Hillary Clinton Says “Bombings In New York” – 40 Seconds Later Criticizes Use of Word “Bombing”…

In under a minute you can see/hear an audio visual demonstration showing why the vast majority of Americans just laugh at journalists in the 2016 presidential campaign.

dopey-clinton

A well sedated Secretary Clinton begins her remarks (00:28) by saying:

“I’ve been briefed about the bombings in New York and New Jersey, as well as the attack in Minnesota”…

Note the emphasis: “briefed about the bombings“.

However, seemingly oblivious to the fact Secretary Clinton just said “bombings“, Hillary’s traveling press pool asks the very first question 40 seconds later (01:08) which was:

“Do you have any reaction to the fact that Donald Trump, prior to taking the stage tonight, called the explosion tonight a bomb, and if that’s an appropriate term”?

Watch below:

These MSM dolts are so dependent on collaborated and scripted narratives, they can’t even stop themselves from following the script when it makes them look silly.

.

.

.

humor-in-nature8  humor-in-nature8  humor-in-nature8

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, media bias, Occupy Type Moonbats, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

681 Responses to Hillary Clinton Says “Bombings In New York” – 40 Seconds Later Criticizes Use of Word “Bombing”…

  1. TatonkaWoman says:

    I once had a potato chip bag explode in my car while I was driving. Seriously. Almost caused an accident. So I am going with the exploding potato chip bag theory. Just think about how many potato chip bags you find in dumpsters. Of course…..most of those are empty…but, hey, its as good as what you are hearing by these silly talking heads on TV.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Ace says:

    Back in the 90s and before they could get away with Soviet style “reporting”. For some reason, it has yet to dawn on them that those days are long gone.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Sparky5253 says:

    Is she drugged out, or drunk?

    Liked by 4 people

  4. georgiafl says:

    Cuomo is sending 1000 National Guard to NYC

    Like

  5. wyntre says:

    All FIVE bombs that were found in the New York area used flip phones as a detonator: Fears of link between Jersey and Manhattan attacks grows

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3795654/Old-fashioned-flip-phones-five-explosive-devices-used-Saturday-related.html#ixzz4KeQtPXcg

    Like

  6. JAN says:

    If she becomes President, somebody will need to give her a No Doz if we have a national emergency after 10:00!

    Like

  7. Azrajo says:

    Have some pity, the poor thing just does not remember. She is all drugged out.

    Like

  8. dayallaxeded says:

    They really poured on the makeup for this-probably used a whole tin of rouge. They’re not even trying or can’t make it look natural anymore.

    Like

  9. Pepperjelly says:

    Seriously, WHAT is going on with this woman’s neck? Ladies, Physicians, any ideas?


    Liked by 1 person

    • Mike says:

      It’s a semi-hidden lining where technicians can remove her head when she needs hardware replacements and upgrades.

      Like

    • rsanchez1990 says:

      In my unprofessional non-medical opinion, looks like creasing from how often her head jerks forward and back during her seizures.

      Like

    • bluesky says:

      I see a lot of elderly people with wrinkly necks. the issue is the contrast between her face and her neck. Hillary is wearing a lot of makeup and probably has had some nip & tucks & botox especially around her eyes. She has aged tremendously since 2008.

      Like

    • justfactsplz says:

      The redness appears to me to be that they tried to hide a scar in the line of her neck. Also her cheeks are lumpy looking. Her hands have a bluish cast to them. Hillary is not one bit healthy.

      Like

  10. If you look at historical pictures of many of the witches from Salem they had identical markings. They also shared the same type of personality traits as well as a lack of vocabulary to express themselves properly. As they were not politically correct for the time they invited them to a cook out. They just didn’t tell them they were on the menu…..

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Jakealope says:

    anyone thinks the Buddhists are behind it or the Amish?

    Like

  12. rsanchez1990 says:

    You know what’s worse, is the media is using very deceptive editing in reporting Trump’s and Clinton’s responses. I’m watching the local news, and they’re running a national ABC News segment on the bombings. They say how Trump called the attacks a bombing before they were confirmed as such by the authorities (well duh, what else is going to explode, potato chip bags??), and took the clip from Hillary’s interview and edited it to create a contrast that suggests Hillary is more measured in her reactions (well, heavy sedation will do that for ya), only showing the part where she says we need to “know the facts”, and not the part where she actually calls the attacks bombings.

    An earpiece isn’t even necessary when she will get coached to give a pre-planned response right on camera to provide a favorable sound bite! They’ll just edit it away afterwards, just like they did when Bill said that Hillary frequently faints.

    Like

  13. bluesky says:

    I have an interesting observation that is by no means scientific

    I’m an avid reader of online articles & blogs, including liberal sites, and I always go to comments section. Being a numbers person, I always note the support %’s based on up or down arrows. I’ve been watching the arrow trend for the last year. The %’s for pro-Trump arrows have steadily increased even when an article is bias against Trump.

    For the past few months at the Daily Mail, the Hillbots have been grossly manipulating the arrows so percentages cant be tracked unless you look at newer comments that haven’t been arrow trolled. Tonight, there is an article about Hillary’s press conference about the NYC bombing. Looking at the newer comments for the past couple of hours have Hillary support at about 2% based on the arrow percentages. This is a complete collapse of support for Hillary since the convention based on up/down votes of comments.

    I’ve noticed the same trend on the comment sections on other sites included liberal articles Atlantic, Politico and others that usually are trending on Real Clear Politics.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Pingback: Manhattan explosion… | Time for Thorns

  15. moe ham head says:

    im sure when she says victims she mean the poor little muslimes
    so she calls her smelly buddy bill de blasio so they can coordinate their lies

    Like

  16. Ej says:

    She is on drugs, completely sedated. We need to make a big deal out of this. Maybe she was like this when they called about Ambassador Stevens. Maybe she was too sedated to think!

    She couldn’t pass a field sobriety test right there. She is smashed on meds.

    Like

  17. AghastInFL says:

    I thought this was interesting, but then I didn’t follow the earlier incident to fruition…
    Could the Central Park bomb in July be related?:

    Like

  18. freepetta says:

    Poor poor Hillie she doesn’t even know what she’s talking about any more:

    http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/09/bill-clintons-longtime-pal-hillary-losing-her-mental-capabilities/?AID=7236

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s