North Carolina Mob Attack Female Truck Driver – Police Refuse to Help, Desperate Calls To Media Chopper…

Following an officer involved shooting in Charlotte North Carolina yesterday a mob of angry protestors assembled. Immediately the protesting mob began attacking police officers and vehicles. The mob clashed with police and riot squads were called, tear gas deployed.  – FULL DETAILS

nc-riot-7

The mob grew into approximately a thousand people who then moved collectively onto interstate 85 and blocked traffic. Several vehicles were caught by the mob included numerous tractor trailers.

Then this happened:

nc-riot-4

nc-riot-1nc-riot-5nc-riot-2nc-riot-6nc-riot-3

nc-riot-8

Democrats Civility

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Anti-White Intifada, BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Cultural Marxism, Death Threats, media bias, Polar Bear Hunting, Police action, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Racism, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

638 Responses to North Carolina Mob Attack Female Truck Driver – Police Refuse to Help, Desperate Calls To Media Chopper…

  1. Yaupiko says:

    Reblogged this on TheWorldNow.

    Like

  2. Geri Smith says:

    Jennifer Roberts (politician) Democrat Mayor of Charlotte
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Roberts_(politician)
    GIRLY GIRLS AND GIRLY BOYS: THE ANCESTRAL ROOTS OF MAN-THINK VERSUS FEM-THINK (PART I). June 22, 2004. Kent G. Bailey
    http://kentgbailey-paleopsychology.com/girly-6-7

    Liked by 1 person

  3. majorstar says:

    I noticed that the two written news sources I’ve viewed on this police shooting — MSN and The Charlotte Observer — have disabled comments for their stories. It appears they do not want anyone to interfere with the narrative they intend to present to their readers. The MSM really needs to be destroyed and rebuilt according to some fundamental journalistic principles. I’m sickened by what I’m seeing on the air and in print. These people are not our morality police nor our interpreters of events.

    Liked by 13 people

    • BillD3 says:

      I was taught, decades ago while in grade school, our press reported only the who, what, when and where.
      Today the colleges have added “why” – and they will tell you why according to their objectives, not a fact, but “as they see it”.
      Just the facts – that’s what the free press was all about. To ensure the public remained aware, informed. We are not informed, we are indoctrinated. Informed means knowing word-for-word exactly what a person said – in the original context. No words added, no words left out, and in the correct original order in which they were said.
      I can take them telling us “how” – if they know for a fact. How did the crook enter? Don’t guess because you saw an open window- only say how if there is proof or of the police told you based on forensic evidence.
      But please never try to tell us WHY.
      Now if a killer is captures, and he said “I did it because she cheated on me”, that’s different – that’s words direct from their mouth. But to say that “Trump said xxxxx because” is YOUR opinion, not a fact.
      If Ms. Clinton misses a rally because of illness, fine, but don’t say she was missing it due to illness unless SHE says so – or an AUTHORIZED member of her actual campaign staff said so on her approval. Don’t tell us “because she was sick” because some un-named volunteer or “anonymous source close to the campaign” said so – too often those are faked to make a point or to get the media to report something a certain way.
      If you can’t name the source or back them up with provable verifiable information, skip it, we don’t want to hear rumors and lies made up by disgruntled employees and people yapping that have no business opening their trap.
      Who, what, when and where. That’s it.
      Stop lying, stop manipulating- the USA media, the press here, is SOOO much like Russia used to be. I know – I worked with Russians who told me all about it. Germany and their government controlled media – just like USA and their DNC controlled media today.
      The Democrats are ticked because the media didn’t do their job and take Trump out earlier?
      Give me a break! And some call Trump fascist and like Hitler!

      This episode of the innocents being attacked and scared like this – what do these rioters think they are accomplishing? That’s being worse than those they say they are protesting against! They are doing this deliberately, and funny enough, all too often against OTHER BLACKS! Wow. Hitting your own race due to anger over a black person being killed.
      Real logical – you are actually driving a bigger wedge between us.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Jenny R. says:

        I have taught my freshmen (and high school) English composition and intro to literary analysis students that even “when, where, what, and how” can be manipulated in such a way as to create a bias in the mind’s of the reader.
        It’s really quite simply done, and can involve cold, hard facts…so they can’t be accused of lying.
        …and the media has been guilty of this for decades; in fact, of much more brazen things than this…there are clips from newspapers written in the 1800s that are so deplete of “objective reporting” that they could give the media now a run for their money

        There is nothing new under the sun, and the best a person can do is learn to defend oneself from falling for it (which can never probably be accomplished completely, as one can always find somewhere that will deliver the much desired confirmation bias..so “know thyself” holds true centuries after it was first spoken).

        Liked by 4 people

    • Perseus A. says:

      They are more like social engineers who’s ultimate goal is the extinction of white European descended people. The media (((owners))) need to be held accountable for inciting riots and violent attacks on white people. Of course (((they))) the media owners intend to sick their pets on whites because they are anti-white racists and white genocide wannabees.

      Liked by 1 person

    • nimrodman says:

      “Hands up” or not is not really the issue.

      If policewoman was commanding him “Stop – get on the f*cking ground” and he instead disobeyed by strolling back to his vehicle (where he may have had a weapon), then he was non-compliant and officer had reasonable fear for here life

      These characters are either too stupid to comprehend police commands and heed them, or they are willfully surly and non-compliant by disobeying. Either way, it’s a quick road to get dead.

      Liked by 14 people

      • nimrodman says:

        “her” life

        Like

        • robotech master says:

          Thats an impressive shift of how the law has always worked…. I guess I missed where they changed the law from “must reasonable fear for their life” to must obey all command issued both legal and illegal”.

          Or maybe it was i missed the change where “reasonable fear for your life” mean a person having their hands by their side.

          So when these changes took place do they apply to everyone or just cops tweaked out of their mind who should never have been able to get a job as a cop because they literally are afraid 24/7. Nothing shows bravery like shooting an unarmed person in the back…. when they’ve done nothing to you.

          Also real brave of those cops going out to save those people trapped by that mob… who were unarmed because of either laws cops demand disarming the public… or the disillusion view that the police will save them in an emergency.

          Like

          • As I was taught, do what the cop says. Period. Do not ignore them, do not do something else. Do what you are told, say yes sir, yes ma’am. If you don’t, best case scenario is you are arrested, worst case scenario I visit you in the hospital or morgue. My Dad was a cop. This was the message he gave to each of us as we turned 16. Boys and girls. We are a big family, we all turned 16 between 1981 and 1991. So nothing has changed if you were on the job. What has changed is you are now being told some semblence of the truth.

            Liked by 1 person

            • robotech master says:

              Yes all well and good. Completely and utterly missing both the point and the law.

              When your father told his daughter that did he include when i cops tell her to behind over the care and drop her pants or hitch her skirt… you father said do it right? When the cops says spread her cheeks and bit this stick your father said do it right? When the cop was done and said don’t say or report this to anyway your father said don’t report a thing right?

              People don’t like being threaten… people don’t like being abused. However what people like or dislike in the end doesn’t matter… what matters is the law and when cops clearly break the law they not only should be punished but be fought every step of the way. Your belief that cops can do no wrong and that you are required to behind over and take it is just as absurd as BLM belief that cops can do no right and they shouldn’t have to obey the law either.

              Like

          • dreadnok89 says:

            Please stop. You are stupid. If you dont like laws you don’t belong in a civilized society. Dude was on pvp the cop thought.

            Like

            • robotech master says:

              Lay off the drugs my friend… what a cop thinks and what a reasonable person thinks are becoming increasing distant. This was some back alley in the middle of the night when a cop is all alone… This is broad daylight, helos, others cops nearby, hospitals nearby, etc, etc, etc.

              Being drugged up doesn’t give police a kill at will pass…. ITS AGAINST THE LAW. The cops were/are just as tweaked out if not more so then most drug users they face because they are scared they may have to ball up and fight.

              You talk about the “law” but where in the law does it give cops the right to shoot people just because they(cops) piss their pants and/or the suspect refuses to obey their commands. Got news for you its not in there. The excuse these cops will use is they “feared for theirs lives”, “I thought he had a gun”. Try above, you shoot a cops because he puts his hand on his gun while talking to you… see how “you feared for your life” arguments works out for you. We are not supposed to have a two tiered justice system. Everyone is supposed to have the same investigation and rights. In a just society we would hold cops to a HIGHER standard then random citizens.

              They are supposed to be trained to act professional… they volunteer to confront this danger.
              Does the guy going to do some shopping to buy dinner volunteer to be robbed and stabbed that night?
              What about the woman who someone tries to rape?

              Yet those are the people held to a higher standard when they can use force… and they are denied access to the weapons to use said force… and who denies them that RIGHT? Dirty, corrupt cops…

              Like

              • nimrodman says:

                Dude, you’re throwing up straw men.

                Police-shooting victims aren’t shot because they don’t obey commands. That’s a complete straw-man proposition.

                They’re shot because failure to obey commands, willful confrontation or resistance, appearing to be reaching into a vehicle or waistband (or preparing to, such as closing the distance to a vehicle window), and various other actions (sometimes multiple actions in combination) alert police that they’re dealing with a potentially dangerous or irrational subject, possibly to the point of putting the officer in fear for his life or others’ lives in the vicinity.

                Escalation from unarmed subject to one who’s retrieved or drawn a weapon can occur rapidly, particularly if the officer allows continued non-compliance, like subject walking back to their vehicle against command.

                Here’s how it can end.

                Like

      • dalethorn says:

        Willful. Emergency situation. Shoot them.

        Like

      • alliwantissometruth says:

        Exactly nimrodman. That’s how 99% of these shootings play out

        Put yourself in the officers position. You’re telling someone to stop. That person knows you’re pointing a gun at him or her. They refuse to obey your commands. You’re in a highly defensive mindset. The person takes an action that could mean getting a weapon & firing on you

        What would you do? Who’s the one who’s put you both in a position where you or the perp can get shot? Why would anyone take that chance when it was the perp who put himself in that position to begin with?

        The hypocrisy is, 100% of the people “protesting” would have shot him sooner if they were in the same position as the officer

        Liked by 1 person

        • bobklahn says:

          If you have a gun aimed at someone and he continues to disobey your orders, then he takes an action that looks like getting a weapon, it’s called suicide by cop.

          There were 4 cops there, I bet that women did not even know they were there. She was so focused on her fear there was nothing but her fear and the target.

          Like

      • Dems B. Dcvrs says:

        “or they are willfully surly and non-compliant by disobeying”

        Arrogant to point of Death, comes to mind.
        Being “Uppity” can get you Under.

        Like

      • Tray says:

        So the police can fear imminent danger but not the black man with guns drawn on him? Compliance has proven to be deadly

        Like

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Did you all notice our favorite attorney Benjamin Crump is involved already?

      Liked by 4 people

  4. sDee says:

    Black Officer. Black Police Chief. Black Perpetrator.

    Racism is written all over this.

    Liked by 10 people

  5. GREENMIRROR says:

    Trump is exactly right Blacks are worse off now than ever, ever, ever before. In fact everyone is worse off than ever, ever, ever before.

    Now that we have put that to rest can we get on with Making America Great Again.

    Liked by 6 people

  6. 3x1 says:

    Truckers should have moved out as soon as the fires started:

    A tractor trailer can easily move small vehicles out of the way. Fires in stopped traffic represents a clear and immediate threat.

    Any vehicles blocking the highway were hopefully ID’ed and confiscated.

    Like

    • wyntre says:

      Where were they supposed to go? That pic shows gridlock.

      Like

      • Gary says:

        Straight ahead……That pic shows an obstruction, not gridlock.

        Liked by 3 people

      • psadie says:

        You keep moving and DO NOT STOP for the trucks can make a path so ALL folks can get out of danger! If they want to riot, incite violence, shoot, and hurt then they will pay the price for their folly.

        Liked by 4 people

        • aredtailblog says:

          I believe bowling right through the protestors was actually how they got BLM off the road and into malls the first time around, actually.

          Liked by 1 person

        • wyntre says:

          But that would require coordination among the dozens of truckers stopped. At least, the pic shows dozens of trucks.

          I’m just saying. I couldn’t care less if the vehicles blocking the road (and their owners) are damaged but it would seem that a few truck drivers initially stopped, causing the gridlock.

          Truck drivers in the U.S. are beginning to experience similar conditions to those in Calais.

          It is friggin’ dangerous. That poor women driver who was trapped in her cab – wonder what happened to her.

          Liked by 3 people

        • wyntre says:

          Why don’t they do that in Calais?

          Like

  7. Moishe Pipik says:

    The facts are, according to the latest news, that a black officer shot a black suspect who had a gun.

    The story you hear on social media is that a white office shot a man who was carrying a book.

    Facts don’t matter anymore.

    Liked by 7 people

  8. Neural says:

    These are not “protestors”. These are domestic terrorists, and they need to be treated as such. Every last person that was blocking that highway needs to be in jail for a minimum of a year.

    Liked by 8 people

    • H.V says:

      Policemen have to go back to the days when they used rubber bullets. They have policemen acting like pussies. This is endangering all of our people. Those thugs act like baboons. These are not protest, they are riots. In my lifetime and I’m 50 years old, I have never seen such anarchy in the United States. The truckers should just had moved and if one gets run over, well they are just defending their lives.

      Liked by 3 people

      • dayallaxeded says:

        Police should go back to rock-salt loaded shotguns and rounding up non-human-behaving hominids with rope and nets, as one would do with any wild animal. Rubber bullets are too expensive and too ineffective. Water canons are pretty good, too, but it’s a shame to waste perfectly good water on these scum.

        Liked by 2 people

    • dalethorn says:

      Chain gang, fixing highways. We have some good sheriffs who can get them supervision.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. Summer says:

    I am sick and tired of these staged violent protests. Obama & Sons managed to unleash an ugly racial war, next we can expect Martial Law and massive gun confiscations among law abiding citizens. That’s what he is aiming at.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. TheVelvetKitten says:

    Check here for photographers pictures. Really good photo coverage.

    If you check the comments under the images at the rear of the truck with cargo burning..one guy proudly claims that he is in that pic. Dig deeper and it turns out he works for a medical company. Let that sink in that this person takes care of ill patients. Maybe somebody can make him famous..I mean seeing as he is so proud of terrorizing truckers who were out there just doing their jobs.

    Liked by 7 people

  11. psadie says:

    These flash mobs appear at just the right time via social media and Soros. The truckers need to ban together and instead of stopping when they see rioting or they begin to riot they should PLOW THROUGH the crowds and if they don’t move then they are dead…END OF THE STORY. No one should have to be in a situation that endangers their lives when they CAN do something about it!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Kent says:

      I’m AMAZED that did not happen…if the trailer is empty or lightly loaded a quick pull on the fifth wheel latch, drive out from under it a get the uh-huh outta dodge….just leave the trailer there and the tractor alone weighs +15,000# ….the acceleration is pretty darn good when bobtailing.

      Just amazed it didn’t happen….I think the contrast between the behavior of the victims and that of the rioters is startling.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. redlegleader68 says:

    An in related news …

    Terance Crutcher Just Finished 9 Year Sentence For Drug Trafficking, Prior Convictions For Resisting Arrest and Had Active Warrants…

    http://www.weaselzippers.us/296470-terance-crutcher-just-finished-9-year-sentence-for-drug-trafficking-had-prior-convictions-for-resisting-arrest/

    Liked by 5 people

  13. Briana says:

    To be frank, only involuntary sterilization will reduce the population of low IQ sociopaths. It’s time.

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Patrumpsupporter says:

    Scott, convicted of “misdemeanor” assault with a deadly weapon, assault on a child, assault on a woman, dui. Momma says ” family man, likeable person, loved his wife and children.” I hope they put the daughter on all the news shows. Make her famous. Maybe she’ll lie to the police.

    Like

    • JohnP says:

      Speaking on behalf of the Scott family in a press conference, a woman identified as Annette Albright emphasized that “what he’s done in the past is not relevant.”

      I have noticed that several news outlets have now added quotation marks around the word disabled when mentioning Scott.

      Like

      • Dems B. Dcvrs says:

        Annette Albright emphasized that “what he’s done in the past is not relevant.”

        That is where Annette and I vehemently disagree. If someone in past has assaulted people, then Police when dealing with that person have every justification to factor that in.

        Like

        • Panzerakc says:

          If what someone has done in the past is not relevant, then all these stories about “what good boys who never did anything wrong” these miscreants were need to stop.

          Like

  15. kinthenorthwest says:

    They need to start arresting, , jailing and fining them, instead of just watching….Yes there area areas and times that there area too many but if they just started throwing them into paddy wagons group by group….The ones who area blocking traffic, burning and looting Arrestin and fining the ones that they actually see committing a crime.

    Liked by 2 people

    • flounder, rebel, vulgarian, deplorable says:

      Nets. Large rocket propelled nets.

      Heck, in the city, you could just deploy them by gravity from the rooftops.

      Time for kid gloves is at an end, before a large number get shot or run over by a twitchy National Guardsman or CDL driver.

      Liked by 3 people

      • dayallaxeded says:

        ^^This^^exactly^^! Either encircle them or launch nets over the crowds. Doesn’t have to be a lot–strong monofilament gill nets would be sufficient, maybe even preferable, since the dumbazzes would get so tangled up in it, they’d all just fall down. Then send in the scoop.

        An old friend who did confidential DOD work in some dicey places was provided anti-kidnapping training. One of the main instructions was to always think of your vehicle as your first and biggest defense weapon. Keep moving when threatened or attacked and use the vehicle against armed attackers. Even if the vehicle is damaged, keep going as long as you can to try to get to help or a defensible position. Do not get out of the vehicle unless there is NO choice. Obviously, there were a lot more details, but that’s the salient drift.

        This blocking roadways and attacking vehicles has become a routine strategy, b/c they’re getting away with it. When trucks and cars refuse to stop, b/c that’s the only way they can stop or escape the threats of violence against the drivers/passengers, these idiotic riots will also stop. They are criminal cowards and opportunists, not patriots or revolutionaries. As I’ve often said, if these fools who love to parade around screaming for anarchy ever get their wishes, I’m going to be thoroughly amused as they reap the whirlwind of real anarchy.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Dems B. Dcvrs says:

        Got to disagree. It is time to stop placating these Rioters.
        When a Rioter is seen doing anything that could potentially harm an innocent, shoot the Rioter – dead.

        Like

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        H3LLL the word is out go do whatever you want and the police would do anything to you,

        Like

  16. Sam says:

    The cops are unable or unwilling to use tear gas or firehoses on rioting, potentially murderous thugs? Because said thugs are black? And there’s a black man as president and a black attorney general who want riots and racial mayhem committed against cops and non-blacks? We’re headed toward South Africa’s fate if this continues.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. beaujest says:

    NFL commish Goodell is proud of these folks acting out ! It is their right !

    Like

  18. wodiej says:

    First of all, you never, ever get out of your vehicle when the police pull you over. NEVER. When they approach your car you should have your hands on the steering wheel where they can see them. I have no idea what happened that prompted him to exit his vehicle but then he went back to his car after police told him to stop. He had a criminal record including altercations with the police which I’m sure they knew. But since they saw no weapon I’m not convinced they needed to shoot him. Why didn’t they just taser him?

    Like

  19. Poupon Marx says:

    Rubber bullets, after fair warning. Any attempt at bodily or property damage, rioting, shoot to hurt and maim. Then drag them to the Meat Wagon and off to jail. That’s all. And if they shoot live rounds at the police, then open fire with the same.

    “Weakness invites and encourages aggression”- Patrick Swayze quoting what is a Law of Nature.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dems B. Dcvrs says:

      Forget the fair warning. The gasing, tazing, rubber bullets when dealing with Rioters is submission to them.

      The message needs to be Consistent, Solid, and Clear. If you Riot, you face very real likelihood of being Shot dead.

      A Civilized Society should not suffer because of a few Anarchists or Violent Radicals.

      To be clear, I differentiate between:
      1) Peaceful Assembly (Free Speech as protected by Constitution)
      2) Protesting (verbal threats, vandalism, civil disobedience)
      3) Rioting (arson, violent assault, mass looting & robbery, gang rape, murder, damage to buildings, trashing of vehicles)

      Liked by 2 people

  20. Certain ethnic groups are known for certain activities, whether they live in Haiti, or Zimbabwe, Sweden or the inner cities of America. At some point we need to realize this is just their nature and stop blaming them.

    Like

    • that’s incredibly racist.

      Like

      • dayallaxeded says:

        Racism or Realism? Let empirical, observable facts over time and space decide.

        That said, never judge individuals by a group–rather, set your own level of caution by reasonable, fact-based general rules, then fine tune based on particular circumstances and observations. No matter what racial/ethnic group you’re in, there will be a sizeable number of folks in your same racial/ethnic group who are vipers and scum and a sizeable number who are very very good people. Discernment–we all need to use it and our gummint needs to get some.

        Like

  21. Dems B. Dcvrs says:

    “North Carolina Mob Attack Female Truck Driver – Police Refuse to Help”

    Whilst, Anti-gunners (Obama, Holder, Schummer, Lynch, Feinstein, Pelosi, …) insists We the People don’t need guns to protect ourselves.

    Never mind FACT that even well Armed Police were attacked and injured, along with being so intimidated as to Refuse to help and Innocent.

    Like

  22. Linda Ruth says:

    Remember the recent news reports about Federal agencies buying large quantities of guns and ammo? What if the purpose was to arm hate-filled ethnic groups who swarm and harm like savages on the rampage? They have been armed to shoot back at anyone shooting at them. But only capably armed law enforcement can go out to control the savage hoards bent on violence. And if violence is their “nature” then rounding them up and incarcerating them will have to be done. Don’t like the idea of concentration prison camps; then be prepared to fight in a Commie revolution. The savages have been instilled with murdering hatred for generations. “Lawful living,” they disdainfully proclaim is “White Privilege,” and is not for ethnic freedom of savagery. Just be aware of the thousands of militant immigrants being brought into America and being forced into law-abiding communities, just like is happening in Europe. These along with already present, rioting, America-hating “citizens.”
    J. FARAH: WHY IS GOVERNMENT STOCKPILING GUNS, AMMO?
    Exclusive: Joseph Farah examines Obama’s plan for ‘civilian national security force’
    Published: 02/03/2013 at 3:01 PM
    http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-stockpiling-guns-ammo/

    Like

    • Wendy says:

      I would not call them regular civilians. More likely drug cartel gansters. They already have the organizations ready to go. Free weapons on taxpayers money is a bonus.

      Like

  23. Joel J Johnson says:

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article103212447.html

    A bio on Brent Vinson, the peace officer who fired the shot in Charlotte. Sounds like a great Christian. Team captain in football at Liberty University

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Joel J Johnson says:

    The peace officer who fired the shot in Charlotte. Sounds like a great Christian. Team captain in football at Liberty University.

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article103212447.html

    Like

  25. ryanomalley1 says:

    3 words: Shoot. On. Sight.

    Like

  26. Bernice Shifflett says:

    We need to PRAY for Almighty God to HELP America!!!! People need to get down on our knees and ask God to turn this Country around.I believe this is just what our President wants TURMOIL so he and his Muslim family can try to take America by surprise!!WAKE up America !!!!!!!!!

    Like

    • Perseus A. says:

      God helps those who help themselves. Whites need to stop allowing these anti-white racists like Hillary, 99% of blacks, and ( ( (others) ) ) attack white people with impunity.

      Like

  27. pochas94 says:

    When an economic enterprise such as news organizations gets to a certain size, ossification sets in. Journalists stop reporting on what is happening and start reporting what their wealthy superiors want to hear, and that is what allows them to secure their position as wealth accumulators. To fix this with government regulation would be a cure worse than the disease. The solution is creative destruction. Boycott the offenders. Get your news elsewhere. Democracy is a bitch, it just works better than anything else that’s been tried. We need to keep it.

    Like

  28. Major Styles says:

    I am not sure if Fonzie jumped the shark or if Obama did. At this point, I think it’s the latter.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s