The issues surrounding Jack’s Magic Coffee Shop are still very opaque and seemingly clouded; however, there does seem to be some clarity surfacing in the bigger picture operation of the social media platform. Perhaps, just perhaps, we are starting to get a better understanding of how the public opinion control operation was being handled.
Readers here are very familiar with our researched suspicions of how this interconnected technology system, this weird public-private partnership was being conducted. For quite it has been obvious the various systems to control discussion would need connectivity.
Perhaps Twitter 2.0 is starting to recognize the industrial operation was evolved into a weird system of interconnected networks, necessitated by the larger government need. Whatever the outcome, the basic elements all seem to be aligning in the direction we discussed long ago and, if accurate, the ramifications should soon surface.
With that in mind and accepting that I genuinely do not want to be correct in this because the solution is even more troubling, perhaps it’s worthwhile going back to the original metaphor and see if things continue to make sense.
April 2022 – The metaphorical Jack had a great idea, open a coffee shop where the beverages were free and use internal advertising as the income subsidy to operate the business. Crowds came for the free coffee, comfy couches, fellowship, conversation and enjoyment.
It didn’t matter where Jack got the coffee, how he paid for it, or didn’t, or what product advertising the customers would be exposed to while there. Few people thought about such things. Curiously, it didn’t matter what size the crowd was; in the backroom of Jack’s Coffee Shop they were able to generate massive amounts of never-ending free coffee at extreme scales.
Over time, using the justification of parking lot capacity and township regulations, not everyone would be able to park and enter. Guards were placed at the entrance to pre-screen customers. A debate began.
Alternative coffee shops opened around town. It was entirely possible to duplicate Jacks Coffee Shop, yet no one could duplicate the business model for the free coffee. Indeed, there was something very unique about Jack’s Coffee Shop. Thus, some underlying suspicions were raised:
The only way Twitter, with 217 million users, could exist as a viable platform is if they had access to tech systems of incredible scale and performance, and those systems were essentially free or very cheap. The only entity that could possibly provide that level of capacity and scale is the United States Government – combined with a bottomless bank account. A public-private partnership.
If my hunch is correct, Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy. Let that sink in.
The U.S. technology system, the assembled massive system of connected databases and server networks, is the operating infrastructure that offsets the cost of Twitter to run their own servers and database. The backbone of Twitter is the United States government.
FREE COFFEE:
♦ June 2013: […] “Cloud computing is one of the core components of the strategy to help the IC discover, access and share critical information in an era of seemingly infinite data.” … “A test scenario described by GAO in its June 2013 bid protest opinion suggests the CIA sought to compare how the solutions presented by IBM and Amazon Web Services (AWS) could crunch massive data sets, commonly referred to as big data.” … “Solutions had to provide a “hosting environment for applications which process vast amounts of information in parallel on large clusters (thousands of nodes) of commodity hardware” using a platform called MapReduce. Through MapReduce, clusters were provisioned for computation and segmentation. Test runs assumed clusters were large enough to process 100 terabytes of raw input data. AWS’ solution received superior marks from CIA procurement officials”… (MORE)
♦ November 2013: […] “Twitter closed its first day of trading on Nov. 7, 2013, at $44.90 a share. In the years since then, it briefly traded above $70, but more recently, it has struggled.”
Jack’s free coffee shop has been for sale, but there’s no viable business model in the private sector. No one has wanted to purchase Twitter – it is simply unsustainable; the data processing costs exceed the capacity of the platform to generate revenue – until now….
And suddenly, the people who work in the backroom of Jack’s Magic Coffee Shop don’t want Jack to sell.
Twitter is not making a decision to decline the generous offer by Elon Musk because of stewardship or fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. The financials of Twitter as a non-viable business model highlight the issue of money being irrelevant. Twitter does not and cannot make money. Growing Twitter only means growing an expense. Growing Twitter does not grow revenue enough to offset the increase in expense.
There is only one way for Twitter to exist as a viable entity, people are now starting to realize this.
What matters to the people behind Twitter, the people who are subsidizing the ability of Twitter to exist, is control over the global conversation.
Control of the conversation is priceless to the people who provide the backbone for Twitter.
Once people realize who is subsidizing Twitter, everything changes.
That’s the fight. (more)
♦ 2021, Public-Private Partnership – The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazen they have made public admissions.
The biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to: (1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE); and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously, who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering, the actual data-mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however, private individuals can search and report back as long as they have access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership. The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously, the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political opposition as extremists.
July 26, 2021, (Reuters) – A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in order to review or remove it. (read more)
The influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our personal lives. In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the surveillance state to weaponize.
After the Patriot Act was triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being granted a massive amount of power. The problem with assembled power is always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own malicious benefit. That is exactly what the installation of Barack Obama was all about.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence weapons we should never have allowed to be created and turned those weapons into tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target was the essential fabric of our nation. Ultimately, this corrupt political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. From that perspective the fundamental change was successful.
…It’s all Connected Folks, SEE HERE
[…] “The vision was first outlined in the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise plan championed by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and IC Chief Information Officer Al Tarasiuk almost three years ago.” … “It is difficult to underestimate the cloud contract’s importance. In a recent public appearance, CIA Chief Information Officer Douglas Wolfe called it “one of the most important technology procurements in recent history,” with ramifications far outside the realm of technology.” (READ MORE)
One job…. “take the preexisting system and retool it so the weapons of government only targeted one side of the political continuum.”
Bit of a stab in the dark here, but I’d guess that unplugged server rack was just a stack of virtual server hosts. When that rack goes down, the load just shifts automatically to the available hosts still up. So, of course everything still worked. If Elon wants to shut down govt servers he may need to go into the storage system and see if he can identify their virtual servers and shut them down. Give me a shout Elon. Seems like your IT folks arent communicating well.
Dave, please stop. I can feel my mind going.
Elon was probably testing to see if the poorly documented software at twitter runs as its documentation suggests that it does.
If he disconnected a critical piece and it kept running, then it is not running in the way that documentation suggests that it does. Perhaps the removed piece is mirrored by a government server elsewhere which backs it up seemlessly and if necessary overrules its functions from outside the known twitter network.
I still don’t know or trust what Musk is up to. He seems to be half assing it to give us some distractions to chew on but nothing heavy duty. And why are only leftists reporting these “releases”?
Not true, I have been seeing articles on Gateway Pundit, just today was this one:
//www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/breaking-another-twitter-files-drop-twitter-rigged-covid-debate/
I’m referring to the reporters being given the stuff to release to everybody else.
Definitely skeptical. There is a GIANT fight going on behind the curtains.
Let’s hope the TRUTH wins out.
What would he stand to gain if not that which he has stated… we Americans have grown to ‘not trust’ anyone and we need to get past that
Whaaat?
NOOOO. What we need to get past is any remaining trust. Trusting psychopaths and the criminally insane is a stupid idea Godfrey.
You are 100 percent correct – no releases of names of the government officials – only giving files to liberal/progressive reporters. Most of what has been release has been known by many of us who have been banned by Twitter, FB, YouTube, etc. Not much new information.
Elon Musk is a billionaire because of the Climate Change and Green Energy Hoax – his companies are all financed by the very government that he is exposing. Don’t Trust Elon Musk. Plus he is in bed with China/Xi/CCP just like Bidens, Apple, Google, Obamas, Clintons, etc.
I am with you!
The big takeaway on all of this so far is that the DOJ hasn’t lifted a finger to a landfill of info showing criminal activity. The judge in AZ throwing out Kari Lake’s lawsuit is likely a foreshadow of what’s to come forth from Musk’s info…nothing.
Perhaps Elon posted those tweets as a subtle indication that he understood what the people on the other end of the wire were up to.
what purpose would that serve?
if the purpose was to send not so subtle signal, would it not have been more effective to simply disconnect those remote server api connections and block them AND THEN OBSERVE IF THERE WAS ANY ALGO AND CONTROL MODERATION CHANGES?
that would actually serve a more critical fact finding demonstration, rather than winking and nodding with innuendo?
subtely only gets you so far with power.
true power asserts itself because it can.
you either have that power, or you lose it when you refuse to use it.
I am confused with the latest strategies in these stepped maximum impact releases.
read my posts earlier in this thread for my reservations and doubts.
RAID – RAID 1 offers complete redundancy. With 2 drives, it will mirror all data to the other drive.
Sounds like Elon doesn’t understand he’s got a twitter tiger by the tail. The people here understand better than he does. I hope it goes bankrupt, the only way to stop it imo.
As long as we keep paying taxes the gubmint will NOT go bankrupt. WE might, but they won’t.
His tweet about shutting down a whole rack of servers is probably just humor, but I suspect there is a message behind it, and the response by Massie is interesting.
Just so everyone knows, twitter doesn’t run its business entirely on its own servers any more. They use Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud. Using other companies’ cloud offerings allows you reduce your costs, no more need to buy/maintain/replace servers and operating systems, no more need for dedicated server admins. So twitter has a hybrid model and it looks like they are working toward being all-AWS and -Google … except for those “sensitive” servers that they need full control of, or the government does …
AWS, that’s a problem. Google, that’s another.
I agree.
Obama had lots of Coffee beans for Jack to plant. From 2013
How do we have the 4th Branch become the lobsters in the pot instead of the American people?
I LOVE that visual…
Please don’t insult 🦞 lobsters!
Possession of power and the willingness to use that power like the previous poster, said
By losing the US dollar’s reserve currency status.
That will force us into massively downsizing the deep sh8t state.
You would actually have to disconnect ALL the servers from the internet and start over, one at a time. And I don’t have to point out what would be happening in the formerly functional twitterspace while you did that.
No sentient being in the modern world could not understand this.
Everything for the State, everything of the State.
Track down the server that holds the data, while I count the grains of sand on the beach.
Good point. In actuality the CIA and forerunners have used this technique of manipulating the conversations of our adversaries as far back as WWII or maybe before. When I first realized it I was low level in the community and naive enough not to believe it because I wanted to believe we were all ‘good’
Best outcome might be to so discredit the system that nobody uses it .
The entire nation would be better off economically, spiritually, and socially if Americans would largely abandon Twitter, Facebook, Google, and Amazon. All of these are too intimately connected to the government. Social media is truly a playground for the immature . . .
Is The Treehouse a form of social media? The Open Thread might be even more so?
Could be, but Treepers are far more mature than the average Twitter/Facebook snowflake . . .
Why, thank you.
We’re not trying to START something like they are……we would be happy to keep THEM from taking us all down with them.
Prevention is the object. JMHO.
There are probably more agents in here than most Twitter threads
I’ve never been on Twitter, cancelled both Facebook & Amazon accounts almost 2 years ago which felt AWESOME, & haven’t used Google for even longer… I have tried to tell people about the 4 evil entities, but some are more receptive than others…
I agree completely…’as I comment on social media’
agreed as a final chopsuey or this shit show, but before that it would delight me and millions of others I am sure to continue to use that platform until the very last hour of operation disseminating raw unsalted facts that might actually lead to some criminal complaints and financial crimes and constitutional legal battles.
but yes, when that is all done, flush twitter into a salt pit. Then we do the same with meta/facebook…perhaps simultaneously.
both are getting hammered financially…might be the perfect moment to burn them to the ground with style and purpose.
As I perused twitter’s Engineering section of its site, looking through the various projects and developments, my first thought was, literally: military.
https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us
Considering all the DC swamp rats who came out claiming freedom of speech on Twitter was a threat to national security, one can conclude that’s it’s not freedom of speech per se, but rather the exposure of the government control of the media that is the threat.
The Twitter revelations will be the tip of the iceberg.
The IC has penetrated every public and private institution that matters to shape the narrative.
Why would the government allow musk to buy Twitter and let all this stuff get exposed?
Do you remember when Twitter told people who’d been kicked off or suspended that if they didn’t like it they could go build their own platform? Well to Twitter’s surprise, they did just that. There are now a number of young but rapidly growing alternatives to Twitter. The government doesn’t want that. Not at all. They want everyone trapped on monopoly platforms that they control.
By letting Musk ride in on a white horse and roll out these bombshell revelations it reassures people on the alternative platforms that freedom has returned to New Twitter. It’s safe to come back. And everyone is welcomed back. And at first it will feel freer.
What I suspect the government wants to happen, is happening. People are abandoning the alternative platforms to rush back to Twitter. Catturd hasn’t posted on Gab since November. MTG comes to Gab now mainly to tell people to follow her on Twitter. I have no reason not to believe this is happening on all the young startup competitors to Twitter.
Once these alternative competitors fold and disappear, then the government can aggressively return to controlling Twitter content. Then it will be too late to escape the platform as there will be no alternatives remaining. Anyway, that’s my suspicion.
Yes, the alternatives were gaining too much traction. They only have a small window to get everyone back on the plantation before the next round of censorship hits. Once again there will be few alternatives and those will be sparsely populated with limited followers.
People need to go to and/or stay on the alternatives and build out their communications networks if they are willing to continue using these forms of communications.
this is a very plausible strategy even if not planned precisely, according to some specific plan. I think it is safe to say that elon has drawn the ire and investigative interests of many governments agencies.
the one thing that I continue to remind is that the USG can issue a national security letter at any time to any individual or party or business or group. If that entity fails to comply with this national security letter, it has been demonstrated that the USG will and has issued very serious violations threats, some real, some threatened only, and also a host of other regulatory actions and other actions, many of which would strain the financial solvency of even the largest companies. The USG can use that power. It has used that power before.
Elon may have been allowed, but there is no doubts in my mind that he has been issued and his team members a NSL or several related to specific subjects of “investigation” and counter-intelligence covert operations. All legally binding.
we can thank the expanded patriot act and the weaponization of the fisa act and other surveillance authorities and the continued pause of due process against americans broadly and also hyper focused.
I am with you though…the USG would have a imperative to continue mastery over twitter and other social media content and narrative. with or without elon is a secondary consideration.
Twatter kicked me off twice. I’m never going back.
Sad but true.
Good surmise… hope you’re wrong but you’re probably spot on
A very pertinent question, one that needs an answer.
Even the ‘infallible’ government screws up now and then. Besides, I think Musk is a hell of a lot smarter than those who would maneuver against him
Special access to Starlink?
perhaps my understanding of hosted servers is dated, but would not there be a twitter service that lists all known api’s?
one does not simply walk into mordor. Nor do remote servers just mysteriously walk into a connection to a twitter production server.
my cat is skeptical.
just saying.
one theory: the release of this material and others before it may just be a method of disseminating limited hangout information *but carefully withholding by omission other damning information and so trust nothing.
one theory: the release is legitimate but actual evidence to make the assertion is held back to avoid a likely legal case that might collapse the elon owned 42 billion dollar venture that at present is staged to file another very bad quarter.
one theory: the “agencies” and contractors that control twitter hosting are shadow “advertisers”..injecting ads in the stream…but also using those same twitter super access controls to also coordinate with internal twitter moderators to capture very rapidly that information that is deemed a threat to the narrative or potential legal liability exposure or both.
one theory: elon is a master troll…and or his second in command technoking. Laying claims that may or may not even be true.
the reasons why my skeptical cat is active: there is an obvious absence of direct evidence with names, and there does not appear to be any legal filing made on behalf of anyone inside twitter or outside of twitter related to the “releases”..that strikes me as odd. One would expect to see some legal action and claims mades at this point. But without a public dissemination of hard evidence, with names, people and places, time and date and a clear violation of some civil, financial or criminal statute, there is nothing here to give me any impression these releases are going to lead to anything. they might, and maybe it is too early for those issues to develop maturely before filing. But it is odd to possess the single largest social media platform (or one of the largest), and not release that uncurated material and follow up with legal actions.
I am not seeing the benefit at all of releasing this information without the so called smoking guns.
what law was broken? how was elon or other harmed? specifically, who is responsible for that harm?
is the legal argument purely that elon is looking to reexamine the purchase price because there was something unlawful that took place? if so, cite the statute and show the evidence. For crying out loud, you have the entire world ready to read it.
release it.
otherwise, I will look at this as leading to nothing that will cause a possible change in the current state of the relationship and power held between big tech and social media and the USG.
Maybe I am not seeing the big picture correctly.
but there are huge gaps in these releases. Some are named, but there does not appear to be a crime that was committed that anyone is actively discussing.
nor is there a civil or financial claim.
maybe I suffer from being impatient.
maybe I have learned that this smells rotten.
God Bless America
See 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(4). 2005. Here is your answer. May seem unrelated but it definitely is.
I just read Twitter’s 2021 annual report and noted a few things, potentially germane.
1/ For a sw company, they are spectacularly poor performing. For this company, the clear leader, to be so horrific is a surprise. With minor management action to operational cost (mainly headcount), twitter could easily have been profitable.
2/ Twitter’s revenue stems from advertising (89%) and licensing data (11%). This is another surprise. Often, in listening in on investors calls these days, one of the questions pressed hardest is how management intends to monetize user data because user data is viewed as an immensely valuable asset. And here is twitter, sitting on a mountain of the most valuable user data imaginable and all they can think to do with it is to create a development platform giving 3rd parties access to it. Also those smart people, and they’re focused on making a safe space and curated content, but not on making money? Makes no sense to me. How does the BOD not challenge this?
3/ Data Center expenses are accumulated under an expense category called “Cost of Revenue” accounting for 35% of revenue! Not familiar with software companies like Twitter, but that seems huge to me. Maybe could compare to a cloud services company like Salesforce.com. I mean, yes, Twitter has a lot of users, but resource demand/user seems low. I guess network bandwidth is huge and I guess multiple redundant data centers for availability would add up, but still. I’m more used to seeing IT expenses buried in G&A, not included in determination of gross income.
4/ R&D expense at 25% of revenue seems a bit high but not not off the chart for even a mature sw company. There was a huge unexplained increase in R&D headcount from 2020 to 2021 enabled by raising advertising rates in 2021. R&D expense is somewhat understated also because it looks like 10-15% is amortization of capitalized sw expense. Doing this tends to make a sw company appear more profitable than it actually is. This shows up in the form of issuance of about $900mil/yr of Sr convertible notes (for cash).
5/ Sales and Marketing expense at 23% of revenue seems low to me for a sales group that has to track both small and major accounts globally.
6/ Twitter had an operating loss of 8% of revenue before taxes. This is pathetic for a mature market leader. The Board was clueless.
7/ As came out during the Musk acquisition the sole KPI for this business is a mushy, ill defined metric called mDAU. How did institutional investors not call for more granular information to gauge growth of this dumpster fire? It just makes no sense. I KNOW institutional investors of sw companies are way more savvy than this.
My take on this situation is that it’s far more likely that the regime or institutional investors wanted Musk to come in and clean it up versus Musk seeing a business opportunity or caring enough about free speech to risk half his fortune. I will say, cutting headcount as radically as he did should should help but it might also dramatically cut advertising revenue. If I were him, I’d make Sales fat and happy by not cutting them 75%. And I’d be looking really hard at that Cost of Sales line because there may be savings in there (possibly waaay too much capacity).
As far as weirdness in the lease and “colocation agreements”, I dont have a clue what that means, but I see no evidence that it means the govt is paying for the data center.
If I had to guess, I’d say the govt has a straw stuck in the twitter database and they may have servers running govt software processing data flowing through the straw. The evidence so far seems to suggest that anything going back to Twitter does not go through the straw, but is fed back using a manual process.
James Clapper isn’t championing anything except Wapner at 4.
The thing is, its not doing what it was originally SOLD as intending to do; stop TERRORISM.
A long list of both ideological suicide type nutjobs (“islamic extremists) as well as your basic nutjob lone mass shooters, most of whom AFTER THE FACT, were found to have an internet posting history that “should” have had them flagged, weren’t stopped.
So, they built the system, and sold it as neccesary to keep the citisenry “safe” (from islamic extremists and lone nutjobs) but DON’T seem to expend ANY manpower, actually using it to look for and thwart such attacks, but have over 80 FBI agents, and thats just working with TWITTER, who knows how many total, exclusively chasing grannies who took the Capital tour without permission?
Bait and switch, false advertising.
I have been convinced for some time now, all the “thwarted islamic extremists attacks” were SET UPs.
All to justify reauthorusation of the Patriot act, without any hearings or amendments.
Guys rotting in prison, who NEVER would have blown up the Statue of Liberty, or whatever if not inticed, goaded and manipulated into giving them enough evidence for a prosecution.
And/or, several attacks they KNEW about, but let happen anyway/encouraged, like the attack in Texas, where the FBI DROVE THE ATTACKER TO THE SITE, just to “keep the threat REAL”.
War on terror, what a SCAM!
It has been successful in identifying and stopping “the enemy” —US.
It is time to disconnect HAL, Dave!
Dutch, sounds right on.
Perhaps, just perhaps, we are starting to get a better understanding of how the public opinion control operation was being handled.
‘The Perhaps’ that, “Is now very abundantly clear to all that follow the CTH.”
‘The Perhaps’ was never a grass root endeavor nor a societal statistically population sample representation.
In that exhibit A in any Court of Constitutional Law is in that…
The ‘Twitter File Revelations’ are nothing more than those that controlled the purse strings of Corporate advertising AKA PR Firms AKA 5th Avenue AKA ‘dare I say, those Iiving a codependency relationship on society , with, ‘Raft of God’ monies at their disposal towards validating their societally revelenancy.
That is the so called ‘grassroots’ no longer floats the day to day costs of the MSM.
Renumeration is achieved through this ‘Rath of God Monies.’
Everything else is lip service designed to think we actually have a voice.
That is each and everyone of us belly up each month an installment payment that is ‘the codepency deposit’ against our shared humanity.
And I don’t say that lightly.
Basicaly Big Tech is fasley presenting amplifiers that validated/justisfy this society relevance….
I am attempting a reasonably voice on the left/right divide that there is a misaligned magority being repressed. To the determinant of all!!
When in truth, to all evidence to the contrary, “Much of that grassroot’s victimhood is artificial through social media AI Bots designed to present validation of a grassroots offspring.”
The Who is with us, whom can be against us argument requires such thoughtful argumentation.
Just think about it …….
Perhaps, Social Media Platforms are simply the modern day Propaganda version used for ‘mind-control’ as was used in the Vietnam War: https://codyburleson.com/books/cage/vietnam-war-propaganda
and WWII: https://www.history.com/news/how-tokyo-rose-became-wwiis-most-notorious-propagandist
https://www.bakerlaw.com/alerts/immunity-from-liability-for-persons-engaged-in-medical-countermeasures-against-the-covid-19-pandemic. Now i know why Karen Kingston is calling this not a vax but a bioweapon. You must read this.
just following orders is legal now.
If my memory is correct was not Musk be sued to buy Twitter?
Yes – TWitter sued Musk when he backed out of the purchase agreement. During discovery things looked bad for Musk so he just went ahead and bought the company.
One big :What are PSYOP activities?
PSYOP has been officially defined in DOD doctrine as “planned political, economic, military, and ideological activities directed towards foreign countries, organizations, and individuals in order to create emotions, attitudes, understanding, beliefs, and behavior favorable to the achievement of United States political …Mar 6, 2018 = TWITTER
Simple question: if the Deep State utilized social media for mind control of the masses, why on earth would they allow Musk to buy Twitter?
Because Musk is a government tool. Would not be a billionaire without all the Taxpayer subsidies for all his companies… He is a government welfare queen…
“The financials of Twitter as a non-viable business model highlight the issue of money being irrelevant.”
That’s an incredibly out of touch & ignorant statement to make when at the time Twitter was a publicly traded company.
Anyone remember that when Anthony Quinn Warner allegedly set off his RV bomb at the NSA bunker style building AT&T, Bellsouth data center in Nashville Tennessee on the 25th of December of 2020? 185 2nd Ave N, Nashville TN 37201. How this was seen by some to bring to light these types of NSA server farms that store data. Data likely to give good intelligence of who were the parties connected to the electronic ballot machines used in election rigging in 2020 and 2022. Such server farm bunkers are found in every major city around the world.
Elon is just bringing out this information as another data point to how the system really works to enslave and control humanity. Note too its the Artificial Intelligence Quantum computers who manage it all. Yet few truly understand the ramifications of it all. Yet. But hey yeah, don’t forget to TRUST THE PLAN.
“Nashville’s SunGard is a data center involved in colocation, hosting, enterprise cloud services, remote IT services, messaging and collaboration, and network and managed security services. Colocation means that the center allows other businesses to rent space for their own servers or other computing hardware. Enterprise cloud services allow other businesses to pay to use virtual IT resources.” – Source: https://www.rightjournalism.com/photos-after-the-explosion-reveal-that-the-bombing-target-the-att-building-in-nashville-is-reinforced-nsa-style-building/
“SuicideSeattle – “WHY NASHVILLE? WHY ATT? Here’s your answer. Room 641A is a telecom intercept facility operated by AT&T for the U.S. NSA, as part of its warrantless surveillance program, Patriot Act. What part of the country does this “hub” cover? GEORGIA” – This Tweet is from a suspended account: https://twitter.com/scott_sfs/status/1342891578885599232/