The Fibber is Caught – Gloria Allred Refuses To Release Yearbook for Independent Authentication…

Notorious political/legal activist, and evidence manufacturer, Gloria Allred, represents a woman named Beverly Young-Nelson who claims Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore assaulted her 40 years ago.

Judge Roy Moore stated he’s never personally met Mrs. Nelson but he was assigned -and presided over- her civil divorce case about 18 years ago.

To prove Moore has met Mrs. Nelson, Gloria Allred produced Nelson’s high school yearbook claiming to contain the signature of Roy Moore.  However, a review of the signature shows considerable evidence that it is fraudulent.  Mr. Moore challenged Allred to present the yearbook for independent authentication.  Allred is refusing.

Even Keith Olberman’s former girlfriend, Katy Tur, see’s through the B.S.:


Attorney/activist Allred is demanding a Senate hearing against Roy Moore, which is absurd because the U.S. Senate has no jurisdiction over Moore as a private citizen running for office.  Allred, an activist and Democrat delegate, is simply attempting to manufacture a political fiasco to benefit her ideological and partisan endeavors.

The signature appears to be entirely fraudulent and manufactured to create a connection between Mrs. Nelson and Judge Moore.

It is clear from a simple review of the inscription that two inks were used, and two different types of handwriting appear present.

Providing further evidence toward Moore’s defense, he notes the “DA” following the signature are specifically the same as the divorce documents he signed for Mrs. Nelson in 1999 (see below):

The “D.A.” does not stand for District Attorney, it stands for “Delbra Adams”, Judge Moore’s former assistant who started working for him in 1987, ten years after the “DA” which appears in Mrs. Nelson’s yearbook.

The evidence showing Gloria Allred manufactured the yearbook seems overwhelming and presumably that’s why she is refusing to allow independent inspection.

This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Election 2017, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

437 Responses to The Fibber is Caught – Gloria Allred Refuses To Release Yearbook for Independent Authentication…

  1. Anniie says:

    didn’t I read somewhere yesterday that her stepson said she was a liar..of course, that could be a lie because they could be at odds..who knows..I will say this about her looks..actually she is an attractive woman..altho, the make up has been put on with a trowel!!!! and that neck is not the neck of a 55 yr. old unless she has the misfortune to age really badly..which is possible.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ladypenquin says:

      Nope. You’re not wrong. I’d place her at mid-seventies. 🙂


      • keebler AC says:

        Moore’s wife was at the same highschool and year as this Beverly. Both look the same age now, older looking than most. Gloria Allwreck looks younger than both.


        • singingsoul says:

          The biggest mistake women make when they get older use makeup specially thick plastered. Oh my pet beef blue eye lids is a give away how old they are.
          Uses as little as possible and by instead good moisturizer and tread yourself with a facial once in a while or do your own. .


  2. jello333 says:

    This is just the latest in a long history of dishonest, no, CRIMINAL court officials. Until we start putting them behind bars, nothing is gonna change. And not just for a couple days like Mike Nifong. People like him, or Bernie De Larionda, or Angela Corey, or Ben Crump, or Marilyn Mosby, or many others… until people like these do HARD time, nothing’s gonna change.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. KBR says:

    The blue ink “additions” seem particularly damning of the claims.

    Reasons for not showing the yearbook might include:

    1) She is using someone else’s yearbook and claiming it is hers:
    Maybe there is no photo or listing of her, many signatures that start with greeting the yearbook’s real owner by full name? Perhaps an engraving of someone else’s name on the front cover?

    2)Perhaps the yearbook in question is not even the yearbook for the claimed year, but for some year too early or too late for her claim to be plausible?

    3) It is her yearbook, for the year said (and she has not aged well at all) but has other “evidence” of forgery? Like:

    Several photos of supposed victim with a guy named Ray or Roy? Perhaps even “most likely to marry first?” Who knows. (And BTW, what was her divorced spouse’s name?)

    Additional “love Ray” or “love Roy” signatures on a photo or several, of some guy in that highschool yearbook named Ray, or Roy, with same handwriting, (perhaps even also referencing Christmas?)

    Back then many who signed with a message somewhere on advertising pages or blank pages, also signed every photo of themselves in that yearbook.

    And BTW, “love, +name” back then was a rather standard signature to people you knew: just as in the 18th century “ever your servant” and “at your service” did not mean the signer was a servant. So “love, +name” did not necessarily indicate romance nor family nor particular intimacy.

    BTW, Perhaps “Ray/Roy the highschooler” and supposed victim “hooked up” at Christmas time BEFORE graduation is such a way that Ray/Roy reminisces (or hints, gossips, reminds all who knew it) about it in the yearbook. Why does everybody seem to assume the Christmas reference refers to the one after graduation, and not the one before graduation?

    Old days, highschool yearbooks, comments:

    HS yearbook subscriptions (sign up if you’re gonna buy one, so we will know how many to order) were taken in late spring of previous school year (in this case 1975-1976) and the number needed was known certainly by early fall of same year (in this case 1976-1977). Most photos are from fall (1976) of the school year: the books would be available by early spring/spring (1977.) Production of a high school annual yearbook was not so fast back then.

    I mention this b/c if someone mentioned Christmas in a yearbook, they probably meant the past one, that is the Christmas just before the time, or just in the nick of time (in this case Christmas 1976) when all (1977) yearbook information had to be turned in to the yearbook publisher.

    Contrary to some remarks, hauling your (last or last-year’s) yearbook around for signatures in the Christmas season- AFTER you had graduated, 7-8 months later – seems so highly unlikely to me as to be ridiculous.

    Yearbooks still exist: how many of you did that? Still carried your yearbook around for signatures the following Christmas? Hmmm?

    How many of your own kids haul (or hauled) their yearbooks around for signatures the Christmas FOLLOWING the spring in which the yearbook was issued? (about 7-8 months later)

    How many of you, having graduated highschool-and either working, seeking work, or in college, or military, or maybe even married and already tending your first child-were still carrying around your HS yearbook asking for signatures by the NEXT Christmas?

    Ridiculous. Nonexistent or extremely rare, as much so then as now.

    Liked by 7 people

  4. vexedmi says:

    Gloria Allred was married, blessed with a child, and divorced.
    Gloria Allred was raped while in Mexico at gunpoint.
    Gloria Allred never reported the rape.
    Gloria Allred had an illegal abortion.
    Gloria Allred has more of a story to hide than Judge Roy Moore.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. HolyLoly says:

    Gloria Allred is such a scoundrel she should be permanently disbarred from practicing law.

    In 2010, she brought out her political long knife and used it on Meg Whitman the last few weeks of her campaign to be Governor in California. In that case, Allred used an illegal alien meme claiming the Whitman’s employed one in their home for many years. It turned out this was one big lie, too, but the damage was done and the Whitmans were smeared.

    The sleazy illegal alien Allred pulled out had been employed by the Whitmans for many years until they discovered that she had lied to them using fraudulent documents to assure them she was here legally, in which case, they fired her. Of course, Allred left out that part of the story and the sleazy illegal who had been treated very well by the Whitmans claimed they were abusive to her and demanded compensation for her ill-treatment.

    After the campaign was over, I read the Whitmans paid off the little whore with a $1,000. settlement to get rid of her.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. David Goodspeed says:

    She should be disbarred

    Liked by 1 person

  7. pageoturner says:

    If you watched the press conference, Allred also displayed a commissioned drawing of the woman done at an amusement park when she was 16 to show how beautiful she was. Someone posted the woman’s actual picture from yearbook. She was very ordinary looking – mousy even, not the stunner the kind artist portrayed her to be.

    BS all around.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. David Goodspeed says:

    Real victims beware!
    permitting Allred to represent your case will be the kiss of death for your case!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. nole2016 says:

    Moore has a strong legal case against these lies….sue em both.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. good grief! what a FOUL woman, Allred


  11. Lets think about this:
    We have a Judge, who has undoubtedly rendered thousands of judgements before the various courts he has administered, affecting the lives and fortunes of many. Over the years he has risen to prominence to include Supreme Court level for the State of Alabama – and I for one can not seem to find anything negative…until recently like in the past couple of weeks. Yes there is the matter of his standing up for his Christian Faith, which, frankly – I agree with.
    The fallacy of the various claims is that they could be remotely true, though if so, WHY are they now just coming out??
    In my opinion, he is, by the nature of his being a Judge, entirely too easy for a disgruntled plaintiff (party of a divorce for example) to take the opportunity to retaliate at this time of vulnerability – especially when the MAGA doctrine hangs in the balance. Not to mention a nice enticement by the left.
    Just my humble Opinion.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. LandoftheFreeHomeoftheBrave says:

    This is even nuttier than it first seemed — and it seemed nutty upon first hearing of it. But two different colors of ink? And the D.A. (Delbra Adams) designation on the yearbook??

    Come on now.

    Liked by 2 people

    • neal s says:

      It strongly suggests that there was another Roy in that class who signed just their first name (Roy in the other color ink) and that the forgers added everything else, including the ‘DA’ thinking it was part of the Judges signature. They were hoping that people wouldn’t look too closely, or think too critically about these things. But they made too many mistakes including different colors of ink and different handwriting styles and not realizing that the DA that was on the divorce papers were not actually part of the Judges signature. They did such a bad job, that ordinary folk can see for themselves from just the photos available on the web that it is a forgery.

      I hope the Judge sues the pants off both the sleazy liar and the other liar she represents.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. voice of reason says:

    Find out who’s paying Allred and you find out who’s behind this.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. shallbe4 says:

    Judge Moore is a fine man — a gentleman with a good heart and strong beliefs which he lives by everyday of his life. I am praying everyday that he is the next Senator of the great state of Alabama.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. sturmudgeon says:

    If the lawyer in ANY case ‘manufactures’ so-called ‘evidence’ in ANY claim, that lawyer should be disbarred… in the case of Allred has factually done this type of thing before… why is she still able to practice law?

    Liked by 1 person

  16. sturmudgeon says:

    should read “in the case of Allred, she has’…etc.


  17. InTime says:

    I do not live in Alabama, but if I did I would vote for Moore. I am a woman. I want assault victims to come forward. However, bimbos who make false allocations continue to make it hard for true victims to be believed. I don’t believe ONE of these women who are mentioned in this story. Not one. Those who have condemned Moore are afraid of his ability to stand. They don’t want him to be one who may uncover their dirty deeds….these stories are a crime to me. Everyone who has spread them from the women, Allred, media and yes, GOP mob, et al and even Ivanka need to be held accountable.


  18. May I offer some thoughts re: Evangelical Christian support of Mr. Moore?
    1. We all bear the shame and the glory of the Cross. When anyone in our Christian family fails, separates, sins, etc. we are hurt because we belong to the same body.
    2. Major characters of the Bible including the Lord were scorned, falsely accused, and even conspired against.
    Isaiah 8:11-13
    A Call to Fear God
    11For thus the LORD spoke to me with mighty power and instructed me not to walk in the way of this people, saying, 12″You are not to say, It is a conspiracy!’ In regard to all that this people call a conspiracy, And you are not to fear what they fear or be in dread of it. 13″It is the LORD of hosts whom you should regard as holy. And He shall be your fear, And He shall be your dread.…
    All who are accused in public opinion of a crime are innocent until proven guilty. I will cheer when Judge Moore goes to court, and then we can see that he or his accusers are brought to justice.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s