Tucker Carlson interviews his friend Tulsi Gabbard. Those who remember Tucker Carlson’s term on Fox News will remember Gabbard as a frequent guest of his on the show. Within this interview it is easy to spot the “as you well know” aspect to the length and depth of their friendship.
Tulsi Gabbard was former Vice-Chair of the DNC and a strong supporter and advocate for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democrat presidential primary. Within the interview, Tucker emphasizes the possibility of Gabbard as a selection for a Donald Trump running mate. In fact, the topic is so frequent within the interview, it appears the primary purpose of the interview itself is to strengthen Gabbard as a VP possibility.
The interview has the feeling of intent within it; a feeling of script; perhaps, a feeling of a pantomime playing out in the form of an interview. The emphasis for Gabbard’s value is shaped in the interview narrative that ‘foreign policy’ would be her benefit to President Trump. However, as noted by the experience of the first term of President Trump, and as noted within the outcomes of that term, Trump’s foreign policy is quite good with him at the helm of it. WATCH:
As a possible policy emissary, or deputy in-line cabinet member, Tulsi Gabbard has some value. [Deputy, not Primary] However, as a Vice President the ‘trust factor’ must remain the most important element to the success of term two. As a result, from my perspective, Tulsi “Bernie” Gabbard would be a, “nice try Tucker,” but no.
Chapters:
00:00:00 Intro
00:09:20 Why Tusli Gabbard left the Democratic Party
00:26:31 Hillary Clinton’s baseless accusations against Gabbard
00:30:26 Who’s truly running the government right now?
00:32:28 Congress and financial corruption
00:40:03 Tulsi Gabbard’s change in perspective
00:57:07 Donald Trump’s VP
Transparency makes it more difficult to create narratives.
MAGADOME VP 2024… is better then the crossfire sh!t show.
“This was like Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein, when Hillary Clinton said it about them… that they were agents of Russia.”
The MAGADOME VP race… is hotter then primary.
Top rate Tv. Breaking records. My opinion only.
“Trump broke through.” – Tulsi Gabbard
“The interview has the feeling of intent within it; a feeling of script; perhaps”
I felt that way after her 3rd appearance on Tucker/Fox.
“A feeling of a pantomime playing out in the form of an interview.”
A lot of his interviews feel like that. Kid Rock’s interview was just an infomercial for his summer concert tour with a Bud Light endorsement as well. The sunglasses and beer drinking was just over-the-top theatre.
Well, if you want a bonafide willing War CRIMINAL !
One thing that needs to be considered is who will expand and strengthen the ticket. Not saying Tulsi is 100% but I think she’s better than any old guard GOP
PDJT has already expanded and strengthened the ticket, plenty.
His VP needs TWO qualities, Loyalty and to act as an Insurance Policy against removal from office.
In order to have a succesful second term, he can NOT be hamstrung by constant threat of removal from office, and the only way to insure that, is POLITICS: have a VP that so terrifies his neverTrumper RINO and DEM enemies, that they would choose not to pursue any coarse of action to remove him.
He knows it, andhis nemesis mitch knows it, just as both have known for some time PDJT was generating a level of support”too big to rig”.
Hence, Mitchs attempt to preempt, by conveying the offer of a bribe, to the one person who provides such Insurance coverage, AND meets the “Loyalty qualification” as well.
Mike Flynn would satisfy your VP requirement.
General Flynn would unite the base, that gets us 40%, we need 50% plus. Not enough.
Winner winner, chicken dinner
Not for me…
Ready for incoming. Look up his “prayer” at Hank Kunnemans church and where it came from. Easy to find.
After that a couple friends and I weren’t such big Flynn fans anymore, it creeped all of us out. So much so, one of them did a deep dive and found that he studied psychological warfare under the guy who started the church of set, Michael Aquino, aka church of satan. That one wasn’t so easy to find…basically scrubbed.
Look up his call for “one religion.” Easy to find.
No thanks
Kari Lake or Dr. Ben Carson.
Kari lake is locked into senate, stop. Dr Carson would be a base uniter only, no one is going to change their vote cause of Carson. They would for tulsi.
We need to win, to do that we need to get outside our comfort zone, our base needs to expand.
Not if it means taking on people who are not TOTALLY MAGA and have been for some time. Everyone has had a chance to see what Trump will do as President. If that isn’t enough for them they are dumb as a rock.
Ben Carson is weak and ineffectual. Id be fine with her Lakeness!
Stephen Miller would scare the pants off them – but please no photos ….
Amen….!
I’ve been watching Tulsi videos from a year or more back. She’s consistent, which liars and politicians have a hard time with. She admits mistakes. She and Trump agree on war and nation building. I think she will have Trump’s back, and noone else makes me feel that way. I can’t see any way that she could be bought. She left Congress on her own with 3 months in the bank, not rich like the usually are. Flynn should take over the CIA. He isn’t a politician. Vivek is native born and not eligible. Everybody else is filler for departments.
Lake and Carson are certainly wonderful people. Both are skilled, strong and capable. But there are levels to this. They are not cut from the stuff that make an upper-level executive; the kind of executives who function instinctively, who instinctively grasp what is needed to dominate and prevail amidst a torrentential sh*it storm of dire unexpected complexities.
The knack to continuously get it right more often than most and under the worst of circumstances is a special trait.
Trump is the living breathing icon of those traits. Trump is the Apex Executive.
Without trying Trump made Pence, Romney and the rest look like a gaggle of cardboard cut-out Cupie Dolls. You can say that about the whole gaggle of GOPe inflatables, not one real goose among the whole honkin’ gaggle.
Gabbard is genuine category buster. She navigated a rattlesnake pit in Congress and emerged with her character intact. She stood firm amidst great treachery of her political colleagues, a subterfuge of avarice and malice, and did not become what she said she hated, and stayed true to herself and her principles and her rightful duty. The lifelong surfer girl surfed the worst of waves and rode them all to a proper result.
She might not get the VP nod, but her story and her apparent strength of character, vitality and the nature of her being seem well suited. She is principled but not dogmatic. She exudes candor, a love of duty and loyalty, and the patient intelligence to defend it calmly and not be reduced or subsumed.
I was impressed how Gabbard got right in Hillary’s sh*t in Hillary’s house and called her out as every venal Democrat colleague either abandoned or betrayed her. Tulsi walked away intact and did so through one of the nastiest rattlesnake pits on Planet Earth: the inner circle of the DNC elite.
To heal a nation, compassion and quality of candor that can penetrate the fear and bias programmed into the others by the malicious condescending lying cretins of the Uniparty and the ever-neurotic Babylon media parlor pretenders.
I trust that Gabbard deeply loves this nation. I trust that Gabbard has game. I trust that Gabbard’s good faith is unshakable and that she is a competent and tenacious trustee of our shared interest against the promiscuities of special interests.
If there is a better potential VP candidate for Trump, I have yet to notice them. I have not seen better poise or candor; I have not seen a more natural credence or comforting elocution. She radiates duty, loyalty, caution, discipline and brotherhood. The dignity is real and tested.
The surfer gurl knows how to ride a wave. Trump might pick someone else for party-based reasons, but for the good of the nation overall and the towering demands for awakening and healing ahead, Trump & Tulsi may be just the ticket to heal the nation across the complex diversity of interests and restore the mutuality of trust and being that makes a nation and its government great and keeps it so.
Don’t just Make America Great Again.
Make American Government Great Again.
Personally, I am done with our nation’s government being the Bud Light of the modern world.
Joe – 100% agree. I’ve been following Tulsi ever since she gave the bird to the DNC over sabotaging Bernie’s campaign. Tulsi is smart, level headed, and easy to like. As long as Trump wins and has a successful term like we all know he will, I truly think Tulsi could be a healing agent for this nation as a 2028 candidate. And I think the quality gap between Tulsi and other VP potentials is huge. She is the best choice. We need conservative rule after Trump wins the 2024 election. That is what Trump is for. But we may need more moderate rule after that. That is what Tulsi is for. I say Trump/Gabbard 2024 with pride.
We have her voting record in Congress. 100% with Barak Obama.
She has changed parties since then. Reagan was a Democrat once, too.
I just don’t think Tulsi will be Trump’s VP pick.
I think I agree…but not because Trump knows what he’s doing. Trump’s record on personal choices has ranged from pathetic to disastrous. It’s clear he has no idea what makes a good department head, VP, cabinet member, or Supreme Court Justice (and I don’t care that he offloaded this task to the Federalist Society, at the end of the day he made the final call). In fact, Id say personal has been his very worst function as our President.
My guess is he’ll pick a loser who will suck.
Which is too bad because he deserves much better.
I would bet on Doug Burgum being vp.
Not sure what Tucker’s infatuation is with T-Gab.
She’ll always be a hard pass to me because I can never trust her.
I think she’s another Uniparty cog looking for a place to trip things up in a Trump administration.
Exactly!
Like John Bolton or Mike Pence.
But who CAN you trust? She’s as trustworthy as any of the others.
That is a pretty low standard when PDJT is trying to save this country.
Kari Lake? General Mike Flynn? Peter Navarro? Dr. Ben Carson? How about raising our standards to people of this caliber instead of some talking head who supported Bernie in 2016 and has done much in her career but hang out on talk shows and podcasts.
Exactly – this is the reason we can’t find people loyal to MAGA and Trump. People are always willing to settle for some shiny object rather than the real deal – even Trump!
Ill give you Keri, but these others are net negatives that lose you Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Virginia, Michigan….and bring nothing in the way of dynamism to the ticket. Loyalty only matters if you Win…the….election. The rest is meaningless.
Choosing the tallest pigmy, the cutest fat girl, the least offensive smelling turd– generations of employing such a strategy to elect officials can only result in producing exactly the type of government under which we now suffer. There is no other possible outcome.
Were President Trump to choose the likes of Tulsi Gabbard for a running mate, such a move would be more than enough reason for me to withdraw any support for him. A repeat of the blatant display of poor judgement and lack of due diligence regarding personnel choices that he showed in his first term is something that what remains of this republic, is unlikely to survive.
(Can you say “William Barr”? How ’bout “Mike Pence”?)
I think we agree on so much, but disagree on Tulsi. you’re right his poor judgement on personnel doomed his first term, but I think Tulsi would be contrary to the kinds of people he typically picks. And that’s why I think it would work….again, provided she: 1) Vowed not to run in 28, changed her tune on abortion, and changed her tune on health care.
There are hundreds of people with constitutionalist bona fides going back to the tea party movement. Gabbard shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a Trump administration.
I like Tulsi, just not enough to put her in charge of anything.
she hates your 2nd amendment freedoms
hard pass
Tucker – wise up before those of us who like you change our minds. No Tulsi. And the idea that she has more savvy than Trump on foreign policy is absurd. What, exactly, is that idea based on? Sorry, Tucker, GETTEROUTTAHERE.
Unfortunately there is no person under consideration for Trump’s VP who has a great “trust factor”. On foreign policy I’d trust Tulsi as much or more than most of them.
You can’t just say ‘Trump will handle foreign policy”. The Swamps hatred of Trump is based exclusively on his foreign policy, and they will remove him from office if his VP is somebody willing to give in to them on that subject.
Yup, PDJT’s foreign policy views/actions threatens the Swampers’ rice bowls.
I love Tucker but have never understood – and don’t like – his infatuation with Tulsi Gabbard. I can’t stand her and sure don’t trust her. Just a gut feeling but I’m usually right about that stuff.
maybe because she looks good from afar, but far from good looking?
That comment reminds me of something I saw many hundreds of years ago in a Mad magazine (tells you how old I am). It starts off showing a blond what appears to be a smashing woman coming towards the man. As she gets closer, things start to change and she begins to look more and more unattractive until when she arrives, she is a totally ugly woman in every way.
I had a hard time with Tucker’s school girl “for sure” all the time, come on PLZ
Never trust the Johnny-come-latelies.
dutchman said here: “His VP needs TWO qualities, Loyalty and to act as an Insurance Policy against removal from office.”
Ben Carson and Kari Lake fit that requirement 100%. And without question. Any specific shortcomings either might have in foreign policy, in economics, or in management capability can be addressed with an appropriate choice of personnel to advise them.
The way things are shaping up, stealing the 2024 election cycle, especially for control of the Congress, is the only sure means the Democrats and their RINO/UniParty fellow travelers now have for keeping Donald Trump out of the White House.
What we witnessed in Arizona in 2022 tells us that no pre-election lead in the polls is big enough by itself to overcome a determined, well-funded, and well-coordinated scheme to steal an election.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. Time is short. If we don’t start seeing visible evidence that ongoing election integrity efforts are having the necessary positive impacts, and soon, then we will find ourselves watching history repeat itself in November of 2024.
“will find ourselves watching history repeat itself in November of 2024”
We’re pretty much floating toward that point already.
To me it seems people are still waiting for the Q Team to show up.
“To me it seems people are still waiting for the Q Team to show up.”
That’s about the size of it. Lots of work is being done by lots of people. But the outcome of all that work has to be a reasonable assurance that election fraud will not be the deciding factor in 2024.
In other words, to be confident that all which could be reasonably accomplished before November actually has been done.
It is late March of 2024 and I’ve seen no evidence so far that a Q Team which can supply the necessary financial and coordination resources has actually shown up to rescue the situation.
I simply cannot buy that a person who once supported Bernie Sanders is now a reliable candidate for any position in a Trump administration. Just the fact she ever supported someone like Sanders makes her judgment totally questionable. Nothing she says now could convince me otherwise.
🎯
In the clip Tucker plays of her at CPAC she says, “Our democracy is under attack.” Conservatives don’t refer to our country as “Our democracy.”
And that white streak of hair reminds me of a skunk.
She does not pass the smell test.
I haven’t given up on using the word democracy. Am I still allowed to be conservative?
I should give up on using the word conservative- it means different things to different people.
Those who love our country and its Constitution are patriots.
Our country is a republic.
Our country is a nation.
Our country is one nation under God.
Gabbard is Hindu. Hindus have many gods.
Our Constitution was ratified by unanimous consent in the “year of Our Lord.” A Hindu is of a different mindset from someone who tries to follow the teachings of “our Lord.” So, by my definition of conservative, a Hindu falls outside those for whom the country was founded. This does not mean Article 1 is a contradiction. Article 1 assumes that religion requires consent. Therefore, no religious test and freedom or liberty must be present in order to choose your religion.
Even those who choose no religion, have a religion- a set of beliefs that define their values hierarchy.
We have people who identify as fiscal conservatives, social conservatives, three legged stool conservatives, small government conservatives, strong defense conservatives, Black conservatives, gay conservatives,Christian conservatives, Jewish conservatives and Hindu conservatives, etc. etc.. If things keep going the direction we’re going we’ll have transgender communist satanic conservatives before too long.
The Constitution states:
– “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,”
And it was done for specific purposes and for a specific people and their posterity.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Our Union is under attack. Our House is divided.
So only Christian churchgoers are qualified to be President in your mind? I’m sorry, but I’ve been stepped on by too many ‘christians’ for that to matter. Have you noticed that the Democrats always speak out in churches when the going gets tough? Actions count more for me than talk, and being deployed multiple times to various countries and being a combat veteran counts more for me than where she goes to church. You should look up her service record. No other candidate has one. Or treat her like we treated the nippons and throw her out for not being politically correct.
Lots of people in the military with poor judgement. Lots of people who try to use their service as resume enhancer. By your logic, DeSantis, Kerry, McCain,Buttigieg are more qualified than Trump. Nope. Give me someone who has done something outside of government. Give someone who has done something in the private sector. Someone who has paid more in taxes than they’ve received from the coffers. And not someone who carries a rosary in his breast pocket for theatrics.
Very well said.
Her reason for that was that the other choice was Hillary. For that, she was threatened with party exile.
This is a huge part of the problem with many here some 8 wks. ago they’re “maga” base then actually commenting in support of original leftists for vice president no less. Gabbard, KENNEDY, Carlson the original product of a wealthy blue blood CA family of WASPS/ex CNN/ex Bill Kristol employee at Kristol’s failed and now gone Weekly Standard. How many here read the transcript of Carlson’s testimony during Dominion’s lawsuit cucking of Murdoch’s Fox Nooze – and what Carlson stated about Trump? This is part of the mindset that has produced constant losses against “american” marxists. No doubt Carlson’s assessments exceedingly well founded and better yet articulated and delivered, but is he marketing his brand or America First? More than this and since exiting Fox Nooze he’s bouncing and many times bouncing over the curb inn hiws chosen lane. Trump needs another maybe even worse than Pence to join a very long list of disastrous appointments stabbing him in the back to this very day? This is how far too many “fight” including who and what we vote for. And by the way, anyone thinking through what happens if Trump is convicted of even one (1) of the numerous sham felony counts which after all the BS remains a real possibility. Even if he manages to escape this historically unprecedented lawlessness aka “lawfare” what does the next four years look like let alone if “-R” looses the House by their own hand and abdicated to Hack-Keem Jeffries before 2024 Nov. as their only “accomplishment” out of the 118TH coupled with marxists retaining the senate too and either way “led” by creeps such as who… John GQ Thune alt some other McConnell-Daine acolyte? Seems to me this is the McCarthy-Johnson plan to begin with. THESE days right now are “the good old days”. The calm before the final storm prepared for by many with their heads up their asses. Me? I plan to win no matter the cost just like men did in the 18TH century.
I find nothing about to disagree with Tulsi.
As a Citizen of Vermont, I emphasize that anyone who has or had endorsed Sanders for ANY post is NOT MAGA!!
I agree , I’ve watched him interview her many times,there is a personal warmth to the conversations,I usually say to the screen ”get a room”.OK they like each other .
Trump needs people who have always been MAGA,by any other name.I was always MAGA,for the past 60 years,I didn’t rebrand myself to present myself to whoever has momentum hoping to get on the team.
Jesus himself warned us about deception and those who deceive. Tulsi is pure deception. Her little story about the poor farm workers who embraced the democrats because THEY were for the people is a crock of crap. The democratic party was the party that took the United States into a civil war because they wanted to retain their slaves. The democratic party tried to stop the freed slaves from voting and it is the democratic party that is presently destroying America. Nothing has changed with the Democrats nor will it, they are and always have been the party of destruction. The fact that she didn’t figure that out until she was 40 says all I need to know…she’s stupid or a liar. I’ll take liar for 1000!
She’s the snake in the poem President Trump tells so well. Please don’t take her in President Trump. She’s deceitful.
She was talking about Hawaii, not Mississippi, and she was right.
Give her the United States Secretary of State position to streamline that for real peace and neutralize the war hawks and instigators.
If she does wrong then just fire her.
Tulsi Gabbard would undermine President Trump at every move, especially foreign policy.
Ya know, plants, when you grow them from a seed, sometimes make it and sometimes don’t. If you see they’re not growing well, you replant them, hoping the new dirt will give them new life. But people have a tendency to overwater them.
Why would President Trump pick a Democrat? Good Grief Tucker!!!
I agree!
Look at Tulsi’s voting record while in Congress, she voted with Nancy Pelosi 90% of the time. She is not a conservative. .
Love her voice. Deep and smooth.
You must love Donna Brazil and Jessica Rabbit. 🤣
nah…she’s cool
Tucker wants viewers and he wants buzz. He got both. Look at all your rants. He could care less who PDJT selected long as he gets an interview and the buzz
I just want to win, that’s all. I see Alabama flipping 20 points towards a dem in special election yesterday over some woman’s issue and I don’t care if Tulsi is whack on some issues, she is presidential, she is decisive and she would bring home many of the RFK votes we need. Sundance/outside needs to reflect on what it’s going to take to win, it isn’t 2016. We are in a fight for our lives – if trump picks Tulsi I would not be surprised. I don’t like her positions on many issues but she seems persuadable. We just need to assure nothing happens to trump. Without 4 more years of trump this country is finished. Wake up and stop pouting. She ain’t bad on many of the key issues, ain’t bad in this climate? If that’s all we can get, maybe …only Nixon could go to china. Maybe only tulsi can unite us
Conservative voters took the day off in Alabama. Why is that?
If anyone from Alabama has insight, please share. What in the world happened?
“Look, A MULE WITH NO HEAD!”……..Sundance fell for another of Trump`a feints. When TRUMP speaks, STFU AND LISTEN. TRUMP=SIGNAL, all else is noise. The VP will be someone who knows where the bodies are buried.
Nice try Tucker but definitely NO
I HOPE Trump’s VP is someone who is not a politician but someone who is honestly MAGA. Someone who can be brought up to speed on all things Swamp.
I like Tulsi for VP. Trump Jr. also interviewed her on his show. He seemed very impressed with Tulsi.
That’s as good a data point as one can hope to find on her…..I’ll have to listen to his pod…..
But Steven Miller is still on top of my short list….Then Navarro and finally Stefonek….
But it IS complicated…..
I don’t understand the fascination with Gabbard. She is still left of center on most issues, even if some of her foreign policy ideas are good. Besides, Trump needs to pick someone with the fortitude to carry the America First/MAGA banner after his second term is done. Otherwise, we’re right back to square one. Or three, maybe.
I will not vote for a ticket with this woman on it, even if it’s Trump’s ticket. Se needs to put her uniform on and publicly apologize for calling her Commander-in-Chief, a pimp. She made this claim in uniform, to the press, publicly, in 2020.
WEF Young Global Leader.
Hard N0.
An antigun democrat with an appealing demographic from Hawaii? Been there, done that.
Her father ran for State Senate as an R, my guess to avoid the D primary. He was something of a an associate with Rick Reed, one time candidate for US Senate against Inouye. Both seem to have been followers of Chris Butler, something of a “guru” and Hare Krishna advocate. Gabbard won the senate race on a platform of “defend (traditional) marriage” state constitution amendment but once elected immediately switched to D and has since been working his way up the Democrat power structure. Tulsi for her part now identifies as “Hindu”. Tulsi bounced from state Rep to city council to US Rep, TBH I see no reason for her popularity other than charisma.
What qualifications does she have to either be President or help drive the MAGA agenda against certain Deep State dirty tricks? None.
Vance looks good; Vivek is young and questionable but has good ideas; why is it so hard to find suitable people? Why is Trump so bad at picking people?
Tucker’s interview may be performative, but so is the whole Presidency at this point.
Vivek is native born, not natural born, so he isn’t eligible.
Neither is “Never Nikki”, or Heels-Up for that matter.
Wake me up when she actually endorses Trump, MAGA and joins the GOP. Then I’ll pay attention.
Twice before when our Country was deeply divided, a VP from the other party was selected. John Adams chose Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln chose Andrew Johnson. Ot might make good sense to choose someone from the other side. Talsi Gabard is well qualified to be that person.
Adam’s didn’t choose Jefferson. At the time, the dude with the 2nd most E.C. votes was named VP.
If she changed her position on health care and abortion and promised not to run for president in ’28….Id take her over the NY broad or the surgeon with no personality.
Tulsi would be a great face for the “un-woke” the US Military agenda. That’s the only policy assignment I would trust for her to carry out in the MAGA 2.0 Administration. Revolver.news has an excellent article on why JD Vance would be an ideal VP candidate.
You are incredibly kind. My answer is NFW
At 51:30 Tucker says, “The problem with the Consistitution is that the whole document is basically just limits on the power and authority of the politicians… but it’s in the hands of the politicians to uphold”.
I have to disagree… It’s in OUR hands to hold them accountable and to right the ship.
And here we are considering a woman that believes it’s okay to abort a baby…..This is absolutely something I myself cannot compromise on, and that’s final.
It might be unconventional, but I don’t think it’s necessarily a sure thing that the VP pick will be the front runner for 2028. In fact, I can picture Trump endorsing someone else for 2028. The requirements for VP in our current situation are entirely different than our needs for a candidate after 4 years of Trump.
Just listened to the interview and I’m not seeing where Tucker “emphasizes the possibility of Gabbard as a selection for a Donald Trump running mate. In fact, the topic is so frequent within the interview…”. He only brings it up at the end of the interview. Maybe I’m missing your interpretation of the interview (?)
Everything is so clearly contrived, preplanned, all the way to Tucker’s really bad fake “wow!!!” early in the “interview”
She seems to be a female Vivek.
Very very slick.
The issue remains; to find someone the uniparty hates more than PDJT and is fully capable of continuing the MAGA movement against the satanists for decades.
Here’s a little palindrome for all you Tulsi lovers, that pretty well sums up what I think of her:
Tulsi Gabbard, drab bag I slut.