Media Polling Narrative: Crazy, Creepy, Spank-Me and How form “Top Tier”…

As anticipated the media script via democrat presidential polling narratives are now showing ‘Crazy’ and ‘Creepy’ dropping while ‘Spank-Me’ and ‘How’ gain significant positions.   CNN is now calling Biden, Harris, Warren and Sanders the ‘Top Tier’.

In a heavily promoted poll of Iowa voters, pushed hard by CNN, Creepy has dropped to 24%, Spank-Me jumps to 16%, How gains ground to 13% and Crazy drops to 9%.  All others seemingly irrelevant now.

There’s something very Big Club and Clintonesque about the DNC framework surrounding Kamala Harris.  An argument can made that she checks all the boxes for controlled candidacy.  The DNC club move to re-position California in the 2020 primary could very well be the same club motive that moved Florida in the 2016 cycle for the GOP club.

Unlike the GOP in 2016, in the DNC 2020 race there are no ‘outsiders‘; so the club rules mean more control.  [The DNC 2020 is akin to the RNC in 2012.]

Those who watched the Kamala Harris launch January 21st; then the Jussie Smollett fake MAGA lynching on January 29th; then the Feb 14th lynch legislation, and then connected the seemingly pushed narrative (all bearing the familiar sniff of Clinton Politcal-Ops) are undoubtedly noting how Harris’s campaign hired Marc Elias, who heads Perkins Coie’s political law group and was Hillary’s campaign lawyer in 2016.

If the media narrative is following the DNC script, then it does seem likely Biden was thrown into the race as a toxic white-male pinata positioned to draw the attention of the party goers.  Everyone taking a turn beating Creepy Joe then helps reset the race dynamic as the visible white male is beaten into submission.

Obviously, under this scenario, Crazy Bernie will cash-out (sell his data) before he gets hoisted into pinata position #2.

The aligned media will never allow Kamala Harris to be vetted and will defend her interests at all costs.

Unfortunately for all other candidates; and following the modern problem with media influence; the media will pick their favorite candidate and determine who gets face-time in the debates.   Despite the brutally obvious 2016 example of Bernie -vs- Hillary most grassroots democrats still have not recognized the Big Club is scripting their nominee.

Here’s the narrative as engineered and distributed:

The first Democratic debate has reshaped the presidential field in Iowa, surging support for California Sen. Kamala Harris, undercutting the standing of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and raising questions about the solidity of former vice president Joe Biden’s frontrunner status.

In a new Suffolk University/USA TODAY Poll, Biden continues to lead the field, backed by 24% of those who say they are likely to attend the Democratic caucuses in Iowa that open the presidential contests next year. But Harris has jumped to second place, at 16%, leapfrogging over Sanders, whose support sagged to single digits. At 9%, he finished fourth, behind Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 13%. (more)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

258 Responses to Media Polling Narrative: Crazy, Creepy, Spank-Me and How form “Top Tier”…

  1. Jeff P. says:

    The coat is Almost as Hideous as Camel-a.

    Liked by 11 people

    • dottygal says:

      It looks like something the ape-in-heels would wear.

      Liked by 5 people

      • Pedro Morales says:

        SD, This is so awesome!
        PDJT was correct in going after Biden. He was the main threat. Creepy Joe has lots of appeal in WI, MI, OH, and PA. The Dems need to flip some of these to win. But they just could not help themselves. They want to go left/progressive/identity politics to purify the party. Submarine the last of the old, moderate, white, guys and embrace their inner socialism. She has no shot. She will not play in the Midwest. I do not buy it. I think there is indeed an internal fight going on in the Dem party and in the MSM. In their heads they know the logical candidate is Biden. But their virtue signaling and social justice mentality crave a Black (Or psuedo Indian) woman. Finishing off Biden is the best news Brad Parscale could hope for.

        Liked by 12 people

        • Mike says:

          I don’t think she can beat Trump because she’s so finking UNLIKABLE. The more people see her, the more they will come to loathe her.

          Liked by 8 people

        • bertdilbert says:

          The dems have to take Florida to win and do not think Kamala will be able to pull that off. She is a non starter. Clinton must have her claws in the background.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Never mind Trump accepting it, I don’t think the country will accept a certain death sentence if she wins.

            PLus, with such a huge portion of the US supporting borders and her denial, Trump has a target rich opponent.

            Liked by 3 people

          • SwampRatTerrier says:

            But Dems know they can Steal the CA primary,
            just like Hillary stole it from Bernie in 2016……..imo

            Liked by 2 people

          • dd_sc says:

            Dade County vote fraud/harvesting in the 2018 midterms was the trial run for 2020.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Donald says:

            Hello Bert:
            I much agree with your assertion here about Kamala (hadn’t thought of it, but true and a very significant point!).
            Also, don’t think that out here in the vast empty spaces, some of us don’t deeply admire your extraordinary wit and sense of humor. Many thanks for the great laughs!
            So what do you think of Sundance’s tremendous collage that ends his post?
            Extraordinarily funny, isn’t it? In fact, I consider it brilliant… the kind of thing you can ponder over and over, and takes its place next to other hilarious creations that leave their mark!
            A Happy 4th to you!

            Like

            • bertdilbert says:

              The collage is great, it actually is a great depiction of the democrat party. As funny as the featured contestants are, the added spice is the kiddie table at the top! If Trump was to tweet it, the media would stare down the cmeras with their most serious faces and tell us it is a doctored photo – without showing the photo of course.

              Sad state of affairs when a country of 330 million people, this Is the best field the democrats can come up with.

              I love doing the humor. I also enjoy reading and laughing as some of the wit other produce here. Have a great 4th as well!

              Like

        • Daniel says:

          While the INTENTION is to get Biden tossed out, that may not be what happens. STILL in the lead and pretty strongly in the lead at that. People mostly choose their candidates at the start and don’t often change much until their candidate concedes. There are variabilities in that we don’t know what portion of Biden’s 24% is solid for Biden and what portion isn’t. But right now, Biden is the winner.

          Are we going to see the secret emails from this current plan? Maybe, maybe not. I’m with Sundance in that this intent is pretty plain and obvious and it could be Biden is the “Proxy Trump” which proves she can beat Trump in the general.

          Iowa is no longer “important.” Ted Cruz won Iowa. Trump won the primaries and the presidency.

          I think Biden is far too popular and they are going to have to nuke him by bringing out his corrupt and criminal behavior. The problem is that this will also throw Obama under that same bus so they should be reluctant to do such a thing.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Dutchman says:

            Agree Karmalas plan was to use Biden as a pinata, to show she would be ‘best’ at attacking “Trump”.
            I also think she is TRYING to be the Democrat Trump in the primaries, i.e. attacking Biden (in her perception) the way Trump attacked Jeb

            Problems abound, of coarse. She has,adopted the same positions as all the others; PDJT stood out, early on for unabashedly rejecting the positions the others all pretty much embraced.

            Secondly, even those of us who ‘get’and support PDJT, would be hard pressed to know how to emulate his success.
            Libs REALLY don’t ‘get Trump’, (IMHO, many treepers don’t, either) and how can you emulate him, when you don’t even understand his unique ‘style’?

            Its a clown show, and regardless who wins the nomination, PDJT will be running against the policies of Bernie Sanders, but this time it will HAVE to be a skirt.

            THATS baked in, to cash in on the angst of those who were,SOOOO set on having a Madam POTUS, that they were willing to overlook Hillary’s mountain of negatives.

            Will the young turks be fooled, yet again? Probably, if karmala is the nominee. PDJT will make mincemeat of her, but that would be true, no matter who they run.

            Liked by 3 people

        • SwampRatTerrier says:

          Remember Willie’s Kamala is not African-American and comes from a Slave Owning Family!

          Way to go Kamala. You got the Jacket Hillary Clinton told you to get.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Prof. Woland says:

          Harris also has a problem in that America does not have the same white guilt trip that it had when it elected Obama. I think she feels that she will be untouchable but running against Trump will not be like running against McCain or Romney. It will be good for the country to have her play the angry black scold thinking we will be afraid of her. We won’t and she will lose all 50 states.

          Liked by 2 people

        • “finishing off Biden..” As another poster phrased it, “Biden is their Old White Pinata to take turns thrashing..” Next, come Bernie, then another. Finally the rabid, sky screaming nightmare candidate will be left standing.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Mr e-man says:

        Like Joseph’s coat of many colors. All she needs is some goat blood. Or Biden blood.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Alfred Brown says:

        Hillary had a pink tweedy Mao tent that everyone fawned over. This is Kamala’s turn at the same media event.
        Neither wore it any better.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Akindole says:

      Strikingly extra-big-bag-top Clintonesque, no?

      Liked by 4 people

      • Hoop says:

        A small upgrade from Hillary’s ‘Chairman Mao’ collection of designer fashion wear, so popular in 2016!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Akindole,
        And I can swear that if i was not looking at the video and just listening, then I would have thought it was Hillary’s cackle.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Pedro Morales says:

        Several insiders have stated that they set this race up for Biden. He would be the only moderate and they would flood the zone with crazy lefties to divide the Bernie vote. All Joe had to do was stay over 30% and he could wrap things up early. He has had multiple gaffes since Day 1- China, Obama endorsement, Anita Hill, abortion, busing, the Hyde amendment, plagarism on the website, the gay comment. He was lost at the debate. He could not keep it together for 2 months! He is a goner. Its over. They are gonna move on to Kamel-toe and Liar-watha

        Liked by 2 people

        • The Demon Slick says:

          Biden went down because Obama gave them the green light. And if the DOJ wasn’t still filthy dirty, Kamalas ties to the Smollet hoax would have already been exposed. She coordinated with him and her bill against hate crimes. Then there’s the former occupy wall street, former cnn contributing editor Jason Kessler who suddenly appeared as a white supremacist in Charlottesville then vanished again, probably back to stuffing envelopes at OFA. Raiding that journalist in San Franpoopsco… but I’m getting sidetracked here. My point is they have the evidence against Kamala Harris from the investigation of Smollet sending himself white powder. It’s frustrating to see them still operating under a political agenda.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Your Tour Guide says:

            Jason Kessler?

            The world’s WORST actor?

            The complete caricature of what the lefties
            think a white supremacist is, that one?

            Find some old videos with him on it, and
            watch him in action. The bogus just rolls off him.

            He probably disappeared because he got a fat
            check for starring in the Charlottesville “production”.

            “Production” is in quotes, because it was all theater.
            An opportunity to make Trump and his supporter look
            like violent racists. Which is why the MSM relentlessly
            continue to cite it.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Herbert Kroll says:

              For a while, I liked Scott Adam’s video’s. Eventually, there were too many warning signals to trust his opinions, one of them being that he keeps bringing up Charlotteville, without questioning anything that happened there. Identity politics need puppets on either side of the aisle. Lots of false flags are created, especially in Europe. Like in Sweden where a uniformed neighborhood watch popped up that was never to be seen again. Generation Identitaire, Pegida, I’m quite sure that such entities are fake.

              Like

      • S.Bishop says:

        Perhaps we can also add in the haircut and dental cleaning montage video dreamed up by Beto…

        Like

    • j says:

      A “coat of many colors.” (Gen 37 – chosen?)
      “Update: she bought the jacket”

      Liked by 2 people

    • TarsTarkas says:

      Calamity Harris and her AmazingTechni-color coat!

      Liked by 4 people

    • The jacket has as much style as Hillary’s Oven Mitt Collection😜

      Liked by 4 people

    • SwampRatTerrier says:

      It’s a jacket Hillary would wear.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. cheryl says:

    Something about her makes my skin crawl. I loathe her and everything she stands for. She’s the chosen one this election for the Dems and they’re going to do their best to overlook that she’s where she is because of being on her knees in Willie Brown’s office, her family owned slaves, and she’s not black. And she is an anchor baby.

    She’s going to be badly fooled if she thinks PDT won’t bring up her past. She only has to remember the look on Bill Clinton’s face when Trump brought his rape victims to the debate that time.

    Liked by 18 people

    • snellvillebob says:

      Kamela has no African features other than an olive skin color which can be found on most of the Italian people. One has to wonder if her parents never told her she was adopted? Or if she knows about it and is hiding it to get affirmative action benefits.

      Liked by 4 people

      • ristvan says:

        Mother is from India. Father is Jamaican, which means mixed race of white European, African slave, and Caribbean native Americans, maybe with some south American mixed race thrown in as Jamaica was once a trade hub. They met while teaching at Stanford with green cards.
        So Kamela is anything but her self identified African American. And she has plenty of other dirty laundry as well.

        Liked by 9 people

        • SwampRatTerrier says:

          RE: “So Kamela is anything but her self identified African American. And she has plenty of other dirty laundry as well.”

          JUST LIKE OBAMA!

          Liked by 2 people

      • Snellville- you bring up a good point about many of the so called “African American” and/or “Black” politicians. I have Sicilians in my family who have much darker skin tones than most of them.

        Liked by 2 people

      • bertdilbert says:

        Kamala lost her African features due to a bussing accident.

        Liked by 6 people

        • Baby Hurley says:

          Yeah, kinda like when you drop a fully adorned Mr. Potato Head on the hardwood floor.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Dutchman says:

            So, a phoney black (again) with a phoney Amerind as VP, but this time BY GOSH they are BOTH WOMEN!

            Cause, after Hillary, THATS the impotent thing, we MUST have a Madam POTUS! Yeah, THATS gonna work!

            And yes, I MEANT ‘impotent’, as thats what the Dems are.

            Liked by 1 person

            • jnr2d2 says:

              Point: Have you ever noticed that all the “black” political stars are, or look, half white/black. Obama, Holder, Jesse Jackson, Sharpton, Kamala, Valery Jarrett, Booker, etc. Never a true “black” American. I guess they feel that a light skin black is acceptable to whites — isn’t that racist? After all, a true black like Clarence Thomas or Herman Cane must be destroyed, or they may Pied Piper the black vote away from the Demo Plantation.

              Liked by 1 person

              • Dutchman says:

                Truth is, historically Democrat party should have been obsolete a long time ago.
                Historically the country has always been majority center right. After the Civil war,,ALL blacks who could voted Republican. Hence Democrat support for planned parenthood. KKK and Jim Crow kept South from being permanent Republican majority, and big city Dem policies kept blacks in ghettos, dependant and so voting Dem.
                Only reason Democrat party hasn’t gone way of whigs, a long time ago.

                Liked by 1 person

            • Herbert Kroll says:

              Do not underestimate the strength and influence of the (international) women’s networks (let’s call it that) in (foreign) politics. Women’s quota are just about the easiest way to put your cronies in positions of power. Playing the women’s card was an integral part of Obama/Clinton’s “smart diplomacy” effort. In practice, most of these set ups fell flat, because the person’s involved were just too unlikable to the public. Priyanka Ghandi of the Indian Congress Party is a clear example of propping up such a globalist puppet in another country’s political affairs, an undertaking that just went nowhere, luckily.

              Like

              • Dutchman says:

                Unfortunately, we make false and really absurd associations; human nature. Vote for a black, if your black cause he/she will represent YOUR interests. Worked out real good with Obummer/s.

                Vote for a VETERAN, worked out great with mcstain, Kerry,..even Mueller gained some traction from it.
                And yeah, if your hispanic vote for cruz or rubio. If your woman vote for Hillary or spank me.

                ACTIONS, not WORDS, color, gender etc. need to be the criterion. And yes, those who would ‘game’ the system use ALL these aspects of ‘human nature’, ‘tribal identity’ in this case. Sad,..

                Like

    • Pedro Morales says:

      She is a gift for the Trump campaign. Biden was the biggest threat. Trump picked on him and acted like he was the favorite. He goaded the others to challenge him. They avoided the circular firing squad on DNC orders. POTUS kept at it. Rudy pretending to go to Ukraine was awesome! Then POTUS stood back and let the other candidates do his dirty work. They are destroying Joe Biden and PDJT fingerprints are not at the crime scene. The media is now destroying Hunter Biden with a bunch of new articles. EPIC! I am more confident about 2020. Biden was a threat. He is being gutted by alol of his former friends! Enjoy the payback Joe.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Charles Morgan, M.D. says:

        On the contrary, I don’t believe Biden was ever a real threat. He has been judged a threat based on past experience but he has aged greatly both physically and cognitively in the past few years. I thought from the outset that his Dem competitors would make mincemeat out of him. And Harris has already done so, exposing his mental slowness.

        Liked by 3 people

        • vladdy says:

          Agree. Surprised so many see him as a threat–esp to PDT’s outspokenness and esp after the past 2 years. Remember when all he did at the VP debate with Ryan was laugh for an hour? And Ryan and the moderator let him? Can you imagine him trying to pull that with PDT? I never thought he was “a thing” with anyone except the media—all that phony “lunch bucket Joe” stuff the media put on him, when everybody knows he’s grown rich doing nothing but pretending to work in the government…Would have loved to see him against DT. Too bad.

          Like

      • Mr e-man says:

        I expected this first debate to be more circle the wagons and Orange man bad stuff. Kamala’s handlers set her to go for the jugular on day 1. The rest were stunned she did so. Now they are pissed she stole the limelight while they were doing the Orange man bad routine. That wasn’t their tacit agreement. The knives will come out at the next debate as they fight for limited endorsement dollars. Those 4 front runners will be the target.

        Liked by 3 people

        • littleanniefannie says:

          Kamala’s Handlers—that would be Perez, Ellison, Elias and O’Failure? She may need a little more couch time to get more endorsements.

          Liked by 1 person

      • dbobway says:

        I believe the left figure to lose to PDJT, in 2020, unless they can talk him into nuking somebody. Which is not going to happen. When Joe Biden is the best middle of the road candidate for the Democrats? Their in trouble.

        It will be hard to cheat their way out of this. But they will surely try.
        It gives them 4 more years for the FBI to prove the Russians
        Helped candidate Trump win in 2016.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jeff C-C says:

        The convention in Milwaukee will be tons of fun. She’s not exactly a “beer and shot” kind of gal. She’s gonna go over like last night’s spaghetti (when you get around to putting it away the next morning).

        Like

    • Cetera says:

      Might be kinda fun to have it clearly acknowledged by a major political party that the only thing that matters for women in politics is how much **** they’ve sucked and how great their ***s looked. Feminism has truly made women into meat. No one gives a crap about what’s between their ears or in their hearts, but rather only about what they are willing to let men do to them in exchange for power and money.

      And all those poor women who think a sex strike is going to work out for them… If it wasn’t so XXX rated, it could make for good comedy, if you like dark comedies that only make you cry in despair.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Mike says:

      “Something about her makes my skin crawl.”

      Me too. I am no fan of Joe Biden by any means, but the vicious shot she took at him actually left me a little shaken. I felt, if anything, some compassion for poor Sleepy Joe

      From a male perceptive, it was a verbal sucker punch right to the genitals. In crude terms, she’s a castrating bitch. Something that registers most unpleasant in the male psyche.

      But she is really good at pandering the leftists and all their little fantasies. And she’s not only a woman, but non-white and those are good cards to play from a leftist perspective

      She worries me a bit.

      Liked by 4 people

      • decisiontime16 says:

        Kamala’s husband,

        Since the politician had said she did not believe in long engagements, they were married a little over four months after their engagement in a private ceremony at the Santa Barbara Courthouse, according to The Chronicle.

        They wrote their own vows, and to recognize Emhoff’s faith, the two honored a time-tested Jewish tradition and broke a glass.

        He is more than ready to support Harris as our first “First Man.”

        https://www.oprahmag.com/entertainment/a25905360/kamala-harris-husband-douglas-emhoff/

        Like

      • Aeyrie says:

        Que Mala should worry you more than a little bit. Your instincts are good, Mike. She is a vicious B*tch. No one should turn their back on her. Like I said up thread, she’s Hillary 2.0!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Bitterc says:

        Exactly. I, too, thought that her attack on Joe was a dirty sucker punch.

        Remember, most of America had never heard of her. I don’t think debate night made a very good impression on those that were unfamiliar with her.

        The question is, do the majority of Dem voters choose a candidate based on policy or are they looking for the meanest SOB they think is needed to take Trump down?

        Hopefully her flip flop flip on eliminating private insurance earns her a debate mod that pins her down on that once and for all. That’s about the only significant issue these commies differ on

        Like

    • SwampRatTerrier says:

      Willie is the only thing brown about Kamala.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Eagle61 says:

      Kamala Harris is truly a very unlikable woman. However, just imagine someone like Michelle Obama entering the race sometime after the screaming lunatics finish off Joe Biden. I shudder to think of that potential. To be honest though, i don’t think MO has the mental or emotional stability to withstand the rigors of a a campaign, much less the Presidency, God forbid!

      Liked by 1 person

      • cheryl says:

        She could even pick Mooshelle to be her running mate. I shudder to think of either of them close to the Presidency.

        Like

  3. Cetera says:

    Despite the brutally obvious 2016 example of Bernie -vs- Hillary most grassroots democrats still have not recognized the Big Club is scripting their nominee./

    Don’t expect a lot of movement on that front. There’s nothing new under the sun, and no intelligence or ability to self-assess present in most Dem voters. It is all about them and normalizing whatever deviancy they enjoy, with a large side of making sure they suffer no consequences from their choices. At this point it is no longer possible to differentiate Democrats from narcissistic demons.

    As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
    There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
    That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
    And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

    And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
    When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
    As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
    The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

    Liked by 8 people

    • Cetera says:

      Well, that formatting got jacked up…

      Despite the brutally obvious 2016 example of Bernie -vs- Hillary most grassroots democrats still have not recognized the Big Club is scripting their nominee.

      Don’t expect a lot of movement on that front. There’s nothing new under the sun, and no intelligence or ability to self-assess present in most Dem voters. It is all about them and normalizing whatever deviancy they enjoy, with a large side of making sure they suffer no consequences from their choices. At this point it is no longer possible to differentiate Democrats from narcissistic demons.

      As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
      There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
      That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
      And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

      And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
      When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
      As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
      The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

      Liked by 4 people

  4. BestBets says:

    Guess it will be up to us to get the word out on Heels Up Harris, since the MSM (the propaganda arm of the DNC) won’t do it. I think we’re up to the challenge.

    Liked by 4 people

    • vikingmom says:

      Unfortunately, Kamala learned from the “best” how to deflect every single criticism by claiming “racism”! She is Barack Obama’s protegee and the media will fall over themselves to completely subvert ANY negative stories about her, just like them did with him. There are still many, many people in this country who have no idea of any of the questions about Hussein’s past and they continue to spout the “Only scandal free administration” in US History.

      If there is not more pushback this time around, the same thing will happen again, but thankfully, this time we have a candidate who doesn’t hesitate to speak the truth and I, for one, can’t wait to see him dismantle Harris’ phony lies and socialist schemes!

      Liked by 4 people

      • vikingmom,
        “this time we have a candidate who doesn’t hesitate to speak the truth”

        I agree. President Trump is no whom-we-shall-not-name, who pulled the stunt of cancelling his campaign weeks before election due to a “crisis” nor the one to hold back if whom he runs against has middle name of Hussein.

        Sometimes I pity the ignorance of the general populace in this country related to Islam religion. Go to a country like Indonesia and even a four year old will tell you that if you have Hussein “anywhere” in your name then what religion you will belong too. In fact, he will be greeted with “Asalaamu Alaykum” and not “Good Morning / Afternoon/Evening” by that four year old.

        What is ironic though is, why a politician will have a need to hide his religion?

        Disclaimer – I am not a Muslim-hating person. I had few very good Muslim friends in my younger (college) days and since have lost touch with them long time ago. Many of these friends from younger days would sport their typical beard later as they grow older (nothing against that either). I still have only one very good Muslim friend whom I met in this country, but he has been the only one (in his 30’s or 40’s) whom I have come across in my entire life who would not pray 5 times a day or fast during their holy month. Maybe that is one reason why we are still friends – he never drags the name of his god in our conversation …. ever…. and we have been friends for past almost 20 years now.

        Liked by 1 person

        • thinkwell says:

          Sadly, the majority of musselmen would consider your secular moslem friend to be a turncoat apostate, Many would like to see him pay with his life for his “crime.”

          Like

      • patti says:

        “She is Barack Obama’s protegee ”

        Exactly,vikingmom, and she’ll get the ‘O’ treatment….but that was before Trump

        Liked by 2 people

      • Mr e-man says:

        She threw the race card at the first debate. “I don’t think you are a racist BUT….”

        She is a vapid twit with no morals. She should be no where near the oval office.

        Liked by 3 people

  5. sundance says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • Pedro Morales says:

      The memes are gonna be epic!

      Liked by 5 people

    • Mr e-man says:

      Her cackle is just as bad as Hillary’s. It’s just weird.

      Liked by 1 person

    • rvsueandcrew says:

      I’m ashamed to admit that I feel like slapping her face every time I see her photo. There’s something about her that brings up an irrational, immediate dislike. (BTW, I’m female.)

      Liked by 2 people

      • Aeyrie says:

        Rvsue, your instincts about Que Mala are as good as Mike’s above. She will not be able to help outing herself. What we witnessed at the first debate is just the beginning. Vicious is who she is, and everybody will see it but the Dems. Those poor deluded souls will see another Hillary and have stars in their eyes. PDJT will take care of that right quick if her connection to the the Smollett business doesn’t find its way into the light first.

        Liked by 3 people

        • lansdalechip says:

          But a large number of voters will vote for her, no matter simply (Freudian slip) because she’s apparently female, and it’s time, and, and, and….

          Like

      • Mike says:

        What makes you think your dislike is irrational?

        Like

        • rvsueandcrew says:

          I get your point, Mike. The urge to slap her has nothing to do with her politics, her past, her associations with evil people, her dubious character, or anything like that (although those things are slap-deserving).

          Looking objectively as possible….. She has a pleasant enough face, smooth skin, normal features, not deformed or repugnant, yet I have a strong, immediate, negative reaction to her face and expressions.

          It’s that thing where you like or don’t like a person at first sight.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Richie says:

      Obamas choice. No surprise.

      Like

  6. thinkwell says:

    The founders and even most politicians up through the first three fourths of the twentieth century would be aghast at the concept of anchor babies. Kamala Harris, who was born to alien citizens here on temporary student visas at the time, is only improperly considered a citizen at birth because of the perversion of modern courts and politicians in treating the Constitution as a “living document” so that they can interpret it however they please. This anchor baby nonsense all started with Justice William J. Brennan’s footnote in Plyler v. Doe in 1982 and was pushed into high-gear USA-destruct-mode by the evil Ted Kennedy.

    Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states:

    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. […]

    Consider the following two unassailable points.

    1) The text of Section 1 clearly states that it only applies to residents of a state. Illegal invaders or other temporary visitors and their spawn have no legal permanent residence in any state. They are trespassing aliens or are tourists, students, etc. whose legal permanent residence is in an alien land, not one of our states.

    2) The subject of Section 1 is citizenship, so when considering jurisdiction, only political jurisdiction is relevant. The political jurisdiction of alien invaders, tourists, students and other temporary visitors and any spawn they might happen to drop is their home country. That is where they vote, and where they are citizens. The fact that they are subject to local criminal jurisdiction is irrelevant to questions of citizenship.

    By the correct, originalist interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Kamala Harris should not be a citizen at all. On top of that, she was raised in Canada during her most formative years by a radical leftist single mother. She is just like aka obama, an anti-American citizen of the world.

    Liked by 8 people

    • ristvan says:

      Lurking Lawyer here. NOPE. Posted on this before.

      There are two keys to understanding 14A§1. First, its legislative history. It was passed in 1866 and ratified in 1868, to deal with the citizenship of emancipated slaves born in the US. Legislative history makes clear the ‘and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ clause was expressly to exclude Native Americans on reservations and.children of accredited diplomats, neither fully subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

      The precedent controlling Kamela Harris is the 1898 SCOTUS decision US v Wong Kim Ark. it correctly reasoned that since his parents were both in the US legally, and not working in any fashion for or with the Chinese government, that he was born a US citizen.
      Harris parents were both in the US legally, and met while teaching at Stanford. She is a US citizen.

      As to ‘natural born citizen’, the closest precedent is a SCOTUS case (cannot find my notes) in the 1950’s saying the only legal difference between a naturalized citizen and a citizen is that the former cannot be president.

      As to the 1982 Plyler v Doe obiter dictum (not precedent) you are correct it is wrong, but not because of state residency. The correct legal way to think about illegals anchor babies is simple. They are by definition here illegally, so were never ‘fully subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ in the same way that children of diplomats aren’t. Do diplomats and their children have to follow US law? Yes. And if they don’t, they are expelled back to their home country. Same thing for illegal aliens.
      Unfortunately, no case has (yet) been brought to test this pretty solid legal perspective, and Congress has passed unconstitutional anchor baby legislation. Perhaps a PDJT task after the 2020 election landslide.

      Liked by 9 people

      • GB Bari says:

        So “diplomatic immunity” is a myth?

        Like

        • ristvan says:

          No. Its real, and why children of diplomats are NOT anchor babies.

          Like

          • GB Bari says:

            I always understood (perhaps in error) that “diplomatic immunity” meant that foreign diplomats could not be sued or prosecuted for breaking U.S. laws while in our country (although they could be expelled).

            Like

      • KnowSERENo Fear says:

        With all respect, your a lawyer, not a Constitutional scholar. Yes the law is in your favor. But the law is moot in this case. The Constitution says POTUS must be natural born citizen. Below, I’ve cited a Constitutional scholar who provides AMPLE evidence, reference, and context for natural born citizen…BOTH PARENTS AMERICAN CITIZENS AT TIME OF BIRTH.

        The law can NOT change the Constitution…only an amendment to the Constitution can change the Constitution. Precedent can not change the Constitution. Judges can not change the Constitution. A court opinion can not change the Constitution. The SCOTUS can not change the Constitution. ONLY AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION CAN CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION!

        Since the qualifications for the POTUS comes from the Constitution, one must go to the source document for reference. If my oven breaks…I look at my oven’s service manual for answers…not a recipe book.

        It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that our Framers wanted a person with sole allegiance to the States to represent the States in foreign matters. At the time, many monarchs were intertwine with other governments via marriage…nations were rife with conflicts of interests.

        Liked by 5 people

        • thinkwell says:

          @KnowSERENo Fear: Your common sense sanity is refreshing. Thank you.

          Liked by 1 person

        • ristvan says:

          With due respect to a fellow Treeper, unless you can show you are both a lawyer AND a constitutional scholar, your ‘common sense’ opinion should carry NO weight.

          Interpreting the Constitution, as Former Justice Scalia’s 1000+ page book showed, is not about common sense. I read it. You can too, cheap on Amazon Kindle: Scalia and Garner, Reading Law: The interpretation of legal texts.

          Liked by 1 person

      • rashomon says:

        ristvan, who is “of standing” to sue for her removal from the Democrat ballot? Thank you.

        Liked by 1 person

        • ristvan says:

          No one, because she is plainly eligible.

          Liked by 3 people

          • rashomon says:

            No, she is NOT a natural born citizen, born of CITIZEN parents. She is a NATIVE born citizen, born of two parents legally in residence and under the jurisdiction of the United States’ laws and protections. Wong Kim Ark (U.S. vs. 1898) was born in 1873 of parents who were legally in the U.S. at the time of his birth, so he, too, was native-born..

            That legal brouhaha was (some sort of propaganda?) over the changes made by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 forbidding Chinese from immigrating to the U.S.,but he was already recognized as a native born U.S. citizen and seeking to reenter after visiting his parents in China.

            Like

          • BitterC says:

            Ristvan, if I am understanding you correctly, your position is that “natural born citizen” is simply someone that received citizenship by being born here, as opposed to foreigners that go thru naturalization.

            Back when I was in school, many many years ago, it seems to me we were taught the founders did not want some European royal moving here then getting elected. I just wonder what they would have thought if some European prince came here, made a baby and either left it here or took back to Europe to raise and the child returned as an adult and ran for president.

            That would basically be the Obama situation & there seems to be some question about whether Kam’s mom ever even became a US citizen. Can’t even find a straight answer as to when, exactly, they moved to Canada.

            Back when Obama was running I spent hours reading differing legal views by supposed Constitutional lawyers about what was meant by NBC. I think it’s safe to say it’s not settled law & sadly the spineless GOP, fearing the label of “racist” [even tho they will never stop calling conservatives racist,never] blew the opportunity to get a SCOTUS ruling.

            Course, Obama allowing/encouraging the red herring of his place of birth to dominate the discussion allowed the non citizenship of his father to fly under the radar,

            Like

      • thinkwell says:

        As they say, you are assuming facts not in evidence. The ruling of US versus Wong Kim Ark was deliberately very limited in its scope. First off, it only found that Wong Kim Ark was a citizen. It most definitely did not find that he was a natural born Citizen as only his citizenship status was in question before the court. Also, the ruling only applies the 14th Amendment to a very limited set of circumstances, that is to the USA born children of permanent legal resident aliens prevented by law from becoming citizens (the parallel to the children of slaves is not perfect, but strong).

        Kamala Harris’s parents were here in the USA on temporary student visas at the time when she was born and they were never banned from obtaining USA citizenship (which, in fact, they both did later in life). Her birth circumstances simply do fall under the limited ruling of US versus Wong Kim Ark, and regardless of any modern misinterpretation to the contrary, the ruling at best only makes her a (statutory born) citizen, not a natural born Citizen. If President Trump presses this, he will prevail.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Debra says:

      I am in complete agreement with your assessment, and believe the only way to counter her is by informing voters — such that they will not vote for her — in a word of mouth manner, because we do not need another ‘issue’ for our VSGPDJT to have to take on.

      Not to mention the co-heads of the DNC claiming eligibility on her behalf and any query into her parentage being assailed as racist, which will be attached to him if he personally pursues it.

      It is up to WE THE PEOPLE to keep our Constitution intact and our Republic standing.

      Like

    • KnowSERENoFear says:

      For those that desire to read more on the subject on why Harris is not eligible for POTUS.

      https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/

      BTW…this is NOT a matter of legal interpretation, but rather, a matter of Constitutional interpretation. Lawyers have no more insight on this topic than AOC.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Mncpo(ret) says:

    I really didn’t think the DNC would pick Kam. I thought there would be an “outside” savior at the last minute, but her hiring of Perkins Coie’s pretty much seals the deal, she’s the CHOSEN.

    I don’t understand their thinking. She’s a dirty AG that has a horrible standing in her own state! Maybe they think there are enough idiots and illegals that will vote as directed.

    She, honestly doesn’t stand a chance. Maybe a throw-away candidate to concentrate on 2024?

    Liked by 10 people

    • deepdivemaga says:

      Might be getting too late at this point, but perhaps she is paving the way for a Michelle Obama entrance?

      Liked by 3 people

      • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

        I don’t think it’s too late ’til after Thanksgiving

        Like

      • cantcforest says:

        I share your concern. Both unlikable, little class or depth, no moral foundation to speak of…. Also of note, Hillary got her law license back…and now I have to go rest.

        Like

      • Mary Wilson says:

        That’s what I’m expecting that the DNC will do at the convention. Presto chango!

        Like

      • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

        Would think that the democrats might have learned their lesson about plugging in a past president’s wife thinking she would be able to win on name recognition alone. It don’t work that way!

        Like

      • graphiclucidity says:

        You really think Kamala Harris seems like the type of person who would run for president, get some momentum in the polls, and then willingly step aside for some other woman who has never run for public office?

        Not likely.
        Kamala is too arrogant and ambitious to ever pull that one off.

        Liked by 2 people

      • vladdy says:

        Agree. I think some “rising star” types in the party were offered the chance to get some face time on TV and maybe bolster their chances in 2024, but they’re placeholders. Harris may be the mid-of-honor with the bride waiting in the wings.

        Like

    • Mncpo: That’s your problem, you Don’t Think like the Alinsky Leaders.
      They think they are geniuses.
      Heels-Up Harris has a very angry and arrogant persona; can’t take that away and who does that remind you of? Same election, same strategy, same candidates…….Hhmmm….

      Liked by 3 people

      • Your Tour Guide says:

        “A very angry and arrogant persona”.

        Amen. And, wouldn’t it be too easy to have some
        videos showing that side of her? The Kavanaugh
        hearings come to mind. Time to introduce her to
        the populace.

        Liked by 2 people

    • The Boss says:

      Marc Elias may be playing a role like Lanny Davis did for Michael Cohen – making sure his “client” is not a threat to the Clinton syndicate’s interests.

      Like

    • gawntrail says:

      I think its double-dealing by the DNC honchos. All the radical crazies in full bloom for all to see, support and vote for. Only to be wiped out, decisively, by Trump. Then it will be back to the old ways and the radicals will take their rightful place at the kids table…. because, who are they going to vote for?…. a Republican?

      The Big Club is always pulling the strings.

      Like

    • GB Bari says:

      A lot of people thought Obozo didn’t have a chance either, when he first announced his candidacy. The DemoncRATs have the entire media and entertainment industries ready to push any meme, narrative, or candidate the Dems want. They also now have the entire social media industry working for them. It’s far more rigged than the previous election cycle.

      President Trump is the better candidate by a country mile, regardless of who they anoint. But the truth about the fraud in DC has been on life support for several years. And President Trump is not getting support from a majority of Republicans on trade and immigration policies, two core MAGA issues in the President’s platform. The economy is quite good but we can all see the MSM working 24/7 to throw cold water on the public perception of the economy and, as is the DemocRAT Media’s usual modus operandi, to generate as much doubt and fear about the future as possible.

      It’s doubly maddening when we see the endless lies about PDJT, and then contrast that with Sundance’s excellent analysis of the transparently fraudulent DemoncRAT political machinations to anoint a candidate based on superficial marketing criteria instead of genuine political skill and credible intellect.

      Heels Up Harris by all rights should be easy to beat. If she’s actually the Dimms’ ultimate choice (I’m not seeing it) their national convention will be an interesting “spectacle.”

      Like

      • littleanniefannie says:

        Not to mention O’Failure and Creepy out there taking credit for what happened AFTER PDJT was elected (in sharp contrast to the years before). why not just call her Screw Up? After all, didn’t she screw her way up the ladder of “success”?

        Like

  8. thinkwell says:

    Kamala Harris is only about 20 to 30 percent black through her Jamaican side (none through her Indian side). She has absolutely zero black American ancestry. She is a pandering poser.

    But the elephant-in-the-room is that she is not even a natural born Citizen as her parents were both alien citizens here on temporary student visas at the time of her birth. She is a 14th Amendment statutory born citizen naturalized by (misinterpreted) law at birth.

    Liked by 9 people

    • fanbeav says:

      Don’t worry….all records will be sealed. Only conservatives must disclose everything – even tax returns years before running for president!

      Like

    • saywhat64 says:

      POTUS Trump has a clear legal standing to challenge her eligibility before the election. SCOTUS will not be able to evade this time if Trump makes a legal challenge.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mr e-man says:

        I think the Speaker of the House certifies the eligibility. That would be Nancy, who also certified Baracky Obamas eligibility even though it is impossible for her to have seen a valid birth certificate.

        Like

    • ristvan says:

      Thinkwell, posted on this yet again upthread. Covered extensively months ago.
      Your position is simply wrong. The controlling SCOTUS precedent is found at 169US649, 1898, long settled SCOTUS law. Read it as opposed to slinging incorrect nonsense.

      Liked by 2 people

      • KnowSERENoFear says:

        REALLY? “Incorrect nonsense?” You, are the one pushing incorrect nonsense. The law does not apply. The Constitution applies. Your “Constitutional law” class taught grounded you in the incorporation doctrine and legal positivism…it did NOT delve into the Federalist papers, the history of the Constitution, nor context associated the Constitution in 1789. Kamala is a citizen…but NOT a natural born citizen.

        Like

        • Debra says:

          So frustrating that someone claims the authority of the ‘law’ on their side, to the detriment of our founding, our heritage, our country, just because they ‘need’ to go along to get along with the ‘Barristers Accreditation Registry’.

          Liked by 1 person

          • KnowSERENoFear says:

            Yes…and the absolute arrogance. There was a Justice in the 1930’s I believe, who said “the Constitution says what I say it says.” Since then…and before then…lawyers have endeavored to ruin this country…and done a damn good job of it. Ristvan can simply not understand that this is not a law question…it’s a Constitution question. I cited a true Constitutional scholar above…but instead of referring to it, Ristvan tells me to read the law. SMH

            Liked by 1 person

        • graphiclucidity says:

          That may be the case, but until the Supreme court makes a ruling on this issue, then Harris, and others in a similar boat – Obama, Rubio, Cruz, are still running for office with nobody opposing them in the courts. In Obama’s case the courts wouldn’t even consider arguments.

          The only way I see to resolve the issue is for President Trump and the RNC (they have standing) to sue Harris and the DNC in federal court and get this question settled once and for all.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Correct, and sadly in the twisted lawfare nation that we have allowed “them” to create there is little chance of a sane common sense ruling.

            Lawfare courts. As someone so aptly stated in the last election cycle “the system is rigged folks.” That means the entire system, not just “part of it”. As you pointed out, the case of barry whoever he is was not even allowed to be considered in “courts of law”.

            Anyone with any common sense should know that people born here to parents on temporary visas and with NO loyalty/allegiance to this nation should never be considered eligible to hold the highest office of the land.

            Declaring these people to be “eligible” for the office of POTUS based on some stare decisis precedent that is not based on eligibility for the office of POTUS is at best ludicrous.

            Like

    • avi says:

      Obama also had zero m but no republican had the balls to call him out,
      no Rep called Pocahontas out until Trump.hopefully he will call kamala Legree out.

      Like

  9. sundance says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • TarsTarkas says:

      Stroke of the pen. Kinda cool.

      Where have we heard that before?

      Liked by 2 people

    • amwick says:

      I totally believe in gun safety.

      I never put a finger on the trigger unitl I am ready to shoot.
      I never aim at anything that I do not intend to shoot.
      I know where I am shooting, and what is behind it.
      Last, but most important, I treat every gun as if it were loaded all the time.

      I do not need Kamala! She will never be president. Grrrrrrrr

      Liked by 8 people

    • gawntrail says:

      …..reminds me…. need more ammo and a few more mags.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Orygun says:

      Gee, if we only had a constitution that guarantees our right to keep and bear arms.

      Liked by 1 person

      • littleanniefannie says:

        Remember, they want a leaving Constitution. Anything they don’t agree with should leave! I can only hope she gets a pweddy widdle pen to erase the United States Constitution that she doesn’t like. Guess the new standard for the Demoparty is More than Obama beach or Less than Obama black.

        Like

    • graphiclucidity says:

      I wonder exactly what kind of “gun safety” she believes she can order about via executive action?

      Limit bullet/shell/gunpowder sales or register them?

      Force the manufacturers to weld a metal plug into the end of each barrel, and call the gun “safe”?

      The mind boggles at the endless well of creativity the left can conjure up in order to deprive their enemies of constitutional rights.

      The only choice these people believe in is their choices to deprive others of property, liberty or life.

      Liked by 2 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      Like fwee heals care for illegals, I want to make shore the non-NRA kwiminals can keep their widdle guns.

      Like

  10. Somebody's Gramma says:

    Harris is strongly disliked by most Californians, so there’s that…
    Srsly, the Dems gotta reach deep. There’s got to be some democrat somewhere who’s worth listening to or they lose the party altogether. Not that I care.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. John Clark says:

    A “coat of many colors.” (Gen 37 – chosen?)
    “Update: she bought the jacket”

    Like

  12. Guyski says:

    She (like Buttigieg) the more you hear/see the less you like. Would not be surprised id she has a problem with women.

    Liked by 4 people

    • gawntrail says:

      She is a snarky, unlikable bitch who rose to her position by operating on her back. A complete slap in the face to women of any political stripe that earned their way. That would be a problem with 99% of women I know.

      Liked by 8 people

  13. parleyvous says:

    Need smollett retrial to smash her thru discovery process.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. calbear84 says:

    The Dems have become so radical that electing one of them would likely bring about a crisis similar to the one that followed Lincoln’s election in 1860. Hopefully we won’t have to go through another Civil War, but at least we’re on the side that would win.

    Liked by 5 people

    • vladdy says:

      I’m getting to feel the same way. Every day, the ugliness, the crude hatred, the insulting of everything American, the bashing (growing more and more physical) of good people, the threats from inside the country and from those invading (and those helping them invade.) Its as if they are saying “Well, you’ve got your president, but we won’t let you have one carefree day while he’s around.” Well, HRC DID say that, didn’t she?

      And did we all hear about WaPo’s op-ed by the Red Hen owner (restaurant that chased out Sarah Sanders) about how, since we refuse to correct our morals and are such bad people, that we have to get used to whatever kind of mistreatment they dish out…or stay home.

      Soon they’ll be asking us to sew stars and triangles on our clothes. Huge shout-out to O for bringing the “kill the infidel–he’s unclean” thing he grew up on to America and making it part of our lives. The left has now turned completely to – your fault if we beat you up, you hater! (and whining “why does the right-wing spread hatred all the time? and where’s my teddy-bear?”)

      Have you noticed how it’s gone from “Don’t wear that hat” and “don’t have a Trump sign in your yard” to “If I spit on you, its your fault” and now “Ima throw a “milkshake on you, made with fast-drying cement and flesh-burning chemicals while my ten buddies and I beat your head in?”

      They have totally absorbed the “make them dhimmis” routine…(which is, of course, why they hate PDT, who won’t act like one, as he’s supposed to) How much longer can this escalate?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Debra says:

        Just ask, ‘Why you want to be so segregationist?’ to those trying to divide our sensibilities . . .

        Like

      • yucki says:

        Dhimmis, indeed.
        There’s no lagtime anymore for the – First they came for the Jews… – thing.

        They’ve COME for the Jews – in the Congress of the U.S.A.!
        But the Jew-ish ‘Rats there jumped ship.

        They’ve COME for the Christians – Covington, disqualifying pro-life Catholics for judicial positions, teaching the shahada in public schools, etc.

        We will MEET them.
        And we will WIN, WIN, WIN!
        ……..
        July 8-9 Christians United for Israel [CUFI] Summit in Washington, D.C.

        Like

  15. The Gipper Lives says:

    The last I heard, there was still a grand jury empaneled on Bernie’s wife, aka, “Insurance Policy”.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. desperatelyseekingmelania says:

    Dunno why any of y’all are scared of that bumbling old fool Biden. You’ve seen what happens when he runs for president, multiple times before.

    If you want to be scared of something, be scared of how many new Democrat voters they are bringing over the border every day.

    Like

  17. Truth seeker says:

    Don’t take this woman lying down (pun intended). She is one of the dems that scares me the most. This woman is a female Obama with more anger and hatred (if that’s possible). She is very dangerous!

    Liked by 10 people

  18. saywhat64 says:

    In 2008 the Dems put up a possible ineligible candidate named barak barry sotoroe obama. The Republican candidate, John McShame had legal standing to challenge obama’s eligibility and force SCOTUS to define Natural Born Citizenship in relation to POTUS eligibility. McShame made a deal with the devil and gave obama a pass.

    This time around the Republican candidate, Donald Trump will have standing to challenge Harris’s eligibility to be POTUS because or her potential lack of Natural Born Citizenship.

    Will he?

    Liked by 2 people

    • thinkwell says:

      Very astute observation! All of the usual denizens of the District of Corruption, even the conservative ones, either did not want to rock the boat or did not have the courage to challenge aka obama’s obvious ineligibility, regardless of whether they had the standing to demand an answer from the SCOTUS. In the case of Kamala Harris (the new female aka obama) only our wonderful President Trump has the courage, the independence and the standing to do so. I hope he is aware of how critical this is to the preservation of our republic.

      Knocking out Kamala Harris on eligibility grounds would have the major righteous side benefit of putting aka obama’s entire putative presidency in doubt and go a long way toward putting our country back on its Constitutional tracks.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Debra says:

      I want him to challenge her eligibility, but I just do not think it will play well in Peoria.

      That is why, above, I said that we the people need to be the voice in this, and inform voters in the primary’s of the issue, along with the rest of the lack of all it takes to be a GOOD president.

      The only way it can work for PDJT to capitalize on this, is to release the REAL birth certificate of the person elected 44th president such that the ‘Obama did it’ rallying cry is completely negated.

      (Truly, this my preferred course of action, but if not done in the manner I described in the above paragraph, my preference is that he not be the one challenging her eligibility.)

      Liked by 2 people

      • graphiclucidity says:

        No doubt, if Harris is the eventual nominee and the president sues over her eligibility then Trump will be called a racist and a sexist for doing it…

        Wait.
        Nothing new there.
        😉

        The RNC might be able to sue on the president’s behalf.
        They’re used to the pressure as well.

        Liked by 1 person

  19. Creepy Joe is the “Great White Hope” of the centrist Democrat Establishment, Crazy Bernie Sanders is the idol of Socialist Millenials, and Fauxcohontas attracts the remaining East Coast loons.

    Kamala Harris, the “New Female Obama” will eventually have the backing of the Dem CA party machine, if she manages to “Do No Harm” thru the pre-nomination process. They will seek to use her race and gender to lasso “Identity Politics”, “White Guilt”, “Women’s” and other blocs.

    How long before we see her cozying up to the Obamas?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Revenant says:

    Wasn’t it thought that Obama was backing Harris? I’m not sure that the Clinton / Obama factions are aligned here.

    Liked by 2 people

    • The Boss says:

      I think you’re onto something. The Clintons and obamas tolerated each other at best. I’m very suspicious of Marc Elias as an advisor to Harris.

      Liked by 2 people

  21. getfitnow says:

    FTA – The aligned media will never allow Kamala Harris to be vetted and will defend her interests at all costs.

    Kamala or whomever will be running against Donald J. Trump not a politician. BTW, he is also POTUS this go-round – with a track record. The counter punches will be laser focused, no matter who they put up, imo.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. DesertRain says:

    My hunch is that Kamala Harris is choice to continue The Obama Legacy…
    As such, Harris would have support from Silicon Valley – particularly Google/Alphabet, Amazon and importantly from deep pocket titans in the JV startup industry.

    Am wondering if Kamala is marketable as a substitute or stand in for Michelle Obama.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Bert Darrell says:

    If Kamala, who is not a natural born citizen (none of her parents were US citizens when she was born), is allowed to run for POTUS, then all of PDJT’s children will automatically qualify when they meet the age requirement.

    BTW, Obama was (he said) the son of a Kenyan father traveling on a British passport and a minor American mother. So, the Trump children should already qualify after attaining the required age.

    Like

    • ristvan says:

      See my comment above. You are simply wrong as a matter of long settled SCOTUS precedent. Her parents were here legally and fully subject to US jurisdiction. Therefore, by controlling 1898 SCOTUS precedent US v Wong Kim Ark, she is a US citizen.
      As for ‘natural born’, the founders, 8USC§1101, and all legal precedent after Ark, ‘natural borne simply means citizen at birth.

      For a longish commentary with many footnotes, see Katyal and Clement 3/11/15 in the Harvard Law Review Forum. You will learn a lot.

      Liked by 8 people

      • riverelf says:

        Thanks Ristvan. If this question goes to SCOTUS they will just uphold precedent. Right or wrong, Constitutionally speaking—I think the framers would have a strong opinion—the angry Kamel can run (and lose to the ESG like any other candidate will).

        Liked by 1 person

      • Bert Darrell says:

        Sad to know that, ristvan. I’m afraid it won’t be long until an illegal alien is “determined’ to be “under the jurisdiction”.Just leave it to the Roberts court.

        Like

      • GB Bari says:

        Took up your suggestion, ristvan.
        But then I found this rebuttal that seems pretty solid.

        https://jimsjustsayin.blogspot.com/2015/03/ina-post-on-harvard-law-review-forum.html

        Liked by 1 person

        • ristvan says:

          It isn’t. Can you spot the reasons why?

          I wrote an ebook about this generic internet problem, published late 2014. The Arts of Truth, available deliberately cheap on iBooks and Amazon Kindle. Hundreds of examples in categories as disparate as energy, education, healthcare, taxation, and climate.
          You might enjoy reading it.

          Liked by 3 people

          • GB Bari says:

            “Can you spot the reasons why?”

            Obviously not, else I would not have posted what I did.
            Ark 1898 looks like the court simply clarified who (other than natural born citizens) may be a “citizen” at birth, but not redefining “natural born citizen” as it pertains to Article II, Section 1 eligibility for President. I understand I am drawing a distinction that is not apparently observed by the courts.

            I subscribe to the contention that no court, not even SCOTUS, can redefine any Amendment. That requires an Article V Amendment process. So despite “precedent” based on Ark, I don’t believe Ark affects Article V eligibility or that children born here or anywhere of parents who themselves were not natural born citizens can be President. Obviously I do not at all support the “anchor baby” concept.

            I guess I am a strict constructionist re. interpreting the US Constitution and its 27 ratified amendments.

            We may disagree but I still believe you offer some of the best-reasoned comments (after Sundance of course) in the Treehouse. Cheers.

            Like

      • Debra says:

        Oh my God!

        A law cannot naturally birth a person. A law can make a person a citizen at birth.

        Logic, anyone?

        The Constitution provides that there SHALL BE natural born citizens AND there will be citizens made by laws passed by Congress.

        The Constitution also provides us with the FACT wrt citizenship that one is either a natural born citizen OR a citizen made by law.

        Congress DID make laws of uniform naturalization in both 1790 and 1795, granting citizenship to people born in this country to parents who were not both citizens. The first law, worded clumsily, stated that those citizens were to be ‘as’ or ‘like’ the natural born.

        Back then this caused consternation, because of that wording, and thus, the second law stated with more clarity, that those born under the stated circumstances were to be considered citizens at birth.

        ALL natural born citizens ARE citizens at birth. Not all citizens at birth are natural born citizens.

        Neither category of citizens at birth are required to go through the naturalization process.

        A natural born citizen is a citizen at birth (at the time they were born) because he/she was born to a citizen mother AND a citizen father. What other ‘citizenship’ could such a person be born to be?

        A person born in this country to a citizen mother and a foreign father is a citizen at birth due to the Naturalization Laws put forth by our early Congress! If one is a citizen DUE TO A LAW, then they are NOT a natural born citizen, because the two (natural born citizen/ citizen) are mutually exclusive of each other.

        This has become such an issue because the last White House occupant was SUCH a liar. Do remember: the TRUTH will set you free.

        Liked by 3 people

      • thinkwell says:

        Actually ristvan, it is you who is woefully mistaken. At the time Kamala Harris was born her parents were in the USA under temporary student visas. They were alien citizens subject to the political jurisdiction of their native lands (where they would vote, be subject to national service, etc.). Citizenship is a matter of political jurisdiction (criminal jurisdiction is irrelevant to citizenship) and neither of her parents were subject to US political jurisdiction.

        The ruling of US v Wong Kim Ark only regarded citizenship (not natural born Citizenship) and only applied to the children of legal permanent residents prevented by law from becoming US citizens.

        Nice try, though. Perchance were you a strong supporter of ineligible, Canadian born (to an alien father) Ted Cruz? I think the fact that he knowingly trashed the Constitution for his own political aspirations and ego is why Texas voters nearly kicked him out of the senate in favor of that total loser, Beta O’Rourke.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Debra says:

          My gut feeling is that any who advocate for a non-natural born citizen as eligible, will turn around and shrug their shoulders when/if it occurs and as our ‘bettors’ tell us that the ‘U.S. electorate voted to do away with our Constitution, so get over it’ . . .

          Like

      • cheryl says:

        According to other interpretations, the only ones allowed to run for POTUS are natural born citizens and those born to American parents overseas. She is not qualified to run for POTUS. Anchor babies are not US citizens.

        Like

  24. Troublemaker10 says:

    CNN has an article out today about how Bernie is in trouble and losing.

    They are knocking down Biden and Bernie, neutral to Warren, and pushing Kamala forward.

    Kamala was the one crowned by Obama. She is combining the corrupt Hillary support team with Obama’s Marxists . Very dangerous .

    On the other hand…

    Trump should be able to further appeal to Bernie supporters who feel cheated again. Not the socialist ones, but the anti-establishment/anti-government corruption ones.

    In addition, he will be able to appeal to the moderate Biden supporters who will be angry with Kamala.

    Liked by 4 people

    • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

      It’s harder to picture Kamala flipping a red state blue. Obama was able to convince a lot of voters he was a centrist. That’s already out the window for the 2020 Dem. Their only hope if to import enough new Democrat voters.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Bendix says:

      I keep saying this, all he’s gotta do is appoint ONE PERSON to look into the student loan scam.
      The Bernie/Liz Warren “solutions” are a coverup which pass the costs onto the taxpayer and perpetuate the racket.

      Mark Steyn believes this is a con, isn’t he conservative enough for his opinion to count?
      IMO, this is one reason they even run someone like Liz, to keep President Trump from interfering with their lucrative fleecing of a generation.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

        The Big Academia Cult has been fleecing the public for decades.
        The costs of higher education at leftwing universities has been steadily increasing much faster than general inflation ever since the 1970s. If these socialist politicians want free college for todays students then let the professors teach for peanuts. Oh, and quit selling lousy $20 textbooks for $118.95.

        Liked by 3 people

        • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

          Today’s students would be ecstatic if they could get textbooks for $118.95

          Liked by 1 person

          • GB Bari says:

            I submit that most students today don’t care about textbook costs. The parents or grandparents or someone else are shouldering those costs. At least that’s what our college student granddaughter says. 😄🙄🤑

            Liked by 1 person

  25. mr. deacon says:

    My take on articles coming out of “The New Yorker” is that Warren is the most likely and more conservative choice of the 40-50 age leftist liberal. Conservative meaning being discreet, showing reluctance, especially when insincere or affected, to reveal one’s plans or opinions, make a commitment, or take a stand, and playing her cards right; but not actually having conservative values. There is little difference between her and Bernie’s socialist agendas. He IS the quintessential “OLD WHITE TOXIC MALE” and although Warren is not actually a Native American, those inconsequential minutiae may be overlooked as a minor misunderstanding faux paux for the good of the cause. While Warren is hardly what one would call refined, Harris and Booker are just too, well, shall we say, left coast and vulgar for the well healed and discreet liberal. A little too pushy. They are obviously trying too hard to fit in. Besides; Warren hates Trump and has shown her ability to attack him without good reason, so there’s that.

    Like

    • desperatelyseekingmelania says:

      Sanders and Warren supporters are fungible, no doubt about that. They would be just as happy to support either one. Not as sure about how quickly they flip to Kamala or Joe.

      Like

  26. Zippy says:

    There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch (TANSTAAFL)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_ain%27t_no_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Hopefully enough voters have been innoculated after Obama from emotionally jumping on another magic light show bandwagon express for a 1/2 term Senator with nothing but Media hype , remember “ thrills up the leg “ the crease of his paints” etc ( boy do they sound cringe worthy embarrassing now .). I agree she is the favorite of Michelle /Jarrett and will be “mentored” by Obamas if ( heaven forbid ) she wins WH . I also think she is mainly favored because the Dems know they need to keep Black vote in their pocket and hope she can keep President Trump from making legitimate gains there which woulld seriously damage chances to hold House , regardless of how she does in General Election . Bernie /Biden/Warren / Butteig would be vulnerable in that regard IMHO

    Like

    • Zippy says:

      “Hopefully enough voters have been innoculated”

      Listen to the audience applause when all of the “free lunch” Dim candidates said they’d provide “free” health care to illegals, effectively saying they’d provide “free” (taxpayer funded) health care to any third world person who can get here, legally or illegally.

      Face it, as confirmed by the popular vote in the last presidential election and the mid-terms, over 50% of US voters are either clueless, propagandized morons, wards of the state or both. They’ll vote for anyone in the Dim clown show.

      Liked by 1 person

  28. buanadha says:

    I wonder if the establishment powers in the Democrat party are calculating they will lose, and then using this election to curb their angry left wing. In that case, Biden will go away (and I still think he’s the only chance for them to win) and one of the more angry left will win the nomination and then lose.

    It gives them the opportunity to push them to the sideline and potentially shut up the AOC’s of the party.. I don’t know if even a stinging election loss would work. They’ll likely just claim a “victory” of some sort and continue to demand more.

    Like

  29. Lulu says:

    She’s a woman who slept her way to the top.
    She’s a woman who didn’t want children.
    She’s an affluent child of immigrants from India and Jamaica that is pretending to be straight out of Oakland.
    She’s married to a white Jewish man.
    She’s strident which doesn’t play well for women.

    She won’t get an enthusiastic turnout.

    Liked by 7 people

    • lotbusyexec says:

      PLUS she is NOT nice and an arrogant SOB. She Is Cruella DaVil but instead of using dogs to make her “fur coats” she’s using illegal immigrants and the democratic party.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Aeyrie says:

        Interesting picture. I agree 100%, by the way! As a Californian I have seen that piece of work up close and personal.

        Like

    • Perot Conservative says:

      Clinton puffed and didn’t inhale.

      Kamala said she lit up to Tupac at Howard, but the dates don’t match?

      Will she sell in Ohio?

      Like

      • vladdy says:

        Isn’t it odd that there is controversy over the weed, but not over listening to one of those who pushed “thug life” over to the mainstream of our culture? Says a lot…

        Like

  30. The Gipper Lives says:

    per Big League Politics, Kamala Harris went on a mad wiretapping spree in California–no wonder Barry likes her. Her hand-picked judge issued five times more wiretapping warrants than any other judge in the country. Then she refused to account for them as required by law. Given the Democrat habit of wiretapping political opponents, we need to look closely at her illegal cover-up.

    If she ever got her hands on the NatSec Apparatus, she would make the Obama/Clinton Coup Attempt look like child’s play.

    Liked by 5 people

    • gawntrail says:

      THAT is the game for the marxists. The spying leads to very powerful notes and files filled with ‘stuff’. All ready to be used when it is prudent.

      Like

    • BitterC says:

      I have seen a few things that give me hope that a deep dive into her time as AG would turn up some interesting nuggets. If they are there, they will be found because I seriously doubt she was well loved by co-workers/employees

      Like

  31. alliwantissometruth says:

    “Despite the brutally obvious 2016 example of Bernie -vs- Hillary most grassroots democrats still have not recognized the Big Club is scripting their nominee”

    The ability to recognize being duped would take a certain amount of intelligence. Grass root democrats can’t even recognize the obvious, which doesn’t even require intelligence, but rather only common sense

    It’s more than obvious the positions, goals and policies put forth by the democrat candidates are unworkable, destructive and completely insane, yet they can’t recognize those facts

    It’s more than obvious the democrats would bankrupt the country, put us all in danger and ruin our children’s futures, yet they’re unable to recognize those facts

    To be a grassroots democrat requires living outside of reality. It requires being stupid with no critical thinking skills or common sense

    They really need a new name. How about the grassroots zombie lemmings of the Globalist Puppet Party?

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Bendix says:

    It doesn’t make sense that Liz Warren, who has been speaking to crowds as large as a dozen, should suddenly become so popular.

    As for Harris, she has a good many negatives, and if she gets too far in the proceedings, those negatives, such as her lack of eligibility, will suddenly matter.
    We won’t see the real source the dirt on her coming from, either.

    IMO, Andrew Cuomo was in the race, and still is in the race. When everyone else drops out, and whoever is left suddenly loses popularity, don’t be surprised if a hero steps up at the last minute to save his party.

    Liked by 1 person

    • riverelf says:

      Oh great. Cuomo. SAFE Act for the whole country, closely followed by Civil War 2: The Bloodening.
      It’s never a bad time to stock up on ammo and MREs.

      Liked by 2 people

  33. TPW says:

    If Kamela is allowed to run even though she is not qualified then our Constitution and election process is dead. We will know just how uniparty the Republicans are if they do not speak up to have her vetted. She needs to be challenged in court. I will start making noise to my representative.for the good it will do and on social media…..maybe we can make it real uncomfortable for her campaign.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Let her run. A California nutcase would be the perfect face for the Democrats 2020. And at this point she is rather confident as she is seen in the above photos picking out the new technicolor dream drapes for the White House.

      Like

  34. ristvan says:

    I am unconvinced Harris is the chosen one. A lot of unseemly baggage, like self identifying as African American when plainly not, the Willie Brown affair, and a botched job as Cali AG.
    But the other three ‘frontrunners’ are for sure DOA. Fauxcahontas because of 1/1024, Sleepy Joe because of his own record, and Crazy Bernie because a feeble repeat of 2016.

    It is quite possible that as this clown show deteriorates further, someone else emerges late to ‘save the day’ against ‘Orange man bad’, like former gov McCauliffe from Virginia (Clinton wing) or former Chicago mayor, former Il congressman, and former Obama CoS Rahm Emanuel (Obama wing), ‘blessed’ by late Obama endorsement then nominated in the second DNC round when superdelegates get their power back.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Hmmm... says:

      I think Harris is the chosen one. Her baggage on the Dem side is something a concentrated Dem media washout can rehab. She represents the greatest opportunity to recreate the Obama coalition of the current candidates and even potentially unnamed ones IMO. She’s having to stray a long way from center to try and get the black vote which will be difficult to walk back in a general election but I think they still have confidence that their media partners will have the influence to make it work (and they might be right). Biden is the only other candidate that has a shot at getting the black vote (at a reasonably high turnout), suburban whites (especially women), and a decent amount of the loonie left.

      I just think that you have to discount baggage on their side a bit as their base is the most highly susceptible to media influence and they will go all out to redeem and sanctify their chosen one. I have never been able to figure out what motivates the black vote though so I have a very hard time figuring out that angle. I would assume that they have the ability to get them on board since they completely control all areas of influence in the black community but I don’t know enough about it.

      Like

    • Arrest Soros says:

      Hi Rud
      I think it has always been obvious that the Dems would choose a woman because of PDJT’s “woman problem”.
      PDJT doesn’t have a black or Hispanic problem, he has a woman problem and the media and Dems will play on that until the cows come home.
      All they have to do is set up PDJT to viciously attack his female opponent and another 1%-2% of women will abandon him.

      Like

  35. StanH says:

    This is a Kamikaze mission for the DNC/Uni-party/MSM. They must attach themselves to anybody but Trump. Whomever that is chosen by the gimmycrat voter the MSM will ballyhoo this individual as the second coming.

    The NWO almost finished us off. It is imperative they beat the evil Americans and our Great President Trump, or we will finish them off. Prepare yourself for phony polls, fake news, all manner of disinformation, censorship. They will lie, cheat and steal, nothing is off the table. Stay firm, stay bold and we’ll beat the hell out of them. Fall in their traps of a “horse-race” and it will be a long year and a half.

    KAG! …by sticking with our Great President Trump!

    Liked by 4 people

  36. Perot Conservative says:

    Which means Kamala, at minimum, has strong backing from Pelosi, Feinstein, and Willie Brown – all from The City.

    Add Newsom, Boxer, the Getty’s … and likely several Billionaires from NorCal.

    Silicon Valley. And Valerie Jarrett (Barack Obama, Michelle).

    Eighteen months of pink hats and Victim Politics. Yuck.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. yy4u says:

    Kamala Harris eerily parallels another unqualified candidate — Barack Obama — first term Senator, African-American (not) but self identified as black. She bothers me for that reason. What with voter fraud, a totally corrupt media, FBI, DOJ, CIA — Europe, Russia AND China wanted to get back to “status quo” with the USA being the world’s patsy and piggy bank. In a fair world, Trump would win 50/50 states (DC is a third world country of its own with the super rich and the super poor). But it’s not a fair world and this time the usual suspects aren’t going to take Donald Trump lightly. They didn’t know how many votes they needed to steal in 2016. They won’t make the same mistake again.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Larry says:

    This is hilarious! The Democrats have to rig everything they touch. Of course, they have the poor “underdog” women pressed under the glass ceiling by the crazy old white men! That’s what they do! That’s all that they know how to do. They are locked into that mafia system. The outcomes are always determined before the voting begins.

    So you can see the trajectory of where they are headed as their North Korean made rocket goes shooting into the nowhere. The Democrats are going as far to the left as possible. That means the candidate, to fit the party plan, must be a woman. And must be a woman with brown skin. And must have questionable citizenship. The Democrats could do no better than Kamala Harris. She has California locked up.

    But why are they going so far left? Who designated Kamala? Likely the Clintons. They still run the DNC until further notice. They own all the henchmen. Who’s above them in the DNC? I wouldn’t be surprised if Hillary is manipulating the candidates to go full retard to make Hillary seem like a JFK Democrat in comparison. It’s a great move. Kamala is weak and easy to remove. The Clintons don’t give up and they are racists. That’s why they are still not in jail. They don’t mess around in their lust for power. And now it’s even more urgent than ever.

    I think that their only move to have any hope of saving themselves from a fate worse than death is maybe for HRC to somehow become President by any means necessary.

    We’ll see what happens, as the world turns.

    Like

  39. Zorro says:

    Another advantage that Horizontal has over the field is her willingness and propensity to participate in false narratives and hoaxes. False narratives and hoaxes are a staple of the Demosocialists.

    Horizontal has been mentioned in relation to the Smollett hoax. Don’t forget that she had a role and participated in the Blowsy Two Door Ford hoax by bringing forward a “Jane Doe” tape accuser against Kavanaugh.

    Like

  40. Stevej says:

    Che Guevara is at 14%.

    Like

  41. Vito Romano says:

    The polls and media hype is national. The electoral college wins the election.

    President Trump isn’t going to lose any solid red states.
    Will he lose TX and FL …NO.
    Is there any DEM that can win NC, WI, MI, OH, and PA. ?
    Biden may be a threat to a couple of the states, but not all of them. Harris ?
    There is no 270 electoral path for the DEMS.

    House and Senate
    President Trump is going to win 2020.
    The biggest threat is how many congressional seats a DEM candidate can carry.
    We need to retake the house and keep the senate.

    Which DEM can carry the most congressional seats ?
    This is the threat we should analysis and prepare for.

    Like

  42. Perot Conservative says:

    Dick Morris predicted the Dems would go Far Left, and made a parallel to a previous race.

    I believe it was Bush Sr. vs Democratic Governor Michael Dukakis.

    I believe the Wildcards could include corruption (incl. Twitter & Google); the MSM; and they will bait POTUS 24 / 7 with inflamatory racial questions. i.e. the Harris-Biden busing setup.

    Hasn’t she already flip flopped on several major issues?

    Liked by 1 person

    • vladdy says:

      Most far-left dim candidate in my memory was McGovern in ’72. Seems Dukakis (I was left at the time and went to a rally, heh) was seen as a “bloodless technocrat” — at least that’s what they blamed their loss on his year (’88?)

      Liked by 1 person

  43. magearcanus says:

    Spank Me/How 2020, this will write itself 😁

    Liked by 1 person

  44. Magabear says:

    Alfred E. Newman (aka Mayor Petey) must be butt hurt over these developments………maybe I should rephrase that. 😉

    Like

  45. rightmover says:

    The candidate who is more personally likable almost always wins the Presidential Election. Now, I never thought of BHO for one damn second as being “likable,” but he was opposed by two distinctly UNlikable GOP opponents. And George W. Bush, whatever his other failings, came off as far more likable than either Gore or Kerry.

    Kamala Harris and Hiawatha are both off-putting, repugnant scolds. Any male voter with an actual set would crawl over broken glass to vote against either of these two harridans.

    Like

  46. mg says:

    Bonds Barr, the democrat controlled media and the deep state republicans will insure a democrat wins in 2020

    Like

  47. mg says:

    Bondo Barr

    Like

  48. Julian says:

    So when is “Bondo” Barr and his FBI going to properly investigate the Jussie Smollett case and Kamala’s involvement in staging the hoax?

    And indict and charge all conspirators thus involved?

    What is the FBI doing?

    Like

  49. ScoutBird says:

    Heels Up effectively neutralized Biden and pushing him to commit self immolation due to his transparent stupidity. Sleepy Groppy Joe is deadman walking. Next target of the evil twins Heels Up & Fauxcahontas will be an equally stupid Crazy Bernie. Then the claws will come out, as Heels & Faux attack each other. Steyer entering now should be too late for the July debate. He will then bury the cat fight survivor as Fall turns.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s