Following up on what we shared yesterday about the CNN analysts questioning the integrity of the Mike Brown shooting audio recordings, things are getting even more interesting.
It appears Mrs. Lopa Blumenthal is asking CNN to publicly retract their concerns. However, in so doing she is outlining her affiliation with the entire scheme. In the Washington Post article she is now laying NO CLAIM to contacting CNN with the audio recording.
So who do you think would have called CNN ?   The same scheme team who delivered the audio, ie. Manufactured Media Evidence, to the FBI.   That would be Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump.  Once you get on board with Parks and Crump, you don’t get off until your reputation is ruined. 

First her recent espousals – (WaPo) Lopa Blumenthal says she knows how today’s news cycles go. “I understand that the media’s fickle,” she says.
Yet she says she’s “not going to tolerate” the treatment she received this morning on CNN’s “New Day” morning program. As reported on this blog, a CNN law-enforcement commentator, Tom Fuentes, said of an audiotape whose release Blumenthal had negotiated with CNN on Monday: “When I heard this yesterday, I thought the exact same thing — it’s a hoax,” said Fuentes, who clarified that he was ultimately unsure of its status.
“Hoax” sticks with Blumenthal, who stumbled into representing someone who was allegedly taping a chat with a “girl” on Aug. 9 at the time that 18-year-old Michael Brown Jr. was shot in Ferguson, Mo.; it features a voice whispering flattery to the “girl” punctuated by about 10 apparent gunshots.
Blumenthal vouches for the integrity of the person who made the recording but concedes that it hasn’t yet been authenticated by the FBI or by various news organizations. It’s one thing to note that authentication is pending, however, and quite another to use the word “hoax” in connection with her efforts, says Blumenthal.

“I’m not going to tolerate being maligned and have malicious intent applied,” she says.
Toward that end, Blumenthal today contacted CNN’s Don Lemon as well as another staffer at the network to plead her case. “I need some form of redress,” she says. “My demand would be to not only do a retraction but to basically say that when CNN aired it they were fully aware of the fact that it wasn’t fully authenticated, and they decided to air it in any case with the disclaimer.”
It’s the turnabout that rankles Blumenthal. The way she narrates the story, a “prior client” of hers alerted her to the recording, which was made by the roommate of the “prior client.” Blumenthal felt it was important to make sure that the authorities got a hold of the recording, though she wasn’t intent on a massive media rollout.
But CNN called, and she cooperated with the network on the terms under which the network presented the material to its viewers — for example, she insisted that only the audio component of the recording — and not the video, which would have outed the recorder — would be aired on CNN. To then watch as the network’s law enforcement analyst chat about a “hoax” was a bit much for the St. Louis area lawyer.  (read more)

If Blumenthal didn’t call CNN, how did CNN find out about the audio ?

You see, ultimately the Scheme Team thought the release of an audio showing shots fired would assist their demands for an arrest.   They are concocting “media evidence”.
But it backfired because the number of shots and timing did not match with the framework of their own manufactured autopsy.   According to the autopsy Mike Brown was shot 6 times IN THE FRONT.
According to the audio, the final volley of shots, after the 3 second pause, was 4 in a 1-3 sequence.   If Mike was running away, and turned during the pause -as was their claim- how could he have six bullet holes from 4 bullets?
And where is the sound of the initial shot fired at the vehicle ?  (for which there is clearly a brass casing evident at the drivers door – see below)

The Scheme Team is making up media evidence as they go along.
Their goal is an arrest, not a conviction or trial, just an arrest.   Once they get the arrest they have enough probable cause to begin to filing their wrongful death lawsuits.
What they are doing now is the exact same thing they did in the Zimmerman case in March of 2012.