The Eagle has landed.
Harden up!
.
President Donald Trump has fired multiple damaging XO’s directly into the heart of the beast. Now the waves of administration officials begin the arduous task of engaging each of the institutional silos to remove the entrenched corruptocrats.
WHITE HOUSE – “Section 1. Purpose. Article II of the United States Constitution vests the President with the sole and exclusive authority over the executive branch, including the authority to manage the Federal workforce to ensure effective execution of Federal law. A critical aspect of this executive function is the responsibility to maintain professionalism and accountability within the civil service. This accountability is sorely lacking today. Only 41 percent of civil service supervisors are confident that they can remove an employee who engaged in insubordination or serious misconduct. Even fewer supervisors –- 26 percent — are confident that they can remove an employee for poor performance.”
“Accountability is essential for all Federal employees, but it is especially important for those who are in policy-influencing positions. These personnel are entrusted to shape and implement actions that have a significant impact on all Americans. Any power they have is delegated by the President, and they must be accountable to the President, who is the only member of the executive branch, other than the Vice President, elected and directly accountable to the American people. In recent years, however, there have been numerous and well-documented cases of career Federal employees resisting and undermining the policies and directives of their executive leadership. Principles of good administration, therefore, necessitate action to restore accountability to the career civil service, beginning with positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.
Sec. 2. Reinstatement of Prior Administration Policy. Executive Order 13957 of October 21, 2020 (Creating Schedule F in the Excepted Service), is hereby immediately reinstated with full force and effect, subject to the amendments described in section 3 of this order; provided that the date of this order shall be treated as the date of Executive Order 13957.
Sec. 3. Amendments to Prior Administration Policy. Executive Order 13957 is amended as follows:
(a) replace the letter “F” throughout, when used to designate an excepted service schedule, with the words “Policy/Career”;
(b) in section 1:
(i) remove the text between the words “make necessary” in the seventh paragraph and “excepting such positions” in the eighth paragraph; and
(ii) insert the text “competitive service and the” immediately before the words “adverse action procedures” in the eighth paragraph;
(c) in section 4(a)(i), replace the word “Positions” with the words “Career positions” in the final paragraph;
(d) in section 4(b)(i), add the text “providing for the application of Civil Service Rule 6.3(a) to Schedule Policy/Career positions and” after the words “as appropriate”;
(e) in section 5:
(i) insert the words “recommend that the President” immediately after the words “petition the Director to” in subsection (a)(i);
(ii) insert the following text at the end of subsection (c):
“(vi) directly or indirectly supervising employees in Schedule Policy/Career positions; or
(vii) duties that the Director otherwise indicates may be appropriate for inclusion in Schedule Policy/Career.”; and
(iii) amend subsection (d) to read “The Director shall promptly recommend to the President which positions should be placed in Schedule Policy/Career.”;
(f) in section 6:
(i) designate the existing text as new subsection
“(a)”;
(ii) insert a new subsection (b) that reads:
“(b) Employees in or applicants for Schedule Policy/Career positions are not required to personally or politically support the current President or the policies of the current administration. They are required to faithfully implement administration policies to the best of their ability, consistent with their constitutional oath and the vesting of executive authority solely in the President. Failure to do so is grounds for dismissal.”
Sec. 4. Conforming Regulatory Changes. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management (Director) shall promptly amend the Civil Service Regulations to rescind all changes made by the final rule of April 9, 2024, “Upholding Civil Service Protections and Merit System Principles,” 89 Fed. Reg. 24982, that impede the purposes of or would otherwise affect the implementation of Executive Order 13957. Until such rescissions are effectuated (including the resolution of any judicial review), 5 CFR part 302, subpart F, 5 CFR 210.102(b)(3), and 5 CFR 210.102(b)(4) shall be held inoperative and without effect.
Sec. 5. Additional Positions for Consideration. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Director shall, after consultation with the Executive Office of the President, issue guidance about additional categories of positions that executive departments and agencies should consider recommending for Schedule Policy/Career.
Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 14003 of January 22, 2021 (Protecting the Federal Workforce), is hereby revoked, and any rules, regulations, guidance, or other agency policies effectuated under Executive Order 14003 shall not be enforced. The heads of each executive department and agency shall review and identify existing agency actions relating to or arising under section 3(e)(v) and 3(f) of Executive Order 14003 (relating to suspending, revising, or rescinding revisions to discipline and unacceptable performance policies) and, as soon as practicable, suspend, revise, or rescind such actions identified in the review.
Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.”
[SOURCE]


I just want to know whether, as American citizens, we can file a civil suit to reclaim our taxpayers dollars from the biden family as they defrauded us? I know blanket pardon cover criminal but do they apply to civil action as well?
The pardons do not apply to civil cases or state criminal cases. It only applies to federal criminal cases.
Is it conceivable then that a class action lawsuit on behalf of American citizens could be brought and discovery, as well as depositions be court ordered?
If they had federal tax problems – they most likely have state income tax problems (if they reside in a state that has an income tax).
True but a civil case brought in Washington DC, Delaware, California or NYC is unlikely to be successful. The judges are Leftist appointed and the jury pool all have TDS.
These days where a case is filed is becoming more determinative of judicial outcome than why it was filed.
Yesterday was probably the best first day in office a US President has ever had. I was very pleased to read he pardoned (or will pardon) ALL of the J6 political prisoners, including one person who tweeted out his profound thanks to President Trump after he had been held for FOUR YEARS AND FOUR DAYS without a trial. What a farce. People need to be tossed in jail over the J6 political prisoners.
Anyway, it sure looks like President Trump learned a thing or two from his first four years in office. Can’t wait to see what else he unveils soon as he attempts to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
Karma has a sweet ring to it!
I can’t remember when I was half this optimistic, Pa!
“succeeds”!
And much of it in SOLITARY Confinement which must surely be against the Law, to put a person there who hasn’t even had a trial?
we need to return to public prisons. Private Prisons are anathema to fair treatment. judges make too much on the backend. that is why there are such draconian sentences for minor drug selling offenses—like “maryjane.” It is a racket! and no i’m not in personal favor of drugs. But i was offered stock in private prisons when they first thought of launching. I read the prospectus, sat there—stunned. i turned it down for i could see “the hunt for heads” to fill the prisons. stock was pennies then. Look at the price now.
`MUSK needs to learn a thing or two too. he wants to get rid of pennies! this is the START of a cashless society. You dont want that. I know I don’t! We have to be ever watchful of these things! I suggest he take a look at GRANT money first.
Awesome meme! We the People have to keep moving forward. We can’t stop this momentum!
Yup, this is no time to go wobbly, this is for sure.
Reporting ready for duty here in snowed-in New Orleans today, Commander-n-Chief.
Course,… we have to use our abundant Mardi Gras beads to make improvised Snow Chains for our tires,… Yet we’re ready to roll, and go break their Cabal rice bowls,…Sir! 💨❄️🌨️😁🇺🇲
Please make they picture of the storming of Washington in a flag and make available for sale
Oh look! The real Oval Office.
I want to see the crying and weeping and fleeing.
I wan t to see many gallows stations being used.
Erected on the National Mall,… and the executions of those found guilty of Treason by a court of law to be carried live on PPV TV,… the proceeds used to help offset the Fed Debt that Joey “Pardons” Biden has left us to deal with.
These firings are a balm to the soul.
I will savor every one of them and then wait patiently for the investigations, arrests, prosecutions, and God willing, convictions and sentencing of those so deserving.
A reckoning is finally at hand. Accountability, then retribution.
Wait, you’re saying that American men are going to destroy their European cousins, and firebomb their hospital cities, in order to transfer trillions to the War Industry?
My goodness, that’s not what *I* voted for. Especially with my entire paternal family being America First men in the 20th century and totally opposed to US involvement in the “two” “world” “wars.”
For the attempted murder of our country the “Follow the money” adage should apply as Yellen announced we will hit the debt ceiling today. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2798
There are several very important points that require exposure to sunlight.
At the confirmation hearing of incoming Treasury secretary Scott Bessent on January 16, Sen Cornyn brought up how there is a proposal for an ‘entity’ to clear U.S. treasury futures at a London clearing house which is overseen by the Bank of England.
#1 Why should American treasuries be cleared in London, through a clearing house under Bank of England’s control?
https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/it-starts-tomorrow-people-vs-the
#2 Where did such a proposal originate from?
From the outgoing SEC chair Gensler according to link below.
https://www.ft.com/content/15fb1589-35ab-4b4e-9af7-b3abd44b7999
#3 Britain’s Starmer was not invited to the inauguration yesterday and Musk was openly attacking lately.
So much for that ‘special relationship’. Was the hand of London seeking to influence or manipulate a collapse of our financial markets?
Motive?
Perhaps greater control of the USA as part of efforts to Trump-proof the UK?
The Under Secretary of State Arms Control and International Security, Bonnie Jenkins on July 25, 2024 signed a Mutual Defense Agreement (who resigned 12/31/2024) with UK which meant UK could keep pushing for more war and US would have to protect them.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66a35cd9fc8e12ac3edb051f/CS_USA_1.2024_UK_USA_Amendment_Agreement_Atomic_Energy_Mutual_Defense_Purposes.pdf
According to the UK amendments were made to do away with the 10 year expirations for renewal and make the MDA permanent and info, equipment will continue to be protected even if agreement is terminated in future.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10086/
Note this went into force on November 14, 2024, after the election.
It appears that the State Department is required to report within 60 days of in force to Congress.
https://www.state.gov/treaty-negotiation-and-signing
But it seems there is precedent to undo such things.
https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/18-interpretation-and-termination-of-treaties.html
Where exactly is McCord right now? Monaco?
This suit should end up being dismissed for lack of standing, based on black letter law. The AGs simply have no litigible interest in what the federal government does regarding citzenship.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/begins-18-democrat-state-attorneys-general-sue-stop/
The only person who would definitely have standing would be a child born to an illegal immigrant who is also actually harmed by a government action or non-action (for examole, being refused a passport or denied Social Security or other federal benefits).
If course, that would mean outing your mom as an illegal alien, and subjecting her to arrest. So.
A DS conundrum, finding a willing plaintiff. Which is why they are trying the AGs first – probably hoping for an injunction while things are being litigated.
It only applies going forward IIRC, so the duty would have to wait many years.
MAGA is BACK!! 👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻
https://www.youtube.com/live/b4_djRDL8WE?si=ZWSXyYctVyvTpUwI
J6 Watch
Golly.
It’s like a dream come true.
I’m gonna sleep sooo well tonight.