Former Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker appears with Lou Dobbs to discuss ongoing issues in/around the DOJ and FBI.
Matt Whitaker notes the corrupt members of the FBI/DOJ who have left the institution; but stops short of criticizing current FBI Director Chris Wray. Whitaker expresses strong support and respect for John Ratcliffe’s nomination to ODNI.
Whitaker positions himself as an advocate for transparency, but is careful not to be critical of those in the DOJ and FBI who are working diligently against releasing documents that would actually bring about transparency. The implied message is that declassification of material will ultimately force transparency…. [but he doesn’t say it].
…Every minute spent outraged at what Comey, McCabe or Muller did yesterday, is one minute less that Bill Barr is being held accountable for what he is not doing today…
Advertisements
Calling Mr. Campbell! R. Campbell please. Mr. Campbell? …….
LikeLike
Mr. Whitaker could star in the remake of the Commish. Yeah baby!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahh, what about those declassified documents, again?
LikeLike
Here is some good news about Durham’s activities:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hh3qfIoriAw/
LikeLike
I fear poor “Mac” has been drinking the government Kool-Ade.
“The Davidians DID have illegal fully automatic weapons”? No, they did not. After our proud G-men had murdered everyone in the church building, they said they’d bring out the “fully automatic weapons” they’d been after, and show them to the public. What they finally produced for a follow-up TV documentary were a couple of single-shot, turn-bolt .50-caliber rifles — fully legal without any Class 3 license. In each case they explained each rifle was recovered with one expended round in the chamber — those rounds had “cooked off” in the fire.
Please name the manufacturer and model of a single one of the “fully automatic weapons” found in the ruins at Waco, “Mac.” Please post photos. You can’t. There weren’t any. What David Koresh was “suspected of” selling — at gun shows — were joke, inoperable, empty grenade shells attached to wooden stands with little placards that read “Complaint Department — pull pin and wait.” A few months earlier the local sheriff had knocked on the door of that church building and asked to be allowed to inspect all the Branch Davidians’ firearms,. Koresh and the others gladly complied. The sheriff found nothing illegal. I suspect “Mac” knows perfectly well that that ATF raid was planned — at the Murrah Building in Kansas City — because the ATF faced a threatened cut-off in their “SWAT”:funds and needed a quick demonstration project to show how much those funds were needed.
Do we really need to hear about the treacherous “Branch Davidian ambush,” yet again? If it was an ambush, why didn’t Koresh position shooters in flanking positions outside the building? How did the government forces manage to get “ambushed” when they had armed National Guard helicopters hovering behind the building, firing in through the ceiling, killing nursing mother Jaydean Wendell as her baby crawled on the floor of an upstairs bedroom? (When Koresh attorney Dick DeGuerin entered the building — before the fire — he saw bullet holes in the ceiling. DeGuerin, a combat veteran, testified he could tell from the splinter patterns in the wood those bullets had come from outside and above.)
I suspect “Mac” also knows when the ATF agents came storming off their cattle trailers, the first thing they did — AS PLANNED — was to open fire, killing the dog and her puppies in their pen in front of the building. When Koresh opened the front Dutch door, unarmed, to yell for his assailants to cease fire, ATF agents then shot at him, missing him but hitting his father-in-law behind him. (Koresh was also on the phone to 9-1-1, pleading for the operator to ask his assailants to cease fire, to remind them “There are women and children here.” Typical behavior for the mastermind of a fiendish “ambush”?)
Autopsy results on the ATF agents who tried climbing onto the roof with ladders (SUCH a smart move) were never released. Most likely reason? If they were killed with semi-jacketed 9 mm. “Hydra-Shock” rounds, that would indicate “Friendly Fire.” As we’ve all seen photos of the ATF agents squatting behind parked cars, holding their rifles over their heads and firing at such targets as “a moving curtain” (without using their sights), this wouldn’t be unlikely.
“None of the deceased were trapped inside the compound by the authorities”? “Mac” is really unaware that our pal Lon Horiuchi, of Ruby Ridge fame, was at Waco, picking off anyone who showed themselves? And that the FBI boys then ran over the corpses of Lon’s victims, back and forth, crushing them into the mud, with their tracked self-propelled guns?
Which ATF agent had the warrant they claim they were trying to serve at the church at Mount Carmel that day, “Mac”? Come on. Give us the name of the ATF agent who carried the piece of paper called “the warrant” and tried to serve it on David Koresh et al. on Feb. 28, 1993. There could have been nothing legal about that murderous attack if they didn’t actually have a warrant with them, right? I’ve been researching this for 25 years. I’ve written books and scores of syndicated newspaper columns about it. And no one has ever been willing to name for me any ATF agent who they will even CLAIM was carrying a warrant that day.
Has “Mac” read “A Place Called Waco: A Survivor’s Story,” by David Thibodeau? Has he interviewed David Thibodeau at length? I have. Has Mac read MY book, :”Send in the Waco Killers”? As it happens, I’ve spoken with Randy Weaver and his daughter Sara at length, as well. It’s now OK for an FBI sniper to kill innocent, unarmed women in their own kitchens because he “missed his shot”? How many days into training are we taught “Always know what’s behind your target; don’t take the shot if you’re not sure where that over-penetrating round might go”? Wasn’t that on the FIRST DAY?
But “Mac” is going to advise me to “Do yourself a big favor and refrain from using Ruby Ridge, Waco, the Bundy standoff in Nevada and the Malheur standoff in Oregon as example of government excess.”
Really? These are just examples of how our federal government was meant to function? Was it really “the government agents” who “showed remarkable patience,” “Mac”? Or is it the unorganized militia that’s shown remarkable patience? You do know all the charges against my friend Cliven Bundy — a fine man who tried to work with the government agents who were trying to put him out of business for DECADES — were thrown out due to prosecutorial misconduct, right?
If Randy Weaver was such a “dangerous federal fugitive” why was he never put on trial? How come the government ended up paying him $100,000, and each of his surviving daughters $1 million?
Randy Weaver a “federal fugitive”? The ATF wanted him to spy on his neighbor, so they got an undercover agent to hire him to cut short the barrels on two shotguns, claimed they were then 1/4-inch “too short,” and told him he’d be charged unless he “cooperated.” He went to court to fight that blackmail scheme, but he’d been given the wrong court date.
When Deputy U.S. Marshal William Degan was killed in a gunfight with the Weaver family on their property — which he started by shooting and killing 14-year-old Sammy’s dog, Striker — did he have an arrest warrant with him which he was trying to serve — an arrest warrant which would have justified his being on that private property? I don’t think so..
But Mac tells us the “government agents” — who in each case SHOT FIRST — “showed remarkable patience” in these bloodbaths. Come on, “Mac,” fess up. Are you the G-man, or was it you dad? Did he get a medal?
— V.S.
LikeLike