According to police reports last night, an NBC producer named James G. Morrison was stopped while following the bus carrying jurors in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. As explained by Judge Bruce Shroeder earlier today, Mr. Morrison told the police he was under instructions from his New York office to follow the jurors and take pictures.
The NBC producer was following the bus when he ran a red light and was stopped by police. Judge Shroeder stated during court an investigation is underway, and the ramifications are quite serious. In the interim, the judge has banned MSNBC from the courthouse building. WATCH:
[…] “The jury in this case is being transported from a different location in a bus with windows covered so they don’t have to look at — aren’t exposed to — any signs by one side or the other, or interest in the case. So I’m going to call it a sealed bus. And that’s been done every day, and then they are brought here to this building,” Schroeder explained. “Last evening, a person who identified himself as James G. Morrison, and who claimed that he was a producer with NBC News, employed by MSNBC … the police when they stopped him because he was following at a distance of about a block … and went through a red light, they pulled him over and inquired what was going on and he gave that information.”
Update!
Newsmax
@newsmax
·
2h
A Newsmax source reports that they overheard Kyle Rittenhouse’s attorney saying that he believed the jury is at a 6-6 split. @MikeCarterTV
reports from the courthouse in Kenosha.
Can you believe it? Uneffingbelievable.
Branca’s latest impressions. Increasing suspicion about who is holding out on the jury and taking command along w/his thoughts on the judge agreeing to let jurors take home the instructions…
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/11/rittenhouse-verdict-watch-has-jury-foreperson-gone-rogue-and-holding-back-acquittal/
Legal Insurrection was pretty trustworthy back during the Zimmerman persecution, near as I could tell
His “single holdout juror” premise is 100% at odds with the 6-6split rumor some have posted, I’ll note
Agree their coverage is very trustworthy. As to the jury split, it’s all conjecture at this point. I guess we’ll find out soon enough.
and . . . . China.
Affirmative action hire.
notice some commonality with people who do un american acts?
Where is this bus taking the jurors?
To a parking lot where they’ve left their cars each day?
Or to individual homes, like a school-bus route?
Anyone?
Either way, this stalker (or anyone else) could follow to the destination(s) and photograph license plates or street addresses and use them to DOX the jurors
Right?
Jury is now sequestered in a secret location.
(Would trust Legal Insurrection over Spicer & Newsmax on this one.)
Wouldn’t surveillance be easier from the HD Drone the FBI is using over Kenosha? The NY Times probably already downloaded it from them…
Geez….
I think Kyle’s lawyers are working for the other side:
Newsmax
@newsmax
·
3h
A Newsmax source reports that they overheard Kyle Rittenhouse’s attorney saying that he believed the jury is at a 6-6 split. @MikeCarterTV
reports from the courthouse in Kenosha.
Is he always so bumbling…that….uh…..well…..uh. He and Joe need to take a hike to the old people’s home, it seems.
Hilarious!
This is obviously serious, given MSLSD and NBC were clearly working the false narrative and a Dox.
I’m much more disturbed by 36 hours of review by this jury. It is a video demonstrably clear-cut case of self defense under Wisconsin law.
Given the trial, I pray it is hung, and the Foreperson has the guts to tell the judge, ” We have a couple of morons who can’t understand, or have a different agenda.”
After telling them to try again, when they report the same idiocy, he thanks them, dismisses them, and shoves the mistrial motion so far up the prosecutions ass that the clowns wind up disbarred.
The prosecutors are either totally inept, or completely corrupted, take your pick. Neither deserves a license.
Is that John Durham at the trial? Or is the pic fake?
It’s the defense expert that ran the videos, can’t recall the name.
What a resemblance! Thanks.
Black, John I think
maybe pixels added maybe not
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEcHnniXIAUWb5p?format=jpg&name=small
Rittenhouse VERDICT WATCH: Suspect A Rogue Juror, #54, Foreperson, Is Holding Back Acquittal
https://lawofselfdefense.com/rittenhouse-verdict-watch-suspect-a-rogue-juror-54-foreperson-is-holding-back-acquittal/
Another lie by the Rittenhouse trial prosecutor…
Click>>> Starnes Debunks Rittenhouse Prosecutor’s Claim Nobody’s Died from Skateboard – Todd Starnes
There are many missteps here: (1) the case should not have been indicted in the first place because prosecutors are not tasked with garnering convictions. They are specifically and ethically obligated to seek justice which means they are obligated to dismiss cases where the facts do not support conviction under the law. Of course there are gray area times where the case goes forward. This case isn’t one of them; ; (2) I have never seen a case where the prosecution’s case more substantively supported the defense of self-defense than this one; (3) the prosecution impeached the credibility of their witnesses by cross examining them and contradicting their factual testimony through questioning which is in direct contravention of the rules of evidence unless prior to the witness’s testimony you establish that the witness is “aligned with the other party” or where you claim “surprise” at the testimony content which is difficult with your own witnesses because you are supposed to be prepared for their testimony; (4) the judge should have dismissed the case at the close of the prosecution’s case under R. 29 of the rules of criminal procedure but it appears that Wisconsin may not have that rule which provides that if the prosecution’s case does not prove the case the judge can dismiss it then.
Although full disclosure I am not admitted in Wisconsin, I would be most surprised if the judge does not have the legal authority to dismiss a case which has not been proven as a matter of law before it goes to a jury; (5) this jury should have been sequestered, if not for the entire trial certainly when deliberations started. This is standard in any high profile media case of substance which of course anyone with an ounce of sense knows this is; (6) the prosecutor should have been admonished and prevented from wearing any type of pin or attire that might forecast his personal vouching for his case. This is a big no/no and in my experience has resulted in cases being overturned on appeal; and (6) the judge has the ability and authority to remove protesters from the campus of the courthouse especially in light of the threats of intimidation circulating directed at both the judge and jury and he has not done so for some inexplicable reason. Those protesters can protest under the First Amendment, but there is a reasonable time, place and manner restriction that would control their being able to do so on the courthouse campus where interference with the defendant’s right to a fair trial is a reality.
So history will provide that this case has more missteps than the OJ trial in my view. I can only hope that this young man doesn’t read about it from a jail cell. This prosecution is a miscarriage of justice. These prosecutors have done an injustice to the work of all prosecutors across the country in their unethical behavior which laypeople across the country interpret as unchecked standard prosecutorial practice, which in fact it is not.