Whoa, this is a little unexpected and catches Suspicious Cat a little off-guard. FBI Director Chris Wray actually answers some detailed questions about the attempted assassination of President Trump and the ongoing investigation.
Beware of voices who are saying we should not be paying attention. I am providing some segments below so we can all catch up. WATCH:
“8 Cartridges” – “No other suspects”
.
Jim Jordan gets specific in the next segment:
Drone Recovery in vehicle, with controller – Flight of the drone took place between 3:50 to 4:00pm around the area, approximately 200 yards from the stage – Approximately 11 minutes of drone flight, with livestream – Three explosive devices in both the vehicle (two) and residence (one) – There were receivers with devices and the suspect had the transmitter – Receivers were not turned on, they were in the “off position” – Encrypted platforms relate to social media networks on suspects phone, Signal, Telegram, encrypted messaging apps.
.


I think they’re building the lone gun man narrative. That would end the investigation, they think. Problem is the existing audio analysis suggests two to three shooters. One shooter from a lower position than the roof that had a rising shot that clipped PDJT ear and wounded a spectator in the upper right stands. One burst of gun fire that was possibly from an automatic weapon….
So, I call BS to this testimony.
Hence the guys in 2nd floor dropped brass near crook
That’s what I think. I would love to see if anybody stayed around to film the “ongoing investigation”. That would be eye-opening.
They are and in the end all of this will be reduced to “conspiracy theory” sad but predictable. Nothing will lead to nowhere and all will be rabbit holes that can’t be proven. Look where the select committee in the 1970’s led to. Absolutely nothing.
We are left with nothing but a series of impossible
coincidences that always favor murder, deception, corruption, profit, and cultural/economic decline.
Disgusted in the free state of Florida.
Agree.
Automatic weapons are seldom used by snipers. They aren’t for spot-on hits as the muzzle rises from repeated recoil.
Look at the footage when the first shot rings out, and crooks is being filmed. His shoulder doesn’t move at all.
Yah, and Lee Harvey Oswald was Crooks’ uncle….
Two patsies for the CIA.
I agree! First it was loathsome Democrat Rep Raskin who declared it was a lone gunman. Now Wray says all 8 shell casings were collected on the roof by the shooter making Crooks a lone gunman!!! Total bullshit!!! We’ll never know now! And that is to be expected when the investigators are also perpetrators!!! The audio of the shooting doesn’t support Wray but he doesn’t care about that. It wouldn’t surprise me if the FBI took Crooks rifle and shot it to get additional shell casings to get 8 that match! JMO
When the perpe-TRAITORS are the investigators… we *know they are lying* about every bit of evidence that matters.
That much we *know* is True.
Has anybody looked into the amount of Shorting or puts in the Trump stock in the days before the rally? I believe there was a significant increase in activity.
It was a data entry mistake. Rabbit hole to nowhere.
Does a low level clerk at a hedge fund have the authority to even make that mistake?
Would a CEO or CFO have to sign off on a huge trade of any kind?
The standard SEC report was filed on 12 July to cover the previous quarter through 30 June. Was not any “real time” purchase of put options, even if correct.
Thank you.
They have to balance the books every night. If someone sold, someone bought.
Only on completed transactions. An offer to buy or sell, Calls or Puts, that are not completed or accepted, still affect the price of the options and even underlying stock. Especially large offers. an offer to buy or sell a million contracts will most definitely cause a ripple in the price of the underlying and its contracts. Even if those offers are/were never consummated. This is how the big boys control the stock market. Interest drives price.
We all pray for a bidding war when we want to sell our house. Not much different.
According to the WiseGuys (x.com/JonnyTabacco) chart, shown below, the interest being paid on shorts of $DJT rose from about $7.5 million per day on June 28 to about $15.5 million per day on July 12. This rise is independent of the filing error made and then reversed by Austin Private Wealth LLC. and could be the result of people getting wind of the assassination plot. Martin Armstrong is still concerned. On July 18, he posted: “this warrants an INDEPENDENT investigation.”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTMndfjXoAAQtyb?format=jpg&name=medium
It’s not professionals, it’s to choppy, no direction, no trend. No Pro would trade this with any size. I agree with SD, rabbit hole!
Is there any relationship between the members of the organization that made the shorting “mistake” and the individuals that have been reported shorting TMTG and thereby repressing its price (Ref: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/06/05/trump-media-seeks-investigation-naked-short-selling/73991753007/)?
It started more than just a couple of days prior, early in July, and could easily have been associated with the growing realization that he wouldn’t be running against Biden. More:
Trump’s DJT stock falls as Kamala Harris hits campaign trail
24 Jul 2024
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/07/24/trump-media-djt-stock-kamala-harris/74529655007/
Yep. Somehow there was a “mistake/type-o” from 1,200 to 12,000,000.
yes but they arent answering correctly and i dont think we will see what i want. They said Crooks left 8 rounds on the roof. That means one Gun. We know there were 2 and maybe a 3rd. this is a joke to me, and then off topic its all Trump and the border or Jan 6 or ?? Nothing to do w topic at hand. Im putting this again on the Bullets
V533 | 16:9 | Audible Uploads, Amazon Income Hook 3 (youtube.com)
Be safe everyone
But it reveals subterfuge……someone dropped 8 pieces of brass (silver) on the roof near the crook
All the same caliber or different?
Excellent point. They did the same thing in the schoolbook depository with JFK….dropped shells by the window to indicate a shooter was there.
Planted a perfect bullet on a stretcher as well.
At first it was a mauser then changed to a Manlicher Carcano.
Planting brass and perfect bullets has been done before… Sigh
This is not a criticism.
I did not hear Wray say that crooks fired 8 shots. Wray only said there were 8 cartridges on the roof. He hasnt said where they were found, and by whom.
Nobody asked yet if the rifle found on the roof fired each cartridge, and if each one was fired during the attack on Pres Trump.
We are dealing with creatures who lie just for the fun of it.
I didn’t hear Wray say that Crooks left 8 rounds on the roof. We have to parse his lawyerspeak carefully.
Congressman: “Did Crooks fire 8 shots?”
Wray: “We have recovered 8 cartridges?” [I assume he means 8 expended shell cases; “cartridges” are loaded rounds with case, bullet, powder, primer.]
Wray dodged saying whether the FBI has concluded that Crooks fired 8 shots, and who caused the recovered casings to be on the roof. That reflects Wray’s desire to stick with provable facts then known to the FBI. The way Wray answered reveals that the FBI has not ruled out other shooters, or others dropping casings on the roof.
If that Congressman was going after the second shooter idea, former SS agent Bongino with trustworthy insider sources dispelled that earlier this week by revealing that there WAS a second shooter – a PD counter-sniper team who missed Crooks according to Dan.
The 2nd and 3rd shooters would have been the two LE snipers who shot at Crooks according to others analyzing forensics and reports.
YEP, as confirmed by Bongino via insider info earlier this week.
How come we haven’t introduced to counter sniper? Is he not a hero? So many questions, so little information.
Patsy (Crooks) meet Scapegoat (Cheatle). Will the real assassin please stand up! Watch, we’ll get a patsies patsy.
My typing Sucks today, sorry.
Cheatle waterboard time she knows who gave the order we need to know by any means
The FBI has lied for so long that they no longer have any credibility. So, all I can glean from this is the narrative they want us to believe which most likely bears no semblance to reality.
Yeah, Wray’s lips were moving, a sure sign that smoke is being blown up our backsides.
It works for Wray so why change!
They, both MSM and FBI/Deep State have dug themselves into a grand canyon sized hole they can not possibly dig themselved out of, in that they have bankrupted themselves of credibility.
Perhaps because for so long WE, acting as sheeple, seemed to ‘buy’ whatever b.s. they were selling, they got lulled into believing they had gotten awayvwith so much, for so long, that they can now get away with anything.
But credibility is a key aspect of trust, and while we generally give our trust FAIRLY readily, once we realise it has been abused, its almost impossible to ever restore that trust.
And, ENOUGH of us, and more every day, are reaching that point of realisation that we can not trust our govt. or MSM.
And there is nothing THEY can do to restore that trust.
How long can our country continue to function, without any trust?
Predictions are the MSM will cease to exist w/in 5 years, as their revenues, viewership and influence continues to drop.
I anticipate a move to switch to what they have in Canada, with Govt. subsidies as the only way legacy media can continue.
Beyond that, the only answer is replacement; replace MSM with the rising MAGA media, and replace the current Govt. thru a major housecleaning, via PDJT.
once burned, twice learned, WE will NEVER trust the barstuds, again.
And without that trust, how long can they prop up thevillusion of legitimacy, which is the ONLY thing that actually enables them to rule?
They really don’t care one iota if we do not trust them. Nothing ever stops them from what they are doing. The only thing that may change anything is if there is a Country wide work stoppage.
This may be the last election we ever see.
Exactly!
Trust is a tough issue to wrastle to the ground – but it lies at the heart of everything.
I remain very interested in the disturbing claims of crime scenes being slicked, radio/I-Net communications/mobile phones being slicked, and the shooter’s home being slicked. Same thing with FBI agent comms during Jan 6 debacle being slicked
Things are seriously unbelievable.
They make money from other means to prop up the media. Government and media already work hand in hand. Many media people already work for the intelligence agencies. They are the real “disinformation” specialists.
pHARMa advertising keeps them solvent.
I believe the US media is nearly wholly “subsidized already via mechanisms that have been creeping in.
Government advertising (fed/stete/local) for info , government programs, annoncements
Regulatory required advertising e.g public utility companies, healthcare
NGO and other government funded non-profit advertising
Campaign advertising
Blackrock style monopolistic advertising i.e strings attached to capital and marketshare that require ads placed
Big Pharma ads
all of the above drain the consumers and taxpayers without value-add to the economy.
We all know they are gaslighting. Their performances (i.e. Chuck Schumer) are horribly transparent. They just don’t care.
I want -THIS- question asked: is it NORMAL for indoor events by FLOTUS -AND- VP to occur at the same time and on the same date one hour away from Trump, thereby hogging local SS office assets AND PD assets leading to the two heroic motorcycle cops shown aiding wounded spectators in the grandstand being transferred (punished) because it is claimed they were supposed to be covering the FLOTUS visit?
Absolutely correct
I miss Georgia Representative Doug Collins.
During a Congressional hearings a few years back, he asked a FBI agent if they were in compliance with some statute. I believe it was a polygraph for security clearance. I don’t remember the answer.
It came across as true Sherlockian gotcha question. Nowhere to hide. Either compliant or out of compliance. It should be asked in everyone of these hearings for DHS, FBI, CIA, USSS, NSA, DIA, & any security clearance job. Followed by an immediate new polygraph test to ensure fidelity to the USA.
Color me more than skeptical.
Wray is STILL never to be trusted. Whose body cams? Is this body cam videos of specific personnel taking the shooter down, when shown are narratives and after-event caked blood, absence of casings etc? Where is or are the actual take down body cam videos?
Are you referring to the rooftop bodycam? Did you watch it? Here it is:
Rep. Eli Crane is representing his constituents.
You know,
Just like Clyburn did…
Trust God. Fear not.
He’ll talk about the subject’s drone but he won’t talk about the service’s drone, to include whether or not one was one was even there.
How does a 20 year old kid learn how to make remote detonated
bombs without leaving an online footprint?
Easy. He had a coach, IRL, walk him through it.
How does he get the explosive materials?
How does he learn the design?
Hiw does he figure out the detonation process?
How do his parents, who he lived with, not notice?
This guy had a coach, mentor, groomer.
And my money is on FIB/CAI
A 20 year old wannabe killer w no online presence regarding bomb making?
And he made bombs? Remote detonated bombs?
Either that’s not true (online bomb making searches are negative)
or he had a handler(s) who taught him how to do it.
The encrypted comm claims could account for it,
but I don’t buy that.
This stinks to high heaven
One COULD do the neccesary research the ‘old school’ way, by reading BOOKS, but that would ALSO leave a trail of book purchases, the Anarchists cookbook, old military manuals on ordinance, etc.
Certainly the most logical explanation WOULD be he had someone with knowledge, to help.
Or someone gave him the bombs, detonators, etc.
so he didn’t have to make them himself.
Which seems more likely.
SOMEBODY coached that kid.
The encrypted comms claims is just an excuse to shut those pesky things down.
No doubt. You don’t get many shots at the king. So there would be others to make sure it got done that day. You cant stand down every time. This was coordinated and timed perfectly. There is more to this story. But they will stick with this: Crooks, eight shots, and eight cartridges. End
We need to know who was that person who visited the home several times as well as DC per tracking of this person’s cell phone. Have you seen this kid’s father? He looks like a liberal loon.
The ‘father’ is said to be a “mental health professional”; both parents are claimed to be, IIRC.
In the video of supposed ‘father’ pushing a full grocery cart, his companion/ escort is dressed like Panti-fa…
He (they) could just as easily be a crisis actor.
Doesn’t want to be sh*tcanned like Cheatle was so he throws a few tidbits hoping 45-47 doesn’t sh+tcan him.
Wray needs to be fired. He also needs to be investigated for his actions, lact of actions, as Director.
Oh, pretty sure Wray knows if 45 becomesc45/47, that Wray will be fired on day one, along with the whole 7th floor.
He isn’t worried about job security, the blob will take care of him.
The Leviathan always takes care of it’s workers!
I hope this will occur Dutch. Wray will go back to King&Spald*ng, where he came from Sally Yates went there. They take in a lot of people like them.
Even if they fired him. They have an endless supply of amoral, soulless, sociopaths to take his place.
Everyone I ever knew in any government agency that had any integrity quit, left, or retired etc, long ago.
All those that remain are like that.
Why “the bike”? Why “the 5′ ladder”?
The bike was a recon/entry mobile.
He used it to gain easier access.
The ladder? Why not?
He needed elevation if the roof was covered by security.
Wray said there were 8 shell casings.
But, ex-Director Cheatle said 3 cartridges on the roof.
Someone took Souvenirs, or, another shooter?
Could be 8 total shell casings for all involved.
They have been listening to the reports of the number of shots and now they made the facts meet the information out there. The problem with lying is the lie falls apart as the Truth gets revealed. They lost the MSM propagandists. They have no believably anymore.
They lose.
Okay here’s my comparison.
Eight casings found by the body on a video that just happened to be released by a Republican Senator to give this storyline credibility is comparable to pristine passports being found on a sidewalk after surviving a 400 mph crash into a building with accompanying spectacular fireball.
Or a ‘magic’ almost pristine bullet found on a stretcher, like it just fell out of Kennedys body.
Planted evidence,..
Exactly or the pristine JFK bullet.
Chris Martenson is doing a great job on reviewing what evidence we have.
Its clear to me from the audio we have ‘three’ different firearms involved. The first three were likely from the actual hitman and only barely missed PDJT because of fraction of second head turn from him. The next five where from the patsy “ie lone gun man” on the roof. The last one was used to take out the patsy.
Funny, I watched a detailed audio analyses that came to very different conclusions.
3Shooters, NOT counting the shot that took out Crooks.
First 5 from short range, Crook or the guys near him, then two single shots, one from mid range, one from long range (perhaps water tower).
If indeed there WERE multiple shooters, A) makes PDJT’S survival even MORE of a miracle, B) the brass is CRUCIAL, and if they insist they recovered 8 from Crooks, they are intentionally covering up, theres no other explanation.
ONCE AGAIN, there WERE three shooters:
1. Crooks
2. SS counter-sniper team (hit target)
3. PD counter-sniper team (missed target)
This is via Dan Bongino insiders with Dan saying he is also sick of hearing all of this 2nd shooter speculation.
Winston one thing bothering me is Dan Bongino has been retired for about eight years now, and still has contacts inside SS, but the whole culture has been deliberately changed in the ABC’s . About fifty percent have thrown in the towel and retired in the SS probably because of the changes in culture and maybe that DEI director whose goal was to make thirty percent female.
I’ve listened to Dan’s podcast and he is convinced they are gold. My gut is telling me something smells.
JMHO.
That was cell phone video during a frantic situation. The cell phone was jarred during filming. It wasn’t steady and fluid.
Could the cell phone videographer have positioned his/her hand differently in those few seconds? Yes.
Could said hand movements covered & uncovered the cell phone microphone? Thereby, muffling the first 3 shots, but getting a much louder report on the next 5.
So a mistake was made shorting stock the day before. What are the statistical chances of a mistake that day????
Indeed, Pearson’s chi-squared test or Pearson’s
𝜒2
QUESTION: Does anyone have the early photo/video of the shooter dead on the roof with bloody face and head? Can you post it or a link?
Positive I bookmarked on X but cannot find it.
Saw that too but it “disappeared” within hours or at least by the next day. He took one to the temple area (just above the ear) and the other to the lower jaw. They were clean holes so they appeared to be entry wounds. What is odd is that they were on the right side of his face and given his shooting position a left side entry wound would seem more likely from the counter sniper’s position. Wouldn’t want the public to figure out ballistics trajectory from any actual photos?
This is why Cheato said nothing yesterday….Wray is a Professional BS’er …. she left it for him to handle and she said nothing that he had to align his story to.
If you listened to the recording closest to the building it is VERY obvious the difference between the first 3 and the remaining shots fired.
Wray is paring this down to the simplest minimal scenario to get the case closed !!!
Exactly!!!
Senator Grassley has more details from local law enforcement than (mis)-Director Wray does on communications between the USSS and law enforcement. Sheesh. Independent investigation needed.
What is it SD always says? “Once you see the strings, you can’t unsee them.” Well, once you understand how the IC uses silos, you can see them in testimony.
The other thing that stands out to me (and someone correct me if I’m wrong) … back in boot camp 40 years ago I remember the terminology of “cartridge” referring to a complete round. IOW, primer, gunpowder, case/jacket, and projectile. I find it interesting that Wray says they found “8 cartridges.” Not casings. Maybe I’m off base here, idk.
You are correct. The bullet+powder+primer+shell casing=cartridge or round.
So, Wray is possibly saying what they found were 8 unfired rounds. Which is a great dodge for the question.
8 unfired cartridges? I do not see it.
A standard AR-15 magazine capacity is going to typically be 30, 20 is not as common but it exists. Never mind the one in the chamber.
It is a dodge of a question for sure and will muddle everything in questioning with imprecise language.
I think it is still casings. But accurate terminology doesn’t seem to lean much anymore.
Terminology is important. Words mean things. It’s the difference between answering the question and a clever dodge. Which the Rep didn’t follow up on, btw.
RC because a lot of them have no experience with guns of any kind, or they choose not to follow up.
just curious….
What kind of car and where was it parked?
What kind of ladder design – classic one with rigid rungs, step ladder, or one of the easy carry compact slide lock/folding ones?
Does the 5 foot ladder show any signs of having been used?
What is the story on that bike and square object next to it? Any chance that object is a folding ladder?
did the shooter use any device which would alter the sound of rifle firing?
Early on the MSM showed his vehicle – a van – being loaded onto a car hauler. The van was possibly an older model GMC 9 person van with cargo doors on one side and in the back. Regarding the 5′ ladder the photos and video I’ve seen of the buildings show the ladder on top of an air conditioning unit in front of the building next to the AGR building from which the shooter made his attempt.
I’m positive this was a coordinated attempt.
Not a random psycho.
The kid HAD to have assistance w the bombs,
drone, vehicle.
Bombs: either he was given the tech/materials or there would be a footprint.
Drone: same.
Vehicle: was it his? His parents? Did he rent it?
Again, footprints
“8 Cartridges” – “No other suspects”
Lie 1 – They recovered 8 cartridges on the roof. Did Wray say how many spent casings they recovered on the roof?
Lie 2 – So……….. the FBI only has one guy who they “suspect” may have shot at Trump. That does rule out other shooters who are not “suspects”. If the FBI knew about them, well, they aren’t suspects.
8 cartridges from what type of firearm? any bullets recovered? analysis?
crooks fatal wound trajectory?
Wow; had no intention of listening to any of Director Wray’s testimony because it’s just too hard to listen to hours of “cannot answer, ongoing investigation” responses so this is a nice surprise.
My question – who gave Wray permission to actually answer questions or does Wray feel he now has the freedom to actually respond to questions because his keeper is busy on other projects (i.e. beautification of a certain Presidential wannabe)?
Wray is a lot less stupid now than he was 5 years ago.
Spent shells don’t tell us as much as recovered bullets. 1.) Where are they? 2.) What was the chain of evidence? 3.) Who/how were they tested against the recovered weapon (same questions 1-3 weapon). 4.) What is the process for third party testing/validation?
If the bullets can be recovered….
That venue is a field. The unmolested bullets could have easily traveled 1,000+ yards and landed in the dirt somewhere far away, lodged in a tree, etc. The ones that struck people can be analyzed, though.
Yep … I’d prefer having tangible evidence subject to independent analysis. Just like any other murder … I DO expect some unrecoverable rounds. But we can work with what I have.
Just cannot listen to these liars including azzwipe Jordan. Ask the right fuc*ing questions
It was too hot to check the roof? Come on what a joke!
Hot roof? If the roof was so hot, and steep, it’s curious that the bad guy was able to crawl on his belly and stay in position while having bare arms and a t-shirt. No blanket to lay on, and no cap brim to shield his eyes.
I call BS on his every gesture, inflection and word….no integrity..
Audio experts demonstrate at least 2 shooters, not including the counter sniper….
It is very difficult to watch congress swallow this baited line…….
Feels like covid all over again.
Could it be that the person who supposedly visited the home per cell phone tracking been dropping off these explosives? We need to find out who this person was as that person also visited a building very close to the FBI building in DC. Something does not pass the smell test with Wray being so open in giving evidence. His normal reply has always been: I can’t say anything, there is an investigation going on.
Why cant every person in and around the three letter club building have their cell phones tracked in a public data pull, like this one visiting the kid. Putting the data into a tracking time line. Turn the damn tables of the F’ers. Just like pinging vessel movement globally. I bet that would yield some fine nuggets.
viceroygrey I second that as that is what FBI did to J6 people.
Sloppy protection, sloppy investigation, fits a pattern that kid or pasty exploited a weakness in protection services in America that people thought was first class, and doesn’t come close just more eye opening
The sociopaths have already accomplished their plan B goal of turning this vital campaign time into a tail-chasing forensic carnival. No one in the agencies can be trusted so come up with your own conclusions. Meanwhile get back to the critical job at hand: exposing evil Harris and her network.
We can get back to the theories after the voting.
“8 cartridges—no other suspects”; so Crooks got off 8 shots before the sniper took him out???
I was born at night, but not last night!
From Laura Loomer on Twitter
@chiproytx
just asked FBI Director Chris Wray if any FBI agents have expressed displeasure over the fact that Donald Trump survived the assassination attempt.
Wray said there have been at least 2 instances…and said one of those agents has been “referred”… whatever that means.
So in other words, we have FBI agents who are working at the agency responsible for the investigation of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump who wanted him dead.
This is disgraceful!
This is what is surprising – that Wray answered with one of those agents has been referred instead of his standard “I cannot discuss personnel matters within the agency”.
Perhaps the agency realized it has gone too far in alienating the citizens of this nation with their weaponization and this is the beginning steps they have decided to take to try and walk back public perceptions.
Turn it over to the Texas Rangers.
I’ve never seen Comey this open about anything. He saw that this was a bi-partisan agenda, with no protection from Contempt of Congress and/or impeachment from the Dems.
This is how it should ALWAYS take place.
Still not asking the right effing questions.
So, Mr. Wray, How did you feel when you found out the mission to eliminate President Trump failed?
Did anyone ask wray if the fbi had a presence at the rally and/or leading up to the rally? If so, what was their mission?
People who, like Wray, talk out both sides of their mouth, should be removed from any authority whatsoever.
Simple questions require simple answers.
Wray could have said: “We don’t provide real time information about this investigation if we think it will harm the investigation.” Simple.
We don’t want to alert the “crooks” we are getting close to them.
If I was in charge of FBLie, I wouldn’t give out all the mistakes and all the security details that would allow a perp to avoid getting shot if it’s tried again.
If you owned a bank that got robbed would you want a highly detailed account published of how it was done? There is a balance that can be transparent but not endanger people in the future.
If someone broke into your home would you publish on social media exactly how it happened? Which window, what door, parts of the yard not visible, location of security cameras and layout of your home and yard?
I understand all the emotion, and suspicion is warranted, but common sense says there are some details we won’t get. I am not letting Wray off the hook, just some reality here.
Wray trying to redeem himself and not be prosecuted for everything from J6 to Lawfare charges against President Trump. Wray knows he’s being fired!
Leavenworth is appropriate.
Oh great. They are going into great detail about the Patsy.
How predictable.
Has anyone asked Ray if it was an inside job? Why were federal employees visiting Crooks at his home? Why did Crooks go to DC several times?
What about those encrypted off shore accounts?
So Wray is only focusing his investigation on the shooter. Who is investigating all of the SS mistakes made and when do we hear who allowed him on stage and why didn’t they hold him back? Who determined that no roof coverage on the building where “shooter” shot from? How come SS had no drones that day and who made that decision. Why are all the communications from that day missing?
more curiosities…
In the roof top video, why do we not see shell casings? Or at least markers showing where the casings landed.
Do the clothes on the body match what the suspect was wearing when previously caught in photos or videos?
In an earlier photo it sorta looks like the gun is being pulled from under the shooter. Is that the actual gun used by the shooter we see in the roof top video?
The US government employs a vast fleet of surveillance equipment from satellites in space to remote piloted aircraft to simple drones: all for the purpose of visualizing areas of interest.
What assets did they have on this event? If none, then why none? Who made the call?
These questions the Uniparty does not want you to think about and they don’t want to have to answer.
Which gun(s) did the bullets get fired from?
Wray read the tea leaves. He couldn’t stonewall like Cheatle. But…
He clammed up about “how many” anti sniper teams there were, and about who took the kill shot. And what about the law enforcement drone up by the water tower? Crickets. He also wouldn’t say who the assassin spoke too or what the results of geo tracking showed.
But Matt Gaetz’s questioning was brilliant. Had Wray met with Biden to brief him over the last few years(yes)? Had he noticed Biden’s decline as pointed out by even Adam Schiff? (No). Keep asking this question of every government official who meets with Biden. They are either lying or very bad at their job.
Dan Bongino said today that J13 was also supposed to be a mass casualty shooting of Trump supporters.
Crooks had lots of ammo and after he fired the first 3 careful shots at Trump, he started spraying bullets before the SS sniper took him out. IMHO
“Encrypted platforms relate to social media networks on suspects phone, Signal, Telegram, encrypted messaging apps.”
This right here is not good for free speech nor privacy. They will now target encrypted apps, just like they do gun control. Those are apps that IC cannot control…yet. We have to make sure they cannot get their demonic tentacles on these. Regardless If that demon-possessed Shooter Was using them, American citizens need to be Insured privacy from thought police.
Generally, Americans do not have access to encryption that the US government has not already broken. So, unless the app is a foreign app, the government already has a backdoor into it, like TOR.
Here is my theory :
Crooks was recruited as part of a Red Team test (a test of security, query Red Team TSA, Red Team DHS, etc for detailed information).
Crooks was instructed to carry a suspicious device (range finder) and to act in a way to draw attention. Then, he was to climb to the roof and shoot the rifle, which he was told was loaded with blanks.
Key security people at the venue were informed that there would be a Red Team test of security, and therefore to expect unusual activity.
When suspicious activity was detected and reported, no action was taken to extract President Trump because key personnel (or individual) believed it was a Red Team test.
Reporting officers were directed to abstain from taking action. Hesitation and confusion would now follow.
Crooks and the actual assassin opened fire. Crooks died, the assassin escaped.
Crooks’ material found in the car was either planted, or Crooks had been directed to bring it for a potential test.
Crooks’ house was cleansed of evidence of his participation in a Red Team rest.
Personnel onsite were told to shut up, or face prosecution as accessories to murder.
Note: DHS is fond of Red Team tests because they 1. give the illusion that DHS cares about security, and 2. They are used as control measures, by punishing those who fail the tests. Its a kind of mental bullying.
Too convoluted. Does not pass the Occam’s Razor test. Assumes a level of thinking, planning and manipulation that the USSS simply does not have.
It’s not too complicated. Actually, it aligns with the actual “mistakes that were made” by the SS. EMET’s assessments or thoughts on this are very probable; the scenerio does two things- provides simple cover for the fools who planned it and it provides an explanation for why the locals seemed confused.
It also provides an avenue to explain why the local are not necessarily playing along with the narrative creation.
Crook’s role might have been to just act and look suspicious.
Crooks was not the shooter on the roof.
The roof shooter was Yearick, who fired 3 times.
The released photo is of Yearick not Crooks!
Crooks is likely still alive but nicely disappeared.
The Real assassin shot five times from inside the building likely from the open window.
Local police sniper shot Yearick on the roof with one shot for 9th shot fired.
There was somebody on top of the water tower.
This person may have fired one shot for 10th shot?
Was it at real assassin at window?
Wray is lying.
Who is Yearick? Your last sentence is most believable.
T2020 – Here is research info I have: “a man with long brown hair and ear piercings, who was arrested in 2016 following an altercation with police while protesting Trump’s visit in Pittsburgh and sentenced to three to 12 months after pleading guilty to assault.” See this url: https://www.wtae.com/article/pittsburgh-donald-trump-protesters-sentenced-to-jail-time/9261199
That’s eerie.
That’s interesting, and here’s a link with more info on Maxwell Yearick.
https://coldfury.com/WRSA/WRSA-WP/page/6/
The Maxwell Yearick as the shooter theory has been floating around since the day after the assassination attempt. The side by side photo comparison of Yearick’s mugshot and the dead shooter (Crooks) is wishful thinking.
Look at the facial hair. Yearick has full stubble around chin and jawline. Crooks looks like he can barely grow anything, not to mention it’s lighter in color.
The eyebrows are different in shape and in color, with Yearick’s being fuller and darker.
Finally, look at the bridge of the nose. Crooks has a thin, very sloping nose; Yearick’s nose is wider and more pronounced
Did anyone check the dead perps eyes? The photos of yea rick have blue eyes. I appears that Crooks has brown eyes.
Yearick, not yea rick. Don’t know how that happened.
Spell check didn’t recognize the name Yearick, so auto corrected to yea rick.
I also heard about the Yearick info. The white van….has Arizona tags and is tied to Yearick! The body cam footage released by Grassly has an officer asking about a possibly deceased person…in that van! Yearick from what I understand…has family in Arizona!
I also saw cell phone footage of a guy that the Secret Service had arrested or detained right after the event….who looks like Yearick!
The USSS did not plan it.
I agree, but the USSS went willingly, knowingly, along with those who DID plan it.
I’m sick to death of people bleating “occam’s razor” anytime anything more complex than “2+2” is raised as a plausible theory.
Typically these are the same people who refuse to believe “conspiracies” exist or that those in power routinely plot and conspire to increase their power at the expense of others (read “Legacy of Ashes. The Untold History of the CIA” for some eye-opening examples).
Anyone with an iota of understanding of history knows that conspiracies are the norm, not the exception and that governments are just legitimized theft and control. The world is run by very evil people who follow only one rule: do whatever it takes to gain and retain power.
Donald Trump represents an existential threat to those people, and they have been gradually working their way through their “tried-and-true” playbook of contingencies.
And while their failure to kill Trump is a temporary set-back, they will keep trying, escalating their tactics each time a previous one fails (maybe next time a CIA induced heart-attack or starting WW3).
Anything required to keep a death grip on their global hegemony.
“The world is run by very evil people who follow only one rule: do whatever it takes to gain and retain power.”
That is the basic lesson of Orwell’s 1984.
Once you see this, you see it everywhere in various forms with various veils. Not just top leadership.
Plausible. There have always been “Drills” before/during mass casualty orchestrated FF events, ie. 911, Boston+++;
that method/practice would scale.
FF playbook includes “drills”.
I whole-heartedly believe the assassin(s) slipped away unnoticed.
Yet… IF the early photos & recently released body cam record of the dead boy on the roof are authentic, the boy was killed a distance beyond arm’s reach from the weapon he supposedly used.
Nope.
He fired that weapon an instant – or even seconds – before being killed by a sniper??? That did not happen.
imo he’s the 2nd casualty.
I’m confident the perpe-TRAITORS have had plenty of time to come up with plausible-deniability answers for the questions people/we’ve been asking as they listen in… not that one (yet).
They just keep repeating the boy’s name as ‘THE shooter’ expecting people to assume it’s True & believe it.
More than plenty of time to manufacture evidence & falsify anything as well.
Repetition is a learning, an hypnosis, and a mind-control device/tactic, all three.
The patsy- boy was murdered too; 3 wounded, 2 murdered in Butler, PA on J13.
A drill gone live. This is the phrase I’ve heard over the years (Boston bombing etc). Only certain people know it’s a drill. For everyone else it’s real and that’s why people get so ticked off by the phrase “false flag” when people are truly injured or killed.
I remember a press conference for the scamdemic early on… Pompeo said “live drill”…
Trump said “you should have told me”.
“False flag” does not reference a fake attack, but rather a real attack that is falsely attributed to someone who did not perpetrate it.
Not a matter of who gets hurt, but rather who gets blamed.
If (whoever it could be) wants Trump dead and can successfully maneuver a shooter within 400 yards, then they kill him, period. They don’t dink around setting up a 20-year-old nerd with his daddy’s gun. It’s called “mission orientated” or mission priority. And, you also don’t mess around with exfil. The best, uncovered location for a sniper with the water tower, and (apparently, from all evidence available) no one shot from there.
As others have said, the OP’s theory is also too complex. Each person and act don’t just add another dimension to risk, it quadruples it. You don’t increase risk on an already complex and risky mission.
If you’re planning on “killing the king”, you do a “Kennedy”, not “Laurel and Hardy”.
I certainly believe that the Obama-Biden cabal had a whole lot to do with the diminished and ineffective security around Trump. However, that could be as much incompetence and spite, as some effort to allow an uncontrolled 3rd party to assassinate Trump. They remain accountable for the attempt on Trump’s life, even if they were passive actors in that attempt.
Don’t attribute to complex conspiracy that which is best explained through simple incompetence. (Well, that and pure hatred of Trump and his supporters.)
You always need a patsy. A patsy gives closure, and is valuable for political purposes. A patsy is integral to the plan, and plans that have complex moving parts are actually preferable, because they are difficult to unravel during an investigation.
If your stated mission is to protect someone’s life, but your covert mission is to take that person’s life, unless you want to show yourself as the culprit, you need a patsy.
Hanson’s law doesn’t apply here.
It postulates that which can be explained (not is best explained) by incompetence.
IMHO what happened July 13 has already grown far too many hydra heads of coincidence and suspicion (especially the previous day’s shorting of Trump related stocks and the fact that he was essentially placed on stage instead of being removed from it). The “can” is a “can not.”
“…incompetence and spite…”, “…pure hatred of Trump and his supporters“.
It doesn’t have to be black and white, either incompetence or animus-driven – it can be both, and it can be apolitical ignoramuses manipulated by schemers, and ignoramuses who find out what is going on and join the manipulators to hide it out of tribalism, and any number of combos.
Crooks wasn’t killed by a sniper. He was shot in the back of his head and the blood flowed down over the side of his face and then flowed down the roof. It was dried by the time law enforcement decided to risk climbing on the roof–despite the pitch. And, the rifle was about “ten feet away” from Crooks’ body (https://www.brighteon.com/1b64fd41-5579-4162-9014-95bca29d701f).
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/gunshot-re-enact-shows-bloodspray-head-pieces-absent/
There was a man (perhaps Mayorkas) on-scene who walked away looking dejected when the shot was missed.
So, when Crooks missed the shot–someone came around and executed him.
Agree.
Had Crooks’ head caught a round from a sniper’s rifle (.308 or .300 win mag or whatever) it would’ve ‘sploded real good all over the place.
If you look carefully at the pic of the dead guy you can clearly see the back of his head is gone.
He was shot in the mouth or there appears to me a round hole in the right eyebrow.
It is also clear he was laying dead on his face and the image was taken after he was moved to get a face shot.
My guess is he was shot in the face, and his head just dropped right on his nose. So the sniper kill shot was somewhere out in front of him. And not to the side.
Further it is reasonable to think leo moved the gun once he was approached just by habit, to secure the assailants weapon.
Yep, entry was top left of face, exit back right of head.
You can see a flap of skin hanging on the back lower right
Lines up with counter snipers post.
Solid shot.
There was also a lot of blood on the roof. Some have said there wasn’t enough blood to indicate being hit in the head.
Could have been subsonic full metal jacket ammo.
Crooks didn’t take THE shot.
That shot was taken by a professional and the Hand of God made it miss.
They weren’t gonna let a patsy take the kill shot.
The team inside the building were close enough to Crooks to shoot him with a pistol.
Didn’t they also have a good line of sight to where President Trump was standing?
No one has seen the actual images of the shooter after being taken out. This so called re-enactment can not be based on anything other than a lot of assumptions.
This weird jump-cut foreign language speaker wears sunglasses because “it’s serious”? Then makes assertions about Hunter’s control over Joe? Hunter’s laptop data says otherwise. Ashley’s diary says otherwise. This woman’s whole presentation is garbage and rather suspect.
It’s not convoluted or too complicated. The same criticism was directed at the JFK theories that weren’t of the single shooter narrative. We know Dallas PD was involved. The USSS was involved. The mafia was involved. FBI was involved. IC was involved. Nothing about JFK was Occam Razor-esque.
What kid has that level of courage (or stupidity) to sit in the open with a range finder for everyone to see? Who climbs on a roof knowing LEOs are swarming the area? I agree he behaved as if he had permission to wander around, get past security, climb on a roof… making enough noise to be obvious. My only contention with your analysis is Crooks didn’t get off a single round much less 8 (where are the pictures and video evidence of the spent casings). He was the distraction.
Have you ever actually handled. rifle blank cartridge? A dim whittled 12 yer old would immediately notice the difference.
But keep tryin.
This is why the mainstream voter dismisses true conspiracy theories,,because there is so much bullshit laid out.
If Crooks was meant to be the scapegoat, isn’t it somewhat common sense that he was told where to find the rifle with a full magazine and a round already in the chamber, and therefore never saw the ammunition before shooting? I think that’s plausible. Not very likely, but still plausible.
I did not say Crooks handled blank cartridges.
+1… no you didn’t. Some people get emotional sloppy in times like these.
In this instance, I agree.
Whenever we see mass amounts of stupid introduced into a major event, it is often government spooks initiating the obfuscation and fantasy so that it can easily be shot down at their convenience.
Well, that’s one of MY pet conspiracy theories.
Correct, 5.56 mm military blanks are crimped where the bullet would be exposed. Also, the blank would not cycle the bolt without a blank firing adapter. What I find interesting is that pic of the rifle on the roof appears to have an aimpoint sight instead of a scope. Yet, I saw a pic of an FBI agent holding the purported rifle with a scope that looks to be 4-10x power. Red dot optics have no magnification, and the red dot is large enough to make such a precision shot highly doubtful.
Here’s my two cents. Maybe the government has discovered some way to make people do these things. A chip. Some kind of hypnosis. It’s a weird.
MK Ultra…look it up.
I think it’s legit.
It’s called MK Ultra by Cee Eye Aye
Concur. In the past DHS personnel in staff positions have been called to HQ elements to attend cryptic meetings with no clear message or purpose. The narrative was security related, vague watch out for bad guys’ stuff. Of course. staff returns to field locations and replicates the vague, not sure what the F^%$ nature of the message and everyone goes back to business scratching heads.
End result, Red Team introducing confusion and tension into already chaotic missions and producing no operational benefit.
Crooks would be able to tell the difference between blanks and bullets.
https://images.app.goo.gl/ELMEqiESgLbkrCGx5
If he was told he’d be shooting blanks he wouldn’t be aiming so well. The bullets seemed to be coming from Crook’s rooftop which was the only venue set up perfectly for a shooter.
Too many “stupids” in that. The Secret Service does not “TEST.” You do not perform “TESTS” among the public (unpredictable outcomes)!
Too many of the past events attempted to draw cover using “tests/drills” in the event of failures or as a way to create confusion or an excuse for coincidental REAL situations occurring. We know their game… or at least we SHOULD by now.
But the Secret Service is specifically unique in the sense that there is no way on this planet they would conduct tests or drills with a live actual protectee in the area.
Do yourself a favor and stop looking for “answers.” Answers come when they come, if they come. Instead seek to identify the QUESTIONS and especially those which go unanswered and unaddressed. The main reason for this is when you think you have an answer, it will completely bias your inquisitive mind to favor anything which supports your ideas and reject those which do not. The IC knows this which is why they inject false theories and evidence into the mix.
By tracking questions and the responses the picture will paint itself more completely than if you worked to build a theory on your own.
immediately after what’s his face was cleared in the shooting on a movie set, was it the same weekend? So obvious….
The entire thing sounds like BS to me. These guys are in their secret underground bunker scrambling to put a believable narrative together to distract from their failed engineered assassination attempt. Everything else they tried has failed. Taking DJT out of the picture was their last desperate gasp.
I did notice that Bishop asked Wray how many shots Crooks fired and Wray answered that they recovered 8 cartridges on the roof. He didn’t say that Crooks fired them, did he? Now, I haven’t listened to the entire Wray testimony yet, but when asked how many shots a person fired, you’d think the answer would be “eight,” not that they recovered 8 cartridges. I also haven’t read all the comments yet, so excuse me if I’m repeating what others have said already.
I’ll post this. More videos at John E. Hoover and John Cullen at Patreon (subscription required, but worth it). There was more than one shooter from the acoustical forensics analysis.