And to think some say there is something rotten in Denmark.

Our whole election system needs an enema.

Not to nitpick, the town of Windham is located in Rockingham County. Just want to provide a little clarity to the above article.

Taking bets that this occurred in red counties/precincts.

Right (sarcasm).
And somehow all of the democrat candidates in that county all received 300 overvotes by coincidence. BS.

This is incredible pre planned fraud. Where is law enforcement? Why aren’t democrats going to jail? We are becoming a banana republic!!!!

Results by county:

https://sos.nh.gov/elections/elections/election-results/2020/general-election/

Claremont is in Sullivan County

Sample ballots by county:

https://web.archive.org/web/20201028004216/https://sos.nh.gov/elections/elections/2020-election-information/sample-general-election-ballots/

Got to hand it to the Democrats. They solved this problem by printing up fake ballots which had no folds and all of them were read and accepted by the voting machine.

Meanwhile… across the country in the great state of ArrrrrrriZONA(!)… Katie Hob Knob is babbling incoherently…

“Arizona secretary of state slams ‘highly partisan,’ ‘fringe’ election audit”

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/555303-arizona-secretary-of-state-slams-highly-partisan-fringe-election-audit

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) is raising new concerns about the way auditors hired by the Republican-controlled state Senate have handled more than 2.1 million ballots from the 2020 election that sat for more than a week in hot and humid trailers waiting to be counted.

Huh? Ok… please explain…

“Where the ballots were being stored, it was not a facility that was suitable for storage, because everything was exposed to heat and also humidity because of the method of cooling in the building,” Hobbs said in an interview Monday, as auditors resumed their process. “Any time you’re doing any process like this, the idea of having to start and stop, that interruption, we were already concerned that there were a lot of procedures that were changing and errors that were happening, and I think this increases the chance for those errors.”

What in the HELL is she even talking about???

Come on… spit it out, Katie Hob Knob… don’t embarrass yourself with nonsense, now…

Time for a National Class Action Lawsuit where 75M Americans join in and we ask Sidney Powell to represent us where our first action is the discovery of all communications.

Imagine if the communications trail were to show that this was a organized plan all along from individuals outside the states giving “direction” down to the state level?

Gov. Sununu: “New Hampshire elections are safe, secure, and reliable. Out of the hundreds of thousands of ballots cast this last year, we saw only very minor, isolated issues — which is proof our system works. This bill will help us audit an isolated incident in Windham and keep the integrity of our system intact.”

Bullsh*t, Governor.

Are you auditing an isolated incident…or isolating an audit incident?

You stink, pal.

The group doing this is under the tutelage of Matylyn Todd, an auditor by trade. They are also the ones who helped raise the money to hire Jovan.

This is their fakebook group, where you might find additional info:

NH Voter Integrity Group
https://www DOT facebook DOT com/groups/1812440712260615

I think the evidence is very solid that the same problems were occurring in other NH counties.

And I would guess that if they were using AccuVote machines, the same trick with a Democrat candidate printed off index will have been used in the other towns/counties ballots.

What I believe the presenter may have wrong is claiming overvotes caused the ballots to be disqualified. I think the problem is far worse: sent to human “adjudication” where the presidential candidate selection was reversed.

What the presenter does have right is the mendacity of the auditors in Windam. They don’t want to acknowledge that the problem isn’t a accidental machine error (the printing of the ballot proves that is a lie). They don’t want to admit to the issue of the presidential vote changes (they just want all eyes on the state rep race). And they certainly don’t want anyone to look at the rest of the state/s beyond Windam where AccuVote machines were used.

What are the odds that this same absentee “crease issue” exists on other state ballots?

I think if I’m GA or AZ or MI or WI or PA or NV that would be the first thing I’d check.

They cheated in so many different ways. One commonality though is that in all of these places the scamdemic gave them the cover they needed to perpetrate this steal. That and the dirty SOS, governors, DOJ, etc etc refusing to uphold their constitutional duties. It’s so disgusting it’s almost unbelievable. Thus the sheeple don’t believe that it was stolen.

It is beginning to look like just maybe Joe Biden didn’t get 900 electoral votes and 2 billion popular votes after all.

But just try to tell him that.

For mature technology, this is not excusable. Rather, it is evidence of connivance.

Why?

Because, it is/would be known that the fold line degrades the scanning effectiveness. That’s what one would call obvious. So obvious, in fact, that it would be standard procedure to WARN the ballot producers NOT to place voting blocks in the vicinity of the fold line. There would be a template depending upon what folds are designed for the ballot.

This is premeditated criminal conduct. 100%.

Oh, and I forgot the other obvious. Who gets credit for adjudicating a ballot exactly incorrectly?

Let me see if I comprehend this correctly (I gladly welcome any corrections because I want to understand this properly):

Overvote ballots were not included in the final tallies.

The examples provided showed that the faulty machines registering overvotes reveal a pattern in which Democrats got more votes than Republicans, CONTRARY to the other non-faulty machine results which showed Republicans getting more votes.

BUT since overvote ballots WEREN’T counted in the final tallies, the anomalously-high Democratic vote counts on the faulty machines weren’t awarded to Democrats. HOWEVER, Republican votes on those machines wouldn’t have been counted either. SO, since the other machines in the examples showed higher percentages of Republican votes, the faulty machines essentially deprived Republican candidates of higher numbers in the final tallies.

You have to acknowledge the genius behind the fraudsters in the methodology used to “fool” the people at the summary level.

The DemoCommie cheaters obviously did not believe such a detailed forensic audit would take place…hence the summary tapes from the machines was pure gold as evidence of the cheating done on one or more machines in each town.

Mail ballots must have two clear horizontal areas where folds would normally occur, and also those two areas marked clearly with horizontal lines labeled “FOLD HERE ONLY”.

Maybe this is all merely 20/20 hindsight, but because the problems ONLY benefitted Democrat candidates and never Republicans, IMHO, trying to say that was just “coinkydink” is a non-starter.

I just remember election night, and Treepers and others on the ground in NH said President Trump took NH “EASILY” – emphasis mine. Ground reports also said the same in Virginia. This was a top 5 inflection point in our country’s history. If we can keep it…

Back in 2008 NH officials knew there were problems with the machines, and did NOT fix it –
https COLON //blackboxvoting dot org/new-hampshire-election-credibility/
Black Box Voting is an excellent site.

The Gateway Pundit wrote about this – .thegatewaypundit DOT com/2021/05/silvestro-family-supplied-tabulators-elections-new-england-states-decades-will-election-2020-last/

Commentator ‘Budanevey’ wrote this comment: “The Software Operating System in voting machines is called GEMS (General Election Management System). It’s common to various machines like Smartmatic, Sequoia, ES&S, Diebold and Dominion, which evolved through various corporate acquisitions and mergers, now under the umbrella of the Carlyle Group involving the Clintons, Romneys, CCP and Soros etc.

One of the features is the ‘Reject Settings tab’ where parameters can be set for how a machine identifies and deals with potential errors. In theory, poll-workers are trained to recognize ballot-scanning errors, and separate them so that a voter can correct any mistakes, but this is not practical with mail-in votes or large numbers. Crucially, the software allows for errors to be ‘overridden’ and transmitted to a host computer.

This points to the MO found in Antrim, where the machines were configured to manufacture errors at a rate of 68% (the Election Assistance Commission only allows an error rate of 1 in 250,000). These ballots should have been returned for the voters to correct, but they weren’t. In fact, errors on this scale should have stopped the Election, and the machines taken out of service under EAC rules requiring recertification.

They would have produced error messages on the machine LCD such as ‘over-vote’, but an operator could manually override these messages, transmitting the ballots to a computer operator who could then decide how to apportion them between the candidates. This is how fraud is possible. The process of ‘Adjudication’ allows a third party to select who wins an Election, not the voter, or it could be a ‘man-in-the-middle’ on the network who decides (which is where the Lindell data and Frank Algorithm comes in).

The tell-tale sign is ‘ballot rejections’, and that’s what we are seeing in Antrim, Windham, Ware, Coffee, Fayette, Luzerne, and Fulton, where ballots are processed as errors, and placed in a computer folder for a third party to allocate.

We saw it happening on video in Fulton, because the poll-workers were repeatedly running the same batches into the machines, deliberately creating over-vote errors by recirculating the same ballots that were then pooled into a computer folder where a third party could allocate them to Biden. This happened during fake shutdowns, and were followed by huge ballot-dumps for Biden in the overnight count. Just 4 large overnight ballot-dumps in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania decided the Election for Biden. The good Election supervisors in Coffee County subsequently made a video showing how every ballot they scanned into their system was classified as an ‘error’ and passed to a computer for ‘Adjudication’, and the operator was able to change all the votes.”

I do not personally know if all this is 100% correct, but it sure is worth finding out in ALL states.

Remember: The “Windham Incident” started with just TWO Patriotic, persistent, hardworking, busy men who run their own businesses. Are there TWO such people in YOUR state?

The machines must go!

Yes. All of this info needs to be cited. We are going up against puke scumbags who have no morals! If this video is accurate it is looking more and more clear that intelligence agencies of “some sort”were involved in this. Folding machines folding on the exact bubble causing over-votes for only republicans. Haha… I do not believe in coincidences or conspiracies but this just reeks of professional help, not just your everyday partisan hack fixing elections. These election officials definitely got help from somewhere willingly or unwillingly….

NH – do-over
AZ – do-over
GA – do-over
MI – do-over
WI – do-over
PA – do-over

Heck, just do the whole thing over again with paper ballots and manual counting and invite observers in from every country … Democrats will absolutely hate being under that kind of microscope.

It looks like the fold always went through the Republicans .

Just as a bad batch of ground beef might spread food poisoning across the country, more and more “cases” of e. coli are awaiting the attention of the people and actual good governance from their government.

I get it—”good governance” might seem a contradiction in terms—but the FDA, at least when the government protected people for a while under Trump would be on those e. coli outbreaks and backtracking to a disease-ridden meatpacking plant in…the District of Columbia. The same source (elections officials, their elections management contractors, State and Federal officials all paid to look the other way) produces civic diarrhea all over the country.

Well, that’s my metaphor for the evening. Ground beef and diarrhea. Hope it helps.

So is this why “mail in votes” without creases were taken out from under tables and delivered to evacuated tabulation sites? If the ballot has no folds then the ballots aren’t disqualified?

Evidently all methods to cheat known to democrats were employed throughout the country on November 3 – and in the extended voting season preceding that date. The sheer number of schemes makes selling the steal a daunting task, but I’ll opine that the general public is considerably more receptive to hearing and comprehending a steal occurred than many would believe. The video we all watched is but one example. We all can point to others.

Hajjar is connected to John Silvestro, and to the CIA. It seems clear enough for me? Now look at the statement in bold below and underlined. Per the video above, they’re having problems reproducing the error. By any chance is the programming on the memory cards? By any chance did the CCTV cameras go off-line for more than an hour?

Hajjar also had a very bad opinion of election integrity activists. He told Dori Smith of a local radio program that questions about election integrity illustrated “how dangerous the Internet has become” and that many voting machine security reports were “superfluous”. He also defended LHS’s illegal activity of swapping out memory cards in the middle of elections, saying “I don’t pay attention to every little law”. In 2007, he attacked Brad Friedman as “full of shit”, his readers as “looney idealogues [sic]”, and New Hampshire election integrity activist Nancy Tobi as “clueless”.

A man who threatened to rig an election over an AES power plant, dismisses election integrity concerns, happily breaks election law, and personally attacks election integrity activists? Sounds like the perfect person to work at a voting machine distributor. Even better if he also has a record of trafficking cocaine during the period that the CIA was importing it to fund the Contras.

Link to Article

Nick Moseder and the folks he’s been working with in New Hampshire have been on this case hard. They have been doing all the work you’d expect from a competent AG or SOS, which of course we don’t have anywhere it seems. Even if you don’t normally watch YouTube, you should check him out and like/share the video. These findings are very damning, and many states may be impacted especially with this sneaky fold issue that invalidates your ballot! What was all that complaining about voter suppression from the Dems? Surely they will help get to the bottom of this since they’re so concerned about that.

The clever, conniving, myriad methods of cheating and rigging the election scream Long-Standing Voter Fraud gradually refined and optimized.

Why we are on the subject of ballot counts. I believe it’s of critical importance to do over the census counts in large cities. I believe Dr Franks could tell you why. The Phantom voters in cities. Detroit for example. Open secret, population count was keep high.

I am curious *why* that group of names is not aligned w/the names on the right hand side of the ballot as the others we can see are. If they had been then the bubble would not have been in the fold IMHO. Curious.

Could someone do the math and begin projections on how the 28% vote count data, that which is known, would influence the NH election outcome? Extrapolate to all counties using similar systems? Trump lost NH by about 7% . Yet Sununu cleaned up? Interesting. And Sununu says absolutely no way vote fraud occurred in NH? He seems pretty sure? So what do we call voter fraud these days? Strategic errors?
Where’s curious cat when we need him?

Our only hope is that the state and local governments do what is necessary to perform the audits necessary to reflect the legitimate vote. The only thing we can count on from the Federal government is more of the same and worse . This is what happens when there is no accountability.

Human error folks, just like in PA. Human error. The human error specifically aimed at assisting only on side of the ballot.

I wonder when CNN will start endlessly declaring the walls are closing in on the fraudsters? Or when MSNBC will ask over and over again if the fraudsters are feeling the pressure. Is the heat rising?

What other stupid metaphor can we throw at it to help solidify the thought in the lemmings’ heads?

Computers are great at number crunching…….. and they keep all the incriminating evidence…… absolutely wonderful!

looking at that ballot, only the race on the fold is staggered.

if the fold were on a race like shaheen’s, where every bubble is on the same line, every ballot would be an overvote. every mail in ballot would be rejected.

if the fold were on a borderline, no bubble would be miscounted. Every mail in ballot would be good.

but the staggered bubbles, where only one can be on a fold, where only one party would be harmed, only exist where there is a fold.

that is very troubling.

next, how do the ballots differ from place to place? Does the stagger always put a Democrat bubble on the fold? (Hurting Republicans). this may be from how the stagger is implemented, or from variations in how many people are in each race.

Say they alternate stagger. then the effect will alternate. and so forth.

Astro-physicist Fred Hoyle on people peddling Statistical Impossibilities: “It’s more likely a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.”
OK you people in New Hampshire get on all your relevant Local Officials and Elected Judges: It’s best to write from your heart but if you don’t have time here’s a chain letter-you can use:

Dears Sirs,

Election Integrity must be a requirement for a free society.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer want to take what were unusual, rushed voting practices in the middle of a pandemic last year and now make them permanent. That is the first bill they have introduced. They are trying to make vote-by-mail universal across the country, override 50 states’ election laws, eliminate not only photo identification but signature verification as well.

The Annual Harvard Election Integrity report has the USA ranked at 57 out of 58 developed countries for election integrity and security. The majority of European states do not allow mail-in ballots except for those living abroad because of the inherent opportunity of voter fraud. They also use voting machines with a paper ballot trail to be used in case of a recount as Senator Barrack Obama recommended in 2005.

As your constituent, I must urge you to do the right thing and refuse to accept universal mail-in balloting for the sake of fair and secure elections and instead push for a nationally required State government issued Photo ID to vote. Any State photo ID i.e., a drivers license should be acceptable however US government should also subsidize States to provide a free Voter Photo ID on request as to not violate SCOTUS rulings of a Voter Tax in regards to having to pay for an ID to vote.

Time is of the essence to pursue this goal.

Thank you for your immediate attention in this matter.

Cordially,

Outstanding video explanation!

Joe Biden was declared the New Hampshire winner by a margin on about 60,000 votes.

Are there enough “Folded Ballot Over votes” to overcome that margin?

https://edition.cnn.com/election/2020/results/state/new-hampshire

Only the mail-in ballots have folds, and only the folded ballots are read incorrectly. We know that Republicans tend to vote on election day, and therefore use unfolded ballots. Democrats tend to vote via mail and use folded ballots. Merrimack had three polling places, one of which is the City Office. The City Office would be the location where the mail-in (folded) ballots would be counted. I suspect that the three machines in Merrimack that showed high over-votes are located in the City Office.

To summarize, mail-in ballots would have a high over-vote, and be expected to have a high Democrat bias.

I am running this down. I’ll let you know.

If this turns out to be in fact how the election was stolen, it is quite clever. The plausible deniability is in the folding of the paper and the blame is placed on someone else. The liberals will sit around and say, “Oh you cannot realisticly say we planned this.” When in fact we know they did. This is clearly the case for no longer allowing electronic scanning machines. I also find it dubious that the machines in each district are in the same pattern which leans to a conspiracy. One worth a further investigation. Not in Jan 6 but Nov 3. Seems more and more plausible as we are seeing things emerging in all the audits.

This is a smoking gun! I consider this story as one of the most important research posts that has ever been put out to the treehouse.

Please watch the video that is here. The young man has laid out the best evidence of election theft I have seen so far. My hat goes off to that young man and the Patriots in New Hampshire that are fighting to get evidence to prove election theft.

This is the smoking gun we have prayed for. This has the potential to blow New Hampshire election of 2020 out of the water.

In response to  Sailor76 above here is Part One concerns:

Ken Eyring filed a RTK and temporary injunction request with the NH court on the Monday before the audit started. ( granitegrok DOT com/mg_windham/2021/05/temporary-injunction-and-rtk-request-filed-to-stop-the-windham-incident-forensic-audit )

“I filed the request because I’m concerned with the lack of checks and balances of the auditors, as well as the volatility of the forensic machine data that needs to be preserved. It is important to forensically image all of the data for each of Windham’s four AccuVote machines and I do not believe any of the current forensic teams have the necessary skill sets to adequately perform that specialized task.

I also filed a RTK request to protect the critical machine data that is stored in memory when the machines are powered down. That data is vulnerable to being lost if special care is not taken, because it will be flushed out of memory and lost when the machines are powered up. The RTK request should protect all of the data on the machines if the intent of the law is followed”

” The goal is to get copies of all the data from all of the machines and perform a forensic audit with an independent team that is outside of the umbrella of one organization (Verified Voting). There will be those who fight this request. Not because there is any justification to do so – nor harm that will come if it is approved. They will fight it just to fight it. And to that, I say keep on exposing who you are.”

As the Rob Ward comment states: “If nothing else this incident teaches us that every detail and facet of an agreement between the legislature/people and the Governor, SOS, AG and BOS needs to be written down. Just some simple language added to that which described the selection of the auditor would have prevented this betrayal by the SOS and BOS.”

In the Moesder interview ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3REvBPd89jw
 ) with Ken and Tom Murray (G&C: where other concerns will be more fully notated in Part Two below), Ken and Tom state that according to the experts with whom Ken had spoken (Col Phil Waldron and Russ Ramsland) that the data on the machines can be lost when the audit starts. (G&C: This aligns with the information given to the public by LHS that resulted in Windham being loaned 4 other machines for our local March 2021 election so that the locked up Nov. 2020 machines were not used, and the data would be preserved.)

In the above linked Nick Moseder interview Ken & Tom report on how they then physically went to the court on Tuesday morning and were told there would be no hearing, so they left to go to the audit (G&C: in another part of the state away from the court and Windham). They were then notified that there would be on online hearing. The problem was they were told there would not be one so they did NOT have their notes nor the expert witnesses available as they would have had if they were given the correct information that morning. Ken & Tom had the online court hearing in Tom’s truck. The judge ruled since Ken is not a computer expert, and did not have his expert witnesses available, Ken cannot say definitively the data will be destroyed, so the judge ruled against the temporary injunction.

Part 2 of Some Concerns notated from Moseder interview with Ken Eyring and Tom Murray in my above comment:
 – There are chain of custody problems as evidenced by blank spaces on the CoC forms, but the 2 witnesses signed!
 
 

 
 
– Also when the seal is broken, the card number is supposed to be notated, but it is not most of the time. Ken will be writing an article on GraniteGrok DOT com about the chain of custody problems soon.

– Questions of witnesses are put off until a later time, or in Ken’s case they were trying to not allow him to speak. Ken was SURROUNDED BY 4 MEMBERS OF THE AG OFFICE who were telling him he had to sit down, but he refused and spoke anyway. The AG’s office is NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PART OF THE AUDIT.

– Witnesses at the audit are 30 and more feet away so they could not see what’s going on.

– Ballots and machines go ‘off camera’. Ann Edwards said NH does not have resources for more than 4 cameras & limited bandwidth. Ken said he would buy them more cameras. They had to do an emergency upgrade. Ken said he had someone there to upgrade right then. There were 4 patriots streaming (G&C:not govt) who attended.

– The system is set up to be rebooted & goes down every 12 hours. 

– Why did 27 boxes appear mysteriously at the audit when the Windham Town Clerk signed and sent 23 boxes?
 
– The auditors (experts?) can’t figure how to at scan at 600dpi so they have to scan at 300 dpi.

– at 40:50 on video: all 4 machines are now aligned, but they were not aligned on election day. So the machines fixed themselves??? All approximate 1300 vote discrepancies occured only on machine 2. How did the machines fix themselves?  The auditors did not number the 4 machines the same way Windham numbers the machines. (G&C: Give me a break. There are only 4 machines, and they couldn’t even get that right?) Then the number 2 fell off the number 2 machine.
 
– at 44:07 The seals on the machines that prevent the memory card from being removed w/out being noticed that is on the back of the machines were not securely affixed and those tags are peeling up slightly.
 
G&C: These are some of the additional concerns of this “audit” I have notated. This “audit” IMHO is at best sloppily done, and just further brings into question the results of the Windham and NH election results. Since machine 2 had results that did not align with the hand count and better aligns with the “audit” for state rep, I believe since there were oddities in machine 2 for the Federal elections races, these races should be investigated as well.

Please note that LHS is the supplier, testing, and does upgrades of voting machines not only for 85% of NH, but for New England, so this is not just about a small town in NH. It is about at a minimum, the REGIONAL results.
 
In a phone conversation this morning with Ken Eyring (G&C: I was trying to one hand type & hold the phone so this is not a perfect direct quote). he stated – The machines are erroneous and not reliable. Other towns have anomalies. Audits of those towns may/should take place. We are the 1st in the nation primary, and we have to get it right. The AG’s office is not transparent. We need to make sure the process is transparent.
 
Ken has started the Government Integrity Project to deal not only specifically with NH, but also he & Tom Murray are setting up a process/template to be used in OTHER STATES. Please donate if you can to givesendgo DOT com/gip  There is also a volunteer sign up and a prayer section where prayers are greatly appreciated. They know not everyone can donate time or money, but prayers are powerful and there are many prayer warriors here! 😉 Thank You

I wonder how many of these disqualified over-votes were later adjudicated and determined to be democrat votes when they were actually republican?

Are there any links available that will direct us to video of NH Asst AG Anne Edwards in the secure area at midnight(ish) where the Wyndham audit is being held?

Well, I sent all three of those personages letters to urge them to seek a state wide forensic audit. Use to be all our elections were closed by precinct within states. Counts were delivered by phone for expediency but backed up with ballots secured in identifiable packs. There was no INTRANET that could be hooked up to WORLD WIDE WEB including CHINA. Most of the folks working voting precincts, if like the one I vote at, are old and have nothing else to do. They are volunteers and look forward to social interaction with neighbors and friends each voting season. They have no clue about the internet and do not want to know. They would not know if someone hooked up a computer to a machine that was live on the INTERNET if someone showed it to them. “Just one of those new fangled things those voting machine people have.”
I explained to the New Hampshire election folks that people elected in New Hampshire for Congress now affect the lives of myself and others here in Kentucky on a day to day basis. Whereas thirty years ago the only affect Congress had on us in other States was foreign relations, and interstate commerce. We really didn’t concern ourselves with anything but the Sheriff, his deputies and the guy that raised our property tax. Now, we never know what edict will befall us from above at the federal level causing our budgets to go wildly out of balance in one day!
I appealed to their power of office to assure the nation of free and fair elections by absolving in their State any questions of improprieties, or nefarious tampering to defraud either parties running for office. It would be in their best interest to show the rest of the nation that YOU believed your State able to hold free and fair elections and if there were EVER any questions they were willing to step up to he plate and by actively participating in any audit to prove or disclaim the questions the public might have.
Perhaps if everyone listening to this video sent letters or called them to urge their diligence in this matter we can help get this forensic audit across the nation. Otherwise, what will prevent this from happening each and everytime we hold elections. NOTHING.

Almost 7 months late now in hand counting votes?
I saw recently 50% of Republican voters believe Trump won election.
So roughly 25% of voters believe we have the wrong POTUS in Office and maybe, just maybe Nancy is not truly our Speaker of House?
You would think, if there were any honor anymore, those in Office would be demanding hand recounts.
It’s a YUGE problem when 25 percent don’t trust the election results.

Ok.

Some thoughts have occurred to me. The ballots are supposed to be folded in specific places. I’ll include an image of the ballot. The video says Windham borrowed folding machines from the DMV, but normally the ballots would be folded by hand. You can see the dotted lines in the margins are where the folds are supposed to occur, and you can see where St Laurent is located to see where the fold actually occurred.

Now heres the question:

Were the candidates strategically placed on the ballots or were the folds strategically placed to intentionally trigger an overvote?

<img></img>