Crumped Up Charges – It is no surprise the “DeeDee” narrative’s creator, Benjamin Crump, has himself “lawyered up”…

truthGiven the latest hearing outcomes, it is perhaps prudent to go back and look at the October hearing once again, to visit what was being said about DeeDee, and the recording of her, by Trayvon Family Attorney Benjamin Crump; In court, to Nelson, in October.

It is also worth noting that Judge Nelson formerly “ordered and approved” the deposition of Benjamin Crump as it specifically relates to the “interview and recording” of the Witness #8, DeeDee. Given the court’s prior approval how can Benjamin Crump now seek to avoid ?

Review the segment of this video from 1:04:10 To 1:13:15 (October Hearing)

Might be also worth noting, in that video segment Judge Nelson erroneously believed the recording of the interview was made “on a telephone” as in the telephone captured and retains the conversation. This was *inferred* by the prosecution to Judge Nelson and when told not to change, alter, or delete the recording “on the phone” Benjamin Crump did nothing to correct the belief, and to the contrary affirmed to the court her mistaken belief.

Additionally, from the motions filed today in Ben Crump’s quest to avoid deposition, which the Judge had already ruled were appropriate, it appears his attorney is again misrepresenting obvious “FACTS” to the court. Example:

Crump Games 1

“certain other family members” (?)

crump Games 2

“I have no knowledge as to whether that [ABC’s] device was ever successfully used to record any portion of the interview”  (?)

Crump Games 3

Matt Gutman - ABC News interviews Tracy Martin

Gutman tweet 2

This entry was posted in BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Conspiracy ?, George Zimmerman Open Thread, Mark O'Mara, media bias, Trayvon Martin, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to Crumped Up Charges – It is no surprise the “DeeDee” narrative’s creator, Benjamin Crump, has himself “lawyered up”…

  1. maggiemoowho says:

    Somehow, I just don’t think the Judge will ever CHOOSE to understand what is happening here. She thinks DeDe will know when the prosecution found out about her.


    • maggiemoowho says:

      Not that it is a big deal, but I hope BDLR reads that document because at the first hearing he made a stink about the 911 tapes being released and looked to the defence as he made that comment(like it was them). Maybe now that it is in Black and White he will see who got the tapes released.(not that he didn’t know from the start)


  2. John Galt says:

    Weird that Crump states that he doesn’t know if ABC has a recording. Hope this isn’t a prelude to ABC stating that they have no recordings.


    • jello333 says:

      I understand why others think I’m crazy for saying this, but I ain’t afraid of no ridicule! 😉 So I’ll say again: I think MOM and West already have some knowledge of what’s on Gutman’s tape, maybe from Gutman himself.


    • boricuafudd says:

      John, I was thinking that the recording if it exist will match Crump’s or that only select portions are recorded. The ground been laid for either of those occurrences.


  3. Raoul says:

    MoM on Hannity now.


  4. ftsk420 says:

    Who called ABC was it Crump or Dee Dee.


  5. John Galt says:

    Start listening @ 8:00 Crump seems to contradict his affidavit: “go back” “re-record”


  6. ftsk420 says:

    Crump came with the recording before ABC right.


  7. ftsk420 says:

    So according to Gutman owns words he found Dee Dee by getting her number from the phone record.

    “Obviously, you know, at some point, this may or may not go to court, and she could be subpoenaed. But at the very least I think that it`s obvious since her number is in the phone record, which is how we got to her, that the police should have talked to her, at least interviewed her. But they never have”.

    Which phone record would that be. Gutman has the same recording as Crump from the same day but Gutman doesn’t run the story right away lets Crump do his thing then airs it. Tells me Crump approached Gutman with an exclusive story but Gutman had to wait till Crump did his press conference before he could use it. That’s how I think it went down.


  8. auscitizenmom says:

    Thank you Sundance for making this available. I had watched the proceedings, but the comments on this were very helpful in understanding what was actually going on.


  9. The irony, Crump hiring whitey to represent his race-baiting arse.


  10. jordan2222 says:

    Has anyone ever heard of this tactic before to avoid a depo of such an important player in a case?


  11. rumpole2 says:

    Surly… even if Dee Dee were for real… the fact that a witness is contacted by people with a vested interest in this criminal case in itself, not to mention potential multi-million dollar civil cases effected by it… then that witness is “contaminated” or potentially so?
    IMO In addition to Crump contamination…BDLR’s contact with her (or another DD) adds to the contamination. Even his recorded interview contains glaring examples of him “leading” and in effect feeding her information. Heaven know how much information he fed her before and after that recording. And whether he did that or not is not the point …. the point is that there is a POSSIBILITY that that occurred and so the witness is contaminated and her testimony should be inadmissible in this murder trial. So why are we proceeding? The PCA is toast as is any case BDLR might make.
    The only reason to continue with the farce that is Dee Dee is to gather evidence for subsequent criminal and civil proceedings involving the Scheme Team members (and others)


    • eastern2western says:

      another stupid thing the martins did is that they have already declared that they would not rest until zimmerman is convicted by a jury which will cast another level of doubt in a witness who was first contacted by them.


    • jello333 says:

      Yes, I think this IS an attempt to get Dee Dee’s statements ruled inadmissible. But it’s the prosecution trying to do that, in a roundabout way. They need to be find a way to get rid of them in such a way that it also gets rid of any evidence of manipulation, tampering, CONSPIRACY on the part of the players in this. Which means they need it to disappear BEFORE all the facts surrounding it comes to light. Look… doesn’t Crump sound like he’s setting Dee Dee up to be the liar? “I didn’t see her, I was just on the phone. I didn’t see an ID or anything. I didn’t tell her what to say, she just said it all on her own.” Plausible deniability. So sounds to me like he’s not all that concerned if it comes out that Dee Dee’s a liar; he’s MUCH more concerned that HE NOT be called a liar.

      In short, if Crump and the prosecution can figure out a way to keep Dee Dee in this game without endangering themselves, they’ll do it…. otherwise, out she goes.


  12. nettles18 says:

    Mr. Crump is coming across as absolutely inept. His handling of the witness is awful. Why he didn’t take this information to the police is beyond me. He tells us that W8 had a serious mistrust of the police but I think the reality is Mr. Crump does and he passes that on to the clients.

    He lied to the press and all the public in telling us W8 is a minor. In reading the affidavit he wants us to believe he didn’t have a clue what was going to be said but he invited the press in to listen anyway. He never met her, he doesn’t know her last name, the phone isn’t in this girl’s name so what evidence does he have THIS girl is connected to THIS phone.

    The further help us gain a picture of how inept Mr. Crump is, we are all reading his driver’s license number in a public document. How does his guy have any clients? Seriously, how?


  13. BertDilbert says:

    If Gutman states in his tweet that he has the only copy of the recording, then destroying that copy would be the destruction of evidence. If Gutman believed that he has the only copy, then he must have provided a copy of that to Crump. Crump would then have downgraded the original, which is why the recording the prosecution/defense got was so poor.

    Thus there must be part of the story recorded that will not fly in the courtroom. Thus the need to conceal.from defense and prosecution in order to have a case. Did the prosecution advise Crump the recording was problematic to the case or did Crump figure that out on his own?

    I think this is all BS to keep the full Gutman tape from seeing the light of day. When we have the Gutman tape, the story will unravel.


  14. Dr. Bogus Pachysandra says:

    Just stumbled across this. Unrelated to this issue.
    “Zimmerman Brother: George Supported Obama, Wanted to End ‘Club of White Men'”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s