That’s BILLION, with a “B”. According to recently revealed court transcripts, in the US Virgin Islands lawsuit against JPMorgan, in the aftermath of Epstein’s death the massive bank reported over $1 billion in suspicious activity reports to the U.S. Treasury.
Attorney for USVA, Mimi Liu, outlined details to Judge Jed Rakoff in U.S. District Court in Manhattan last Thursday. According to the astonishing revelations, the entire financial relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and JPMorgan was centered around payments for sex trafficking. There was no other business between the two entities in the 16 years of Epstein’s use of the bank. All of the Epstein account transactions were based around his sex trafficking operation.
Additionally, in the aftermath of Epstein’s death, JPMorgan then reported at least $1 billion worth of transactions under the auspices of “suspicious activity.” This certainly looks like what lawyer Mimi Liu called in court, “covering their ass.”
[VIA CNBC] – JPMorgan Chase notified the Treasury Department of more than $1 billion in transactions related to “human trafficking” by Jeffrey Epstein dating back 16 years after the notorious sex predator killed himself in 2019, a lawyer for the U.S. Virgin Islands told a federal judge at a hearing.
“Epstein’s entire business with JPMorgan and JPMorgan’s entire business with Epstein was human trafficking,” Mimi Liu, an attorney for the Virgin Islands, told Judge Jed Rakoff in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Thursday, according to a transcript reviewed by CNBC.
Liu cited the bank’s notification to the Treasury Department as she argued that Rakoff should issue a summary judgment against JPMorgan.
The huge bank is being sued by the Virgin Islands government for allegedly facilitating sex trafficking by Epstein of young women when he was a JPMorgan customer from 1998 through 2013. (read more)
This certainly puts some semblance of scale to the issues around Epstein and his exploitation of the sex industry to his high profile and powerful clients. The full scale is obviously unknown; however, if JPMorgan is reporting $1 billion in transactions that might be considered risk for them, we can only guess at the amount of the total transaction through the bank.
Keep in mind, JPMorgan already agreed to pay the Epstein Victims $290 million {GO DEEP} to make the victim issues go away. What the hell is the scale of the full banking network if this amount of money is being used to throw a bag over it?
Pulling back to the 30,000-foot view, how the bank was operating certainly does start to make the shadows in the background become more visible. After all, the U.S. government relied on JPMorgan to stabilize the banking sector recently. And, when you overlay the influence of the BIG BANKS on domestic politics, and contrast in parallel with their assistance for corrupt activity like Epstein, suddenly the catchphrase “too big to fail” takes on an entirely new meaning.
Many of us have always said the top of the corrupt pyramid is banks, global financial institutions and multinationals. The activity of the political industry takes place below the power structure of the financial system. The banks control the politicians. The banks control almost everything, and are the benefactors for the DNC, RNC, RGA, etc. etc.
This is the apex circle of influence, where Jeffrey Epstein operated in concert with the banks – who then facilitated his operations and were regulated by Epstein’s clients.
“The attorney, referring to a $9 million block of transfers to women and suspicious withdrawals from Epstein’s accounts at JPMorgan, said it related to “facilitating” more than 20,000 sexual acts, given Epstein’s habit of paying several hundred dollars for each sexual encounter.”
^ Is from the ‘ read more’ link provided by SD. Puzzled as to how all this works.
I am trying to picture these financial transactions from the JPM’s perspective. Do they see a check for 200$ written to a female coming from another bank where she deposited the check? Over and over again?
Also: Weren’t many of these females underage? Did they give the check to their parents to deposit !!! or take it to someone who would give them say, 85% of cash value?
Even small regional banks do money transfers for account holders to/from other banks or branches.
It’s not new or particularly unusual.
You almost sound like you think the girls collected money directly from their “customers”.
No, I didn’t consider the girls collecting from customers. But I hadn’t thought of money xfers from JE’s account. All I am doing is trying to understand the process. To think this was going on and seemingly extensive, it’s very interesting to find out how it worked.
And what makes you think those girls might not collect in some cases?
You defending Epstein and/or JPM?
I think those might be Epstein making payouts to the women.
The client pays Epstein $$$$ then Epstein pays the woman $.
So JP Morgyn has a whole lot of records of small payments being made to a relatively small amount of people.
Thanks dd,
Had to think about your last sentence for awhile. But one girl might work more than once a day, be there for a week and then get one large cash payment on payday.
This is all so … messed.
Like any other high-end prostitution ring. You pay the owner (Jeffrey Epstein, Heidi Fleiss etc …..) a couple thousand dollars. The money then filters down to the “working girls/boys”.
I am inclined to think that the majority of girls did not get paid directly by anyone.
But Jeffrey Epstein was paid.
Not a bad scenario at all..
Now the $64 question…
Who.. would you really, really trust to investigate?
Hercule Poirot …
but he’s been retired since 1975.
/s
Your JP MorGYN spelling perfectly sums up this banking evil.
They don’t write checks. To easy to trace. They dole out cash. Ergo what looks like, reported as, suspicious transactions is probably big cash withdrawals.
Thank you. Parents of the underage girls who hopefully eventually come home likely wonder where they got the money or new clothes etc.
Some of the parents were paid as well.
👀
Sadly, many of these girls had parents who didn’t care where the money came from.
But where did the money come from for him to make withdrawals?
Has the full list of Epstein’s clients ever been published?
The clients.
The clients are making payments to Epstein in some fashion, and then Epstein moves the money through JP Morgan.
Epstein had “modeling agencies” in various locations including Paris and was linked with Les Wexer’s Victoria’s Secret. (Epstein claimed that he got rich managing Wexner’s money. Bears looking at more closely) This is where Epstein found his pool of attractive young girls – especially those from broken homes – promising them fame and fortune as he trafficked them around the world to high profile clients.
I’m sure a lot of the transactions were wired funds from banks known to be money laundering – the kind that the Ukrainian bragged of funneling the $10 million bribes to Joe and Hunter that would “take 10 years” to follow.
My guess is that these girls involved didn’t see much of, if any, the cash that changed hands. They were likely lucky to get out alive.
Plus, I doubt that it was just girls, but possibly boys and very, very young children.
Like our favorite President always says, “These people are sick!”
Thx SS. Glad I asked my Qs. Learning lots.
Vile , it’s like they’ve never heard of Sodom and Gomorrah and the consequences thereof .
Or that they have, and relish the thought of it.
They’ve heard of it. And they laugh at it. Either because they don’t believe it. OR they are laughing in the face of God. Either way, they completely spit in the face of all that is sacred and any lessons that may have been taught by our lord and savior.
They will be living those consequences out for eternity, and that is a long, long time.
I am sure if we look to the early Greeks we will find characters who played the same games being played today.
However, in America these past 60 years we have been changing our educational system from a male perspective to a female perspective where now we live with DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity) which is surely a female construct.
In the Banking world one counts dollars (or whatever currency) for a living, then uses them to create more…it’s really a unit, a symbol, that is transferable for energy (energy is the blood of commerce, etc.) Men run that show while down below the “women” play their games with men, you might call this a major distraction, taking care of the daily duties in living a life.
A return to a male perspective in our education system is gaining traction albeit in very, very small steps, if at all. We may need a “big bang moment” to change this rooted system, I suspect so.
Funny how Taylor Sheridan’s “Special Ops: Lioness” tv series presents such a situation in one facet of energy and power. We sense this game, only we must learn how to counter those elements that hinder our lives. It begins with understanding what Plato called “Right Education” if memory serves me.
“DIE . . . is surely a female construct.” Ehhh . . . WHAT?
No, it’s merely a stupid construct–one which was created and is pushed by just as many males as females!
What makes you so sure? Perhaps viewing that Burning Man episode (YouTube) where protesters blocked the entry road might alter your thoughts; watch the longer version and pay close attention to the actors and of course the actresses…go deep in your analysis, really deep such as primal deep.
I HAVE gone deep–as deep as you can go, which is back to the One True God. He didn’t blame one sex over the other. Rather, He said that ALL have rejected Him, ALL have turned away from Him, and ALL have gone their own way.
It’s a not a “primal” problem–it’s a SIN problem.
It took Satan himself to fool the woman … it only took a woman to fool the man.
I can certainly relate to your perspective and belief: No one is without sin. I did not blame a gender, I merely stated that they (2 genders, if you will) are different.
Like Peter Fonda stated in the movie 3:10 to Yuma, a belief system is all he needed which sounds a lot like what you presented. That was not my approach.
Citation from fiction/popular media is not deeply persuasive. Your idea of “going deep” to find meaning/cause and effect is shallow, conventional wisdom; as is your fixation on the “male vs. female,” narrow, popular culture perspective on political/societal constructs.
Nice try, but I don’t see in my post any mention of “male vs. female” which you seem to be fixated on, plus I offered that tv show as an example of different cultures, etc. where oil is the driving force, but perhaps you have some troubles listening to the dialogue with an integrated level of comprehension. Fear not, for there are eight episodes (so far) from which you just might get a different perspective.
From Ghostbusters we have the following quote. When you read it, imagine if good/bad was changed to male/female. Given today’s society that should be quite easy to imagine. The second quote is from later in the script.
Dr. Egon Spengler: There’s something very important I forgot to tell you.
Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
Dr. Egon Spengler: Don’t cross the streams.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
Dr. Peter Venkman: I’m a little fuzzy on the whole “good/bad” thing here. What do you mean, “bad”?
Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
Dr. Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal!
Dr. Peter Venkman: That’s bad. Okay. All right, important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.
Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, “biblical”?
Dr. Raymond Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath-of-God type stuff. Fire and brimstone coming down from the sky! Rivers and seas boiling!
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes…
Winston Zeddmore: The dead rising from the grave!
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together – MASS HYSTERIA!
Mayor: Enough! I get the point! And what if you’re wrong?
Dr. Peter Venkman: If we’re wrong, then nothing happens. We’ll go to jail. Peacefully. Quietly. We’ll enjoy it. But if we’re right, and we can stop this thing… Lenny… you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.
Whether it’s male or female someone needs to save the lives of millions of registered voters.
Good God it’s a Bolshevik concept.
^^^^^^
Every institution in Western Civilization has been feminized. And here we are.
Isaiah chapter 3
when I see Jamie, my perv radar goes to eleventy
When I see Jamie I remember his presidential cufflinks. That, and Epstein’s painting of Bill in a blue dress. This was a blackmail operation at the highest levels of government.
Higher than government. The paper printers themselves
Okay, should have said a blackmail operation ON the highest levels of government.
Jamie, for years the only billionaire banker.
JAAAMEEE,
WHACHA GONNA DOOO???
I totally agree with Sundance concerns about the role of big banks And yet I am a capitalist ! and therefore also want the public —-including criminals such as Epstein —-to be able to process banking transactions with assurance of privacy. Banks are required to report “suspicious activity” because of provisions in the patriot act which limited our freedoms. And I do not like the patriot act constraints on our freedoms! This is a complicated issue because I do not like the banks or the government deciding what banking transactions are “suspicious”
Banking should be a regulated public utility, like power amd water.
Exactly my point! Thank you
You forgot “sewer.”
Hmmm, imagine a conversation w/the DMV clerk about how you’re going to buy a house or a car
Banks should be treated as objective intermediaries who process money only—without being accused of colluding with criminals who are ordering illegal transactions. This case raises fundamental questions about the role of banks beyond simply technical processors of money. I do not want banks to supervise the purpose or direction of money flows
In my opinion Jp Morgan should not be liable if its clients are criminals
If they know their clients are criminals, then they are aiding and abetting. Then again, JP MORGAN CHASE is not on the side of the angels (the good ones). My guess is that most folks don’t know that the Municipal Federal Reserve Corporation was bankrupted and as a result Chase Manhattan Bank now owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE” and JP Morgan owns the name “FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS”. So, how do you feel about them now?
fedshelfcorp.pdf (annavonreitz.com)
The banks are supposed to be objective technical intermediaries between savers and borrowers. They should not be accused of aiding and abetting.
I agree with the above suggestion that banks should be treated like public utilities. This is how the banking system was originally conceived in law, and this is where we need to go back to. The govt and courts should hold Epstein liable but not J.P. Morgan in my opinion.
The federal reserve board should not be influenced or owned by J.P. Morgan ; they are supposed to independently supervise J.P. Morgan. I think Your disclosure of J.P. Morgan connections with the fed reserve , if true, discloses a problem that needs to be fixed ASAP.
You defending banks and JPM also?
Have you considered that bank employees are often directly involved in money laundering for ‘fees’ and knowingly accept monies criminally obtained and are therefore accessories?
.
I’m not sure that I want nincompoops in banks charged with making determinations about whether the funds they handle are from criminals. It’s a slippery slope. Accessories to crimes can be investigated if/when there is probable cause. I’m tired of my banks giving me the stinkeye if I deposit a little bit of cash. It’s obnoxious. Next will they be interrogating me on where and from whom I got the cash?
.
Agree
Those bank employees should be personally liable in my opinion ; they have fiduciary responsibilities they cannot violate
It depends if the bank had a special fee for these transactions. We are talking mucho dinero.
Jamie was the only billionaire banker for many years.
“…should be treated..”
Convenient, so they can participate in the profits from criminal enterprises with no consequences.
Pray tell, do you work for a bank or PR firm representing their interests?
No they should not participate in profits from criminal enterprises. They should process money as instructed by their clients and guaranty the privacy of their clients. That is what the law said, until the patriot act was enacted giving banks the right to flag “suspicious “ transactions. Yup I worked for large banks for 30 years, before the patriot act, and we operated under these assumptions , that our clients’ transactions were private and none of our business. We were not accused of aiding and abetting. If the courts then forced us to provide information then we would do it, but we were not considered liable for clients’ wrongdoing
I think his point is, if you start letting some one at a bank determine your transaction is suspicious, imagine what they will do when their overlords tell them to start flagging all conservative related transactions as suspicious. Cut off all flow to PDJT due to him being labeled a terrorist or insurrectionist.
At the same time, I see your point as well. Which is why someone above posted that this was a tricky situation.
The point is these others don’t want any oversight into “suspicious” activity.
The banks are not responsible for the criminals but are supposed to forward “suspicious” activity to those who can address and DID NOT!
At that point, they become aiders and abetters.
Correct. Based on the law they did not abide by the rule of law so you are correct. Which is why I said what I said how I see both points.
What others are suggesting IS, take that law out of it, some would rather not allow the banks to DECIDE what is suspicious and what isNOT. It puts power in regular peoples hands. And if they don’t like you, they can report you and then your life becomes very complicated.
That is their point.
Agreed.
Either the laws and rules are enforced equally on everybody, or they should be enforced on nobody.
If banking transactions are private for scum like Epstein, then they should be private for me.
If the swamp wants to know where I got the cash in my account under harsh penalties for reporting honestly, then it shouldn’t take 16 years for them to act against Epstein.
AND THE BANK THAT SHOULD HAVE REPORTED IT FROM THE START!
If BLM and trannies can protest over lack of woke policies, I should be able to do the same peacefully and anywhere I choose without threat of having an FBI SWAT team destroy my house while shooting anything that wiggles within it in a 6am raid.
Or I should be able to speak against porn being delivered to kids in schools without being arrested by the local LE.
This dual standard of ignoring the law in some instances (example, sex trafficking) while harshly punishing others (parading in a Capitol) is why we are in the situation we are in now in this country, and it is picking up speed everywhere.
I am not upset with your comment, but am getting DAMN DISGUSTED with those who we put into public office just ignoring everything that is going on.
It is falling on individuals to stand up to this nonsense, and it is a serious risk over whether that individual is then targeted for destruction, simply because those in elected office are too gutless to say, THIS IS WRONG!
You need to be careful here. If you start holding banks liable for what their clients do, then where do you draw the line? It is a slippery slope. Coutts said it was just protecting its reputation when it de-banked Nigel Farage for reprehensible views. In their eyes a climate change denier is a bad as holocaust denier, someone out to destroy the planet. Under that criteria, as bad for the planet, Farage was de-banked. Then do you just reserve de-banking for the “big guys” or apply it to smaller fish, a father who violates state law and refuses to support transitioning his daughter. What about the security firm who installed Epstein’s cameras, the camera manufacture for shipping product to Epstein’s house and the electric company who knowingly supplied electricity to the house, thus enabling Epstein’s crimes? The cellphone provider and ISP could have easily monitored Epstein’s calls, but didn’t. Cutting Epstein’s data and cell plans would have put an end to all of Epstein’s activities. He was a known pedophile after his first arrest.
All of these things can be addressed by two simple solutions, a retail CBDC and a Social Credit Score. They are hoping that they won’t have to apply these things from the top down but that we beg for them from the bottom up. So, be careful what you hope for:
Jamie Dimon may be a despicable character, but be careful about sawing off the branch you are also sitting on.
A Man for All Seasons – The Devil Speech
Screw digital currency. It is slavery, worse than the debt based system we have now.
Classic speech on the Rule of Law. And your point is generally true.
But not in this case. Dimon is a gangster and JPM were essentially partners with Epstein.
I want freedom to do my banking transactions without worrying that a bank will violate my right to privacy. My point is that banks should not be able to decide what is suspicious.
And therefore banks should not be liable if their clients are crooks. And I love the excellent comment above, taking the slippery slope reasoning to the electric company and camera manufacturer and de-banking of Farage for his views.
My conclusion is banks should be treated like utilities , objectively processing transactions without any judgment as to crookedness of their clients.
I want freedom and privacy for all bank clients unless and until the courts find the clients guilty. Banks should not decide what is suspicious. Patriot act opened can of worms by giving banks this power.
J.P. Morgan should be exonerated, free of charges, only required by courts to provide info after epstein found guilty. Epstein should be prosecuted. And any bank employees involved in hanky panky should be personally liable.
“Killed himself”. Yeah, sure, and pigs fly.
Barr is another one who should be dealt with. Also his bushy bosses.
Anybody check out who appointed Judge Jed Rakoff of U.S. District Court in Manhattan? Well, what do you know it was Billy Clinton. Hmmm, I wonder how he will decide on this case? Any guesses?
What case?
I’m sure it’ll evaporate like all the other investigations.
Looking up “Mimi Liu” makes me seriously wondering who she is connected to. She works in a firm full of shysters in DC and she is obviously of Chinese descent.
We all know Jeffery Epstein was a slime ball connected to many around the world but are we to expect this news from the trial in the Virgin Islands is gonna do anything or go anywhere ?
I believe O/Biden had the previous prosecutor fired.
Like Burisma.
Yes. I remember that and one could tie it to something detrementle to JB or hunter, can’t remember.
Can’t wait to see this on NBC, CBS etc.
You’ll have to wait a long time!
So Epstein had a billion or so, looking at some serious time but with some influential friends that could spring him eventually.
Doesn’t sound like a guy that would suicide himself. Sounds like a alphabet agency decided not to renew his contract.
What is done in the dark will be brought into the light. Truth.
Sundance, I highly recommend you read this essay by Burning Bright.
https://burningbright.substack.com/p/the-darkest-path
Their pyramid is constructed on the bones of children. The blood of children, its mortar.
Remember, “we caught them all.”
” Those who know (good) cannot sleep. ”
John of God -> Oprah
Harvey’s Weinstein -> Oprah
Bill Clinton – > Oprah
And she is just one.
Her time, and revelations about Haiti, now approach.
Put on the full armor of God fellow Treepers. The depths of the evil to be revealed will shake the world.
Pray.
People have no clue how vile these people are.
What other banks did Epstein use?
Blood banks 🙂
And what universities did he do his transhumanism experiments with? Think big and there are your banks.
If the banks control politicians, then it’s safe to assume that they’re all on the take in some form. They have a formula for every person, whether it be gold, women, shame, or the safety of their families. This control recipe has been around since Babylon at the latest.
And if the FBI were to use a person like Patrick Byrne to infect the bank with a FISA warrant just think of the leverage they would have.
The inside trader information is just a side benefit.
A billion seems like a lot but illicit laundering is into the trillions.
JP Morgan, HSBC, Deutche Bank, Bank of New York, Standard Charted Bank, Wachovia (now part of Wells Fargo) have all had documented ties that include cartels, drugs, human trafficking, terrorists and corrupt regimes.
For the big banks fines are a pittance, no one goes to jail.
https://news.bitcoin.com/5-major-banks-exposed-for-moving-trillions-for-mobsters-onecoin-and-drug-cartels/
Not when you look at how Epstein lived. He has houses and islands and planes and…
That’s the problem! People need to see some SERIOUS jail time, and not just, “tellers”, but the top of the heap!!!
Jail time? Wrong punishment.
I think that The bank employees on the take , who do side deals with the criminals are liable and should be prosecuted. But banks are legally supposed to be only objective processors of the money who guaranty the privacy of their clients
Watch the DVD, “The International” which PRESENTS AS a fictional account of the Worlds 2nd largest bank, engaged in not just $ laundering, but a “one stop shop” that offered illegal arms transfers, intel and logistics and even assasinations for a fee, to Trafficing cartels, terrorist organisations, intel agencies, etc.
Its ONLY if you watch the “extra features” interview with the director, that you learn it is based on a true story, from the 80’s-90’s, of a real bank that was doing exactly as described, and while it WAS eventually shut down, NO ONE went to jail.
Was that the BCCI scandal?
Sounds like it. I knew someone that had one of the major players in it
living across the street from them. In Avondale Estates, Georgia of all places.
You are exactly articulating Sundance’ concerns that the big banks are out of control now. But that is not the way banking is supposed to work.
The original laws still on the books define banks as objective processors of transactions , like utilities, passive intermediaries between savers and borrowers , guaranteeing privacy of their clients’ transactions and not liable if their clients are crooks.
And that original concept is what we should return to , in my opinion. Prosecute the guilty bank employees if they collude with crooks, but not the banks
So who’s running the show now?
This is the same JPMorgan that cancels bank accounts for gun companies and other industries they disagree with politically.
Here’s the reason you get for closing the accounts:
“After careful consideration, we decided to close your accounts because of unexpected activity on this or another Chase account.”
Their lawyers won’t allow them to give specific reasons, which we all know are political.
But unexpected activity from Epstein’s accounts were ok according to them. That is, until he supposedly killed himself and then they decided to report those activities of over $1 billion.
Republicans in Congress will do nothing because they are in on the game as well.
I think You raise yet another thorny issue. Banks are private companies who can decide who they do business with, unless you treat them like utilities doing a service for the public. Just like The private bakery can refuse to bake a cake for a gay marriage. That’s why banks were originally conceived like utilities, as just objective processors of money who guaranty the privacy of all their clients and treat all clients the same. I agree with above commenter who said it is a “slippery slope” to give banks the right to flag transactions they consider “suspicious”
Yes and the bank doesn’t do it, PEOPLE do it, and PEOPLE need to go to jail.
This almost makes Caligula look like a Saint
billion dollars is a lot of happy endings
No.
A billion dollars is a lot of vile endings.
You imagine teenagers and old men, in beds.
The reality is three year old boys with parts cut off, stumbling as they die, and twelve year olds being chased through forests with their Achilles heels cut so they run in vain.
That’s the art work that they pay to have created in open celebration of the reality.
Would you like me to link it here?
Ever looked closely at the art work in Harold Ford’s home? You know, the figure of a naked adult man with a child figure standing in a stool so the head is at the correct heighth?
my point was merely that a billion dollars worth of $110.00 sex acts is many more than just what happened on epstein’s island, or in his villas / mansions
that money was for the sale of kidnapped human beings, who are discarded when they are no longer useful
my friends in the mega-yacht business tell me of yacht stewardesses who told friends of landing ‘great jobs‘ and were never seen or heard from again
Same as the pedo art in Hillary’s fixer’s John Podesta and his brother’s home
We know that the Virgin Islands and lawyer Mimi Liu will not expose anybody. This is just a finger across the icing to get a few hundeds of millions in bribes or settlement. And really, what does Jamie Dimon care. It’s all been worked in to the next financial.
Your mind went exactly where my mind immediately went. This explains why Dimon is the golden boy and too big to fail and why he is the hero of the left. He has dutifully kept their secrets.
It also begs another question. What does Tucker know and when did he know it?
I thought it was an awful random question for him to ask about Epstein in his interview with President Trump. Was he trying to implicate President Trump in a coverup?
Dimon should be personally held to account if he is in on the take or can be shown to have personally colluded with criminals. But—- the role of the bank is to faciliate objectively the intermediation of money flows between savers and borrowers, and guaranty the privacy of clients transactions.
“The bank’s lawyer, Felicia Ellsworth, told Rakoff that the Virgin Islands had presented “not a scintilla” of evidence that JPMorgan violated laws about sex trafficking.
Ellsworth also argued that the Virgin Islands lacked the legal standing to sue the bank.
JPMorgan has said the American territory can only sue to vindicate the rights of residents, and that there is no proof that any of Epstein’s victims were residents of the Virgin Islands.
“There is hotly disputed testimony and evidence,” Ellsworth told Rakoff.”
This idiot lawyer thinks that sex trafficking women/children within the Virgin Islands can only be prosecuted if the women/children being trafficked within the VI ARE RESIDENTS OF THE VI.
Go ahead and bring sex trafficked victims to the islands and you can’t be prosecuted if they are not “residents” of the VI.
there are chase manhattan bank branches in the USVI
they have standing
Not as of 2002 when JPM branches and ATMs were all turned over to FirstBank.
NBC is reporting on this for a reason. The regime wants more control over JPM, the big banks. NBC doesn’t want Epstein’s client list so I am suspicious of their motive.
I think It is up to the courts to require the bank to reveal Epstein client list. But the bank can’t independently reveal Epsteins client list which would be violation of epsteins privacy
cia and fbi oppose election of any individual who hasn’t gotten dirty at epstein’s island.
it’s a prereq. with them.
YUP!!!
Meaning if this cabal is going to be taken down, most likely, one or some of these scum bags will have to be “forgiven” or “absolved” of their disgusting act (s) they preformed in order to get them to flip.
I know that’s going to ruffle some feathers, but if we want to get some of these disgusting pigs to flip on the rest, we need to take away the fear and shame they have from what ever they have been blackmailed for. I’m not suggesting the crime be made legal, I’m saying in just these scumbags instances they will need to be “let go” on the charges they would normally face.
Rats need to be incentivized. That’s the only way I can see. Since we live in a “non-Jack Bower” world in reality. Otherwise I’d say have some special forces guys pull their finger nails and water board them.
Too late. Penalize all involved.
A $billion! That buys a lot of nookie.
This reeks of CIA and Mossad.
1. Blackmail / political control
2. TBTF bank
3. Treasury Primary Dealer
Ghislaine’s father was definitely [email protected].
Given the very frequent visits to the NY house by Ehud Barak, former PM, former head military intel, I’d bet the ring is run by Aman not Mossad.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/victor-davis-hanson-what-left-did-our-country
No one would honestly give him that kind of money. He was/is an intel asset
This seems like lot of money for prostitution, even if it is with underaage minors. How many super wealthy old perverts are there out there who would pay that kind of money to indulge their adolescent sex fantasies? Even if he was blackmailing them, an extremely dangerous activity. Those same perverts could also afford to pay to take him out and find another supplier. Based on the amount of money involved this looks suspiciously like a cover operation for something even bigger and more dark. Maybe this was a sideline business run as a fringe benefit for people involved in a far bigger and more profitable money laundering business or dangerous international conspiracy. I am beginning to think he was taken out to be sure he didn’t talk about other things rather than who used his prostitution services.
My guess is that the sex with minors was relatively cheap as was the flight to Epstein Island.
The real money was in the Blackmail of those who partook in the festivities.
Could the real money have been from bankers to Blackmail world politicians? The shareholders cannot rein in one with no bridle and bit.
That’s why they fear President Trump.
As Sundance says “there are trillions at stake”
Good point. Blackmail? Prostitution? Sex Trafficking?
Maybe he collected 2-300 million from that over the years, or there would be cartels set up doing the same thing. Maybe he parlayed what he collected into various investments, but doubtful.
Roughly $62,000,000 every year for 16 years?
What other illicit business might be in that monetary range?
Arms trafficking? Drug running? Handling the financing of drug proceeds for 3 letter agencies? Organ trafficking? Political grift laundering? Three letter agency laundering?
Sex Trafficking and blackmail is likely a snowflake on the iceberg.
I suspect Epstein was passing funds from a lof those activities to some very heavy hitters.
Harvesting of organs and hormones, for these vile elitists who believe they may live forever if they consume choice biologicals.
A billion in transactions and 16 years to report it, and????
Meanwhile, the swamp wants to know if I have $600 in my account and where it came from.
Yup.
Bank has no right to ask you about your $600 unless the courts determine you did something illegal with the money and court requires the bank to disclose that
So we don’t need epstein’s client list….
just open up epstein’s JPMorgan bank records….
Skin that cat….!!!!
BTW….epstein didn’t kill himself.
Our, “history” books need to be revised I think.
Extortion for his pervert clienteles?
If I’m not mistaken, JP Morgan handles all the food stamp money. I think that happened under Obama’s reign.
Correct.
J.P. Morgan is the governments bank ; they have all the embassy accounts etc. —the government has to keep its money in a bank. That’s where it gets messy if the government also supervises the bank and gets its conflicting roles mixed up
I see a terrible ignorance as I look through the comments.
Perhaps, Sundance, it is time to reveal more truth.
Your call, Ad Rem.
If it gets deleted, I will defer and stop.
Yet, if not here, then where? If not now, then when?
You don’t even have to read, just scroll down for the pictures.
https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/balenciaga-is-pizzagate
Why $1 billion?
It wasn’t for sex with 14 year olds. At least not primarily. That was surface level.
Same.
https://lizcrokin.substack.com/p/pizzagate-exposed-part-2?r=17d7ph&utm_medium=ios
One of the Podesta brothers’ favorite artists.
https://www.katzfreiman.com/exhibitions/biljana-durdevic-paintings/
She sure does love painting kids who have been tied up, or wear red shoes, or are hung by their arms in a Vanderbilt swimming pool.
Are we getting the real picture folks?
85,000 plus kids went across our Southern Border, were released to the tender mercies of whoever wanted them, and now they are all missing.
How many of them ended up in a Getty, or Anderson Cooper, or Kevin Spacey, or similar basement? Or a hospital surgery suite?
You don’t want to imagine it?
Here is a truth. Demons exist. People who don’t worship God end up worshipping demons. From the Bible to human history to Game of Thrones to Michelle West’s books to Robert Jordan books to many, many others, the Jungian archetypes and historical texts all tell us what demons desire: Human sacrifice. The younger, the more torture involved, the better, as far as demons are concerned. From the Aztecs to the Phoenicians to Giles de Raies to the Dutroux affair, do not imagine that modernity, especially with its accelerating turn towards paganism, changed its path.
It didn’t. The globalist elite gets jumped in, at every level. When John Podesta goes on summer vacation to the site of the Donner party, and brags about it to Politico, and his brother installs a hanging statue of a Jeffrey Dahmer victim in his front hall and calls it “art”, we are back to pre-Christian morality, with powers and principalities in control of all of the mechanisms of power.
“Who built the cages, Joe?”
Joe and Frank and Jimmy built the cages, they got their contracts, and they got their 10 percent cut, and Joe, at least, almost certainly got his selections of the merchandise.
I agree some naivete here, and ignorance on the bottomless nature of evil.
Just how much do you think it costs, for an order of “babyback” ribs,…hmm?
They ain’t cheap, thats for sure.
A lot. Research adrenochrome. The prices charged and where it comes from.
Alex is not wrong.
I think that many of us are merely commenting on the lawsuit between the Virgin Islands and JP Morgan. I guess that we can expand the topic to the demonic forces in our world who see children as body parts.
Yes it’s really that bad, they are really this sick, & people have no clue.
We are aware. That was revealed here a long time ago. We know about the podestas and their preferred artwork too. Disgusting then and even more disgusting now. But what were we to do with the knowledge? God will have to deal with these people and I’m convinced that HE will.
I read this…although it was extremely difficult to observe such evil.
Hillary’s message to Huma – “be sure to bring my inhaler, you know how excited I get on sacrifice night”.
Who or what was being sacrificed???? IMO Hillary belongs to Satan.
Let’s see what you have.
Scroll down to the second pinned Gab.
Open Your Eyes.
https://gab.com/MorpheusMAGA
The real reason they want you to hate Donald Trump:
https://gab.com/OriginalWhiteHorse/posts/110586617932453921/media/1
And the FBI can’t find who paid for all of this sex with children. It’s time for the FBI to be unplugged.
Epstein visited Bill Clinton’s White House more than 15 times from 1991 to 1993 and he took more than 26 trips on the “Lolita Express” including long trips to Asia and Africa.
Several of Bill’s trips were unaccompanied by the Secret Service.
That Epstein was able to operate for so long tells you how high up in the government knowledge of his sex trafficking went – and how the spy agencies have been able to operate with impunity.
Seems that Hunter Biden saw trafficking women as a great way to do favors for powerful people and make a lot of money at the same time. How much taxpayer money was/is diverted to pay for the politicians playthings?
Thinking about you, Lindsey.
Maybe the people paying for the congressional slushfund, should put in a FOIA request.
CIA was in on it. If Epstein got comprising pictures of politicians, the CIA would use that to get what they want and Epstein also got what he wanted in hush money. Don’t know if Epstein had a stable of boys for Lindsey.
He had a stable for Kevin Spacey, why not Lindsey.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/todays-blind-items-island.html?m=1
And Mossad.
“Here’s ten bucks for a happy ending.” -Jamie Dimon to Lehman’s Bart McDade.
To answer the question probably 10B knowing Jamie and Morgan.
When
will the client’s names;
those who paid for ‘services’,
be made known?
-It must be a loooooong list
Sundance what do we do? I am not an old mule. I’m a single parent without much more than the fire of my convictions and a desire to put a stop to the evil being done in the name of America.
How do we stop this? How do we save our country? Is it even possible anymore to do both?
1) Don’t vote for any democrat for any office at any level.
2) In primaries vote against establishment RINO’s.
3) Encourage your friends and relatives to vote against democrats and call out corruption and evil whenever they see it.
4) Be the best parent you can to your kids. Teach them morales and responsibility try to make them better than you are.
5) Be active in your kid’s school and call out liberal indoctrination when ever you see it.
6) Study history and read up on current affairs. You will be amazed at how often history repeats itself.
7) Pray for divine intervention to save our country and pray we can stop them with the ballot box.
8) If after all that you happen to have a free hour or two during the election year, you might consider helping out as a Republican campaign worker.
a billion? cia ops & laundering. epsteined politico better than a fresh idealist.
All roads lead to Oz. While the wicked witch’s husband monkeyed around, the munchkins danced and sang the songs of money, the wizard hid behind the curtain while dealing in children. Wonder where all those children were sent that came here illegally often alone and unprotected?
Billions for boinking, but not one cent for tribute!
Just so I get this straight…
Epstein had a stable of girls who he made available…for sexual favors…to his friends?
A person or persons (identities currently unknown) made deposits in Epstein’s account at JPM to fund payments to the girls in respect of these favors?
Epstein used these deposits to pay the girls?
All to the tune of $1 Billion?
Yes only the courts could determine what is criminal, not the banks
.
Keep talking. Too many smart people here seem to go off the counterproductive edge because the issue they perceive is child trafficking, or the synapses are misfiring because “sex”.
It’s like the leftists saying that the First Amendment shouldn’t apply if it’s the wrong kind of speech.
Banks have absolutely no business inquiring into where deposits come from or where they go. They have no business asking anything unless it’s a questionnaire to decide whether to give a loan. Their job is to hold money, invest money, pay out the money. They should not be quasi-government agents tattling on people to the government or deciding who should be entitled to have an account. This is VERY dangerous.
.
Amen! Thank you
The continuing lack of investigative curiosity from major media of all typesis no longer mind boggling it’s just the way it is.
Epstein was extorting people. They would pay him 50k a month or 100k a month to not disclose that they slept with a. minor. Pictures or videos would be made public if they did.t pay
It’s a shame there are no legitimate national law enforcement agencies in America.
Sounds like Chase was handling Epstein’s sex business proceeds, and knew it.
”Not that there’s anything wrong with that.”