Detroit Voter Fraud so Extensive Half of Initial Votes Ineligible for Recount…

If anyone thought a Michigan ballot recount was going to end up being a net positive for Hillary Clinton, they are intellectually disconnected from understanding the reality of how fraudulent the most democrat precincts are in Wayne County (Detroit) Michigan.

Election laws put into place specifically to protect the fraud, and ensure the manipulative discoveries are never identified, now mean the votes cannot be recounted.

detroit-elections-1

MICHIGAN – One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.

Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.

Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.

According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.  (read more)

detroit-elections-2trump detroit1

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized, Voter Fraud. Bookmark the permalink.

362 Responses to Detroit Voter Fraud so Extensive Half of Initial Votes Ineligible for Recount…

  1. LBB says:

    Maybe just for fun they could cross voting records (nationally) with IRS at tax time. Anyone expecting a refund would have to answer security questions. Which county did you vote in ? Who for? Or did not vote? Any discrepancy would trigger notation of such info / or follow up? Penalty?

    I know , extreme dreaming.

    Like

  2. Howie says:

    For this fiasco to continue now the democrat shills on the Canvassing Board would have to defy the Michigan Court of Appeals. They are democrat beurocrats and it would not surprise me.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Larry Ivy says:

      Would not be a popular thing if they continued at the expense of the taxpayers. Surely the MSC could issue some kind of injunction to prevent them expending tax payer funds for a further reoount. Since they are the scapegoat of the fiasco counts (twice) you would think they would want this to quietly end and go away.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Kintbury says:

      Read a comment somewhere that they are also counting Bernie Sanders write in votes for Hillary. After all, she needs all the help she can get. In one precinct, she got 306 votes from a total of only 50 actual ballots. That is almost as good a piece of luck as winning all coin tosses and card flips.

      Liked by 1 person

    • nooneofconsequence says:

      On the State of Wisconsin’s website you can download their recount spreadsheet. Although the recount results from Milwaukee County have not yet been reported , the recount numbers in many, many Wards show that Clinton has lost thousands of votes. Why is this amazing info not being reports?

      Like

  3. BrewCityNinja says:

    This is very interesting. You would think the machine and book not machining would force a by hand recount. Does Michigan keep paper ballots? So it seems Killary’s lawyers are involved just to stonewall the recount?

    Liked by 1 person

    • geoffb5 says:

      Michigan uses OCR read paper ballots. So yes there is a paper ballot.

      Liked by 1 person

    • scotl70 says:

      It should force a hand recount and verification of voter rolls. But, being a democrat fiefdom, they made special laws to protect the fraud.

      Like

    • DGinGA says:

      You know, as soon as I read that the law there is that if the machine totals do not match the poll records, the original count has to stand, I thought, “You know that law was put on the books by Democrats so that even if someone suspects fraud and demands a recount, their original result will stand.” Of course, they were expecting it to be the losing REPUBLICAN who demanded a recount, so they put this “failsafe” law in place. Good to see this backfire. And isn’t it interesting that they are supposed to be recounting Michigan, but instead are really only focused on Detroit and Flint. Hillary also won Washtenaw County and I am certain there is vote fraud there with all of the university students, many of whom I suspect vote twice – once at school and by absentee ballot at home.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Dst1964 says:

      Exactly my thought! If there are more votes than registered voters in a precinct, then they were obviously letting them vote without being registered. It’s obvious there was voter fraud going on in Wayne Co. The MI state government should investigate these discrepancies as possible voter fraud now that the MI recount has been stopped by the courts. The recount law seems like another Democratic scheme to keep perpetual voter fraud from being discovered. And Dems keep claiming there’s no evidence of voter fraud. Well now we know one of the reasons we’ve not seen the evidence!

      Like

  4. ZurichMike says:

    You will see the Michigan case vanish because the corruption in favor or Hillary is about to be exposed, and we can’t have that, can we?

    Liked by 25 people

  5. Stephen says:

    This sounds like the goings-on in some third-world sewer.

    And it is.

    Liked by 6 people

  6. SoCal Patriot says:

    Maybe someone can explain to me how the Secretary of State for Michigan certified the results a few weeks ago, but now can’t do a recount. I don’t get it.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Raffaella says:

      Yes this does not make any sense at all. How could they certify those results if there were discrepancies to begin with?

      Liked by 6 people

    • DGinGA says:

      That, combined with the fact that it took a couple of weeks to certify the vote for the state. They could have recounted the entire thing by hand a couple of times.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      Behind closed doors things are “observed by election judges . Everyone running has their own judges to observe that nothing is done underhanded. Machines nes have to be calibrated . It is a process and it often has to be repeated several times to insure things are right. Often there is descrepancys for a lot of reasons but miner . Miner as in minus or plus 0.01 or such/ when machines are counting right # of a ballots are counted / then votes . Votes cast should equal Ballots, simple deal. . The process if it appears close may be repeated until there is a mathematical certainty of winner. On check and balances the election will be “certified” . Ballots are retained by set time mandated by law. Recounts are regulated by laws as well. In my experience the only way you could cheat is to manage to somehow replace ballots between polling place and counting rooms but they are in a chain of possession so you would really have to corrupt many people and to what point a loser winning in a district? Really I know things have changed from the 90 s but not that much. Most of the bull shit about stuffing boxes is just bluster and saber rattling , but the issue of illegals voting is absolutely a valid concern as is dead men on rolls and muti- state registration

      Like

    • Larry Ivy says:

      Its the district canvassers who certified vote totals even tho the numbers were off, twice !
      But these are the same people admonished by the MI Appeals Court yesterday for allowing this to go on in the first place. They began recount along with the board when it was an obvious violation. Aside from totals, it seems there is also a problem in securing the votes in appropriate containers with appropriate seals.

      Like

    • Larry Ivy says:

      Canvassers are not following election laws and the board is aware but did nothing. Improper boxes, seals, counts, etc. shows lack of adherence and Canvassers passed their totals anyway. Officials called them “lax”.

      Like

    • wasntme says:

      That’s what I’ve been thinking. If they aren’t eligible for a recount due to discrepancies, why are they included in the first count?

      Like

  7. Pingback: Some parts of Michigan so fraught with voter fraud they can’t do a recount

  8. Sherlock says:

    “In Detroit, 158 of the 392 precincts with ballot discrepancies had just one extra ballot accounted for either in the poll book or in the ballot box, according to the Wayne County’s canvassing report.

    For suburban Wayne County, 72 percent of the 218 precincts boxes with discrepancies in the number of ballots were off by one ballot.”

    In a case of massive fraud, would not one expect the number of votes to greatly exceed the count in the “poll book”? Here, the discrepancy seemed to go both ways. Maybe I’m not understanding the terms.

    Like

    • Michael Campbell says:

      I believe that is just spin and more lies. If it were simply off by 1 vote they would reconcile that precinct by removing the ballot and counting the rest. I believe it’s more like hundreds of votes and they are saying that it is one and then ordering us to move along.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      Your correct this is not indication of anything other than we live in imperfect world. Depending on number of votes cast one ballot could be indicative of 0.0001 that’s in +- range used by aircraft engineers you can’t find those little marks on a tape measure we’re talking a one in ten thousand or less . Actually come to think about it this count totals seem pretty close and accurate don’t they? In light of the fact that push or shove it won’t effect the outcome so there you have it a ringer we have a winner folks not based on any state or district but all of America soooo MERRY CHRISTMAS and HAPPY BIRTHDAY LORD JESUS ( amen

      Like

  9. SMP Belltown says:

    Maybe all of the voters didn’t have an actual text option to vote for “None of the Above” on the presidential part of the ballot. If not, should their votes for state races, reps, governor, initiatives, judges, etc. all be tainted as fraud ballots because they didn’t select a prez from the top list?

    Like

    • DGinGA says:

      I think your ballot only gets rejected if you vote for too many people for one office, not if you don’t vote for any. I remember the Florida recount in 2000 where AlGore’s lawyers argued that if someone left the Presidential option blank on the ballot it was automatically a vote for him. Couldn’t deal with the fact that he bought and paid for a certain number of votes and then did not get them. He also only wanted the votes recounted in certain counties, not all of them, and he didn’t want absentee ballots counted, since they are largely military who vote Republican.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      There is always a place to designate no one. It’s where you can write in whoever you want . Have you ever voted?

      Like

      • Wayne Robinson says:

        You also can vote for two different people of course but all spoiled ballots may be replaced.

        Like

      • Sherlock says:

        In my state, we rejected a ballot initiative that gave the “None of the above”option on the ballot. Of course, it is permissible so simply not mark a box in a particular race and that does not void the ballot where I live, just means you didn’t vote in that race.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Wayne Robinson says:

          In most jurisdictions when we go to polls it’s not about one race but multiple races. I’ve herd of ballots now being counted in a given contest but it not effecting vote for other contest on same ballot .

          Like

  10. Illegal says:

    Apparently if the number of ballots and the number of voters on the books don’t match then there can’t be a recount in that precint. The result is the oringal vote count certifed by the the State remains and no recount occurs. Great there are less precints to recount.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      Sick bird is right just as there are election laws there is a section covering recounts. America has entered again a phase where governing individuals even judges will disregard our laws to our own hurt but unlike the poor bastards in Oakland California fire , we can appeal dumb illegal judgements

      Like

  11. Patriot1 says:

    If the machines don’t match the poll books then the entire polling place should be disqualified.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      No only recount. The process isn’t perfect. The recount is a challenge to winner . If counts differ at recount substantially from box totals that box can not be in recount , the original certified count stands . No one can come in after the fact and replace ballots or apparently kick a box causing a whole and think it will change a thing.

      Like

      • Sherlock says:

        I think that’s probably the reason for the statute cited in the article, but it also seems to have the perverse effect of allowing the results to stand if somebody does the ballot stuffing on election night, IF I’m reading the statute right. Big IF, as frankly I’m not 100% sure of what the terminology used in the statute means.

        Like

  12. wodiej says:

    How do we know the pollworkers and canvassing board isn’t corrupt too?

    Liked by 1 person

    • DGinGA says:

      Guess what? They are, especially in those areas.

      Like

    • Wayne Robinson says:

      Everyone is corrupt but not about everything. We watch one another I’m for Trump your for whoever, if you put your thumb on the scale I’m turning on the light. What part is so mysterious? Voting or counting votes? Do you not think other people can have honest difference of opinion and still hold to personal nap ethics and accountability? Most of the decisiveness is bluster where each side is accusing the other and saying hoorah for my side . We go this way every couple years . Yes your traditionally gonna find more evil crap from the progressives than Republicans but stop and think what about Nixon and ford? Neither party is lily white but now evil is becoming more so and the stage is set now there is a great struggle between light and dark / evil and good so as Reagan said “TRUST BUT VERIFY”

      Like

  13. itsy_bitsy says:

    I have known, for a fact, since 2012 how blatant the voter fraud can be on the democrats side, especially with blacks. In Florida at one precinct it was observed that a large bus pulled up in front of a local precinct. Blacks poured off the bus and into the precinct. When they returned to the bus they showed the driver their “voted” sticker and received a ten dollar bill in exchange! Many of us have observed these practices across the nation, but especially on the eastern seaboard and in the midwestern states. This fraud should be punishable by a stint in prison!

    Liked by 3 people

    • DGinGA says:

      I lived in Wisconsin in 2000 and television stations actually filmed Gore campaign people bribing homeless people with food, cigarettes, and, yes, money, to go with them to the polls. College students in Milwaukee and Madison bragged on camera about voting at home by absentee ballot and voting at school in person. The Democrat district attorneys in both counties refused to investigate and prosecute.

      The Dems scream about voter fraud, but they are the ones most likely to be engaging in it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Larry Ivy says:

        The CA and NV illegal voting is much more blatant on a larger scale. Thousands registered to vote and do. Mail in and walk up. Motor voter registration is a big culprit and then mail in ballots makes it very easy.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Wayne Robinson says:

        This is correct most corruption is on Democratic side especially in DOJ they have so many corrupt judges. Collectively we Republicans have a lot of money , why don’t we buy some ? Corrupt judges I mean. Of course this is nonsense this is not the way to destroy your enemies there is only one way . You have to win them to your side . I liked what Trump said during primaries about unruly protester . He said if you could talk with them it would soon be evident they want the same thing security safety a good job hope for the future. I don’t think for one minute recounting votes is gonna change anything but I believe in watching. I don’t think this crap about electoral college voting against voters. We just watched same crap about lying Ted all these men were gonna revolt and support Ted come on people get a grip this is Dec let celebrate Gods faithfulness and love wish even your enemies MERRY Christmas just think America will soon be rejoicing over the hope of a new beginnings to make America greater than ever before. I’m thankful for Donald Trump and his family . Shortly after Christmas is New Year’s Day we will be ringing out the dirty wash with solemn hope of new beginnings under good sound governance and this to wash down over the whole nation continually for next eight years and beyond . We have so much to be happy about.?

        Like

  14. Octavian says:

    Is it possible Jill Stein is trolling Hillary? She was all out against her during the election season. She knows there was voter fraud in those states that were very narrowly won. Maybe she’s trying to ingratitude herself with the Trump admin by pointing out just how extensive the fraud really was.

    Like

    • Gabby R. says:

      She wouldn’t be going after the state’s Trump won if so. Her agenda is so obvious, on one of her MSM interviews she basically said that Trump did not win the popular vote, and Republicans have not won these states in years, so something is wrong with the votes. She’s working with Hillary, threatened by Hillary, whatever it is, no way she is “on our side” here. Also- I don’t think she has made a peep about the Detroit vote fraud on her Twitter. If she was trying to find fraud, wouldn’t she be out having another press conference now highlighting these discrepancies?

      Liked by 2 people

  15. Dean Z. Douthat says:

    Idiotic law (“Fraud Protection Act”) was put in place back when D’s ruled the roost here in MI.

    If somebody were to file suit challenging that law, I expect it would be ruled unconstitutional. But who has standing to file such a suit?

    Like

  16. Ken Andrews says:

    There is silver lining to this idiotic recount… It is shedding light on some of the massive Democrat VOTER FRAUD, and they still couldn’t win!

    >

    Liked by 3 people

  17. Ken Andrews says:

    Massive Democrat voter fraud in Michigan comes to light in wake of the idiotic recount… And they still couldn’t win LMAO

    >

    Like

  18. With the fraud in Detroit about to ADVERSELY EXPOSE the dirty hands of the Democrats and with the MI Appeals Court just ruling Stein’s #RECOUNT2016 is illegal — this house of cards is going to collapse quickly….Too bad – I’d like to see the dirt in Detroit exposed nationally to show how rigged the national election system really is…

    Like

  19. Rob says:

    If you need a laugh check this guy out:

    https://www.palmerreport.com/

    If you can stand to root around that cesspool, you’ll find stories about how this lunatic believes the ballot issues in Wayne are proof of GOP fraud!!

    Like

  20. David says:

    Democrats cheat, who would of guessed?

    Like

  21. Melanie Melancon says:

    I have worked as the manager of a precinct in Mississippi. We used touch screen machines. Before doors opened, we were required to print a beginning vote tally from each machine. Inside each machine was a roll of tape similar to calculator paper. These beginning tallies showed zero votes on each machine. We were required to print two of them. One was torn off and sealed in a bag. The second remained on the internal roll. As voters came in, if they had no ID, or their info didn’t match info on the voter rolls, they were allowed to submit a paper ballot. If all was correct, they voted on the machines. All voters signed on the voter roll, including those with paper ballots.

    At closing, each machine printed a closing report, three of them for each machine. One stayed in the machine canister, canister removed and sealed in carrier bags, and turned in at headquarters. Workers were required to balance total votes, machine and paper ballots, to total signatures in the poll books. One report was posted publicly at the precinct, and one was sealed into bags along with machine memory cards , machine canisisters, and worker reports.

    After all reports were balanced, every item supporting voter counts was sealed into a box, and the manager took these boxes to headquarters.

    Voting machines are NOT connected to the internet. Unless there is a planned collusion between workers, it would be extremely difficult to tamper with vote totals, either individually or in total. Some states may have systems which would be easier to tamper with, but most systems are comparable to ours, not easy to tamper with.

    Sorry to be so long, but not everybody understands how systems are designed.

    Like

  22. justlurking14 says:

    Meanwhile, the recount in Milwaukee, Wisconsin has taken an interesting turn:

    Hillary is losing votes in Milwaukee by the tens of thousands, says Alexander Higgins. Milwuakee County isn’t finished recounting, but the number of Hillary votes to be thrown out is upwards of 32,000. Lost 18,000+ on Day 3 and more yesterday (Day 5).

    http://alexanderhiggins.com/hillary-clinton-loses-32423-votes-day-5-wisconsin-recount/

    Like

  23. justlurking14 says:

    The absentee ballots in Milwaukee haven’t been counted yet. From another Higgins article posted yesterday:

    The Wisconsin Board of Elections of elections is withholding Milwaukee absentee ballots from the official recount which as of day 5 shows Hillary Clinton losing 34,243 votes.

    In doing so they may be telegraphing to the public there has been vote fraud conducted on behalf of Hillary Clinton as the missing votes, whether or not they are all absentee ballots, vastly favor Hillary Clinton by a margin of 10 to 1.

    According to the official original vote counts, Hillary Clinton won Milwaukee county by a little over a 2 to 1 margin winning 288,797 votes compared to Donald Trumps 125,846 votes which represents a 2 to 1 margin.

    Digging into the recount results more glaring anomalies pop out, including one ward which Hillary won by a margin of 242 to 1 and six with margins higher than 100 to 1.

    As the recount continues, some of these originally reported vote margins are being revised way downward more inline with the win margins of neighboring wards and with the county wide average.

    For example, Hillary Clinton won Ward 34 by a margin of 100 to 1 in the original count but the recount now has it 2 to 1.

    Oddly Hillary only won neighboring wards 33 and 35 by 2 to 1 margin which is inline with the county average.

    Like

  24. justlurking14 says:

    Link for the second Higgins article:

    http://alexanderhiggins.com/wisconsin-recount-shows-potential-clinton-vote-fraud/

    Higgins point is that the 32,000 vote discrepancy in the incomplete Milwaukee count seems to indicate that the absentee ballots in the county are more than 10-to-1 in favor of Hillary, in a county that Hillary won 2-to-1.

    Gotta hang in until all the cards are turned over. Still, the discrepancies appear substantial.

    Like

  25. triper57 says:

    Interesting development. It would appear that the new AG would start an investigation of this voter fraud. Makes one wonder if Jill isn’t a stalking horse for this particular form of voter fraud. If not then why would she file for a recount. She and Hill both had to know they were pulling this election sham.

    Makes one wonder if O was elected twice this way.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sassy says:

      It’s probably in the realm of probability now. It’s what I have always believed, anyway. The only reason their vote fraud system failed this time is because they must have believed the polls and didn’t factor in the quiet, cold anger vote–the monster vote–for Trump. In other words, they underestimated how many votes they needed to rig up while keeping it “plausible.” Let’s hope that Trump and a Republican Congress will put a stop to all this fraud and to the illegal alien votes, too, once and for all.

      Like

  26. Thomas Rightmyer says:

    In NC (Asheville 10) where I served we have paper ballots counted by machine. Election workers have to verify (1) machine prints “zero tape” at beginning and two results tapes at end – one for county Board of Elections, one posted at poll. (2) number of ballots issued minus ballots spoiled by voter and replacement issued must equal number of ballots put through counting machine, (3) ballots taken at end of voting to Board of Elections. Paper ballots can be handcounted if need be.

    Like

  27. got243kids says:

    Certainly explains there arrogance about Trump ever having a chance to become president. “He’ll never be president, I guarantee it; said Dingy Harry, Nazi Pelosi, Buck O’fama, Tom Hanks, CNN, the spew (View), Van Jones, Samuel Jackson, George Cloony, and all those dead head late night Jake Aces….”

    MAGA! And enjoy the snow melt.

    Like

  28. Ed Heeney says:

    The LibTARDS can’t even cheat well.

    Like

  29. Dan says:

    This voter suppredsion, not fraud.

    Like

  30. I have documented evidence of multiple voter i.d. cards and their ballots being issued to persons who were not US citizens amd who themselves did not go and vote but someone did in their name. Additionally, the persons were all unlawfully registered as Democrats even though all wanted to be registered as Reoublicans once their naturalization came through. All these persons were in Wayne County. The voter fraud is MASSIVE!

    Like

  31. That is a great way to use the laws to shape the outcome of a supposedly democratic election. If you could be so kind as to check out my blog.

    Like

  32. This is a problem in more than just Detroit. If they would audit the election I guarantee trump would also win the popular vote if all non legit votes were thrown out

    Like

  33. Pingback: Problem: What Republicans Aren’t Working On – Military Votes Count

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s