Jake Tapper is Shocked, S.H.O.C.K.E.D, That Donna Brazile Would Tip Off Clinton On CNN Townhall Questions…

Back in March CNN held a Town Hall event with Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.  Jake Tapper and Roland Martin were moderators.   It is now confirmed that CNN’s Donna Brazile had an advance copy of at least one of the questions for Hillary Clinton and gave Clinton a heads’-up so she could prepare – FULL BACKSTORY


Now Jake Tapper is clutching his pearls, shocked – SHOCKED, that Donna Brazile would leak the questions. He said so on WMAL (Listen Below):

Additionally, in ’93 Jake Tapper was the Press Secretary for Chelsea Clinton’s mother-in-law, representative Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky.

This entry was posted in Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, media bias, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

281 Responses to Jake Tapper is Shocked, S.H.O.C.K.E.D, That Donna Brazile Would Tip Off Clinton On CNN Townhall Questions…

  1. TwoLaine says:

    YES Tapper, the system is rigged. You gettin’ it now?

    I came up with a simple analogy on the tax b.s. today, that maybe even the idjuts who read from teleprompters at all the faux newz channels can understand.

    Overpaying your taxes is like tipping the gubt for a job well done.

    Seriously, who in their right mind would do that? They can’t even keep track of the $$$ we do give them. $6 BILLION floated away under ILLary’s watch. The Oh? gives it away by the pallet. They pay dead people, presumably to vote.for them. Let me count the ways…

    BTW, I know people who are happy to pay their taxes ONLY because they tell themselves it all goes to the military, for our protection. And, quite frankly, that is just about all it should be paying for. Pretty much everything else is OVERREACH!

    Liked by 16 people

  2. Bluto ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵈᴿᵘᴺᵏᵃᴿᵈ says:

    SUNDANCE! What the heck?

    Jake Tapper actually responded to you via Twitter? Man, he never replies to me. Maybe I’m being too nice???

    Liked by 13 people

    • tinkerthinker2 says:

      I’m banned from his twitter, shocked!!! I tell you!

      Liked by 8 people

    • He has responded back to even me on twitter twice. I think he’s just a “list person.” I think he is very meticulous about his lists and I don’t think he sleeps until everything is done and checked off on his list. He’s an efficient SECRETARY and conscientious but he is lacking in common sense and can’t see the forest for the trees and thinks if he provides an answer all is well in Jake Land. He’s really so deep in the PC NWO culture he cannot even see he is a shill and being used in the worst way. A shame, he is so young and he is already an old man. The stress of lying will do that to a person, he thinks he is telling the truth because he doesn’t believe telling half truths and omitting facts accounts for LYING.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Sandra says:

    Tapper’s tweet should have said “Trump may not have OWED income taxes” If you don’t owe it you’re not going to pay it. There isn’t a donation line, if I recall correctly.

    Liked by 25 people

  4. auscitizenmom says:

    This is just so cool. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  5. andi lee says:

    Relative: The Society of Professional Journalism Blog, SPJ Chairman of Ethics, Andrew M. Seaman weighs in:

    “NBC Owes Viewers Explanations about Trump Tape.”


    A Few Commentors.

    Liked by 5 people

    • KBR says:

      Dumb article IMO. The writer’s only concern is keeping the entertainment and news departments separated. He’s apparently not concerned with both departments doing tabloid yellow journalism nor with confusing “news” with propaganda.
      Nor is the writer of this article concerned whatsoever with collusion with a political party.

      Society of Professional Journalism?
      No they need to change their name: Society of Professional Propagandists.

      Liked by 5 people

    • bofh says:


      “As someone who often speaks out when news organizations violated the basic ethical principles of journalism, I often choose not to write about violations involving TODAY or ABC’s Good Morning America. Those shows have a long history of cringe-worthy ethical violations, and cries of foul fall on deaf ears.

      Say what? “…choose not to write about” ? So it’s OK for them to continue acting this way because you’re tired of complaining. Time to resign your post, you bloated, self-aggrandizing wimp. “Ethics Committee” my ass.

      “Andrew M. Seaman is the chairperson of the Society’s ethics committee.”


  6. kingjulianx says:

    Here is some good news.We did the gun show today in Melbourne florida’ and it was great. We gave out all we had for Trump&Pence signs and bumper stickers. Absolutely nobody believes the media about the false touching claims. There were also entire families voting for Trump&Pence telling us they don’t usually tell people because there scared of backlash. Just some information from Brevard county for you all.

    Liked by 17 people

  7. Enlightened Vulgarian says:

    I remember Jake Tapper from his Washington City Paper days. Here’s one of his cover stories….


    I was shocked when I read this. Shocked, I tell you….

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Honest Abbey says:

    I loathe Jake Tapper.
    He puts on that damn smirk and gloats every time someone mentions David Duke’s name.

    Tapper had himself convinced that it would be his incessant, nagging “Do you disavow David Duke” crap that would end Donald Trump’s campaign.

    He could not have been more wrong!

    Liked by 6 people

  9. moe2004 says:

    I am not afraid, we are going to win this.

    Liked by 14 people

      • MzMolly says:

        I love seeing the blue screen, knowing it’s you Sundance, walking right along side us.

        Thank you for that always.

        Also, learned how to tweet and have been spreading pro Trump tweets. There are some angry HRC supporters. WOW! They know how to attach a person. Must mean I hit a cord😊.

        Liked by 6 people

      • NvMtnOldman says:

        Sundance–Is it possible to add up the number of people at the Trump rallies so far and then compare to Hillery’s???? I think that would be classic. I am not computer savvy to do it. Thanks. Trump 2016


        • Peg_C the Deplorable says:

          I know several people who have attended more than one but I doubt it’s a significant number. They got such a high off it they just had to go to another one.


    • E C says:

      With a major assist from the media. Like wow.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Well, I would hope ANYONE in a fight would enter the ring thinking and planning to WIN. If they didn’t they would be a spectator, spectators are the only ones that aren’t sure who will win, BUT A FIGHTER ALWAYS KNOWS HE WILL WIN when he steps in that ring.

      Same with a LION.

      The minute you doubt is the minute you are no longer a fighter but a spectator or just a gambler on the sidelines.


      In any case, taking back our country is something we can do regardless. Taking doesn’t involve asking. Taking doesn’t involve obeying anti-constitutional laws being used against us. Taking doesn’t involve accepting a hoodwinked stolen election either. You TAKE your country back. It’s an act. Not a thought.

      WE WILL WIN!

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Yo Jake,

    Lt. John F Kerrys awards and citations

    Lt. John F Kerrys problem with his sleep disorder , his sleep walking, his bed wetting, the drugs he took for the problem in a war zone , what’s the news on that Jake?

    Liked by 4 people

  11. Rick says:

    Another hack to attack!

    Liked by 6 people

  12. SR says:

    I am hearing some kind of Hillary’s lesbian relationship is coming out before debate. If there is real proof may be Wikileak if true then she is done.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. georgiafl says:

    @welshtwitt linked above tweets about another story the media ignores:

    Liked by 7 people

  14. Ponderosa_pine says:

    The question of why doesn’t the media pander to both democrats and republicans if there really is a uniparty involves the dialectic of Marx and Alinsky; che Garvara, etc.You have one party to be the problem and the other to be the cure; both controlled by the same, behind the scenes, controllers. (In Guatamala The shining path came in at night and drug the mayor’s family into the street and murdered them; the next day they came back and said ‘what carnage’ shocking!, if we were in power this would not have happened!!) Same here.


  15. silverlakela says:


    “The Best Government Money Can Buy.”


  16. Sedanka says:

    Tapper’s tweets are among the most elitist and condescending among all media people, and that’s saying something. He really believes he’s bringing enlightenment to us little peasants.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. silverlakela says:

    With the president’s knowledge — and involvement — in Hillary’s private e-mail scheme, it’s clear there was never going to be a prosecution.


    Liked by 2 people

  18. Bill says:

    I copied and pasted this off another blog:

    As a former journalist I will give you my assessment of journalism in America today. It is dead. In fact, journalism contracted “cancer” soon after the infamous Watergate scandal, metasticized during the Clinton era, before taking its final breath upon the inauguration of Barack Obama.
    When I studied Journalism at the University of Florida, we were taught how to find a story, what tools were needed to research the background of the story and to verify, verify, verify! Any bias, prejudices or preconceived notions were to be “checked at the door”. If you felt you were unable to be thorough and impartial, then you were expected to turn down the assignment or pack your bags.
    I have given much thought as to the who, what, when, where and why of journalism’s death, but my personal theory is that the “cancer” actually came from a hidden and curious source — Hollywood. So to backtrack a little, I guess the real “cancer” was actually introduced during the JFK era, saw some strains of “infection” during Reagan’s era, but really took off with the “cool” saxophone playing Clinton, before total, incurable consumption came about with the “ultra cool” Obama.
    In essence, politicians LOVE the glitz of Hollywood, and Hollywood loves to be loved, especially by people in power. Mind you they rarely — if ever — back what many in Hollywood perceive as the old, rich, white Republican. That’s not cool. Those stodgy Republicans aren’t fun. They’re too serious, they focus too much on policies and procedures. Meanwhile, because Hollywood actors base their careers on feelings, they often “feel” connected to the social issues that affect them and their friends. And nobody does emotional issues like Democrats, right? Democrats don’t get bogged down with details. They prefer to fight for issues that affect people on an emotional level, like abortion, same sex marriage, etc. Actors and artists will then use their platforms — movies, television, music, art, etc.– to reinforce those emotions, and therefore these two seemingly diverse groups use each other very well.
    Forgive my verbosity, but the point is this: One of the biggest events every year in Washinton is the Correspondent’s Dinner, where politicians, journalists and Hollywood players all schmooze and drink and laugh at how great they all are. This annual celebration — of each other — fosters a togetherness, that in turn creates “biases, prejudices and preconceived notions”. No journalist wants to research and uncover “bad” things about their buddies because it would harm the friendships and pathways to possible greater personal fame or wealth. So instead of doing their jobs, many “journalists” decide to forfeit their integrity, common sense and morals in order to protect their buddies. They avoid any possibility of discovering that their “buddy” is actually a liar, a theif, a rapist or a traitor, because they want to keep running in this special circle of beautiful and powerful people.
    Today, journalism “celebrates” it’s own death by purposely and willfully destroying its own tenets afforded them as members of the Fourth Estate. Why else would editors of the once venerable New York Times boast of being willing to break the law in order to illegally obtain and print a presidential candidate’s tax returns? Why else would the Washington Post brag about assigning 22 reporters to dig hard and deep in order to find ANYTHING remotely damaging on that same candidate? Why won’t ANY of these same publications provide true and equal treatment to the other side? I mean, look at the dozens upon dozens of truly “meaty” stories that could be told about the sale of arms to ISIS, the real story of what happened to four Americans in Benghazi, the true economic outlook for this country, the behind doors speeches where Americans of all stripes are referred to as a “basket of losers”, the gritty details of the unconstitutional Iran treaty, the massive immigration mess or the growing voter fraud that threatens to destroy this republic. Instead, journalists have turned over their integrity to an international “hacker” because they refuse to do their jobs. I mean as a former journalist, I see endless story possibilities, and yet I never see stories of this nature researched and written about. Our forefathers would be ashamed.

    Liked by 9 people

  19. Rick says:

    Liked by 4 people

  20. Mr. Morris says:

    It is marvelous to read how Sundance is educating the metrosexual known as Jake Tapper. Jake is so smug and condescending. He is a genuine prick, one of many who chose propaganda as a career. Is Jake delusional enough to think he has any credibility? Ho, ho, ho!

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Alison says:

    Chalked? Jake Tapper was C.H.A.L.K.E.D.?


  22. yakmaster2 says:

    Jake Tapper, Liberal Elitist and Clinton Lackey is regarded by Podesta to also be a “d*ck.”
    Tsk. That’s gotta sting a bit when you’ve sold your soul to be a company man and the “company” thinks you’re a doofus jerk. But, alas, Tapper really IS one.

    What’s Donna Brazile saying these days about her cut and paste of a Debate/Town Hall moderator question? Wowsa. These Clinton operatives really utilize that particular software function don’t they? Saves so much time when cheating!

    Liked by 1 person

  23. maga2016 says:

    shocked? I would be surprised if it was only 1 question.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Polish Rifle says:

    Tapper maliciously targeted conservatives during his college days at Dartmouth back in the early 90s.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Bart Manson ✓ᴺᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰᵃˡᶦˢᵗ says:

    I remember when journalists had to confirm something with two separate, independent sources.

    Now we have the “may have” threshold.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. cali says:

    Jake Tapper is barking up the wrong tree when it comes to paying or not paying taxes! He should take a closer look at his gals Hillary, their foundations and other charities which they use to funnel their personal expenses through. They only pay out about 3% of all funds out for charitable causes and the rest stays with them and their personal needs and overhead costs.
    That part is called ‘personal income’ and taxed accordingly. The Clinton’s are slick though because they keep that money in these charitable accounts while they use it at the same time as their slush fund. Not one of them has a job ergo no personal income other then their government funded retirement or social security – either or together would never be enough to fund their lifestyle and purchases.
    The recent 1 million dollar check received by Bill Clinton from Qatar as birthday gift – should be taxed using ‘gift tax’ which is around 47%. If Tapper believe the Clinton’s pay that tax then my name is santa claus.
    All in all – DT has been audited year after year and if he indeed failed to pay taxes for 18 years as Tapper claims to ‘be fact’ the IRS would either billed him or imprisoned him. Therefore – its a lie.
    The Clinton’s on the other hand are intentionally defrauding the IRS and although they amended their tax returns this past year – 7 times for tax year 2004 – 2008 – obviously they cheated only amending as their pay-to-play surfaces in the news.
    As I’ve said – I would love to audit the Clinton family and their finances/taxes without charge – just to proof what tax cheaters and tax evaders look like. The little that is available on line caused my curiosity because their numbers did not add up and looked to me to be fudged – badly fudged.
    Considering the IRS leadership – they were able and are able to get away with tax fraud.
    I would volunteer with a couple of PriceWaterHouse auditors to undertake that endeavor.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Peg_C the Deplorable says:

      The statute of limitations for tax audits varies but appears to be limitless if frauds are suspected. Next year there should be a yuge new broom sweeping clean all at agencies and departments with a lot of very tough and smart heads appointed. There could be quite the multi-pronged attack consuming the Clintons and a lot of other, very shady characters in their orbit, soon..


  27. Paul Killinger says:

    Tapper has stumbled upon the biggest reason Hillary can’t be elected President… NO ONE CAN GIVE HER THE ANSWERS!

    Of course, she couldn’t give a hoot if she she has the answers or not… TO HELL WITH AMERICA, she’ll rake in BILLIONS!


  28. SNAKESRULE says:

    jakey wears pearl necklaces for sure.


  29. Nate says:

    Please everyone listen: The crazy Dems are trying like hell to scapegoat Russia when no proof has been demonstrated to cover for their sleazy and dishonest ways. They are dangerously demonizing them for their own failures. All they have is their childish and endless race, gender, religious baiting and all they’re really doing is a disservice to real victims throwing these terms out so loosely. Brazile is pathetic and stupid, these Dems are manipulators. Don’t watch MSM if you want honesty.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s