Before getting to the sketchy part; first, let’s talk….
There has been a great deal of discussion about the vitriolic, almost rabid disposition of people who are pushing the vaccination.
This should not be a surprise, although it might be disconcerting to find formerly reasonable people in your network, perhaps even in your family, now become seemingly unhinged if the subject arises.
It is demonstrably true, there has been a cleaving of our American population as the debate about the COVID vaccination rages on. However, it is wise to consider the underlying psychology of a person who has been vaccinated, before engaging in an argument. You may end up being entirely correct in your position; however, an intense or combative argument? At what cost?
A vaccinated person is, as a consequence of their decision, in an irreversible frame of mind. Once the vaccination has been injected into a persons body, there is no turning back; the Rubicon has been crossed, the event horizon closes, there is no retreat. Any conversation or debate about vaccine efficacy or long-term consequences with a person who has accepted the vaccine must be weighed accordingly.
Genuine empathetic listening is needed on both sides.
The no-retreat baseline can, often does, form the origin of anger and vitriol, particularly in unstable leftists -who are, by nature of their ideology- professional blame-casters and prone to emotional responses as a matter of disposition. Therefore, it is better to avoid the topic entirely (if possible) and retain your peace of mind.
♦ Revelations over the past few years have led to the complete collapse of credibility for many institutions. The healthcare field is the latest example of a politically controlled ideological industry that can no longer be trusted to make decisions based on a detachment from their political interests.
The healthcare industry has joined the education system, the justice system (DOJ), law enforcement (FBI), the intelligence system, arts and entertainment, as well as many organizations now controlled through the prism of politics. Political ideology, as the determining factor of institutional behavior, has infected almost every facet of modern life; healthcare is no exception.
Given the nature of the metastatic corruption, very visible in multiple institutions, it is completely understandable that more people would not trust the National Institute of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or any other regulatory body or agency now vested in the COVID vaccine.
Factually, as previously stated, the FDA final approval of the vaccines is a moot point. The FDA, just like a vaccinated person, is in a no retreat position. There is no way the U.S. FDA cannot approve the vaccines that have been sold, forced and pushed upon the entire global population. Can you even begin to imagine the ramifications of the FDA saying the vaccine was (a) unsafe; or (b) ineffective? Think about it. FDA approval is a foregone conclusion, regardless of safety or efficacy.
There is every reason not to trust the healthcare industry on the issue of vaccination(s). Indeed, their obtuse behavior, logical disconnect, false assertions and gross hypocrisy is more than enough to create doubt about the vaccine. Then overlay the lack of consequence for all known institutional corruption, and there’s even more reason to doubt them.
♦ Two key issues stick in my mind about the COVID vaccines that make me pretty firm in opposition:
(1) The fact that vaccine makers would abandon the clinical trial control group is a big red flag. The fact that vaccine makers could not abandon the clinical trial control group without authorization from the FDA, CDC and NIH is an even bigger red flag. {Go Deep}
The clinical trial was assembled to produce only one result. THAT is not science. THAT is sketchy and points to an ulterior motive. That is not science, that’s political science.
(2) The fact that data shows the vaccine provides no benefit is another big red flag. Specifically, the equal hospitalization rate of vaxxed and non-vaxxed patients. Almost every study I can find with data on COVID hospitalized cases that includes the vaccination status (not many), shows an equal percentage of vaccinated/hospitalized people to the vaccinated population in general. {Go Deep}
[ex. If 75% of the regional population is vaccinated, then 75% of the hospitalized COVID patients are vaccinated.] This statistic demonstrates the vaccine doesn’t stop serious illness.
Put both of those issues together, and overlay the demonstrably collapsed institutional credibility, and I am not comfortable with this specific vaccine.
I am not anti-VAX, I am not comfortable with THIS specific vaccination. And, again, once administered there is no retreat.
We should all cherish, respect and value the differences of opinion of this very personal issue. Healthcare is a personal and private matter. Other people have different factors, risk-factors and hundreds of considerations that guide or have guided their decision. We should all respect that; and we do not want to see ‘vaccination status‘ become a fragmentation problem for our CTH community. We are all in the same foxhole.
♦ALL OF THAT said, Dr. Ryan Cole is a Mayo-trained physician who has seen over 350,000 patients in his career. He also serves as the CEO of Cole Diagnostics, which has processed over 100,000 Coronavirus tests. Dr. Cole gave an alarming presentation that merits consideration:
WATCH VIDEO HERE
In response to criticism for his position, Dr. Cole wrote:
“I am concerned about the lack of long term safety data, because this vaccine is simply too new. We have never tried an mRNA vaccine in humans before. I am concerned about the implications of injection of foreign, synthetic mRNA and the antibody reaction which cannot be reversed. It concerns me that large numbers of individuals are being essentially enrolled in a long term phase III clinical trial for the vaccine without being fully informed of this, with no ability for recompense if injured or in case of death. I am concerned by the number of adverse event and deaths that have been reported in correlation with this vaccine administration.” (link)
Suppose the vax isn’t for the 2019 biological attack, but for the next one? That is, the US Deep State may be planning to clap back at the CCP…BioWar 101 says you don’t release an agent until your side is prepared, and until you have a good cover story for deniability.
Population stats indicate war with China would be a terrifying prospect, the one-child policy has given them 30 million “excess” males roughly of military age. Is that why the US borders are open, taking in mostly young people? Is the US approaching the moment of power parity, where our trend line vs. China is crossed – after which we would not be able to win a war? I have heard the Taiwan war-gaming scenarios have not been coming out favorably for the US side in any case.
Like many of you, I’ve been wondering what their big plan is, and although many point to the nefarious schemes published by the Davos globalists – there is a difference between money and power. The CCP is yanking on the leash of Chinese billionaires, and warning the foreign globalists of boundaries. Because our US Deep State has been in lockstep with the globalists for many years, we may forget that it’s two separate entities (money and power). But their interests may diverge at times – in which case power always rules over money.
War in the 21st century is going to be a different kind of beast, count on it.
In the hospital in Latrobe, PA., ALL of the patients in the hospital for Covid are FULLY VACCINNATED!!!! ALL OF THEM!!!!
It’s not on the news though…..
After watching some of this, it seems the push for vaccines is to create more patients. The game of substituting the flu for covid19 is up! People have been sharing the news about the change in testing standards (which have NOT yet been implemented!) so we all know why the flu doesn’t exist any more.
They need this to keep going so they can keep doing their “government as a business model” activities. There are OTHER things on the agenda but as he touches on effects on fertility, I’m believing more and more this is also about human population control.
As I have said before verify then trust or even better question and read. The broad generalizations and the large number of experts (some of which that have some level of the basic science so completely wrong that it makes one wonder if it is intentional) can contribute to misinformation and poor choices made on that basis. Yes it is the first broad scale test of mRNA vaccine technology but the technology is far from new. Then there is the we have never tried an mRNA vaccine in humans before. Might check out https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/pdf/main.pdf. Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses. There are variations that raise concern (Self Amplification mRNA [SA mRNA}) but that form is not currently in use. mRNA is not particularly stable (thus the need for the second injection). The true joke would be to consult the “experts” as to have you ever isolated RNA? The other aspect of this is that once the mRNA is translated into protein pieces of the protein are chopped up into small fragments (peptides) some of which induce the desired adaptive immune response (antibody and T-cell response). Pretty much where ever the protein shows up the adaptive immune response comes into play and targets the protein for removal. Then while protein is more stable than RNA, residual can also be recycled broken down into even smaller fragments which once again with the targeted immune response is indicated by the need for the second dose. Now about autoimmune disease? The phrase that comes into play is “multi-factorial: usually their is one or more a genetic components, physiological components, and environmental components. The end result is the immune response targets some of your own macromolecules (proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, DNA/RNA). The note is there are a bucket load (Texanese Molecular Bio. term) of molecular control mechanisms to make sure it does not happen (suggested reads, rheumatic fever, Systemic Lupus Erthyematosis (SLE), and Grave’s disease). From a population standpoint, these are relatively rare. A unifying point is that they generally require a long term exposure to the antigen and ongoing cell damage with engagement of the adaptive immune response. So is the antigen is rapidly cleared the risk goes way down. Your take- home example is rheumatic fever: Untreated strep-throat caused by a bacterial infection that goes untreated for over five days. The particular strain of bacteria is reproducing continually reaching a relative high concentration, continually producing a particuly (strain specific ) M-protein that you addaptive immune system responds to antibody and T-cell respond to along with a host of other antigens and the cell damage (think how trashy you USUALLY feel with strep-throat). Problem is portions of the M-protein from some variants and portions of proteins from some individuals structurally close but control mechanisms are still in place and require either require a preexisting or concurrent T-cell mutation and still there may be controlling mechanisms that block . Reoccurring themes; significant and extended cell damage ( persistence of antigen) in the presence of cell damage (disease related damage) which leads to extended continual activation of the adaptive immune system leading to genetic adaptive immune system accidents, AND additional individual genetic predisposition. With rheumatic fever this translates into Developing T-h2 helper T-cells that drive a B-cell response to make antibody that recognizes various self proteins (and varied symptoms). Most sever presentation the self-antibody targets proteins associated with heart valves. Neat thing is with appropriate antibiotic treatment within 5-10 days prevents occurance of the autoimmune disease (limits extent and durration of M-protein antigen). Often may require multiple strep throat infections ( frequent encounters with tha particular M-protein until the random mutations occur.
Now in full disclosure a form of SLE can be caused by some pharmaceutical agents (gentic predisposition) plus other unknown factors. For an auto immune response to the vaccine and any of the associated reproductive issues: Need extended antigen exposure and extended cell damage. As indicated above the mRNA is cleared and the translation product is cleared so that pretty much eliminates extended antigen exposure as it relates to autoimmune disease and extent of tissue damage (think cell damage and release of a lot of self protein) is minor (enough to hack off the adaptive immune system but not enough to release a lot of self protein as potential targets). This is not to say an auto-immune response could not occur but with the animal studies, preliminary human trials and follow up of the vaccinated, and millions of people vaccinated without large scale side effects, probably not very likely.
Lastly while the vaccine is considered “new” the virus itself is also “new” and the possibility of long-term effects of the virus are also unknown.
WHY does every doctor I have been around think these shots are good?
Lemme see if I can get this wrong, Once the FDA clears these shots, can’t the Industrial Poisoners be sued for adverse reactions, since the Emergency Use Order is no longer in effect??
No the pharmaceutical companies have been granted immunity.
Chapter and verse please
The pharmaceutical companies have been granted immunity since the 1980’s. See:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22
All elites are covered by the double standard laws of the U.S. I am betting that this is going to come back and bite the medical community on their hardheaded gluteus maximus. Dr. Cole has some very good points in this presentation and is as honest as anyone I have listened to. At least, he has the good sense to say, “We don’t know.”