National Quinnipiac Poll – Biden 22%, Harris 20%, Warren 14%, Sanders 13%…

The latest National Quinnipiac Poll of Democrat presidential candidates reflects a significant surge by Kamala Harris, a static position for Elizabeth Warren, and a slight drop for Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders.

Kamala Harris went from 7% in April to 20% in July. Elizabeth Warren went from 15% in April to 14% in July.  Joe Biden went from 24% in April to 22% in July.  Bernie Sanders went from 16% in April to 13% in July. That’s the top four.

Certainly Harris seems to be the biggest winner from the first debate; however, the biggest loser is not Joe Biden.  In April -at the time of his campaign launch- Pete Buttigieg was at 14%, now he’s down to 4%.  Buttigieg is the biggest loser.  As anticipated, all other candidates are essentially irrelevant.

Quinnipiac – […] “Round 1 of the Democratic debates puts Senator Kamala Harris and former Vice President Joe Biden on two different trajectories, as support for Harris surges but continues to slip for Biden.

Biden’s once commanding lead has evaporated. There are other red flags for him in areas where he still leads, including double digit drops among Democrats and Democratic leaners who view him as the best leader, or as the best candidate to defeat President Trump in 2020,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Mary Snow.

Democrats and Democratic leaners were also asked which candidate they thought had the best chance of winning against President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, regardless of who they support in the primary. Biden tops the field with 42 percent, which is a drop from the 56 percent that he received on April 30. Harris comes in a distant second with 14 percent in today’s poll, up from 2 percent in April. Sanders receives 13 percent, and no other candidate reaches double digits.  (See full polling results)

The media is most certainly doing what they can to lift Kamala Harris, a review of most media stories show a narrative of appreciating value amid the influential social circle of mainstream democrat media reporters.

Biden and Bernie are fraught with the problem of toxic male whiteness as expressed by the overwhelming majority of activists within the DNC ranks.

Bernie currently has the Communist, Socialist, Antifa and Occupy groups defending him. Unfortunately for the jackbooted moonbats, the ‘free stuff’ alignment with AOC is now a liability.  The more AOC goes stupid the more it hurts the dem-socialists.

Joe Biden is a candidate adrift in a massive political ocean sitting on a pool float, trying to survive.

Elizabeth Warren has the beltway FemGen limo-liberals as a pretty solid constituency; however attempts to grow into the ‘ima-git-me-a-beer‘ base are fraught with a lack of authenticity.

Kamala Harris has assembled all of the disparate one percent groups into a sizable enough coalition of professional grievance to outlast Warren’s lack of minority status.

By the end of August the Final Four will make up the viability field.  Currently that looks like Biden, Harris, Warren and Bernie.  However, as Biden and Bernie are dispatched the Harris -vs- Warren situation will come down to drop-out endorsements.

Obviously momentum is a temporary condition and things could change, but Biden needs to give a good performance at the next debate or his deflating pool float will drown him.

Here’s the trend data specific to Quinnipiac polling:

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Joe Biden, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda. Bookmark the permalink.

235 Responses to National Quinnipiac Poll – Biden 22%, Harris 20%, Warren 14%, Sanders 13%…

  1. bessie2003 says:

    Listening to my liberal friends commiserate over the “darkness and evilness that this Administration is pouring down in their efforts to destroy this nation, that we’re just one more Orange Man Bad rally away from actual civil war” (their viewpoint, not mine but in my mind it’s all very militaristic viewpoints) I still expect a retired 4-Star General to come out of retirement, even switch parties like a Colin Powell, to ‘bravely stand up for the righteousness of America and save this country from the evils of this russian-colluding maniac”.

    They’ve got another whole year before they have to come up with their real candidate; until then I believe what Sundance has said earlier, this exercise is all about getting voter lists and donor dollars.

    Liked by 10 people

    • I don’t see any of the current candidates making the grade. I think you might be on to something. I can actually see Colin Powell doing something like that; or Mad dog or as you said another General waiting to save the country. It would be rather ironic for the Dems to nominate a General as they are all so anti-military, or so they say, which means they are the opposite.

      Liked by 2 people

      • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

        Colin Powell is 82
        Mattis is deep state all the way, but have you heard the man speak publicly? That dog won’t hunt
        So what known general does that leave, Petraeus?

        Liked by 2 people

    • Spee says:

      The only democrat who has a chance of beating trump is tulsi gabbard. But the democrats hate her almost as much as they do trump

      Liked by 3 people

      • Orville R. Bacher says:

        Jeesh. Dang polls. And here I thought that great intellectual, deep thinker, reasoned, thoughtful Swallwell would have jumped from .00001% to .00002%.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sam Fox says:

        Spee, Gabbard can’t beat Trump. No dimm can. I pay scant attention to the ‘polls’. The ‘polls’ said that HRC would annihilate Mr. T during the pre-election cycle. Guess who was wrong again. The ‘polls’.



      • jeff montanye says:

        tulsi is whom i’m voting for in the florida primary. anyone else gets the nomination, i’m voting for trump again. if he actually puts some crossfire hurricaners in prison, he’s probably getting my vote even if somehow tulsi gets nominated (pretty unlikely, good as she is).


  2. Lack is not all says:

    In my opinion it will be Biden-Harris.

    Liked by 1 person

    • FrankieZee says:

      But Biden is a racist according to her.


      • Sam Fox says:

        Luck & Frankie–Perhaps it will be Sanders & Harris or Harris & Sanders. Dimms are sooo desperate for votes they are trying to get as many illegals in country as they can and want to give them drivers licenses & the vote. Sanders looks to have the largest un-moveable dimm voting block of all the candidates, so it would stand to reason the dnc would want him as the candidate.

        Don’t worry about Harris & Sanders on the racist issue. To get on the ticket Camel would do that any way she can.


        Liked by 1 person

      • jeff montanye says:

        kamala harris would take the vp spot and biden should get a food taster. she already slept her way to the middle; she’s negotiable.


    • Annie says:

      that is truly a scary thought..but, I really don’t think he can physically handle the campaign..not sure he can handle getting to the primary.can you imagine IF they were elected.he flames out while in office and she is POTUS..she is a VIPER!!! and is the most unlikeable of all of them..and I include Eric Swallow well in that group.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Tom22ndState says:

      Biden hasn’t the stamina or strength. He’s done now and doesn’t even realize it.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      Commie La Harris.

      Liked by 4 people

    • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

      We’re just a few weeks into the public part of this long campaign and Biden is already tripping all over himself like he always, always has.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Lucille says:

    Despite 46 years in national politics, Joe Biden still is making rookie mistakes
    By Thomas Lifson – July 6, 2019

    It is now blindingly obvious that Joe Biden is too stupid to be president of the United States.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Greg says:

    I don’t know how much REAL influence the Clinton’s still have with the Democrat party, but I can’t believe that Hillary will allow a woman other than herself to be in the history books as the first female POTUS. She believes that is her birthright. Kamala may not be the shoe-in everyone thinks she is.

    Liked by 7 people

  5. Esther says:

    Seems like HRC is behind the scenes doing her puppet master thing. Apparently, she wants a female as ODIOUS and unlikable as herself to be the Dems nominee. Of course, we all know that as evil as she is, HRC is as stark raving mad as those locked up in mental institutions. So perhaps we can excuse her for not understanding, if you keep doing the same old thing expecting different results, its only confirming HRC as certifiably pathologically insane!! She and Mrs McBeth ( cause Harris aint no lady) are two peas in a pod. V.I.C.T.O.R.Y for the deplorable is assured with Harris as nominee, even as VP. Most Blacks do not identify with that woman, and Hispanics neither like or trust her.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Kim says:

      Quite frankly, I don’t trust anyone who wants to give free healthcare to anyone, much less free healthcare to people who are not from here. Lunatics.

      Liked by 5 people

  6. Adam says:

    I suspect Harris being groomed for VP and Biden is just the sacrificial lamb. The rest are just entertainment/fundraising.

    I agree that their true candidate has yet to appear. If so, they are holding them back to avoid the circular firing squad spectacle that is our primary process.

    It sure would be nice to discover who this person is and smoke them out sooner than later.

    Liked by 1 person

    • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

      It’s possible that the real candidate could stay in the shadows all the way to the convention

      Liked by 2 people

      • A Moderate Man says:

        It’s hard for potential candidates to stay in the shadows, they have to create and hire for all of the state organizations, lease space for the HQ and engage with PR firms etc…. those activities allow people to talk or leak however you want to say it.


  7. Guyski says:

    If a dimmocrat wins, then they are stuck with all the crazy lefty folks making demands for four years. If the dimmocrat loses, then they can blame the crazy lefty folks for the loss.

    Seems if your a dimmocrat for the sole reason of raking in the money; what do you have in common with the crazy lefty folks?

    Losing once to President Trump is bad, losing twice would be catastrophic.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Nan says:

    Biden in Sumter and Orangeburg, SC today. Pathetic, he sounds like he is (1) on his last breath, and (2) has time traveled to the 1950s hammering issues on segregation, jobs (!), and disparities in race that government can do “so much more” about. Sad.

    To a standing room only crowd of 30.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Nan- he does look tired and old. My 98 year old mother in law has 10 times more get up and go than that creep.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Nan says:

        And I am sure with a heck of a lot more common sense.

        It is really sad to see a human being make such a fool of himself, get a public spanking by mistress Kamela, and ricochet from one left wing lunatic to another.

        Why? Is the lust for power so compelling? Or maybe he is so fearful of the powerful that he sees no choice but to be dangled on the puppeteers’ strings.

        Liked by 3 people

      • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

        and that’s after botox, facelift, hair transplants, and fake tanning

        Liked by 2 people

  9. Harvard Square Trumpist says:

    Kamala is to Obama as Stalin was to Trotsky. An iron-fisted Queen of Poz with all the malice and amorality of Hillary. For her to come to power would require a serious breakdown in civic order (e.g. clampdowns by Tech Overlords, voter fraud, and street violence) at levels we have not yet seen. But if that happens, it would be as part of a total Democratic sweep —- no way Kamala wins without Dems also flipping the senate and many states/districts.

    To ask whether Kamala is a favorable opponent for Trump is to ask: will there be a leftist singularity in the next 15 months? No singularity, no President Harris. If Kamala is elected, the political apocalypse arrives early (not an accident she heavily pushes gun control).

    Liked by 4 people

  10. patti says:

    Sign here: White House petition demanding 2020 Census include citizenship question
    Let the White House hear from you on the need for a citizenship question in the 2020 Census.

    An official White House petition has been created today that you can sign by clicking, adding your name and email address, and then responding to a confirmation email.
    The URL for the page where you can sign is here:

    Liked by 4 people

  11. SHV says:

    My previous speculation about Kamala Harris’s father having a South West Asian background was incorrect, however, her father’s Afro-Caribbean background doesn’t fit well with Kamal’s story of poor down trodden Black.

    From Prof Harris’s family bio:
    “My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town) and to my maternal grandmother Miss Iris (née Iris Finegan, farmer and educator, from Aenon Town and Inverness, ancestry unknown to me). The Harris name comes from my paternal grandfather Joseph Alexander Harris, land-owner and agricultural ‘produce’ exporter (mostly pimento or all-spice), who died in 1939 one year after I was born and is buried in the church yard of the magnificent Anglican Church which Hamilton Brown built in Brown’s Town (and where, as a child, I learned the catechism, was baptized and confirmed, and served as an acolyte).”

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Troublemaker10 says:

    In normal politics the ones who rise too early don’t make it to the end. Trump did break that pattern (but he is one of a kind).

    If Harris bumps Biden out over her attacks in him, I am not so sure Biden will take that lying down. He could have his surrogates take her down with him.

    I also would nit rule Bernie out. His supporters are loyal and he still has a lot of them. They also voted in high numbers in the 2016 primaries. I think they will show up when the votes are counted.

    Bernie could easily pick Tulsi Gabbard as his VP. She was one if his earliest supporters in 2016 and is a socialist also (there will be pressure from the party to pick a minority though). I don’t think Kamala is a good fit for Bernie though. He would be more inclined to pick that failed Georgia candidate.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Troublemaker10 says:

    The optics of Kamala attacking Judge Kavanaugh (with no proof, and no due process) will come back to haunt Kamala if she is the nominee. That whole thing angered America so much.

    Also, Kamala was behind the attempts to jail pro life journalist, David Daleidin, over filming (and reporting) Planned Parenthood’s attempts to sell baby parts.

    The pro life movement will also rise up against Kamala in big numbers.



    California Wants To Imprison Pro-Lifers For Committing Journalism

    Exclusive: Daleiden’s attorney says Kamala Harris colluded with Planned Parenthood to silence pro-life movement

    Daleiden, Merritt Prosecutions Halted as Calif. Supreme Court Reviews Bias Claim

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Howard Richman says:

    Wow! This report from Real Clear Politics nails it! The Mueller timeline simply does not hold up. Assange of Wikileaks announced they he had the DNC emails on June 12, 2016, over a month before he received “stolen” emails from the supposed Russia hacker Gucifer 2.0 on July 14. Assange would not have made the announcement if he hadn’t yet seen the emails because he would have needed to insure that he wasn’t being scammed.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. Bruce_Dern's_Finger says:

    The Democrat candidates need a third debate.

    Kamala Harris and Tulsi Gabbard on one side and the other contenders on the opposite side.

    Subject: Natural born Citizenship as a pre-requisite for presidential eligibility as required by the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Burnt Toast says:

      United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) has already addressed that issue:

      “The right of citizenship never descends in the legal sense, either by the common law or under the common naturalization acts. It is incident to birth in the country, or it is given personally by statute. The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle. ”

      Ignore inconvenient context or words. Read as,

      “The child of an alien, if born in the country, is a natural born citizen.”

      It is all about magic dirt, open borders, and citizens of the world.

      Liked by 1 person

      • WSB says:

        You are misreading that line.

        It says that the child born to foreigners is as much “a citizen” as the other kind. They may be both citizens if the parents are in country legally, but not a natural born citizen.

        Harris was born to two foreigners or naturalized citizens if they had their paperwork done by October 20, 1964. However, since those two needed paperwork to become citizens. she can never be a natural born citizen.


      • Bruce_Dern's_Finger says:

        Too many people complicating the natural born Citizenship issue by trying to design their own natural born Citizens with different scenarios of birth location and number of U.S. citizen parent(s).

        A natural born Citizen is a person born in the U.S.A. to two (2) U.S. citizen parents. Period.
        All other persons that are declared U.S. citizens through the 14th Amendment and citizenship laws without meeting the two U.S. citizen parents and not born in the U.S.A. are STATUTORY citizens.

        U.S. Congress can only make or declare STATUTORY citizens. A person is a natural born Citizen vial the law of nature – born in the U.S.A. to two (2) U.S. citizen parents. The U.S. Congress does not have the authority to make anyone a natural born Citizen. That is why you will not find the phrase “natural born Citizen”, stated in any law except in the first Naturalization Act (1790), that was REPEALED by the follow-on Naturalization Act of 1795.


        • jeff montanye says:

          john mccain was born in the canal zone and he ran for president. does in the u.s.a. include all u.s. military bases and u.s. ships? what about other international travel? so born in the u.s.a. is irrelevant? it’s just to two u.s. citizen parents who themselves may have “just gotten their paperwork done?” no it must be parents who were from birth u.s. citizens? stops there doesn’t it? any more and it’s starting to sound like the immaculate conception.


  16. desperatelyseekingmelania says:

    If this is the final field of Democrat candidates I’ll wring out my sweaty boxer shorts over my freedom fries prior to eating

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Anon says:

    It’s early, but I expect a Harris-Buttigieg ticket. Second guess would be Warren-Castro.


  18. The Gipper Lives says:

    The Dogeaters want Harris and Booker. That’s why they were tag-teaming the Jussie Hoax. They’re a team.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Road Rage says:

    Every former Vice President for the last 100 years who wanted the nomination of his party has received it. In other words no matter the ups and downs Biden should be a sure thing.


    • jeff montanye says:

      no one ever got elected president without prior government or military experience.
      until trump. these are interesting times.


  20. Joe says:

    What the polls primarily reveal are the current presidential preferences of the polling firms. Thus, the Dims who run YouGov want Biden to get the nomination, whereas CNN Dims and Quinnipiac Dims, especially, would like it to go to Harris. The pollsters are first and foremost preoccupied with supporting the candidate who at that moment appears to have the best chance of defeating Pres. Trump and harming whoever appears to them at the moment has the worse chance.

    Parsing the results is a grand waste of time if you lose sight of that reality.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Guyver1 says:

      Joe, you are right on target. And Quinnipiac is the worst of the worst 😨😤☠. As I explained in another post here three years ago, Quinnipiac used to call me for their ‘polls’- until I noticed that the questions in their ‘polls’ were phrased in such a way as to get, not the truth, but results they could manipulate into something entirely different 😡😠😡. The last time they called, I told them I was on to their game, then I explained the game to them so they would know I was not kidding. Then I told them to go away with their fake polls, and to never, ever call me again 😤😡😠. And they have not.


  21. Redacted says:

    Comment deleted by Admin…


  22. buanadha says:

    I have the feeling that the Democrats at the top expect to lose this one, unless there’s a crazy swing of some sort. That means this is an effort to keep the House and maybe take the Senate while prepping a bench of candidates for 2024.

    Does it help them to fire up the local elections to have a crazy at the top? or someone like Biden? Does it help them more to run someone from the radical left and have them lose (so they can get a more controllable candidate in 2024?)


    • A Moderate Man says:

      You are the first poster to make an observation like this… wow, what a statement… I DON’T KNOW WHAT TO SAY.


  23. Mike says:

    Anchor Baby Harris should catch an updraft from the Fake News Media. I can see why they’d envelop her in a bubble of Swoon, Ooh and Awe. They surely will protect the nasty scold with endless barrages of “racist, sexist, birther” and “conspiracy theorist” smears at anyone who criticizes her

    It’ll be enough to make normal people blow chunks as they convulse and shudder violently with major cases of the cringes. But lefties aren’t normal and they’ll eat up her garbage like it’s
    gourmet cuisine.


    • jeff montanye says:

      the way she got her start in politics via an adulterous affair with dem power willie brown doesn’t seem a real plus.


  24. I think you got 2 tickets here. It’s either got to be Biden-Harris or Sanders-Warren. I think Joe will have a bounce back debate.

    He might never “win” the debate if he is supposed to be the “person of reason” for the Democrat party. Sanders COULD be ther Barry Goldwater.


  25. I think you got 2 tickets here. It’s either got to be Biden-Harris or Sanders-Warren. I think Joe will have a bounce back debate.

    He might never “win” the debate if he is supposed to be the “person of reason” for the Democrat party. Sanders COULD be ther Barry Goldwater.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s