“Foxweiser’d” – it’s a verb to describe taking a majority approved brand and aligning yourself with minority interests to destroy it. Also called stepping on a rake.
With Fox News reported to have lost half their audience, the trio of MSNBC, CNN and Fox Corp are now neck, neck and neck, in a three-way race to the bottom. Into this financial spiral, which doesn’t seem the least bit worrisome to the board and owners who are more concerned with their multinational financial interests, comes Fox News prepositioning to avoid further downgrading via a Tucker counter offensive.
Axios is reporting that Tucker Carlson is going to launch nuclear tipped verbal SCUDS at Fox News as soon as his tongue is unleashed. However, a note of caution is warranted. Which is more likely: (a) that Carlson is going to expend the energy on an irrelevant media network committed to destroying itself; or (b) that Fox News is leaking information to Axios in a proactive measure to mitigate their fall into irrelevance.
Stop Pretending – Anyone who is still appearing on Fox News to support the network, specifically including anyone who would appear on Sean Hannity show – a man entirely compromised by his zipper problems and therefore useful to the interests of the opposition, is at this point aligning themselves against ‘We The People’. [Insert upcoming tour de’ force of Fox News on behalf of Ron DeSantis here]
AXIOS – Tucker Carlson is preparing to unleash allies to attack Fox News in an effort to bully the network into letting him work for — or start — a right-wing rival, sources close to him tell Axios.
Bryan Freedman, the high-powered Hollywood lawyer Carlson retained for the contract dispute, told Axios: “The idea that anyone is going to silence Tucker and prevent him from speaking to his audience is beyond preposterous.”
Why it matters: Tucker vs. Fox could reshape the conservative news world. Fox, which has seen its ratings plunge in Carlson’s slot since he was let go 13 days ago, wants to sideline him by paying him $20 million a year not to work.
The intrigue: Axios has learned Carlson is busy plotting a media empire of his own. But he needs Fox to let him out of his contract, which expires in January 2025 — after the presidential election.
We’re told Carlson has been contacted by outlets — including the right-wing Rumble and Newsmax — that offered to pay him more than his Fox contract.
Behind the scenes: Axios has learned that Carlson and Elon Musk had a conversation about working together, but didn’t discuss specifics.
Carlson confidants say he also is contemplating building a direct-to-consumer media outlet where his millions of fans could pay to watch him. Carlson’s predecessor in his Fox slot, Bill O’Reilly, created a blueprint for this.
Two days after being booted, Carlson teased in a Twitter video posted at 8 p.m. ET, counter-programming his former show: “See you soon.” The two-minute video has racked up 24 million views.
State of play: The ousted host “knows where a lot of bodies are buried, and is ready to start drawing a map,” said a Carlson source who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.
Carlson allies with big platforms are prepared to attack Fox for trying to keep him on the shelf.
Bare-knuckle brawlers from Trumpworld are standing by. (read more)
One thing that should be noted – all of Roger Ailes’ former team would be willing to work free of charge to assist Tucker in breaking billionaire Rupert Murdoch if that was the intent. It’s not, because there’s no need to destroy an enemy that is destroying itself.

Fox the Foreign News Service has Mark Levin to scream WAR WAR I need WAR. lol
My two cents: why start from scratch if you don’t have to? With Newsmax all the infrastructure is already there, it’s available on existing cable packages so there is nothing new to find or learn, and I am already recording his time slot on Newsmax just waiting for him to show up and OWN everybody else. He could include in a Newsmax deal the freedom to start a premium outlet for his special reports like on Fox Nation (already canceled), and that is where he could get all high tech. For now, keep it simple.
Took mevless than a week of watching Newsmax to realise it is Faux 2.0.
But then I spotted Fox as controlled op, years before the 2016, election didn’t need 2020 to tell me what I already knew.
Dump Newsmax, they are poisoning your brain slowly.
Try One America News, RSBN, OAN, but NOT Newsmax!
Sure just likexFox did, they will have a FEW “Good people” but if you notice the good ones like Stitchfield and Emerald Robinson LEAVE; thats a clue right there.
RAV is better. Not even close.
Agreed. RAV, One America, RSBN.
I have made the analogy that Fox news is to network news as GOPe is to politics: both purport to be the “conservative alternative” and play TWO vital roles.
On is the “controlled op” role, of coarse.
By Fox news being THE “Conservative brand” no one can raise the $ to start a true rival, one that really WOULD markey to US.
Hence, Fox occupies the SPACR, and defends it against all interlopers.
Same for the RNC, as we have seen with both the Tea party and MAGA, and actually going back to Perot, Buchanan, Goldwater the RNC visciously blocks a true “conservative” party from being able to develop.
IF the space is opened, by the “Conservativr alternative” being exposed as false, so that it loses its “audience” THEN a new entity can groe to fill the space.
And the analogy continues, with Tucker and PDJT.
With both, the evidence has long been right there, that they WERE “controlled op”, and yet for so many, we stuck with them, cause half a loaf of moldy bread, seemed better than starving.
Even after 2020 election nite, many stayed with Fox, and many continued to make the argument here and elsewhere, (Sabrinak, I think her screen name was) that you “vote for your favorite in the primary, but in the general, you vote for the R, cause the D is worse” which was like continueing to watch Fox, cause CNN is worse.
And, I THINK the RNC has to do the equivalent of firing PDJT, (refusing him the nominatation) in order for him and us to finally break free.
IF I am right about that, I believe the R precinct captains across the country, and their volonteers will move as one with PDJT, and at some district or even county levels.
And, he will NEED an army, in place to do a MASSIVE GOTV effort, which will include educating our voters on HOW to vote, rather than the traditional effort of just getting them to vote.
Hence my harping on encouraging ALL to become Precinct Captains or volonteers.
And, if my chrystal ball is cracked, and the RNC actually allows PDJT to be the r nominee,, such work will STILL be vital, to doing everything wr can to try to get PDJT elected in 2024, as the alternative is too horrific to contemplate.
IMHO,..
fka Serena.
Not so serene after all.
Time for Elon and Carlson and O’REILLY and Ingraham and Hannity and Waters and you get the idea to start an all conservative channel just like fox did a while ago. GO TUCKER!
None of the above mentioned are MAGA.
Some people never learn.
Good grief. At least pick MAGA people.
It looks like you want to take us right back where we’ve been with this group.
More like Lou Dobbs, Lara Logan, Trish Regan and Tucker. That is a dream team.
Fox lawyers a few years ago argued in court that the public should not consider the organization as a news source since Fox News is entertainment. Rush mentioned this many times.
I still cannot believe people still watch Fox, or any news channel. Just say no! It is much better without TV. I have not missed it for years. Years!! And it saves money.
Agreed. People got addicted to having news and entertainment prepackaged for them, and served up in their living room every nite.
“Whats on TV, tonite?” was the question. Its like having fast food for dinner every nite. No nutrition, but “filling” and with limited choices.
There IS a whole bunch of media available on the I-net, you just have to WORK for it a little, much like cooking your dinner yourself, its a little work, but FAR more nutricious.
Cable and Satelite is just paying for having 5 different Lucy shows available, yuch!
Never had those, and got rid of the broadcast antenae around 2010.
Have a nice library of over 200 videos and DVD’s, bought from yard sales, thrift stores and used video/dvd sources.
Very low cost, and I get extra satisfaction knowing those libbie barstuds in hollywood get NONE of my $, but I get the entertainment, and I control what I watch, and keep out the propoganda.
Been that way since the 1990s when I would read articles that internet news was just a fad and no one would pay attention to it. Well, my cow computer (Gateway desktop) and my earthlink e-mail address are long gone, but fortunately so is my television as my computer was some how related to Mrs. O’Leary’s and burned it out of existence as a news and entertainment source.
And you also get to think how you think without some overpriced talking head misrepresenting!
I think he will do something “outside the box.” I hope he doesn’t bring along the boring Tulsi Gabbard and I hope he does not make his audience pay to see him. He has plenty of money, doesn’t need to do that.
Tulsi Gabbard, Klaus Schwab gurl, offers nothing of value except her good looks.
Do you think Crenshaw will come out for Tulsi or Schwab?
BOTH!
Will he come out as Tulsi or Schwab? Corrected it.
as Tulsi Schwab. Correct
If Tulsi Gabbard was a ‘Klaus Schwab gurl’ she wouldn’t be out there saying the things she’s saying.
IMHO
agreed
LOTS of people who are “Klaus Schwab” people say all kinds of things to get fame and money!!
If all you need to trust someone is nice “conservative” sounding words, then don’t be surprised when they stab you in the back.
a la Nimrata Haley
Exactly. That’s how we got here – believing what the corrupt traitors say rather than looking at what they actually DO.
Be careful what you type. Going from what you say. Nobody should trust Trump . He was a registered Democrat from 2001-2009.
And graduated from an Ivy League university.
Sure she would, there’s a valuable place in the overall movement for controlled opposition narrative engineers.
Not that I necessarily think Tulsi is one, but that when you’re rigging debate and discourse, you’re of course going to put your own people into the “opposition” roles.
Tulsi speaks more common sense than 99% of the GOPe.
Really low bar.
I thought this was about Tucker?
These discussions go off the rails Tulsi, Noem, Lake !
Tucker doesn’t need a two person format and to speculate I do not get the point.
Tucker’s style is very subtle.
Tucker has gotten away with saying a lot more in the recent past than was “allowed” because of his expressions (see above Tucker expressions) and delivery of concise, quick truth morsels that the viewer can than sort out and or lead them to sometimes profound moments of clarity as to what’s really going on.
Tucker needs no sidekick so why is it being debated?!
Maybe as guests but he’s not even announced his next move.
Christie Noem is a lot cuter, and she’s got the horses, guns and pick-em-up truck thing going on!
She stood on the establishment RNC side – against the grassroots – when the Republicans tried to dismiss the precinct committeemen’s votes.
She’s very much part of the RNC Club. Mike Lindell tried to contact her repeatedly about it, she completely ignored his calls.
http://link.frankspeech.com/q/tOXjja5kcy2V7k-VaIKk8rhOJ7kE2QMMortmH5XcbflNDj9DQ5_vbhJLpF
Never trusted Noem, and never will. She is no Kari Lake.
Agreed. She’s no Kari Lake, but she does make a guy grin.
None of us will ever really know who any of these people are. The primary disguise of a politician is to create a public image that the voters will support. That image almost always has nothing to do with the real personality of the politician, whose actual personality is carefully concealed from the public. Noam, Gabbard, Haley, and others mentioned in these comments are not known well enough for us to have opinions about their personalities.
We should remember that all politicians are liars because we would never vote for them if they revealed their real personalities. How many of us could ever get elected to any political job with all aspects of our personality visible to our voting contemporaries, Tucker and Trump included? It is ugly, but I believe it is the truth.
Noem also had the chance to take on and take out the odious UNIPARTY scumbag Thune and she refused. Watch her show up at DeSanctimonous side shortly. MAGA just not her style.
And if you look at a close up, she ain’t that good looking. Her skin complexion is awful.
Mildly good looks. Clearly not hot conservative women good looks.
I’m surprised how many people still believe this.
I don’t like Dan Crenshaw but I don’t think he ever went or was a part of it either.
There are also people who actually went and no longer support it.
FWIW, she recently claimed that the WEF put her face/name on their “Global Leaders” page without even asking her, and she never had any involvement with them.
Vivek Ramaswamy recently claimed the same thing.
Take that for what you will. Certainly it’s an old marketing trick, to slap a logo or business association on your company profile to give yourself a loftier appearance. Perhaps this is what the WEF is doing. Perhaps not.
Not sure why everyone gets all starry eyed over Skunk Locks.
I could not agree more.
I trust TG not at all.
She is a political weather vane with no core anchoring principles, conservative or not. One moment she sounds wonderful and a reliable conservative ally, then …. I believe a lot of conservatives give her a free pass bc she spent time in military.
She is not in Tucker’s league and does not share his principles or mindset or patriotism or talents.
Tucker would be best served by having no affiliation with her.
Tulsi is no way shape or form a conservative. Just because she has moments of lucidity, much like Bill Maher, make her no friend of ours
Can’t stop remembering that ad TG made for communist and Castro lover Bernie Sanders in 2016. I mean, ‘people so stupid’ to trust this birdbrain.
The male weathervane is Manchin who Fox loves when he “reaches across the aisle”, when he can get something under the table..
He’s running a long con on the West Virginia rubes.
People would rather pay for gossip, then support independent media.
Look at the copy above, reads like a Harlequin Enterprises novel.
The courage to be cheese… a blueprint for Murdoch’s revival?
Harlequin Enterprises is a romance and women’s fiction publisher founded in Winnipeg, Canada, in 1949. From the 1960s, it grew into the largest publisher of romance fiction in the world…in 2014 it was purchased by News Corp and is now a division of Harper Collins.
Would YOU work for free?
Even if he didn’t take a salary as you seem to suggest, it costs millions to pay for staff, equipment, air time/distribution, guest fees employee benefits, etc. What world do you live in???
That’s what makes the free market so appealing – if you’re willing to take a risk, the rewards can be huge.
Already estimated he’ll make $20 million+/ year just doing a regular podcasts.
With his following, it’s a pretty safe bet.
He would bring in a very large advertising income.
Exactly – Mike Lindell to the rescue.
Oh please – he already has millions and millions -not counting what he will make in the future wherever he goes. How many millions does he need? You make it sound as though he is a pauper barely struggling to survive. We the People are the paupers.
tucker carlson is the heir to the swanson foods founder
he will never have money concerns
Working for free is not the American way.
Tucker has earned his advancement a hell of a lot more legitimately than many millionaires.
I can only imagine the security expenses due to all the death threats Tucker gets routinely.
Tucker’s wife was present when Antifa or some other hired idiotic group stormed his DC home.
Well has that happened to any of you, that think Tucker should work for free!.?
Tucker has 4 adult children let’s say he his wife or adult child gets very sick (in the Covid times we live) Tucker would seek out the best medical care I would assume and that would not be cheap.
The medical costs vs. level of care have plummeted and is only getting worse.
It’s very assuming and arrogant to say Tucker should not earn money if he works!
That sounds like socialism to me taking from the haves and giving to the have nots.
Bottom line it’s no one else’s business how much money Tucker has and it certainly is no one’s business to say he should not get to earn anymore.
Heir to Swanson yes, but have you seen the will?!
By the way I am not a pauper but I have never worked for free and very happily took every raise I ever got even though there’s people out there that have less than me.
Levin tried that and it only went so far, I for one would never pay to see either him or Beck. But, that’s just me.
Levin is like nails on a slate blackboard to a lot (most?) people.
If Levin was taken off the air would anyone actually Notice?
Fox not going to destroy themselves no more than Trump drained the swamp. Tucker is good but not good enough. He will be sidelined until 2025 and then it does not matter. He is just part of the script being played to divert your attention from the real problems. Works every time.
I think Tulsi Gabbard is smart, articulate, measured, and a voice of reason. She does not jump at the bait people throw at her. She is confident in her own skin. I always like to listen to her. Often they have her on only for a quick sound “bite” as a token plug for a former Demoncrat. . That is too bad. She has more to offer. As far as Tucker Carlson, I will follow wherever he goes. Once he left Fox, all the prime time hosts looked like they were reading script, not think. Their claim to fame seems to be video clips of other stations, then inane commentary. There is no “thought” there IMHO. That difference has me want to follow where Tucker Carlson goes.
Some say Hannity is a “human intelligence” asset of the FBI. “C’mon man!”, I think to myself. The guy is an over-confident total moron. He’s not an asset, just a horses @ss.
Then it occurs to me: Cristopher Wray
I could totally see the two of them grillin’ it up, each with a ‘tranny juice’ Bud in hand this summer. Both over-confident, self-congratulatory, worse than useless pieces of $#!t.
Yea, maybe there is something to it.
Perhaps he is 1/2 an asset, the first half?
Just drop the “ET” and there you have it.
Q: What’s an asset?
A: A female donkey.
You go Kitty!
It’s the hair duo
For me it was his groveling to Newt Gingrich and Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and all their ilk!
……………………………………………………….
http://historymusings.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/full-text-campaign-buzz-december-15-2011-fox-news-gop-iowa-debate-transcript-republican-presidential-candidates-debate-sioux-city-iowa/
NEWT: ” … I NEVER WORKED WITH PEOPLE I DON’T AGREE WITH…” Dec. 15, 2011 Fox News Debate, responding to Michelle Bachman regarding his conduct re Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
………………………………………………………..
http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/newt-gingrich-is-more-dangerous-to-america-than-obama-and-i-can-prove-it/
by Gary P Jackson | November 28, 2011
Newt Gingrich is More Dangerous To America Than Obama and I Can Prove It!
After Obama was elected, Newt teamed up with race hustler, and all around weasel, Al Sharpton and Education Secretary Arnie Duncan, a Chicago socialist, “In an effort to push cities to fix failing schools and highlight the Obama administration’s programs to reform public education.” Newt said this of Sharpton: “I think he has it exactly right, that education has to be the No. 1 civil rights issue of the 21st century, and I’ve been passionate about reforming education.”
[[[ Newt’s Pac Received in the $Millions for Newt to travel with Arnie Duncan and Al Sharpton for 2 yrs on an Education Tour – I used to have the Amount, but had a few Computer crashes in 2012, and funny thing, Online, where I got it in the first place, isn’t turning up that answer to a Search – They do have the inside scoop on his scandal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, where he was paid a “consulting Fee” for NOT MAKING WAVES for them. Almost $2 Million, in the late 1990’s. ]]]
You can’t educate the
un-educate-able.
How about when he has Bruce Jenner on and rubs up against that fake and phony, delusional head case? Maybe Seanette Hannity will help propel Faux to the bottom.
No doubt in my mind Hannity has crammed himself up the arse of the top spooks.
Sometimes it’s simpler then that. When all you have are political hires, they may or may not be the most competent in selecting or compromising political, “marks”.
Put another way, the intelligence communities’ reputation, far outweighs it’s resume.
Then you have the private intelligence groups, secret money PACs, Oligarch funded NGOs, and PPP lobby groups running parallel political schemes alongside the faux news.(foreign and domestic)
We’re paying for LGBT movie nights in Australia and gender dysphoria psych therapy in Brazil. Axios whines about Tucker like Brandon. Uh-huh.
“Everything is April fool’s day now, everything is the opposite of what it should be.”
— Donald J. Trump April 28, 2023
Being an idiot is the perfect cover
You might have misspelled asshat.
So, then, maybe Anderson Cooper is CIA? Was Anthony Bourdain? It all makes sense then. Reality, for us, is theater.
Hmmm, maybe. The more you learn about Coop, the weirder he seems.
Anderson Cooper is a Vanderbilt and assuredly is full-on Mockingbird Ultra.
Anderson Cooper was on the rowing team at Yale with Wray.
Think he was the one that yelled “stroke! stroke!” at the front of the boat.
Been hearing about Cooper and CIA forever.
Lord please give me the strength to make no further comment on this subject.
That guy’s called the cocks in.
Dana I personally think a vast majority of the media anchors are CIA related. Their job is to create the narrative that the CIA wants the people to believe! How else can so many people say and do the exact same thing all across the board. When was the last time you ever had a large group of people all agree on the same thing? Answer? NEVER. Won’t ever happen! Too many normal people think for themselves.
If you notice, whenever they have these so called “independents” on a town hall these idiots repeat the narratives of the MSM. I can’t watch these people, they seem so unbelievable in their assessments. The one I hate the most is they voted a certain party because of the abortion issue! So they vote on that and watch our country go to the bottom all due to abortion? Oh plaleese!
His FBI lapel pin might be a clue.
Until very recently, Hannity wore a CIA lapel pin during his show. Wonder why he quit wearing it?
Moving on to the next topic. Nothing to say here.
Ohhhh man ! That’s gonna leave a bruise!!!! Boom shaka laka!!!
I think the best option for Tucker Carlson is to create a subscription-based Internet production.
The cable and on-air networks have descended into irrelevance.
If Tucker owns the productions, nobody can kick him off or shut him down.
I would subscribe.
An hour with Tucker is far better than a week of watching the propaganda networks.
gnome, Ever watch NewsMax or One America News Network? If you consider them “cable and on-air networks (that ) have descended into irrelevance.” please tell us why.
Thanks.
SamFox
As an early riser , was used to getting my morning news from Fox and Friends First( not Fox and Friends)
Newsmax is still running infomercials at that time .
They have to step up their game .
NewsMax is as much controlled opposition as FOX ever was. They just don’t have the production values and skirts.
Real Americas Voice is the best. Good in the morning too. They say a prayer everyday.
I saw a news headline recently… or maybe a video clip headline… or both… that said he might just leave the money on the table. January 2025 gives him two years at $20M per… Carlson could EASILY make up the $40M multiple times over with the stroke of a pen. Murdoch can keep his dirty money. And I haven’t heard one thing about non-compete… which, I think, are often successfully challenged in court on the grounds that one “has to put food on the table”. In Carlson’s case… that’s a helluvalotta Spaghetti and Meatballs for the kids.
Love this: “right-wing Rumble”… uh… nnoooooooo…. that would be the FREE-SPEECH ALTERNATIVE to GoogleTube. Freaking Axios… useless.
mr. p, I agree bout asxios. And Rumble.
Try utgtube.com to go with Rumble.
The Utah Gun Exchange site is an an alternative to youtube.
SamFox
Good grief. So much negativity here. Nothing of substance. Why even bother. Meh.
But you bothered!
Only to be negative as well, go figure.
Cant wait to see the peaceful J6 footage playing on a endless loop 24/7
Except he did not get copies of all the footage, just got to “review” it there.
He never IIRC, explained exactly how he got the small bit he did show, of Chanly walking around with a police chaperone.
He used the same footage as his Tucker Carlson special a few months earlier.
watch it on bitchute.
Nope, never did we hear how those segments, once selected and approved, were transferred to his or Fox’s custody.
They initially reviewed in a SCIF, but the players involved in that process weren’t revealed either.
..well it also may happen that he may be LIQUIDATED BY CIA….just like JFK …you think I am crazy ? …OK ..but explain to me why we still have not seen the REAL PRINT OF THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT …. because we are 3rd world country corrupt to the core
😂
Good one.
Mark Groubert recently did an America’s Untold Stories episode on Tucker’s father, Dick Carlson. It was very interesting.
I did not realize that it was Tucker’s dad who outed women’s tennis star Renee Richardson as a tranny. Renee Richardson did not quietly transition and get on with life. He moved across the country and competed in women’s sports at the top tier level. Tucker has been reporting on the same thing a generation later.
Here is the YouTube link but I’ll post the Rumble link below so folks here can avoid YouTube.
https://rumble.com/v2loc0m-who-was-dick-carlson.html
Renée Richards.
Oops. You are correct.
In a way, so were you.
Keep it simple: whatever way enables 1) the maximum number of people to be reached…2) without him having to compromise or curtail the expression of his actual views is the way to go.
I haven’t watched FOXNews since they fired Tucker. Trying to silence Tucker until after the 2024 election makes them more evil than CNN, MSNBC, NPR, WaPo, NYTimes, and all the other Communist yellow journalists combined. It makes me feel sick to my stomach to think about watching them. I turned on Varney on Fox Business once since Tucker was fired to see if they’d gotten to him too. He was praising Biden for a PR message he’d put out that day to call for unity in the country. Click. Won’t be watching that show anymore either. After Biden goes onto national TV and says half the country are domestic terrorists, (because we didn’t vote for him) he wonders why he’s reviled and calls for unity. What a farce. Don’t bother to hold your breath waiting for an apology in the effort for “unity” or even votes. Those days are long gone now that election fraud is down to a science. The Democrat/RINO Crime Syndicate is doubling down with their lies and dreams of globalist tyranny. They’re not going to give any ground to come to the middle for “unity” voluntarily. It’s going to take indictments and prison time. That is the only language of deterrence that criminals speak. Unfortunately they know the dirty DOJ & FIB will do nothing about their criminal activity no matter what they do. Pray Psalm 35 for God’s Justice.
The dirty DOJ & FBI are essential parts of the crime syndicate.
I havent watch Faux since the fired Bill O’Reilly. They showed their true colors back then.
Run with the ball, Tucker!
Lots of us behind you, had quit FOX even though you were on it. Other sites carried clips of your program that were quite enough.
FOX & rest of mind control money-nuts have yet to realize that no one & nothing, can destroy thought.
Fox harmed its “Brand image” the moment they fired Carlson.
I hope that wherever Tucker lands, it is not connected with the likes of Rumble or Elon Musk, or any other ‘controlled opposition’ platform
It won’t be long till corporate “whatever” and government will call it illegal to voice an opinion that would hurt them financially or politically.
Whatever Tucker does I hope it is not a subscription service. I will pay but his words need to be available to everyone. My opinion about why they fired him when they did is because he had back-to-back interviews with PDJT & Elon. I believe his next big interview was going to be with Jacob Chansley about Jan 6th and the horrendous conditions in the DC gulag and all the illegal things the DOJ are doing when it comes to a lack of civil liberties. following the constitution, etc. with the 1/6 prisoners. Tucker showing the 1/6 footage featuring Jacob is the reason Jacob is free today. Just a guess on my part.
Fox’s reaction to their mega-blunder is hilarious! As Megyn said, “Not one of these [leaks] is even remotely offensive.”
Love the Boris and Natasha poster.
(Btw, I’m embarrassed to admit that I finally figured out the word Foxweiser.)
If you have cable and are not watching Fox News please know you are still “paying” Fox News…they get a cut of your cable bill every month whether you watch it or not. Cut your cable.
Mine is cut 2 years now. Since my cable provider in Canada did not provide Fox I paid $4.99 did it because of PDJT and Tucker. Cut Fox Nov 2020 after the election, two months later cut cable all together.
The mask is definitely off FOX. A network is only as good as it’s lineup, and that lineup has been removed. Good riddance.
Regardless of the chosen venue, Carlson would provide an off ramp for conservatives to never return to Fox. Fox is banking on this being a temporary setback. Carlson, with the talent he can access, would create as daunting a threat as possible. Tulsi, if Fox let her go, could be a lefty-ish counterpoint. I would like to see it play out.
The Axios article is manipulative. A well worn tactic to diffuse an important disagreement into an emotional “contest.” The idea is to use inflammatory language to recast the issue into emotional us-them. Caught up in the side-choosing, the reader loses the point. Why was Tucker fired and by whom? We KNOW it was not for poor performance as he was number one in all metrics. By firing him, Fox dramatically rebranded itself into CNN and reassure Pfizer, the intel community, banks, and other criminals, that Fox is reliably on their side. Any anchor who remains on Fox bears this taint. They are decidedly propaganda now.
Were I a principled broadcaster at Fox, I would do a piece on recent statistics (provide they are confirmed) on race based criminality. According to that news, nearly 600,000 whites are victimized by Blacks, while only 59,000 the other way around. How does this play into the fake narrative of systemic racism? Recall that Blacks are a minority.
I don’t understand why Tucker doesn’t just resign. Sure, he will give up his salary but so what? He’ll make way more than that once he is free from Fox.
I do understand that there are likely provisions in his contract about not talking about Fox for a few years once he leaves. Fine. As Sundance points out, Fox is tanking on their own so Tucker doesn’t need to say anything bad about them.
It’s possible that the contract also names specific companies that Tucker is not allowed to work for for a period of time, but those limitations typically do not stand up in court because you can’t prevent a former employee from having gainful employment.
Something seems off here in regards to Tucker being gagged.
I would love to see him team up with Elon Musk! Didn’t musk say he wanted to step down as CEO of Twitter? Tucker would make a great replacement, Liberal heads would explode! …
How about Vice President?
Sundance: “One thing that should be noted – all of Roger Ailes’ former team would be willing to work free of charge to assist Tucker in breaking billionaire Rupert Murdoch if that was the intent. It’s not, because there’s no need to destroy an enemy that is destroying itself.“
What I Was just Thinking, right before I saw this TRUE STATEMENT by Sundance: How can Tucker hurt Fox News by Simply Telling the Truth about them? Unless their own Actions are SHOWING the World that they are doing actually much Worse to their own Reputation, than ANYTHING Tucker can find to say about them.
Because if Tucker tries to LIE about Fox News, then FOX NEWS’es OWN BEHAVIOR will show the world that TUCKER is Lying.
And IF TUCKER is LYING, then Fox NEWS’ STOCK would be going UP!
But Fox News’es behavior is showing the World that Fox News is actually Far Worse than anything Tucker can find to say about them.
If FOX NEWS doesn’t PROVE to the World that What Bad Things they think of Fox News IS A LIE – by their own actions…
Then Tucker “lying” about Fox will NOT impress the World at all.
After all, Look how FOX NEWS lies about good people, such as Donald Trump, and all that does is drive Donald Trump’s Numbers Higher and Higher.
And ever since FOX NEWS LIED about the 2022 Election Results on the Night of the Election Count, Calling Florida at 1% of the Florida Vote Counted, a win for Biden, causing TONS of Voters to LEAVE the polls without voting…
Yet STILL, THE WORLD KNOWS that TRUMP WON in 2022 — NOT BIDEN…. NOTHING FOX NEWS SAYS is receiving any ACCEPTANCE by the GENERAL PUBLIC. NOBODY in the WORLD cites FOX NEWS as a LEGITIMATE Source of information.
We take FOX NEWS ASSERTIONS as EVIDENCE AGAINST the Situation that Fox is talking about Like we always have done with CNN and with the Biden Administration.
THAT FOX NEWS IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED.
So we take their “NEWS” as a Starting place to look for what TRUTH they are TRYING to BURY!
Public Broadcast News has ALWAYS underestimated FLYOVER country’s 6 Degrees of Separation!
What we used to say about NEWSPAPERS in the Days of the Supremacy of The PRINTED NEWS – We Buy it for Packing paper and for the Bird Cages’ liners, and the Puppy papers on the floor to House Break the dogs.
I hope Tucka and the gang of former Fox folks will burn it down by simply telling the truth and pushing limits like SD does here.
Sundance is one of the bravest persons in the public eye.
I have taken out my copies of Braveheart and The Patriot and tried to tap into my deepest areas of courage to know IF I can put acts to thoughts.
I heard Ted Nugent on the radio. Several times he repeated, “I will not comply”. (I assumed he was discussing his rights under the 2nd). And I wondered……….if you are surrounded by men in black. boots and black uniforms with guns pointed at your head, will you remember the wife and 14yr old son murdered at Ruby Ridge, or the Men/women,children in of Waco, or perhaps the man burned alive in His CA home for resisting officers serving a warrant by exercising his 2nd rights, or the gentleman killed in the Bundy fiasco? I remember them and how no one suffered any consequences. I am not sure their sacrifices effected more than mention.
In The Patriot, we won in the end, but we collectively are letting that win slip away. How DO we win again? Trump is our William Wallace, teetering on the verge of being drawn and quartered by the powerful and corrupt judicial system. Do we have a Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison to lead the troops?
Unless we are told the actual issues with his contract, if any truly exist, and out of his own mouth, Tucker is doing what he always has, giving us just enough to keep us down, knowing we are being subjugated by the Man and there is not much if anything we can do about it. He’s a hope removal machine, nothing more, nothing less.
Hogwash
Is this the same Murdoch brand that bought Myspace?
I like the narrative about Big Foot. Any Murdoch brand that catches a clip of Big Foot, should be entertaining, regardless if it’s fake news.
“Did the capitol police help you get inside the place?”
Qanon shaman seen for first time after prison release…(video)
nypost.com/2023/04/02/qanon-shaman-housemates-stunned-to-learn-of-his-past/
Screw contracts. Nobody else pays attention to them these days … why should Carlson worry?
Yes and no. What TC must avoid, I think, is loose ends that lead to viable lawsuits Fox. I would want a clean break. Every day Fox keeps him in limbo, they accomplish their goal. I’ll bet they plan a, b, c already to go. Complete with a host of judges lined up to do their bidding.
I know Tucker is aware of the evil that he’s bumping up against and his best protection is visibility. See Andrew Brietbart, Seth Rich, Vince Foster (or the dozens of Clinton associates)
I know certain people will say there is no evidence that Andrew Breitbart was murdered. My response who is responsible for developing this evidence? That would be the corrupt DoJ and by extension it’s corrupt enforcement agencies (FIB) etc. With what we now know about the depth of criminality in the swamp and what would be my last response, is now my first.
The better question is what wouldn’t they do?
Watch your six Tucker, these are demons and “the ends justify the means”. Stay public, stay safe.
JFK and Seth Rich were not available for comment.
axios is garbage
I love the Faces Of Tucker meme! But I do miss his bow tie.
Hannity? Zipper problems? What’s up with that? Who is he tapping? Who’d want to be tapped by him?
Last article I saw reference that…..it was Ainsley Earhardt, co-host of Fox & Friends
Consider how many times Ms. Lindsey appears om his show.
So you think Hannity and Graham were bunk buddies? LOL
In the real world there is no such thing as conservative news or liberal news. There is news, and there is propaganda.
Not a Newsmax fan. I’ll stick with RAV.
The biggest corporate media blunder since Bud Light.
😂
Egalitarian America is dead.
Free speech or individualism is considered dissent, and our new ruling class of fascists do not tolerate dissent.
Journalists who stand out from the crowd will now be considered dangerous, and their message will be irrelevant. Hannity the company man is still doomed.
The question has been in the air for decades: why so many news sources that agree on most everything? Because there are so many advertisers that need an outlet for their commercial messages. That’s all.
That’s a good point Sundance that I mention often re Hannity. He is eligible to be fired at any moment now or in the future because of his violating company policy in sleeping with a subordinate employee. Hannity is completely compromised.
Now I am intrigued about Hannity’s zipper problem. He certainly has an intelligence problem but I never would have pegged him with an O’Reilly issue.
“AXIOS – Tucker Carlson is preparing to unleash allies to attack Fox News in an effort to bully the network into letting him work for — or start — a right-wing rival, sources close to him tell Axios.”
It’s just stupid beyond words. Fraud News doesn’t care what Tucker’s friends say about Fraud News. Nobody cares.
.
“State of play: The ousted host “knows where a lot of bodies are buried, and is ready to start drawing a map,” said a Carlson source who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.”
Again, nobody cares. Draw some maps? Who cares? It’s tabloid BS that wouldn’t even last one full news cycle. What ‘buried bodies’? What, Geraldo’s gay? Everyone has suspected for decades. Who cares?
.
“Carlson allies with big platforms are prepared to attack Fox for trying to keep him on the shelf.
Bare-knuckle brawlers from Trumpworld are standing by.”
Bare-knuckle brawlers… 😂🤣😂
Has there ever even been one on the conservative side, besides DJT himself? Most people on the conservative side wear elbow-length white gloves and carry a Marquess of Queensbury rule book in their back pocket. They apologize all over themselves at the first sign that they may have said something offensive to the Left.
This all sounds like complete BS.
Unless I missed it, we don’t even know the terms of Tucker’s separation from Fraud News, but if Fraud News tries to prevent Tucker from doing anything until after the 2024 election, that only works if Tucker wants it to, because:
1) Tucker is already independently wealthy, he doesn’t need any more money
2) Tucker could put everything he has into a Trust
3) Tucker could do whatever he wants then, and let Fraud News sue him — there’s nothing they could get, even if they won
4) Tucker could counter-sue and tie everything up in court past the 2024 elections, in the meantime he does whatever he wants
As Sundance often says, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. To me it seems obvious that his firing was part of the settlement agreement with Dominion.
Fox News should be more worried about Fox News damaging their image
Tucker or anybody else, doesn’t need to do anything to help bring Fox News down, they are doing a fine job themselves.
Constructive Dismissal.
Fox fired Tucker. Paying his contract while stapling his mouth shut doesn’t pass the smell test nor the legal test.
Murdoch’s just went full Trans. They cut off their ding-a-lings.