Nigel Farage Discusses Latest London Terrorist Attack…

British politician and recent media pundit Nigel Farage appeared on Fox Business News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the latest terrorist attack in London, England.

This entry was posted in ISIS, Islam, Jihad, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Refugees, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

176 Responses to Nigel Farage Discusses Latest London Terrorist Attack…

  1. Michael says:

    Nigel Farage appears to be one of the very few intelligent British politicians.

    Liked by 23 people

  2. M33 says:

    #ResistTrump and yet #AcceptTerrorIsNormal

    I think the left has all this backwards…

    Liked by 21 people

  3. Southern Son says:

    Most of Congress, should Resign their Congressional seat, and Denounce their American Citizenship, to make room for Courageous Patriots like Nigel.
    I share this opinion, because Very Few, that took the Oath to Defend American Citizens and the Constitution, are doing so.
    They do Not Defend Our President, and his Attempt to Protect Americans Lives.
    Press ON! Nigel Farage!!

    Liked by 18 people

  4. Patriot1783 says:

    UK, supposed to track, build a case and make arrest before the terrorist blow up or machete to death your citizens….not the other way around.

    Liked by 10 people

    • the right phoenix says:

      Yep. James Bond always got the bad guys before they took over the world.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Trumpire says:

        I’ve been boycotting Hollywood for many years now and haven’t seen any movies but I’d imagine that today’s James Bond would decry Islamophobia, propagandize that Islam is a religion of peace, call native Brits bigots and racists, have gay sex with a dark skinned Mediterranean man, and hand over secrets to the Iranians along with billions in cash while crying unarmed Brit solders huddle in a small boat as they are taken hostage.

        Liked by 5 people

    • FrenchNail says:

      What does it really mean to be on a watch list?

      According to British Services it takes 60 people to properly surveil someone. So 3 000 highly dangerous people require 180 000 skilled agents on the job doing just that. Who are they kidding????? Add to this 20 000 other potentially dangerous and you need 1 380 000 agents on the force to insure peace on just the domestic terrorism front. ONE MILLIONS PLUS. Are they insane to think nobody can do the math and not laugh? This redefine arrogance and incompetence.

      To be on the watch list = knowing where to knock to inform your family AFTER you commit atrocities.

      Liked by 4 people

  5. Farage: Guarantee that no further radicalization occurs in the prisons we control.
    Stop citizens who travelled to fight with ISIS from re-entering UK
    Expel radicals who spew hatred in the Mosques and Madrasses
    At the very minimum, limit speech on the I-net

    ME: Agreed on all but the last. Instead of limiting free speech, allow them to blab away, but use the intel to identify the radicals and their followers, then round ’em all up!

    Liked by 11 people

  6. Joe Knuckles says:

    Lying Muslim being interviewed on Fox right now.


  7. rumpole2 says:

    UK has 23,000 Islamics suspects wandering about. I assume many have family and friends who support and protect them.


    Liked by 14 people

    • Trumpire says:

      I wrote on an earlier thread that Mark Steyn said that during the height of the IRA bombings there were only 100 people on Great Britain’s terror watch list. Only 100.

      Now they are estimating at least 23,000 jihadis but have only identified around 3000 of them and are only monitoring/watching a very small number of them since it takes about 60-80 people to monitor just one suspect. And with a minimum of 23,000 suspects it would take 1.8 millions people to watch them. A preposterous task.

      Europe has stage four cancer. There is only one hope left, excising the entirely of the cancer (removing all muslims) or face a long painful death.

      It’s going to be brutal either way. One path has life as the outcome the other path has guaranteed death.

      Liked by 5 people

  8. Paco Loco says:

    The raising number of converts to Islam in American prisions should scare every peace loving American.

    Liked by 12 people

    • Yippeekiyay says:

      Very true, Paco Loco. If the UK sets up detainment camps, they will have a problem with managing further radicalization within them as well. Not good for our friends across the pond. Drastic action needs to be taken in order to make the UK a safe place again. Pray for the citizens.

      Liked by 2 people

    • COLibertyBelle says:

      And consider how many were released from our prisons by barack Hussein obama as his parting “gift” to America before he left office. There is plenty of room left in hell for him and his friends, and I believe that when the depths of the evil of which he is a huge part in this country are rooted out, they will be well on their way there.


  9. Nan says:

    I’d like to hear what he said, but the sound is so low all I can hear is a whisper. Is it possible to provide a transcript?


  10. R-C says:

    Some thoughts about the so-called ‘Watch Lists’ that Bartiromo brought up.

    If a subject on a ‘watch list’ actually perpetrates an act of terror, that pretty much exposes the useless nature of the ‘watch list’–does it not? After all, what are they ‘watching’ for? –At what point in the ‘watching’ process does the watching apparatus spring into action and interdict?

    And who is actually ‘watching’? –Are we talking about having the subjects’ communications monitored? –Does ‘watching’ imply hardcore human surveillance? Having run surveillance on subjects before, I know that it’s an involved process requiring many players. If it’s to be ’round-the-clock’ surveillance, you need multiple teams. The ‘footprint’ of the teams gets quite large, and expensive. –But, failing to ‘watch’ at all times equates of failing to protect. If the subject is not worthy of being ‘watched’ 24/7/365, why ‘watch’ them at all?

    The surveillance footprint required to effectively ‘watch’ multiple subjects becomes mind-boggling fairly quickly. The number they’re kicking about in the UK is a staggering 20,000. NO way they have has the capability of ‘watching’ that many people with any kind of persistent focus.

    I would submit that, if a person is deemed worthy of being ‘watched’, that person is UNworthy of admission into the country in the first place.

    Liked by 17 people

  11. (From the screencap:)


    1) Horseshit.
    2) Even if it were true, there is no way they would conclusively know this so soon. And if it were conclusively true, it would be foolish and imprudent to say so publicly at this point.
    3) See (1).

    Liked by 16 people

  12. Anne says:

    Confession of Peter Hitchens, of a former British marxist, published in 2013:

    When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants – from anywhere – as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties. Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people – usually in the poorest parts of Britain – who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly ‘vibrant communities’. If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

    I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was (and most of my revolutionary comrades were,

    Many of these new arrivals, though we revolutionaries welcomed them, knew and cared nothing of the great liberal causes we all supported. Or they were hostile to them.
    Many on the Left still lie to themselves about this.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Trumpire says:

      “I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was”

      Well, isn’t that special Peter.

      Does that mean he’s going to volunteer to be the next person blown up or slaughtered? No, he’s rich and protected.

      He and his ilk created this nightmare but they won’t be the ones paying the price. No it will be the natives, especially the lower classes. And they will pay again and again.

      First being called bigots, marginalized and made economically and culturally poorer.

      Secondly, being the victims of the terrorists knives, cars and bombs.

      Thirdly, they will have to be the ones who eventually go to war (because elitists and marxists like Hitchens don’t fight the wars) or capitulate to slavery, dhimmitude.

      Liked by 7 people

  13. TrialbyTruth says:

    Internment interesting apparently this is being often and openly discussed in Europe. I find it surprising but of course the term there does not carry the same emotional baggage it carries here.

    Liked by 1 person

    • R-C says:

      Why should we accept immigrants to join our communities who are so dodgy that it requires us to watch them, or intern them–at great expense to us? –How does that make ANY sense to anyone, whatsoever?

      It’s simple. Don’t let them in in the first place.

      Liked by 15 people

      • wondering999 says:

        Especially since Britain is an island, you’d think it would be easier to secure the borders, and vet incoming visitors/immigrants. It really is very odd how they are handling things

        Liked by 6 people

        • R-C says:

          They aren’t serious about it. Their pols are mired in political correctness and double-speak.

          The people lack the will to demand better of their political leaders. They appear to be willing to be mowed down in the streets and hacked/shot/bombed into oblivion as long as they appear “inclusive”.

          Liked by 3 people

        • R-C says:

          Perhaps one day the Brits will see a true leader arise who will give them a “This Is Sparta!” moment; galvanizing the queen’s subjects into a steely-eyed resolve to save themselves. Or, not. We’ll see.


        • Donna in Oregon says:


          British Airways Tech Outage Exposes Dangers of Outsourcing, Say Experts

          After British Airways was hit with a technical problem, forcing it to shut down all of its flights at London Heathrow and Gatwick airports, unions are now blaming the fiasco on the company’s decision to outsource its IT department.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Countries on the watch list should have their internet suppressed as part of their sanctions. No worldwide web for them.

        Liked by 2 people

      • phoenixRising says:

        Exactly…or if they’re already here, DEPORT them.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      Funny 🙂 Don’t forget the ever important ‘tone’……..tone is everything. sarc

      Liked by 2 people

    • wondering999 says:

      Wakefield is right. Originally, “internment camps” and “concentration camps” were considered generally acceptable as a solution for conflicts, even humanitarian in nature
      “In the English-speaking world, the term “concentration camp” was first used to describe camps operated by the British in South Africa during the 1899-1902 Second Boer War. Allegedly conceived as a form of humanitarian aid to the families whose farms had been destroyed in the fighting, the camps were used to confine and control large numbers of civilians as part of a Scorched Earth tactic.

      “A report after the war stated that 27,927 Boers (of whom 22,074 were children under 16) and 14,154 black Africans died as a result of diseases developed due to overcrowding, inadequate diets and poor sanitation in the camps. In all, about 25% of the Boer inmates and 12% of the black African ones died. The term “concentration camp” was coined at this time to signify the “concentration” of a large number of people in one place, and was used to describe both the camps in South Africa (1899-1902) and those established by the Spanish to support a similar anti-insurgency campaign in Cuba (circa 1895-1898 [1]), although at least some Spanish sources disagree with the comparison [2].

      “Use of the word concentration comes from the idea of concentrating a group of people who are in some way undesirable in one place, where they can be watched by those who incarcerated them. For example, in a time of insurgency, potential supporters of the insurgents are placed where they cannot provide them with supplies or information.

      “The term concentration camp lost some of its original meaning after Nazi concentration camps were discovered, and has ever since been understood to refer to a place of mistreatment, starvation, forced labour, and murder. The expression since then has only been used in this extremely pejorative sense; no government or organization has used it to describe its own facilities, using instead terms such as internment camp, resettlement camp, detention facility, etc, regardless of the actual circumstances of the camp, which can vary a great deal.”


  14. Ron says:

    Nigel Farage is awesome. He once survived a plane wreck while campaigning.

    Liked by 10 people

  15. citizen817 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  16. Lucille says:

    “Accept Islamic Terror as the New Normal?”
    by Nonie Darwish – June 4, 2017 at 5:00 am
    “The use of terror under this doctrine [Targhib wal tarhib, “luring and terrorizing”] is a legitimate sharia obligation.” — Salman Al Awda, mainstream Muslim sheikh, on the Al Jazeera television show “Sharia and Life”.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tegan says:

      See how it begins! First a tiny seed is planted…”a new normal”…then another pro-Muslim brings it. Up on another program…and, like the Liberals’ playbook, repeating something over and over eventually brainwashing it into “fact.” Terrible problems posting…sorry for errors.

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Anne says:

    There are only 5% Muslims in the Philippines. And they destroyed a Catholic church in Marawi:


    • Ron says:

      Scott Adams made the point that there are only less than 5% homosexuals in America, but yet they have been able to get laws changed and passed.

      What happens when the Muslim population here gets to 10% or 15%?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Michael says:

        As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

        United States — Muslim 0.6%, Australia — Muslim 1.5%, Canada — Muslim 1.9%, China — Muslim 1.8%, Italy — Muslim 1.5%, Norway — Muslim 1.8%

        At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

        This is happening in:

        Denmark — Muslim 2%, Germany — Muslim 3.7%, United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%, Spain — Muslim 4%, Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

        From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for

        Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

        France — Muslim 8%, Philippines — 5%, Sweden — Muslim 5%, Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%, The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%, Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

        At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

        When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

        Guyana — Muslim 10%, India — Muslim 13.4%, Israel — Muslim 16%, Kenya — Muslim 10%, Russia — Muslim 15%

        After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

        Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

        At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

        Bosnia — Muslim 40%, Chad — Muslim 53.1%, Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

        From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and ***ya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

        Albania — Muslim 70%, Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%, Qatar — Muslim 77.5%, Sudan — Muslim 70%

        After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

        Bangladesh — Muslim 83%, Egypt — Muslim 90%, Gaza — Muslim 98.7%, Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%, Iran — Muslim 98%, Iraq — Muslim 97%, Jordan — Muslim 92%, Morocco — Muslim 98.7%, Pakistan — Muslim 97%, Palestine — Muslim 99%, Syria — Muslim 90%, Tajikistan — Muslim 90%, Turkey — Muslim 99.8%, United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

        100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

        Afghanistan — Muslim 100%, Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%, Somalia — Muslim 100%, Yemen — Muslim 100%,

        Liked by 7 people

        • BAMAFan says:

          You might have mentioned your post was adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

          Liked by 1 person

        • LafnH2O says:

          At 100%, If memory serves, the most Radical muslims then begin to terrorize the, somehow, less radical. Then, the mostest, mostest radical begin to terrorize … and so it goes until… what. The aliens can just take over without firing a shot?
          What is the END game here, besides death and destruction?

          Whether a religion (not) or ideology, not very well thought out!

          Great post, Michael. 👍


        • Snow White says:

          And we see how peaceful these savages are in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, especially Somalia../sarc


      • soozword says:

        What happens??? Perfect examples to learn from are Germany, Sweden, France and the UK.

        Liked by 3 people

      • rumpole2 says:

        Stand by for “Squatter” type toilets and… NO TOILET PAPER!!!

        Liked by 2 people

      • woohoowee says:

        The homosexuals used the Human Rights Campaign group, funded by some extremely wealthy donors (mostly homosexuals and parents of homosexual children), to ram their changes through.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Trumpire says:

        Homosexuals make up less than 3% of the population. That seems to be a figure that holds everywhere

        I actually think it is 2% homosexual (1% men 1% women) with 1% being a catchall for every other type of deviant – trans, fetish weirdos etc.

        But your point is well taken. With just a .06% muslim population in the US look how loud and pushy they’ve become even and especially AFTER 9/11. CAIR runs our politicians, infiltrated our government including the DOJ, DOH, FBI, White House, became congressional staffers; changed our training manuals, sued our citizens, brought their refugee invaders here, etc.

        Imagine what they will be like when the hit 1% of the population.


  18. fleporeblog says:

    I can’t fathom how the hell these 23,000 animals that were known to be fighting with the terrorist in Syria and Iraq be allowed ever into the country. Our Lion wold have made sure actual lions were at the airports to eat the sh..t out of them. Yet in the U.K., they are welcomed back as heroes to roam the streets looking for their next kill!

    From the article linked above:

    The figures by the counter-terror agencies laid bare the scale of the potential threat in Britain.

    In the wake of the Manchester suicide bombing it emerged that British authorities were grappling with 500 investigations into 3,000 individuals considered as possible threats, The Independent reported.

    Security sources have confirmed a further 20,000 individuals were said to have been considered “subjects of interest” in the past.

    From the article linked above:

    Around 23,000 jihadist extremists currently living in the UK have been identified by intelligence services as potential terrorists, the Times reports, citing government officials. About 3,000 of those are under investigation as possible threats.

    “The huge scale” of the terrorist threat in Britain has been revealed in the wake of the Manchester bombing, the Timesreported on Saturday, saying the number was disclosed by unnamed Whitehall sources.

    From the article linked above:

    Britain should encourage jihadis fighting in Syria and Iraq to “come home”, the former global counter-terrorism director of MI6 has said.

    However, Richard Barrett, a former counter-terrorism chief at MI5 and MI6, said repentant fighters needed “to know that there is a place for them back at home”.

    From the article linked above:

    The homegrown jihadists fighting for ISIS: How one in four foreigners who have signed up for Islamic State is British – and how half of them are ALREADY back in the UK

    500 of the 2,000 estimated foreign ISIS fighters are believed to be British
    MP believes that figures are ‘nonsense’ and figure closer to 2,000 Britons
    Majority are flying to Istanbul then catching a bus over the Syrian border
    Government reveals that only 23 passports have been seized this year
    More British Muslims fighting for ISIS than serving in the British Army

    From the article linked above:

    A former soldier who is fighting against the Islamic State today warned more than 2,000 British jihadis have joined the death cult.

    The 46-year-old Gulf War veteran is fighting alongside the Peshmerga, the name for the Iraqi Kurdistan forces, and is due to become an official member.

    He said he had been “moved to tears” after seeing families broken up and women and children being beheaded during the conflict.

    Folks this will be a continuing occurrence in the U.K. for years to come unless they wake up like the man in the last article that has had enough. The U.K. needs thousands more like him!

    Liked by 4 people

    • Ron says:

      That’s exactly what I thought when they said they arrested 12 people. Apparently there are just dozens, hundreds, thousands of murderous thugs roaming the streets of London.

      I mean they’re making Jack the Ripper look like a complete amateur.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Michael says:

      “Our Lion wold have made sure actual lions were at the airports to eat the sh..t out of them.”
      Only if the 9th says it is OK because they now run the country. Let us hope the SC ends this madness!

      Liked by 4 people

  19. LibertyVibe says:

    Dear England: You gave the world Wilberforce, Edwards, &Spurgeon. The further you’ve moved away from Christ,the more you’ve become enslaved by a religion,that will not be satisfied until you’re slaughtered.Won’t you come back to the one who wants to save your life?

    Liked by 3 people

    • KBR says:

      I remember a few years ago when researching ancestors in Britain, the number of closed churches seemed appalling to me, but even more so when the closed churches were labelled by the Government “redundant.”

      Now churches are not the same thing as “the church” meaning the faithful.

      And we in the USA have too many closed churches as well as too many empty seats in those that remain open.

      I have to ask those of you who say you do not attend, but still believe: are you adequately teaching your children and, importantly, are you offering them a peer group with similar faith? Do you talk about God freely with others? Or do you limit that to be PC?

      Just wanna know, cause I so rarely hear the word “God” unless it is OMG or associated with a curse these days. And this is especially true when I have the privelege to be among young parents.

      Talking about beerbongs with their littleones at hand seems to prevail. That is all.

      All rhetorcial questions and I expect no real responses. But think about it.

      This fight is GOOD vs EVIL. Period.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Orygun says:

        When I woke up to what was happening in 2009 it was clear to me that this has always been about GOOD vs EVIL. The so called left had been systematically removing all the good messages from the daily lives of our children and replacing it with meaningless jargon’s and nonsense to cloud their sense of right and wrong.
        Our own government has become the largest purveyor of evil in the land through the schools, media and assorted agencies.
        God has been replaced by money and power. Sound familiar.

        Liked by 3 people

      • LafnH2O says:

        Please, here me out.
        I was a long time (10 yrs) member of the last church I attended. This is my story and does not portray any other situation or church. Long story short…
        I approached the Elders and asked why we (the Church) were sending ALL the “offering” to places like Africa or Chile or… when there were homeless and hungry and battered and… in our midst? I was told it was because it was required of them by “whomever”. I asked if we could petition the congregation to stop serving designer coffee and pastries prior to service and give that $ in some way, to the local mission or other. NOPE I asked why. Answer.. People have come to expect it.! Besides, offerings are up and we NEED the $$ !
        Oh, well, could we do anything to help those in need here locally. Answer.. Have to check with our accountants and legal. We’ll get back to you. Great idea though! Great idea?! Really!!
        I have only one observation to point out. What is the very first thing the church does, after the feel good music, designer coffee and pastries. Hint.
        It involves some sort of container and many times is at the end of a long pole?
        If you guessed, grab the cash, you are right!
        Many of today’s churches are merely “Businesses”. No unnecessary restrictions or confrontational sermons.
        In short.. social gatherings.
        IMHO folks need to learn by actually reading the word, themselves. Not following along, with highlighter in hand.
        Used to be, I came away with a sense of obligation to my fellow man. Seems today, the only thing many are coming away with is a spring in their step, because they’re a lil light in the pocketbook. Rant off

        Liked by 2 people

      • LibertyVibe says:

        Of course it isn’t true everywhere, but I am constantly encouraged by the Treepers here on this daily thread. I have met many that love Jesus, and I am grateful for the comraderie.


  20. Sandra-VA says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sandra-VA says:

      For some reason, I cannot view videos on Twitter for the last several days.. posted this here to see if I could view and I cannot!

      Anyone else having issues?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sandra-VA says:

        Okay, it seems it is a Waterfox problem since it updated to v.53. Shame… now I have to resort to Firefox which is slower…


        • Sandra-VA says:

          Hmmm…. still had the issue. Turns out that it is TWITTER pushing back on AdBlockers… disabled adblock and videos work again. Bast*rds.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Molly says:

          Sometimes I can view, other times not — at twitter & here. I don’t know why. I CAN view this one. I love Firefox. 😉 IE and Chrome no longer work on my old PC.

          Liked by 1 person

  21. Anne says:


    Liked by 2 people

  22. Donna in Oregon says:

    I remember watching the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War” after 9/11. SMH. No one talks about that much. We helped muslims and then they killed us.

    Moral of the story?

    Liked by 5 people

  23. MakeAmericaGreat says:

    In Maria’s introduction of Farage, I was waiting to hear “…and stooge of Putin, Nigel Farage.”

    How could Maria have forgotten that key piece of information?


    Liked by 1 person

  24. Michael says:

    One little scandium J-frame could have made all the difference.
    I work with machinery.
    Machinery is logical.
    It doesn’t do PC.
    I simply cannot wrap my head about this insanity.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. JustSomeInputFromAz says:

    Interesting that the UK Authorities have detained 12 people within the last twelve hours….how did they know whom to “detain”?


  26. dilonsfo says:

    This is what the world thinks of today’s men. Latest European wear for men. Source is HeatStreet.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Monadnock says:

    OK – how many of these murder sprees do we have to observe or experience before we decide, to quote PM May, that “enough is enough?”

    I, for one, am sick to my back teeth with this determined refusal by politicians just about everywhere to come out and admit the obvious:

    “Until Islam undergoes its own version of a Reformation, it is and will forever be absolutely incompatible with a civilized, Golden-Rule-Based society.”

    They refuse to admit this because (among other reasons) they’ve taken us so far down this multicultural road that excising this cancer is now impossible without doing a number of things that a civilized, Golden-Rule-Based society will find to be abhorrent.

    Yet here we are. Islam shows no sign of a pending Reformation. Therefore, Islam and it’s practitioners MUST be removed from our societies and returned to wherever it is they came from, and going forward NO ONE from an Islamic state can be permitted to enter Western societies.

    Lots of upheaval will occur if we ever implement the paragraph. It will be ugly. It will be unfair. Innocent people will suffer inadvertently. People will be killed – on both sides of the roundup. But that’s what we see happening already now.

    Imagine you were on that bridge last night – what happened to you was ugly – it was unfair – you were innocently going about your business – you were murdered. What happened to you was hideous – but it will happen again – and again – and again. And it will keep happening until we force our governments to grow some stones and do what must be done.

    Every day I exit my home, I am rolling the dice that tragedy doesn’t visit me (and, by extension, my family). I should not be forced by my government to risk being gunned down, run down, or have my throat cut by some mentally defective muslim loser who believes my blood on his hands guarantees his sexual gluttony in the afterlife. Neither should you; and neither should anyone else in Western society.

    They MUST be removed from our midst, and sequestered back in the places where they came from, utterly separated from any means to impact our lives EVER AGAIN. If it isn’t handled by the government that foisted this mess upon us, it will eventually become necessary for us to handle the problem ourselves.

    I am not confident that our D’s and R’s will do what needs to be done. It’s time that we prepare for what’s coming.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dilonsfo says:

      Today’s civilized people depend too much on politicians (the ones a majority of people voted for). Sometimes in the course of history the people need to solve the problem the elected few refuse to deal with. After all, it is the people country.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lburg says:

      ” I should not be forced by my government to risk being gunned down, run down, or have my throat cut by some mentally defective muslim loser who believes my blood on his hands guarantees his sexual gluttony in the afterlife.”

      Nor should you be forced simply so the term ‘inclusive’ can be used to explain why the danger is there in the first place.

      Liked by 2 people

  28. Anne says:

    Brexit should also allow the UK to opt out of the European Court of Human Rights.
    Article dated 2012:

    A group of Tory MPs are demanding action by the Prime Minister over figures which show the UK loses three out of every four cases taken to the unaccountable European Court of Human Rights.

    The ten backbench Tory MPs say there is a need to ‘end rule by judges and reinstate Parliamentary democracy’. Their challenge follows a succession of sickening cases in which terrorists, murderers and sex offenders have been awarded cash after gaining judgments against the Government.

    The judgments have been blamed for allowing scores of foreign criminals and terrorists to claim they have a ‘human right’ to remain in the UK.

    Liked by 3 people

  29. rumpole2 says:

    The UK is belong to… OLD WHITE GUYS…..

    EVERYBODY else needs to shape up… or ship out!!

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Lburg says:

    ?? Could it be connected to the Dearborn FBI and ‘another city’ LEOs’ bust where the reporter was very careful, as they pulled boxes out of the duplex, to state that there was no LOCAL threat?


  31. citizen817 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Donna in Oregon says:

    I admire the Venezuelans. They want to survive. Guess Western societies need to stop eating for a week and get in the mood.

    Snipers Surround Venezuelan State TV Building as Protesters Demand Real News

    Liked by 2 people

  33. GumboPot says:

    Just an FYI, this website is starting to get a lot of pop up ads and redirects on my phone. Quite annoying.


    • KBR says:

      Lots of little attacks… I have to shut down& refresh quite often.
      I just assume somebody out there does not like what I post. Good.

      Hey you out there who dislikes my posts, got something for ya!🥓🥓🥓🥓🥓

      Liked by 1 person

  34. patternpuzzler says:

    If we are to understand the way the officials react in the face of muslim terror, we need – again – to look no further than Barack Obama. You can’t have the highest priority be to protect muslim rights AND protect your citizenry in the face of a violent scourge. Obama’s DHS and CAIR actually trained these officials, or their proxies, per an essay from Judicial Watch in December of last year:

    “This month CAIR’s Florida chapter joined forces with DHS and the State Department to conduct a special training for a delegation of French national security officials in its Tampa headquarters. The weeklong event trained the foreign officials how to “effectively challenge violent extremist individuals of all backgrounds and prevent hate crimes, while protecting civil rights and challenging profiling and discrimination,” according to a CAIR announcement. ”

    Lots more at the link:


  35. boojum says:

    Check this out. (I hope I did this right)
    BUSTED Propaganda Fake News Being Manufactured – BEHIND the SCENES! @Mr_Pinko


  36. Orygun says:

    Nigel is the man! If the UK would only put a person in power like Nigel they could start to unwind this mess.

    Liked by 5 people

  37. BMG says:

    Theresa May is part of the Globalist cabal plying her constituents with empty/senseless, ring-around and around words to discombobulate and lull the UK population. Her use of non-sensical words brings to mind, in a sense, the late great comedian Professor Irwin Corey, but his intent was to make people laugh and be happy. Theresa May is pure evil.

    Theresa May was UK Home Secretary for six years. What positive accomplishments in eradicating Islamic Terrorism can she claim? Answer-none. On the contrary, safety and security has declined.

    WAKE UP! UK People. Your leaders are screwing you to death.

    Liked by 2 people

    • waltherppk says:

      Politically correct and incompetent European leaders are criminally complicit in the rapes and murders of their own citizens, by brainwashing their people with a propaganda Big Lie about the practicality or safety of allowing immigration of “undesirables” (mostly muslims) whose alien and sociopathological, evil, criminal ideology is not compatible and is even antithetical to the values and ideology of the indigenous population. That square peg and round hole will NEVER fit no matter how much hammering is done to try to make the IMPOSSIBLE fit work.

      Liked by 6 people

  38. we300 says:

    We will know when anyone, in the UK or anywhere else, is really serious about this when the mosques are closed and when Moslem centric enclaves are emptied. How about kicking Muhammed and Huma off the public dole? How about ANYTHING as opposed to NOTHING but talk and apologies. Shut up and ACT already. Turn your spec ops guys on these communities to blend in, gather intel, and take out the leaders who flagrantly promote murder and violence. It’s not like they’re keeping their poisonous thoughts to themselves. Heck, some of the most horrific imams end up being given legitimacy by being interviewed on CNN.
    If we pointed rockets at Mecca and Medina and said: consider yourself warned. One more attack, and your holy sites are gone, that would get their attention. Granted, the latter isn’t entirely practical, but the point is, there are ways to bring these people to heel, but they all require leaders grow a set. Until then, all these leaders and pundits sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher and people keep dying.

    Liked by 4 people

    • georgiafl says:

      THIS>>>>>> “If we pointed rockets at Mecca and Medina and said: consider yourself warned. One more attack, and your holy sites are gone, that would get their attention.”

      Liked by 3 people

  39. Pam says:

    It’s too bad that Nigel Farage isn’t Great Britain’s PM. That’s the kind of leader they need. Just like POTUS, he knows what needs to be done to get the job done and like POTUS, he’s not afraid to say it. God bless him!

    Liked by 7 people

  40. Trumpire says:

    The problem is that the Muslim invaders are breeding. The Brits aren’t. So even if they stop all immigration today, they are still going to be taken over.

    London has a Muslim mayor for a reason. He has a constituency that is not leaving.

    It’s over for Great Britain unless there is an all out deportation of muslims who are currently British citizens.

    Either there is war or there is complete capitulation to Islam.

    The royals better enjoy their last days because if nothing is done now they won’t last past this current generation.

    Liked by 6 people

  41. rumpole2 says:

    I keep hearing “The vast majority of Muslims are not “terrorists”…not this… or not that etc”

    Who says?

    The very basics of Islam are totally incompatible with Western civilization.. and I hear survey after survey where a large chunk of Muslims favor Sharia law etc.

    Liked by 6 people

    • rumpole2 says:

      ” We need to work with moderate Muslims… yada, yada, yada…..”

      This is CRAP.

      “WE” need to take steps to root out Terrorists… MUSLIMS need to shape up or ship out!!


      Liked by 7 people

  42. chbailey says:

    More from Nigel Farage from today if interested. Sorry if it’s already posted, I haven’t taken the time to scroll through. LBC interview with Nigel Farrage: Nigel Farage Slams Labour London Mayor Sadiq Khan, 04 Apr. 2017

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s