February 27th – 2020 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1134

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.


This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Stephanie Grisham Twitter @StephGrisham45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

837 Responses to February 27th – 2020 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1134

  1. sunnyflower5 says:


  2. Troublemaker10 says:

    Trump Adm has the best of the best on top of this



    Birx directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s global HIV/AIDS division before she became the U.S. global AIDS coordinator in 2014.

    Her new role was applauded by former President Barack Obama’s Ebola response coordinator Ron Klain, who was less formally known as the “Ebola czar.”

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Patience says:

    I know this week’s main topic is Coronavirus, but does anyone know of an investigation into the Obama whistle blower that was found shot in the head last week? Is someone(s) trying to hide it? Crickets!


  4. Troublemaker10 says:


  5. sunnyflower5 says:


  6. sunnyflower5 says:


  7. Reserved55 says:

    In Jeremiah Wright’s words, Barry Insane Soetoro was selected not elected. DNC tells the truth.


    • StanH says:

      Of course they do, by their nature they’re Marxist. Giving people the vote is purely for show. You know like a Pol-Pot or Fidel winning with 98% to 2% of the vote.


  8. Hawkeye Ag Guy says:

    So this is not true as the math is incorrect. The .1% death loss is based off of the total population of the country, not the number of people that actually get the flu!
    The 2% number for the Coronavirus is based on the number of people who actually have the virus. BIG DIFFERENCE!!
    If the Coronavirus numbers were based off of the total population it would be a MUCH LOWER number. It could actually be the same or even lower than the flu.

    Liked by 1 person

    • David A says:

      Hawkeye, get thee to a remedial math school. A mortality rate of 3 percent, a likely minimum for the coronavirus, is correctly calculated only after all infected are either cured or dead.

      In the last ten years the US has had an average of about 36,000 per year die from the flu, and an average of about 36 million flu cases, so ballpark is .1 percent mortality for the flu vs total cases AFTER all cases are cured or fatal.
      ( 36,000,000 x .001 is 36,000 fatality.)
      Therefore, for now, when computing a coronavirus mortality please compare only deaths to cured. China’s sketchy numbers show about 9 percent mortality.
      The R naught of the Coronavirus has been placed at from 3 to 7. ( By disparate creditable medical science organizations.).

      It is reasonable to take a middle of the road R naught of 4.25, more then double the flu, and a death rate ( total cured by total fatal) of 4.5 percent ( pretty much a minimum when hospital emergency rooms are overwhelmed)

      So, in time in the US, the coronavirus could grow to 82 million annual patients x .045 fatal of 3,690,000 dead. ( Not a worse case scenario).

      Note, this would mean a likely hospitalization of about 15 million people over the flu season. Call it 13 million just to underestimate. Total hospital beds generally available during the 13 week virus flu season is about 200,000. ( WAG ) 65 percent general ocupancy and higher during the flu season. So 13 million divided by 13 weeks is 1 million per week. A tremendous overburden on all medical, forcing drastic triage decisions in hospitals, increasing the mortality of all serious disease.

      Now you know why China quarantined almost 10 percent of the global population and destroyed their economy at a critical time, (with only 1000 people dead in a 7 week period). Now you know why borders are closed into and out of Iran over only 30 infected. Now you know why all public events are being cancelled in numerous nations!

      Watch how nations act, not what the say.

      The Coronavirus has hospitalised 5 to 20 percent


      • Deb says:

        But how can we possibly know how many are actually infected in China? And it isn’t really possible to totally accurately gauge what is going on by watching the actions of a corrupt entity who cares more about saving face than anything else. The CCP does not choose policy based on rationality and reason.

        Which is why we need to look to S. Korea and Japan. Two countries with highly functioning health care systems and much more honest governments. That’s where we’ll get a clearer picture of the threat.


  9. sunnyflower5 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  10. VandalizeDuhMastuhsAlgorithms says:

    Why can’t Senator Lyndsey Graham actually try to deal with a real and present internal danger to this nation as say FISA abuse by corrupt
    “intelligence” authorities…

    But instead hoists a “dive right in, the water is fine” banner at the Syrian Tar Pits…



  11. sunnyflower5 says:


  12. sunnyflower5 says:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s