It’s Not About Milo – It’s About The Existential Threat That Milo Represents…

There are trillions of dollars at stake.  Trillions.

Those who hold power will never relinquish power; a simple and timeless truth.  The current attacks against an increasingly less obscure gay man named Milo Yiannopoulos (it appears he is most known simply by “Milo”) are not about Milo Yiannopoulos per se’, anyone who has followed the construct of the swamp should see the transparency.

milo

Take this guy Milo out of the picture and replace him with any politically incorrect name you choose, and you’ll see the concerted effort to remove his influence is not about him, it’s about the underlying threat he represents.

Those who control the levers of the DC Swamp municipal system are determined to defeat the highly outlined objectives of a President Trump administration.  Milo is merely a concentric circle outlier of their real target.  The transparent objective here is to isolate, ridicule and marginalize Mr. Milo to create a door to the next circle.

Pass through the door that is Milo and proceed to the door that is Breitbart Media.  Deploy detonation devices….. open door.  Pass through the door that is Breitbart Media and proceed to the door that is Steve Bannon. Deploy same detonation devices (same approach)…. open door.   Pass through the door that is Steve Bannon and eventually they get to the desired destination, President Trump.

It would be severely intellectually dishonest not to admit this road map.

There are trillions of dollars at stake.

I don’t know much, almost nothing, about Mr. Yiannopoulos – but I do know enough to spot a political UniParty approach that is as historic and familiar as the Swamp itself.  Mr. Yiannopoulos has all the same enemies as President Trump; that cannot be coincidental.

Apparently Mr. Milo Yiannopoulos has a considerable following amid a young and vibrant counter-culture, and appears exceptionally effective at opening their eyes to the Deep State constructs who utilize Hollywood, Pop Culture and various social constructs to manipulate the psyche.

He appears flamboyant, though no more alarmingly so that the goth kids hanging out in front of the local movie theater; and if he can connect with them -and more- in a language they can appreciate and understand…. well, there’s the threat.

And when the UniParty GOPe want to utilize the useful tools of the religious right, they know just the right triggers to begin their onslaught.  Quick, to the bathroom drums…. the bizarre thing is how many people don’t realize the stagehands are the Marxist left greasing the skids to reinforce a hate narrative and steady the divisions.   Gays, like blacks, must remain on a very specific -and purposeful- political plantation.

Freedom by it’s very nature has a rather diverse set of potential allies.  The ability to reach those allies and rally them toward a standard of effectiveness is a threat to the order of those who deploy inequity and hopelessness as tools toward the more preferred strategy of ambivalence.

No, I don’t know this Milo person at all; but I do know the methods of those who seek to retain ultimate power well enough to spot when those interests rise up out of the swamp and unify in common cause.

Currently Milo is facing all the right enemies….

Cerberus

…Battle On, my good man – BATTLE ON !

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Cultural Marxism, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, media bias, Political correctness/cultural marxism, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,207 Responses to It’s Not About Milo – It’s About The Existential Threat That Milo Represents…

  1. Reality Wins says:

    Milo should write up exactly what he wanted to say at CPAC.
    Give the script to Judge Jeanine and have her deliver it.
    At the conclusion tell the GOPe that they just heard from Milo…
    whether they wanted to or not.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Howie says:

    Q…What do CPAC and Liberal College Professors have in common? A…Banning Milo.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. sunnydaze says:

    Milo tweets on Pedophilia from Sept., 2015:

    Liked by 5 people

  4. jello333 says:

    So… how do you feel about ISIS throwing gays off the top of buildings? Or if you don’t like that, how ’bout we just go back to good Old Testament type stoning. After all, the homosexuals, they be The EVIL! So… what do you say?

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Blade says:

    Oh goody, a lynching. What are we hanging him for?
    [a] Having improper thoughts
    [b] Speaking improper words
    [c] Doing improper things in private we hate
    Please let me know ASAP. P.S. How much rope should we bring?

    Like

    • Blade says:

      NOTE: this was a reply to another comment that must have been deleted.

      It was a holy roller complaining about sodomy or something.

      He sounded like he had first hand experience with sodomites or something IMHO.

      Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        Yeah, my comment wound up attached to thin air, too.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Blade says:

        Judging by the amount of deleted comments ( and all the orphan and even missing replies ) I’ll bet Sundance and his moderators have a nice, fat list of Soros troll IP addresses for future reference. 🙂

        They are so predictable and desperate now. Still mildly dangerous though. But they never met someone like Trump who refuses to lay down and surrender when they yell for his scalp and engage in Orwellian groupthink lynchings.

        Let’s all take comfort in the fact that the confessed Nazi collaborator ( oh yes its true you poor ignorant trolls, you *do* cash a check written by a confessed Nazi collaborator and just imagine if Trump was 10 years older and did what Soros did during the happiest time in his life ) is on the run, finally. Their desperation is palpable.

        Soros will soon drop dead from the agony of defeat and well-earned stress of being chased by the dark shadows of the Third Reich. His evil allies in the west like McCain and Leahy and Pelosi and Waters and Conyers and Lewis and countless other doddering old fools are also keeping just ahead of the grim reaper. We will celebrate each of them as they join their boss Satan in eternal damnation.

        You trolls think you are anonymous, but what are you gonna do when Soros and his affiliate groups’ computers are confiscated and/or hacked by anon and the IPs and even identities of all you ignorant pawns are released? Can you feel the stress mounting? Its bad enough that you get to experience President Trump tearing down your totalitarian Utopian dreams each day, but knowing that your sugar daddy is on the ropes and will be soon gone must be overwhelming! And many governments around the world are looking forward to taking a chunk out of his billions and to accomplish this, his financials will need to be examined carefully, as well as all his associations. Yep. Y’all didn’t really think he cared about your anonymity, did you? He used you!

        Liked by 2 people

        • Blade says:

          My comment is a reply to my comment, pretty sure you can see that for yourself.

          You are asking me what you are? Only you know that but its likely from the following list ….
          [1] Leftist (D)ummies
          [2] GOPe (R)INO elitists
          [3] Purist doctrinaire (C)onservatives

          My guess is that you are in [3] and possibly trolling from RedState or the RightPoopChute. Do I win a prize?

          NOTE: there’s nothing wrong with being group [3], I myself was when I was younger. But then I realized that staying ignorant in group [3] will not really matter once the Leftist enemy completes its revolution. You see, you will no longer have a church safe-space whatsoever. Just ask ex-Comms who had to wait 50-60 or even 73 years to see the inside of one again.

          And they *will* complete their revolution if they successfully isolate each of their enemies individually and rally the remainder to join in their lynching chorus. This repeats so often that it is almost ridiculous. (D)emocrats smearing their fugitive slave Clarence Thomas should come immediately to mind. Not every on of the dissidents of the Leftist revolution can be as philosophical as Ayn Rand or acceptable as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. They come in a variety of flavors. Who do we next toss overboard for violating our awesomeness, Sheriff Clarke?

          Like

      • Blade says:

        In favor of no such thing, thank you very much. That would be NAMBLA and their political arm, the (D)ummycrat party and their propaganda arm, the Enemedia.

        What’s your story though? Did you just accuse Milo, the victim of pedophiles of something?

        Have you no shame sir! <– surely this rings a bell?

        Like

    • jello333 says:

      I say we kill him… no, first we hang him, and then we kill him… but first we want to stomp him! Then after that we tattoo him…. and then we hang him. And THEN we kill him.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Blade says:

      [ I will never make the mistake of replying under a troll again! Lots of typing in a reply gets zapped when the lightning strikes. I’m just gonna repeat here under my own comment part of what I wrote because it is important … ]

      There’s nothing wrong with being purist doctrinaire (C)onservative or a holy roller. I myself was when I was younger. But then I realized that staying ignorant will not really matter once the Leftist enemy completes its revolution. You see, you will no longer have a church safe-space whatsoever. Just ask ex-Comms who had to wait 50-60 or even 73 years to see the inside of one again.

      And they *will* complete their revolution if they successfully isolate each of their enemies individually and rally the remainder to join in their lynching chorus. This repeats so often that it is almost ridiculous. (D)emocrats smearing their fugitive slave Clarence Thomas should come immediately to mind. Not every on of the dissidents of the Leftist revolution can be as philosophical as Ayn Rand or acceptable as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. They come in a variety of flavors. Who do we next toss overboard for violating our own magnificent awesomeness, Sheriff Clarke?

      Liked by 2 people

  6. seventhndr says:

    That’s quite a pedestal you have yourself on there.

    Like

  7. seventhndr says:

    I think you are as confused about the facts as Milo was about certain things that happened to him when he was 13.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Red says:

    Milo should fight this battle, he needs to set the record straight. But no way should Bannon, who now represents the White House, say a word. All of this dissension just among us is crazy. The White House has much bigger fish to fry.

    This is exactly what they want!!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Timmy-the-Ute says:

    I seen Breitbart go silent on an issue before but not this long. I guess we may have to wait till the press conference by Milo to find out what Breitbart is going to do.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. seventhndr says:

    Special thanks for treeper Parrallax for digging this up!

    I’m going to post a link and the whole article (its long, sorry) in case BB deep sixes it:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/

    by MILO21 Sep 2015
    Today, Salon gave a platform to a self-confessed pedophile to explain his urges in sympathetic terms. “I’m a Pedophile, But Not A Monster” reads the headline. It’s a long, self-pitying screed that ends with a call to be “understanding and supportive” of adults who crave sexual intimacy with children.
    Forgive me if I’m not first to start the standing ovation. In fact I’m pretty sure most people will find the existence on Salon’s website of this post both shocking and distasteful.

    The timing of Nickerson’s post, barely a week after multiple high-profile progressives rallied around progressive activist Sarah Nyberg, couldn’t be more suspect. Over the past two weeks, an alarming number of left-leaning commentators have rallied around the self-confessed transsexual pedophile and progressive activist who defended white nationalism.

    In other words, progressives who got fired up about whether green and purple was a “rapey” colour scheme were suddenly fine with discussion of incestuous pedophilia from a 22-year-old in a chat room full of teenagers. It has been a somewhat grotesque spectacle to watch.

    But these two incidents are merely just the latest in a disturbing trend of pedophilia activism on the Left, which has gone out on a limb time and time again to normalise child abuse. From the 1970s to the present day, organised pedophilia has been a recurring problem for the supposedly progressive movement.

    The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) had early support from Allen Ginsberg. In the UK, the Pedophile Information Exchange (PIE) sought acceptance on the Left by affiliating itself with the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), then run by prominent Left-wingers. Leading members of the Labour party, including Patricia Hewitt and Harriet Harman, were tarnished by their association with PIE, but many of them remain in positions of power in the Labour party.

    There are plenty of decent left-wingers who are horrified by the attempts of pedophiles to piggyback on their movement, of course. It was former Labour minister Barbara Castle who sought to draw attention to the alleged pedophile rings of the British establishment in the 1980s. And the LGBT movement made an effort to ostracise NAMBLA after it tried to join the big tent of alternative sexualities.

    slack-imgs.comThose few trendy progressives who actually have kids aren’t exactly runaway successes as parents and enthusiastically include them in drug-fuelled desert orgies or force them to swear in political broadcasts or take them to “Slut Walks.” But you get the sense that the majority of campaigners don’t have children of their own, or they’d speak rather differently.

    Pedophilia itself is of course not confined to one side of the political spectrum. But defending it does seem to be. Pro-pedophile activism continues to surface on the Left in a way that it simply doesn’t on the Right. Salon is one of the worst offenders: the left-wing website runs sympathetic features on pedophilia with alarming regularity.

    In 2012, the site ran a story entitled “Meet the Pedophiles Who Mean Well“ about a group called “Virtuous Pedophiles,” who resolve never to have sex with children. (Sarah Nyberg made reference to this group in her leaked chat logs.) In the aftermath of Ariel Castro’s initial court appearance in 2013, Salon ran an op-ed entitled “Our Approach to Pedophilia Isn’t Working,” which argued that pedophilia ought to be treated as a medical issue rather than a moral one.

    Yet, incredibly, Salon is by no means alone. In the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile scandal in the UK, the Guardian published a feature carrying the disturbing claim that there is “not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.” Even left-wing comedy websites are complaining about society’s “misunderstanding” of pedophiles, and their writers post pictures of their own children to pedophiles in “support” when the self-confessed perverts are outed.

    What’s happening here? Why are defences of pedophilia so rampant on the Left? And why are pedophiles so attracted to the progressive movement, as opposed to conservatism, libertarianism, or even anarcho-capitalism?

    The most likely answer may be difficult for left-leaning readers to accept. For decades, moral relativism has underpinned radical left-wing thought. This is particularly clear when we look at how abuses in Muslim communities are treated. When the Conservative government in Canada labeled female genital mutilation and forced marriages as “barbaric cultural practices,” they were criticised by leading Canadian leftists.

    See also: the breeziness with which feminists ignore abuses against women all across the Muslim world, and the timidity of gay rights campaigners to challenge Muslims on gay rights. Not Islamists, you understand, but mainstream Islamic society, in which simply being gay can get you killed in a dozen countries or more. Oh, and Rotherham, where moral relativism and the fear of being seen as “racist” got 1,200 white girls raped.

    In the U.S, where a left-wing administration is in charge, relativism has even seeped into the military. As was recently reported, American soldiers in Afghanistan are now being instructed to ignore the sexual abuse of boys by Afghan allies. Campaigners against religious barbarism like the UK’s National Secular Society have condemned the relativism at the heart of radical left-wing identity politics, but to no avail.

    It’s easy to see why pedophile activists would be attracted to a movement that makes excuses for practices like FGM. If the mutilation of little girls can be defended on the grounds of cultural relativism — “that’s just how they are” — what can’t be defended?

    Anarcho-capitalists and libertarians may wish to dismantle many social and legal checks on personal behaviour, but they draw a hard line around behaviour that harms or violates the rights of others. Relativists have no such rules: by definition, they don’t believe in universal rules at all.

    Horrifyingly, there are signs of a new pedophile acceptance movement forming on the Left. Just as Allen West warned, the gay rights movement is being used as a template. First comes the argument that pedophiles are just “born that way,” absolving them of any moral responsibility for their desires. Then comes the argument that pedophiles are just normal people, like the rest of us, but somehow impoverished or victimised by their own condition.

    Inevitably, our society’s current ostracisation of pedophiles will be portrayed as an injustice: an oppression from which pedophiles must be liberated, or for which they deserve our sympathy. And woe to the oppressors! Quietly, in progressive columns and academies around the world, progressives are losing their footing and sliding down that slippery slope. Publications like Salon are abetting the turpitude.

    “Acceptance” and relativism are essential tools of the partisan Left, which abandons all sense of moral consistency when one of its own is accused. The furious defence of Sarah Nyberg was redolent of the Lena Dunham scandal, in which similarly bizarre and disturbing revelations about Dunham’s relationship with her sister were defended to the hilt by media luvvies.

    You know, a bit like how the BBC covered up for Savile for all those years. Just about the only kiddy-diddlers leftists don’t stick up for are Catholic priests, for reasons best known to themselves.

    Compare this to conservative molester Josh Duggar, who can only muster support from has-beens like Mike Huckabee. The rest of the conservative movement, from National Review to Breitbart, were unequivocal in their condemnation of the Duggars. But for the hysterical defenders of Nyberg and Dunham, principle — not to mention the safety of children — can’t be allowed to come before politics.

    Aggressive public displays of virtue are where the morally deplorable hide. The trend of social justice warriors with closets full of skeletons is common enough to be a meme at this point. It might even be part of the job description. Whether by cleansing progressives of sin through virtue signalling, or simply enabling them to hide in plain sight, slacktivism provides a welcoming environment for scammers and the unsavoury, which is why progressives protect their own: they know it could be any of them next.

    The one silver lining is that such people are set to lose the support of the centre. Nyberg’s defenders hoped that the story would be contained in anti-establishment publications like Breitbart. But now it’s spreading to the mainstream, with critics of Breitbart stepping into the fray to admit that the response from the Left has been hypocritical and troubling.

    Eyebrows were raised when the media elite collectively decided to make transgenderism “the next civil rights frontier,” because although most people are deeply sympathetic to that condition, the science is very much out on treatment pathways. But this is really, as we say in England, something else.

    It is particularly crucial to protect children from pedophiles in the age of the internet, when adults have unprecedented access to minors via internet forums, chat rooms and gaming. Children get phones and tablets earlier and earlier, and nearly all kids play such social games.

    Twenty-first century pedophiles aren’t hanging around school gates with candy: they’re lurking online, like Sarah Nyberg. And parents are in some cases decades behind the times when it comes to protecting their little ones.

    Radical leftists may be planning to make pedophilia another front in their civil rights battles, but it won’t happen without a fight. Nor should it.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      That’s a great piece. I’ve had it book marked since I read it. And he is right – I am seeing pro pedophilia statements all over reddit using these exact moral relativist reasonings. And it is in academia now as well. It’s all part of the same globalist movement to destroy western civilization.

      Liked by 6 people

  11. sunnydaze says:

    Oh my God, just give it up already.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Lena Dunham and her admitted molestation of an underage sibling went largely unnoticed even after being bragged about. Milo called her out on it though when nobody else did. HBO gave her impunity based on toxic femininity. The View gave her a standing ovation.

    Milo was molested and gets top billing on Drudge for his being a victim and talking about it and he’s the monster? This makes sense?

    Liked by 2 people

    • EsotericSomethingSomething says:

      I get why many on the right would easily come out against Milo in this controversy. One of the points of confusion in some of this has been taking comments from Milo talking about older men getting with younger boys, which I guess is something only really that familiar for those that are gay that are used to talking about someone younger in the relationship as being a boy.

      I’ve actually personally known a guy that was 30 that would refer to the 25 year old guy they were with as a boy.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. EsotericSomethingSomething says:

    McMullin has all but admitted he was the one rumored to have paid $250k to investigate Milo to help take him down and there’s the “Reagan Battalion” (group associated with anti-Trump websites which just has a couple posts praising McMullin) that went after Milo.

    So this does seem like a concerted effort to misrepresent some comments Milo made about his being molested when 13 and combine them with a misrepresentation of his supportive comments regarding younger and older men being able to have relationships (since he had a relationship with a guy in his 20’s when Milo was 17).

    This especially seems the case since the majority of the criticism against Milo seems hinged on the idea that he saying it was alright for him to get with a 13 year old, when instead it was him saying he doesn’t feel he was abused by being molested when he was 13. Somewhat similar to how Richard Dawkins has commented on how he doesn’t feel traumatized by being molested as a kid.

    I think it’s kinda obvious the left got majorly pissed off by Milo appearing on Maher and actually doing well on there. Which resulted in them wanting to take down Milo in this obviously concerted attack they’d been sitting on for quite a while (they’re referencing snippets from some three hour long interview from a year ago).

    I’m a little bothered that the people at Breitbart didn’t just have someone write an article explaining some of this and instead we’ve just been left with Milo on his own just making a few comments on Facebook.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. andyocoregon says:

    I don’t quite know what to think about this Milo character, but I must say I’m inclined to support him simply on the basis he single handedly agitated many leftist college students and anarchists to the point of rioting against him. He must be doing something right.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. dalethorn says:

    I assume Milo has been sufficiently vetted by Breitbart. With that in mind, as one who has served in the Meme Wars on Facebook for several months, there were several things I didn’t “get” at first about the meme’ing and trolling of Lefties on the different social media sites. I’m still not any sort of expert, but I do understand better now the value of having guys like Milo working their end of social media, and speaking at college etc. forums. I think by now we see that Milo is relatively clean, and those who are insisting he’s not are stretching their cases thin.

    Liked by 5 people

  16. seventhndr says:

    “Milo Yiannopoulos is ok with Pedophilia (His Words)”

    That is a flat out lie and I hope you get banned for spreading fake news.

    Like

  17. Jimmy Jack says:

    Sundance, thank you for your honest words on Milo.

    I have followed Milo for quite some time. I go see him whenever I can and have been fortunate enough to talk with I’m individually. He is incredibly smart and is an icon to many young people. He is literally putting his life on the line for conservatives and religious freedom in America and he is a gay Brit. I have a Milo t shirt I wear with pride as does my bf.

    Milo’s critical role in GamerGate give him a lot of influence with the”autists” and the indie alt right kids. This is a group that is very influential in the meme wars which I think are real. We are in a period of asymmetric warfare with information.

    I’ve replied to others but will restate I think there are opportunities here we should take advantage of. Right now they are trying to smear Trump with the taint of pedophilia – and it isn’t the first timothy have tried to do this, is it? Remember, the enemy projects. Alinsky said as much.

    A while back Milo said he was told not to say anything about Pizza/Pedo Gate right now and when he said it I thought it was odd – who would have told him this? Why? (And remember, Alex Jones said something similar). There is so much referencing to this video of him discussing a party in Hollywood where he refused to identify people (wise, without evidence this is a lawsuit risk) that I have to wonder if that is not where some of this comes from. Is it possible Milo has already been deposed on this? Has he been interviewed by LEO already? Idk.

    It’s a complex issue and I am up way past my bedtime. For now I say thank you Sundance, and everyone – use this opportunity to fight back. We are under attack and the winner gets America as prize.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Regarding young people, gamerGate and how they support Milo – the kids are catching on – this came from reddit:

      I’m used to it by now. We’ve been on the receiving end of their smear tactics since Gamergate. The deep state/establishment REALLY REALLY doesn’t like new media, mostly because they can’t control it. The CIA has basically infiltrated all levels of government and there’s a network of permanent government officials in both state and federal government. They collude with corporations and billionaires and with their universal control of media (news and entertainment), they’ve been making the American people dance to their tune for decades now.
      No longer. These people need to go. They need to be tried for their crimes, locked up, and possibly executed.

      Liked by 2 people

    • cozette says:

      Team Trump confirmed that pizzagate is real during an AMA on reddit the Donald. They are working on it. Milo and others like Alex Jones were asked to stop talking about it because the chatter was interfering with the take down. The idea was to lull the pedos into a false sense of security that they’ve won.

      Like

  18. In Az says:

    I was raised in a very small town. Everyone literally knew everyone. My graduating class was only 65 people.

    When I was in the 7th grade, there was a boy in my class, and I still remember his name, who came on to our female English teacher, and I still remember her name. The English teacher was young and pretty. Her husband was away for work quite a bit. The teacher did not give the time and attention to the girls in class. The boys got the undivided attention. Even at that age I and other students could see what was going on. The English teacher openly flirted with this boy, and….. he was very mature for his age. He was always after older girls in the school also. The English teacher and this boy hung out all the time. The boy went to her home all the time, as her home was across the street from the school. The boy would do everything he could to not be seen. Of course the kids knew about it. After the Christmas break, the teacher started ignoring the boy. The English teacher was not rehired the following year.

    This was in the late 1970s. It is soooooo much worse today.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Pawz says:

    Wow.. Sign in today to check the news, hear about this whole Milo thing. First the shock – really, he said that?? Seems mighty convenient and not very Milo-like.

    Then it’s to the transcripts / videos. And surprise, surprise surprise.. again, the media is having a feeding frenzy about FAKE NEWS again. He talks about how some 13 year olds are mature enough to make sexual decisions, and then goes on to talk about why we have age of consent laws and they are a good thing… new says, ‘Milo condones pedophilia’.

    Utter. Facepalm.

    Right up there with the top Youtuber getting called a nazi. They want to destroy ANYBODY that has access to the youth – might break them out of that conditioning programs they are in!

    Liked by 2 people

  20. jello333 says:

    I just gotta say something, in case it seems we’re all ignoring the “It’s Not About Milo” part of the title. Yes, it sure seems like we’re making this “about Milo”, if you read through the comments…. but I think the DEFENSE of Milo we’re engaging in here (most of us, anyway) is actually a defense of that first door in the outer concentric circle Sundance spoke of. If we DON’T defend Milo, if we just let the wolves have him, then that first door is WIDE OPEN. And then on to Breitbart… and then Bannon… and then… Trump.

    So yes, while we may be making this mostly “about Milo” in the comment section of this post, it’s a part of our broader defense.

    (And thanks, Sundance, for opening up this conversation… I think it’s one of the more important we’ve had in awhile. And I also think it was helpful in luring in some trolls.)

    Liked by 5 people

  21. Sandra-VA says:

    I hope that Milo wll weather this storm and come out the other side stronger! This is a complete political take down and it makes me sick. I feel so bad for him… you can tell that his rape by a priest at 13 has shaped his world and he still has the scars. For the NeverTrumpers and especially McMuffin to do this just tells you how desperate they are to take down President Trump – by any means necessary.

    Right now, the new attack is being shaped… anti-semitism. Neera Tanden and her trolls are already starting it up – have seen some tweets related to the bomb hoaxes today for Jewish centers and the ddesecrated graves at a Jewish cemetery – they are trying to link this to Trump supporters. Of course, we all know that the anti-semites are part of the Left’s army. Jewish students on campuses all across the US are faced with anti-semitism all the time, and perps are invariably linked to pro-palestinian students…. so be aware.

    Good luck and stay strong, Milo!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sandra-VA says:

      forgot to say that his hit-job is 100% aboout cutting off a large amount of support for Trump via the millenial vote. Not to mention 2018. They are waging war. We have to fight them!

      Liked by 3 people

  22. jello333 says:

    Language warning…. but I think we need this right about now:

    Liked by 6 people

  23. They researched and they waited.

    The Milo clips are from over a year ago I’ve been told. So…

    They waited for the right time.
    They invited him to speak.
    It was a surprise, right? But okay, Milo will speak.
    Then they immediately attacked.
    Pure orchestration.

    This isn’t about Milo. It’s about destroying any type of threat to their little Uniparty of Hell. If ol’ Bluto was popular enough, they’d go after me. Or you. Yeah, you reading this. They’d destroy you. And it’s not about you or me, is it?

    I’m angry about this because Milo represents Bluto. Why is that? Because I’m weird. I live in California. I once went to a bunch of Grateful Dead shows – a DeadHead. I had long hair. I used to ride a Harley. I was a biker. I’m odd. I have a wicked nasty sense of humor that’s not politically correct. I don’t fit the mold. I SHOULDN’T BE A CONSERVATIVE. But I am.

    So they would have plenty of ammo to destroy me, because I’m not in their little GOPe Uniparty Box. I’m too much like Trump or Milo. A deplorable. A bad seed. A dreg of society. Awful! This is what they do. Both sides. The politics of destruction. Only this time it’s GOPe style. And the Virtue Signaling Harpies from both sides are shrieking in unison.

    Thankfully, I’m not a threat. I’m no access door to Brietbart or Bannon or Trump. But if I was….

    This whole thing feels personal to me. But that’s just me. Like I said, I’m weird.

    Liked by 10 people

  24. andi lee says:

    “If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

    ~Matthew 5:46-48

    Liked by 2 people

  25. boogywstew says:

    It’s 3:03AM Eastern Time … I just came from Breitbart and there is no sign that Milo was ever there, ever.

    Liked by 1 person

    • seventhndr says:

      Not true, at least for now. Lets wait and see.

      http://www.breitbart.com/milo/

      Liked by 3 people

      • boogywstew says:

        I clicked on your links and they are dated 2 days ago. As of 2 hours ago , he was no where in sight unless he’s buried in their archives? When you scroll down their home page … NO purple ink … nothing of Milo.

        Like

        • law4lifeblog says:

          The links are still there….he just hasn’t posted a story since the 19th. If there were “no sign that Milo was ever there, ever” then there would be no links.

          Liked by 1 person

          • skipper1961 says:

            law4lifeblog,
            This thing is troubling to me because it is being done so brazenly. It’s like they are setting Milo up for something.I have been following Mr. Yiannopoulis for several years, finding him to be courageously, independently, exceptional. His refusal to observe political correctness, with what Gavin McGuiness aptly noted as “hate facts”, is predictably toxic to the sjws, who claim to be the “protectors” of several of demographics that Milo “fits into”. He is an existential threat to the status quo. I have personally offered to assist him with any personal security efforts I can, whenever he is in the Central Florida area. I would sign any petition offered to me, to arrange for his citizenship.

            Like

    • NotSure says:

      All the articles by Milo are still available here-

      http://www.breitbart.com/author/milo-yiannopoulos/

      Like

    • ethicall says:

      This attack on Milo is exactly about getting to Bannon and Trump. I read the transcript of the show in question, don’t know if it was edited, but he comes right out and says something like “Don’t think I am advocating pedophilia because I certainly am not, if you think I am then you don’t know the definition of pedophilia,” He was saying, however, that in his case as at 13 or 17 year old (unclear which age he was connecting to the act) having sex with a man 24 to 29 years old was beneficial to him in some way. Made him feel like he had someone to feel at ease with. He felt it was a good thing in his case, I disagree with him, but he has a right to argue that. I think he was taken advantage of if not statutorily raped and being groomed for sex. In the worst case he said that some boys between 13 and 17 years old can choose to have sex with a man 24 to 29 years old. (pederasty and sick on the man’s part) If he had said this about a girl almost no one on the left would be upset. Now we learn that Milo was molested as a child, something that happens to a lot of homosexuals. He says himself that he is messed up in that area. That said, Milo is incredibly intelligent, knowledgeable about history, politics, the culture, he is articulate, funny (when he’s not being gross) and witty. His is a voice that the young and old, are listening to and learning from because he understands the threat we face today from the radical left, political correctness (fascism) and Islam. In no way do I think he was advocating pedophilia but his view on across the board pederasty is unclear. However, the left and been advocating pedophilia for years. I was debating the editor of a homosexual advocacy book entitled “One Teenager in Ten” around 1998? and asked her why she included stories in the book of homosexuals fondly remembering having sex as children with adults. Why would she advocate pedophilia? She said “Well, I don’t know what you mean by pedophilia but I know lots of people including heterosexuals who are in to intergenerational sex.” There it is folks, the new word, coined by the left, for pedophilia.

      Liked by 3 people

  26. rumpole2 says:

    The good news is.. apparently Pedophilia is “not so bad” and so there wont now be so much hysteria about #pizzagate conspiracy theories…. No?

    Liked by 5 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      It needs to be dialed back to just the level that makes the Podesta brothers check plane flights.

      Liked by 3 people

    • sundance says:

      rumpole2, you are way out of line.

      Liked by 10 people

    • boogywstew says:

      If Milo lost his virginity at age 13 to an older man that is considered rape and Milo is the victim of sexual abuse … making him a real victim. Carrying on as spectacularly well as he has is the mark of a hero. You compare a rape victim, Milo, to the rapists in another crime? Do you suggest an honor killing of Milo because he was raped? Gee … what religion advocates something as barbarically stupid as that?

      Liked by 9 people

      • TJ says:

        The nevertrumper neocons(former marxists) have no base without cookie-cutter christians playing identity politics, as Merkel’s(former marxist) CDU(christian democratic union) does.

        “I’m a Christian sooo…”
        “I’m a Feminist sooo…”
        “I’m an Environmentalist sooo…”

        I’m an American, so what?

        “As the Creator has made no two faces alike, so no two minds, and probably no two creeds.” –Thomas Jefferson to Timothy Pickering, 1821. ME 15:324

        “Is uniformity of opinion desirable? No more than of face and stature.” –Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XVII, 1782. ME 2:223

        “It is a singular anxiety which some people have that we should all think alike. Would the world be more beautiful were all our faces alike? were our tempers, our talents, our tastes, our forms, our wishes, aversions and pursuits cast exactly in the same mould? If no varieties existed in the animal, vegetable or mineral creation, but all moved strictly uniform, catholic and orthodox, what a world of physical and moral monotony would it be!” –Thomas Jefferson to Charles Thomson, 1817. FE 10:76

        “I have never dreamed that all opposition was to cease. The clergy, who have missed their union with the State, the Anglomen, who have missed their union with England, and the political adventurers, who have lost the chance of swindling and plunder in the waste of public money, will never cease to bawl on the breaking up of their sanctuary.” –Thomas Jefferson to Gideon Granger, 1801. ME 10:259

        Like

      • uvaldegirl says:

        He described his way of dealing with it as akin to gallows humor. We should not forget that Milo is British and the humor is more self-deprecating and cutting.

        Liked by 2 people

    • cali says:

      @rumpole2: You are despicable! I have a question for you: Before there was a ‘Milo’ the leftist Salon approved of pedophilia in the articles they posted on their website expressing their support. Now – Milo caused the agenda to change and all supporting pedophilia articles disappeared from the archive of Salon. What say you?
      Hysteria about Pizzagate? Really? Just yesterday – the UK admitted that one of their leading ministers who is now deceased was a pedophile that raped more than 80 children while being covered up by law enforcement similar to that of Savile – the BBC owner. This politician was known among some of our own in the state department.
      Pizzagate is no joke and while Sundance chooses ‘battles’ wisely it does not mean pedophilia is a myth. I leave you with that: Even if the propaganda media continues their interference poo-pooing these actions, lying to cover-up or for someone like the Podesta Brothers it may not get into the public domain as it should. It also does not mean it’s a lie. Shame on you thinking it is a joke! This battle may or may not make it into the public domain.

      Liked by 2 people

  27. grlangworth says:

    Milo should never stop being fearless. CPAC and Simon & Schuster be damned.

    Liked by 11 people

  28. Sundance, you’re a genius at analyzing battle strategies. Thank you and God bless you!

    Liked by 3 people

  29. “Those who control the levers of the DC Swamp municipal system are determined to defeat the highly outlined objectives of a President Trump administration. Milo is merely a concentric circle outlier of their real target.”

    Right on Sundance.

    Where was the Uniparty’s faux outrage back in 2000? Oh that’s right, Bill Clinton was president.

    “The American Civil Liberties Union has asked a judge to dismiss what it calls an “unconstitutional” lawsuit against a national pedophile organization being sued in a wrongful death case after two of the group’s members brutally raped and murdered a 10-year-old boy.”

    http://www.wnd.com/2000/12/4648/

    Liked by 6 people

  30. Jeff says:

    Live by ID POLITICS …DIE BY ID POLITICS !

    IF this Milo person were a heterosexual male would he have achieved the same support by the perceived right ?

    The BLOB ( uniparty & GLOBALISTS combined efforts to stop Trump ) …The BLOB will do anything to stop Trump and the return of America . Ironic that the BLOB used the PEDOPHILE LETTER to brand Milo with to have the perceived right reject on of their “rising stars ” in the CULTURAL MARXIST WAR THAT IS RAGING !!

    Sundance is 100% correct that it matters more the METHODOLOGY used by the BLOB than the WHO they used it on !

    President Trump is THE KUNG FU MASTER of this dangerous game of SURVIVOR AMERICAN ISLAND . We are ” GRASSHOPPER or ” Danielson ” to Mr Miyagi … President Trump ..

    Potus is fighting on all fronts and the one WE can help him with the most is the current meme of FAKE NEWS ! and VERY FAKE NEWS .

    ” WAX ON …WAX OFF ” our job is to continue to push that to every liberal or lunatic lefty we encounter ..FAKE NEWS the same as they ALINSKY us with RACIST RACIST RACIST to anything and everything .

    Shove it right back in the UGLY FACE OF CULTURAL MARXISTS https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/02/13/shoving-alinskys-rules-for-radicals-right-back-in-the-lefts-ugly-face-n2284892

    11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside… every positive has its negative.” ~ tactic from RULES FOR RADICALS

    Wax away !! make FAKE NEWS the first words out of your mouth or in a post to any liberal you encounter . Its time WE PLAY THE GAME OF SURVIVOR AMERICAN ALINSKY ISLAND TOO !!

    Before any investigation or REAL NEWS can be shown to the public on #pizzagate or DEEP STATE …WE HAVE TO DIMINISH AND MARGINALIZE the alphabet media propaganda outlets in the SIMPLE MINDS OF INSANE LIBERALS .

    EXAMPLE …..April 15th 2009 all over America people gathered in a grassroots protest the ENEMEDIA gave the name of …TEA PARTY

    The cultural Marxists at MOVE ON and OFA gave them the name of TEA BAGGERS

    The ” TEA PARTY ” numbers grew quickly and organically up to the moment the CULRURAL MARXIST branded them TEA BAGGERS . VERY VERY EFFECTIVE ,meme

    Suddenly the TEA PEOPLE declared themselves only in SUPPORT of the TEA PARTY . THAT ..THEY themselves were not actually a member . They splintered and went in to hiding .

    The same thing works in reverse . MAKE A LIBERAL …yes even an INSANE LIBERAL begin to QUESTION their beloved CNN and alphabet media paid liars ….

    push the negative hard …WAX ON …WAX OFF ..FAKE NEWS FUC$ OFF …FAKE NEWS …FUC$ OFF …FAKE NEWS …..

    .Myagi Trump had you practice these techniques for a REASON …THE WAR IS RAGING ….now join the FIGHT !!

    BEAT THE BLOB at their own game with their own tactics

    Liked by 2 people

    • dbethd says:

      “push the negative hard …WAX ON …WAX OFF ..FAKE NEWS FUC$ OFF …FAKE NEWS …FUC$ OFF …FAKE NEWS …..”

      A lot of people have quickly forgotten again. Thanks for the reminder for all.

      Like

  31. trumpsbamagirl says:

    My favorite Milo video- he destroys Terry Moran

    Liked by 3 people

  32. mg says:

    meelo – makes me sick to my stomach. A perverted, twisted man seeking fame. Disgusting. Reminds me of democrats.

    Like

  33. jeans2nd says:

    You are incorrect, BlackCompany.

    Milo was raped as a thirteen year old by an older man.

    Milo chose to laugh at himself and his (Milo’s) own situation in life.

    Milo just took it a bit too far in explaining his (Milo’s) own success rather than spending his life in a self-pity party.

    As a result, our holier-than-thou Betters are now raping Milo again to take down Breitbart, Bannon, and Pres Trump.

    Most people cannot understand that. Apparently, neither do you.

    Liked by 11 people

  34. Bob Thoms says:

    Milo has not “advocated for pederasty”; in fact, just the opposite.

    I respectfully suggest educate yourself about the subject, view the video produced by CTH’s Sentinel – above inside this thread.

    Liked by 4 people

  35. Ficklefinger says:

    This is about destroying Breitbart and Steve Bannon and then, Trump himself. They got Flynn. They will keep working on others inside. Their real problem is going to be what Jeff Sessions is going to do to them. That is why they are desperately attacking Trump, day after day. A whole bunch of DC insiders are going to prison and they know it.

    Liked by 8 people

    • joshua says:

      then Sessions should GET ON WITH IT NOW.

      Like

      • cozette says:

        Sessions is getting on with it. There have been raids of pedophile rings going on across the country. Trump signed an EO targeting international drug and human trafficking networks. There have been recent outings of networks in Haiti, Norway and now a British ex PM. Word on reddit the Donald is that Flynn is now assigned to the take down of the international networks. Patience.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Breitbart is now destroying itself by blocking all things Milo now. I will NOT visit BB again until they reverse course. I would respectfully ask all others here to do the same.

      Like

      • Mike says:

        Again, and this has been posted multiple times:

        http://www.breitbart.com/author/milo-yiannopoulos/
        His archive is right here. One need only click on any article to see that they are still active. BB is NOT “blocking all things Milo now.”

        Whether it’s concern trolling or hysterical ignorance, this false information that keeps getting re-churned is getting beyond old mighty fast.

        Like

        • Funny you say that – EVERY comment I posted this morning on BB that referenced Milo has been removed by the mods. Duh!!! Archives are archives – real time is real time.

          Like

          • Challenge – go to BB and post a comment about Milo – see how long it stays up. I will wait for your apology!

            Like

            • Mike says:

              First you said “Breitbart is now destroying itself by blocking all things Milo now.” I’m damn sure that the articles he wrote fall into that category. Then you changed the goalposts from “all things Milo” to “comments.”

              You just keep sitting there, waiting my apology. I suggest you stock up on food and water.

              Like

              • All I know is that comments about Milo were removed and not only mine. The interview with the BB editor includes the statement that he believes this is a hit piece that they sat on until the invite to CPAC. We shall see.

                Like

          • Mike says:

            I don’t know what’s going on with your account, but I found this right now. It certainly references Milo: I assume a half hour ago to be “real time,” considering it was posted after you posted what I am replying to.now.

            “Tim Smith • 30 minutes ago
            Breitbart was advocating free speech all the time in their articles about Milo, but now that it concerns the debate about the age of consensual sex they would sack him because they can’t handle what he says? Stupid and hypocritical.”

            http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/02/19/milo-left-silence-us-because-they-know-they-cant-beat-us/#comment-3167696910

            Like

            • Perhaps it was because it was on a thread that did not pertain to Milo specifically. It that is the case, then I will be pleased to be proved wrong.

              Like

              • Mike says:

                What part of “MILO: The Left Tries to Silence The Right Because They Know They Can’t Beat Us” doesn’t “pertain to Milo specifically?”.

                Look, I really don’t want to fight with you. You seem to be trying to dig to the truth. I am having problems discerning between concern trolls, deliberately posting false information and people who are confused and upset by all this. I admit I am a bit testy right now over this. I’m upset too. So tired of these dishonest attacks from fake news and the Uni-Party.

                Please, try to be accurate and clear going forward. TY.

                Like

                • Same here – not fighting with you and I have been known for jumping on something without waiting to clarify – I am far from the most patient person out there. My comments on a BB thread that did not pertain in any way to Milo were removed and others were commenting that their comments were also removed – perhaps that is why. No problem – I will work on being more patient and finding out all the details before I post. Thanks.

                  Liked by 1 person

      • cozette says:

        Boycotting Breitbart if what the globalists WANT you to do. Please don’t fall for it. The Left wants to divide and thereby conquer Trump supporters. Please don’t let them succeed. Support Milo. Support Breitbart. Subscribe to reddit the Donald which is under attack too because it is a huge and potent ally of Team Trump.

        Liked by 1 person

        • There are just sooooo very many shytes there turning on Milo and/or our President, not to mention the godawful trolls!!!! I was there for a bit this morning and it is 1000% worse than it ever was – I get to my max blocks far too quickly!!! Infowars is also under attack – just lost about $3 million worth of advertising!

          Like

    • Bob Thoms says:

      Breitbart will destroy itself if it gives Milo the boot, or otherwise shuns him.

      Andrew Breitbart would defend Milo on these trumped up allegations…………so would Bannon.

      Let the Breitbart people walk……….there are plenty of replacements will to do the job.

      Liked by 2 people

  36. Leslie Ingersoll says:

    I for one, love MILO!❤
    He is on the front line and is taking arrows from all sides. Regardless of what the reporters want to tell you about him, he is a joyfull voice of counter culture, and he makes me laugh! Laughter is the best way to combat here. The left is so entrenched, it really is a battle for the hearts and minds of OUR CHILDREN! He is a breath of fresh air and I for one support his efforts to inject a different view. I have listened to almost all of his pod casts and he is connecting with the college kids who have no voice against the bitter leftist agenda. Rock on Milo, keep your head up and never let them destroy you or your message❤

    Liked by 5 people

  37. This is what I discovered yesterday by listening to THE RECORDING that started all this. It was a podcast in which Milo used the word “pedophilia”. He admitted Father Michael had sex w/ him when he was 13 … and that he is against pedophilia which HE defined as “sex with a child” meaning NOT an adolescent. THE HORROR! That’s what got him in trouble!
    But when I looked up the legal definition of pedophilia, it turns out Milo is right!
    Pedophilia is when an adult acts out sexual feelings for a CHILD. Legally a CHILD is not an ADOLESCENT! A child becomes an adolescent legally at age 12 for a girl and age 14 for a boy!

    As a result of this podcast, people are up in arms that Milo is in favor of pedophilia …. but he distinctly said he is NOT! He also wrote on his Facebook page yesterday that sex with minors is illegal and he would never promote anything illegal.

    So what’s really all the hubbub, Bub?

    Liked by 12 people

    • Rafael says:

      Milo doesn’t defend even sex with young adolescents. He says age of consent should stay where they are (meaning 16, because he is British). He does talk like he could do it at 13. But that’s a coping mechanism because he was the victim.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Moral? That word was never used one way or another in the podcast and the podcast is what CPAC and Simon&Schuster are basing their actions on. They are assuming that Milo thinks pedophilia is OK. But in that podcast he said it is NOT OK.

      Pedophilia is sex with a child, not with a teenager. Legally pedophilia is sex with a girl 11 or younger or sex with a boy 13 or younger. And Milo said he would never condone pedophilia or sex with a minor (minor is under 16 in England). He specifically said he would never condone anything illegal – so no sex with a minor under 18 in the U.S.

      Look, I couldn’t believe CPAC invited him as keynote speaker to begin with! What a stupid idea! But they uninvited him for saying something he didn’t say.

      Like

  38. joshua says:

    grow up and do research prior to spouting off. Milo is being gaslighted to the public to destroy Trump….that is ALL.

    Like

  39. Killdozer says:

    What about ManMilo taking a bloodbath (on video) like Jimmy Comet that’s pretty creep ,if Bannon goes out on a limb and then more creep show pops up …

    Like

  40. blognificentbee says:

    They are coming for Bannon, then they are coming for POTUS. This is just the beginning of what the Uniparty is planning, buckle up. Don’t let them divide us.

    Liked by 7 people

  41. dbethd says:

    What Milo does in his relationships is his business. I do not agree with people digging and twisting for one scandalous, misunderstood statement from Milo. We all have bones in our closet.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. tyshab says:

    Everyone take a breath, this is what those who released this want. He says he is not in support of pedophilia. As brutally honest as he is about everything else I will take him at his word until his ACTIONS suggest otherwise. We have seen over and over how the left twist and distort both video and text to suit THEIR narrative.Up until now Milo’s ACTIONS do not support the accusation he is a supporter of pedophilia. In fact his ACTIONS suggest otherwise. You do not have to go see him, buy his materials or support him if he offends you, nor do you need to pile on. Stop judging him without more proof than some words on a recording. I call my husband and nephews ‘my boys’ sometimes. The term boys is used differently in different contexts with different audiences. Leave it to God to sort out.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. Bob Thoms says:

    Milo is not a pederast. He has said so many many times. He has said he believes in the consent laws.

    Seems you have a moral problem with homosexuality. I get it. But that viewpoint isn’t a license to misrepresent.

    Liked by 3 people

    • coltlending says:

      Well said. Spot on.

      Even where the legal age of consent is relatively high, very few young people are wired, at that age, with an understanding of when they are being used or manipulated.

      No person with a moral compass, gay or otherwise, would take advantage of a young person in the way Milo was. Milo said he was the aggressor, but come on, at that age most kids or adolecents know when they are playing with fite.

      Milo is a remarkable intellect and had been a great asset in the fight against the Left.

      But, there is no way I can abide with what he clearly stated in the video. It wasn’t like he said it eons ago.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Your comment is emotional and you are mixing together several issues. Milo does not advocate sex with boys under the age of consent. He does say that it can be a good experience ( which most believe is his way of coping with what was done to him). In other times and in other cultures the idea of an older woman giving a young man his first experience is prevalent. In South Seas cultures the reverse is also true. Milo was being philosophical and not proposing that be the custom or the law of the land.

      When he talks about pedophilia he is and has been consistently strongly against the act and supports the need for age of consent laws to protect young people who may not be ready for or understand what they are consenting to.

      Where people get confused is that homosexuals refer to the younger/less experienced partner as a boy be they 18 or 25. Those are the relationships Milo was referring to. In the UK the age of consent is 16 and Milo was referencing a relationship he had at 17y with a man in his mid 20’s and was communicating on a homosexual forum where he would have expected that to be understood.

      I don’t find homosexuality a comfortable topic or thought pattern but I believe the freedom to be a homosexual is one of the freedoms I must support. I believe in marriage is a heterosexual commitment although same sex commitments are valid. Children are best raised in families with a mother & father but exceptions exist. Interestingly Milo’s writings confirm he shares those ideas on marriage & children.

      Like

  44. dbethd says:

    For articles WRITTEN BY Milo see this link:
    http://www.breitbart.com/author/milo-yiannopoulos/
    For just articles with Milo as the subject:
    http://www.breitbart.com/milo

    Like

  45. Mike says:

    In possibly related news:
    FRAUDS: Salon Removes Old Articles That Tried to Justify Pedophilia
    BY ETHAN RALPH · PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 20, 2017 · UPDATED FEBRUARY 20,

    http://theralphretort.com/salon-removes-old-articles-tried-justify-pedophilia-2020017/

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mike says:

      Adding: The reason I said “doubtful” is that Milo is on record condemning pedophilia repeatedly. Salon, on the other hand is and has put pedophilia in a positive and compassionate light.

      If I’m mistaken, and I don’t think I am, Milo condoning pedophilia, was the original line of attack.

      == > Pedophilia, < == IMO is the issue, not the other stuff.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s