NataLIE Jackson Accuses Zimmerman Defense Team of “Racism” – However, Lets Looksee How RACIST Ms. Jackson Actually Is…. (NO_LIMIT_NUTTER Responds)

Such is the current state of racial anxiety in this nation of ours.   In this example we’ll show you how incredibly racist the Trayvon Martin family attorney’s actually are;   Specifically, Natalie Jackson.

Francis Olivernatalie Jackson

Now, it’s important to keep in mind as you review these words, that Natalie Jackson is the daughter of well known Black Activist, and NAACP agitator, Francis Oliver. Francis Oliver has described Natalie’s upbringing thusly:

“I’ve been fighting white people my whole life seems like,” said Oliver. Of her daughter Natalie, Oliver said, “I raised her on the front lines of the movement.” (link)

So Trayvon family attorney, and daughter of Francis “fight white people” Oliver, Natalie Jackson, tweets this recently:

Natalie Jackson racist Then follows up by doubling down on her own racism:

Ms. Natalie “raised to fight white people” Jackson – has the nerve to accuse George Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara of racism merely for sharing discovery of Trayvon Martin smoking dope, holding a gun, talking bragging about fighting, and in general presenting himself as somewhat of a young, immoral and valueless thug.

Now let’s flash back to April 11th 2012, the date Natalie and the rest of the Martin Family crew of attorney’s were giddy with glee because they convinced State Attorney Angela Corey to charge George Zimmerman based on the claims of the Martin Family attorney’s new found “ear-witness”, Witness #8.

Specifically, what was taking place in/around her AME Church in support of her endeavors.    Please Note the flyer on the phone pole outside of Natalie Jackson, and Francis Oliver’s church:  Allen Chapel AME Baptist church – (Reverend Valarie J Henry): 

boycott

“Boycott All White Businesses Owned Here In Sanford Florida”

Thanks to Disgustedwithjulison you can see pictures of the outside of their celebratory event HERE – and you can see pictures of Natalie Jackson’s Mom, Francis Oliver, inside the Church HERE.

Setting aside the ridiculous framing that George Zimmerman was “white”, which he is not (he’s Latino/ Black, and white by ethnicity ), what exactly would you call such a position –    “Boycott all white businesses owned here in Sanford Florida” – if not racist?

Benjamin+Crump+Trayvon+Martin+Parents+React+RhDFIkn0l3Ml

You see, the entire construct of the Trayvon Martin shooting was created around a racist narrative.   A narrative created ONLY to afford a better selling media hook.   A narrative created by and sold by the same person now accusing the Zimmerman defense team of racism, Natalie Jackson.

Benjamin Crump 2 Sharpton-JacksonGeorge Zimmerman was arrested because the black community, the professional Black Grievance Industry, demanded he be arrested based on the color of his skin.

If it were not a demand based on skin color, then why would the skin color of the local business owners be an issue?

“RACISM” – A hatred or intolerance of another race or other races, based on ethnicity or skin color.   Abusive or aggressive behavior towards members of another race on the basis of such a belief.

boycott

“I’ve been fighting white people my whole life seems like,” said Oliver. Of her daughter Natalie, Oliver said, “I raised her on the front lines of the movement.” (link)

ANY QUESTIONS?

Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump

Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump

Nah?…..  

…… I Didn’t Think So !

This entry was posted in BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Cultural Marxism, Mark O'Mara, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Racism, Trayvon Martin, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

61 Responses to NataLIE Jackson Accuses Zimmerman Defense Team of “Racism” – However, Lets Looksee How RACIST Ms. Jackson Actually Is…. (NO_LIMIT_NUTTER Responds)

  1. eastern2western says:

    these people bring in every civil rights group in the country to inflame this case, but they never admitted they called Zimmerman a racist. sure, what ever.

    Like

  2. dmoseylou says:

    Unsolicited advice for NatJack

    Like

    • libby says:

      Let us keep in mind that certain entertainers were ATTACKED by the likes of ms nataLIE for being SELLOUTS (by making music that entertains all races rather than music designed solely to entertain the AA community)

      Like

  3. Lou says:

    calling another a racist is just another strategy to shut the conversation down. this is NatJack’s tactic. If all else fails, just scream that showing the pictures is racist. only baby pics are allowed because those aren’t racist.

    Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      Unless the high courts put a stop to this unethical, unprofessional, immoral, conduct by Florida attorneys, the court will never be able to conduct a trial on the merits of the facts. All trials with mixed race juries will be hung on racial conflicts.

      Like

  4. robcar says:

    Not being as well versed in this case, I am wondering if Sharpton and Jessie Jackson have made any statements regarding this case recently? If they are silent, that can’t be good for the prosecution.

    Like

  5. boutis says:

    Ms Jackson sent out tweets “warning” (maybe construed as threatening) media legal analysts not to discuss the defense reciprocal discovery which is REQUIRED to be submitted by the defense. I hope these lawyer analysts got a taste of what MOM and West have been experiencing for the past year. She also started back peddling trying to claim the furor she and her co-conspirators concocted was not directed at GZ personally (demanding an arrest) but at the somehow racist SPD for conducting an investigation that did not involve arresting an innocent man fast enough. Her rabble rousing and campaign of misinformation is catching up with her.

    Like

    • cboldt says:

      The material on the phone is state’s evidence, and should have been produced to the defense. This is the subject of O’Mara’s third motion for sanctions. The means that the state used to prevent publication of this discovery material in the form of photos and text messages was to withhold it from the defense.

      Natalie Jackson’s credibility may be taking a temporary hit, but I don’t think this damages her armor at all. Political Correctness is a powerful force.

      Like

      • boutis says:

        The only way a case of any kind held together was by the SP committing outrageous discovery violations. From the beginning when they had GZ “arrested” to appease the mob stirred up by plaintiff’s lawyers for the scam, they knew they had no case. I still believe that it was supposed to be a quick charge, plea for much lesser charges, no defense (and no exposure of the truth), a couple of years in prison, a few million for Crump, and crisis averted (with the idiot governor and state attorney general as heroes) and Florida not burned out. Everyone wins but GZ who was supposed to be terrorized into taking one for the team. Now everyone’s neck is on the block. The craven stupidity of it all is amazing.

        Like

      • myopiafree says:

        Hi Cboldt –
        The STATE’s HIDING the content of the Cell-phone for so long – is indeed a intentional crime. If this had been “first discovery”, 12 months ago – at the Grand Jury – this case would have ended at that point – when they figured out that DeeDee was lying though her teeth.

        Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      For the appointment of the SP the SPD must be shown to be racist. That is why SP was appointed. If the SPD was not racist, why the SP?

      Like

    • libby says:

      Dont forget nataLIE how SLOW the roll is when a black perosn kills another black person (or a white person).
      In the FAMU hazing incident, it took many months to get an arrest, but when black people kill felow black people, there is no hurry to arrest anyone.
      How many signs were posted instructing folks to avoid doing business at black owned businesses? The nice thing about a good race hoax is it reminds folks what is the good kind of hate the lame stream media is in support of. The LSM is very much in support of black racism (they clearly think it to be the good kind of hate that shall never be questioned).
      The last time there was a major court appearence, i recall MOM being interviewed for HLN afterwards. He tells the interviewer that there is black racism that has been revealed in this case (not a direct quote, more of a paraphrase). Does the interviewer stop him and question him about what is this black racism? hecks to the no….move on, next, next, move on, nothign to see here folks…..The news media is well aware of black raicsm. The reason the news media is so deaf, dumb, and blind to black racism is because they are big time supporters of it. That wouldnt be so bad if they would openly admit how much they are in suport of black racism, but they are slippery and trying to be sly (they arent-they are transparent-at least to me-having been raised in communist household has its advantages on some days of the week-I can spot their nonsense from a mile away in a thick fog-I can smell their horse manure coming out of their mouth while they tell me it tastes great-sorry, you wont get me to swallow that).

      Like

  6. Sha says:

    Nat is a sad little soul who has been taught by her mom that for what ever reason her skin color makes her less than another skin color or at some kind of disadvantage. What her mom should have been teaching her is, people are good and people are bad , life isn’t always fair and the world doesn’t owe any of us anything. It always saddens my heart to see a sweet little face that doesn’t have a clue about race being raised by a hate filled human being……..

    Like

    • libby says:

      I hear nataLIE is a veteran of our armed forces (I feel sorry for anyone who had to serve with her). I imagine she had an interesting time in the armed services (I also imagine she made a lot of accusations of racism in her days in the armed forces-makes one wonder how many reports of racism she turned during her stint in the armed forces-judging by how racist and hateful she is now-she must have plenty of ‘friends’ in the armed forces who could report on how hateful she was during that part of her life). Did she have just one race card for her work in the armed forces or did she need more than one since the first one got so worn out?
      Sha, could you imagine sharing a foxhole with this woman? Could you imagine this woman being in charge of a platooon?
      Her heart is stained. Beautiful on the outside and ugly inside.

      Like

      • Sha says:

        libby: I wouldn’t wont to share a foxhole with her…… Even if she would let me die, I wouldn’t let her because that is who I am. I might get mad and tell her off but I would cover her.

        Like

      • Sharon says:

        Libby, I am white and I served in the United States Navy with Natalie Jackson, and I know of no time when she pulled any race card. Hard work and determination and a strong drive that her mother instilled in her got her to become an honorable officer in the USN. If anything she had to fight not only as a woman but as a black woman in a mans Navy to achieve the success she has achieved. In case you don’t know she served in the USN, which is the armed forces with the fewest Black Naval Officers. Natalie came up thru the ranks, she started as an E-1 (Enlisted) and worked her way up to becoming an Officer. It wasn’t given to her because of her race, that isn’t how it works. As I said earlier, hard work and determination instilled by her mother is how she became an Officer in the United States Navy. Also, her father was an Officer in the United Stated Army and was killed in the Vietnam War, he was a hero dying for his country saving lives, ” Oh, I don’t think he stopped to see if he was saving only black men”. So Libby I suggest you do your homework before you try slandering a Veteran and an Attorney who goes the extra mile for all Human Beings, regardless of their race.
        Sharon Sims

        Like

        • auscitizenmom says:

          It seems that she has changed a great deal since then, because she has obviously lied and is willing to do anything to send an innocent man to prison.

          Like

        • LandauMurphyFan says:

          Sharon, it’s very unfortunate that along with the strong drives that her mother instilled in her that led to her becoming an honorable officer in the USN, there was a drive instilled that was as strong if not stronger, and that drive was the view that life was all about fighting white people (see the quotes below the pictures of Jackson and her mother at the top of this thread). You would agree, I assume, that a child raised by some Grand Master of the KKK would have a distorted view of AA’s? Racism is racism whichever way it flows.

          If the US Navy managed to direct Jackson in such a way that it enabled and encouraged her to succeed w/o playing the race card (and I have no knowledge of her naval career so I’m not arguing that point with you), then I wish with all my heart that the US Navy was running the Florida Bar and, better yet, the whole country. If she had the potential you describe, it’s nothing short of tragic that her career in civilian life has been so focused on racism that (as per the tweet above) she accuses her fellow lawyers of racism when they have done nothing more than offer in evidence the words written and pictures/videos taken by a troubled young man who happened to be black. Moreover, she recently tweeted a number of her fellow lawyers advising them to treat Martin with the same respect they would show to non-minorities in their coverage of the Zimmerman trial, thus implying that before they’d written a word, she viewed them as likely to be racist. Several of them (Richard Hornsby is one name I remember) were deeply offended at this display of racial prejudice.

          As a final point, if she does indeed go the extra mile for all human beings, regardless of their race, I’d be obliged if you could point me to any case where she has represented a white person in a court of law. AFAIK, the law firm for which she works doesn’t employ a single white lawyer. How would we describe a law firm that employed only whites?

          Like

    • LetJusticePrevail says:

      Sha, I think that you may have missed something here. NataLIE hasn’t been taught that her skin color places her at a disadvantage. She has been taught how her skin color can be used as an ADVANTAGE in almost every conceivable situation, and she as been trained (since birth) on exactly HOW to do it. And NataLIE does it repeatedly, but for personal gain and aggrandizement, rather than for any altruistic purpose. For NataLIE, it isn’t about “her people”, is is all about NataLIE.

      Like

      • Sha says:

        LJP : I think you might be right ! That is why she will never be Blessed with piece in her heart…… to much selfishness in there. 😦

        Like

  7. ctdar says:

    Similar to a terrorist, Natty was indoctrinated & raised with hate by her parents, or did just her mother stick around? The end result is all in the company one keeps.

    Like

  8. dizzymissl says:

    It is no surprise she ended up like this after being raised to hate and be intolerant. At this point, however, she is old enough to know better and should have changed her ways.

    Hopefully, she did not reproduce.

    Like

  9. libby says:

    I found this to be the best comment I have read all weekend (found it at the communist news newtwork). nataLIE should appreciate this comment (since it represents her postiion so well)
    .
    A year ago: “Trayvon Martin was an innocent little angel, and anyone who says otherwise is a stereotyping racist.”
    .
    Today: “Trayvon Martin’s character is completely irrelevant, and anyone who says otherwise is a stereotyping racist.”

    Like

  10. At this point, all I have for this racist crowd of hate-filled lunatics, who call themselves “righteous”…

    Like

  11. taqiyyologist says:

    Ah, to be stuck in the spam filter, with an amazing and rare “gif” image of Mr. Rogers flipping the double-deuce, at these abjectly, proudly racist, hate-filled leeches.

    Like

  12. nameofthepen says:

    For some, vengeance motivates and bonds much more strongly than love ever could. 😐

    Like

  13. disgustedwithjulison says:

    hope I get a hat tip for finding these photos SD! Maybe even a Breitbart Star! Haven’t seen one of those in a while! I am tired of these racists and their conduct throughout this trial. Its plain wrong. People have been injured and even killed because of their phoney racist construct and I am glad you are exposing this.

     photo BreitbartBadge.jpg

    Like

  14. Sentenza says:

    So showing Martin how he really was is somehow racism?

    What world does she live in?

    Like

    • wanderlust says:

      In our current PC world, you must ignore all facts that are negative towards AA. If you do not – bingo, you’re a racist. Got it now? You’re welcome… glad I could be of help.

      Like

  15. Reblogged this on Cave of the Ice People and commented:
    Orwell didn’t envision this ‘dark side’*coughracecardcough* side of the future, did he?

    Like

  16. ytz4mee says:

    “Boycott All White Businesses Owned Here In Sanford Florida”

    I am sorry for pointing out the obvious, but why would they think this would be “punishment” for the business owners in Sanford, FL? A black-free, self-imposed shopping segregation would only increase sales. One of the reasons I shop online and not in stores is because I refuse to deal with the antics of the ghetto trash in the local malls. The biggest reason for in home movie theatre set ups is to avoid the ghetto trash antics at your local theatre. Blacks in Sanford constitute about 30% of the population, and the per capita income for the city is just $20,000. So explain to me again why a “boycott” is a threat and not a boon?

    It reminds me of the “boycott” the illegal aliens staged about 10 years ago in the first round of demands for a new round of amnesty. In our area, people were thrilled with the lack of congestion on the streets, shops, etc. It made people realize how much negative congestion and offensive behavior (urinating in public, oogling young girls and masturbating in public) they would be released from in an illegal alien free community. The entire stunt backfired big time. It energized people to demand local enforcement of immigration statutes to remove these negative influences permanently. They’ve never threatened to “boycott” since.

    Like

  17. arkansasmimi says:

    Tonight at 9: Both lawyers from the Trayvon Martin case, the “Bee” adds vocab., and Ben Ferguson on “The Grill”

    On a day which has seen George Zimmerman lose a handful of potentially critical pretrial motions, this evening Piers Morgan welcomes a collection of the case’s significant players.

    Mark O’Mara, Zimmerman’s attorney, and Benjamin Crump, the attorney for Trayvon Martin’s family, will each return to “Piers Morgan Live” for one-on-one interviews, while legal experts and decorated courtroom veterans Gloria Allred and Alan Dershowitz will supply all the relevant insight and context as part of Tuesday evening’s “Law and Disorder” segment.
    http://piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/28/

    Like

    • ytz4mee says:

      I don’t see GZ as having lost “potentially critical pretrial motions” – that was a fair bit of hyperbole on the part of PM.

      Most of the motions were grandstanding to benefit the Scheme Team and the Trashcan Duo. There were limitations on what could be mentioned in opening statements, but any door the State opens with respect to the “type of person Trayvon Martin was” that they intend to present to the jury, opens up the can of rebuttal evidence, which involves reputation/character evidence.

      As MOM repeatedly asserted, on a case by case basis, what is allowed is directly tied to “what type of person” the State attempts to concoct for the consumption of the jury.

      The Scheme Team doesn’t like being reminded that BDLR has to go first and make his case.

      Like

      • John Galt says:

        The big problem is that Nelson is gatekeeper of evidence and jurors. I expect that her initial questionnaire will effectively eliminate most white males with jobs.

        Like

    • jello333 says:

      Dersh! I bet Corey called him up and told him he better be careful what he says tonight.

      Like

      • arkansasmimi says:

        Hope someone watches and posts what he says, maybe he can chit chat with Omara afterwards 🙂 I don’t have cable so depending on Treepers lol

        Like

  18. jello333 says:

    PROJECTION

    That pretty well describes everything about members of the Scheme Team. When they accuse others of racism, of dishonesty, of having “insider influence”, of having “family issues”, or of being violent and threatening… all that and much more is quite clearly just them looking at themselves in the mirror. Pretty much EVERYTHING they have accused George, his family, his lawyers, and his supporters of being is, in fact, what the Schemers are.

    Like

  19. coreshift says:

    NatJack can’t help herself. Sometimes her ‘condition’ causes her to regress to the persona of a teenage girl. Who am I kidding, she’s always like that. She just hides it well.

    Like

  20. arkansasmimi says:

    ROFLMBO TRUE

    Like

  21. Pingback: The Trayvon Martin Case; Update 29.2: Tragedy and Farce. | Stately McDaniel Manor

  22. arkansasmimi says:

    ROFLMBO Wonder if her racist Tweets to Analyst had anything to do with it! Hope THEY ALL SHUN HER!

    Like

  23. Redrider says:

    Ya like this group of tweets

    Like

  24. Redrider says:

    But I found this one to be better
    https://twitter.com/MarkEiglarsh
    or his response
    https://twitter.com/MarkEiglarsh

    Like

  25. Redrider says:

    She has me Blocked….lol so I can only post links to some. Wonder what I said to her to piss her off so badly? Oh I remember now

    https://twitter.com/kim_5564/media/grid
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BJIiXqDCEAADq3I.jpg:large

    Like

    • John Galt says:

      If I wanted to jerk her chain, I would register with a black person’s picture and a name like I_Heart_Trayvon. I would start out with some civil rights babble to become accepted. A few MLK quotes. A couple tweets about Emmett Till. Then I would start slipping in questions like: Professor Dershowitz said on Piers Morgan that GZ had the right to shoot Trayvon when he was beating GZ’s head against the sidewalk, even if GZ was a racist and pursued Trayvon because he was black. Is that true? I would copy all the legal commentators with that tweet, so they could correct NatJack if she responded with “No, of course not.”

      Like

      • jello333 says:

        Yeah, we can all start pretending to be Trayvonites, and see how they respond. I suggest we start with this: “I don’t know if it’s true about Trayvon filming the homeless man beat-down or not. But think about this… think about how much the homeless mess up our cities. They’re smelly and sometimes rude. They’re always trying to bum money off the rest of us. So if Trayvon did help beat up one, is that really such a bad thing? What’s the big deal?”

        And then watch the scumbags go, “Yeah, right on! Trayvon just cleaning up the streets.”

        Like

      • Redrider says:

        LMAO… But I will do it and let you see the responses. It is funnier do something to create humor because I truly despise this woman due to her sleazy tactics.

        Like

        • dizzymissl says:

          I saw you had the video of MOM and BLDR’s conversation at the end of the hearing. Could you tell what they were saying? I listened and could not make much of it.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s