There are only a few instances where a party can file a direct lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, a state claiming harm by another state is one of those instances.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit [pdf here] with the supreme court seeking and emergency injunction against Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”
The Texas AG argues that arbitrary changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
The lawsuit states: “these non-legislative changes … facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.” […] “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”
Paxton notes the intent of the states may have been changes in good faith, due to COVID-19 mitigation efforts; however, the end result of the changes is in direct violation to the Constitution and therefore creates the harm.
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting.” […] “The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States.”
Here’s the full Lawsuit as filed:
Spectacular. Just danced with my 5 year old to “God Bless Texas”. Thanks.
Don’t Mess With Texas! I can’t say I trust the Supreme Court as I’ve lost trust with much of the US Gov. The Supreme Justices can ignore much, but not so easily a state.
BIG SMILES 🙂
The scotus will do nothing. Nothing. They will claim the remedy is in state legislatures. Texas cant force another state to conduct its election in a certain way. No kraken here
Election
Theft
Matters
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTrAWhh/geotus-retweets-activated-acb/c/
GOD BLESSED TEXAS
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Texas and Texans.
https://twitter.com/4thAmendmentRe2/status/1336432216281374726
hmmm lets try this
The docket is just a logging system. Here’s a link to Mike Kelly’s petition, for example. If you scroll down, you’ll see it was referred and denied on the same day (12/8):
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
Yes? Lol… We’re a bunch of ferocious Americans.
Texas just called four states disloyal to the constitution. Go time is near.
Don’t mess with Texas. Now, time for other Red State AG’s to grow a pair and join Texas in the lawsuit.
Count Louisiana in! Woo hoo!
Has LA AG, Mike Landry, joined in the TX suit with SCOTUS?
It appears as if Louisiana has joined another suit or suits – here is a quote from a statement by Jeff Landry. However, I imagine he will join the TX suit if he is able at this point:
Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana.
Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.
I have no idea if they’re gonna take the case. But I really hope so.
According to the link that Gerry posted above SCOTUS has docketed the case! Hallelujah!!
Sundance – any info on whether other red states such as Florida or Ohio might join the suit?
Just out that SCOTUS will indeed take the case.
“Down Goes Biden!”
Now I see that it has only been filed with SCOTUS, not yet determined to be heard.
I would like to hear Toobin’s analysis…oh, right.
yep, people are confusing the docket with what the SCOTUS has agreed to hear. I’ve been giving links to the Mike Kelly petition so people can see how the docket gets updated based on the Court’s decision (in this case, “referred” and then “denied” on 12/8).
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
They won’t.\
They just refused to take the PA case, which was about as clear an example of ignoring law as there is.
It’s over.
They Dropped the Kelly case from PA, not the Texas case. They dropped the Kelly case because the relief sought was the invalidation of all mail in votes. They refused to hear the case, because they would have had to rule in his favor if they upheld the law.
Yep because they are cowards. Those damn justices are no different than the cowards in our legislature.
The goons and thugs running the elections for the Dems purposely saw to it the ballots that came in late were mixed with those that came in on time. Too effing bad. Throw ll of them out and let the voters be pissed with the people and the party that did it.
Further, the mail-in votes by the thousands were put in drop boxes and were not equipped with the cameras and lights that were promised….so that all kinds of ballots could be dropped with no one observing.
PA, therefore, with the mail-ins, did not establish a chain of custody. That’s a violation of election
I realize Trump mail-ins would be included in those thrown away but if the bastards had guts, that’s the kind of thing they have to do to stop this nonsense. Voters have to pay attention to the election laws that exist or else they are disenfranchised.
Hey Eeyore, you need a hug or something?
He is always negative!
I actually think they canned the Pennsylvania case because the Texas case includes Penn and so much more. Why do two cases when the decision on the Texas case would also be a decision for the Penn case?
I hope you’re right BB.
SCOTUS has no choice.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
17.
This Court has original and exclusive
jurisdiction over this action because it is a
“controvers[y] between two or more States” under
Article III, § 2, cl. 2 of the U.S. Constitution and 28
U.S.C. § 1251(a) (2018).
The case goes to Alioto’s desk per Robert’s assignments announced a couple/few weeks ago,
Next up FL?
Louisiana is on it: https://ladoj.ag.state.la.us/Article/10825
ugh, Alito denied to application for injunctive relief.
That’s a separate case from the Texas one.
The Texas case is the one.
Not exactly. Alito sent it to the full court for a vote and the application didn’t get 5 votes. We don’t know how the justices voted.
That case was as clear as could be.
But it could not get at least 4 Justices to agree to even hear it.
Exactly this…
For SCOTUS to accept a case. it takes a total of 4 Justices saying yes.
That means out of the 5 remaining “conservative” , Alito couldnt get 3 of them to agree to hear this case. And it has merit. It’s not based on fraud, it’s based on Unconstitutional actions by the Government of PA.
Defacto….this legitimizes everything the SOS and Gov did without the Legislature to alter the election.
That tells you the vote was 6-3 against. Alito, Thomas, and ACB in all probability, with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh siding with Roberts and the Democrats.
The Kennedy backed Judges, Gorsuch and Kennedy, are probably going to clown themselves to stay in the Deep State Uniparty Hierarchy. Hope I’m wrong, but here’s evidence that is likely to be the case.
The Texas suit I believe requests the matter be sent back to the legislature, which the uniparty is comfortable they still control.
Kavanaugh suffers from Stockholm syndrome and Gorsuch will always be a wild card.
So, who is the next faceless hero we will put all our faith in to save the republic next? Since clearly we don’t want to do it ourselves?
There will never be a ruling from these 9 that dissuades those running elections from coming up such election nonsense if ballots give them the results they want.
Correct.
The only hero of the republic is us. But only if we choose to be so.
Is there cause for Judge Alito to do this to encourage all interested states to do the same as Louisiana and Texas? Denying injunctive relief may protect him from looking biased? All of scotus will look at the Texas case; Alito is less alone during that case.
Won’t matter. Becomes a moot point, superseded by the TX AG filing which will rule the day for states of concern, imho.
Louisiana’ suit presents it’s case to SCOTUS on the Constitutionality of other State’s 2020 federal election behavior,… not on a political basis. Get to Work, SCOTUS,.. and be quick about it!!
I think Louisiana has joined in.
Proud of my state.
And yes, if fraudulent elections are allowed to stand, secession IS on the table.
And Texas is the most viable candidate to go first, if this doesn’t work out.
I recall a recent MSM opinion piece, where the writer asserted that the North won the Civil War, and therefore the North won the right to rule the country (and choose the presidents) evermore. Be sure the northeastern swells greatly resent that Donald Trump was not their choice in 2016: that alone made him illegitimate, to them.
Texas secedes, I’m moving there. They will be flooded with refugees from the Tyrannical States of America.
“Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night,
and when you move,
fall like a thunderbolt.”
— Sun Tzu
If I’m not mistaken it was Mark Levin on his radio show several days ago made this point that states could do this, looks like someone was listening.
Kris Kobach, former Kansans Sec. of State, was the mastermind, I believe. Probably asked TX AG Paxton to file suit.
I believe it was a caller from Israel. Mark was delighted by the call.
That was it, thanks.
This is how the courts will be used to protect “they” by creating a catch-22:
If anyone had filed suit BEFORE the election…
the courts would have said the issue is not “ripe”, meaning that the allegation of fraud doesn’t prove fraud, and because the allegation is made BEFORE the election, it hasn’t HAPPENED yet, IF it’s going to happen, and so the court is powerless to do anything;
Now, when filing suit AFTER the election…
the courts say “it’s a political issue, it’s outside the purview of the courts”, OR, “you’re too late, you should have filed BEFORE the election, we can’t do anything now, because what you’re asking is to overturn the election, and we can’t do THAT without proof.”
self-protecting catch-22
We’ll see if this approach gets a different result.
They (SCOTUS) still must accept the case. THEN decide if there is a “case” or “controversy” that IS justiciable.
THEN, maybe, they get to the first issue: is this a political question?
They can go in circles forever if they want.
You’ve broken the code 🙂
Proud to be a Texan
How can this be ? Biden has already named his Secraray of Health and Education!
invalids gonna invalidate
I contacted Daniel Cameron (KY AG) and asked him to join Texas since our state used the same machine that cost Matt Bevin the election to Andy (baby) Breshear. Votes were flipped from Matt to Andy (baby).
I contacted our AG in ID to join and back the lawsuits of TX and LA
I did the same (Idaho) Runner
Thank you for changing the font color of the comments, much easier to read!
But now my font size has dropped to 8 pt? Help!!
Seems like the replies to a comment do show up in a smaller font size
Some posters comments are one size and some are another.
I have two different fonts showing up on my comments pages.
I do like the darker print though.
VM, yes, I have to squint now. But at least the initial post is a bit darker. Can’t wait for notifications and like buttons.
You can “zoom” your font size up from 100% to 120% to 150% or even higher if need petzmom.
Now the line breaks are all messed up on all threads. Nobody said this would be easy. Text block needs to be set to unjustified, no hyphenation.
But now it’s chopping words up on the right side margins, making them hard to read. But I’m sure
someone is on it.
YES, INDEED! Much better with BLACK font instead of gray??
Very smart. I wish our stupid AG in NC would join them, but he and the Gov are partisan hacks.
Still trying to figure out how he won. Senate race won by Republican. Lt. Governor race won by Republican. Most of the top state positions won by Republicans. How did that idiot get re-elected? Does NC use Dominion too?
Vote FRAUD!
Been wondering that myself!
SCOTUS takes the case
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
I read that it was only “docketed”, which means they are just saying it was presented/written correctly.
Anyone know for sure?
Does a case being docketed mean that they’re going to take it?
I don’t know about SCOTUS, but in District Court, when a case is docketed, it’s “on the docket” meaning it will be reviewed and ruled on.
Has a case number been assigned?
Supreme Court website has a number listed.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
No. It just means the CLERK accepted it. The documents include a MOTION for the SCOTUS to take the case; and the justices need at least a day to read the motion, and they need to set a deadline for the defendants to file oppositions. After that, there might be a hearing on the motion, and after that an order will issue probably granting (or possibly denying) the motion. Once the motion is granted, the case proceeds.
Watch to see when oral arguments are calendared. They might even offer a link to listen to the oral arguments.
https://www.scotusblog.com/events/
No, it does not. Here is Mike Kelly’s petition which was ruled on today. Notice that it has a docket number, supporting documents and if you scroll down a bit to 12/8, you’ll see “referred” followed by “denied”.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
Hallelujah!
Good to see some sanity. Go Texas! And Texans!
Thank you, Jesus!!!! (and Texas!)
At first, I thought the lawsuit was a joke but this is more interesting. I am also wondering if other states will join the lawsuit, such as Florida?
Let’s do this Florida… Kick some Dimm butt!!!
I believe Louisiana is also going to file a similar suit.
Appears that Texas has a sense of humor,
filling at 2359. So Cool.
Thanks Sundance for the darking of the
comment field, plus all the realtime updates
Word wrap has a small issue.
3 edits getting spoiled. ??
“Appears that Texas has a sense of humor, filling at 2359. “
I’m not getting the humor. Can you explain?
IIRC that on the 8th of December it would
have been to late.
So 11:59pm on the 7th
of December was
about as late that it
could be.
Like bidding for something with a
higher bid with 20
or less seconds remaining.
Filing at the last minute?
23:59
Appears that Texas has a sense of humor,
filling at 2359. So Cool.
As a paralegal, let me say this: I can’t COUNT the number of times we’ve gotten a filing in exactly a minute under the filing deadline! LOL This may well be a case of rushing but trying to make sure every “i” is dotted and every “t” crossed – right up to the last absolute minute. I have spent more time than I care to standing at a fax machine in the middle of the night PRAYING something doesn’t go wrong before I get that faxed confirmation!!
Then again, maybe Paxton has a wicked sense of humor!
TxConservativeMomof2, you nailed it.
When working on a large, complex case, and even smaller ones, clerks and paralegals are racing against the clock to file the paperwork – there are so many items that must be entered and it is a complex, technical process to file a federal case.
Racing, racing to get it in under the wire is par for the course. A stiff drink at the end of the day and thanks to God calm the nerves!
Remember the Alamo!!!!
“Remember the A La Mode Review” ~ Dealey Plaza rally, RINOs ruined Texas
?? ??
Thanks I needed that!
? ?
Mega-like!
LOL!
I must thank the brave men and women of Texas for once again taking the last stand to save our nation under siege by a foreign power. There is a reason that citizens from every state, no matter where they live are partly texan.
I see shipwreckedcrew annotate TCT as projecting personal narrative instead of law based on actual experience.
shipwreckedcrew also posted that ballots need to be kept secret but then contradicted himself in reflecting on curing processes for ballots. A ballot can only be effectively cured if it is not kept secret and the ballot caster is contacted for the “curing”. Narratives are good for him but not others? Big fan of both posters. lol.
Those radicals are rather fond of having it both ways. Eat their cake and keep it too. Rules for thee but not for me. All that jazz without a bit of common sense!
All those criminals involved should be made to sleep with Fang Fang.
They let those lefty states band together and sue the other states over the global warming nonsense, so there’s precedent for this, I’d say.
Good on ya’ Texas!!! Pretty bad that it took this effort from another state to get this election right, but this ol’ Georgia boy says “Thank You”!!!
Someone pointed out in the daily thread – if this results in disqualifying electors in these states, Biden would still have a “majority of electors appointed” if nothing else changed. And under a reading of the 12th amendment it could be enough to be elected.
He’s got to get to 270…without these states, he wont get there
Not according to this student of the constitution. This lawyer explains how Trump has 4 potential paths. Biden has one and that is only if Trump concedes. A 1.5 hour vid but it goes quickly and is an education as to how our constitution works under a contested election with the current representation in the House and Senate. Watch it if you can and please share with friends. It’s good.
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1nAJELlPQzlGL
I love Texas……most folk there have back bone.
Thank you Texas
you are welcome!
You should meet my gun toting 76 year old Texas born mother… She’s a hoot
PA case will not be heard, so this one needs to be accepted
Love it! I make it a point every day to go to the liberal rag, Austin Statesman and either ridicule or bash in the manner they deserve. Almost immediately, the crybabies started with A.G. is trying to stay out of jail for all his crimes…waaahhhhh…followed with… he is shooting for a pardon for all the crimes he still hasn’t been charged with…waahwaah. My comment on their Twitter page was “Good! Trump won the election. No way would a head of cabbage win the office of president!”
And the Arizona Legislature has invoked Article 2, Sec. 1 of the US Constitution to rescind certification of their election results.
Thanks for the font color change!!
So much easier to read, now!!
SCOTUS won’t take it up.
They just refused to consider the blatant actions in PA.
Sorry everyone….it’s over.
Or IT’S JUST BEGINNING . . . ??
It’s an original action, not an appeal like in the PA case. There’s no discretion not to rule on the merits. Texas may ultimately lose, but it’s not over. Plus, there other lawsuits percolating in the lower federal courts.
Nothing is over. Watch, concern trolling can wait till after jan 20. End
Well…..OK then.
Just to be clear….you get wholesale prices for your hopium, right??
The Texas case includes multiple states and overlaps. It’s far from over.
Plus multiple other cases just need to get to a real judge and not a political hack judge like in these corrupt cities.
Hey, chicken little, take your negativity to Drudge, where it belongs.
Without PA’s 20 electoral votes, Trump can’t win.
Without being able to get the PA fraud in front of SCOTUS, those 20 are going to be certified for Biden. Probably tomorrow.
As Rush is fond of saying — I reside in “Realville”. The Swamp is winning. And the Swamp is real.
Go ahead and roll over if you want. It’s not even halftime. Other than being a good example of weakness, what have you to offer to this set of patriots? You sound like a MSM person.
You’ve posted your doom and gloom multiple times. I think you’re a left wing troll.
Some people are just hard wired to bend the knee and go back to sleep. It’s easier that way
You can’t blame them, they were raised with zero backbone.
Others are made to fight, never quit and expose corruption and evil doings. Don’t snap at eeyores and concern trolls, just advise them to sit back while we set the example of what winning is all about, them they will tell the tales about our exploits in the future.
Fantastic! God Bless Texas and Sundance for the tiny editor.
https://noqreport.com/2020/12/08/breaking-justice-alito-denies-pennsylvania-elector-injunction/
Per the article, Alito referred the case to the Court and it rejected it.
Still gonna put your hopes in SCOTUS?
It is not logical to expect a just outcome from a corrupt system.
The Texas case is clear cut and includes much of the PA case. No explanation explains it all…
I agree if the Texas case doesn’t go well, we could have issues but I am keeping the faith!
I agree trumpthepress. I think the SCOTUS knows that the result from the Texas case would also affect Penn. Why do Penn when you can handle it in one case instead of two.
Well it fits with the pattern of federalist society judges – controversial? No action. Uncomfortable – take no action. Could it be viewed politically? No action. Of course Roberts and the other liberals just act like a Democrat subcommittee of the Senate.
So far from judges involved in this election we’ve had – writing their own legislation (PA Supreme), lack of standing (multiple – voters, electors, party officials, residents of states all lack standing), no injury has yet occurred (multiple courts, prior to election), laches (it’s too late now, the election has happened – multiple judges), you would be disenfranchising Joe Biden (multiple courts in MI and WI), you filed too early (multiple), you filed too late (multiple), there’s not enough time (multiple).
I think the message multiple courts have given us is clear. Democracy is whatever you can get at the end of a gun. Courts will not help you.
I agree. People need to stay frosty about this whole mess. The Uniparty is going to try and preserve the status quo, and the status quo is that the Uniparty decides who wins elections (regardless if the means were illegal or not, and a MI Judge said so yesterday) not the voters. The status quo is also that elections are FOR SHOW, therefore the announced result of the FOR SHOW election is what everyone is required to kneel and accept. That is the status quo for a couple hundred years.
The cynical approach is the best approach. I’ve never regretted expecting the most cynical possible outcome in every situation involving our corrupt government. Occasionally, I get surprised.
But usually not.
It is not logical to expect a just outcome from a corrupt system.
Stated a second time for its brevity and accuracy.
That is not the Texas case. The Texas case was put on the docket.
I don’t think putting it on the docket means much. For example, here is a link to Mike Kelly’s suit, which was also assigned a docket number 20A98
Notice further down the page that it says “referred” then “denied” on 12/8.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
Excellent, I love my State of Texas! Hopefully all other states will join the action.
This case decides everything!
First, I expect 5-10 more states to fill ME TO filings in essence joining TX and saying we too would be harmed and our justification is the same as TX
Second the SC has 3 options IMO….
a) listen to both sides and possibly rule against TX and we are back where we were yesterday with these states and their electors back in the Biden column. (But I don’t think they would have taken the case to make this ruling in the end)
b) throw out the 62 electoral votes from these 4 states and tell these states that their state legislatures must now determine who their electors are.
c) thrown out the 62 electoral votes from these 4 states meaning NO ONE gets the required 270 electoral votes to win so the election goes to Congress where the house selects the President and the Senate selects the VP where each state has 1 vote. Today I believe R’s control 27 states and D’s 22 with 2 split in the House.
now what I really hope happens is by Friday after 5-10 additional states have joined the suit, that Ratcliffe comes out with his required report supporting PT EO 13484 and says THERE WAS foreign interference in the election.
Depending on the foreign connections it could allow PT to invoke the EO and the Insurrection Act whereby I believe he can have the military seize possibly all voting machines and conduct a full forensic audit to see if there was any vote manipulation.
Then depending on the outcome of that forensic audit IMO could decide if there is evidence of any possible massive coup/conspiracy.
Bottom line PT just may have the opportunity not only for a 2nd term but also take down some DS traitors while he is at it.
Come on John Ratcliffe!
Ratcliffe already told Herridge that report won’t be coming until January. Watch the clip where she asks him about foreign interference affecting votes. He says it at the end.
Isn’t the ‘report’ due no later than 45 days from November 3, which is ~December 18?
How can ratcliffe ask for an “extension” from a statutory date?
Option 4) refuse to take the case at all. It is totally optional. I think this is the most likely path, and it follows what the judges at lower levels have been doing – just ignore it, dismiss it, etc. TX needs 5 justices to vote to take the case. There are very likely 4 definite “no’s” (Robers, Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer) and I would wager only 2 definite “yes’s” (Alito, Thomas). Kavanaugh, Gorsuch could be “yes”, hard to say, and Barrett might well abstain leaving it at 4-4.
I’m glad Texas is doing this, but everyone needs to remain cynical about the outcome. Our justice system is utterly corrupt. It is irrational to expect a just outcome from an unjust system.
They might well accept the TX lawsuit, and I will be thrilled if they do, but never underestimate the cowardice of the Uniparty and their desire to maintain the “status quo” which is a one-party government that rigs elections and targets its enemies to enrich itself.
Original jurisdiction differs from appellate jurisdiction. The difference is acknowledged in Article III , Section 2 U.S. Constitution. Original jurisdiction is not optional. The Mike Kelly PA case was probably dismissed because this Texas case gives SCOTUS the advantage of being able to receive evidence as opposed to a record of a lower trial. Original jurisdiction means SCOTUS makes findings of fact. Before Barrett was confirmed 4 justices had ruled against the unlawful election law changes in PA but a 4-4 tie can not over-rule the decision below. I doubt those 4 have changed their view. Barrett is probably inclinded to decide in favor of Texas.
hokkoda- according to Mark Levin, you are right. Looks like the Supremes are hopeless. Not one of them including Alito and Thomas did the right thing with the PA case. NOT ONE.
Why does he need Ratcliffe to invoke the Insurection act ….We have domestic enemies interference in the election.
No other states joined? how is that possible?
Give it time, I expect 5-10 ME TOO filings to come forward in support, especially if we here from Ratcliffe if there was any foreign election interference or if we get the results of the forensic audit of those 22 machines in MI.
Yes it is now almost midnight and there are 8 states total joining, within a few hours too.
Reading this thread to savor the developments (ignoring the eeyores of course – can we get a button to hide eeyores? ?)
Guess we will soon find out if the SC has been bribed and blackmailed by the Chinese as well.
God bless Texas and Attorney General Ken Paxton. This is from a disenfranchised Republican voter in California who felt a few states participated in election fraud that overturned the rightful re-election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States.
So we are very close to finding out whether the SC is still the great defender of the Constitution and the Truth. Can someone venture an educated guess as to what the remedy will be if the rule in favor of Texas. God bless AG Paxton.
They could prevent those states from seating electors in the electoral college.
They could advise those state legislatures that the Election results are invalid and to do their duty in appointing electors as their conscious deems.
Probably number 2. If they bother to actually hear the case. As it kicks the election to where it should be.
Then those states (all R controlled) can either set Joe or Trump or decide to withhold votes.
If they all withhold votes, then the EC fails to reach 270 and it goes to the House.
here we have 28 states so Trump should win.
But all of that depends on the system doing the just things and my new slogan is…..
It is not logical to expect a just outcome from a corrupt system.
I see that there are more changes in the works. I’m liking this.
Well, now we will see if SCOTUS agrees to hear the case and schedules a hearing.
Sadly being docketed alone does not mean they are hearing the case.
Test
AG of LA. just weighed in. More AG’s and Gov. should do this. Cuz what he’s saying is TRUE for ALL Americans:
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336419209299939328?s=20
He keeps saying “Defendant StateS,” but I only see Texas listed. Is he anticipating more states joining, or am I missing something?
Texas is the plaintiff. GA, WI, MI and PA are defendants.
And let this be a lesson to me to get a snack and a nap before I post. xD
Take heart. Snacktical and naptical errors are not fatal.
I’m really lost at this point.
I know that PA, the defendant, presented its argument to SCOTUS today (the one Alito told them to have in a day early). I thought that was supposed to be their answer to why mail-in balloting is okay. Am I right.
Then I read this: US Supreme Court denies request to stop certification of the Pennsylvania electionOn Tuesday, the Supreme Court denied a request brought by US Rep. Mike Kelly and other Republicans to reverse certification of the Pennyslvania election, which cemented President-elect Joe Biden’s victory. None of the court’s nine justices publicly dissented.
Are these two cases the same? Or different.
Once I get that clarified, I can go on to read the TX suit.
I might be able to help:
You can safely ignore just about every “last chance” event and assume it will go nowhere. The only one who will save the republic is its people, if they choose to.