Knock Out Attacks – Another New York City Councilwoman Says Jews Bring It On Themselves…

Last week a New York City politician, Charles Barron, said the only way to stop black’s from punching Jewish people and non-blacks in the face was to pay blacks to stop.   This week another local politician steps forth to say it’s the Jew’s fault.

Laurie Cumbo NEW YORK - A local New York City politician and ally of mayor-elect Bill de Blasio says  the recent spate of “knockout” attacks in Brooklyn may stem from “a genuine  concern” about Jewish influence.

Laurie Cumbo, the councilwoman-elect for the Brooklyn neighborhood of Crown  Heights, made the comments in an open letter posted to her Facebook page. In the letter,  Cumbo reports that many of her African-American constituents are alarmed by the  growth of the local Jewish community.

The resulting tension, she says, could have lead to a number of attacks on  Jewish residents that bear the hallmarks of a “game” in which teens attempt to  knock someone unconscious with one punch.

Laurie cumbo 2.1

“Many African American/Caribbean residents expressed a genuine concern that  as the Jewish community continues to grow, they would be pushed out by their  Jewish landlords or by Jewish families looking to purchase homes,” Cumbo  wrote. ”I respect and appreciate the Jewish community’s family values and  unity that has led to strong political, economic and cultural gains… While  I personally regard this level of tenacity, I also recognize that for others,  the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and  a sense that Jewish success is not also their success.”

Like mayor-elect de Blasio, Cumbo hails from the resurgent left wing of the  city’s Democratic Party. De Blasio, who once volunteered to assist the radical  socialist Sandinista movement in Nicaragua, will be New York City’s first  Democratic mayor in 20 years when he’s inaugurated next month.  (continue reading)

About these ads
This entry was posted in BGI - Black Grievance Industry, CRS, Cultural Marxism, Death Threats, Decepticons, Election 2014, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, Israel, media bias, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Racism, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

54 Responses to Knock Out Attacks – Another New York City Councilwoman Says Jews Bring It On Themselves…

  1. PatriotUSA says:

    After reading through the comments on her FB page, it is so sad that so many people think she is doing a great job. Several comments are from Jewish people and all I can say is incredibly sad. I just cannot make the connection here. Do these people not recall what happened in Europe and how it is storming up again. Yeah, lets get victim and criminal together so they can understand each others cultures better and get along swell after the perp is left off with slap on his/her wrist? How well has this worked anywhere?

    I predict NYC will see a huge spike in crimes like the knockout game, polar bear hunting and much worse. The collectivists will wring their red hands and do nothing except raise taxes for more services to give away to those who commit these crimes. This goes way beyond the Jews.

    • doodahdaze says:

      With a communist mayor what could go wrong? See Detroit:

    • ytz4mee says:

      The “Knockout Game” is taking place in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn.
      There is a large Jewish population in Forest Hills, Queens, also surrounded by large, majority black public housing complexes. The “Knock out Game” hasn’t come to Forest Hills.

      There is a large Jewish presence in and around the “92nd Street Y” on the Upper East Side, with huge nasty welfare projects a few blocks north in lower Harlem. Yet the “Knock out Game” hasn’t taken over the Upper East Side – in fact, I know of no reported incidents.

      Only Crown Heights.

      There’s a reason for that, and it’s not just that the victims in Crown Heights are “Jewish”.

  2. we should take the knock out game to dc
    and start knocking out so called politicians

  3. stella says:

    What a despicable thing to say/think. Does she not see the racist nature of this attitude? The constant stirring up of envy (such as Obama is doing with his income equality initiative) is an evil, evil, thing: the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success.

    • howie says:

      The truth is that she does not. To her only a white can be racist. You must realize this basic tenet in order to understand how warped they are. Racism to them is not what traditional racism defined was. This is a fanatic foot soldier in the camp of the Black Nationalists. Utterly immersed in it.

      • libby says:

        I think she sees her racist attitude alright and she thinks it is perfectly ok for her to hate on whites. In other words, black racism is the good kind of hate (in her worldview)

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        I believe you “nailed it”, Howie. Her letter is dripping with the “victim mentality” rhetoric. The totally ironic thing is that she can clearly express the root causes of both the successes of the jewish community and the failures of the black community when she says:

        ”I respect and appreciate the Jewish community’s family values and unity that has led to strong political, economic and cultural gains… While I personally regard this level of tenacity, I also recognize that for others, the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success.”

        But, rather than use this as a teaching moment for her black constituents, and call for a renewed effort to instill the same type of “family values and unity” in the black community, she resorts to blaming others:

        “…many ways governmental neglect, outside uncontrolled influences and failed leadership have led to the breakdown that so many young people of color are currently facing…”

        And, if that’s not enough, she even chastises the media for (finally) accurately reporting these ethnically oriented hate crimes:

        “She also complains that the media is spending too much time talking about Jewish victims of crime, and not enough about black ones”

        This is the same type of convoluted thinking used by $ybrina Fulton, as she speaks to any group that will have her. It’s always about making excuses for their own behavior, or the behavior of their “young people”, while simultaneously blaming everyone around them. And, in this case, Cumbo not only acknowledges the reasons (family values and unity) for any success of her Jewish neighbors, but actually uses that success to justify whatever animosity blacks feel for Jews. In other words: “Unless you fail as miserably as we have, then you deserve whatever we do to you.”

        • Murse says:

          It makes one wonder if Gov. Wallace was correct about segregation. I think Rev Manning is correct when he says that blacks have lost their soul.

          • LetJusticePrevail" says:

            Judging from what I have (recently) read from modern sociologists, in regards to the manner in which people form their personal bonds and associations within their own demographic, segregation may not have been an entirely inappropriate practice. I do have a problem with forced segregation, just as much as I have a problem with forced integration. IMO, each should be voluntary, and self imposed.

        • John Galt says:

          + 1. Violent thug disingenuously recast as victim = “trayvoned”.

    • Success is NOT realized by sitting around looking for handouts and stealing what isn’t freely given. IF they are “jealous” of the success of the Jewish community, then perhaps they should study the Jewish work ethic try to emulate it. This is a disgusting attempt at justification. There IS not justification.

  4. ctdar says:

    So according to this Einstein it all boils down to jealousy? But let’s continue to excuse the violent antisocial behavior.
    smh

  5. Tooskinneejs says:

    She didn’t say Jews “bring it on themselves,” she said that some in the black community have resentment because of Jews’ perceived success relative to blacks. She didn’t say this resentment was just, she only said that, right or wrong, it exists. Reading her entire facebook post, she actually sounded quite reasonable on the issue.

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      Sorry, but I’m just not buying that appraisal of Cumbo’s words. Sure she claimed:

      “We should never blame a victim, or try to explain away any wrongdoing.”

      So, instead of “blaming the victim” she blames everyone else, even though she clearly recognized *who* the perpetrators are, and the manner in which they select their victims:

      “…I recognize that it is Black children and not Jewish children that are playing the ‘Knock Out Game…’ ” and “…offer possible insight as to how young African American/Caribbean teens could conceivably commit a “hate crime” against a community…”

      but continues by contradicting herself as she tries to spin away from what she, herself, has already acknowledged by saying:

      “…The issue of race or religion is but a red-herring …”

      Oh, she’s a clever one, but her deceit is even more apparent during THIS speech to the “No Justice, No Peace” crowd at a Trayvon Martin rally on July 14th, 2013 when she condemns other politicians for doing *exactly* what she is doing at that very moment: Using issues to further her own political agenda:

      Face it. Laurie Cumbo is utilizing one of the oldest tricks in the book. She preemptively mentions a divisive issue so she can falsely dismiss its validity to prevent any opponent from using it against her. And, more often than not, she contradicts herself in the process.

    • elvischupacabra says:

      So, by her reasoning, a young thug would use the following criteria selecting his next “contestant”:

      “Lemme see… old white dude. No, he’s poor and looks Polish or Italian. Oh, look. There’s a Hassadic Jew. Naw… his shoes are worn out. He’s probably poor or struggling to go to school. Not him. Oh, look. That guy crossing the street. He’s twenty-something, very athletic, but he’s wearing Yarmulke, a nice suit and a Rolex. Yeah, he’s prosperous, probably from exploiting the huddled masses and people of color. I’ll sucker punch him and run.”

      Even the ravings of madmen, when parsed, cleaned up and published read quite well. If you doubt me, read Mein Kampf.

    • ytz4mee says:

      The money quote is here:

      “I am particularly inspired by the fact that the Jewish community has not assimilated to the dominant American culture…”

      This is “quite reasonable” to you ? …..

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        Ahhh… I caught that too, and wondered if anyone else had noticed it. Clearly, she is inspired by this because she, herself, resists adopting the cultural practices of a more homogenous society. In other words, on the one hand she preaches about people “coming together” but, on the other, she applauds them for NOT coming together. As I observed (about her) earlier, it doesn’t take much effort to see the many contradictions in her speeches.

  6. libtardh8r says:

    “Many African American/Caribbean residents expressed a genuine concern that as the Jewish community continues to grow, they would be pushed out by their Jewish landlords or by Jewish families looking to purchase homes,”

    I’m sure the nazis said something similar right before Krtistallnacht.

    • ytz4mee says:

      What she is alluding to is the resentment in the black welfare community of Crown Heights and nearby Bed-Stuy against the jewish welfare community of Crown Heights.

      In addition to collecting every conceivable social welfare handout possible within NYC, (welfare, WIC, Section 8, free heating, etc etc etc……) the “jewish welfare” recipient also has alot of supplemental support from the jewish community at large – jewish owned housing that is not public housing, community owned businesses, etc. The blacks do not have the same level of supplemental support from the successful black diaspora, nor do they have the same sense of community and cohesion and they resent the Hassidim for it.

  7. AdukeLAXobserver says:

    There is nothing reasonable in wanting to sucker punch a person of another race in the face because you resent their race.

    • ytz4mee says:

      It’s not about “race”, it’s about who has the larger lion share of the gibmedat’s and the fact that “white” society tolerates Hasidic abuse of the welfare system, yet excoriates the black community for the exact same behavior and attitudes.

  8. Cyber says:

    “Many African American/Caribbean residents…”

    It’s sad how all those jooooooos are holding down those Caribbean residents in Haiti, Dominican Republic, Honduras, etc.

  9. tooskinneejs says:

    Here is another incident of the knock out game, this time with a metal pole, in Washington DC. Textbook case of (1) attack victim, (2) everyone laughs, (3) hoodlums run off without taking anything.

    http://www.popville.com/2013/12/man-hit-in-back-of-head-with-metal-pole-yesterday-at-5pm-by-teenagers-in-hill-east/

  10. Wat Tyler says:

    Let me explain what this woman is doing.

    0. This woman is a Marxist. Not a Marxist in the “true” sense, as modern Marxism has little to do with what he actually wrote in “The Communist Manifesto” and “Das Kapital”, or with the goals of the original socialists and communists, which were primarily economic. Instead, she is a modern Marxist, meaning that she has transferred Marxist theory about economic and social classes in 19th century Europe (the mercantilists, factory owners, land owners and particularly the people still retaining their wealth, influence and power from Europe’s feudalism period versus the people who were the descendants of the feudal serfs … Europe of Marx’s time was still a very stratified class-based society) to the modern “identity politics” issues, where race, religion, “gender”, “orientation” etc. replace economic and social class. Marx himself – as well as the Bolsheviks, Trotskyites, etc. would have nothing to do with identity politics Marxism.

    1. Identity politics Marxism retains the original Marxist notion of the “class struggle” between privileged and unprivileged groups of people. However, for the former it replaces the landowners, factory owners, aristocrats etc. – the bourgeoisie – with whites, Christians, males and heterosexuals, who are called “privileged.” Non-whites, females, LGBT and non-Christians are unprivileged, equivalent to the serfs or proletariat.

    2. Original Marxists held that the bourgeoisie “rigged the game” to make sure that they would always be rich and powerful and to keep from having to share wealth, power, influence, opportunity etc. with everyone else. Which was a particularly bad arrangement because the bourgeoisie was a very tiny percentage of the population (i.e. the 1%). The thinking was that they passed laws/formed governing systems, constructed economic systems, formed educational systems, created social orders and religious systems with the goal of keeping themselves on top and everyone else down. Anyone who opposed the inherent injustice of this or attempted to advocate on behalf of the serf/proles (or any serf/prole who got out of his place) met with brutal violence. Please keep this nugget in mind.

    3. Jews used to be part of the non-privileged class. But the combination of the rise of neo-conservative politics, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the increased importance of the Palestinian issue in leftist/radical groups (and of Muslims and Arabs in general as a result of 9/11) has now shifted Jews into the privileged class camp. The only exception: when another member of the privileged class i.e. a white conservative says or does something anti-Semitic, or that liberals can claim to be anti-Semitic.

    4. When a member of an unprivileged group acts in a criminal fashion, it is usually depicted as a way of rebelling, whether consciously or subconsciously, against an unjust system designed to keep him in his unprivileged state. Now Freudian psychology is VERY important to this racial or cultural Marxism. Remember: to these people, things are mostly the result of reacting to environmental (i.e. economic, social, political) conditions, not a free moral choice. So black on black crime, for example, is the result of uneducated black people (who are systematically miseducated on purpose in order to keep them and other unprivileged groups in their state) subconsciously misdirecting their rage at their class status at innocent victims. Meanwhile, properly educated blacks – and other unprivileged – know to direct their frustrations more fruitfully: by political organizing aimed at overthrowing the unjust system. That is why black criminality has to be “placed into context” and on some level excused, as the criminals are also victims.

    5. But when a member of a privileged group acts in a criminal manner against a member of an unprivileged group (or lesser privileged, which is why the “white Hispanic” distinction was important in the George Zimmerman case) it is either consciously or subconsciously an attempt by the ruling class to demean the unprivileged class, to keep them in their place, and especially to suppress any class warfare/revolutionary impulses amongst them.

    6. Add 2, 4 and 5 together and these people deny the existence of crime. Instead, it is all political behavior. “Criminal” acts by the underprivileged is political protest against the class system. “Criminal” acts by the privileged is done to maintain the class system, or simply for sadistic fun out of sense of being “better” than everyone else and hence above the law.

    So that puts “the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success” into context. According to her statements, the knockout game (which also targets Asians and whites as well as Jews) is actually political protest against those who have and enjoy privilege in our class system (either by virtue of inheriting it like WASPs or by learning the system and using it to the advantage of your group at the expense of other groups like Jews and Asians … an excellent book on how this is done according to the Marxist perspective is “How The Irish Became White” by Noel Ignatiev). By integrating with the privileged class, Jews have become oppressors and are now being treated as such by the underclass (again according to this thinking).

    So when this woman (kinda sorta) “denounces” the criminal acts, it is really her expressing regret that these youths aren’t “properly educated” enough to know to express their class grievances by political organizing instead of punching people out (as well as killing, robbing, drug dealing raping – which feminists have long held was a political crime and not a moral or sex one BTW).

    But knowing this racial Marxism stuff explains a whole lot. It is why charging black leaders with “double standards” on black/white crime and white/black crime is useless because liberals reject any notions of equivalence that would form a double standard in the first place. It is all about having one set of standards for one group and another standard for another. It is why black on black crime will never be an issue for black leaders (or white liberals). And it also explains the whole “hate crimes” thing. And yes, it explains such Marxist slogans as “Knowledge Is Power.” Uneducated people in the unprivileged classes commit crimes and self-destructive behavior, but educated ones vote Democrat/socialist/progressive, go to college to study identity politics, join labor/feminist/environmental/social justice movements etc. It explains opposition to gun control, being soft on crime, you name it.

    Until conservatives acknowledge this mindset and begin to talk openly about it, things will never change. Moderate whites do not know this stuff, and if they did they would be repelled. What is more, a lot of blacks do not know this stuff either. How many people know that the NAACP was founded by members of the Communist Party, including not only Soviet sympathizers but almost certainly KGB operatives and collaborators? That communist infiltrators turned the Harlem Renaissance (which was originally a legitimate movement created by black writers and artists) into a Marxist propaganda and indoctrination program (Langston Hughes, Richard Wright, Paul Robeson etc.)? Or that W.E.B. Du Bois, upon seeing that the Marxist revolution was not going to occur in his own lifetime, renounced his American citizenship, openly revealed his secret and long-denied Communist Party leadership and went to Mao’s China to die? That stuff isn’t taught in our schools or depicted by Hollywood. Even worse, so-called conservatives in the so-called alternative media don’t talk about it either. Instead, their crude race-baiting actually aids in the Marxist coverup. When I see them continually playing the “double standard” and “black leaders need to address illegitimacy and black on black crime” card like they have for DECADES instead of exposing why they never will, I wonder whose side are they on.

    It isn’t as if this stuff is a secret. It is openly taught at our universities. Not only that, you can learn about it by reading The Village Voice, The Nation, Salon.com, Slate.com, The Atlantic, any unapologetically left-liberal outlet that makes no pretense of being mainstream or balanced. All the “black Democrat bashes Jews” headlines in the world aren’t going to change a thing. But explaining racial/cultural Marxism just might.

  11. Skip says:

    Cumbo is black and the ‘tough’ thugs (they think they are) are black…case closed.. Someone should tell the people in New York that it is not primarily the Jewish people who are attacked. This is happening in many states and over 90 percent of the time the punchers are black.

    • ytz4mee says:

      They are aware of that. The article in the Jewish paper she cites in her FB post makes that clear – although, “all politics is local”, and to those being attacked in Crown Heights, it feels anti-semitic.

  12. Ed357 says:

    Thank you…..sundance.

    This is not a game……

    Everyone needs to start calling it by it’s true names…..

    THIS IS AN ASSAULT OR ATTACK…….

    “KNOCKOUT ASSAULT” or “KNOCKOUT ATTACK”

  13. kkdgrace says:

    Hmmm- how reminiscent of the attitudes re German Jews in the years leading up to WW II. “Mild” anti-semitism then accepted as “okay”, because the Jews were just TOO successful. Of course, that all escalated- big time.
    URL:http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/m-in_the_garden_of_the_beasts_a_review.html

    • Sentenza says:

      Never again.

      And I’m not a Jew and don’t have any Jewish ancestry. Perhaps someone should explain Kristallnacht to this woman.

  14. auscitizenmom says:

    Well, I think finally a black leader has spoken the truth about the black poverty problem. Instead of trying to lift themselves up by the bootstrap, many blacks feel this way: “the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success.” And, these feelings of resentment apply toward whites, Jews, and successful blacks, too.

    • raskog says:

      “the accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a sense that Jewish success is not also their success.”

      This is her accepted justification for knock-out attacks on Jews? She just implicated her own kind.

    • raskog says:

      Obama feels this way too, doesn’t he? You didn’t build that. He’s trying to take accomplishments away from any *white* group or person, figuratively and monetarily. It’s his whole raison d’etre.

    • ytz4mee says:

      She’s not talking about “lifting themselves up by the bootstrap”, she is referring to the black resentment of the Hasidim’s success in milking the social welfare system AND reaping the benefits of broad based support from the wider more secular jewish community without incurring backlash from white taxpayers, and the gentrification of parts of Brooklyn by the jewish community at large for the sole benefit of the Hasidim.
      (Yeshivas, community centers, nicer tenements, etc).

      • auscitizenmom says:

        “milking the social welfare system AND reaping the benefits of broad based support from the wider more secular jewish community” Um, could you give a little clarification. It seems to me that it would be perfectly acceptable for the Jewish Community to support other Jews in any way they want to and shouldn’t be in question. Only the part that comes out of the pockets of the rest of us matters.
        “Yeshivas, community centers, nicer tenements, etc” Are these strictly Jewish owned and run?

        • ytz4mee says:

          I have posted several articles about this in the past, but I will do a quick recap:

          http://ajgita.com/?p=328

          Perceptions about wealth inequality and privilege trump the reality more often than not.

          There is a lot of resentment from the black community towards the Hasidim, and they perceive that the Jewish community doesn’t experience the same level of scrutiny or backlash that the black community does for what is perceived by some as the same level of “get what you can” – itis.

          http://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/21/nyregion/religion-and-welfare-shape-economics-for-the-hasidim.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

          ”It is not unnatural for people to get what they can for themselves,” said Martin Needleman, executive director of Brooklyn Legal Services of Williamsburg, a nonprofit organization that sued the New York City Housing Authority saying that the city gives preferential treatment to the Hasidim. ”But the Hasidim in Williamsburg have a unique, sophisticated and highly efficient capacity to generate documents that support eligibility for public assistance that do not always reflect reality.”

          Here is an article about the “ex=pat” population that moved north to Kiryas Joel, while maintaining the same attitude that others should financially support their religious and life choices:

          http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/nyregion/kiryas-joel-a-village-with-the-numbers-not-the-image-of-the-poorest-place.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

          Sure, there are probably people taking advantage and people in the underground economy getting benefits they’re not entitled to, but there are also a lot of poor people.”

          • auscitizenmom says:

            Thanks. I have a terrible memory (emphasis on “terrible”) but I do seem to remember reading something about that now. Probably when you posted it before.

  15. IFoundMyVoice says:

    2013 and Jews are still attacked and they “bring it on themselves.” This has also been said of Asians, who especially in high school, exhibit “unspoken disrespect” by their high grades and other achievement.

    Protected hate speech by a member of the protected class that goes unchallenged, and yet Paula Deen lost most everything for once using a racial epithet about a man who had robbed her workplace at gunpoint.

    It seems more and more we are living in an episode of the Twilight Zone.

    Does a medical resident beaten unconscious, or a rabbinical student lying bloody in the street or a young mother bashed into paralysis mean anything? They are not dying and being tortured for a cause, or for crime, or for anything save the enjoyment of those doing and filming the attacks.

    I think these actions should bring down the wrath of every American who has a heart and a soul, unless we’ve already as a nation gone over the falls.

    It will put us in danger of two things: being called a racist, or being attacked ourselves. Can we be that brave, the millions of us who care?

    I remember reading The Hiding Place years ago, the story of how Corrie ten Boom and her family hid Jews in their home during WWII Holland, were discovered and sent to the camps.
    One part has stayed with me, burned into my heart: A young mother had a newborn who she asked be hidden by the sympathetic gentiles. Babies were rarely accepted by town dwellers for safety sake–one cry could give away the hiding place of a dozen Jews. So the ten Boom family asked a minister they knew if he could take the baby home and hide it with his family.

    The minister took the baby, looked into his tiny face, and quickly handed him back. “I could lose my life for this Jewish child!” he said.

    At that, Corrie ten Boom’s elderly father, Caspar, took the infant into his arms and stroked the baby’s cheek with his own bearded cheek. “Sir, I would consider that the highest honor my family and I could receive.”

    I guess what I am saying is that we who are appalled at anti-Semitism,. who declare that WE would have joined righteous Gentiles to stop the pogroms and deaths have a huge part to play in what is happening to Jews, Christians, all of us in America being singled out, beaten and killed for the amusement of some while many in power refuse to acknowledge the bloodshed, or blame the victims.

    The Knockout attacks are still harrowingly marginalized by the press. It isn’t happening on “a wide scale.” Well neither did The Boston Bombing. But the outrage was HUGE. Because we are not supposed to tolerate terrorism of any kind. A klansman knocking out black people would elicit a response near the level of the 9/11 attacks. One incident.

    What am I missing here?

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Well put. What comes to my mind from reading what you wrote, is that the black community along with a lot of journalists are trying to move the discussion away from “black hate actions against other people, mostly whites” to make it a appear there are things that are causing these poor “youth” to act out. It isn’t a Jewish probem. It isn’t a problem of the black young people not having jobs. It isn’t them being bullied and harrassed by other ethnic groups. It is their upbringing and culture. Instead of trying to get ahead themselves, they want to destroy anyone who does, and actually that includes successful blacks. But, as far as this “knock out assault” goes, it appears to be mostly against whites, especially whites who are less capable to fight back.

  16. Lou says:

    the African American community know the victimization game is working. wish someone in the media would point out that Trayvon beat the crap out of George, and open his friggin school records. his attendance records need to be public record, so that irresponsible Sybrina can be shamed.

  17. ytz4mee says:

    As a black apologist/BGI accomplished “victimologist”, she’s also trying to deflect from the article published in one of the Jewish newspapers in New York which openly and honestly discussed the “knock out game” and that it is most definitely racial in origin and not solely anti-semitic, while acknowledging to many within the Jewish community that it may feel that way.

    http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/new-york-news/knockout-comes-crown-heights

    The black community wants to pretend that their long history of anti-semitism doesn’t exist (ha!) (2J’s calling New York “Hymie Town” is one episode they would like people to flush down the memory hole) but not everyone is willing to play the BGI memory hole game. More and more people are acknowledging that the BGI acolytes ARE racists AND self-serving and the victim talking points they spew don’t carry the guilt bonus points they once did.

  18. June McWilliam says:

    The Jewish community has always helped the black community. Yet, blacks hate Jews more than any other group. They can go f*&k themselves, as far as I’m concerned. They hate Jews , yet illegals are doing them irreparable harm. Go figure….

    • ytz4mee says:

      The Jewish community has always helped the black community.

      Mainstream Jewry has always helped every community they are a part of. One needs to simply look at the establishment of Jewish hospitals and research facilities, which do not turn anyone, regardless of race or religion, away, as an example of this creed.

      However….. Leftist organized Jewish activism has always used the black community as their cat’s paws for leverage and to undermine what they perceive to be white capitalistic hegemony. Unless, of course, you believe the Jewish organization, funding and control of the NAACP was simply pure altruism …. sure.

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Looks to me like pure, unadulterated jealousy.

  19. Andy says:

    Its an attempt at murder, and should be treated as such, already children, pregnant women, and older people are being assaulted, I feel sick at these awful crimes against innocent people.

    There is no place for this hate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s