Australia has an eSafety Commissioner named Julie Inman-Grant. While delivering remarks to the World Economic Forum summit in Davos, Switzerland, she outlined a new on-line era where free speech would need to be “recalibrated,” and the ability to be free from something called “on-line violence.” WATCH:
https://youtu.be/ydW6wDMQHX8
.
For the past several years we have noted a progressive, totalitarian, shift in speech, specifically a redefinition of the word “violence.” Speech the leftists do not like, they call violence; and violence the leftists support, they call speech. As a result, the overlay of a newly recalibrated on-line world for speech and violence would be modified accordingly.
Speech the Big Tech consortium would define as against their views would be considered on-line violence and thus controlled by the governmental guardians of the internet like the eSafety Commissioner. As you can see in the video below, “violence” now includes their perception of something happening on a metaphysical level. An emotional impact. They have a spiritual avatar that they feel the drive to defend from the viewpoints of the Others.
.
.
In September 1970, Klaus Schwab voiced grave concerns regarding privacy of information – what happened between 1970 and now, Klaus? Where and when did you change your mind?
He didn’t change his mind per’se. He just recalibrated it.
Good answer!
Being an Australian I am sickened by this unelected idiot and her dangerous comments. She basically wants everybody to be shut up, except her and those she likes.
Recalibrating freedom of speech is utterly wrong whatever way you try to twist it. The only recalibrating needed is to shut down Big Tech and others if they continue to support lying, misinforming and silencing
The land down under has pumped out more tyranny per capita than any other first world nation in my life time. It sucks to see. I always wanted to visit. I know that Australia is filled with fantastic people. Sadly, because of the like of the people at Davos, I will never get to visit them in their homeland.
Freedom of speech in the United States means that people we don’t like also have freedom of speech, even when we consider it lying or misinforming. We don’t aim for LESS speech, but MORE. But they also have to go by those rules.
No….but it is past time to send a hypersonic missile into Davos…
Putin would be treated like a rock star for putting an end to the globalist nightmare.
I can only imagine the unbridled happiness of hundreds of millions, if not billions of people should that actually happen. The people in Davos are the worst of humanity, and they need to be dealt with. I don’t care who does it.
Hell, just knee-cap their private jets.. They’d bitch-moan-complain about being stuck in Davos…
46.80429 9.83723 (or) 46°48’15.44″ N 9°50’14.03″ E (or) u0qfrb7qb04. Pick your preferred system, then fine tune as needed to locate 7260 Davos Platz, Graubu.
I would like to see a few precise examples of speech that should be “recalibrated”.
On an unrelated note…
How about we also recalibrate legislation to lower the current threshold for punishing Government malfeasance? This recalibration will by necessity need to include a substantial expansion vis a vis the application of capital punishment, to address the rampant violations of constitutional law, and the egregious abuse of Government power. With a particular focus on the career oriented unelected bureaucracy
For our struggles are not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of the dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
Ephesians 6:12
“For the past several years we have noted a progressive, totalitarian, shift in speech, specifically a redefinition of the word “violence.” Speech the leftists do not like, they call violence; and violence the leftists support, they call speech.”
This is aptly noted. When, if ever, does the Patriot response rise beyond copious note-taking? The flesh wounds add up by the day, all diligently noted here like a proper Masochist’s Handbook.
As always, proper respect for SD’S analytical and rhetorical prowess.
MAGA was tried once. In the ashes of its failure, Operation Warp Speed managed to squeeze by. Did anyone notice?
So we suffer death by a thousand notations interspersed with myocarditis and the demotion of billions of humans from homo sapiens to homo borg genesis & vassalized patented chimera status.
The CofC has moved beyond mere boosterism of China-favored trade flows and gone for the jugular of the human genome. It’s all been ably diarized here for years. One thing about the other side is that they’re always galloping towards an eschatological end-point. We have the notes to prove it. No doubt our grandchildren will thank us for a seemingly bottomless storehouse of shock, disbelief and outrage punctuated by inertia.
Fortunately, an upsurge in 2024 via a Son of MAGA movement is going to save us. But who us? Does a genetically-colonized Pfizer nRNA borg still count for an ‘us’? Will vaccinated human livestock still fall within the protective sphere of human rights? Can they properly be called homicide victims anymore should they run afoul of another’s bullet?
Sounds like we’re in for two more years of grave and cogent diary entries, if we’re lucky. SD’s an astute reader of tea-leaves. He can hardly be blamed for unerring astuteness. But is there a call-to-action bobbing somewhere within this ceaseless flurry of astute observations. Or is it Nextdayism for as far as the eye can see?
I feel for ya Australia. A woman from California is dictating what you can and cannot say in your own country, while people from India are dictating to America the parameters of free speech here.
Can we recalibrate her speech or is it just ours that needs to be curtailed?
We are pretty much at the end of language and the impact of words. We have run out of options to talk our way out of this looming dystopia.
Yep. Which leaves the Second Amendment.
Limiting speech, especially by committees in back rooms, is not a good idea.
These people who suggest these things should study history a little more. Even with the best of intentions, this morphs into something else in a very short time.
Not allowing certain words, violent phrases, violence, pornography restrictions (child in particular), are all obvious corrections which could be done immediately.
Why aren’t they focused on correcting the things we can correct?
“They don’t really care about us!”
There is a little known clip of John Lennon around where he says :
” I think we’re being run by maniacs ”
He was right.
dave mccormick in pennsylvania is tied to these scum thru his wife, who is in charge of ‘sustainability’ for the WEF.
WTF is sustainability, in WEF-speak?
If you’re killed in the matrix, you die here?
The body cannot live without the mind.
When you die in the Matrix you die in real life.
It’s easy to be free from “online violence”. Turn off the device.
If her eyebrows get any higher, and her smart-ass smirk gets any wider, we’ll have to call her Nanzy-2.
You must be referring to PORKy Piglosi.
So cyber peace means eliminating or killing the the opposing view. Hasn’t the world heard this before?
Censorship is a pandemic
Left to Julie Inman sits Petra de Sutter a Belgian transgender minister
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petra_De_Sutter
Two things of note:
In the first 26 second video, she mentions something very ominous … “child dignity protection” or more precisely the ability to recruit children to the LGBT deviant life style.
In the second video she mentions the Cyberpeace Foundation. The following is a link to an overview to that foundation. The article is loaded with links to all the “right” places with respect to funding, causes, et al that support Global Control of Information Flow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberpeace_Foundation
Steppenwolf while I disagree with much of their music had some things right
The spirit was freedom and justice
And it’s keepers seem generous and kind
It’s leaders were supposed to serve the country
But now they won’t pay it no mind
‘Cause the people grew fat and got lazy
And now their vote is a meaningless joke
They babble about law and order
But it’s all just an echo of what they’ve been told
Yeah, there’s a monster on the loose
It’s got our heads into a noose
And it just sits there watchin’
Our cities have turned into jungles
And corruption is stranglin’ the land
The police force is watching the people
And the people just can’t understand
We don’t know how to mind our own business
‘Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us
Now we are fighting a war over there
No matter who’s the winner
We can’t pay the cost
‘Cause there’s a monster on the loose
It’s got our heads into a noose
And it just sits there watching
(America)
America where are you now?
Don’t you care about your sons and daughters?
Don’t you know we need you now
We can’t fight alone against the monster
That woman is an American intelligence officer.
Speech the leftists do not like, they call violence; and violence the leftists support, they call speech.
that just about does it.
… but I’ll bet her free speech is in no need at all of re-calculation. Just another cancer on the body we call the human race.
It’s as if these types are singled out and groomed at a very young age, because no true raised American could ever think this way.
The gullible are so easily manipulated, mentally and emotionally. That’s why they now start twisting the minds of our kids and grooming them to be activists as early as 1st grade.
Natural Law will not become extinct over rich crocks of 💩. WWJD