It is time for the main stream media to begin asking the right questions.  Actually, it is the only request we have begged for since mid-March when the fiasco now know as the George Zimmerman prosecution took a turn toward the insufferable.   So, here, we will outline the questions.  The questions that will end this case – if, but one honest and objective reporter will ask……..  Please.

First  – the “understanding“.  Rather than repeat the Truth as it has existed since March 16th for anyone to see – Let me just request you revisit OUR PRIOR UPDATE #11 (April)

Within that update you see the set up for where we are today.   Nothing since that update has changed one bit.   And now the TRUTH of that update comes to light.   Here’s how:

Last week the following Hearing took place in the Trayvon Martin Shooting.   Because so many journalists have never actually engaged in seeking the TRUTH they didn’t know what they just witnessed.   So we will draw it with bold underlines for you.

There is a lot of stuff in there. But for the sake of “Truth Seeking” let me just take you to the segment with Don West. Don West has been the “investigator” of the evidence. Don West has been, and continues to be, the person doing the leg work and assembling the facts surrounding the State’s evidence and case.

He is also the attorney who knows the guise.

At approximately 54:00 minute mark  Don West enters the conversation to argue the motions to compel the State to produce and clarify their discovery, or lack thereof, and address their insistence in hiding the evidence of their prosecutorial case.

First the motion to compel the state to release the addresses of witnesses. In this motion he asks for Sybrina Fulton, Tracy Martin, Jahvaris Fulton and Witness #8, or W8 “DeeDee”.   If you have read update #11 you know the importance of  witness “DeeDee” to the prosecution case.

You can actually hear what she has to say HERE:   Dee Dee Interview with Bernie de la Rionda.

Regarding the addresses Mr. West notes “only four of which we are asking for ‘Today‘“.

The State through prosecutor, Bernie de la Rionda, argues that releasing the addresses of these four witnesses poses a “safety risk” to them.   This, despite the safeguards already in place to redact the names and personally identifiable information from witnesses in the case.   Why?

You see, all other witnesses addresses have been released to the defense.  Except these specific parties to the case.   Why is there risk to the prosecution from divulging the addresses of Sybrina, Tracy, Jahvaris and DeeDee to the DEFENSE, the defense, not the public.   Why is this a risk to the prosecution.?

Ask yourself this question.

What about releasing the actual address of “DeeDee” is it, that presents a risk to the prosecution case.    The ridiculous “safety issue” is a phony concern, a ruse, a made up excuse.   There is no more actual or realistic risk to her than there is to any other witness.  So why does the prosecution afford her a divergent consideration?

What “honorable” reason is there to hide her?

Despite what prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda says, they are not “protecting her identity from the public“, those safeguards are already in place.   Why do they need to protect her identity from the “defense“?

Are they protecting her, or are they protecting themselves?

You see, the judge, I think, sniffs the issue, she senses it…. she sees what’s coming… but she does not want to cue anyone in the court to what she suspects the defense is concerned about;  and her suspicions are founded.   VERY Well founded.

She ruled (wrongly in my opinion) that the address can be kept secret until DeeDee is deposed, by Don West/ Mark O’Mara, under the coordination of Prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda and Angela Corey.   But why?

She did state that West/O’Mara can ask her the address in the deposition, and if DeeDee refuses to give it – bring that information back to her courtroom.   She did also state that she would consider a motion for a deposition “suspension” and “continuance” if West/O’Mara want to depose for the address, pause the deposition, do the investigation and then return to questions.   She did lay the groundwork for this.

But why is this needed?

Why won’t the prosecution just provide the address of Witness #8, just like they have the prior 30+ witnesses, including minors?

Certainly the Judge knows that without an address there can be no pre-deposition investigation of DeeDee herself.   *Note the real name of DeeDee is known to O’Mara/West and Bernie de la Rionda/ Angela Corey.  Along with obviously the Martin family and perhaps ABC reporter Matt Gutman.

Regarding the initial DeeDee Telephonic interview on 3/19/12 with the exclusive ABC reporter Matt Gutman present – We outlined the previous concerns with this HERE:

Is ABC’s Matt Gutman In Collusion With Trayvon Family Attorney Benjamin Crump?   The March 19th “ABC exclusive” expose’ story regarding the phone records found by Tracy Martin, and subsequently the mysteriously scripted “DeeDee” phone call/non-interview talking points, which aired on ABC News appears to have been staged, contrived and made up by Trayvon Martin Family Attorney Benjamin Crump.   Willfully and intentionally sold without question by ABC reporter Matt Gutman.

Trayvon’s phone logs, also obtained exclusively by ABC News, show the conversation occurred five minutes before police first arrived on the scene. Crump said the girl’s identity was being withheld because “her parents are gravely concerned about her health and her safety.” Her parents asked that only an attorney be allowed to ask her questions.

Martin’s father, Tracy Martin, and mother, Sybrina Fulton, listened to the call, along with ABC News Matt Gutman.  (article)

As to the content of his reporting, and the actual recording of the conversation, when questioned Matt Gutman said the following  via twitter:

So exactly what the heck was  Prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda talking about at the 1:06 mark in the video when he said:

… Mr. Crump was not present when the interview took place with Mr. Crump ….

[Go watch the video of the hearing – yeah he said that]

Ask yourself again.   What possible “honorable” reason could there be for keeping the address of W8, DeeDee, the single State’s witness who led to an arrest of George Zimmerman, away from the defense?

What do the prosecutors have to hide?

Why are the prosecutors filing motions to suppress, or conceal, evidence?   Why are the prosecutors filing motions to close hearings?   To gag attorneys from talking?  To bar the media?  Why?

Why is Mark O’Mara finding law enforcement agents and District Attorneys who claim there is no case against George Zimmerman?   Why is Mark O’Mara and Don West finding police officers who claim they had meetings to discuss the case and within all of those meetings there was consensus that no evidence existed to contradict George Zimmerman.

Why did the Sanford district attorney, Wolfinger, find “no evidence”, yet the “appointed” State Attorney Angela Corey, and Prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda, found probable cause to arrest?

What changed?   What was different?

Why?

Don’t take my word for it.   Watch the hearing again yourself.

Believe your own eyes and ears.   Trust your own judgement.   Don’t take my word for it.

Then READ THIS again.