Background – The people on the ground in Windham, New Hampshire, are doing an excellent job holding the election officials and auditors accountable to the people during this forensic ballot audit. The audit started because the tabulating machines (Dominion hardware and software) did not accurately count the votes from the physical ballots.
During the first small audit (recount) it was discovered that Republican votes were undercounted and Democrat candidates were overcounted. This anomaly was discovered during a hand recount of the ballots as compared to the electronic tabulation results.
After the first set of electronic tabulation results were discovered to be inaccurate the state authorized a full forensic audit. The full audit is ongoing; yesterday it was reported the second hand recount matched the first, which means the machine tabulation of those ballots was wrong.
The auditors wondered if folded ballots generated the problem. The test of folded -vs- unfolded ballots (counted by same machine) showed a high number of errors. The rate of error was a whopping 60%. That could mean the tabulation machines across all of New Hampshire may have this problem.
Washington Examiner – As many as 60% of ballots with machine-made or handmade folds were improperly counted by the town’s four scanning machines, Harri Hursti, one of three auditors selected for the process, told the New Hampshire Union Leader on Monday. “The error rate was way higher than we expected,” Hursti said.
[…] if someone voted for all four Republican candidates and the ballot happened to have its fold line going through St. Laurent’s target, then that might be interpreted by the machines as an overvote, which would then subtract votes from each of those four Republican candidates,” said Philip Stark, another member of the three-person audit team, according to a WMUR 9 report last week. “Conversely, if there were not four votes already in that contest by the voter, a fold line through that target could have caused the machine to interpret it as a vote for St. Laurent.” (read more)
WINDHAM:🚨 Close up look of Nov 3rd ballot!@WAuditors are currently forensically analyzing absentee ballots under a microscope.
An election official describes machines rejecting thousands of ballots during the election. @RealAmVoice pic.twitter.com/9NeT7wOoxq
— Heather Mullins (@TalkMullins) May 24, 2021
President Trump has responded:
New Hampshire’s Election Audit has revealed that large-scale voting machines appear to count NON-EXISTING VOTES. State and local communities are seeking confirmation. It’s probably true, but we’ll soon know. Why aren’t Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans doing anything about what went on in the 2020 Election? How can the Democrats be allowed to get away with this? It will go down as the Crime of the Century! Other States like Arizona, Georgia (where a Judge just granted a motion to unseal and inspect ballots from the 2020 Election), Michigan, Pennsylvania, and more to follow. (LINK)
The one thing that is absolute is the computers unique ability to be able to do everything accurately……. they are extremely good at counting numbers.
The unintended flip side is that change any one result and the computer will record it and keep that result for as long as it exists…….
The evidence of guilt is there….. and this forensic audit will uncover it……. but it is of lesser value without the culprits who should be as easy to expose.
Get one and offer that plea deal to get the head………………. thats the one we want!
Unfortunately this really isn’t true. With physical access to the machine a competent user can delete system log files, or just zero the drive completely, along with resetting the nvram on ICs that might have internal logging capabilities like IPMI chips. If a network was used then you will have logs on your network infrastructure devices, but that won’t tell you what happened on the local machine, and most remote traffic is encrypted these days so you’ll be looking at a lot of metadata.
Physical access is admin access. Always.
And hackers have never been successful with credential escalation…
well yes but…. somehow editing the sql server transaction log is a tricky to do without leaving fingerprints that a competent forensic expert/dba could not detect. Not saying that it couldn’t be done but. Also image backups, file backups, etc…. a nefarious actor would have nightmares worrying if all were gotten to….
Deleted files show evidence of intent. (A functioning DOJ would investigate this, but we don’t have a functioning DOJ.) However, deleted files can also be retrieved, as we’ve seen in recent election machine audits.
Unless these treasonous co-conspirators, who denied US citizens the peaceful transition of power codified under the US constitution via fair elections, decide to smash all the voting terminals with a hammer and bleach bit all the pieces, ala Hellary, I think we DO have a solid case for massive election fraud.
Of course, none of this changes the Jan 6 electoral votes cast by the state legislatures.
We do get bragging rights (whoop de do) and a very slight chance that all 50 states will voluntarily give up their fraudulent voting machines before our next elections.
I wouldn’t hold my breath.
why are people so concerned with the machines and whether they can be manipulated instead finding out who the people are that did the manipulating? could it be that people don’t want to know who those people are?
That’s a motive question.
A competent hacker can make attribution difficult. For example, let’s imagine a hack that originated in China or was transported through Chinese managed infrastructure. Think that can be traced back to the source? Doubtful. Requires other knowledge.
In 2016 Hillary&Co claimed that “The Russians hacked our elections!”
Which made no sense at all to me. How would that have been possible if machines were not connected to internet? Did HRC&Co know something ordinary Deplorables didn’t?
So either elections can be “hacked” or they can’t. Which is it?
There are ways of forensically recovering deleted files/over-written digits. All depends on method used to overwrite in the first place. The immediate objective is to establish that a statistically significant sample supports a conclusion that there were fraudulent voting practices (digital or otherwise) – thus calling into question the legitimacy of the vote. Attribution is a different matter.
Of course there may be no nefarious programming on the machines, only nefarious people taking advantage of a dysfunctional machine. How long would it take a dishonest election worker to notice that those 100 republican ballots were reported as 50 republican votes and 70 democrat votes? They then tell their comrades, “Hey, machine 2 is, the wink, wink, machine to use for mail in ballots.”. They can barely count to a hundred, much less stealthily program a computer, but they get the result they wanted.
And I have no doubt this happens in Democrat strongholds all over the country.
I just misread Democrat strongholds as Democrat strangleholds.
Or maybe it wasn’t actually a misread…
Same Same
… no doubt this happens in Democrat strongholds …
This is not just Dem’s. The globalists (transnational corporate crony capitalists seeking to become a planetary aristocracy) have owned both political parties for many decades. Don’t think for a second that they would not cheat in, for example, Republican primaries to remove a nationalist (Steve King) or keep one of their own in during a close race (Mitt Romney’s most recent Senate primary). Why would they have a tool and not use it when they thought the chance of getting caught was zero?
windham is not a democrat stronghold. neither is maricopa county. neither is antrim county.
IIRC antrim county audit began as a referendum recount on medical marijuana. Perhaps it’s more than representatives being manipulated.
what does that have to do with the fact that commenters here keep blaming democrats for what republicans are doing to stop these attempted audits?
Computer programs are only as good as the crooks that write the programs. These errors are by design. This is part of what these felons are hiding.
We used to call it GIGO….garbage in garbage out.
We still do. 🙂
That, and the fact that once their fraud is found and exposed, these Ca$h Cow$ die, and all the Big $$$ Contract$ with them.
Fraud makes all of their stupid little contract$ null and void.
The only thing a computer does accurately is base two math. And that is so far down in the guts that you never see it.
Beyond that, the main question is, “is the error small enough?”
Often, error checking routines have to be built in to memory and communications to prevent data loss.
But the biggest flaw, is that they do what they are told to do, not what you think they are told to do.
This thing they found in NH sounds like one of those issues. Having a fold crease in a ballot causes it to read inaccurately. And we folded all the mail ballots. Oops.
While they have shown that for this ballot, this error hurts Republicans and helps a Democrat, I have not heard yet if this error is a reasonable explanation of the results. Weren’t all Democrats helped?
An important error to fix, but is it being used to hide something else?
And were ballots designed with this feature in mind? (Note, every bug that is not fixed is designated a ‘feature.’ Hard to believe that nobody checked if it could read creased ballots. Vending machines still reject creased bills.)
Take a good look at the photo in the article. The Democrat names are printed off horizontal alignment so that the top one appears directly in line with the fold, not in line with the first Republican name next to it. Of course they were designed with this in mind.
Yeah, funny that. I’m sure it was just a mistake.
i noticed the same thing.
mail-in ballots have always been folded. you hit the nail on the head when you implied that this might be a distraction. the question is were the ballots counted correctly and if not what was the correct count and who is responsible for then not being counted correctly. i don’t think that people want to know to the last part of that question.
This thing they found in NH sounds like one of those issues. Having a fold crease in a ballot causes it to read inaccurately. And we folded all the mail ballots. Oops.
No oops. Problems like this are SUPPOSED to be found in quality control and testing. “Do not fold, spindle or mutilate” is an adage from the days of PUNCHCARDS. No rational reason to not be checking for it in QC.
What? Why yes, I am friends with the guy who always punches zeros into programs to make sure none of the calculations divide by it. Why do you ask?
And yes, that friend DID find precisely that problem in a POS system that hadn’t taken the possibility into account.
The Witch of Benghazi is a bit more slippery than to be caught this way.
We’re gonna need a bigger bucket of water.
Witch one ?
Crooked Hillary
Susan Rice
or
Valerie Jarrett ?
No point taking chances. Douse them all.
I’ve been in the software industry for 30 years, computers do not do “everything accurately.” A computer is only as accurate as the people and processes behind it.
On the physical level, scanning and OCR is one of those things that can give fuzzy results. A crease on the paper causes the scanner to the read reflected light in a slightly different way.
As have I (30+ years). The question then becomes, “Why would a software vendor or buyer certify accuracy or results if errors are so easily revealed?”
We already know the answer.
True, but to believe that all “errors” accrued to the benefit of Democrats defies credulity.
That is an example of systematic error, as opposed to random error. Systematic error means there is a bias in the measurement system. It does not PROVE fraud in and of itself, but it is highly suggestive.
Authorities actually interested in accurate vote counts would be all over this doing a full, open, and public system analysis to find the reason for the systematic error and a way to permanently correct it. That this is not happening is another example of the staggering corruption of ‘our’ political class.
marxist/globalist rule = no legitimacy
Now they need to look to see who’s names were on the ballot in the predictable places where there would be a fold. Perhaps they just ‘happen’ to all be Republicans.
were democrats in charge in windham? my understanding is that it is heavily republican. correct me if i’m wrong.
You could waterboard with coca cola the chief architect of vote-scamming, he could spill all the beans in details that outdo the best audits, and there would still be no movement in the national leadership to alter the voting processes.
Why would they lift a finger? No different than if the defense obtained the playbook from the offense. The offense is still going to play to win.
A better question would be: Why do we expect the despots who installed themselves to power via fraudulent means, to ever relinquish that power?
Do we really think they will permit voters to vote them out in fair elections? With all their graft and corruption, they need to guard that DC henhouse with their lives and will never leave it unattended, lest they all “hang by nooses.” Thanks for nothing, Barr.
These swamprat frauds are untouchable by a complicit DOJ, and so there is nothing that compels them to stop their widespread fraud. This widespread fraud is a national security issue that leaves the USA wide open to enemy combatants within our own government.
Math is of God, numbers are of God, they are truth and cannot be false. That IMO is huge. I see His hand here.
All the Hebrew alphabet represents numbers and Hebrew was said to be the language of heaven, I personally believe that to be a partial truth. I believe it was based on the language of heaven, or maybe just the highest of heaven but letters were not included, again my opinion. Why?
Letters are not perfect numbers are. Very precise and cannot be anything but what they are. No matter your tone or pronunciation.
How many ways can you express letters? Meaning can be added or subtracted as numbers are added and subtracted.
Our computers language is all ones and zeros. That is a basis of higher knowledge, we discovered, did not create. A failsafe design by God as all his creations have.
I also see it very obvious the hand of the enemy appear. When there is a war against math from the left. Gates himself has taken on the absolutes of math and said they are racist. The tool of our enemy is these racial divisions.
Any education is embedded with their lies now. Why not Go back to Gods word.
In a just nation of laws, these issues would be obvious and prosecuted. We will see?
We all are in this ballgame, the very votes that are cast in the wastebasket are our country and our future.
Every single decision becomes more obvious and important. This nation is looking for a foundation to stand on as we descend.
When you speak of ‘God’ many people turn off their intellect and stop listening, but God is woven into everything. If you don’t see that you are not looking.
It will become more and more apparent as we move along this path.
God bless you absolutely true statement, thank you.
Mike Lindell’s Team already has them.
Look at the ballot – why would the candidates for State Representatives not be across from one another, instead of spaced as they are? Would Dominion be ‘crafty’ enough to actually put St. Laurent’s name in a place where a fold WOULD occur? I believe so (the same way you will notice that the + on other ballots were offset to force adjudication. Looking forward to the discovery in the Dominion lawsuit against Sidney Powell. I hope that she totally destroys this corrupt company. As Trump said at the end of his first term, dealing with election fraud – which has been going on in our country for decades – was the most important thing that he was going to do. More and more people are finally waking up to this fraud.
From the thread where the video came.
AdamAnt
@AdamN1988
·
6h
Replying to
@TalkMullins
@WAuditors
and@RealAmVoice
Anyone else notice that every other race where a Democrat and Republican line is listed is perfectly inline, whereas the St Laurent is offset downwards just enough to be under the fold? Seems almost intentional.
Would Dominion be ‘crafty’ enough to actually put St. Laurent’s name in a place where a fold WOULD occur?
Actually it would not be Dominion in this case – the perpetrator would be the printer of the ballots working with Dominion reps and corrupt local officials.
What leaps to mind is the testimony of election observers in AZ who reported that the local election officials were seen completely deferring to the Dominion “advisers” who were actually running the entire election process.
Did Dominion select/hire the ballot printers? What about ballots printed in the CCP of which we have seen physical pictures of palettes full?
The printing angle of the crime may yet reveal even more perfidy, and has been somewhat neglected in the citizen investigation of the corrupt software –
so far!!
You bring up a good point. In order to pull this off there had to be large numbers of people involve on many levels. That is why the democrats and MSM are so adamite there was no fraud and anybody that questioned the election was a conspiracy nut. Start pulling on any loose thread and the whole scheme comes unraveled. There are probably a whole lot of low level people involved who weren’t paid off but were low IQ, young liberals who thought they hated Trump and were convinced to go along on the bases that 2020 was a desperate time and Trump had to be gotten rid of regardless of what it took and they were saving the country for socialism. These same people when faced with jail time and after seeing 4 months of the Biden disaster will fold quickly and turn states evidence to save their own hides. The Democrat leadership has to know this and also know the trail of evidence will lead to them. That would explain their actions and why the Propagandist in the MSM are working so hard to suppress the news of the Audits. As the election fraud starts to fall apart expect the Democrats to become much more dangerous as they get more fearful and desperate.
who were those election officials in maricopa, were they democrats or were they republicans?
how can people be so easily distracted by things like the fold. all that matters is that if you run 20 ballots thru the machine and 12 of those ballots were for candidate a and 8 were for candidate b the result should be
candidate a 12 votes
candidate b 8 votes
not
candidate a 14 votes
candidate b 6 votes
if the machines incorrectly tabulated the votes the elected needs to be voided.
At first I thought you were trying to blame this on R’s (my thinking it matters not who cheated but both were involved) but I now see your point.
Spot on.
Technically the typesetter. These days most printers don’t actually set type. They just get electronic files and generate the impressions.
But yes, that could EASILY be Dominion. Or a flunky in the Office of the Secretary of State.
Ballot design ‘used to be’ done at the local level.
Not aware that Dominion has any input into the recent ballot designs. Maybe, but I have never heard that in Georgia.
If you’re following in Maricopa, it was found that the ‘+’ in the registered Republican ballots were outside of the appropriate box for scanning, while the Dem ballot had the + in the proper place. With the + out of place, those ballots had to be adjudicated, as the machines couldn’t read them. How likely is it, that only registered Republicans were affected????
I think that the Florida Butterfly Ballot debacle in Gore v Bush was instructive for Dems. Gore would have won if oldies had been able to read the ballot properly. Instead, they (Jewish voters)voted for Pat Buchanan (conservative Christian).
I still think of how one person’s ballot design, in some ways, changed the world. I guess I haven’t been the only one.
But these people who listened to their instructions can count…
“Vote for number two”!!
That is so interesting!
And I had never heard of it before.
Here is a link:
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/butterfly-did-it-aberrant-vote-buchanan-palm-beach-county-florida
This is the point Peter Navarro makes…. its not count its the canvass.
“…dealing with election fraud…was the most important thing that he was going to do.” trump said that in 2016, he did nothing about it. why won’t anybody ask him why?
Because the MSM would just chastise him. Why do you doubt his stance?
Trump said that at the end of his term in 2019, IIRC. It was not something that he could do at a federal level. However, look at all the investigations going on at the state level currently, as well as more and more people’s awareness of how our election system is corrupt. I think that he actually HAS done something about it.
He tried. He put together a commission. Demoncrats sued, and corrupt judges found for the Demoncrats.
Look, I’m not a fan of Trump the man. Trump the man still strikes me as a narcissistic braggart. Yes he has noteworthy accomplishments, but to me he puffs himself up a bit too much for them.
But Trump the President I respect. I’ve always been a big fan of The Gipper, always will be. He saved the country from the malaise that was Jimmy the nuclear peanut farmer Carter. Much as I don’t like to admit it, on a fair number of issues Trump was a better Reagan than Reagan was: Immigration, Judges, the Middle East, and putting Americans, especially historically disadvantaged Americans, back to work.
There is only so much one man could do in four years. Especially a man who was there pretty much on HIS OWN, because McTurtle and the rest of the RINOs sure seemed to hate him even more than the Demoncrats did for at least those first two years. Given that, I’ve been suspicious of their alleged support over the last 2 years.
Good catch. Having done some electronic typesetting back in the day that looks to me like an extra blank line to move the spacing. As a blank, you can tweak the leading (spacing) of the line to move the line which follows.
Although in all honesty, this looks to me like a Word Tables document.
Does anyone recall the computer acronym from the 1970’s-80’s GIGO ?
This mania about how the computers cannot be wrong, or at least not very wrong, forgets that fallible and lying Human Beings control the computers. The computers are simply tools of human beings at work…or human beings up to no good!
Garbage In, Garbage Out!
You beat me to it. I just posted the very same thing. I remember GIGO well in my old programming days. I doubt young folks today know anything about Fortran, Cobol, RPG, Assembly Language, Basic, etc. Many of the subroutines we take for granted today were all developed using the old programming languages of yesteryear.
old engineer: sit at my feet children and I will AMAZE you with our old ways…”
My son call the NY Public Library Desk Reference an “artifact.”
Last quote in the linked news article Rep . Gov . Says 300 vote problem out of 800,000 not fraud . Wait one minute !, what a a phony , it was 400 votes were changed on recount (Rep plus 300 , Dem minus 100) out of 30,000 cast in this one town , OVER 10% error . As a sampling it is significant and he knows it that is why he moved the goal posts .
Put another way , if Dem who came in 5th and lost by 50 votes or so (and wanted recount that showed these errors ) had WON by 50 votes we would never had known this and would have been elected by “ mistake” / computer error , yea right, so…..
Sorry bad math 1% error ( too early) , but 2nd comment still pertains
A 1% error in places where the occupier “won” by about 15,ooo votes would be huge on a 1,500,000 vote area (which is 1%).
True, just enough to be below the radar , but enough to make a difference …
Off topic, kinda, but what is the Covid mortality rate for most people who aren’t seniors or high risk? Our country is shut down for insignificant percentages?
In Connecticut from March 2020 to May 20, 2021 with 346,000 cases , mortality for under 50 was less than 1%, only 194 fatalities listed for ages under 50 (CT population 3.5 million) for those 14 months . For total under 60 it was 637 . BUT the instilled PANICKED FEAR of mortality for those under 50 was over 115%.
Funny how those numbers always work against us? Pennsylvania… We thought it was more free than NJ when we moved here and we’ve been locked down worse bc Wolf has no fear of recall and GOP machine is openly RINO.
I think the mortality rate was the shiny thing to distract us when they thought it was going to be high. The more fundamental problem, as evident in Italy was the lack of bed capacity in hospitals.
Yes, some of this was from their self-imposed spacing rules, but it was a real problem. BUT if you say that was the problem instead of the mortality rate, the people are likely to ask “Why aren’t there more hospital beds available? Especially in light of Universal Healthcare?” And that’s a question they REALLY DON’T want us digging into.
Error rate shall be no greater than .0008%.
Yes! Isn’t that the percentage that the Federal Election Commission supposedly mandates?
Adjudication by nameless, faceless adjudicators is what changed this election over to Biden……..the dRats just needed to know how many votes they needed to make up. Who are these people, who are their managers, where are the paper and electronic adjudication folders and log files. Every single voting machine, tabulators and all personal and state issue electronic device, emails, messenger accounts, passwords should be handed over to state auditors….including for SOS, election committees, mayors, Governors, dRats and know RINOs.
Funny thing how this only affected REPUBLICAN votes….all the time…EVERYWHERE you look…must be a cooinkydink…yeah, thats it…..a cooinkydink….
If errors were truly random, they would be more evenly distributed.
Can you imagine if we had real leader ship that would stand up and demand a recount every time there was Error found. Until somebody goes to jail for a long time this is not going to change.
We DO have real leadership; they are leading against us.
I wish that the people who are trying to explain the tabulation errors were able to express themselves more clearly, and without making any assumptions about what the reader knows about the ballots. This seems to be a problem common to ALL of them.
Hint:
DROP the “Election. Speak” and explain yourselves with common everyday English.
I was a poll worker for a few elections. In Kentucky that made me a sworn officer for the state, not just someone hanging out at the polls. We received our ballots on pads. We had instructions that if an ballot got damaged or wrinkled that it had to be “spoiled” and the voter would have to redo the ballot. The spoiled ballot was put in a sealed container for destruction. We watched to make certain that the ballot fed into the machine was flat and not wrinkled. We could not touch the ballot or see the votes, only observe the process.
So, they pre-wrinkled the ballots and that is OK? They let poll workers scan and correct and that is OK?
From what I understand, the error was found on the absentee “mail-in” ballots that were machine-folded prior to being stuffed in the envelope to be mailed to the voter.
“WE” precinct poll workers in Georgia, didn’t have access to see the ‘absentee ballot’ process that was done at the county supervisors office. Most of the issues with the folds appear to be absentee ballot related, not in person voting.
+Agree with you on the ‘in person’ precinct voting process. Same as in Georiga.
The big dispute in the PA vote arose from large number of mail-in ballots that were counted, and questions about their validity.
What everyone wanted to know: Were those mail-in ballots cast by legitimate voters, or were they requested and cast in a wholesale manner by identity thieves seeking to tilt the election in Biden’s favor?
Problem is, we’ll never know.
Because of “Secret Ballot” protocols, once the ballots are separated from their envelopes, there’s NO WAY to reunite them.
Sure, we can try to verify envelope signatures against the voting roles, and determine if any significant fraud (of this type) occurred, but we’ll never be able to quantify how many fraudulent votes went to which candidate.
Well, there’s the matter of the counts that are turning up a whole lot more ballots than matching envelopes. Hundreds of thousands.
I think PA was one of the worst examples of this, or it may be GA – or both!
Philly …… corruption
Not just Philly
So let’s say that 20% of the signatures aren’t even close, and the mail ballots break 80% for one candidate and 20% for the other. Throw out 20% of them using that 80/20 split – then what happens to the result?
I’m sorry, it matters not whom the vote went to if 5 are envelopes with forged signatures. It doesn’t because fraud is fraud. That shows fraud.
This is not about getting Trump in. It’s about legitimate votes.
The Bucks County election is where I would look bc we supposedly pushed Trump to win 2016 and there was little visible support. 2020 we had 2 hour lines, flags, road rallies but Biden won?? Doubt it. Not much notice here bc we are next to Montgomery county with Philly, I’ll never believe Trump lost Bucks County.
Mitch and the Repubs doing anything??? What a joke.
Not unless his wife divorces him.
If the entire ballot was rejected what is the chance that some House and Senate races that were also fraudulent. While it will take longer to audit enough state to prove that the federal election was fraudulent, is there a chance that enough fraudulent Congressional elections were fraudulent to flip the House or Senate to Republican control?
I can’t recall an example where an election was overturned because of fraud. Would the fraudulently elected person stay in office until the next election, would the seat be vacated and the correct winner take the seat, or would the Governor be able to call a special election?
I think this is why so few Republicans want to touch the election fraud issue. This “problem” probably goes back years. I put it around 2004 when we started seeing more electronic voting machines and “mail in” voting in the years that followed.
A lot of this goes back to Bush v Gore and the hanging chads.
Anyway, I think the Republicans know that pulling on this thread will reveal that we’ve had bogus elections going on 20 years now.
Nobody knows how to resolve it, and they know there would be massive civil unrest. So, they all lock shields with the Democrats and accuse us of undermining (non-existent) election integrity.
It’s a bit like how if you thought invading Iraq in 2003 was a bad idea, you weren’t “supporting the troops”.
New Jersey – recent case. Fraudulent ballot stufffing. Judge disqualified the entire race and ordered a revote.
And yes, I know that while there is no constitutional mechanism for the President, there is for all local races. These are just as important. One would assume the House and Senate races are also able to be ‘cancelled’ but would need to do a search thru history to see if that has ever happened.
The New Jersey case was for the Paterson City Council Seat. Plenty of articles about the ballot stuffing.
The state races are very important, but only so much as there are bonafide change candidates (not RINO posers) running for office. The past four years I saw little evidence of that. The presidential race practically stood alone in MAGA principles.
In all of DC, there was only one true American patriot, and that was President Donald Trump.
In NY for example, virtually all of the candidates on the ballot ran under every party designation with the exception of the occasional libertarian. By dispensing with/ blurring party affiliations altogether, these candidates basically flaunt their UNiparty creds.
Sure enough:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/08/20/politics/paterson-new-jersey-city-council-voter-fraud/index.html
Check out the Heritage Foundation Voter Fraud Database. Problem is, Heritage is part of the Rino swamp.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search?combine=&state=All&year=&case_type=All&fraud_type=24497&page=1
Every state should be doing this. Rinos were in n on this fraud. McConnell and McCarthy and Pence at the top.
I wonder if we could encourage some Democrats to start looking into the McConnel and McCarthy races out of spite?
Already did…
The democrats would have us all believe that all the “accidental” election errors just happened to help democrats across the board.
Yup. Not errors – design features.
The scanner software can recognize a fold. The software used to layout he ballots knows where machine folds will be and whether or to put the candidate on a fold line. . The vote tabulation software can be programmed to recognize any combination of the situations, deem any combination as an “error” and adjust the vote.
Suspicious Norwegian Cat here: this seems very sketchy. Folded votes? If that narrativ is upheld – well, then no organised voter fraud on a grand scale. It was the fold lines – stupid.
I’ve not read this anywhere, but correct me if there’s an article somewhere…
So, let’s say these audits in various places show that Trump would actually have been elected had the fraud not taken place. WHAT THEN?
We don’t know. Uncharted territory.
Seatbelt buckling recommended, it’s gonna be a bumpy ride.
Uncharted territory. There is no constitutional mechanism.
States/State Governors will have to be involved in some way, since they ‘certified’ their vote.
Beyond that, no one knows.
We do whatever it takes to keep America bottom line!!!
The local news outlets are keeping us divided just in case.
Why not start with a purple heart, presidential medal of freedom and state funeral for Ashli Babbit and take it from there
What SHOULD happen is the rightfully elected president is installed accordingly. Only other acceptable option is a new election with paper ballots – no computers allowed anywhere, any time – and the military (I believe Flynn will know which ones to choose) at every single precinct and as many observers as we can get looking over everything. We cannot allow an illegitimate president and administration to stay in office once voter fraud is verified.
Well, what happens in other countries is there is another election. The election would be consider null and Nancy P takes over, unless the congress elections are also over turned, then any questioned election would require a new election. In theory, congress could only be run by people considered legit elected. It would also me that several Senate seats are up in the air too.
Really have to look at it state by state. Dems might have to consider throwing in the towel or they lose both the Senate and the house. The fight is just beginning.
New Hampshire law:
TITLE LXIII
ELECTIONS
CHAPTER 656
PREPARATION OF VOTING MATERIALS
https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/lxiii/656/656-mrg.htm?id=8589992026
I also found this on when and how many ballots were ordered and issued.
NH Primary Source: More than 1 million ballots printed, ready for NH general election
Secretary of State says 482,850 absentee ballots will have been delivered to city, town clerks by Friday
by John DiStaso
24 Sep2020
https://www.wmur.com/article/nh-primary-source-more-than-1-million-ballots-printed-ready-for-nh-general-election/34136913
https://www.windhamnh.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7405/11032020-General-Election-Results
The 60% error rate? Looking at the bottom of the page indicating the total number of ballots cast in Windham.
Regular ballots 6977
Absentee ballots 3029 (I think these would be the only ballots folded.)
Total ballots. 10006
If the 3029 are the only ballots by mail ..they would be folded..they would likely fall into the 60% error rate and be adjudicated.
.60 x 3029 = 1817 to be adjudicated. They say minimum time to adjudicate a ballot is 2 per minute. 1817 ÷2 = 909 minutes to adjudicate the ballots. Just to adjudicate that number of ballots is 15.15 work hours (Two people doing the screening). Who and how many people did the adjudication? Is there a record of how long it took?
An adjudication rate of 60% on the Windham overall total—10006–would take 50 work hours to adjudicate.
Statewide rate at 60% would be another animal of larger magnitude altogether.
so?
Now you are getting it.
Too many ballots sent to adjudication and “adjudicated” way too fast.
“That could mean the tabulation machines across all of New Hampshire may have this problem.”
And what other states which also use this brand of machine? And what does this say about the quality of the TESTING of these machines by the manufacturer. Never tried any folded ballots in them?
Add this to the decades of videos from the left, right, and center showing how insecure fully electronic voting machines are and how state and county warehouses containing them have been found completely unguarded and you couldn’t be blamed for thinking that election outcomes simply cannot be trusted.
These fraudulent machines are seeded inside key districts in every state. Getting all the commie states to agree to purge them would be quite a feat. These machines give them ultimate power and control. Who will force their hand if the state offices are all corrupted?
if you want to know some answers to those questions look up russ ramsland on you tube. there is no security on dominion machines. why won’t someone question the state leaders why they are using these machines.
Carnac sees an election do-over in New Hampshire’s future.
HEY OHHHH !!
The Government will get away with whatever the people allow them to.
We’re gonna need to start recruiting volunteers for accountability.
And then people wonder why i wish for a giant and world wide EMP
Considering how many people’s lives depend on technology – basically any medical intervention – not to mention livelihoods, that’s wishing for complete apocalypse.
What’s frustration is nothings going to happen still. Biden won by fraud, he is still in, nothing will change. So, we prove it was fraud. The world turns as a liberal commie world. America just had 4 years reversed in 150 days by an imposter. So, we wait and vote again for midterm elections when they’ll cheat a different way. Nothing is going to come of this proof. That’s the intolerable result. Infuriating!
“win by fraud” – that’s ridiculous.
By the standards we have used to judge foreign elections for decades, that’s not only not “ridiculous”, it is the most probable thing.
Go look up how we judge foreign elections, how we declare fraud, what standards we use. Then apply those methods to the US 2020 election.
OK we know they’re cheating and it seems wherever they look under the rock and re-count the votes there was cheating in every state. I believe the way out of this mess is to hold the Republican leader ship accountable. I hope every voter calls his congress representative and senate representative that we want to change the leader ship of the republican party because they do not fight for us. That is the main issue that I will hold you accountable if you don’t vote to change the leader ship. Side note that includes your representative to believe and vote America first only on all issues.
Don’t give money to the rnc but give to individual candidates that believe in America first.
It seems the biggest problem the Republicans have is the leader ship does not respond yes they point out the Democrats do this in the Democrats do that but they don’t do a damn thing. So unless we change the leader ship nothing will change.
60% error rate is COMPLETELY unacceptable. Void the election results there.
Notice in the video that the Democrat and Republican candidates’ names + ovals are directly across from each other until you see the last category. Note that St. Laurant and the other democrats are one ‘step’ down. And that’s right where the fold would be, as was shown.
You all need to watch this. Although some of this is AZ related, it is also ALL ABOUT how the machines read the ballots, who is involved in printing, adjudications, and so much more than applies all across the country.
AZ Ballot Printing Company “Runbeck” Causing 11%+ ERROR RATE!
by The Professor’s Record with David K. Clements
Published May 19, 2021
In this interview I interview patriot Dan Sundin over his findings on the company “Runbeck.” Maricopa Voters—-we have a problem.
https://rumble.com/vhbebf-az-ballot-printing-company-runbeck-causing-11-error-rate.html
BTW, this is the most stupid arrangement I have heard so far. I remember when this lady testified in AZ too.
It seems to me that all we have heard so far is that these WAY OVERPRICED EVIL MACHINES and the people you have to buy to be able to use them are not costing less $$$, but more, and are causing all sorts of problems, known and unknown, that raise the price even higher.
I’d like to see someone try to gather up all the costs involved, divided by ballots tabulated, to see what the cost per ballot is.
I wanted to know if Jeffie from LHS got paid by the hour to sit in the NH “audit” room, and if so, who paid him?
5th graders, given one month could come up with a more efficient, accurate voting process than this AND guarantee it thru had recount AND would be less costly as well.
This would take days and not months.
Now ask yourself why are the people of New Hampshire paying millions for a system which is not accurate? AND does not automatically audit same in days?
We all know they cheated. We knew it even before election night when they illegally changed several state’s individual voting laws. The question is, what are they gonna do about it?
People might as well get it in their heads that the left and their media allies will fight tooth and nail against overturning the 2020 election and they don’t give a damn about collateral damage. Meanwhile, even if they take control of the House and Senate in the next election, the GOP will not fight anywhere near as hard for us, if at all. They gave Obama pretty much everything he wanted, after they all ran against his policies. What evidence is there that the GOP has learned anything from Trump other than how to use his name to raise money?
The right question is
What are you going to do about it?
When the audits are done and the proof presented every citizen will have to decide whether they are patriots, communist or cowards and act accordingly.
What exactly does that mean? Do you want to go to war? Are you going to attack a mechanized Army brigade with AR-15’s? What’s your plan, exactly? If you’re going to talk big, you damn well better back it up.
“Why aren’t Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans doing anything about what went on in the 2020 Election?”
That’s a rhetorical question from the POTUS, right?
My strong suspicion is that Mitch McConnell is both aware of this and is a beneficiary of the scheme.
Too many elected Republicans care not one whit about this country so long as their re-election / lobbying pipeline is secure.
Mitch is a huge roadblock to any progress being made with justice for the stolen election of 2020. Mitch was and is all in on doing everything possible to help the Globalists win and MAGA lose.
Well, it has been 6 1/2 months since the Democraps stole the Presidential and many other elections. In all this time, we are finally getting a forensic examination of the ballots and the machine counting in a tiny community in New Hampshire. Damn, this is real progress ! At this rate, the 2022 election will have been stolen before we can finish evaluating what was done in 2018 and 2020. Don’t bet the farm on the outcome of this, either. This country has been completely corrupted by its political class. They cannot be ignored because they have seized control of too much of our lives over the last 35 years. They will all have to be voted out, and that was an attempt at humor about this.
After they finish up there…. Audit the REST of OUR Country !
Then Audit the FED !
and while they are doing that find out where all of the GOLD in Ft. Knox disappeared to and HANG those Crooks too !
Abolish electronic voting.
i have two questions;
one if windham is such a heavy republican area how did people get chosen to do the audit that need to be audit themselves?
two why do people think the miscounts are caused by folds instead of crooked tabulators?
i smell the stench of the rnc
I owned a survey company that used this kind of technology. If the scanner is so sensitive as to detect a fold it calibrated wrong. Period.
Doesn’t this mean they haven’t found an error on the Presidential votes?
Wouldn’t it be something if Nancy’s Congress is illegitimate?
Can’t imagine anything put forth by Dems would be enforceable.
What a mess!!!
All because common sense left the voting process (including audits). 5th graders could develop a better system in a very short time.
Any comments on this by that Pence guy?
Follow The $$$
How many of these goons are invested in the Pharma industry, the masking industry, and any of the overall product industries that sprung up because of the China Bio-Terrorism Virus ScamDemic?
Did their businesses, including fakebook and Instagram, profit off the SCamDemic?
Now ask that same question about all the rest who have silenced voices over the ScamDemic.
I’ve read a good number of comments.
While I smell something fishy here all of the evidence is not in yet.
I spent most of my adult life working as an auditor and fraud examiner. One thing I know from experience is that when you have anomalies (errors) of any sort you start checking to see the nature of each anomaly. Then you move to the next step which is to quantify the errors and determine their impact.
This is a simplistic view but I hope it illustrates that it takes time to work through the process and finalize the results.
While I have a range of experiences, I never conducted an examination of any voting system and the processes that support those systems.
I hope that the auditors/examiners are able to finish their work without interference from elected officials, public employees, and the MSM. In addition, I hope that they will the work will produce a result that can stand up to a whole bunch of scrutiny because it’s coming from all sides.
They put the DIM on the fold so it would always be counted as #2 out of the 4 options allowed. It came 2nd. Then, if you are a Republican and voted for all 4 R people, that is a total of 5. That is an overvote. Kick that baby into adjudication.
In adjudication I can do anything I want with that ballot. The fact that it was R leaning, even better. It is mine to fill out however I want, or to trash, and let the foreign actor cleanup crew vote it for us.
Let the games begin!
Ballot dives matter
When I voted I specifically stated I did not trust the machines. Within minutes a techie type magically appeared who approached me and reassured me the voting machine was verified by him personally. He would not answer the fol:
State -> VA.
One weakness for the owners of the voting process in many states is that it appears they cannot prove integrity of the process E2E.
In other words, only Republicans folded their vote.