Egypt: U.S. Explanation of State Department Meeting With Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists “not understandable”…

There is a jaw-dropping level of hypocrisy inherent within the U.S. State Department hosting the Muslim Brotherhood when you contrast the anxiety expressed by the White House to a speech by Benjamin Netanyahu.

If the White House is upset over an open speech that Benjamin Netanyahu will deliver to congress, imagine how angry Egypt’s president al-Sisi feels knowing the Muslim Brotherhood is in closed meetings with U.S. officials.

ann patterson egypt

CAIRO: The reasons for a meeting between former Freedom and Justice Party members and U.S. State Department officials are “not understandable,” said Foreign Minister Sameh Shokry in Addis Ababa Saturday.

U.S. State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki said Thursday in the daily briefing that a delegation of “former FJP members” organized by Georgetown University, adding it was “ routine at the State Department as they meet political party leaders from across the world,” and that the group did not discuss the ouster of former president Mohamed Morsi.

Shokry told Egyptian media Saturday that any kind of communication with group affiliated in “terrorist attacks is not understandable, as they are not political party, and according o the Egyptian law that should be treated as a terrorist group.”

Shokry said that terrorism does not only include ISIS or Boko Haram, but also all “groups that aim to destroy and kill.”

The Muslim Brotherhood, as well as its political wing the Freedom and Justice Party, were dissolved in late 2013 by the Egyptian government; the ruling criminalized any association or membership with the group, and also authorized the government to seize its assets. (read more)

Egypt Freedom Loss 2

This entry was posted in Agitprop, Conspiracy ?, Death Threats, Dem Hypocrisy, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Islam, Jihad, media bias, North Africa, propaganda, Secretary of State, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

52 Responses to Egypt: U.S. Explanation of State Department Meeting With Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists “not understandable”…

  1. justfactsplz says:

    How much does it take before Congress and all of the American people realize that Obama is part of the muslim brotherhood? They are the ones that are really his people, not the blacks.

    Liked by 9 people

  2. kihn says:

    That’s about as PC as it gets. Give a sorry excuse for unacceptable behavior and it must be accepted because….polite… To seriously question the amateur press detail would be tantamount to breaking protocol and calling them liars. Racism. Sexism. Cards would be pulled out. Anything but answering legitimate questions.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Paul H. Lemmen says:

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.


  4. RJ says:

    Keep in mind that the closest person to Hillary Clinton is Huma…wife of Anthony Weiner and a woman whose family are members of the Muslim Brotherhood. Couple this with the Iranian history of Valerie Jarrett and the early upbringing of B. Hussein in the muslim world, you just might have a moment where “doubt as to who is who” rises to the surface of your thoughts.

    Unimaginable that Americans could be fooled into electing a person who does not have America’s best interests for president…right? Could never happen, right? Impossible, right? Outlandish paranoid thinking, right?

    Ok, I’ll wait till this game plays out. Right now, my bet is the enemy is within our national political system’s upper levels, right into 1600 Penn. Ave at the White House, under Michelle’s nose and in her bed.

    My apologies will be ready if wrong. Till then my advice would be to stay locked and loaded keeping five yards apart, so to speak.

    Think how charming the serial killer Ted Bundy was, so charming even a judge said he could have made a fine lawyer. He too had a big smile…

    Liked by 10 people

    • MaryfromMarin says:

      Would like to give multiple “likes” on this, RJ. Spot on.

      Liked by 3 people

    • “Doubt as to who is who”

      Not really much doubt left, imho

      Liked by 5 people

    • BertDilbert says:

      I am trying to think how exactly the US behaviour makes any sence. I am starting to think that the plan is to create civil unrest around the world creating non competitive dependants. Countries can be destroyed by regular war or civil war from within. Political instability promotes capital flight and lack of investment due to political conditions.

      Liked by 1 person

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        I think you are onto something, from the viewpoint of the Democrat party, is one only adds the maxim of “follow the money”.

        Baseline Dem behavior is to match policymaking with investments that are several dominos down the line – far enough into the future that they make money on the anticipated change, and then are pulled out and safe from either scrutiny or failure by the time reality collides with “Solyndra” or “global warming military readiness” (mega-cough). Combine that with the fact that nonsensical policies and nonsensical investments that benefit from them are extremely hard to link in investigative practice, and even harder to link in media blame, and you have an irresistible opportunity for malevolent Democrat policy.

        Short version – George Soros and Clinton, Inc. surely made money on the Arab Spring. Soros and Obama probably lost money thanks to Al Sisi and Bibi, and they are not happy.

        Liked by 1 person

    • kathyca says:

      Is there doubt? Was there doubt? We knew who this person was from day one based on his associations alone. I’ve been saying it since then and no one was listening. This site saved my sanity ❤

      Liked by 2 people

      • Agreed, kathy, regarding this site (as well as 1 or 2 others I’ve stumbled across over the last few years) and sanity.
        I could not – and still can’t – believe that ANYONE would EVER vote for a candidate from Chicago given the sordid history of Chicago politics alone, regardless of who the candidate was/is.

        I was on every blog I could find attempting to make known the nefarious way in which Obama was even able to run for his Senate campaign, as well as his associations (Rezko, Blago, Jarrett, Ayers, etc).
        I could not believe the amount of willful ignorance I was up against


    • cali says:

      You are absolutely correct – and as those with eyes to see and ears to hear – this administration has places throughout their term – sensitive national security positions= staffed with stealth muslim brotherhood agents.
      This current meeting that took place recently has already resulted in declaring ‘jihad’ against Egypt and al-Sisi specifically going so far to place a ‘hit’ on Sisi.
      Morsi’s trial due in May – this administration is running out of time to prevent morsi form attempting to save his own neck by divulging the truth about what really happen.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Roy says:

      Excellent comment.

      We have a radical Moslem terrorist cell in the WH and supporting actors throughout the government.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. yakmaster2 says:

    Hilary Clinton was corrupt as Obama’s syncophantic mouthpiece. In the instances where she did exerted herself to influence Obama’s acquiescence toward any world policy, she was tragically wrong. I hope enough of her character is revealed during the 2016 election cycle for voters to see how fatally flawed she’d be as President.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. geoffb5 says:

    With Hamas dropping Egypt as their mediator with Israel maybe the Brotherhood is going to be the new one and the talks are about that.


    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Interesting. I can see how all the bad guys could benefit from your suggested scenario. It’s very “Jarrett”. The careerists at State think they’re doing their usual good thing. But cunning saboteurs Jarrett and Obama can use it to simultaneously rehabilitate the MB, delegitimize Al Sisi, and hurt Israel either way by giving them a Sophie’s choice of legitimizing a friend’s enemy or letting Obama further isolate them. Bad guys win – good guys lose – what’s not for the evil Chicago Clique to love?


  7. davidfarrar says:

    I am 99% with you guys. It’s that last 1%. The same 1% I assume faced all other non-Muslim civilizations for 14 centuries. Is Obama trying to sabotage our security and is cahoots with the Muslim Brotherhood to sabotage the Egyptian’s as well; or is trying the break the cycle by bring the two sides together?

    Liked by 1 person

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      HOPE is the bait. CHANGE is never, ever, what you hoped for. That is how Obama works. Every. Single. Time.


      • smiley says:

        “hope” and “change” are old communists word games….”code” words in the old narrative.

        if you get a chance, you might like to read “Witness”, by Whitaker Chambers (about the Alger Hiss trial and Chamber’s eloquent and soulful story of his own experience within the communist party, and his rejection of it)….good read…Chambers was a beautiful writer.


      • davidfarrar says:

        The biggest problem I see is there really no established way for “peaceful” Muslims to back out of their enslavement to the violent passages of the Qur’an; is there?


    • Bring together?
      Do you seriously believe there is a benevolent side to Obama /Jarrett & co?
      Or are you thinking they are trying to bring together to then tear down?

      I don’t understand your 1% concern.


  8. bofh says:

    Is Obama trying to sabotage our security and is cahoots
    with the Muslim Brotherhood to sabotage the Egyptian’s
    as well; or is trying the break the cycle by bring the two sides together?

    Neither. He’s a Transnational Progressive. Religion is not his thing (think “New World Order”). Barky is not about to interrupt his golf games to get down on the floor and pray to Mecca or anywhere else, and the Mooch isn’t going into a burka quietly. But we’re scroomed, just the same.

    Good article:

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Anton says:

    More and more details continue to emerge about Hillary’s role in Benghazi, and the fact that the war waged against Gaddafi was a) unnecessary and b) had led to catastrophic conditions in Libya (civil war, anarchy). And the State Department is up to it again, assisting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to destabilize the government and remove El-Sisi from power. Unbelievable.

    Admirals, generals: Pentagon tapes indict Hillary

    The Muslim Brotherhood Calls For “A Long, Uncompromising Jihad” In Egypt After Meeting With US State Department

    Muslim Brotherhood at State Department/Violence in Egypt


  10. czarowniczy says:

    Where’s the &^%$#@* surprise? This @#$%^&&* Administration’s done whatever it can to CYA Moslem terrorists at home and abroad. Qatar’s putting it’s ass on the line to host THE US’s major military Hq in the Mideast and is trying to figure out why the US won’t put two organizations with questionable bran offices in the US on a terrorist list that Qatar, after a lot of in-house intel work, has put on its. The Mideast saw the mess that Obama left when we left Iraq, a mess that’s left thousands of Moslem and Christian casualties in its wake. They’re all trying to figure out how the US, the world’s most powerful nation just a decade ago, could elect this incompetent joke of an 90s sitcom clown into a position he couldn’t occupy in a video game, and how he could so deteriorate our position and destabilize the world in just 6 short years. Get in line Egypt, and when your new Russian landlords start moving in – ask them.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. sheila says:

    I’d like to see someone with a big megaphone – Trump comes to mind – ask why the press touts Obama’s time in Indonesia as the basis for his expertise all things muslim. He was there first through fourth grades! Left when he was 10! It’s time to begin humiliating this guy. And the press.


    • Burnt Toast says:

      Those are the formative years.

      That said, ever watched “The Year of Living Dangerously”?
      That is when mamma took Barry there.


    • BitterC says:

      To that point, humiliating Peace Prize. IIRC, Killary, Zero and the other couple early contneders started THEIR campaigns end of 2006. 2007-8 was non stop Bush bashing. The fact he will still be empowered to drag this country further down throughout 2015 into 2016 is proof positive of media bias if anyone had any doubts.


  12. Shibbity Boo says:

    This really has nothing to do with religion, or stamps in a passport. It’s simply the way of Good Government(TM). Public statements, public promises – especially those that may end up recorded – are tools of Enemies of The State(TM).


  13. beaujest says:

    “Occam’s Razor” !


  14. shipley130 says:

    Not understanding and not accepting the truth are two different things.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s