“Assault Unicorns”

Piers keeps going on the “Do you want a tank” issue…. ridiculous. Typical Prog. Who cares. Airplanes have been used to murder more people than “tanks”, and someone tell this doofus you can indeed still buy an airplane if you have enough money.

DUH !

About these ads
This entry was posted in 2nd Amendment, media bias, Potus Gun Ban, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

39 Responses to “Assault Unicorns”

  1. waltherppk says:

    Piers Morgan is a poster boy for terminal stupidity of the Darwin Award type of stupidity

  2. Joey P. says:

    Piers gets his derriere handed to him once again. It’s great to see. Ben Shapiro made him look foolish the other night too. Truly a fantastic effort by both. On a last note: I am not a big fan of CNN or MSM BUT I wont miss the chance to watch Erin Burnette ;)

  3. joeyp1 says:

    Burnett, That is… and remember .. I said “watch”

  4. waltherppk says:

    NRA Stand And Fight
    http://www.nrastandandfight.com/ See video :
    The Media speaks for elites ……America speaks for itself

  5. Chip Bennett says:

    Dana Loesch would be punching below her weight using only half her brain against the Displaced Redcoat.

  6. waltherppk says:

    Piers keeps waiting for a double decker ……but ends up riding the short bus.

  7. Cesar BBiano says:

    I laughed so hard when Scottie Hughes asked Piers if he needed a doctor under Obamacare. Goodness. lol

    • Coast says:

      Remenber..
      we must change
      we need to take action now
      we can’t tolorate “this” anymore
      this time must be different..

      Radical stuff..

        • canadacan says:

          Coast, that article by Judge Napolitano is the best thing I’ve read yet. Even mentions King John and the Magna Carta which I’ve been thinking about lately and the English Civil War. McDaniels at Stately McDaniels Manor wrote some really good material along this line as well.

        • waltherppk says:

          Absolutely a great article by Judge Napolitano. Would we be having this discussion if Ron Paul was president and Andrew Napolitano was vice president ? No because those two HONORABLE men are oath keepers, not liars and subversives and oath violators who present a clear and present danger to the republic as do the Communist and Nazi abusers and usurpers that have become like a beast on the loose among us now.

          • Coast says:

            And imagine how our country would be if most members of Congress had the same honorable characteristics. Instead our government and society is poisoned by the likes of Schumer and Pelosi.

  8. chevymisty says:

    I think Piers Morgan is very raciest and hiding it…He believes in banning assault riffles because of the mass murders done by AR-15’s…yet he still believes in letting people have handguns…Most victims in mass murders are white. Those killings are still quite small compared to handgun deaths which seem to mostly happen to black people. So Ar-15’s which seem to kill more white people than blacks need to be banned…but handguns that kill more blacks don’t? Raciest. >>

  9. howie says:

    The assault unicorns are busy. Planning the spin on the Algerian attack. Al-Gorezeera is reporting all the hostages were killed. They have to figger a way to make der-fhurer look good. A job that gets harder by the day.

  10. brocahontas says:

    That was annoying to watch.

  11. ottawa925 says:

    Interesting comments by Rush today. He set the scenario … what if it was a Republican President and children wrote in to him … asking if there was a way to modify Roe v. Wade to make it more difficult to get an abortion so that more children could be born, so that more children could write to the President. Rush basically asked how would the left support any modification of Roe v. Wade which would prevent children from being killed vs. new laws re: gun control to prevent children from being killed.

  12. Chip Bennett says:

    Oh look: another break-in/gun-theft of a house listed on the Journal-News gun-permit map:
    http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nation/journal-news-map-listed-guns-permits-stolen-from-new-city-home-cops-say-1.4463741

    The thieves ransacked the house Wednesday night, breaking into two safes on the home’s third floor and stealing a third safe. The guns were in the stolen safe, police said.

    But don’t you worry, you simpletons. According to the local yokel PD, there’s no evidence to correlate the crime with the map:

    “The burglary is still under investigation and there are no facts to support this correlation at this time,” Clarkstown Sgt. Joanne Fratianni said in a statement. “If the investigation develops further information, it will be released accordingly.”

    “At this early point in the investigation, we believe it is a random crime and the home was not targeted,” Clarkstown Det. Lt. Charles Delo told News12.

  13. JOC56 says:

    Piers, has anyone ever told you that you are an insufferable douche? Does you ever shut up? I made it through 15 minutes before I had to abort.

  14. Knuckledragingwino says:

    Interesting FBI homicide data on weapons used in various circumstances.

    http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-11

    Assuming that all “Assault Unicorns” would be classified as rifles and all rifles used in homicides are “assault unicorns,” then “assault unicors” are used in a trivial percentage of all homicides and an even smaller percentage of the dreaded narcotics, gang and robbery homicides.

    If you directly access the FBI-SHR database on homicides in particular jurisdictions, you find that the nations most crime ravaged cities are notnthe natural habitat of “assault unicorns”. However; the extremely low clearance rates in these high crime cities indicates that crime is rampant in these cities because the police couldn’t find their butts if they had bells on them.

  15. nobaddog says:

    Piers , You are a very very stupid man! (add English accent)

  16. Is this guy’s 15 minutes up yet?

  17. BertDilbert says:

    Piers “Should Americans be allowed to own a tank argument”

    Response should have been, how many tank murders did we have last year Piers?

    • Coast says:

      Or perhaps if you’re big enough to carry it, then yes you can have it. I think the right to bear Arms seem to imply something that you can carry. I don’t know anyone that can carry around a tank.

      • michellc says:

        I’m not so sure about that. Weren’t cannons privately owned? I honestly believe you have to read the federalist papers and think the way they thought, they had to fight a tyrannical government to gain their freedom, they had a great fear that although they did their best to protect the country from tyrannical rule, that the possibility existed it would fail.

        I’m not advocating that we all own tanks and military planes or even military rifles, however if the founding fathers added the 2nd amendment to be able to fight back against a tyrannical government, then at that time they meant for us to be armed with the same weapons as the government and personally I think that’s why they didn’t say guns, rifles or cannons.
        It is legal btw to own tanks, the government has sold tanks to private citizens they just don’t come with the firepower. There are actually people who collect tanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s