President Trump Supreme Court Nomination – 8:00pm Event Live Stream…




President Donald Trump is scheduled to introduce and announce his nominee for the open seat on the Supreme Court of the United States.  The event is scheduled for 8:00pm

White House Live Stream LinkAlternate Live Stream #1Alternate Live Stream #2



This entry was posted in media bias, President Trump, Supreme Court, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

655 Responses to President Trump Supreme Court Nomination – 8:00pm Event Live Stream…

  1. dizzymissl says:

    Liked by 7 people

    • TheOldBear says:

      Trump is so brilliant! Gorsuch is a guy they supported and now they have to deal with their bold statement that they will block any Trump nomination, no mater what. So now they will have to block and look hypocritical and foolish but will still stick to their guns since they are crazed liberals. So the only corse of action will be for the Turtle 🐢 to now put in place the nuclear option for SCOTUS confirmations…Bam ! Once that is done it will be easier to get future justices confirmed down the road instead of it being harder as the MSM is trying to portray. So we should have at least two more for Trump after Gorsuch this term. Checkmate Demo Libtards.

      Liked by 8 people

  2. NHVoter says:

    Liked by 8 people

  3. Kaco says:

    Transgender rights will soon be before the Supreme Court. Apparently, Judge Gorsuch has sided favorable in a transgender case and approves of gender identity issues. My main concern is children and gender identity/transgender. I saw Sundance posted this is a Kennedy replacement pick but it was described by President Trump as a Scalia replacement pick. Transgender cases will be brought before the court before Kennedy retires, I’m sure.


  4. Martin says:

    Liked by 5 people

  5. Bl says:

    Just looking at the people that Trump surrounds himself with and their families is inspiring. Who wouldn’t prefer them over Madonna, Lena Dunham or other leftist degenerates?

    Liked by 19 people

  6. From the head clown!

    Liked by 4 people

  7. MfM says:

    Boo boo, Fauxcahotas doesn’t like him and has already said she won’t vote for him.

    Liked by 6 people

  8. Kaco says:

    Just want to add, being Episcopalian is no small comfort, they ordain gay pastors.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. NHVoter says:

    Liked by 7 people

    • Martin says:

      So that’s 58. Need two more.

      Liked by 6 people

    • WeThePeople2016 says:

      I think they know they are destroying their Party with all of these protests and ridiculous stunts during the Cabinet Hearings. Some of these Dems are up for re-election in 2018 and are concerned that the Party is imploding, which it is.

      Liked by 14 people

    • TheTorch says:

      Well if that is true.

      Then we are at 58, 2 more Dems to peel off.

      What could be happening here is that the Dems don’t want him on the Court, but they are terrified of the nuclear option being used to ram it through.

      I other wards if they go full bore insanity on this, they will lose a ton of political capital and the nuclear option used. Which means any future Supreme Court picks during Trump Presidency will only require 51 not 60, which would be absolute Armageddon for the Dems. This way at least from their point of view, they get to fight another day.

      As Sundance has pointed out this could well be to replace Kennedy. When Kennedy leaves the court, Trump gets to pick a Scalia judge. Don’t think the Dems don’t know this – which is why they may leave their powder dry for the big one, otherwise they are toast.

      Liked by 6 people

    • p'odwats says:

      If you go behind the scenes the Democrats are scared out of their minds about the midterm elections next year. Usually the party in power and holding the White House loses seats. I think the opposite will happen and that the Republicans will gain seats, maybe even have another landslide as happened in 2010 and 2014. Not every Democrat in congress is as clueless and dumb like Pelosi and Schumer when it comes to reading the political tea leaves. The bottom line is what scares the Democrats, and for that matter the Republican establishment, is that Trump will establish a trust and bond with working class Americans with his economic agenda. The globalist cabal is afraid of losing its power and influence, and that’s why they’re fighting like mad to stop the president.

      Liked by 8 people

  10. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

  11. NHVoter says:

    Liked by 6 people

  12. webgirlpdx says:

    Ignoring all the dirty protesters, Senatorial/Congressional obstructionists, Campaign ugliness et. al. this is truly the day President Trump saves our Republic.

    Liked by 14 people

  13. suejeanne1 says:

    President Trump has some kind of a knack – Jeff Sessions, Mike Pence and Neil Gorsuch are three wonderful examples that reflect well on President Trump – God bless all of you!

    Liked by 12 people

  14. ConstitutionMan says:

    A quick read of the progressive enemy one notes a plurality in favor of a filibuster that matches the time they believe Merrick Garland was opposed by the Republicans in the Senate. This means according to them a fillibuster lasting until June at a minimum.

    The progressives are truly an enemy of our great Country and its Constitution.

    We are just now awakening to the fact we face a civil war whereupon the future of our great nation is at stake and we must maintain and increase our support for President Trump to ensure the salvation of our great Nation and its constitutional Republic.

    Gorsuch is a great nominee who will serve our Country and its Citizens with honor, integrity, and as a servant to our great Constitution.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. truthandjustice says:

    According to a R pundit (can’t remember name), whose political predictions have been right so far, says he predicts he’ll be confirmed in the end, but not after much fighting, etc. Judge Napolitano said Schumer & crew’s short term goal is to stall until after April so he won’t be able to sit on important cases coming up then. Probably why Pres. Trump wants it done by April 1 (I think).
    I think he said one was whether schools had to redo bathrooms for the transgenders. If he isn’t, the lower courts win who say they must. The opposite is likely if he is in then.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Wendy says:

      It’s just insane to require schools to do that! Besides constitution can you imagine how much it will cost to redo all the bathrooms? That money should be spended on improving our children’s education! It’s called common sense!

      Liked by 5 people

      • Aparition42 says:

        Home school. It’s the only way to be sure. If you can’t make that happen, look long and hard for a good private church school, but even those have their issues. The college courses teachers are required to survive for their state licensing are the most intolerant, divisive liberal indoctrination you can imagine and then some. Very few manage to make it through the full degree plan unscathed.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Kaco says:

          Perhaps those possible future school vouchers can be used for religious dissent against public schools. A lot of people cannot take time off work to homeschool, let alone pay for private school when the majority of property taxes are going to public schools.


    • Kaco says:

      Then they should nuclear option if it gets too close and they can’t delay the case.


  16. This is graham!

    Liked by 3 people

  17. webgirlpdx says:

    By the way, The President looked very handsome tonight 🙂

    Liked by 9 people

  18. andi lee says:

    Thank You, Heavenly Father!

    Congratulations! To The Honorable Justice Gorsuch & Mrs. Gorsuch!

    ~God’s Will Be Done, Amen!

    Thank YOU President Trump!

    Liked by 11 people

  19. Kaco says:

    It would be nice to know his views on immigration for the upcoming battles, maybe even for birthright citizenship for those born of foreign nationals.

    Liked by 4 people

  20. TheTorch says:

    Trump is a frigging Genius.

    He has united the GOP on this. He is splitting some of the Red State Dems off and to top it off, even the dreaded Never Trumpers are stunned.

    LOL 🙂

    Meanwhile in La La land, the media is melting down and the snowflakes are getting confused at what they are supposed to be protesting…

    BTW – rumors possibly this week that Trump may announce withdraw from the Paris Climate Treaty… get ready for an EPIC snowflake meltdown.

    He is flooding the zone with so much stuff, they can’t compute anything. We are only at Week 2.

    4 years of this! Good grief, the snow flakes will be emigrating to North Korea.

    Liked by 21 people

  21. fedback says:

    Another great win for President Trump
    Another campaign promise kept
    Great evening

    Liked by 8 people

  22. dizzymissl says:

    Liked by 10 people

  23. rumpole2 says:

    Why Can’t the Senate pass a “Cut the Crap” amendment to senate rules.

    Limit the questioning and whining about a nominee and take a vote within 2 days?

    Liked by 9 people

  24. Pam says:

    Here is Cruz’s interview with Tucker.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. JoD says:

    All this chit-chat about Judge Gorsuch and we missed the Nancy Pelosi Town Hall on CNN………….Thank you Judge Gorsuch!

    Liked by 8 people

    • Proud Texan says:

      I was flipping thru MSNBC and CNN looking for splodey heads and caught a part of her town hall. I was intrigued by a South Texas veterinarian who has been threatened by illegals passing thru his ranch, his wife threatened at her front and back door by same, found a rape tree 300 yards from their front door and have found several dead illegals on their ranch. He was calmly telling his story and Tapper stopped him to allow Pelosi to answer his questions. “Will you support Trumps wall and help stop illegal immigration? Will you support doing away with sanctuary cities?” She felt bad (fake) about their troubles and explained why they have sanctuary cities.
      The next guest was the Texas lady whose son was butchered by an illegal in Houston area. She asked Pelosi if Pelosi could choose which child or grandchild to sacrifice so an illegal could have a safe life in her sanctuary city. Pelosi offered her prayers and didn’t want anyone else to suffer thru that. No reaction from the audience.
      Then, a “dreamer” from El Paso explained how his anchor baby sister was finally able to sponsor their parents for citizenship, but if DACA is overturned he would have to go back to Mexico, lose his education and job and he was scared. The f’ing crowd went crazy in supporting him. My wife thought I was going to have a stroke when I saw that.
      We have much work to do!!! Sorry for the rant.

      Liked by 3 people

  26. Martin says:

    Liked by 6 people

  27. George says:

    Trump: “I am a man of my word, I do what I Say, something the American people have been waiting for a very long time.

    Liked by 14 people

  28. Martin says:

    Liked by 3 people

  29. Martin says:

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Bull Durham says:

    The Conservatives could never have accomplished what DJT has done. They have what they dreamed of but could never achieve.

    I hope a few of them will break out of their ideological straightjacket and get to work helping DJT put his government together now.

    45 delivered. Time to step up and deliver for the People.

    Liked by 14 people

  31. Martin says:

    Liked by 5 people

  32. NHVoter says:

    Liked by 3 people

  33. NJF says:

    Hubby put on CNN earlier and a couple of pundits made an interesting point, maybe they read CTH.

    They were arguing that the senate should “go along” with this pick, rather then allowing McTurtle to invoke the nuclear option. Don’t set the prescident.

    Then on Tucker some nutjob congressman stated “based on the popular vote, he should have to get 68 votes.”

    Tucker laughed in his face and asked, “so now there’s a degree of winning?”

    Liked by 4 people

  34. NJF says:

    Love it.

    Liked by 5 people

  35. NJF says:


    The vitriolic slander still stuns me sometimes.

    Liked by 2 people

    • LBB says:

      This seems to be part of their strategy. Doesn’t have to be exactly true or not, but be first to taint public opinion.

      Liked by 3 people

    • WSB says:

      ‘If I am not mistaken, Gorsuch came out against parapelegic Leukemia-ridden French speaking midgets…I think.”


      Liked by 1 person

    • WSB says:

      We put our German Shepherd to sleep after her disease became too debilitating.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sandra says:

      She’s addressing her ignorant Dem voters who never fact check anything.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sandra says:

        This is what b-face Pelosi thinks is so egregious:

        We sympathize with Luke’s family and do not question the enormous burdens they face. Our job, however, is to apply the law as Congress has written it and the Supreme Court has interpreted it. Though IDEA is certainly evidence that Congress intends that States, acting through local school districts, provide assistance to disabled students and their families, the assistance that IDEA mandates is limited in scope. The Act does not require that States do whatever is necessary to ensure that all students achieve a particular standardized level of ability and knowledge. Rather, it much more modestly calls for the creation of individualized programs reasonably calculated to enable the student to make some progress towards the goals within that program. The findings of every factfinder in this case indicate that this standard has been met here. For this reason, we are constrained to reverse the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

        Further info below. This all came about because the parents of an autistic kid weren’t happy with his progress at a public school so they enrolled him at an expensive private school, then demanded that the school system reimburse them because the school system supposedly failed the kid.

        Liked by 2 people

  36. rf121 says:

    Oh no. Geraldo likes him. Something’s not right here.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. Sandra says:

    Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. It looks like the autism case Nancy Pelosi so carelessly summarizes is this one:

    The parents of an autistic child, Luke, weren’t happy with the public school he was attending even though he was getting special treatment at that school. They decided to enroll him in a private boarding school, a very expensive one in Boston. Then they wanted the Colorado public school system to reimburse them. Apparently Gorsuch sided against them, as did other judges. What’s even more annoying is that another family in Colorado is trying to do the same thing with their autistic kid, trying to get reimbursement for expensive private school that they chose to put their kid in when they felt the public school wasn’t good enough..

    Here’s a good line from the court decision:

    While we are sympathetic to Luke’s parents’ desire to see their child thrive, the difficulty with their argument is that Congress did not provide in IDEA a guarantee of self-sufficiency for all disabled persons, and the most authoritative arbiter of congressional intent has already reached this conclusion. I guess Nancy Pelosi thinks that public schools should be expert at handling the widest range of disabilities. She’s a pig.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s