Clinton Tells Executive Donors Vladimir Putin Had a “Personal Beef”…

Unable to stand in front of executive donors and tell the truth, Hillary Clinton told those who invested over a billion dollars in her campaign it was Vladimir Putin’s fault she didn’t campaign in August and never campaigned at all in Wisconsin

New York – Speaking to a group of donors in Manhattan, Mrs. Clinton said that Mr. Putin, the Russian president, had never forgiven her for the accusation she made in 2011, when she was secretary of state, that parliamentary elections his country held that year were rigged.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

“Putin publicly blamed me for the outpouring of outrage by his own people, and that is the direct line between what he said back then and what he did in this election,” Mrs. Clinton said.

[…]  Mrs. Clinton said the hacking was one of two “unprecedented” events that led to her defeat. The other was the release of a letter by James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, shortly before the election disclosing new questions about emails handled by her private server. The letter, she said, cost her close races in several battleground states.  (read more)

putinhead2Hillary - orange is the new black

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

512 Responses to Clinton Tells Executive Donors Vladimir Putin Had a “Personal Beef”…

  1. dbobway says:

    A pain Doctor told me that over time, continuous pain on a set of nerves, can wear the pain signal, from the nerve out to a point where a nerve gives out and goes numb.

    When will that pain from the nerve that Hillary Clinton keeps poking for 26 years of her in my life,

    finally go numb.

    It’s getting old!

    I do have an x-wife who pokes that same spot.

    That pain will never end.

    I’m Done.

    It’s time to save the world.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Mr. Izz says:

      My pain doctor purposely induced lesions on my nerves in order to stop the pain. There are many ways to get rid of things like that.

      Trump cut that nerve, and now America doesn’t have to deal with it.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. haoleboy says:

    I wonder if she is still asking “at this point what does it really matter?”

    She can Blame it all she wants on Putin , the most devastating leaks were from the inside by a Democrat who simply just couldn’t stand the lies and crimes anymore.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. mopar2016 says:

    It wasn’t Putin that was promising amnesty within the first hundred days.
    It wasn’t Putin that was calling for a 550% increase in so called Syrian refugees for America.
    It wasn’t Putin that was telling American young people that everything in life is free.

    Hillary was pushing a very anti American ticket, and she wonders why she lost.

    Liked by 7 people

  4. Howie says:

    Excluding California Trump won the vote by 1.4 million. The Sea Hag got 4.3 million more than us in California.
    California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

    It’s Official: Clinton’s Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California

    http://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/

    Liked by 6 people

    • TRiUMPh says:

      Howie,

      Good analogy frommCali and would like to add my own East Coast version: New York City has 8 million people, there are five boroughs in the city, so we can guesstimate that Queens (the largest borough has at least 2 million people. New York State went to Hillary before .01% of the vote was in! A guaranteed lock. So, let’s also guesstimate that the large percentage of voters in Queens went for her too.

      So, our question is like yours: Why should one-fifth of a large, liberal East Coast city, determine who will be the POTUS, because they are the ‘welfare, section 8, EBT-card holding voters’ she won by. One again, we thank the wisdom of our Founding Fathers for the Electoral College….;)

      MAGA!

      Liked by 4 people

      • sunnydaze says:

        All this brouhaha about the Electoral vs. Popular Vote is so disgusting. And if the MSM and Dem Party had even a fraction of responsibility they would not be feeding the narrative that it may be a plausible or even good idea to get rid of it.

        I swear, I know a woman who most people would consider “well educated and SMART” who actually signed that stupid Move On petition to get rid of the Electoral and go with the Popular.

        These people are insane. Straight Up.

        Liked by 2 people

        • TRiUMPh says:

          Sunny,

          There is one other part of the ‘popular vote formula’ that few people are talking about, and that is: In his final act of desperation, obama gave non-citizens the right to vote without penalty. So, how many voted? Two million? Three million? How about FIVE million illegal votes for the PizzaGate pedophiliac?

          Like

          • cali says:

            To be exact – 4 million illegals voted here in California for this hag due to Obama asking them to do so. Seeing many of them proudly admitting on their social media accounts that they did just that without having to face legal consequences – a promise made the American president Obama – they helped her win California.
            Remember – she lost the primary in California to Bernie Sanders despite denials of the US Pravda causing them rig the outcome.

            Like

    • UKExpat says:

      The Green NAZI Steins recount boondoggle revealed that THOUSANDS more votes were COUNTED for Clintoon than were actually cast in DETROIT. So extrapolate that CORRUPTION across all the CORRUPT DemoncRAT parts of the USA and eliminate all the DEAD VOTERS and the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS and FELONS who voted and the MULTI VOTING BLACKS and its perfectly clear that she never even won the Popular Vote with or without COMMIEfornia,

      Like

  5. justlurking14 says:

    “Russia did it” is just the public position she and her donors want us to discuss.

    Like

    • cali says:

      Easier to make s$it up as they go along – the Pravda forgot to report that the DHS hacked more than 4 states and this number continues to grow. Wasn’t barry that attempted to have the DHS taking control of the election? Now we know why!!

      Like

  6. Sherlock says:

    Probably been posted already, but I heard on FOX today that when the FBI went to RNC and said “We think somebody tried to hack you”, RNC said “Come in and help” and found that a very few documents had been obtained and that was that. FBI went to DNC and said “We think someone is trying to hack you” and DNC would not accept their help because of what they were afraid would be found, and because of HRC’s ongoing FBI investigation. So, regardless of Russia or whoever, it seems much of their problem stemmed, as usual, from Clinton’s crimes. Because of her crimes, they couldn’t accept help from law enforcement. Just like a dope dealer who’s been ripped off won’t go to the cops HRC and the DNC couldn’t go to the cops.

    Anybody seen anything written about this angle?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. deh3k says:

    Trump has deliberately or accidentally taken a genius approach to this Putin talk from Hillary and Obama – he selected Rex Tillerson for SOS, who among other excellent traits maintains a positive relationship with Russia.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Apfelcobbler says:

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Apfelcobbler says:

    This little speech reveals that Globalist Hillary is just fine with bringing in as many “undocumented” foreigners as fast as she can, so long as they vote Democrat!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. psadie says:

    This is what happens when you are a “habitual liar” you believe that anything you say is believable to others. What a waste of money…I hope they enjoyed the party for they paid for that too.

    Liked by 1 person

    • cali says:

      The truth as reported over at Politico: The dummies who donated 1.2 billion dollars – the donors – are beyond angry and pi$$ed demanding answers what happened and how she lost. They demanded explanations and/or answers while promising to stop immediate donations to anyone in the democratic party until they can clean up their mess and appoint competent leadership. What is a Hillary/Podesta et al to do to explain that loss to their actual corruption as exposed via WikiLeaks.
      As the UK former ambassador to Uzbekistan – Murphy and friend to Julian Assange – sated in his recent press conference: He personally rook a flight to DC to pick up leaked documents/emails from ‘insiders’ who were angry about the corruption of Hillary and their foundation. He made the pick directly from an intermediary who was used by the direct leakers and gave these emails/documents to Assange/WikiLeaks for immediate release. He stated on numerous occasions that Russia had nothing to do with these leaks and that it all came from insiders. He knows – he is the one who met in a park-like setting and rendesvouz to pick up that material.
      Assange has called on the democratic party, Obama and Hillary to submit their proof to WikiLeaks to authenticate the documents they claim came from Russia but so far no takers. Assange wants to show who really leaked these emails to him and WikiLeaks.

      Like

  11. GueppeBarre says:

    THAT almost got elected president, y’all! We have to do better!!

    Like

  12. skyborn78 says:

    If Putin has a “beef with Clinton”, he can get in line. There are millions of us who have much more than a “beef” with her; we can’t stand the sight of her.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. don welch says:

    putin’s a squealer!

    Like

  14. ZC says:

    She is utterly and completely delusional.

    Like

  15. Jeanmarc8 says:

    A few comments about Hillary Clinton’s blame game for losing the election.

    Placing the blame on Mr. Comey is laughable. Ms. Clinton made the choice to use one cell phone for both official and personal email. She had multiple options to put the matter behind her in the early campaign, and chose to delay, delay, delay, with the full support of her lawyers and DOJ lawyers. Her statements of “having no memory” in response to the questions from Judicial Watch likely caused even more concern. If there was nothing “there”, then she repeatedly made poor choices regarding her handling of the email issue, apparently with the full support of her political advisors and lawyers. That assumes that there was no “pay to play” documented in the email files. I think the voters came to appreciate that such may well be true, since there is no other reason to continue to stonewall that issue.

    Placing the blame on Mr. Putin is even more laughable. It implies the Mr. Putin and his experts obtained polling data from an unknown source to identify unknown, swing state voters and target them with unknown information to cause them to switch their votes to Donald Trump. It implies that Ms. Clinton chose incompetent polling experts for her campaign, regardless of the prices paid to them. I can see some senior Russian intelligent officers writing themselves up for the Order of Lenin for actions that “Caused the American population to vote for the inexperienced and unpopular Donald Trump over the vastly more popular and more experienced Hillary Clinton, as documented in the New York Times and Washington Post.” How can you argue with that?

    Finally, I suggest that Chief Information Officers and the Computer Security Officers for profit and non-profit companies should forward Mr. Podesta’s recent article in the Washington Post to the board of directors. The risks from apparent outcome in this case would seem to justify the massive pay increase for them, as well as demanding much more visibility by the company leadership.

    Like

  16. hellandahandbasket says:

    Sociopath Definition/Deconstruction Class is IN Session:
    Today’s subject – Hillary Rodham Clinton
    (I realize this is lengthy – but found it very insightful to understand both the Clinton’s; their relationship as husband/wife, and even Podesta, Huma and that Willy-Wag-Husband of hers)
    Profile of the Sociopath
    Glibness and Superficial Charm
    Manipulative and Conning
    -a- They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible.
    -b- They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used.
    -c- They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

    Grandiose Sense of Self
    -a- Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.”

    Pathological Lying
    -a- Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis.
    -b- Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities.
    -c- Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

    Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
    -a- A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core.
    -b- Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities.
    -c- Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims.
    -d- The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

    Shallow Emotions
    -a- When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive.
    -b- Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person.
    -c- Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

    Incapacity for Love
    Need for Stimulation
    Living on the edge.
    -a- Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal.
    -b- Promiscuity and gambling are common.

    Callousness/Lack of Empathy
    -a- Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others’ feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

    Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
    -a- Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim.
    -b- Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

    Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
    -a- Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet “gets by” by conning others.
    -b- Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.

    Irresponsibility/Unreliability
    -a- Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams.
    -b- Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause.
    -c- Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

    Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
    -a- Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.

    Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
    -a- Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

    Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
    -a- Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution.
    -b- Changes life story readily.

    <><> Other Related Qualities <><>
    * Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them;
    * Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them;
    * Authoritarian;
    * Secretive;
    * Paranoid;
    -Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired
    * Conventional appearance;
    * Goal of enslavement of their victim(s);
    -Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim’s life
    -Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim’s affirmation (respect, gratitude and love)
    * Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim;
    * Incapable of real human attachment to another;
    * Unable to feel remorse or guilt;
    * Extreme narcissism and grandiose;
    * ——> May state readily that their goal is to rule the world …! <——-

    http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s