October 2016: James Comey Friend Benjamin Wittes Discusses “The Insurance Policy” Against Trump…

Researchers will share the value of pausing, going back, and looking upon previous information with new insight gained from current discoveries.  In hindsight there are many contexts that shape a new understanding.  Fired FBI Director James Comey ran a corrupt and heavily political organization. He himself helped to shape the politics of it.

On Comey’s watch he allowed the FBI to become a weaponized tool against political enemies.   The upper-level officials within the FBI are now under scrutiny as their actions are increasingly transparent in their political motives.  With James Comey sitting in the sunlight, I doubt there is a more apropos example for the value of hindsight-review than to visit the 2016 writing of Benjamin Wittes.

Mr. Wittes is a close personal friend of Mr. Comey, and was the go-between used by Director Comey to leak information to the media, and specifically to the New York Times.

Three days after the FBI secured the FISA “Title-1” surveillance authority over former Trump campaign official Carter Page (using the Clinton-Steele Dossier), Benjamin Wittes wrote a column in his blog titled: “What if Trump Wins” – “We need an insurance Policy“.

Excerpt:

October 24th, 2016 […]  The point is that there is no reason at this stage to imagine that the legislature will be a viable venue for push-back, which is a shame considering the powerful set of tools at its disposal.

The Coalition of All Democratic Forces should certainly see what kind of use it might make of the legislature, but realistically, we should probably expect that the coalition’s job in Congress will be to prevent Trump from passing anti-democratic legislation. That is, the task in Congress will be a negative one of denying Trump the use of the Article I powers, not the positive one of the coalition’s using them itself.

That leaves the tool that will certainly be available: the courts. The courts have a few obvious advantages, starting with hundreds of independent judges of both parties whom Trump cannot remove from office and who don’t have to face his supporters in forthcoming elections.  (read more)

I strongly suggest everyone go back and read the entire October 24th, 2016 article written by James Comey’s close friend. –SEE HERE– While you are reading it remind yourself of what has taken place in the fourteen months since President Trump did actually win the election.

Compare the writing of Benjamin Wittes to the actions taken by the DOJ, the FBI, James Comey and every participant inside the enterprise.

With hindsight applied, that October 24th 2016 outline could be considered a road-map for how the DOJ and FBI intelligence apparatus, specifically the “small group” within it, conspired to carry out exactly what Wittes was suggesting.

Even the “insurance policy” language used by Comey’s friend strikes a familiar cord.

No doubt about it… the removal of a democratically elected President Donald J Trump was “their plan” all along.  Transparently planned and openly discussed prior to the election.

.

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, FBI, media bias, President Trump, Press Secretary - Trump, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

479 Responses to October 2016: James Comey Friend Benjamin Wittes Discusses “The Insurance Policy” Against Trump…

  1. WSB says:

    Amos Turk’s first wife was Pearl Bergman Turk who spent a lot time in Palestine. Still researching.

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get this………

    Tamara Cofman Wittes was in the Obama Administration/Clinton State Department from 2009 until 2012. Looks to be a real left-winger at the Brookings institute.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamara_Cofman_Wittes

    Tamara may be in the crosshairs of the IG report on the State department, which is maybe why her husband was so insistant about creating an opposition force against the Trump administration if he won.

    The end.

    Liked by 7 people

  2. WesternWhere says:

    Immediately after the election in an effort to educate myself, rather unfortunately I found and I listened to Witless’s podcast, Rational Security.

    I despise the man. It is my fondest desire that he be flogged in the public square for his hand in all this sedition. While hundreds of deplorables walk up to stocks to shout “Boom” in his stupid face as payback for his incredible hubris.

    If you are not mad enough about all this already, please go listen to equally venal Preet Brahara’s podcast. Where during his interview, Witless describes, in detail, how he would kick Putin’s ass in a fair fight. His rationale for taking down Validmir Putin, with a single side kick to the chest, is that Putin’s machismo is toxic to global security.

    I kid you not, it was like listening to clueless 14 year old boys circle jerking about GI Joe and Kung Fu. I find it hard to believe that these nitwits who seem to be completely lacking in self-awareness have reached positions of power and influence.

    Dunning and Krueger, I hope, are taking notes.

    Liked by 10 people

  3. Paul Killinger says:

    Surely this fellow traveler didn’t initiate the term “Insurance Policy” himself. And I doubt the FBI dweebs did either. I wonder who actually coined it… And could it have been the actual code name of their secret operation?

    Liked by 4 people

  4. ZooNTexas says:

    Does this guy look like Arte Johnson or is it just my bad sense of humor? I was thinking “very interesting but stupid”.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Shark says:

    I can’t screenshot now. But someone had better save WITTS blog post

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Nat says:

    Future Unlocks Past

    Like

  7. SSI01 says:

    In other words, a coup d’etat exactly as I was telling people – and being looked at like I was crazy.

    This evening I was with the wife watching an episode from a long-running television series about police in NYC. One of the episodes concerned the actions of a man whom the chief male protagonist stated was more or less a Nazi or reactionary who spewed hate for the sake of ratings, and was positing nonsensical theories of government encroachment on our rights as citizens during his inflammatory speeches. The villain was made to be a sort of Rush Limbaugh on steroids. He was made to look somewhat psychotic and out of touch w/reality. I looked at the date of broadcast which I believe was 2013. I wondered aloud to the wife how many people who watched that episode when it first aired in ’13 ever in their wildest dreams thought they would see information reach us, the citizens, confirming the “villain” in the episode was actually right on the money in his statements. The only thing that stopped this stuff in its tracks was Trump’s election; otherwise, we’d be well on the road right now to an eventual dictatorship in this country, the destruction of our political system, the opening of our borders, and the demonization of patriots, Christians, home schoolers, and anyone else who didn’t spout the liberal progressive agenda.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. MaineCoon says:

    WSB, since you’re on a roll of researching wives, I’m re-posting mine on Priestap’s wife, MIL & FIL. It was a late posting on another thread.
    ——
    I took a bunny rabbit trail. Q said to follow the wives. In Priestap’s case it would be wife + MIL.

    I stumbled upon a video by urban moving (?), entitled “Bill Priestap FBI CI Chief And His Wife Sabina Menschel, The Fed/Mossad”

    Naturally, I watched it. I can’t vouch for who made it or all the data, but below are confirmed interesting wife + MIL facts, plus a bonus of FIL.

    1. FTA: Ronay Menschel, Sabina’s mother, Elected to New York Fed Board of Directors
    March 19, 1998

    NEW YORK—Ronay Menschel, president of Phipps Houses and its subsidiary, Phipps Houses Services, Inc., has been elected to the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, it was announced today.

    https://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/news/aboutthefed/1998/oa980217.html

    2. Ronay was one of the people Ed Koch’s said was behind his career. This NY article gave her background prior back prior to her marriage, Congressional staffer.

    FTA: Mrs. Menschel denied that she herself was “the woman behind Ed Koch” although he said so.

    3. Richard Menschel, Sabina’s father, senior director Goldman Sachs

    https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/wall-street-donors/richard-l-menschel.html

    4. He says Sabina worked for K2 Intelligence, which was founded by Kroll, who he states is the Mossad connection.

    https://relationshipscience.com/organization/k2-intelligence-1876940

    5. K2 Intelligence, a private investigative company that works for the government. An article, “Is your partner having an affair? There is nothing that the new generation of private investigators can’t uncover, from affairs to multimillion-pound corporate fraud.”

    FTA: Corporate-intelligence gatherers in the new era often work quietly behind the glare of numbers on screens, assembling crack teams of analysts mining code for patterns, anomalies and clues in seams of  big data. Less Mr Bond, more Mr Robot. Jules Kroll, the original corporate spy who founded J Kroll Associates in 1972, now presides over K2 Intelligence with his son, Jeremy. The firm’s tasks have included applying data-mining techniques used by governments for uncovering terror plots to help trace the billions lost in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi-scheme scandal.

    http://www.tatler.com/article/best-private-investigators-london-affair-fraud

    Urban Moving attributes all of the above to be cut outs. Priestap is under wraps — by everybody.

    Liked by 9 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      The video I referenced above didn’t transfer. Here we go..

      Liked by 2 people

      • WSB says:

        Wow…spinning! Fabulous connection!!!!!

        Wittes mother, even though she worked formthe FDA, was a statistician. Extensive. Priestap’s wife takes it into the 21st century. Not to mention her background.

        We should check out Burr and Warner spouses. This may be drawing that line to the secret society.

        Oh, and PS, Goldman Sachs shows up again. When the 2007 crash occurred, my taller half was rather pissed that Lehman Brothers went down, as it was one of the better houses on Wall Street… and equally ticked off that Goldman Sachs survived, as it was one of the most ‘batsh!t crooked pieces of crap’!

        It was predetermined which firm would lose out, Lehman lost on some whim, and here we are.

        Liked by 2 people

  9. honestyoz says:

    SD There is one thing I dont understand can you please help. Pistol Pete and Laydown Lisa have the most unromantic text msgs conceivable if they are having a steamy affair behind their wife and husband. Txt about Hillary are a passion killer where are the I want your throbbing you know what rather meet me in the SCif?

    Liked by 2 people

    • covfefe999 says:

      In official letters it was explained that personal texts were not included and personal info from work texts was redacted. We’re not seeing all of their communications. Also keep in mind that they had other (personal) phones, they are mentioned in some of the FBI phone texts.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Matthew LeBlanc says:

        The irony of ironies would be they had enough shame to send sexts on personal devices but acts of treason being discussed didn’t cause them to switch phones.

        Like

  10. Shark says:

    Now I’m reading this rats posts, here is a good one
    https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-explosive-trump-story-take-deep-breath

    Liked by 1 person

    • Patrick Blasz says:

      Notice the self-authenticating of the allegations. Not proven but because the authorities are taking it very seriously, it’s as good as having been proven. Classic fellow traveler technique of bootstrapping their lies into truths.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Realist says:

    All roads lead to Bath House Barry HUSSEIN Soetero OHOMO the Serial LYING, Document HIDING, BC FORGING, DEVOUT MUSLIM , according to ALL his Indonesian school contemporaries, ILLEGITIMATE, you cant be NBC with a FOREIGN NATIONAL as a ‘father’ no matter WHERE you are born, President and he and his CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC DemoncRAT REGIME who have INFESTED all the alphabet organs of State with OBAMUNISTS who did , and STILL do, their “masters’ bidding – Oh and then there’s the RINO’s like McCain, Graham, Rubio, Romney, Bush etc etc who are just the icing on the DemoncRAT cake.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. woohoowee says:

    Hoooo Boy! Sundance! Get a load of this one…….:

    January 29, 2017 – Benjamin Wittes

    -snip-

    Whether President-elect Donald Trump and his advisers know it or not, a complex challenge in the field of intelligence law will confront the new president almost immediately when he takes office: The legal authorization for one of the intelligence community’s most important collection programs is set to expire on December 31, 2017.

    -snip-

    What’s more, despite the anxieties expressed over 702, particularly in the wake of the Edward Snowden leaks, there have been no serious allegations that the 702 program has been the subject of abuse, and there is a lot of evidence that it has been used responsibly. There is strong bipartisan support for the program among members of both the House and Senate intelligence committees. As of November 7, in other words, the only serious question about 702 reauthorization was whether it would be a “clean reauthorization”—one without significant changes—or whether Congress would seek to build in some limited number of additional protections.

    Mr. Trump’s election, however, substantially complicates the reauthorization picture. This is a man, after all, who campaigned promising abuses of power involving the intelligence community: spying on people because of their religion, torture, and retaliation against political opponents. This is also a man who, after the election, has left open the possibility of removing FBI director James Comey because the director concluded a criminal investigation without bringing charges against Mr. Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton. We often think about 702 as an NSA authority, but it is also to a significant degree an FBI authority. Thus, the person and the integrity of the FBI director is critically important to the integrity of the program. When a president openly contemplates violating the strong customary norm against firing the FBI director, based on the president’s predetermination that a citizen is guilty of a crime absent evidence, and replacing that person with someone acceptable to himself, it inevitably casts 702 in a very different light.

    -snip-

    First, the president-elect should immediately cease the speculation about replacing Director Comey. Comey is not a popular man these days in either political party, but his removal for refusing to indict Hillary Clinton would constitute the most dramatic politicization of the intelligence community since the Watergate era. Though the president undoubtedly has the raw constitutional authority to fire Comey, it would be a grave breach of the presidential obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed to fire an investigator for concluding that a U.S. citizen had committed no crime. If President-elect Trump wishes for Congress to continue reposing in him the awesome collection powers associated with 702, he immediately must cease contemplating such abusive behavior.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/to-preserve-an-important-u-s-intelligence-tool-trump-needs-to-set-a-different-tone/

    Y’all really should READ THIS ONE!

    Liked by 9 people

    • TDU_Weight says:

      Sounds like more James “Lordy” Comey pillow talk.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Ziiggii says:

      THIS IS A GREAT FIND WOOHOO!!!

      that is a REALLY good read…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ziiggii says:

      The burden is entirely on the new administration, and on Mr. Trump personally, to instill in Congress and in the public the kind of confidence that will make reauthorization possible. To this end, the new administration should take the following five steps:

      First, the president-elect should immediately cease the speculation about replacing Director Comey.

      Second, the president-elect needs to choose Justice Department leadership of genuine stature and bipartisan regard.

      Third, the president-elect needs also to choose a CIA director of genuine stature and bipartisan regard.

      Fourth, the president-elect needs to work with the bipartisan leadership of the two intelligence committees to verify publicly that he has not altered the NSA’s operating authorities or guidance—or, alternatively, that any changes he does make are lawful and prudent.

      Fifth, and almost too obvious to mention, the incoming administration needs to assiduously avoid any actions involving the intelligence community that represent any appearance of departure from reasonable public expectations of intelligence community conduct.

      WOW, WOW, WOW – their entire game plan was being shared publicly; if you knew where to look. Reminds me of this comment by Chucky boy:

      that quote from Schumer is made at the beginning of the month… by the end of the month we have Wittes pretty much making the same veiled threat/demand from the IC to a sitting POTUS.

      Un-FREAKING believable!!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ziiggii says:

        All the players that have been looked at and need to be looked at are included in Wittes piece – FBI/Comey, DOJ/Leadership, CIA/Director, NSA/method’s &procedures and finally the IC as a whole.

        I just chalk it up as “coincidence”…🤔

        Like

        • Ziiggii says:

          This doesn’t have much connection to the current subject, other than to support a particular ideology that Wittes seems to favor, but this quote is pulled from a paper that he jointly produced with Jonathan Rauch at Brookings titled, “More professionalism, less populism: How voting makes us stupid, and what to do about it”:

          The literature on voter ignorance is one of the oldest, best established, and most dismaying in all of political science. Every so often, journalists and commentators dip into it and emerged “terrified.” In recent years, however, a wave of research has shown ignorance and irrationality to be even bigger problems than previously believed, and has cast new doubt on standard remedies. Neither theory nor practice supports the idea that more participation will produce better policy outcomes, or will improve the public’s appro- bation of government, or is even attainable in an environment dominated by extreme partisans and narrow interest groups.

          https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/more-professionalism-less-populism.pdf

          Their solution?

          …the best way forward is to rebalance the reform agenda away from direct participation and toward intermediation and institutions.

          https://www.brookings.edu/research/more-professionalism-less-populism-how-voting-makes-us-stupid-and-what-to-do-about-it/

          That’s right – BIGGER gov’t and more special interest groups / lobbyists! And these are the high societies “best and brightest” political thinkers…

          Liked by 1 person

      • woohoowee says:

        Did you notice in the 2nd point they didn’t want Sessions?

        Liked by 2 people

        • Ziiggii says:

          yes – and this conclusion quote closing out this piece seems to not aged very well:

          Section 702, in short, is a palatable tool only because we have high confidence in the fidelity both to law and to a certain set of relatively settled expectations about intelligence community behavior. That is, we have high confidence that it is being used responsibly, by responsible people, and for genuine foreign intelligence, not political, purposes. Our president-elect must come to understand that it will survive only as a long as that continues to be the case, and he needs to behave accordingly, or his first year will see the loss of a critically important national security tool.

          Liked by 2 people

          • brh82 says:

            The degree of arrogance and self-righteousness is simply stunning. But at the same time, when I look back at the Democrat family I ALMOST married into, I saw those traits as a lack of education and/or experience, rather than repulsive personality traits that are probably genetic! Phew! I indeed dodged a bullet.

            Like

        • Cow wow says:

          Fought against Sessions vehemently!!!

          Liked by 2 people

      • Cow wow says:

        Ha! And so what did our PDJT do?? Found the best qualified people in our great nation for Cabinet Sectetaries, State, DOJ, OMB…to fulfill our potential! Not some expected bipartisan academics! Another reason to ❤️ and admire PDJT’s discernment and wisdom even more.

        Liked by 2 people

  13. GREENMIRROR says:

    Not so much for that peaceful transition of power are they!

    Comon, Most everyone has been peaceful though then Kenyon Squatter years.

    Get on the MAGA train it’s gonna be a fantastic time!

    Liked by 1 person

  14. honestyoz says:

    What is the evidence that Peter and Lisa are h aving an affair? Where in the texts of 5000 is 1 that shows it? Where is the original source of an affair? There is none.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. honestyoz says:

    What is the evidence that Peter and Lisa are h aving an affair? Where in the texts of 5000 is 1 that shows it? Where is the original source of an affair? There is none.

    Like

  16. honestyoz says:

    What is the evidence that Peter and Lisa are h aving an affair? Where in the texts of 5000 is 1 that shows it? Where is the original source of an affair? There is none.

    Liked by 1 person

    • abstain says:

      Keep that parrot away from the Enter key.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Tonawanda says:

      This is a curious aspect of the messages – not a hint of intimate involvement.

      What is the source?

      Like

    • covfefe999 says:

      In official letters it was explained that personal texts were not included and personal info from work texts was redacted. We’re not seeing all of their communications. Also keep in mind that they had other (personal) phones, they are mentioned in some of the FBI phone texts. I’ve posted one of the letters in several prior threads, don’t feel like doing it again.

      There’s a news report stating that Congress was briefed that Strzok and Page were having an affair. I’ve posted it in several prior threads, don’t feel like doing it again.

      Liked by 1 person

      • honestyoz says:

        Thanks. It seemed always assumed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gda says:

        That’s disappointing. I was looking forward to seeing some texts along the lines of “I want to —- you the way we —-ed Trump”.

        Like

        • BobInFL says:

          I think I saw one text that one of the recipients was having a bad hair day and was also having a pooh-pooh face and the other texter suggests that they should “pet” it out. Sorry don’t have the exact text. That is about as close to a couple I have seen……

          Like

  17. frank field says:

    Wittes. Intelligent evil. Stomach turning evil. Friend of Comey. Friend of Mueller. Enemy of righteousness. Enemy of truth.

    DRAIN IT

    Liked by 4 people

    • Patrick Blasz says:

      Wittes, . . . , one of the most pernicious and insidious people to the Republic.

      Liked by 1 person

      • brh82 says:

        No article ever written has made me more angry than the Wittes one. I contemplate possible acts of revenge, but then i read he often contributes to the Atlantic, which is like being a WaPo or NYT writer, all of which deserve zero nano seconds of my time. Wittes is a zero and, though his face belongs on the collage of the black hats, he is not worth the effort because he is legally a zero.

        Like

  18. Angry Dumbo says:

    FTA:

    “If you believe the FiveThirtyEight electoral forecast, Donald Trump has only between a 14- and 16-percent chance of becoming president. If you believe the New York Times’s “Upshot” forecast, that chance is even lower, around seven percent.

    Given these numbers, it’s tempting to not plan for a Trump presidency. Personally, I’d like nothing more than to sweep the possibility under the high-impact-but-low-probability event rug, right alongside all those asteroid impacts and worldwide pandemics I don’t spend much time preparing for.

    Better yet, I would love to put it in the category of horror movie, the sort of zombie apocalypse I can enjoy imagining knowing that it is impossible.

    But events with a seven percent chance of happening actually take place all the time, and events that have a 16 percent chance of happening take place more than twice as often as that.

    This is why I keep life insurance, even though I have a much lower than seven percent chance of dying this year. And while I don’t think I have a 16 percent chance of major medical expenses either, I still maintain a health insurance policy, as do other healthy people who know what’s good for them. Responsible people plan for disasters of this likelihood; and while the Sunday shows yesterday were full of talk of whether the presidential race is over, a major party candidate for president always has a chance of prevailing.

    Always.

    So our democracy needs a health insurance policy.”

    Context. “Insurance policy” was popularized in the Hillary world of the time. (Fall 2016) It had a meaning of its own. Don’t let the legacy media explain way the Stroke and Page texts.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. benzy says:

    In case anyone had doubts about the accuracy of the “insurance policy” approach and how real it is being utilized (not that anyone following even remotely closely on the Treehouse would have doubts at this point)… here is yet one more example. Remember Judge Curiel or “Mexican judge” fame? He has just been assigned to hear the case wherein the State of California is suing to force the federal government to go through all of the various environmental protection steps before building a wall on the southern border. I’m sure he’ll be totally unbiased and fair… and I’m equally convinced that it was purely random that HE was the judge selected to hear this case. (I wonder if he has written his decision yet, or will he wait until the briefs have been filed

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/08/judge-gonazalo-curiel-border-wall/

    Liked by 2 people

  20. OpenMind says:

    Wittes at Lawfare on October 29th:
    “Comey’s recommendation reflected the unanimous judgment of the career investigative team. And what’s more, a redacted version of the FBI’s memorandum of its interview with Clinton is now public. Comey has publicly explained his team’s process and reasons for decision. There is no basis whatsoever to question the integrity of the FBI’s decisionmaking and investigation, and Trump and congressional Republicans have been reckless in suggesting otherwise.”
    ______
    Well that fell apart. I won’t hold my breath for Wittes to revisit this expert assessment.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. OpenMind says:

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-reinhold-niebuhr-can-tell-us-about-donald-trump

    Wasn’t this Comey’s old twitter handle? Another Lawfare article on October 14th seems to indicate he may have been in close contact with Lawfare. This is a high society verion of the deplorables mindset. CREEPY.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. Ziiggii says:

    supporting evidence…

    Like

  23. LannyD says:

    So Comey tells Witted who tells world thru NY Times. Another nail in the no party client coffin.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Leapin says:

    I think this is an interesting statement.

    Page 455 of 502.
    Strzok-Page Texts.

    Great. This sentence aggravated the s out of me. Trump has threatened a lot of people and he is about to be in control of the MOST PERVASIVE and LEAST ACCOUNTABLE surveillance infrastructure in the world.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. Ziiggii says:

    Liked by 2 people

  26. nuthinmuffin says:

    witness: “Trump is, to be sure, part clown and part showman”
    i’m just so tired of being ruled by condescending progressives…i’m still hoping these projecting clowns get their asses burned

    Liked by 1 person

  27. jeans2nd says:

    Funny you should bring up Wittes.

    Wittes participated in a discussion panel at Brookings 7 Feb 2018, uploaded last night, which included current buymybook-pusher David Frum, Elaine Somethingorother who was a VP Gore whatsits, Wittes, and moderator Whosits. The title of the discussion was “Threats to democracy in the Trump era” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-s9xx-dN5E 1 hr 30 min 03 sec which, perhaps not coincidentally, is the theme for all think tank discussions recently, including some at Heritage and AEI.

    Wittes claimed illness and had little to say, speaking only 3-4 x, most unmemorable.

    Couple three things stood out. The discussion opened taking a show-of-hands on the question of ‘is Pres Trump upholding the Presidential Oath of Office’ to which the answer was, unsurprisingly, overwhelminly ‘NO.” Wittes made the point that the Pres Oath was the only Oath included in the Constitution. Wittes point? No idea.

    Further on, Wittes stated ‘we are not a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who control the laws.’ Um, since when? Never ever taught that in civics class. Hmmm…

    Either moderator Whosits or Frum made a statement conflating Occupy Wall Street w/the Tea Party. Wittes was actually the one who spoke up and said the Tea Party was reminiscent of the Suffrage Marches, in that the Tea Party’s demonstrations were the most orderly and respectful since the marching Suffragets, even cleaning up after themselves. Will pause here to pick up one’s jaw from the ground.
    ~

    Wittes has issued FOIA demands for Pres Trump’s income from foreign sources to Pres Trump’s businesses – which law would that be, exactly, that permits that? – and how much the State Dept is paying to Trump Int’l D.C. for services rendered – what? what services? This guy knows the law and federal bureaucracy? Now that is scary.

    This guy is Comey’s BFF and current attorney-of-record, both of whom are self-acknowledged leakers of classified information and manipulators of Law.
    We noticed.

    The entire discussion was a bash-fest on mostly Pres Trump, some bashing of the specific Republicans and the Republican Party, and glorification of the Bureaucratic Control of The State. Everything.Single.Thing attributed to Pres Trump was actually done by Obama and Bush, and remarkably none of these Mouths ever see that, let alone acknowledge it. Oh yes, HPSCI is irredeemable and Our Only Hope is in the Senate Intel Cmte.
    ya, we got yer number…

    Elaine Whatsits closed by demanding Dem rigid adherence to Party Over People. Frum closed by encouraging the Dems to lie to their constituents to facilitate the Dems’ election in 2018, and quoting a Socialist. Wittes had earlier pointed out that the NeverTrumpers were now so small they all fit into Frum’s living room.
    glad the putz notices something

    Speaking of looking back and previous info, do you recall the Russian spies caught in 2009 who were using Morse for comms? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-10-russian-spies-arrested-in-us/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7861119/Russian-secret-agent-scandal-11th-suspect-arrested-in-Cyprus.html
    We remember.

    They are counting on the Death of The Tea Party to enable their return to power.
    They have hate.
    We have Cold Anger.

    Game On.

    .-.-/—/.-../-.. .-/-./–.-.-.-.
    -.-

    Liked by 2 people

  28. uvaldegirl says:

    Drain the swamp….build the wall….lock her up.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. People like this Benjamin jerk-wad, have increased my water bill due to the fact that after reading about him and his article, I have to get the slime and the sh*t smell off of me.

    Like

  30. Mike diamond says:

    Comey = a total disgrace to the f b i. Agents in the field !!!!

    Like

  31. Pingback: October 2016: James Comey Friend Benjamin Wittes Discusses “The Insurance Policy” Against Trump – IOTW Report

  32. Well, he was right, they really couldn’t afford to take that risk.
    *snicker* *hmphuh* *guffaw*

    Like

    • brh82 says:

      Above jack Rail comment is a tiny thing that says : Pingback: October2016:james Comey (title of this article followed by IOTW Report.. I’ve seen that now and then o following coments here. what does it mean, “Ping back”?

      Like

  33. Bill says:

    Benjamin Wittes is guilty of Sedition, Period – Once again why is he walking around free too?

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Bill says:

    It seems likely that we have corrupt FIAC Judges or at the least very badly compromised Judges walking around free too. How will they ever get all of the cleaned up?

    Liked by 1 person

  35. spren says:

    I became so disgusted while reading the blog of this Witte-less, sanctimonious puke. This mental midget keeps virtue-signalling about the need to protect our democratic processes, and in the next utterance expresses his total contempt for the populists with pitchforks and their lack of ability to make wise choices. He believes that “elites” such as himself should decide things.

    He values the rule of law except when it is inconvenient to serving his cause evidenced by his illegally serving as the conduit to convey Comey’s memo to the NYT. These people are totally undeserving of the blessing of living in America.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Bill says:

    I am taking the following to mean that FISA Ttilte 7 have been cracked using “wiretapping shell game.”. So, once again, we get to see just how impossible it is to control the FISA process/system. It will not matter how many times Congress extends it use.

    FISA must be removed, not renamed removed.

    Did the following occur prior to October 21, 2016 when the first FISA request was approved?

    The trick is for the two agencies to swap places so that the NSA can deny they are wiretapping, and the GCHQ can deny that they are wiretapping. The Brits are trying to escape in between these moves of what a key expert has called the US-UK “wiretapping shell game.”

    This is the first time that news sources have explicitly stated that Obama personally ordered the wiretapping of Trump himself, through Obama officials going to the British, though it has been implied in the past by the suspicious lack of any circumspect denials, even when The New York Times said on January 19 and 20 that “wiretapped communications” went to the Obama White House. No one in the article said “Obama White House—but not Obama personally.”

    Consider how one important person—President Trump—got the clear media message that he was indeed the target of the spying: President Trump told Fox News’s Tucker Carlson that he read this New York Times story of January 20 before he tweeted about Obama “wiretapping” him. White House spokesman Spicer quoted from this article.

    President Trump told Carlson on Fox on March 15 why he tweeted what he did: “Well, I’ve been reading…I think it was January 20…New York Times article where they were talking about wiretapping….I think they used that exact term.”

    http://www.aim.org/special-report/a-watergate-style-threat-to-the-democratic-process/

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s