There are only a few instances where a party can file a direct lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, a state claiming harm by another state is one of those instances.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit [pdf here] with the supreme court seeking and emergency injunction against Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”
The Texas AG argues that arbitrary changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
The lawsuit states: “these non-legislative changes … facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.” […] “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”
Paxton notes the intent of the states may have been changes in good faith, due to COVID-19 mitigation efforts; however, the end result of the changes is in direct violation to the Constitution and therefore creates the harm.
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting.” […] “The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States.”
Here’s the full Lawsuit as filed:
From my local Rep:
“Please contact your state’s attorney general and ask that they join the Texas lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court of the United States to protect the rest of us from the election corruption in GA, MI, PA, and WI.
Whether you are in Montana or North Dakota or South Dakota or Iowa or any state with a Republican Attorney General contact your AG and ask them to join the Texas lawsuit. If you know folks in other states ask them to contact their AG to join this lawsuit.”
I just did with the state of Florida. Any other Floridians need to cram their phone lines and email with requests for this. Also tell them they need to end this Communistic mask mandates from their officials. I feel like I am in China. I’m sick of looking at these people in masks. I have never worn one and never will. I just walk right in and no one says a thing. More Americans really need to stop this by refusing to wear one.
Florida is in,also read other red southern signed on.
I read that Louisiana has signed on to the suit.
Wear your mask.
Already done with Alan Wilson in SC.
This is going to be the most effective thing an individual can do.
You will need to describe the harm done to yourself. For this, look carefully at the lawsuit.
Quote “One man, one vote”, from the SCOTUS “Reynolds decision”.
Louisiana AG is joining the lawsuit.
https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/12/08/landry-louisiana-is-joining-texas-2020-election-lawsuit/
Thank goodness! I’ve been praying that Jeff Landry would join Texas. He has done much more to support Trump in this election debacle than our 2 Senators and Scalise combined.
As far as the political/legitimacy argument with respect to taking up one of these cases, and taking up a case after the “safe harbor” “deadline” – if any of these justices have ANY sense of self-awareness whatsoever – the HAVE to realize we’re already well down that road when Boockvar and Pennsylvania officials lied to the court about quarantining mail in ballots pending further proceedings, then immediately went out and did the opposite of what they said.
Wish Jay Sekulow would chime in on the PA case. Nothing on his Twitter about it.
I think they’re waiting on the SCOTUS to decide whether or not to accept the TX case. If we don’t hear anything tonight, Sekulow might weigh in on it. But I don’t get the sense, based on his radio shows the last 2 days, that he expected PA’s case to get denied.
Jenna Ellis tweeted about the Pa. case an hour ago. She said the media has it wrong. The Pa. case which is the Kelly/Parnell case is still pending before the SC. They only denied the emergency injunctive relief. Don’t know how to post the tweet.
IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert.
@MikeKellyPA ’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Scotus put it on the Docket.
hope Jay has not been pushed to the side.like him better then Cruse before supremes.
Jay Sekulow- “At the ACLJ, we have been fighting to defend the integrity of the election and the Constitution, and if the Supreme Court takes up this case, we will look to file our own amicus brief along with our members.”
This is Paxton’s case, he filed it. President’s team may enjoin
Here you go. The ACLJ has a Rumble channel. I’m watching it now.
https://rumble.com/vbosv1-this-is-the-one-the-case-weve-been-waiting-for.html
Jenna Ellis tweeted at 5:24 ET: IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT: The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert. @MikeKellyPA’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.https://supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
I would love to see independent outlets like Lookner to start covering some of this stuff. Even the legal challenges that are failing to reach SCOTUS. This is American history in the making, whether or not CNN would like to pretend it’s not happening.
We’ve seen this before. For months, the House had its shampeachment hearings in a SCIF, and medias only coverage was spin.
Then, it got to Senate, and media HAD to cover it. Media will be forced to cover this, once SCOTUS seriously focuses in on a case, that can “effect the outcome of the election”.
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state. Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.
Read where 4 more joined them but couldn’t find which additional 4 states.
I wish Tennessee would join!
I just emailed my TN state rep asking him why the hell our attorney general is not on this pronto!!
I emailed Governor and Attorney General of TN this afternoon as well. Be very disappointed if TN doesn’t join.
Appreciate the update. We are watching capital H history in real time. Amazing, and what better folks to watch it with than Treepers.
I haven’t been able to find this. Do you have a link with this info?
Found one for Louisiana: https://thehayride.com/2020/12/landry-louisiana-is-joining-texas-2020-election-lawsuit/
Do we have a link?
I’m confused; watched Lou Dobbs and he and Victor Davis Hansen both sounded like we can forget the SCOTUS giving any relief in the election fraud. Is it really all but over?
Was this today? Do you have a link?
VDH usually right.
He’s also right that the institutions we were taught as kids would seek justice are actually those trying their best to ignore the worst offenses, including the theft of a Presidential election in full sight of everyone.
The Viet Nam War forever changed the way youth looked at authority.
Since then, the disillusionment of youth has, for good reason, spread to the average American.
This takes the cake.
Scotus will find a reason to ignore all this because Roberts has set such a low bar, because there don’t appear to be fighters on the Court, and because most of the justices are fearful.
How so? You don’t really think that they don’t PERSONALLY fear the Left and the thug Antifa, BLM, and the regular ole doxxing that takes place on twitter, do you?
Most of them are NOT men and women for all seasons.
Thomas and Alito are the only ones I trust and perhaps, down the road, Barrett. Too soon to know about her.
I dont have link but his (lou dobbs) show is on again in 16 mins on fox business net. Heres website .foxbusiness.com/shows
I saw it. Lou jumped to a conclusion about PA, probably because his show aired at 5 pm to start. I hope he corrects course tomorrow night.
And VDH has been eeeyoring for days now. He’s great on big pictures but I’ve never thought he was very much attuned to the kind of strategy that our VSG practices.
Unfortunately, as I see it, it’s over. Pennsylvania seems to have enacted an absentee ballot law in contradiction of the PA Constitution (the new law was used to steal the election via illegal mail-in ballots), and the Federal Court system has just approved that new PA law, meaning the USSC doesn’t care what states do, contra their state constitutions or not. That implies anything a state rams through, will fly with the USSC.
Zero idea what you are talking about. First, the Texas case was accepted by the US Supreme Court and it includes contesting the vote in several states on constitutional groups, and it includes PA and is broader.
Secondly, as stated by one of President Trump’s key lawyers:
Texas not accepted yet. Need 5 justices to vote to proceed or Robert’s to make that call. Decision by Thur at 10 AM
4 justices to needed to accept case (not the 5 you claim)
5 for an original jurisdiction case
If the USSC accepted PA law, even though it appears to go against the PA State Constitution, why would you expect them to suddenly turn around in this TX case and NOT accept that same PA law? Because that’s exactly what they’d have to do, go schizo. I don’t expect them to do that.
And a plain reading of the PA State constitution doesn’t appear to support the new PA absentee ballot law in question. If the USSC accepted that plain reading, they’d have offered injunctive relief posthaste. They didn’t, and on a matter of extreme importance NOW. Don’t hold your breath waiting for them to rule in Trump’s favor. At least 3 McConnell judges appear to be on board with the steal, by my count.
I Don’t agree. The Alito ruling only drops the Injunctive relief, the case is still active. I believe SCOTUS chose to take the Texas case because it broadens the scope to include the 4 states. Simple logic, why take one case with one state when you can decide a similar case for 4 states,
While it’s possible that there are some strategic shenanigans the USSC may be taking here, I suspect they’d say so if it was firmly so. Bundling up actions is common enough, but there are signals of this, and I don’t see any so far.
I see the USSC declining to give injunctive relief, at a lower threshold of only 4 votes required. That’s a reasonably clear statement of where they’re at directionally.
Agree with Draggin. The injunctive relief aspect was / is a loser because the action to be enjoined has already occurred. That does not mean it cannot be reversed, undone, or invalidated. This also does not mean that SCOTUS would avoid the larger issue of lawlessness in PA. The PA secretary of state already acted defiantly of the Justice Alito Oct 28 order re PA segration of late ballots. Rep. Mike Kelly’s appeal is still pending but will over -shadowed by the Texas case where SCOTUS has the maneuverability afforded by original jurisdiction. It is not limited to consideration of what happened in a lower court. SCOTUS also has the 4 wayward states together in one vehicle. I do not expect that Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavannaugh, and Barrett will shrink from confronting blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law. Justice Alito is not yet finished with PA. Mike Kelly’s case is not inconsistent with the Texas et al case. Kelly is along for the ride.
Loving the like button! Thank you, Sundance and team. You rock!
I love it too.
And now I want a Dislike one as well. ?
(Kidding – don’t want to put sundance to more trouble!)
They want to “get this over with as soon as possible.” Rule on all these states and be done with it. On to Biden and China and these good little girls and boys might not be “punished if they behave themselves” with court packing.
Your doom and gloom is boring.
You seem to be reading it, so it can’t be that boring. I’d recommend you move over to other websites, where your crass comments are more welcome, lad. This isn’t that kind of site.
You need to know what you are talking about before you post.
You should probably take your rude comments elsewhere as well, lad. This isn’t that kind of site.
railer,
Your responces are more appropriate to YOU. You ARE preaching a consistent theme of doom and gloom, a typical “tell” of a Rolcon.
For anyone, at this stage in the process, to be saying “its all over”, and NOT having an ulterior motive, they gotta be as ignorant as a bag of rocks.
A whole other issue, which will go directly to SCOTUS, is a legislature invoking Article 2, section 1 i.e. refusing to certify, and directly naming electors, which WILL be challenged.
Az legislature has just invoked, according to article on GP.
STILL many paths to victory, which is why I say anyone saying “its over”, is either woefully uninformed, or has bad intent.
There is only one path to victory. It is through the USSC. It has been so from day one. The first reconnaissance on that position has been repulsed savagely.
You can ignore that the USSC just accepted a recently passed PA law that contradicts the PA State Constitution, but that event did occur. They accepted it, and if they accept that pile of crap in a state, where does any relief come, in ANY state? Apparently, if the state does it, it’s fine. So says McConnell’s USSC.
Sorry, I may be ignorant but I’m not stupid. I’m staring at what they’re doing, and commenting on it. The USSC has to overturn something, somewhere, and ultimately a number of somewheres, and they have to do it NOW… NOW… not 6 months from now. They had their first shot at it today, over a somewhat simple issue, and they declined. This bodes horribly. The other states, by precedent, would break similarly. The states did it, and the USSC goes along with state action, similar to PA, where a plain reading of the PA State constitution should have had them ruling Trump’s way on this.
Get out in the streets, because the steal is being consummated.
Amen, Dutchman. Methinks lots of Chinese moolah paying for these Rolcons infesting TheConservativeTreehouse.
Hi guys! We are Americans and be afraid, very afraid. No matter what you try, do or say, we will defeat you.
“The simple act of an ordinary brave man is not to participate in lies, not to support false actions!”
– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Jenna Ellis explained above. Only the injunction was denied. The case itself is still pending to the sc.
So we can look forward to the USSC final decision sometime during Biden’s first term?
The matter is pressing. The steal is in its final phase. The USSC is the final forum and it’s not only doing nothing positive, today’s issuance is a negative. That’s what we know right now.
Wailer, this is far from over. Trump has numerous plays left. We have a good month of maneuvering left, so sit back, quit the fear porn, and enjoy the show.
Trump is playing the Judicial card, then will play the Legislative card, and if he has to, play the Executive card, which Trumps them all. Just be ready to decide what kind of man you are, where you want your country to end up, and what you plan to do about it
It will be the most important decision of your life.
You seem to call for sitting back and waiting, so apparently you don’t think it’s all that important, because it’s all happening right now. The time for action is NOW… not later. And no, there isn’t a bunch of cards to wait on… it’s the USSC or bust.
robert uhlhorn: Election fraud and violation of the constitution are two separate issues. Fraud allegations pertain to potentially illegal manipulation of the voting process or outcome, whereas, the constitutional issues has to do with whether or not the way that the election was conducted violated the constitution.
I am not an attorney, but, this is my “take” on the issues at hand. Perhaps, someone with deeper expertise will weigh in.
The Texas case mentions voting irregularities. Proof of fraud could be on the table
Pre-taped.
The Texas case does not concern fraud, but the constitutionality of election law changes made by the executive branch and judiciary.
The Supreme Court will be the court of original jurisdiction not as an appellate court? This is not an appeal of a dispute previously adjudicated by a lower court? When and what were the previous disputes the U S Supreme Court was the Court of Original Judgement.
Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado (1999)
South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966)
Chisholm v. Georgia (1794)
MArbury v. Madison (1803)
Pennsylvania v the Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company (1855) and Pennsylvania v West Virginia (1923). PA should not be complaining about original jurisdiction
This is the first legal action that has lifted my spirits beyond doubt and gets to the heart of the issue, damage to the Republic, States, and Citizens due to fraud committed by other States.
All I can say is WOW!
Not a lawyer. NAL However, Texas filing goes to the heart of the matter and it seems to me that the SCOTUS justices who look hard at the Constitution would have difficulty tossing the case.
Yep. It might get into details and evidence. I think Texas has standing?????
Gimme a T for Texas…
Those were the days, my friend! Good times.
Ah, I miss those sweaty crowded inebriated outdoor concerts with our favorite bands, those were the days. Sorry COVID generation, you will never know the experience, those days are gone.
Not to brag but I am so proud to be Texan at this moment. We have a super group of guys leading our state.
@Patti
Like!
Excellent performance even live! Very talented!! Crowd almost as big as a Trump Rally !!!
Well, we’ll see.
The SC turned down the Pennsylvania lawsuit just as I predicted. They want no part of this.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/scotus/2020/12/08/id/1000615/
Nope.
Read the rest of the story, below, posted by Todd.
The test of your prediction remains pending
They turned down the ’emergency’ status, the case is still to be heard.
The lawyer for Parnell himself said that this ruling against inductive relief makes it unlikely SCOTUS will rule favourably on the case going forward.
Fact is, this case may not be needed – the Texas case may be more solid.
Not correct. Only the injunction was rejected. The case itself is still pending. A misread by Newsmax.
Now the USSC will be on record to uphold the US Constitution against subversion from both foreign and domestic enemies. Or USSC will aid and abet enemies to take over the Republic. The choice is theirs. History is watching and recording.
“Now the USSC will be on record to uphold the US Constitution against subversion from both foreign and domestic enemies. Or USSC will aid and abet enemies to take over the Republic. The choice is theirs. History is watching and recording.”
_________________________________________________________
It doesn’t matter and they don’t care who is watching……..if they win, they write the history.
They only write the history if they win. Black robes do not render you immune to a charge of treason before a military tribunal.
And, Yes, I DO think President Trump will go there if there is no other way to save the Republic. He’s giving every one of them every chance to do the Constitutional thing, but if they fail he’s been preparing in the DoD.
Take President Trump at his word. This will NEVER be a socialist country.
I agree. The VSGDJT is letting this play out to see who supports the Constitution and who doesn’t. Those who don’t get a cigarette and a blindfold.
A SCOTUS that goes rogue must ultimately answer to the People.
Praying other states join with Texas.
7 other States have joined; Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota.
I am liking the darker font on the comments!
Wait…maybe Arkansas too.
I’m loving the darker fonts too.!
The problem I have now, for the first time, is words are broken up from sentence to sentence.
Is anyone else seeing sentences this way?
Several posters have made this same claim of other states joining the Texas suit and several times other posters have asked for documentation to verify the claim. So far, not one poster has offered verification of other states joining the suit. Why should we accept the claim without verification?
Well, around here we are free to try to verify things like that for ourselves if we can, and are in doubt.
There are some search engines I could suggest. Not Google.
This is it, hail Mary! Prayers.
Tweet
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
·
16m
?IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert.
@MikeKellyPA
’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Imagine the whiplash people will suffer going from ‘USSC rejects appeal of Pa. lawsuit’, to ‘the suit is still pending.’ Thanks for posting the rest of the story.
Perhaps true, but they’re signaling their intention. The new PA law seems to fly against a plain reading of the PA State constitution, and if the USSC accepted that plain reading, they’d have granted injunctive relief. They may accept it later, but don’t count on it.
Justice Alito denied the Pennsylvania mail-in ballots injunctive relief request.
Injunctive relief is generally only granted when there is no other remedy available.
The Texas case recently filed supercedes the mail-in ballots injunctive relief request which was just denied.
https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1336458764107431936?s=21
Your twatter guy appears to have it wrong. Alito referred the request to the entire USSC, which refused to grant injunctive relief, without comment, meaning the USSC couldn’t get 3 of the remaining 8 USSC judges to agree with Alito. That’s what we know so far, that 3 of McConnell’s judges refused to grant injunctive relief in PA.
I think we’re grasping at straws re the TX thing. That’ll turn on the same reasoning that the USSC just used in PA. They accept current PA law, as implied by today’s action, so why would they reject it later re TX?
railer- I hope we are wrong and that a miracle happens. I am on a roller coaster ride at this point, with whiplash.
Yeah, I’m praying for a miracle too, Sen. I didn’t realize evil ran this deep here, but it does and they’re actually close to stealing a presidential election. It’s so disappointing, but miracles do happen and I’m praying for one.
No, sit, they are NOT signaling ANYTHING.
They did the SAME exact thing over the DACA bill. PDJT’s admin filed for an emergency injunction, it was denied. But they heard the whole case and he won.
So pay a little more attention before casting EVERYTHING negatively, please and thank you.
Would you agree that this election carries a bit more urgency than an immigration issue, and perhaps more than a bit? Would you agree that immediate relief is required, if the USSC believed that the issues involved have merit? I would say yes, to both questions.
Or perhaps you believe the USSC will decide 8-10 months from now to find for Trump and have Biden removed from the WH? I would say that’s a low probability event.
I’m paying great attention to this, however I must say your attention and analysis appears lacking.
Railer, you have a good name. Railing against anything positive anyone says. Go ahead a be a doomer. I can actually understand that, goodness knows we haven’t seen much to give us faith.
However, there’s no need to comment on everything with such negativity. You’ve made your point several times. We got it, you’re pessimistic about this.
It’s time now to let others speak and make their points, without the automatic Debbie downerisms.
I’d say all get their say on this site, although some like you would rather they didn’t have that right, an attitude similar to those who are stealing this election, ironically.
My understanding as well, unfortunately.
The Supreme Court won’t take it.
President Trump always wins.
Well then, if you say so…….
They did.
OT but huge. Senate report just out re: Hunter Biden, China, Ukraine, and more. The table of contents is a great, an amazing start. I just finished the executive summary. Joe Biden will never take the oath of office.
One item fro TOC:
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf
20 minute law education you don’t want to miss.
Thank you for sharing this.
So far the judiciary has been unimpressive. I knew the legal system has been broken, just not how broken.
I hope the SCOTUS treats this with the care it deserves.
What all these lawyers, including judges, need to remember is how quickly they can make themselves obsolete.
Especially, if the populace deems the legal process corrupt.
We will not need lawyers for quite some time if the people decide a purge is needed.
agreed
Everything is bigger in Texas – Bring it on!
everyone in Red States: call your AGs to join the Texas suit.
https://twitter.com/sunshinest8sam/status/1336453678832771073?s=21
Raffaella, I have looked up every one of the references given in your post and those by sunnydaze, and all I found was several statements made on Twitter without a single verifiable reference. You are just regurgitating posts from Twitter, the outhouse of the world. Give us some real proof of all these states joining the Texas suit. Even the one from AG Steve Marshall just says if the USSC takes the case it will give Marshall guidance relative to what he should do next. He does not say Louisiana is definitely joining the case.
Yes!!! 7 States have joined TX lawsuit!
https://twitter.com/ali/status/1336442519677251587?s=20
Yet, 8 are listed.
I read 7 listed here and TX was first=8
Louisiana (1), Arkansas (2), Alabama (3), Florida (4), Kentucky (5), Mississippi (6), South Carolina (7), South Dakota (8) and Texas = 9. This is what is listed. Because the poster said 7, I am not sure if the following list is accurate or the person (and you) couldn’t count.
Great! My old state, Texas, began this. And now my new state of South Dakota is on the list.
So very happy South Dakota followed in.
Dominion did the calculation.
Here is my state of Missouri
My state too. I’m in SW MO… you?
^Like^
Have they joined? I think not. They have indicated an interest to join. When their motions to join are filed and granted, they have joined. Until then, just hot air.
LA. was the 1st state. It got the ball rolling and the 7 joined in.
So yeah, there’s 8 inc. LA.
Eight joined Texas. Math, math…
friendlyredneck
testing
According to Jay Sekulow et al. this Texas case is a significant one. May really be the “outcome determinant” case that could change things!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/12/08/december-8th-2020-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-1419/comment-page-5/#comment-7324832
This is the link I tried to post 🙂
Didn’t Gov. Newsom make unilateral changes as well? Why not go for the juggler and include CA along with ANY state that made arbitrary changes?
He did, and the global mail-in balloting was declared unconstitutional by a trial court judge about a month ago. The court’s decision was post-election, however. I do not know the status of the litigation.
And NY.
Thank you Texas.
On p. 5 of the brief (33 of the PDF), it states that the Defendant States’ electoral vote = 72. Shouldn’t that be = 62? GA=16, MI=16, PA=20, WI=10
Am I missing something?
Perhaps a pyramid wall to paste this after it is copied?
Your math is correct.
Good, the hieroglyphics is gone. That was a quite a post!
Can you belief that is how my copy/paste of the brief posted? HAHA?? Before I hit “post” it was perfect!!
The more states they get to go along with the the more “Standing” they accumulate with the SCOTUS.
Well said…
Love it!
Same old story: It’s 4 pm PST and the on-the-hour ABC news on the radio is “Supreme Court turns down PA law suit filed by GOP” and then “the story.” Is this news followed by SCOTUS saying it will hear the Texas suit joined by other states? Nope. Not one syllable about it. Not one.
Sadly, Jedediah has been going more anti Trump for a number of months now. I’m not surprised to see this statement. Then again, we all see what we want to see.
I only meant to post Jenna’s tweet, I have no idea who those others are.
SCOTIS has yet to agree to hear the case. Decision by Tbur
Justice Alito denied the Pennsylvania mail-in ballots injunctive relief request.
Injunctive relief is generally only granted when there is no other remedy available.
The Texas case recently filed supercedes the mail-in ballots injunctive relief request which was just denied.
https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1336458764107431936?s=21
Dear Fake News: The Kelly v PA case was not dismissed.
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1336461895591632896?s=21
I do care whether Biden when his so called peoples lie and cheat to get his victory. It is their world so Satan and his cohorts like Biden and his minions are in control. Be very careful if and when the rest of you are defaming the good Lord. He will not be pleased with these actions, although he is slow to anger.
It would be helpful if you could restate what you stated in terms the average person and not so average person gets it. Injunctive relief is not part of the every day’s person’s lexicon if you know what I mean.
https://twitter.com/SunshineSt8Sam/status/1336453678832771073?s=20
Why do so many posters keep making this statement about numerous states joining the Texas suit and then give some twitter site as a reference when absolutely nothing of the sort is stated in this particular twitter post. Using Twitter as a reference is as foolish as using Wikipedia as an authoritative scholarly source.
No need to keep beating this drum.
Whether or not states are or are not joining is purely factual and will be sorted out by morning by plenty of trusted news sources (obviously I don’t mean lamestream ones).
It’s not exactly a difficult question like some of the speculation about what will happen with the lawsuit.
So the more states that join the TX lawsuit is confirmed..it shows that 4 democrat counties in 4 battleground states stole an election from the other 44 states. Unbelievable!
The Supremes must hear the TX application.
Can’t avoid it. It ‘s not about quantifying illegal votes it’s about State govt following it’s own laws.
A different kettle of fish.
SCOTUS will do everything it can to avoid hearing it because of where it leads.
More importantly, it’s about the US Constitution, which gives the sole power to detemine the manner of federal elections, i.e., election law. When state AG’s and SoS’s and governors issued orders altering deadlines or procedures (or did things like just sending out mail-in ballots to every registered voter), they were changing election law.
I hear several states have joined this lawsuit with Texas. Does anyone have a list? The more the better, SCOTUS will have a hard time dismissing this if lots of states claim harm.
Think I’ll call the AG here in PA, Josh Shapiro. Not to join the suit because he never will, but just to tell him he sucks. ?
(And he does!).
I have requested the Attorney General of New Hampshire join this lawsuit. We’ll see what happens. If he believes in the state motto “Live Free or Die” then there should not be any hesitation.
Does it make it harder for the Supremes to deny to hear the Texas case if more States join them?
Whoa! posted an image it it was super large. Deleted it.
I liked it 🙂 It seemed appropriate to make Texas REALLY BIG—Texas stepped up to the plate big time!
?
Haha, saw that. I just figured everything really is bigger in Texas.
?
Didn’t think SD and the admins needed anymore headaches right now.
Must have been a pic of Stacey Abrams!!! HAHAHAH
The country can never repay General Flynn for what he and his family has endured. This man truly truly suffered for his country. The traitors must be held accountable.
Glad to see that 8 states are stepping up to the plate to file this lawsuit with SCOTUS. Not sure how to evaluate the chances of success, but when states have disputes it’s the SC that has to hear the case, or dismiss it. Though by all appearances and the info available to the public the issue is plain enough: why should citizens in these 8 states have their cast votes nullified by electoral misconduct of the named offending states?
Of course the “deep blue” states aren’t joining the effort, no doubt they’re in on the grift and support the steal all the way. The Texas suit isn’t directly about the fraud rather focuses on the unconstitutional nature of state procedures. To my mind, the Constitutional issues are but a side-effect of the fraud, nonetheless they’re the ticket needed for entry into the arena where the fight will be waged.
I dunno, is the Texas suit the last chance to get matters before the SC to stop the steal? If the suit fails is it over for President Trump or does he have more tricks up his sleeve? I guess we’ll soon find out one way or the other.
BTW good to see the comments have been improved some more! Changing text color makes it much easier to read. Thanks for doing that!
I am surprised that nobody seems to have noticed President Trump’s September executive order 13848 requiring an intel report on the 2020 election within 45 days of the November 3rd election.
Remember he cleaned house at Defense installing C. Miller SecDef and E. Cohen-Watnick head of Def-Intel.
It is foolish to depend upon a corrupt SCOTUS.
The country’s fate more likely depends upon these above 2 people than SCOTUS.
Someone commented upthread that DNI Ratcliffe said that his report about foreign interference in the election wouldn’t be out until sometime in January…but if the EO mandates within 45 days, that would be December 18th. Not sure what that means but anything that pushing reporting further out doesn’t seem like a good thing, IMHO!
It was probably me, I’ve read the E.O. from 2018. Nonetheless, Ratcliffe said (in that interview) the report would be coming out in January.
A new hope for our Republic
The Eyes of Texas are Upon You – SCOTUS.
And the rest of MAGA Nation!
The 7 states lawsuit challenging DACA was filed by Texas on May 1, 2018 and continues to this day
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6382288/118-cv-00068-state-of-texas-v-nielsen/
Thank you for making the print darker. The 2.0 is a winner in my book.
I’m from Wisco and GOD BLESS TEXAS!! Our AG and lame-O Gov (as well as our REPUBLICAN majority state legislature–main guy by the name of ROBIN VOS) need a swift kick in arse. Milwaukee (city and county) pulled this EXACT same BS in 2018 in the Governor election–pulled votes out after 1am which put Evers ahead of Walker–who had led ALL night. 🙁
Are there no other states willing to follow Texas’s lead?
Don’t look towards NC..I’m looking at a $1000 fine for not wearing a mask in a small town.
So far it’s up to 8 states having joined in on the Texas suit … PDJT wasn’t kidding when he hinted yesterday at things happening over the next couple of days … the judicial landscape will be much different by morning.
And BTW, the PA suit is NOT dead, just the request for immediate injunctive relief … the PA case is still on the docket.
This week’s excitement is just starting ….
Thumbs up