September 10th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #599

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.


This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Sarah H Sanders Twitter @SHSanders45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,087 Responses to September 10th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #599

  1. boogywstew says:

    “How many Democrats does it take, to change a lightbulb? A thousand if they’re government employees.

    Liked by 6 people

  2. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 13 people

  3. blognificentbee says:

    Can someone kindly refresh my memory on the site that lists the President’s schedule. Interested to see his 9/11 events. I thought I heard he will be in Shanksville tomorrow. Does anyone know if he is attending The Pentagon ceremony? Need to set the DVR. Thanks.


    And on the lighter side: It’s also the #SideofBeef anniversary!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. budmc says:


  5. When the heck is someone going to do something about Maxine Waters? Good grief, that woman is a lunatic! I guess I know the answer to that but it still galls me to no end.


    • Let's Pop Smoke says:

      When you let them “get to you,” they win. Stop paying attention to her and her cohorts. This junk is last minute panic prior to the release of the redacted FISA documents. It will only get worse until those documents are released. Then, they’re all done for! Don’t worry, VSGDJT has this…trust him!


      • Tseg says:

        It will continue up to the mid-terms… and likely until 2020 and beyond. The only question remains when the white jackets with the sleeves that wrap behind their back go on?


    • fred5678 says:

      Let her rant — the few sane Democrats will soon get embarrassed and stay home on elction day.


  6. Bendix says:

    I realized I hadn’t looked in on Rush Limbaugh in awhile. I’m glad I did just now. I found this:
    RUSH: Then we got Barack Hussein O, who decides to go out and start back on the campaign trail because he was so successful getting Hillary Clinton elected. What people forget is that Obama, as a coattail endorser, is instant death to a candidate.
    Some hilarious stuff there.

    Liked by 10 people

  7. Zak Maymin says:

    "Where is the letter?" barked Trump. "What letter?" Gary Cohn shot back. "There definitely was a letter. Right here." "No," said Gary. "It was a mouse.""A mouse?" "Yes." Trump was silent. Than he said: "A mouse in the White House." "A cause to rouse," finished the thought Gary.— Zak Maymin (@ZMaymin) September 10, 2018


    • Blind no longer says:

      RUSH: No, no. Don’t get confused here. What I’m saying, folks, is the New York Times op-ed, that piece by Anonymous — whoever wrote that — and the Bob Woodward book, they’re nothing new at all. In fact, you could make the case… Now, the Woodward book has been in the planning stages for a long time; he’s been working on it a long time. So it’s not… The strategy for the Woodward book is not something that just popped up in the past couple of weeks. But, regardless, the New York Times op-ed…

      Which is there to buck it up — you know, to get in on the action and to get the Woodward book shown in the New York Times, in another publication. It’s to make it look like this anti-Trump stuff is all over the place, the “Trump is dangerous” stuff is all over the place. I would suggest to you this is just the media and the Washington establishment giving up on any idea that the special counsel is gonna come up with anything to get rid of Trump. I don’t think there’s anything arguable about this.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Blind no longer says:

      If this is a quote from Woodward’s book…Here’s what I think about that:

      I listened to Rush tell the story of why Bob Woodward should never ever have credibility again on any book he writes. I did not know this story, but Rush said Woodward claimed to have walked into Casey’s hospital room while he was in a coma. Woodward claimed in his smear job book against Ronald Reagan, that Casey woke up out of a coma, only for a few minutes, long enough to tell him that Reagan was dirty as hell on Iran-contra, and then fell back into a coma.
      This story should be spread across the airwaves and internet everywhere, since I doubt many have either heard this or remember it! LMAO..Woodward is a complete fraud.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Zak Maymin says:

    1/2 Once generals and admirals came to Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis and asked him what to do with Assad. “I don’t know,” said Mattis. “I am asking Donald Trump.” He dialed the White House and said: “Mr. President, you are on speakerphone. “What should we do with Assad?”— Zak Maymin (@ZMaymin) September 10, 2018

    Liked by 1 person

    • Blind no longer says:

      When I saw that whoever wrote this, “Why couldn’t we have somebody more like John McCain?” And then I thought, this person has to be a Millennial, it has to be a young person, because this person writes as though this is the greatest challenge to the modern American presidency ever. And it isn’t. It’s nothing of the sort. Trump is not. I mean, these people may be, but Trump isn’t.

      But this person, you know, my belief that everybody’s historical perspective begins with the day they were born, that nothing before that really matters to most people, that’s just old-fashioned fuddy-duddy stuff back then. What matters is what happened when I was alive and when I am alive.

      And then I just openly went back and considered, you know, I wouldn’t put it past the New York Times to have made this whole damn thing up and to have somebody on their editorial board write this thing. How many anonymous sources have we had from intelligence people for the past two years claiming to have evidence that Trump colluded with Russia?

      Rush Limbaugh

      Liked by 4 people

  9. Zak Maymin says:

    2/2 “Let’s f…ing kill him! Let’s go in. Let’s kill the f…ing lot of them.” The room went silent. Mattis put the phone on mute and proudly said: “He's talking like a fife or six star general.” And then they heard: “Jim, are you there? I am talking to Gary about the mouse.”— Zak Maymin (@ZMaymin) September 10, 2018


    • Carl says:

      Did you write this? If not, where did it come from?


    • Blind no longer says:

      And over the past year and a half, two years when any of us have discussed this they’ve mocked us and they’ve laughed at us and they’ve said that’s absurd, that’s crazy. And yet now they come forth and admit it. What a brilliant trick the Trump people could have pulled here. I went through every possibility.

      Rush Limbaugh

      Liked by 2 people

  10. budmc says:

    Liked by 11 people

  11. ecmarsh says:

    Today, thanks to Sundance and Katica I unfollowed a bunch of people. This evening the confusion is pretty much gone.

    Liked by 8 people

  12. Blue Ridge Mts Va. says:

    Natural News Guy says President Trump has only one path to save America from Deep State goons.

    In the months ahead, America will either fall to deep state tyranny, or patriots like President Trump will be victorious in taking back our constitutional republic from the nefarious grip of the swamp (in collaboration with the left-wing media that’s now run by the CIA).

    Today I’ve published an emergency alert video that warns Trump has just one path to save America from a deep state takeover. The full video, shown below, discusses tech giants’ censorship, the coming false flag attack to be blamed on Alex Jones, and how Trump can save America by initiating the arrest and prosecution of deep state criminals such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sy_N_Tist says:

      As I read here and other blots, I am always amazed at the number of posters who are so aware of all possibilities and certainties, and yet were not hired by President Donald J Trump yet.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Dutchman says:

      Gee, I must have missed when ‘natural news guy’ ran for and won the Presidency. How many electoral votes did HE get?

      Didn’t bother with the link, any lead in which says “The President MUST do this” ain’t gonna get my interest.

      Actually, it reflects the same attitude expressed by the writer of the NYT op-ed.

      “I know what the POTUS should/ must do, I know BETTER than him.”

      Ain’t wasting my click.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. fred5678 says:


    Liked by 4 people

  14. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 8 people

  15. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 7 people

  16. Liked by 2 people

  17. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 5 people

  18. Liked by 3 people

  19. I know the NeverQers will resist any opening of the mind but there’s been a very clear proof coordinated with POTUS today at the request of Anons. It might be worth a look at this proof (where POTUS tweets and Q posts to 8-chan at precisely the same time) to determine whether or not you still believe that POTUS is not supportive of Q’s efforts.

    Keep in mind also that journalists could end this quickly by asking POTUS to disavow Q.


    • iswhatitis says:

      When you “Q devotees” post something with specifics (such as supporting links) THEN maybe I’ll take a look.

      As it is – this is another “empty drop” that expects me to “vet it myself” because you posted a claim, but I have to go find the links and proof.

      I won’t play that way. I call B.S. until/unless you show otherwise. Vague pronouncements mean nothing – it’s been a “Q way” for too long and I, for one, ain’t playing that game with “Q”.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Free Speech says:

        Okay, then I’ll give you the specifics so you don’t have to look it up for yourself. Somebody on the Q board asked Q to provide a proof by posting at the same time the President tweeted, which subsequently happened with only 10 seconds difference on the timestamps. So ‘happy coincidence’? Only like it’s the 50th time a happy coincidence has happened. So, if, like liberals who won’t come to a site like this because they’ve been told CTH is a white supremacist, Nazi site without vetting that claim by reading CTH content, you dismiss qanon because you fancy yourself a ‘normal’ person who doesn’t believe in that kook stuff because someone told you it’s conspiracy nonsense, that’s fine. And that’s your prerogative. But THAT is the precise mindset that got us in this mess. Refusing to think for ourselves, refusing to research or vet information, trust only mainstream sources, vote for the incumbent, vote for the candidate with party and money backing. That’s why we have a government full of lying, conniving scumbags. And the ‘normals’ have no one to blame but themselves.

        Liked by 2 people

        • iswhatitis says:

          That’s a big crock of crap right there and pretty much reinforces my impression of the “Q phenom” is a quack narrative engineering exercise.

          And, as a usual “Q phenom” tactic, you’ve worded things in such a way as it would take a lot of words to “deconstruct it”.

          I’m not playing that game.

          But thanks for “feeding” your opinion into my mind and then arguing against that planted stereotype.

          It’s called a strawman.

          Not worth the time to deconstruct.


          • jeans2nd says:

            Is anyone asking you to deconstruct? Is anyone forcing you to read Q? Is anyone hurting you by reading and commenting on Q?


            Why bother reading or commenting on something for which you have no interest, something that does not affect you, something that is not hurting you?
            What will it hurt you to pass people by who are interested in Q?

            Or are you the one who is requiring others to be interested in only things in which you are interested?
            Gee wiz

            Liked by 2 people

            • iswhatitis says:

              I’m sorry but when grandiose claims are made, with no supporting evidence provided, on an open discussion forum, I don’t understand why they should be exempt from critical examination, discussion or questions.

              Scammers don’t just get to “politely request” that no one asks them for evidence and just believes “on faith” and ask you to politely “scroll past” if one feels inclined to ask “where’s the beef?”.

              Its a fair question in a discussion forum.

              Why do you feel the posts should go unchallenged and the questions unasked?


              • daughnworks247 says:

                Eyeroll. “Unchallenged”? Good heavens, those posts are run through a wringer. Funny though, my personal weakness is physics. During a discussion involving physics, I stand back, read and learn. It’s an effective strategy.
                No need to fight here. We’re supposed to be on the same side.

                Liked by 2 people

                • iswhatitis says:

                  So, unlike other posts here on CTH (and other forums), “Q posts” are run through some “wringer” and because of that (even though this “wringer”-running is not obvious) we are not allowed to ask questions (like where’s the supporting evidence) about them?

                  But other threads and posts are fair game for having “discussion” and asking questions (like where’s the supporting evidence). Just not “Q posts” (due to some pre-wringing)?

                  Have I got it straight?

                  Just trying to learn your rule-book.

                  Also, have you noticed it looks like I’m being “tag-teamed”? Every reply is a different poster, hitting me with a new angle. The OP’s haven’t returned yet to reply themselves.

                  It’s a tag-team effect.


              • Deb says:

                Of course, but this is a civil site. Unless you feel the person is a troll, be polite and try not to sow division and discord.

                I’m not a Q fan, and I can have my opinion and still manage to avoid insulting people who do follow Q. Try it.

                Liked by 2 people

      • Peace be with you. Enjoy the show.


    • wyntre says:

      Well, where are the links to this info?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      This Q?

      Exposed – Creator Of QAnon Speaks For The First Time

      Liked by 2 people

      • For Eyes says:

        Thank you for posting that


      • daughnworks247 says:

        Nothing to do with Micro at all. Posobiec proved that, in his clumsy attempt, yesterday.

        Liked by 1 person

      • cozette says:

        Donna in Oregon Jack Posobiec who produced the segment you posted is part of the scam Sundance and the researchers on the 8 chan Q anon research board just revealed. The one that fooled Your Voice America and has embroiled MAGA supporters in a.ugly and divisive drama just when we should be pulling together to help our president win the mid terms. Microchip, who laughably claims to be Q, is a self described troll. The proofs offered have been widely debunked and videos are available every where for those interested in the TRUTH. Both Jack and Micro are now the laughstock of the chans. Just like with Jacks other scam, this “expose” is meant to fool good hearted, trusting normies who don’t know enough about tech to realize theyre being lied. The intent was the same. Divide Trumps base so the Democrats regain control. BTW the chans are universally acknowledged as the reason why Trump won. 90% of the pro Trump memes came from the chans. Theyre the ones who digested document drops, organized the material, turned it into memes and sent it on to reddit then on to the normies. Even Hillarys team acknowledges the chans viral role. That is why the #fakenews media and #fakealt media are desperate to discredit Q which is Trumps chan army. If they can take out the chans and divide the alt medi Trump and our country will be destroyed. Midterms are the Lefts last chance to regain power. Does it make sense to mess with Trumps greatest citizen asset in this war? Does it make sense to align with the people who HATE us and the president?

        Liked by 3 people

        • Albertus Magnus says:

          Q followers are like the Branch Davidians and the Jim Jones Temple crowd. No point in arguing with them, they will not believe differently until their death. Since they appears to support MAGA, it is pointless to try to reason with them. While it is a said commentary on elements of our MAGA movement that some of us are incapable of just trusting PDJT to handle this and to let us know when to act but need false “important insiders” to keep them from losing hope, at least they support our MAGA team.

          Although I often fail in ignoring them, I try to remind myself that my best response to the LARPING warmed-up Q posts (that are just them spinning whatever comes on various trusted sites), is to shake my head at the incredulity of some people who share my values and vision for America.

          God bless all of us, even the easily fooled and the gullible.


        • iswhatitis says:

          So if the real goal here was to discredit Posobiec, it looks like a success, no?

          After all, he is now the “laughstock of the chans” where he was not just before this.

          So, he’s being discredited here.

          Sounds like the campaign was a success – has gotten “Q” to see Jack as a “laughstock”.

          I see that as a divide was created that did not exist. The talk is “avoiding divisiveness” while at the same time, “division” is the result among those talking “avoiding divisiveness”.

          Be wary.


        • iswhatitis says:

          cozette says: “BTW the chans are universally acknowledged as the reason why Trump won.”

          That is some serious hyperbole there. It really is.


      • smartyjones1 says:

        Yeah, one of the larpers confessed.
        There were no claimed arrests.

        Get in the game, move on. November is coming.


  20. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 11 people

  21. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  22. Landslide says:

    Louie Ghomert just on Lou Dobbs. Said he has tried to get Paul Ryan & Kevin McCarthy to get wall funding done and in Louie’s words, “There were crickets.” He said he’s told them that this is what got PDJT elected and will get everyone out to vote Nov. 6th. He said he thinks PDJT should “continue with that” in regard to saying he will veto spending bill if no wall funding. I agree. God bless you, Louie, for fighting and representing US! He also said he’s supporting Jim Jordan for Speaker.

    Liked by 17 people

  23. kea says:

    An actor who stands for the flag?!?!? I am shocked!!!

    Actor Kevin Sorbo: ‘Nike Blew It’ with Colin Kaepernick Ad

    Liked by 7 people

  24. CopperTop says:

    Stu Evans. Meadows finally named him. Here are the relevant texts and dates. It’s noteworthy that Stu is pushing back on DOJ use of FISA….and there is a sarcastic ‘thanks NSD’ at the end of another text where Toscas is reported to have told Stu everything…Long ago I thought this text would shed considerable light on the intent of DOJ to circumvent procedure (in particular what to do about FISA requests that still have parties who could be interviewed instead)

    Portions of these dates still have redactions. These are the texts that pertain to a ‘Stu’

    04/08/16 “Remind me to tell you what came up st the end of convo with toscas. Punchline is it ends with andy telling Toscas that he is going to ask me to follow up with Stu on that joint venture stuff.”

    08/10/16″Remember what it was. Toseas already toid Stu Evans everything.
    l ·called to set up a meeting, he already knew ~ l\n\nThanks nsd….”

    10/16/15″And l’m sorry, {redacted…I always thought it was Stu by CT] – and l just don’t get alang? No. He insists on different investigative p~aths OI about whether the new office made material misrepresentations in their FISA application, leading to the case to be (LOOK CLOSELY this is OCTOBER 2015…which is interesting)

    Liked by 3 people

  25. kea says:

    LOLOLOLOL So out of touch!!! LOLOLOLOL

    Disney Rebooting ‘Party of Five’ with Deportation Plot and an Immigrant Family

    Liked by 1 person

  26. rsanchez1990 says:

    President Donald “I guess I have a magic wand” Trump!

    Liked by 2 people

  27. wyntre says:

    Liked by 9 people

  28. patrickhenrycensored says:

    BREAKING: Newly Revealed Email Shows Google’s Bias Against Trump In 2016 Election, Report Says

    Liked by 3 people

  29. Katherine McCoun says:

    Interesting take on SJW politics and its impact on culture. Christian leaders taking a public stand on the issues. Anyone can sign on to support/agree.

    Liked by 3 people

  30. DanO64 says:

    LiveLeaks has the CTH write up about SpyGate. The word is spreading.

    Liked by 3 people

  31. duchess01 says:

    News | The White House – 09/10/2018

    Liked by 1 person

    • WinnieThePooh says:

      Thank you for the link. What an interesting website to explore. Shows that parts of the government are actually functional. The POTUS staff meeting transcripts are amazing to read. DJT is an experienced, successful CEO and is running the business of the US responsibly.

      Liked by 3 people

  32. dreamguardian007 says:

    Just watched interview with Carter Page on Hannity, and I read Nick Weil’s “Carter Page timeline” that Sundance retweeted earlier.

    It struck me that he is the Boy Scout in all of this. He seems genuine, earnest and sincere to me. Perhaps a bit of a rube, but who among us wouldn’t be in the circumstance in which he found himself?

    Liked by 5 people

    • Rene says:

      Only problem I have with the characterization of a boy scout is he is very, very smart. Very educated. So I wonder if his persona is somehow a cover. Something just doesn’t seem right. He does seem a bit of a rube, but is he?


  33. Donna in Oregon says:

    President Trump may want to build a wall on the Canadian side and put ICE at the train stations too:

    Feds: Immigrants smuggled through train tunnel into Detroit
    Detroit Free Press Published 5:05 p.m. ET Aug. 29, 2018

    Liked by 4 people

    • fred5678 says:

      In Senate hearing early 2002 (!!!) BP testified that train tunnel from Canada to Detroit was used by MANY illegal aliens. With no detention rooms, aliens were asked for an mailing address to mail their court summons. When they said they had no address in US, they were given a form to fill in and mail back when they had an address. Guess what the parking lot outside ICE/BP office was filled with?? Discarded forms. What a joke!!

      Liked by 2 people

  34. nimrodman says:

    Ingraham on Fox explaining that not only will NFL NOT implement their new kneeling policy, they’ve also contributed $100 Million dollars to “social justice organizations”.

    KA-CHING !!!

    Leftists just got their new piggy bank to replace the void left by Mulvaney derailing their CFPB gravy train.

    Also said NFL is consulting or collaborating with Soros’ organizations and lefty “Something Something for American Progress” foundation
    … or something.

    Leftists’ bank account refilled, Antifa onward !!!

    Y’know, if these issues were so important to the kneeling players, a bunch of them are rich enough to fund foundations and initiatives themselves.

    But as I predicted in a comment last week, the Left’s real goal was to get Whitey’s money.

    Owners’ money.
    Fans’ money.

    And so they have.

    And in another prediction I’ll make now:

    Huge pallets of this money will disappear into “initiatives” and “foundations” and “communities” and there’ll be much less to show for it than the dollar amount (huge) would lead one to expect.

    Liked by 4 people

  35. nimrodman says:

    Well, I’ll stretch this to fall under PresTrump and his administration, in that it’s his FBI that’s done such a pi$$-poor job investigating it.

    New article from UK Daily Mail with a couple photos of the hotel room I don’t recall seeing, including them in case they’re new.

    REVEALED: Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock had $1.3million held across FOURTEEN bank accounts when he launched deadly shooting spree

    • Stephen Craig Paddock, 64, had a fortune of more than $1.3million
    • The retired real-estate investor held his money across 14 banks
    • He also had a massive collection of weapons and accessories worth $62,000
    • The families of his 58 victims will collect an equal share of those assets

    The Las Vegas gunman had a mysterious fortune worth more than $1.3million held in separate bank accounts at the time of his shooting spree.

    Stephen Craig Paddock, 64, also owned a shocking collection of weapons and firearm accessories, found in his home and his Mandalay Bay hotel room where he launched his attack, worth $62,000.

    Las Vegas police said Paddock kept his money in 14 bank accounts and in his last two years of life he splashed out $1.5million, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

    Following his shooting spree on October 1, 2017, Paddock took his own life and left no will, leaving his mother to inherit his fortune.

    She decided to give the money to the families of the 58 people killed in the horrific shooting.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Blind no longer says:

      Well how bout this. The fake news media and the FBI said Paddock was deeply in debt due to his gambling….somebody lied!

      Liked by 1 person

    • iswhatitis says:

      While it’s good to be learning more about this tragedy, I don’t know about some of how that article is written.

      I guess it’s that, even though I don’t have near that kind of money, I don’t consider 1.3M to be a “fortune, in 2018. It’s barely enough to retire on (queue-up Austin Powers image).

      Heck, it probably won’t be too long before SJW’s and their college loans amount to that or more (for a nice, juicy, SJW degree).

      And a $62,000 collection doesn’t sound like enough to be called a, “massive collection”. Maybe “big” or “large”. Probably not even “shocking”, depending on the individual items.

      That writing just sounds like SJW “snowflake” language to me.


      • Deb says:

        It’s the Daily Mail. What do you expect? Most professional “journalists” are SJW snowflakes, their journalism schools make sure of it.


        • iswhatitis says:

          I know. It’s a sad state of affairs.

          At least we can glean new information from between the snowflake language.

          It still looks quite plausible (even likely) there is a lot more to this story than the narrative they are pushing. Maybe in 50 years people will learn the truth.


    • WSB says:

      Careful about those photos.

      I found that some of the photos were mirror images of the layout. The Hotel actually had the images mirrored on their own website, so you would have to use the floor plan to figure out what is where.

      I believe this is the actual layout, and the double double bed picture is the connecting room. I do not remember seeing the entire window taken out, though.


    • Plain Jane says:

      Something wrong with WordPress tonight. I can’t like and have to sign in everytime I try to comment.

      Liked by 1 person

    • WSB says:

      Now that I look at these again, the orientation seems to be correct. The floorplan i have down thread shows a table for 8 that is under the bar stoools you see in the photo.

      From what I knew of the incident, it looked as though those tables were replaced by the large lounge chairs that are joined together into what looks like a tub. See the bar stools there on the left but the door into the Master bedroom? All fits.

      Also, the double double room with the window on the left and the beds on the far wall also fit. That room is not on the floor plan I posted. There is a little door on the upper left in the plan I posted… that is the connecting door to this room. This room was the one the room service tray was shown outside in the corridor.


  36. Donna in Oregon says:

    Soros and Obama interfering in our politics worldwide:

    Earlier this year, Patrick Gaspard, the former Obama White House political director who now runs Soros’ Open Society Foundations, said he asked the billionaire how he viewed the organization’s role at a time when so much of Soros’ work is under assault.

    “This is the moment we were built for,” Soros responded, according to Gaspard.

    His New York-based Open Society Foundations now spends $940 million a year in 100 countries, promoting values such as free speech and free elections, according to the group. In the United States, the Open Society spends $150 million a year financing groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood.

    For a period of time, Soros was the largest private donor in Russia, funding initiatives such as an anti-torture program, according to the foundation. Two years ago, Putin’s government effectively banned Soros’ group from distributing funds in the country, calling it “undesirable” and “a threat to the fundamentals of the constitutional system.”

    Last week, Putin suggested that Soros’s spending around the world resembles the kind of political interference that U.S. intelligence officials blame on Russia.

    “He intervenes in things all over the world,” Putin told Austrian television. “But the State Department will tell you that it has nothing to do with that, that this is the personal business of Mr. Soros.”

    Liked by 2 people

  37. WSB says:

    Laura was just on with Steve Bannon on Fox. Yucckily. She could not keep her mouth shut, but Bannon was able to get a few words in and also made the interview very interesting.

    Lots of tidbits in this interview. His new movie, being one.

    If anyone knows how to find the clip quickly, my thanks!

    Liked by 4 people

  38. citizen817 says:

    Carter Page on Hannity (5 min)

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  40. kinthenorthwest says:

    Guess this is my first time I’ve seen a pic of Cruz in a while…
    Dang what happened to him. to him in the last couple of years or is it just me.


    • Albertus Magnus says:

      Another wolf trying to fit back into the sheep’s clothing. Hope he wins, we need the numbers but if anyone can be considered a modern day BA to the conservative movement in this country, it is teddy. (McCain was an enemy but never a BA because he was never a conservative to begin with).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s