In one of the most disingenuously undefined judicial rulings in recent memory, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan says President Trump may not “target” a member of the court or prosecution in his rebuke of their official offices against him. [3-page pdf HERE]
[SOURCE]
Obviously, Judge Chutkan intends to give herself the most latitude possible when defining what terms of speech may end up being considered “targeting.” However, criticism is not a possible definition in ordinary parlance. So, we’ll see.
Additionally, Chutkan did not outline what -if any- punishment would be levied in the event she considers any statement to be considered “targeting.” The lawfare games continue…
Who are considered “surrogates” (also gagged)?
Well, one day closer to President Trump in jail, a day that will go down in infamy and mucho blog posts by a powerless, in reality, MAGA movement.
You reveal yourself.
Mussolini had power. Adolf had power. The first was hanged upside down, the other took the coward’s path.
Operative word. “had”
Nothing extinguishes power better/faster than reckless power.
Good Luck.
CNN could use your astute prediction. Why don’t you give them a call?
Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, the soyboy way of fighting and you definitely have a black belt in Blah! 😆
Tanya Chutkan and Jack Smith
Henceforth Tanya The Terrible and Crooked And Deranged.
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
They certainly have those Alinsky rules down to a tee.
Most especially, “Always accuse others of what you yourself are doing.”.
2016 Russia hoax in which Hilary was directly dealing with Russians, impeachment hoax number one in which FJB was directly involved with a multitude of crimes.
I’m applying that Alinsky rule to them. Brand them and hype the brand.
Word on the street is the judge converted to Islam on a recent vacation in Iran.
She is a Chutkan Shiite judge.
I disagree.
Pick a Communist or Politician ( they’re ALL guilty) .
Sight in.
Make it personal.
Exterminate that target and don’t be concerned that that person will spend Eternity burning in Hell.
Alinsky RULES APPLY at all times even though they BREAK codes of conduct, rule of law, the Constitution and common sense. Biden and Garland and Chutkan are attempting to OVERTHROW our elections and Constitution. The CRIMINAL judicial system has become a corrupt mess of ROGUE judges who DO NOT UPHOLD the Constitution. There must be laws to DISBARR and REMOVE them. America is on the brink of communism by the JUDICIARY!
As there doesn’t seem to be a clear definition for ‘chutkan’
….let’s go with ‘errant droppings’
Sounds similar to “chunder;” Aussie slang for “drunken vomiting.”
Commie Chutzpah.
Judge Shitcan.
Definition Rhymes with chitcan.
Judges and the judicial branch are required in the article 6 of the constitution to be the guardians of the constitution. Yet we have a whole judicial branch full of judges who disregard our written constitution, leaving us with their unconstitutional interpretations.
Nuremberg 2.0
Not worried yet.. This is chess, no checkers. Lots of pieces still on the board.
In the end it’s all the same. They seek to wipe out the true meaning of their transgressions. Historically they know they can manipulate every aspect of this legal language to benefit their goals. But that doesn’t dictate the course of history.
What you see is semantics.. Nothing more. Maintain course.
Where is a Clintonizer when you need one??
“Trump filed appeal of Chutkan’s gag order”…
Just as the public (ie MAGA) was able to define DeSantis so as to indicate his true ambitions and lack of credibility, so can the public (ie MAGA) publicize the Lawfare regarding Chutkan and this ruling. We are not part of this ridiculous judicial ruling. We are not gagged.
An ugly communist like useful idiot. An ape playing with matches atop a petrol dump.
Paraphrasing clown Chitkan; Orange man bad, I will not allow him to send ‘mean tweets’.
Who will rid us of this troublesome judge?
And what IS a public statement actually? “Addressing” the Public, speaking TO the public? What about speaking privately to someone, like his wife or family IN a public place like a restaurant but others hear, like a reporter who reports the scoop? What about leaks of private conversations not DIRECTED by President Trump? Is “IN” public the same as “TO” public?
I’ll be a “surrogate.”
Chutkan has higher aspirations. This order is just part of the game. Sanctioning or jailing someone for allegedly violating such a vague order would be vulnerable on appeal. Agreed, more lawfare, something about which the MSM can blow their biased horns.
I guess I am a surrogate because I have referred to Chutkan as a stupid Marxist foreigner who needs to be sent back to the craphole Country she came from! I just referred to Smith as a simple LOSER which is what he is!!!🫢
Chuckles the Clown Judge is just following orders. I’d say start the investigation for removal from the bench and subpeona all her email, phone and text records as well. Let’s see who’s giving her instructions.
What does the order say about leaks? Those anonymous sources that leak more than an adult diaper.
Chutkan is a MENACE to SOCIETY, the judicial system and rule of law. Remove this TYRANT from the bench and DISBARR HER! Biden and Garland and Chutkan are attempting to OVERTHROW our elections and Constitution. The CRIMINAL judicial system has become a corrupt mess of ROGUE judges who DO NOT UPHOLD the Constitution. There must be laws to DISBARR and REMOVE them. America is on the brink of communism by the JUDICIARY!
There must be some way in the legal system to reign in these obviously biased Obama judges.
Read a great line of Jonathan Turley’s yesterday. Back in August he observed that “if you take a red pen to all of the material presumptively protected by the First Amendment, you can reduce much of the indictment to haiku.”
It’s time for Judge Chutkan’s judicial supervisor to have a word with her about recusal. She has screwed the pooch royally.
The smugness of people like UpChuktan is revealing! The narrative she and her cronies espouse is in total opposition to faith in God, His justice and mercy and His plan for our fallen world. Instead, she and our world’s leaders believe in their power and control, not God’s.
PLEASE, someone find out Chutkan’s LSAT score! I gotta know