The DC federal appeals court has reversed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued Saturday. The appeals court is confirming [pdf Decision Here] that President Donald Trump has the executive power to fire Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger.
Dellinger was fighting President Trump’s effort to reform the bureaucracy in DC and fire officials within the executive branch. Activist District Judge Berman Jackson (pictured above) was supporting Hampton Dellinger, saying President Trump could not fire him. The appeals court has lifted the lower court’s injunction that barred Trump from removing Hampton Dellinger.
This is a win for commonsense and also a big win for President Trump and the plenary power of the Executive. The President alone controls the executive office holders, and the courts have no constitutional authority to interfere in the executive branch determinations of staffing. The plenary and constitutional power of the presidency has been affirmed.
WASHINGTON – […] The two-page ruling Wednesday from three judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals contained no detailed explanation. But it said lawyers for the Trump administration had met the legal standard to lift an injunction that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued on Saturday.
[…] The ruling flips the momentum in the president’s favor ahead of an imminent Supreme Court battle over Trump’s power to unilaterally fire executive branch officials who are protected by laws meant to preserve their independence.
Last month, the high court declined to rule immediately on a request by the Trump administration to allow Dellinger to be replaced, effectively giving Dellinger a reprieve. But the high court is expected to weigh in more substantively soon on the issue — whether in Dellinger’s case or in another case.
The administration is also appealing a judge’s decision to reinstate another Biden appointee Trump sought to fire: Cathy Harris, chair of the Merit Systems Protection Board, which handles employee grievances. Harris, like Dellinger, has been a key player in the brewing legal battle over the Trump administration’s mass firings of thousands of probationary government employees. (read more)
[SOURCE]
Great news! May I offer a correction of a typo?
“The President along” was intended to read “The President alone”?
No, you may not.
Yes, you may. This is a valuable site, but it is often rife with poor grammar and punctuation and typos.
Spell check often leads to word use error, a word spelled correctly in the wrong context will sometimes be over looked when proof reading. I think many, if not all of us has done this at some point in time. I, eye, aye.
Aye Aye, Captain
Eye sea.
It is not spell check, it is auto-complete that is the problem. Both alone and along would have passed spell check.
Auto-complete sucks. I’ve seen it alter words and sentences all too often and it’s not noticed until after the trigger is pulled.
It’s one thing to proofread yourself; it’s ridiculous to have to proofread the phone/app editor.
Sometimes the results are hilarious though. 🙂
Thank you, JoAnn Leichliter.
I upvoted your “Yes, you may.”
I’m all for good grammar, and punctuation, and I don’t like typos.
That said, ideas are more important.
I am not for the grammar police.
To err is human. Luckily we were given the ability to understand without perfection. Sundance does a lot of long, hard work.
It’s more about historical archiving… we all want sundance to look good for the records!
(it’s not about us being nit-picky and critical)
Thank you, Slowcobra.
To air is humane… 😉
To really screw up takes a computer.
Typos, spelling, and grammar errors make me nuts, so “Yes, you may”.
Does anybody bother to read Sundance’s rules anymore?
Thank you, Sundance!
Not gonna lie…I’m surprised the DC Appellate Court sided with the President…especially this President! An extra dose of Winnamins to close out Wednesday! 💥🇺🇸💥🇺🇸💥🇺🇸💥
LOVE the pic…no, not the one of the yenta…the one on the bottom…
The 3 judges are 1 Bush and 1 Trump appointed judge and 1 Nobummer judge
Great news for President Trump, and more importantly your nation.
Congratulations from British Columbia.
Cheers!
Sir, can you explain your great nation? When did it take a Liberal tilt?
I visited pristine Vancouver around 1998, and now online clips make sections look like San Francisco.
When did your country go soft on hard drugs? Seems like it’s a political plague that has hit the whole west coast. Are the drug cartels active in your area?
Cheers. P.S. Poilievre sounds like a much better option.
Yes the drug cartels are a significant player in the local drug trade.
We have having been sliding further into the abyss for approximately 30 years.
Approximately 15 years ago Vancouver city council went hard left..your guy Tom Steyer ( billionaire Californian.) tides foundation I believe, funded radical ideologues. The same as S.F.
The rest is history.
Vancouver is a sh*thole..ultra wealthy in spots.
Thousands of offshore money has been pumped into real estate.
Massive ponzi schemes has developed.
IMO it is a worldwide attack on civilization.
Dramatic? Maybe.
Soros/Tides Foundation; one in the same
Yes, but does Tom Steyer not have some connection to Tides?
Cheers!
🎯
No, you are dead on, so to speak.
This is a war on all civilization and all peoples by the Global Derp State.
Existentialism at its darkest.
And driven from the source of all evil. The human purveyors are just the puppets of the evil one.
And ultimately, the father of lies, as is obvious by how much our enemies push false narratives, and advocate for depravity and debauchery.
Cheers! NOT “Dramatic” or paranoid, either.
Just as the MSM all reading off the exact sams script is a give-away, the reality of Globullust takeover of not just Govt.s, Lpolitical parties, but religions and all institutions in all Western Countries, is a clear sign its ALL CO-ORDINATED.
Its like how the Uniparty is NOT just in the U.S., as Brexit clearly exposed, and the Covid scam as well.
Huzzah. Even the courts can’t twist the pretzel to support the lawfare attacks on the administration.
And there’s this positive to maybe straighten out the AG.
“The Senate on March 5 confirmed Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s former criminal defense attorney, to serve as deputy attorney general, second-in-command of the Justice Department.” Epoch Times
Yeah baby!
And here’s a huge negative action by the SCOTUS:
“The Supreme Court directed the federal district court that ordered the federal government to resume payments to “clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines.”
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.
U.S. District Judge Amir Ali issued a temporary restraining order last month compelling both the U.S. Agency for International Development and the State Department to restore funding for contracts that predated Jan. 20 but were frozen by the Trump administration.”
Worse?
“The AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, the lead respondent, said in a brief filed with the Supreme Court that recipients of foreign-assistance funding and stakeholder associations challenged the federal government’s “foreign-assistance freeze as an unconstitutional exercise of presidential power in contravention of congressional will and as an arbitrary and capricious agency action.”
Quotes from Epoch Times
Not good my friends when a district court judge is backed by the SCOTUS to keep funding USAID even when the corruption has already been exposed!
Honoring contracts. Yes, the US must honor contracts already signed, that Congress has already authorized….
That is why the budget is so important. No more continuing resolutions. That is really sucking money from taxpayers who don’t have any influence on government for expenditures that Congress probably didn’t even realize that they were passing because it’s all in this huge continuing budget.
Read the dissent
Here’s the problem which is being entirely
overlooked :
Congress is doing blanket appropriations for the agencies and leaving much if not all of the funds to be distributed by the agency bureaucrats as they see fit, without further oversight. That’s how we’re getting these ridiculous, appalling disbursements we’ve all just heard about.
The courts are behaving as if each individual assignment of funding is specifically authorized by Congress, when that isn’t the case at all ! That’s why all of these Congressmen are just as shocked to see these things as everyone else.
This is why the courts Should be upholding the spending freezes – but no one in Congress or media is standing up and stating this simple, obvious truth.
The problem is the solution. The order is to spend the money. Redirect it. Spend it on similar sounding themes that help rather than hurt the US.
Likely impossible, especially given the short time frames ordered to release the money.
Of course, as Sundance pointed out, it will now be challenged on the merits in the lower court. So round n round we go.
In general the Anti-deficiency Act (31USC1341) prohibits that kind of creative accounting.
No, Congress does NOT do “blanket appropriations”. It currently has enacted a “Continuing Appropriations” which allows funding for the specific programs/budgets approved in the FY2024 appropriation acts. See Public Law 118-83 “Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act , 2025” Division A Sec 101 which provides the specific FY2024 Appropriation Acts that are extended into FY2025.
Of course, prior year appropriations do not always expire at the end of the fiscal year they were authorized.
Honoring contracts. All contracts I was involved with included clauses like FAR 52.149-2:
“Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-Price) (Apr 2012)
(a) The Government may terminate performance of work under this contract in whole or, from time to time, in part if the Contracting Officer determines that a termination is in the Government’s interest. The Contracting Officer shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the extent of termination and the effective date.”
As far as the claims are for services already rendered, that is a matter of contact law. As far as future services go, it appears, that Trump has cancelled all contracts going forward.
However disappointing the SCOTUS order was today, I think this excerpt from a HotAir post gives the best a brief analysis of where the case is procedurally:
“Roberts’ order will force [Judge] Ali to step through each of the spending demands, determine standing for each party, and set a rational schedule. The latter will leave enough time for the Trump administration to appeal and get hearings on the merits. And if [Judge] Ali balks at approaching this rationally, we know for certain that the Trump administration has four votes to grant cert right now, and that Roberts will be none to happy to have to intervene again in the same case. “
The plaintiffs and the district court judge were hoping that Trump would have to pay up…period.
But SCOTUS sent it back to allow Trump to go through each plaintiff’s claims, raise standing, and question what is owed for what, whether it is a charge for services actually in the contract, whether the charges are reasonable… and I hope they ask for receipts.
Yes, it is annoying that DOJ lawyers are working on this instead of more important matters, and I agree with Alito’s dissent, but the district court judge and the plaintiffs are going to have to do a lot of work. And we know how work-shy libs are.
The cases filed against the DOGE efforts are going to be tangles of procedure on temporary restraining orders, injunctions, stays, appealability, etc. Don’t let a temporary setback discourage you. Nothing is final until a SCOTUS opinion on the merits.
From the dissent:
The District Court, however, failed to mention (much less reckon with) Bowen or Knudson before plowing ahead with its $2 billion order. Nor did it take account of our previous suggestion that the proper remedy for an agency’s recalcitrant failure to pay out may be to “seek specific sums already calculated” and “past due” in the Court of Federal Claims. Maine Community Health Options v. United States, 590 U. S. 296, 327 (2020); Bowen, 487 U. S., at 890, n. 13 (invoking the First Circuit’s suggestion that if an agency “‘persist[s] in withholding reimbursement for reasons inconsistent with our decision’” under the APA, the “‘remedy would be a suit for money past due under the Tucker Act in the Claims Court’”).
(bold face added)
How nice of Alito to give the DOJ a hint of the legal basis for a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12 when the case goes back down.
“… we know how work-shy libs are….”
we know also there are a lot of DEI hires that aren’t terribly good at their jobs; sloppy, as well.
Even though it delays the outcome I feel optimistic… especially if receipts are required which seems automatic.
“foreign-assistance freeze as an unconstitutional exercise of presidential power in contravention of congressional will and as an arbitrary and capricious agency action.”
It is Congress who violated the Constitution by giving money to foreign interests. Nothing in the Constitution allows Congress to provide foreign aid. Not even humanitarian aid.
President Trump is upholding his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution by halting unconstitutional spending by Congress.
May I ask where Justice Barrett is in all this..? (Or is she still in her “Why can’t we all get along” mode?)
That judge could spend the next decade or two going through all of the foreign aid obligations that are imagined to be covered, as well as explaining the feasibility of such payments with appeals to the appeals of every one of them with lots of “if you think that is so, what about…?” I think the court said, “You made a bed, now lie in it until you see the error of your ways.”
Should of been AG
The US Constitution is not unconstitutional…. 3 cheers for Common Sense…
This a victory in step one, removing the TRO and Dillenger is now considered “removed” from office … however … the litigation by Dillenger still has to be resolved as well before the DC Circuit.
Hope common sense prevails in that hearing as well, though I have my doubts as this is the DC Circuit.
Concern being that if this case goes to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts added in the opinion for the Plenary Powers Case that this specific case “may be an example of an exception to the President’s Plenary Powers and Authority over the Executive Branch”
If the USSC forces Trump to keep him, there are many ways to “freeze”, “isolate” and make life “rough” for him etc. Many times, in my career in private industry, I experienced how management neutralizes “undesirables” making them fade into the woodwork so to say.
Aka relocate the office to Fairbanks in a shitty office and 20 year old laptop running Windows 98.
“Ok, I have to keep you, but I decide where you’ll work each day.”
Deny access to classified information and other DOJ on line communications and activities.
There would be constant court hearings about every accomodation he receives or does not receive.
SCOTUS has already ruled that the Pres IS the Executive Branch. Shouldn’t be any questions, but that’s lawfare for you.
Why can’t they fast-track this stuff, and rule on several simultaneously as they all try to challenge the plenary power of the Presidency.
Is that John Dil. JR
The 64K question is hampton dellinger going to appeal? He is probably getting pro bono legal assistance from the eisen/weissman team of cowardly lawyers who only know how to find Trump hating judges around dc, ny, etc.
Yes his handlers will have Dillinger “appeal” if for no other reason to test if Chief Justice Roberts was serious about his comment in the Plenary Powers case … as I state above … this specific case “may be an example of an exception to the President plenary Powers. and Authority over the Executive Branch”
Wonder if there is any “precedent” where a president fired someone who held this position before.
How can Plenary Powers exist if there are exceptions?
Speaking of the devils……. Why haven’t we heard, or why hasn’t it been done yet, the revocation of horseface Mary McCord’s security clearance ???
Berman Jackson is a monumental disgrace and an abomination of a Judge .
She’s also most likely an asset of a three letter agency.
Is this a rope a dope play by the donkeys? Theyre completely adrift and losing everytime they take on PDJT. Are they really THAT stupid?
Got to sort that mess the SCOTUS issued today on that 2B USAID contracting mess.
The monies from USAID supposedly already for work completed.
Do they have any other choice?
Thank you for the straight news Sundance, particularly on these Lawfare rulings.
It’s difficult to keep up with them when the media tries so hard to spin everything, and they try extra hard with Lawfare rulings.
Woke judge slapped down. Very satisfying, especially that one.
Deep state has flipped the culture switch back to “normal” and has given up on cultural programming via media, education, and entertainment.
My guess is they’re now going with AI for programming and control. Think of that AI as dad in your pocket and he knows all, and I mean ALL. He’ll advise you ever step of the way. Misbehave or mis-think and he’ll (literally) take away the keys to your car.
And if you leave your phone at home, no worries. Your friends phone (or car, or tv, or laptop) will tell dad what you’ve been up to and what your friends dads think about you.
If, in spite of all the advice dad provides, you still misbehave, dad will notify the authorities and they’ll pick you up for treatment or turn off your money or maybe lock the fridge. And if friends try to help, they’ll get treated to.
Gonna be fun times for anyone with a brain. Fortunately, since dad will do all your thinking, you wont really need thinking skills anymore. Not sure what your value will be at that point though.
Scary stuff.
Like an over arching parent that never lets go and controls the choices and decision of the child. The child never able to find his center and explore and experiment with the environment in conjunction with the internal self, thus stifling growth and maturity. The result is a truncated person – frustrated and stunted. Is this our future? It is an evil in this regard – eliminating free will essentially.
Winnamins!
The Executive Branch is not without power. A key Team Trump strategy needs to be compelling judges to give sworn Grand Jury testimony. And I’d use Federal election interference laws as the core of the case.
Then you target specific judges:
– Chutkan
– Boasberg
– Sullivan
– Contreras
– Merchan (NY)
And you use Lawfare style strategies such as “National Security” and bringing cases to friendly judges.
We have all the DOJ and FBI data now. How much was Boasberg colluding with Clinesmith and Strzok to wire tap Trump? What were the Lawfare connections to Chutkan and the J6 hoax? How much money did Merchan’s Democrat fundraiser daughter gain due to his sham trial? How much was he colluding with James and Bragg?
Judges are a problem. Judges are not above the law. Target them and use Lawfare against them.
And don’t be surprised if ACB ruled against Trump on the $2B because: Catholic Charities.
Not surprised in the least
When am I going to be impressed by women in positions of authority?
I’ll wait with you, i.e., if you don’t mind.
Never.
Don’t hold your breath.
Sadly never
All leftist women are narcissistic lunatics and their pathological self righteousness and inner rage allows them to do anything they want, legal or not. That’s been my experience and I’m a woman.
I love women and have married twice yet so many are the embodiment of Lewis Carroll’s Queen of Hearts. . Further the same charactoristsic that make good mothers IMO make bad leaders outside of family. I’m specifically thinking ACB.
Agreed.
Leftist women, yes! But not all women.
Like someone said, it all started with Eve.
It started with Adam because he didn’t want to give up his Eve. Reread scripture he was there the whole time and he got the rule firsthand where Eve got it via Adam.
Margaret Thatcher and Hatshepsut first female king of Egypt.
Don’t confuse leftist women with all women! Margaret Thatcher was awesome! Currently I am very impressed with Harriet Hageman. Tulsi Gabbard is doing a good job as well as Kristi Noem.
Strategy #2: a short and sweet bill from Congress stating the following:
“All laws limiting the power of the President to directly fire Executive branch employees are hereby repealed.”
Keep it simple.
Ready on the right, ready on the left, all ready on the firing line; the gossip tabloid, London Daily Mail Online is reporting, “Trump to tear down America’s education system…,” doing it with an EO; not reported is that he will give education back to the states which is where it should be, the DOE should never have existed much like the Ukraine war. The DOE has been overtaken with radicals/Alinskyites from the get-go, and it should be recognized as the cause of the decline in American education.
“Trump to tear down” LOL
What, I wonder, does the Mail believe is left to tear down? The system is already crumbled to the foundation. Trump is simply going to demo the ruins and then redevelop (that’s what he does), unleashing a new era of pro-America education.
The ‘Education’ system has produced the worst results in the developed world… we’re last in every category.
Case in point: the idiots here screeching about “Trump’s tearing it down” are a product of it; and too dumbed down to understand that.
It was bad before, but how long has it been infected with the rot of woke-ism/marxism? We have college professors teaching it – so 40-50+? years
Tearing it down won’t make things worse for US because dead last is as bad as it gets.
{ http://deliberatedumbingdown.com/ddd/ }
The Brightest remnant will be our Saving Grace – those who could not be dumbed down in spite of the efforts.
Alinsky’s influence
{
}
Before he came along, the turn of the century plutocrats -the Rockefellers et al – didn’t want ‘thinkers’ they wanted compliant workers, so the dumbing down began there.
If the Daily Mail didn’t use leftist hyperbole, it wouldn’t be the media rag it is.
Hunt down, investigate and indict every lawfare attorney in this nation…prosecute and imprison them as a threat to this nation.
Chief Justice Roberts breaths a (possibly temporary) sigh of relief . . .
Have no fear. Judges such as Berman can’t help but create chaos and make decisions far outside normal jurisprudence. She’ll be back again.
Maybe she can do so from the Hindu Kush…
It’s what they do.
In case people are confused, the Supreme Court, the nine justices, are the only ‘co-equal’ entities in the Judicial Branch. All the other federal judiciary courts are not ‘co-equal’ and have no business sitting in judgement of some Executive actions. They have no standing at all.
The proper decision from the DC Appellate Court should have been to rule that the inferior courts have no jurisdiction and vacate the other courts ruling.
Trump will have to tough it out so the Supreme Court can lay down the constitutional law to the lower courts. Hence the Supreme Court ruling on Presidential Immunity and other recent rulings that are beating back the out-of-control inferior courts.
BTW, the Supreme Court has zero operational control over the lower courts. The only way for the Supreme Court to exert influence on the lower courts is to overrule their decisions.
Congress controls the inferior courts and they can legislate better side boards for those courts to follow.
Trump will have to tough it out so the Supreme Court can lay down the constitutional law to the lower courts.
But will it? How deep is deep state’s control over Chief Justice?
I think you will find the Judiciary Act of 1789 created district courts and made them the courts of original jurisdiction for “cognizance of all crimes and offenses that are cognizable under the Authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts”
Buh-BYE, Hampton !!
Great news! But now I’m too pumped to sleep.
Edited…
The Constitution only established the Supreme Court not any of the lower courts. Congress created the federal district and appeals courts so they technically have no authority over the President.
In fact, since the judges in the district and appeals courts were not established by the Constitution there should be no reason any judge cannot be removed by a simple majority vote. No impeachment process is required!
“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.”
Not sure what part of “inferior courts” you don’t understand.
Interesting
Perhaps it’s happening already, but the more recalcitrant government depts might be throttled/neutered into submission, by utilizing proven leftist bureaucratic techniques:
(1) Hire only pro-Trump people & overstock all departmental governing committees.
(2) Cancel existing personnel travel agreements & require new agreements & credit lines to be issued. Or change banks.
(3) Expand the paperwork/audit trail for any new payments.
(4) Institute a new (more lengthy) approval process.
(5) Require all existing employees to attend new policy courses.
(6) Underscore that failure to follow such new rules can trigger suspension or termination.
Basically that’s what Obama did.
These judges themselves need to face impeachment.
How would the judicial branch like it if President Trump started declaring what Judges could preside over a case?
How would they like for him to decide who’s even qualified to wear a robe?
They would scream and how that he doesn’t have the authority to decide any of that and yet these unelected derelicts in robes are doing exactly that to the Executive Branch.
“…who are protected by laws meant to preserve their independence.”
Such laws violate Article II, Section I of the Constitution, and therefore are invalid. This started with the assassination of James Garfield, in 1881. Anyone who voted for them should be removed for violating their oath of office. I know, I know. Such a standard would empty the government. Let’s do it, and start over.
Ready, aim, fire in the hole. Your fired.😡
This case would have been heading up to SCOTUS too. However, Dellinger has had more than enough time to shred whatever documents he still had access to, thanks to Judge Jackson. Just a thought.
Nice that a court ruled such as the supreme court not so long ago. Shame yesterday they ignored their own ruling . Seems Barrett and Roberts have short memories.
Now would be a good time for the OMB to direct all fifty states to submit audits of federal remittance. Let the thieves ring there hands and squeal some more. This is a Republic after all and we are all accountable.
I’m so happy to see that the Dishonorable Amy VERMIN Jackson got her bowl flushed on appeal.
It could not have happened to a more deserving Leftist other than the now formally fired Hampton Suites.
Check that, Hamptoon Dellinger.
F these Actvivist Judges… need to sweep them out!!
How much damage did that Crap Weassl do when he was illegally “reinstated”.
I wonder if the DC federal appeals court reversed the D.C. District Court because they realize this continued Lawfare is putting the inferior court right into the target for Congress to restructure and restrain the system?
Trump needs to sic the Solicitor General on these partisan scumbags and get them impeached.
Do you think for one second that assuming all Republican Senators would vote to remove an impeached Federal judge (an improbable assumption), that they could get 14 Democrat Senators to vote to remove a Democrat appointed Federal judge? Not going to happen!
PDJT held the upper hand all along – even if the judicial power grab were to succeed. Anyone familiar with civil service knows there are many ways to induce someone to resign.
I love executive power. Don’t you? 😊
when its in the hands of President Trump
There’s this: https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/no-the-supreme-court-did-not-allow?
Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s rationale for her decision about Hampton Dellinger was that Congress did not want the position to be “partisan,” which clues us in that anyone Trump would pick for the job would automatically be considered “partisan,” as opposed to anyone a Democrat appointed.
If “partisan” makes a nominee unacceptable in that position, what in the world is Hampton Dellinger doing occupying that office? Dellinger is a long-time, completely professional PARTISAN DEMOCRAT. By Berman Jackson’s own logic, Hampton Dellinger is completely UNDESIRABLE in that office.
“laws meant to preserve their independence”
This needs to be addressed… for good. THREE BRANCHES, PEOPLE!!! Not four, not five, not eleven… THREE.
[…] The ruling flips the momentum in the president’s favor ahead of an imminent Supreme Court battle over Trump’s power to unilaterally fire executive branch officials who are protected by laws meant to preserve their independence.
IMO, if these officials acted and presented themselves in a truly independent manner in all circumstances (privately, politically and while executing their job duties), then perhaps a new administration would not feel compelled to fire them.
Guarantying employment – not being accountable to anyone – does not insure independence, it opens the door to corruption.
Just shows how important it is for President Trump to get the “right” judges onto the Federal district and appellate courts. He was given bad advice when he nominated Barrett to the Supreme Court. She is turning out to be another RINO “David Souter” on the bench, along with “RINO” John Roberts, both of whom were nominated by the Bush boys.
If judges can play lawfare and plug up a sitting president’s management with frivolous lawsuits to slow down momentum, after winning the lawsuit, the president should be able to sue the judge for a frivolous lawsuit and obstructing the executive branch. The judges should be suspended, removed, disbarred, etc. Judges should be disciplined for this aggreges action. They must be held accountable.
I don’t like any babe with 3 names…
Did everyone forget SCOTUS decision in Trump v. U.S. last summer…
POTUS is immune to the Courts…
Monarchy !!! cried the D/Hamas party…
As their usurper in chief flagrantly disregarded every Constitutional constraint delegated to the Executive by the consent of the governed, and aided and abetted Our enemies, foreign and (D)omestic…
One more time…
They {D/Hamas} shot you in the head Mr. President.
No quarter.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
Now that he’s fired from the White House Hampton Dellinger will go back to being the villain in trashy romance novels.