Rudy Giuliani Responds to Nadler Interview – Margaret Brennan Bias Slip…

President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani appears on FtN to rebut the framework put forth by Jerry Nadler.  Toward the end of the combative and argumentative interview a frustrated Margaret Brennan accidentally let’s her bias surface visibly; she didn’t realize she was on camera (screen shot below).

[Transcript] MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re going to turn now to President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani who is here with me. Would you like to respond to the congressman who says he has the right and the committee has the right for all of this information. Do you agree that the public has the right?

RUDY GIULIANI: I- I would like him to get all the information.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Including the things that are protected–

GIULIANI: Everything.

MARGARET BRENNAN: –grand jury material.

GIULIANI: But I can’t control that, and I can’t change the law. And the attorney general has a difficult job, and I didn’t appreciate his suggestion the attorney general would be biased. I know Bill Barr for many many years. I think people in this town know him. He’s a man of the highest integrity. Also everything he’s doing is also being run by Rod Rosenstein. That- that report was put out by Barr and Rosenstein.

MARGARET BRENNAN: The- the four page summary?

GIULIANI: Rosenstein started the investigation, supervised the investigation allowed the special counsel to do things that I thought were kind of off base. He certainly gave them full scope to do their entire investigation. There’d be no reason why Rod Rosenstein would sign his name to something that says they found no evidence of collusion. No evidence of obstruction. They couldn’t reach a conclusion on obstruction.


GIULIANI: So then Rosenstein and Barr did no obstruction. I- I guarantee you except for little quibbles, I’m not worried about the report at all. There’s no way those two good lawyers would have written that kind of letter if there’s any issue.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Is the president waiving all executive privilege? I mean he said publicly he thinks this report should be made public?

GIULIANI: The- the president’s cooperation with this investigation it was unprecedented. Bill Clinton fought every single subpoena. And- and it was a knock down drag out battle.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But then he did ultimately sit down and do it.

GIULIANI: That’s why he had to–

MARGARET BRENNAN: The president never did, though.

GIULIANI: That’s why the president didn’t have to because they couldn’t win in court. They had every piece of information. They couldn’t suggest a question they didn’t have the answer to because we supplied him with the answers to everything and the president did answer questions in writing.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So I want to ask you about that, but to be clear here, is the president waiving all executive privilege?

GIULIANI: As far as I know, he has. But he can’t waive all executive privilege. There are also other people that have executive privilege that are involved–

MARGARET BRENNAN: So there will be information withheld from this report?

GIULIANI: I don’t know, Margaret. I don’t know. The attorney general has said he’s going to put out the maximum amount of information possible. The only thing that will stop him will be legal barriers. I hope there are a few because I don’t like what Jerry Nadler just did. Innuendo and there must be more- look. Jerry Nadler prejudged this case a year ago. He was- he was talking about impeachment. He was overheard on Amtrak talking about impeachment well before the report came out. So when he talks about the attorney general being biased, my goodness, and on his committee he’s got some of the most rabid people that hate Trump. This is- we’re not going before a court here. We’re going before a political body–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well do you- do you fear that–

GIULIANI: –that is highly partisan and has made up its mind.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve- you and the president have welcomed the four page summary. Do you think that the 400 page report is going to be more damaging?

GIULIANI: No. I don’t think so.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So you- when you say you–

GIULIANI: I’ll give you another reason I don’t think that–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –you support the disclosure though.

GIULIANI: –when- when the leakers–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Will the president tell the attorney general to make all this public?

GIULIANI: President has left it to the attorney general. President can’t make the decisions about–

MARGARET BRENNAN: But you just said he’s not decided on executive privilege yet.

GIULIANI: The president has told the attorney general, has told everybody, the world, “I am comfortable with everything being released.” Now the president can’t change the law. Now the attorney general has to apply that. He is- he wants to do maximum transparency. I’m sure we’ll get just about all of it. I hope we get all of it.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you think then that the interview that the president didn’t sit for but provided written answers to will you make those answers public if you support full transparency?

GIULIANI: I’m not going to make anything public. The attorney general will make it public if he believes it should be made public.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well can’t the president decide to make his own answers public?

GIULIANI: Once it’s all over, maybe. Let’s see what the attorney general does first. Why don’t we wait until the attorney general files the report and then if we want to complain about it we can complain about it. I have another- I have another–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you confident there will be no evidence of obstruction of justice–

GIULIANI: I’m going to show you why–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –in these 400 pages?

GIULIANI: I’m going to show you why I’m confident there’ll be no evidence of anything really bad because the leakers- and Nadler was wrong about that too- the Mueller- Mueller group has been leaking all along. How did CNN end up at Roger Stone’s raid?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well they have their own explanation as to good reporting there.

GIULIANI: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But for 22 months, you have to acknowledge the special counsel’s office–

GIULIANI: Hell no.

MARGARET BRENNAN: –did not leak.

GIULIANI: Hell no. I got plenty of, “they’re saying this, they’re saying that.” They knew all about our battle over questions–


GIULIANI: –they knew about the positions we took.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But- but you’re- you’re impugning their credibility and their contact. But you are actually accepting and supporting their conclusions–

GIULIANI: Far more credible. Yes, because–

MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s a bit contradictory.

GIULIANI: No, it’s not at all Margaret. He was cleared–

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’re accusing them of bias but you agree with their conclusions.

GIULIANI: That’s because there is no evidence. If- if they could have found anything, if Andrew Weissman who was crying at Hillary Clinton’s losing party, couldn’t find anything. If Ms Rhee who was counsel to the Clinton Foundation couldn’t find anything, believe me, there was nothing there. And they tried to make things up. They put so much pressure on people, keeping them in solid confinement.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Republicans shouldn’t be pushing back on full disclosure of the report.

GIULIANI: No Republican’s pushing back on full disclosure of the report. I haven’t heard any Republican that isn’t in favor of full disclosure.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well in terms of- Jerry Nadler’s making an argument–

GIULIANI: Jerry Nadler is making a–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –on different grounds–

GIULIANI: –is making a phony–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –of constitutional oversight.

GIULIANI: He’s making a phony argument. Jerry Nadler can’t change the law. The law is the law. The attorney has to apply the law. Jerry Nadler is a biased, completely predetermined– does- does he want us to believe that he’s going to give us a fair hearing?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Should- do you think–

GIULIANI: He announce- He announced–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –do you think- he just said that he wants–

GIULIANI: –some of his members have announced a year ago that he should be impeached.

MARGARET BRENNAN: He just said he wants to have perhaps some of the investigators come before his committee and answer questions. Do you support that?

GIULIANI: Why for a political show?



MARGARET BRENNAN: Why not? They have oversight.

GIULIANI: We-we- Mueller–

MARGARET BRENNAN: If some people in the Justice Department did think the president committed obstruction of justice, shouldn’t they be heard out? And if there’s nothing to it–


MARGARET BRENNAN: –why not allow it?

GIULIANI: Can we listen to the report first? The four leakers or the leakers who leaked to The New York Times that there are problems in the report. Did you notice a leak no specific? I can’t imagine that the reporter didn’t ask. Give- give me an example–


GIULIANI: Give me an example of something in the report that suggests that the President obstructed justice.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Some have argued that–

GIULIANI: No examples–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –it’s almost forcing Barr’s hand though to follow through and not keep that public–


MARGARET BRENNAN: –but private.

GIULIANI: These people who hate him- that we’re willing to commit close to a criminal act to say there are bad things in the report, if they have some dynamite they’re not going to give it to the guy?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Is the president–

GIULIANI: I can’t–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Is the president considering a pardon for Michael Flynn?

GIULIANI: President is not considering pardons at this time.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And he wouldn’t for Michael Flynn?

GIULIANI: You mean ever ever ever in the whole history of his presidency?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Have you not discussed it?

GIULIANI: How do I know?

MARGARET BRENNAN: You haven’t discussed it?

GIULIANI: Yes we discussed it at the very beginning and decided the whole question of pardons would be put off.

MARGARET BRENNAN: On Michael Cohen, you just heard Chairman Nadler there talk about the offer that was made by Cohen’s attorneys to come in and provide some of this information.

GIULIANI: Yeah that’s pretty hilarious.

MARGARET BRENNAN: They have text messages. Apparently recordings according to the attorney. What is on this?

GIULIANI: If- if Jerry Nadler wants to convince me he’s interested in the truth then he should be recommending a prosecution of Cohen for his last appearance before the Congress when he lied about–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well he is going to jail.

GIULIANI: No no no–

MARGARET BRENNAN: He’s going to prison for that–

GIULIANI: Wait- wait–

MARGARET BRENNAN: But are you confident though that–

GIULIANI: Just be–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –Cohen doesn’t have damaging information–

GIULIANI: Margaret. Margaret–

MARGARET BRENNAN: on these millions of- of bytes he claims he has?

GIULIANI: –he’s going to jail but after he got convicted of that and after he promised to cooperate and tell the truth he went before Congress and he made a fool out of the committee. He was asked, “did you have ever- did you ever ask for a job? He said, “No I never asked for a job.” Yes he asked for a job. He asked me to get him a job. He asked 100 other people to get him a job and there is a tape, contemporaneous tape, with Chris Cuomo in which he says I want to be chief of staff and Cumo says, “good luck Mike. I hope you get it.” Direct absolute perjury trying to make himself look like he’s not a disgruntled office seeker–

MARGARET BRENNAN: So you don’t think he has–

GIULIANI: –material information.

MARGARET BRENNAN: –anything damaging to the president in all these recordings he claims to have.

GIULIANI: No I have, I have no I have no confidence that these people care about the truth, Chairman Cummings told him–

MARGARET BRENNAN: But as to what Cohen has–

GIULIANI: Please. Chairman Cummings told Cohen when he started this testimony very dramatically, “If you lie-” I don’t know if you said I’ll hang you to a cross or I’ll throw the book at you or- I haven’t seen him throw anything at him. He lied about a job he lied about a pardon he lied about foreign representation he lied about three others things–

MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m still not getting an answer on that question of whether you think there’s damaging information that Cohen has. We have to leave the interview here.

GIULIANI: Cohen has already spilled his guts so you don’t think he has anything.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So you don’t think he has anything?



GIULIANI: –nothing at all incriminating on– Here’s the disappointing thing for Jerry Nadler–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Mayor, we have to leave it at that–

GIULIANI: And all the- all the Democrats, the president did nothing wrong.


GIULIANI: They’re chasing him, harassing him. This is a total political endeavor now. If we put out that whole report or almost all of it and it clears the president, they should not be continuing this investigation. It’s a political witch hunt.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Alright. Mr. Mayor thank you very much.

GIULIANI: Thank you.

Margaret Brennan giving Giuliani the ‘just shut the hell up’ posture and eyeroll…

This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

89 Responses to Rudy Giuliani Responds to Nadler Interview – Margaret Brennan Bias Slip…

  1. Piggy says:

    Another episode of “Deface the Nation”…

    More gaslighting for the grand jury testimony.

    All Brennan’s can’t be political hacks and people who vote for Gus Hall or am I naive?

    Liked by 19 people

  2. pgroup says:

    Rudy’s directly over the target. The enemy identifies itself by reacting.

    Liked by 22 people

    • BigMamaTEA says:

      I learned years ago, that for myself, I benefit from listening to the verbiage, and seem to get distracted by the visual……I can hear the VILE in this chick’s tone, starting with her introduction! LOL!

      Too bad, so sad……..Some are not save-able……and Rudy is having a blast.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. decisiontime16 says:

    One of these days, Margaret Brennan will have a big surprise coming if she is able to be rational.

    Liked by 20 people

    • Shop says:

      Rep. Nunes is such a stand up guy. Now let’s see if Trump’s new AG does anything with these criminal referrals or just sweeps it all under the rug in a never ending investigation that goes nowhere.

      It was very disappointing when President Trump bactracked on Nunes request & advise to declassify specific documents & communications.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Troublemaker10 says:

      Had to wait for a new AG before referral? Sounds like one referral may be Rosenstein (fisa abuse). Also wondering if one of the leakers they made a criminal referral on is Schiff (Don Jr suspects him to be a leaker of his closed door testimony).

      Liked by 4 people

    • starfcker says:

      Yes, DT16, but I don’t believe she’s going to be able to be rational. Her frustration is from being run rings around by the pro Trump guests on her show. Margaret, bless her heart, is just not that bright. Her inability to control her own show drives her crazy. She’s not quick on her feet at all. All she has is her talking points on the paper in front of her, and her only defense is to go back to them instead of actually engaging. I was waiting for her to ball up her hands and shriek at Giuliani, “Fine.” I’m sure her husband would recognize that

      Liked by 4 people

    • Apollo says:

      Nunes is doing his part. Will Barr do his?

      I am tired of hearing about “referrals”. We didn’t hear about referrals for Gen. Flynn or George Papadopoulos or Manafort or anyone else affiliated with Trump. We heard about arrests, prosecutions, charges, guilty pleas, convictions, sentences. I am tired of referrals.

      Liked by 4 people

  4. WSB says:

    The Muslim Marine Propagandist’s wife was only following the 4 AM memo to gin up the “Cohen has 14 million pieces of damaging information on the President” angle. Again.

    Rinse, repeat.

    Eye roll.

    Liked by 14 people

  5. Southern Son says:

    I am not a violent man, but if I was gonna choke a bitch…

    Liked by 14 people

    • Henry chance says:

      President Trump accomplished total defeat of any modicum of credibility the virtue signaling Fake News Nets cling to. He called out their Fake News, that means Margaret’s underwear is showing. They are angry.

      Collectively the fake News media is fighting to save face.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Southern Son says:

        I never served in the Military, but for everyone else that didn’t,
        Maggies Drawers is a Miss.
        Suppose’n that’s what youre referring to.
        Glad I could clear that up.


    • G. Alistar says:

      “Turn the other cheek, kill them with kindness and a smile.” The good book (Word of God) says in Proverbs 25:21, 22 (KJV) “ If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread
      to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink: For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the LORD shall reward thee.” May God bless. p.s., the Bible also says, “vengeance is mine saith the Lord.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Nobody is seeking vengeance; we are trying to STOP, now and at any time in the future, a criminal Insane Left from continuing to delude the country and destroy our inalienable right to a true government of the people, by the people, for the people. “To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their JUST powers from the consent of the governed.” Vengeance is about getting back at someone who has stopped their evil; they haven’t stopped, they refuse to stop. Think straight.

        Liked by 4 people

    • LafnH20 says:



    • Janice says:

      I’m right by your side!

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Henry chance says:

    Margaret wants so much to be a Sunday gossip column tabloid maven.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. namberak says:

    … just hit me that Rudy’s going to send PDJT one hell of a big bill when this train wreck finally comes to rest. Which seems like it’ll be sometime after my grandkids have grandkids at the rate we’re going.


    • Roger Duroid says:

      Rudy is POed. Best interview and defense of PDJT he has done. He is enjoying this new ability to go on attack.

      Liked by 13 people

      • duchess01 says:

        No, Roger – he is going back to being himself – after all – he took on the mafia in NY – no easy task – have to be one in a million to do that – imho

        Liked by 2 people

    • Kitty Kat says:

      He said on air not long ago that he is working pro bono.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Shadrach says:

        Probably enjoying the hell out of it too.

        Liked by 3 people

      • GB Bari says:

        Yes, He’s made his money and is comfortable.

        Now he’s just having fun.

        The old guys & gals in the Treehouse will understand this:
        After you’re retired and living off of your accumulated wealth and assets for which you busted your hump for 40+ years, you can enjoy “giving back.” And it doesn’t matter whether you’re “giving back” to your community, charity, and/or service to your nation as Rudy is doing by defending the nation’s best President in many many decades.

        Liked by 3 people

  8. Is there no shame among these tv readers? I have long since resisted the urge to defame real journalists by calling them that. They are pundits. All of them. Idiots like Carl Bernstein, who wants you to believe he’s a journalist (if he ever was—I now have to question his Watergate work knowing the way FBI/DoJ/CIA work) But he’s a hack. A hack who works for a newspaper (mouthpiece rag) and a most biased tv channel.
    Ole Margaret went from throwing softballs to throwing hardballs. Would have been better for her if she had been able to find the strike zone. Shoot, she had trouble finding the park. Her show should be Face the Hack!

    Liked by 7 people

    • Milo says:

      Bernstein and Woodward were made journalistic icons because one of them happened to pick up the phone when Bill Felt felt the guilts and called The Post. After that they were just stenographers. Any gopher could have done the same.

      Liked by 12 people

  9. stablesort says:

    The Mueller teams wants to smear President Trump with misleading quotes and testimony that is present in the Mueller report. Full ‘transparency’ is the only way to get those lies and distortions in front of the public. There is a difference between ‘transparency’ and the truth. Mueller and the Democrats want transparency so they can cover up the truth.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. thesavvyinvester says:

    Rudy went off on Howie Kurtz about how all this started in the Ukraine and how Biden and his son are in on this up to their eyeballs and ask the question were they ( the Ukranians ) the ones who concocted the Dossier. Howie didn’t quiet have a Jackie Gleason hamanahamana moment but it was close as he tried to stop Rudy and go on, Rudy would have none of it.

    We are on the Offensive Treepers, their is a merde’ storm coming and all the Clintonian and Obamatons who were in on this up to there eyeballs have to quaking in there boots.I hope Sundance post the clip, Classic Rudy it was….

    Liked by 12 people

    • jahealy says:

      Kurtz. Another FNC talking head I can’t tolerate. He follows Maria on Sunday mornings, and I can’t get the TV off fast enough between the end of her show and the beginning of his. He’s a liberal tool.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Lactantius says:

    I rather wish that Rudi had a bit more of Newt Gingrich in him.

    “Margaret, which part of the law about turning over raw data do you not understand?”

    “Margaret, it is clear that what you want the law to say in order to promote your ideological agenda. How do you propose going about neutering the law?”

    And so forth.

    Margaret Brennan is not interviewing in any reasonable sense of the term. She is being contentiously adversarial without having first proved her ground. She uses her own weak mind coupled with the voices in her head piped in from the control room. Rudi should take off the gloves and expose the cuckoo’s nest for what it is by using his time to tear Margaret Brennan down to size in order to proceed with his narrative.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Amy2 says:

      Margaret, if you were being investigated and nothing was found to charge you, would you want the testimony of everyone you know, and all the information found on you during the investigation given to your enemies? Meh, she would just say, “I’m asking the questions here….”

      Liked by 3 people

  12. AnotherView says:

    MARGARET BRENNAN: “I’m just doing my part to fight Russia for Hillary.”

    Liked by 1 person

  13. evadouglas says:

    I thought it was a good interview. I think the eye roll was because they were coming up against a commercial break and Rudy wanted to finish his sentence.


  14. Ilcon says:

    She sounds exactly like Butt Wallass.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. amwick says:

    Sht like this is why I really dislike the Sunday interviews. Excuse my French.

    Liked by 6 people

  16. Publius2016 says:

    SAD…CBS had some integrity but over the past 3 years, they have NONE! 100% pure propaganda!! keeps interrupting answers to questions because the answers damage the credibility of HACKS!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Tl Howard says:

    Just finished watching this elsewhere and came here I was so depressed by it. This dummy doesn’t even care how stupid she appears. She has a job. She knows there is only one way to proceed to keep the job, ANY job in the media.

    I wish Rudy had simply gotten the giggles and been unable to answer.
    We all know that answering their questions validates those questions in the public eye.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. Has anybody ever seen Margaret Brennan and John Brennan in the same room at the same time? And did she/he go to Moscow in March of 2016. too?

    Just askin’ cos of the betrayals to the public interest and all.

    Liked by 6 people

  19. What Republican or Trump Administration official has asked to hold back ANYTHING in the Mueller Report? No one on our side is trying to cover up or hide anything! There is nothing to hide!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. woohoowee says:

    Brennan’s face always looks like that, it’s stuck that way. Perpetually dour.

    Liked by 5 people

  21. TycheSD says:

    NBC – MSNBC in particular, appears to be the mouthpiece of the Democratic Party. ABC and CNN are hard for me to pinpoint where their loyalties lie, except in getting ratings, and hatred of Trump. But CBS is total Deep State – defense, national security and intelligence establishment. Note who has been the most frequent guest on Face the Nation – John McCain. Former host, Bob Schieffer, loved McCain.

    Regarding today’s show, this was the best job Rudy has done so far representing Trump. He was excellent and got in some very good points. Margaret attacked the whole time.

    As for today’s panel, they all seemed rather “reasonable.” They even had Ben Domenech, who s a conservative, but is married to Meghan McCain. Former Face the Nation host, John Dickerson, officiated at their wedding. I would bet Domenech dislikes Trump intensely. The goal seemed to be to set up the Democrats as being reasonable also by saying the “Democratic leadership” was opposed to talk of impeachment while some of their wild-eyed members were still pushing it. And, of course, they are not even thinking about impeachment UNLESS they find something that would warrant that action. So, that’s the point. They need to get their hands on the unfiltered Mueller report in order to find that “something.” It can’t just be some lie that Michael Cohen might be pushing. It has to come from an “unimpeachable source.” Notice how Margaret continued to claim that the Mueller team had not leaked during this whole time. That is complete garbage. Somebody on that team was leaking, and still is.

    And notice how Amy Walter, the polling expert, laid it out – whether Trump will be closer to the upper point of his range at 45 approval, or down at 35, will determine how he does in 2020. They have to drive his numbers down to win.

    Liked by 1 person

    • freepetta says:

      Wait? You say CNN and ABC are difficult to determine where their loyalties lie?
      Are you kidding me? If you can make that statement then you are NOT a well informed person.
      I stopped reading right there!!


      Liked by 2 people

    • ATheoK says:

      “TycheSD says:
      April 7, 2019 at 3:46 pm

      And notice how Amy Walter, the polling expert, laid it out – whether Trump will be closer to the upper point of his range at 45 approval, or down at 35, will determine how he does in 2020. They have to drive his numbers down to win.”

      A) First the group you fail to mention, the democrats, have major hurdles to drag their numbers up from the gutter.

      B) Trump’s numbers have steadily, in spite of every fabrication, every lie, everly falsehood, every delusion the democrats scream about, continued a steady increase; and this is according to pollsters known to be biased.

      C) Just to reach 45, Trump’s numbers will have to decline. Meanwhile, consider the large Hispanic support for Trump at his recent Calexico visit,or the significant amount of ex-democrats at his recent rally.

      D) It is all right with me for democrats to underestimate Trump’s popularity while overestimating support for democrats and their illegal censoring of conservatives, bald faced lies through purchased news agencies, and abject seditious illegalities committed to obstruct Trump. Such oversights directly harm democrat illegal voter fraud activities.

      Fortunately, greater and greater numbers of Americans see the democrats for what they are; power hungry elitists who despise civilians, the Constitution, Bill of Rights, honesty in government, needs of citizens, equal justice for all, etc. etc.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. BarneyRubble says:

    Trump Giuliani 2020

    Liked by 1 person

  23. TycheSD says:

    How close are John Brennan and Joe Biden?


  24. Lulu says:

    What a trashy hack she is. I absolutely loathe everyone in the media.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. freepetta says:

    Is Margaret Brennan related to x-CIA Chief Jihadi Mohamed Brennan or is she just naturally an imbecile? It’s difficult to determine her degree of idiocy.


    Liked by 1 person

  26. Fools Gold says:

    This show should be titled Face the Depressed with Maggot Cleavageland…


  27. jkcinsalem says:

    We must be patient with PDJT. This will unfold now through Election Day 2020.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Carrie says:

    Margaret really is insufferable. Watching these interviews are just getting progressively more painful.

    Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      She’s horrible! You can tell she’s being fed questions and other directions through her ear piece. She can’t even have a conversation with her guests like Maria Bartiromo does. Brennan is like Chris Wallace, has a narrative to follow and won’t allow guests to depart from it. I wish Giuliani wouldn’t allow her to interrupt, he should just march on with whatever he wants to say, f her and her script.

      Liked by 1 person

  29. Sue Fowler says:

    What does anyone expect from a dem? Honesty? Hardly. Ethics? Never. Morally bankrupt.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Guffman says:

    Just insufferable nonsense from dopey TDS Brennan. Here’s an idea for you Maggie – why don’t you wait to see what Barr does and doesn’t release before you whine incessantly about what *might* happen?

    Typical fake news journalist trying to make something huge out of nothing. No wonder more and more Americans are turning you off every week.

    Liked by 1 person

    • PVCDroid says:

      Wait? You’ve got to be kidding. They are like children right now throwing tantrums and looking like fools. It’s impressing no one except those in their small circles. These people are starting to literally frighten normal Americans and we should see that in a statement at the polls next year. We need some good Republican candidates up against these crazy loons and also need to primary Rinos or never Trumpers whenever possible and prudent.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. askandgettruth says:

    please people do not trust rudy giuliani he is deep into the cover-up of 9/11.i have been researching this for 18 years and this guy along with his police chief crook. do your homework !!!


  32. Ryan Workman says:

    That look a generic leftist host gives a MAGA answer.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s