and pis…ed off and writing our elected representatives. While in the meantime Bondi and Patel are developing criminal cases. All cabinet members must thoroughly familiar with the facts and law so they can interject them in every encounter with the media.
God bless President Trump and God bless America.
If the Senate could have a select committee in 1975 to investigate abuses by the CIA (the Church Committee, chaired by Senator Frank Church), then Thune or Johnson could set up a select committee to investigate abuses by the FISA court.
That the investigation may involved confidential information was not an issue in 1975 with the CIA, so there’s no reason why FISA should be off limits to Congress now.
Congress created the FISA court, just like it created the CIA, and has the authority to see where the taxpayers’ money went.
Sounds like Sundance should submit this information to Kash Patel and Dan Bongino over at the FBI for them to investigate.
The “Dynamic Duo”? No, Warroom would be better.
i would imagine we will be seeing this info put forth by the administration very soon.
Thank you Sundance!! Supurb information!!
If Hokkoda’s approach is the way to go then attention needs to be paid NOW to the 2026 House elections. Not only does the majority have to hold but it needs to be increased, and those additional seats need to be as MAGA as they can be. The President will need a strong majority. (And maybe a better House Speaker.)
And watch state supreme court elections, such as the one in Wisconsin next month. A fake discrimination case can lead to re-apportioning congressional districts.
Before he started funding left-wing DAs, Soros was involved in state supreme court and secretary of state elections. He saw how important these offices were in the 2000 Florida recount.
Agree 100%. Republicans are not paying enough attention. And since your brought up Soros, who is supposed to be behind the group terrorizing Tesla owners and dealerships, how much longer do we have to wait for an all-out op to find these folks and to get the Soros connection(s) broken?
Action is needed now because these same corrupt judges will protect election fraud in 2026. Deal with them now so we can have free and fair elections later.
Agree. I think we can do both, now, and the 2026 elections.
We need to remove chess pieces from the board. Currently, the judges “control the center” to use a chess term. We have to break that up if we’re to advance pieces into positions from which we can attack. States like WI and MN will block attempts to ensure election integrity through the Federal courts. We have to remove those obstacles smartly to allow investigations to proceed unencumbered. Just like in 2020, the courts will run interference to block sunlight on crooked elections officials, mail in voting, and the various voting machine companies.
Treason.
This kind of activity is not called “lawfare” for no reason.
If President Trump does not take action to stop the lawfare, then he has no one to blame but himself.
If he needs to remove appointees who are dithering, or doing little or nothing to move his (the people’s) agenda, then he has no one to blame but himself.
Sounds like the Federalist Papers called this one out nearly 250 years ago.
The inherent beauty and incredible fallacy of our constitutional republic is the checks and balances system. In order to perform the checks and balances, it has to be done by those already in power against those already in power.
If private citizens are subject to audit for something as simple as taxes, the heights of power absolutely also have to be subject to the same audits.
The judicial branch certainly is far overdue to receive their sunlight.
The question is: how often, and under what system do we institute these checks and balances, in a way which eliminates political motivation (see: retention of power)? And how do we institute it moving forward to ensure that, when the balance of current power structure sways to either the left or right, that the same system can also work in the same way, while ensuring that justice and constitutional forethought prevail, rather than the whims of the time or the Overton Window?
I don’t have a ready answer to that.
+Judge James E Boasberg seems to be extending legal constitutional protections to members of the ‘Tren de Aragua’ gang from South American. [non-citizens/illegal immigrants.] The Judge wants the deported gang-members back in the USA. & Donald Trump wants to keep them out. [Should deported illegal aliens begiven the same Constitutional Protections as Americans, or anyone else lawfully >inside America?]
There seems to be political aspects to >many if not all, of the Judge’s decisions.
…… ALL the people encouraging the illegal invasion of the USA, should be required to pay for all the harm, that is caused by illegal aliens. = [A belief shared by most Americans, but NOT even considered by the people encouraging illegal immigration.]
TheConservativeTreehouse, = “100,000+ Americans are killed each year with the intentional and purposeful transportation of Chinese drugs through the U.S. southern border of Mexico and the U.S northern border with Canada. Both nations could, if they wanted, crack down on the illegal and dangerous drug trade; neither has prioritized the problem. Again, 100,000+ Americans are killed each year.” [March 9, 2025, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick -vs- NBC Kirsten Welker]
President Donald J Trump is trying to protect the people in the United States from the ‘conspirators’ trying to destroy America as we know it.
Judge James E Boasberg seems to be working overtime to stop Donald Trump from protecting Americans. … As they might say down in the Sunshine State, “Judge Boasberg seems to be busier than a one-legged man in a Butt Kicking Contest,” working overtime, to help >prevent President Donald J Trump from Making America Great Again.
Does President Trump know this valuable background info?
One would think it can be leveraged in the right situation.
Is any other “conservative” media picking up on this?
Why don’t they want the most violent of the violent foreigners that “Joe Biden” brought in, sometimes even on flights, deported? Are they planning on using them against the citizens as their muscle at some point if they feel they are about to all go to jail? Things may be way more dangerous than we realize.
I have been waiting, since the millions of illegals have been pouring in with their free cell phones, for them to get the message and start wreaking havoc on the citizens.
Sunlight on this judge intervention where he obviously lacks authority.
This judge should be called to testify before Congress.
Charges of treason seem in order.
Sundance Sir:
We need a deep study here to learn about what went on in El Salvador in their own Judiciary to have caused that country to fall into becoming a failed Narco state.
Nayib Bukele has turned this around and has seen incredible success. He’s been Tweeting about this, about the need to remove these Judges, but I feel like it’s falling on deaf ears.
I’ve been following it.. I believe that what went on there is just what is going on here: Corrupt Judges have formed a cabal that is driving the nation downward.
Bukele’s government removed these Judges en masse and then set out to fix his country, and he’s seeing amazing success having made this bold move.
This entire situation in El Salvador needs exposure and a study so we can connect the dots and learn.. I absolutely believe we’re dealing with the same situation here and it’s likely all connected.
I recall that Jeff Sessions himself went to El Salvador twice.
There is a big situation here that we’re not grasping.. not even looking at.
I did find this article that explains some of what I’m talking about, but we need accurate in depth analysis that show us the history and what they’ve done today in correction.
El Salvador legislative assembly removes supreme court judges
https://www.conectas.org/en/noticias/el-salvador-legislative-assembly-removes-supreme-court-judges/
Create some ‘Mockingbirds’, use MAGA media types to associate Boasberg’s TROs etc.. with every murder and rape alleged committed by an illegal.
goose and gander. if these courts can call out the executive then the executive can call out these courts. write an EO stating that until congress reels them in then the executive will ignore them at their discretion all actions that encroach on the executive.
It’s time to make public the filth hiding in their closets…
Start with Roberts and Epstein relationship and cooperation…
See the worms squirm…INSIST on retirement/resignations….
Prosecute the lawbreakers….
NO MERCY!
So, if the hearings process implicates Roberts as a conspirator in the set-up of the impeachment hoax, would he claim immunity from being compelled to testify before Congress based upon separation of powers? How can he be held to account?
Perfect… explains why Bosberg was right there on a Saturday to issue a TRO without allowing time for a government response…
Lawfare jumped the shark… time now to expose everything and take down their beloved, corrupt court institution.
F these Crap Weasels.
Time for the DOJ to make rumblings about going back and reviewing the FISA warrants and Boasberg’s role in the surveillance of candidate and President Trump.
I’m thinking, based on the type of information he is searching for as well as the order itself that a few “sensitive” people were on those flights. He sure wants a lot, including turning the aircraft around…
The Devil, as they say, are in the details….
The SCOTUS decided that in the 18 hundreds. Judges cannot overrule a President. The constitution also says nothing about judges being able to overrule a President.
This seems apropos…
“You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.
Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privileges of their corps…
Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.”
~Thomas Jefferson~
They warned us didn’t they? Good morning Betsy!
Good morning, dear Monti…
Oh yes, they did.
So many references to the power, or the lack thereof, of the judiciary. Strange how name your judge at any level including the SC there are who are ignorant of Constitutional history or choose ignore it.