Another Promise Fulfilled – President Trump’s Temporary Halt on Refugee Influx and Seven Nation Visa Suspension…

In yesterday’s executive action (full script not yet released) President Trump suspended the visa travel program with Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days in order to assess the screening process for immigrants, and visitors.

Additionally, as reported by Reuters, President Trump put a four-month hold on the State Department refugee program, while the vetting process is reviewed and security practices put into place to enhance the screening process.

trump-mattis-4

The reaction from the left-wing open-border globalists was entirely predictable.  However, even though their response was predictable, it is still incredible to see the complete lack of cogent understanding within their arguments.   This quote from CAIR is a case study in abject moonbattery:

(Reuters) […]  The order seeks to prioritize refugees fleeing religious persecution, a move Trump separately said was aimed at helping Christians in Syria. That led some legal experts to question whether the order was constitutional.

One group said it would announce a court challenge on Monday. The Council on American-Islamic Relations [CAIR] said the order targets Muslims because of their faith, contravening the U.S. Constitutional right to freedom of religion.

“President Trump has cloaked what is a discriminatory ban against nationals of Muslim countries under the banner of national security,” said Greg Chen of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.  (more)

liberal-menatl-disorder-275x75

Seriously?  This is not the first time we’ve heard and seen this absolutely insane argument in the media.  The United States Constitution ONLY covers American citizens, and lawful resident aliens. FULL-STOP.

The U.S. Constitution is not a global document protecting the rights of Iranians, Iraqis, Libyans, Somalians, Sudanese, Syrians and Yemeni nationals.  This legal narrative is complete nonsense, yet it shows how years of global liberalism have completely diminished even the most basic structural concepts of law, rights and privilege.

The fact that Reuters would even publish such a ridiculous proposition, reflects how far down this road of Brangelina Peacenik ‘we-are-the-world’ moonbattery we have traveled.

If the President of the United States wanted to effectively ban anyone who shows up at a port of entry wearing a yellow shirt, he/she is entirely within his/her legal and constitutional right to do so.

Cont. […]Trump’s order also suspends the Syrian refugee program until further notice, and will eventually give priority to minority religious groups fleeing persecution.

Trump said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network that the exception would help Syrian Christians fleeing the civil war there.

Legal experts were divided on whether this order would be constitutional.

“If they are thinking about an exception for Christians, in almost any other legal context discriminating in favor of one religion and against another religion could violate the constitution,” said Stephen Legomsky, a former chief counsel at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Obama administration.

WRONG.  President Trump can establish any arbitrary standard for the allowed or preferred U.S. immigration process, he deems in the nation’s interest.  President Obama did exactly the same thing with the reverse ideological intent.

In fact, President Trump could, by the constitutional power of his office, completely shut down the entire immigration and naturalization process, halting any further emigration to the U.S. permanently.

[…] Peter Spiro, a professor at Temple University Beasley School of Law, said Trump’s action would likely be constitutional because the president and Congress are allowed considerable deference when it comes to asylum decisions.

“It’s a completely plausible prioritization, to the extent this group is actually being persecuted,” Spiro said. (read more)

No person outside of the United States has a “RIGHT” to come to, or live in the United States of America.  Guest visitation (Visa approval) is a privilege, and emigration is entirely a structure of policy controlled by the executive branch of the U.S. through the Department of State.

trump-oval-office-3

Islam Demonstration

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Cultural Marxism, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2016, Illegal Aliens, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Occupy Type Moonbats, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Religion, Secretary of State, Syria, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized, United Nations. Bookmark the permalink.

808 Responses to Another Promise Fulfilled – President Trump’s Temporary Halt on Refugee Influx and Seven Nation Visa Suspension…

  1. sunnydaze says:

    Trudeau just tweeted that all these peeps are welcome to come to Canada!

    (per MSNBC)

    Yikers, Canadians, get this guy under control!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Dehbashi says:

    One thing isn’t clear to me. I know the ban on refugees is here for the 7 countries. But what happens if a US citizen wants to bring their wife who is living in one of those 7 countries. Would that be prevented or not? I am just wondering if it will be affected like this due to if it would prevent someone like the Syed Farook from bringing their wife over.

    It has not been clear from I can see

    Liked by 2 people

    • bertdilbert says:

      Buy American, Bride American, lol

      Liked by 1 person

    • annieoakley says:

      They will not even try to bring one over now.

      Liked by 1 person

    • sunnydaze says:

      If not already a US citizen, they are vetted and if they pass, they’re allowed in?

      We were not vetting people before this. UN was doing it or some such Bullsh*t?

      Like

      • Dehbashi says:

        OK. Like this to explain better. They are in the middle of the vetting process on whether the wife can get a visa or not. Would this stop that process completely so that there is no chance to get the visa or could the process complete during the middle of the ban and the wife may come over?

        Like

        • sunnydaze says:

          I can’t give you every detail, dehbashi. But my understanding is that this is NOT meant to categorically keep out every single ME citizen, come hell or high water.

          It is meant to properly vet them all, no matter who they are.

          Thus that Iraqi man this AM who was held 18 hours at JFK and then let go to enter the US.

          He’s not a US citizen BUT he worked with the US Army as an Interpreter over in Iraq.

          Like

    • Sandra-VA says:

      If the bride is from one of those listed countries and is not a US Citizen, then she would be affected. But you said she is a US Citizen… so I would expect a few questions at the border.

      Like

    • All American Snowflake says:

      No. No. No. Terrorist aren’t coming to the USA for freedom. And they don’t have a wife to bring over. They have to go back for a wife. Terrorist are really coming here for the pink and purple pussy.hats.

      Like

  3. frogstamper says:

    Notice how the “story” has changed from “the children” fleeing Syria (I have yet to see a Syrian – admittedly I have not seen every illegal migrant) to men fleeing persecution in various areas to who knows who/what/when/where…”doesn’t matter because they are seeking a better life.”

    Liberals are spoiled rotten individuals – wherever they go, they make a huge mess and then, those of us who are responsible citizens, come along behind and attempt a massive clean up.

    I love President Trump and I pray for his safety every day because this is gonna get a lot worse before it gets better.

    As a natural born citizen of the United States of America, I reject these illegal migrants and I stand with President Trump.

    As a Christian, I stand in defense of our Judeo-Christian culture and am prepared to remaining standing in support of President Trump – a true Patriot of the USA.

    If anyone – anyone – thinks for one moment that these illegal migrants plan to come here and assimilate, you are an idiot. A stupid, stupefying idiot.

    Kick ’em out and take their coats!!!

    Liked by 8 people

  4. NHVoter says:

    Meanwhile our former Governor Maggie Hassan (who’s now a senator) halted Syrians from resettling in NH.

    Liked by 1 person

    • frogstamper says:

      They are not 100% Syrian. I would wager on that. Most are Indian or Pakistani.
      And no doubt they really do want to leave those crapola countries – can’t blame them.
      But…they don’t go anywhere else because all other countries (except, apparently Canada) require compliance with specific entry regulations.

      Liked by 3 people

      • sunnydaze says:

        Most in Europe are neither 1) Syrian nor 2) Refugees

        Just random peeps who want to go to Europe and try their luck in the wealthier Euro countries like Germany and Sweden, UK, etc. The places that have “good” gov. handout “help”.

        Liked by 5 people

  5. NHVoter says:

    What a tool

    Like

  6. NHVoter says:

    LOL

    Liked by 1 person

  7. WeThePeople2016 says:

    George Soros-Financed Groups Scheme to Stop Trump’s Temporary Refugee Halt Order

    http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/01/28/george-soros-financed-groups-scheme-stop-trumps-temporary-refugee-halt-order/

    Liked by 1 person

  8. aProvider says:

    Trump stated during the campaign that refujihadists should be quartered in “safe” areas in the Middle East, and that countries who can well afford the cost should pay that. When he gets the opportunity to talk to these country’s political leaders that should be the agenda. Let them handle their own mess.

    Furthermore, we do not need to provide asylum or a place for these people at all. We have enough problems. Where is the UN in all of this? And we already have 94+millions of people not working.

    Liked by 5 people

    • 7delta says:

      Where is the UN in all of this?

      The OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation), as the largest non-state member of the UN, calls the shots about who is selected, which is not comforting, in the least, since they are devout representatives of all 57 Islamic states, plus Palestinians.

      Our workers over there are predominately Muslim, which isn’t comforting either. Technically, the State Dept. does have final say. It’s just that they don’t refuse very many, despite what they say about vetting. State is giving its authority to the UN. That’s unconstitutional.

      The average refugee to this country is a 25 year-old male. The average refugee to Europe is a male between the ages of 16-35. Womenz and chill’ins? Not so much.

      No one should be surprised by the fighting-age men immigrating, since, even though there is inter-Islamic violence between sects, regardless of whether someone is Sunni or Shia, it’s not about escaping Islam. It’s about the hizrah. Migrating to spread Islam.

      And yes, those running from another sect today, will be the pursuers tomorrow and both will unite against the infidel. they believe the same thing, with few differences.

      For the poor soul who truly wants out, there is no way for us to distinguish between the apostate and the devout jihadist.

      The UN is a criminal organization that wants to rule the world.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Gail says:

        Yes, their ultimate jihad is domination of the world through the hijrah and conversion or death for the infidels. At that time the world will end in “peace”. This is what is meant when they say that Islam is the religion of “peace”.

        Remember, Islam means “submission”. Submit to Allah. Submit to Islam and the Sharia.

        Liked by 3 people

  9. majorstar says:

    One detained refugee at JFK released from custody? http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/28/12-refugees-detained-under-ban-after-trumps-order-one-released-as-protests-grow.html

    Wtf is this about? On whose authority was this person released? If some airport or State Dept. official did this he needs to be fired and prosecuted. If the WH did this, they need to decide if they’re going to ban refugees or not. Come on, a ban is a ban. Stop these people and don’t cave to the globalist, lawless pressure you had to know would arise. If you give in this quickly then you don’t have the resolve to have given the order in the first place.

    Like

    • It’s still a developing story, majorstar. The first man released in NY had been an overseas translator with US military for 10 years, and was already three years into the vetting process. He never should have been prevented from entry, as he was a legitimate refugee supposedly under our protection. The second man was also released later. I don’t know his story. However, the ACLU already filed suit, and a federal judge has now blocked part of Trump’s seven country ban under an emergency stay that applies nationally. It’s going to have to work its way through the court system, and things could change as more details emerge. Here’s a very recent story:

      Liked by 1 person

  10. jameswlee2014 says:

    Trudeau’s welcome should be taken literally and the refugees should be dropped off at his house. Only fair, right, because they are going to get dropped off by somebody’s house.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s