U.S. District Judge Rejects Lawsuit Attempting To Block Border Wall…

Still no word on the turrets and sharks with lasers idea, but we’re holding steady…

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Tuesday sided with President Donald Trump’s administration and rejected an attempt by the state of California and environmental groups to stop the government from building a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico.

The lawsuit filed in a San Diego federal court alleged that Trump’s proposed wall violates federal environmental standards, as well as constitutional provisions regarding the separation of powers and states’ rights.

The plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel to stop the administration from pursuing the barrier until it demonstrates compliance with environmental laws.

The wall, a key item for Trump’s political base of supporters, has become a sticking point in talks to keep alive a federal program that protects from deportation young people who were brought to the United States illegally as children.

In his latest budget proposal to Congress, Trump requested $23 billion for border security, most of it for building the wall.

Curiel said his decision on Tuesday was not based on whether the underlying decisions to construct the wall “are politically wise or prudent.” Rather, Curiel said the Trump administration had not exceeded its legal authority in pursuing the project.  (read more)

This entry was posted in Decepticons, Donald Trump, Illegal Aliens, Mexico, NAFTA, President Trump. Bookmark the permalink.

275 Responses to U.S. District Judge Rejects Lawsuit Attempting To Block Border Wall…

  1. gmein says:

    As to the design and I hope it has been discussed. Be sure to build it 250 feet inside our border line so we can have an access road running parallel to it so we can defend it from the south side as well.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. gmein says:

    Meaning: Our presence along with the wall is the deterrent. We can kinda draw one of those “lines in the sand” 250 feet away. They might be smart enough to understand that, Comprendo?????


  3. Blacksmith8 says:

    The WALL cometh


    Liked by 1 person

  4. Bendix says:

    Environmental issues that arise can be dealt with at that time. No reason to not get started on a wall.
    The environment is not the same all along the border, if something isn’t working along a particular segment, we can fix that.
    I love nature and wildlife, clean air and water as much as anyone.
    I think the wall may actually help protect those things, in some cases.
    BTW, where is the “if it saves only one life” standard, that the liberals use to justify all kinds of government overreach, when it comes to the border?
    Protecting our border is, if not the most, one of the most legitimate functions of a federal government.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. gmein says:

    Yes to Bendix and the great BTW. The Maxrist, Leftist, Activist actually were concerned with “if it saves only one life”, the Kate Steinle case ring a bell. But, it just so happens it was not Kate Steinle’s life. The life that mattered more to them was the seven time deported illegal who did not know what was in the tee shirt when the gun went off, duh! The gun was stolen from a law enforcement officer, he still gets off. I live in this toilet of California, it really needs to be flushed. Send Mexico’s excrement back ASAP. Build that beautiful wall. May POTUS DJT declare it a National Treasure and Historic Landmark. AMERICA IS GREAT AGAIN on this side for AMERICAN DREAMERS.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. vfm#7634 says:

    The Left was chucking a while back because Curiel would be adjudicating this case. Looks like they have to eat crow… once again.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s